Military Review

The development of an engine for a promising bomber began at UEC

45
United Engine Corporation (UEC) has begun to develop an engine for a promising long-range complex aviation (PAK YES), reports Interfax.




Earlier on the website of public procurement there was information about the order of OCD on the development of engine units for the "80 product" (PAK DA). It was noted that the contract for the creation of the engine itself was concluded between the JDC and the "Tupolev" in June 2018 of the year.

According to the representative of the JDC, the order is about "the production of experimental units and the supply of hardware for the product."

The documentation, including, states that “the electronic system of the engine must ensure the prediction of the state of the product and its systems”; The units of the fuel and hydromechanical regulation systems must be operational under near-zero and negative overloads up to 2,7 g. In addition, all units of the power plant must ensure stable operation at ambient temperatures from - 60 to + 50 ° C, and also be adapted for operation in the coastal sea zone.

The service life of the engine PAK YES is defined in 12 years (may later be extended to 21 year).

Last year, the UEC reported that the preliminary design of the engine has already been completed. It will have a 23 TC.

Earlier in the company "Tupolev" said that the PAK DA will be subsonic and made by the aerodynamic scheme "flying wing". According to the source, the aircraft will be armed with both hypersonic missiles and missiles for air-to-air defense, which will allow it to fly unaccompanied.

In addition, the general director of the "Tupolev" Alexander Konyukhov reported that the rollout of the first prototype of a promising bomber is planned in 2021-2022.
Photos used:
Film Company officers of the Air Force and Navy of Russia
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Zhelezyakin
    Zhelezyakin 1 October 2018 10: 05
    0
    Curious who the engines will do?
    1. Weight
      Weight 1 October 2018 10: 08
      +10
      * I think * that the Russian Federation lol
      1. yehat
        yehat 2 October 2018 17: 06
        0
        Rotenberg brothers will sculpt the engine in their barn
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 October 2018 10: 13
      +2
      SNTK Kuznetsov.
    3. tax payerschik
      tax payerschik 1 October 2018 13: 03
      -1
      None. I am not kidding.
    4. Waldemar
      Waldemar 1 October 2018 13: 09
      0
      It is obvious that Kuznetsov
    5. Rey_ka
      Rey_ka 1 October 2018 13: 43
      0
      Perm motors most likely
  2. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 1 October 2018 10: 08
    +1
    they took up many projects, although, basically, it's all well forgotten old ..
    1. URAL72
      URAL72 1 October 2018 10: 35
      +4
      It’s strange. If subsonic, which is logical and economical, then why not PD-14, or PD-35? There will not be many bombers, the use of a civilian engine modification is a huge saving both in development and operation, and in the case of PD-14/18, it also saves time. If such power and subsonic, then what, again a mastodon in 300t? Or two engines? Stupidly, I hope there will be a car in the weight category Tu-22M3, this will solve many problems with basing, increasing survivability.
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 1 October 2018 10: 39
        0
        Quote: URAL72
        It’s strange. If subsonic, which is logical and economical, then why not PD-14, or PD-35?



        Who said that PD .. will not be used, if only as a basis or developments from them?



      2. Chicha squad
        Chicha squad 1 October 2018 10: 54
        0
        Maybe because the PD-14 has a draft of 14 tons, and the PD-35 is not even on paper. Maybe you need power because the missiles are heavy, 12 x-101 missiles weigh little or what?
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 1 October 2018 11: 16
          0
          In general, they could put two PD-35
        2. URAL72
          URAL72 1 October 2018 13: 29
          +2
          The PD-14 thrust from 12 to 18 tons, and the NK-32, 14 tons without afterburner. Why subsonic aircraft afterburners? To increase thrust to 23t without increasing the d fan and the bypass ratio, nothing. If there are 4 engines, then why such power, or what is the mass of the machine supposed? The load is greater than that of the Tu-160, is it 50 tons or something? Rave. I think it meant a large nomenclature and not mass. In general, based on the available information, the car is scheduled to be unique, primarily at a price, including operation.
        3. yehat
          yehat 2 October 2018 17: 08
          0
          our pilots are fat))) not a couple of Japanese!
      3. Kurare
        Kurare 1 October 2018 11: 11
        +1
        Quote: URAL72
        It’s strange. If subsonic, which is logical and economical, then why not PD-14, or PD-35?

        Their dual-circuit is too high for such a scheme (flying wing) of a bomber, a low-pressure rotor of a very large diameter. But the gas generator can be used.
        Although, as far as is known at the moment, they will do on the basis of NK-32.
      4. Bshkaus
        Bshkaus 1 October 2018 11: 16
        +2
        which is logical and economical, why not PD-14, or PD-35
        The task is timely departure from the airfield and counter-strike from an unexpected direction. For example, in an endangered period, an aircraft leaves for the center of the Pacific Ocean and barrages there for more than a day; naturally, fighter aircraft cannot intercept it in such conditions, and if there is no enemy fleet nearby, then the aircraft becomes invulnerable and missiles will be engaged in air defense breakthroughs.
        All this requires the engine to be so economical that even state-of-the-art civilian aircraft may not have seen it.
        1. Days
          Days 1 October 2018 12: 12
          +1
          In the center of the Pacific Ocean is Hawaii, the headquarters of the 13th Air Army. And the location of the transport wing. In the case you are describing, it is very unlikely that there will be no combat aircraft at the base. Climbing there for any of our missile carriers will be like death.
        2. Guillon
          Guillon 1 October 2018 12: 24
          0
          UAVs need to be locked up, and YES need powerful and reliable engines and often they are not economical, because there are too many contradictions. hi
      5. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 October 2018 13: 09
        0
        The plane will be under 300 tons and there will be at least four engines.
    2. tax payerschik
      tax payerschik 1 October 2018 13: 13
      -3
      they cannot revive the dead.
  3. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 1 October 2018 10: 22
    +6
    Well, there’s not much to wait. In 22 year I would like to see the newest PAK DA.
  4. True
    True 1 October 2018 10: 38
    -10
    Today in the propaganda department gave a prize? How damned stories are composed ... a passenger hyperlet, an electromagnetic weapon, which has no analogues toss, an engine for a starship of cosmic forces. Did Argentinean cocaine reach?
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 1 October 2018 13: 13
      0
      But propaganda is allowed only to the USA and their friends?
      Hello stars
  5. FID
    FID 1 October 2018 10: 42
    +8
    Commentators, NK-32 did not try to look in the internet? He will be on the bomb .... There are no other engines for today, and we don’t need about PD ... I beg you, don’t.
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 October 2018 11: 13
      +3
      NK-32 and planned to take, at least its hot part. They will probably increase the dual-circuit, probably put a new control system. As a result, the new engine will turn out. He will probably also go for Ruslanov’s remotorization. There, just 22-25tn need turbojet engine.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 October 2018 13: 13
      0
      No one will definitely bet on a subsonic bomber TRDF NK 32, since this will lead to high fuel consumption and almost double the cost of the aircraft, since one such engine costs 1,5 billion rubles.
      1. Days
        Days 1 October 2018 21: 20
        0
        Read about the NK-62 and NK-63.
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 1 October 2018 15: 16
      +1
      Quote: SSI
      Commentators, NK-32 did not try to look in the internet? He will be on the bomb .... There are no other engines for today, and we don’t need about PD ... I beg you, don’t.

      Good day Sergey Ivanovich! hi
      That's right ....
      Based on the NK-32 engine, it is planned to create an engine for the promising long-range aviation complex (PAK DA)

      That is, the Kuznetsovsk PAO will be engaged in engines. hi
    4. Zhelezyakin
      Zhelezyakin 1 October 2018 16: 21
      0
      Only not the whole NK-32, but probably based on its gas generator. The afterburner of a subsonic plane is not particularly needed, but the degree of bypass makes sense.
  6. Avior
    Avior 1 October 2018 10: 51
    0
    does the wing flanges add up or is the winglets crookedly drawn?
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 October 2018 11: 14
      -1
      Wingletts have a bad effect on radar visibility.
      1. Guillon
        Guillon 1 October 2018 12: 26
        0
        Winglets are made of radiolucent material! wassat good
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 1 October 2018 12: 41
          0
          And even vertical details are not made of it.
  7. shinobi
    shinobi 1 October 2018 11: 08
    +1
    Not a bomber, but rather a flying rocket platform. There is nothing for the subsonic in modern warfare, they will be removed from the sky on the way to the target.
    1. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 1 October 2018 11: 16
      +1
      Quote: shinobi
      Not a bomber, but rather a flying rocket platform. There is nothing for the subsonic in modern warfare, they will be removed from the sky on the way to the target.

      Yes, he will approach the target and it will be at a range of X-101, and this is very far ... from the target.
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 October 2018 12: 03
      0
      Then I do not understand what not to do just a good long-haul (with refueling, radars, etc.) and not load it with missiles? And do not fool people.
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 1 October 2018 12: 23
        0
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Then I do not understand what not to do just a good long-haul (with refueling, radars, etc.) and not load it with missiles? And do not fool people.

        In PAK DA, a lower ESR is also expected. Well, like any military unit, it also has increased requirements for the resource, noise immunity, all-weather, etc. If all this is embodied in the modification of a civilian airliner, then you get a subsonic version of the Tu-160, but why is it needed?
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 1 October 2018 12: 48
          0
          A civilian liner always has a longer resource .... the hindrance of security and all-weather is a matter of avionics. Missile launch, almost from its territory .....
  8. UVB
    UVB 1 October 2018 11: 44
    0
    Regarding the public procurement website. On the one hand, it seems clear transparency, the fight against corruption. But on the other hand, information related to the military-industrial complex in the public domain ?! I do not understand!
  9. Bypassed
    Bypassed 1 October 2018 12: 15
    +2
    SNTK Kuznetsov, the company is very serious and the achievements of new engines, with the installation of heat-stressed parts with special heat protection engines, worked even in the USSR (literally just before the collapse).
    So yes new - well forgotten old. Unfortunately, with Gorbi, all this direction went under the knife.
    And the technology was very interesting - there were no 3D printers yet, and there was already a print of ceramic coating on metal parts of complex shape, with a given thickness along the profile.
    Unfortunately, the comment program blocks the photo of the test report signed by the general designer. but what was - was.

    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 October 2018 13: 15
      0
      Rather, the new engine will be based on the NK 56.
  10. tax payerschik
    tax payerschik 1 October 2018 13: 08
    -3
    Sukhodrochery to create dvigun need more ambitions to have.
  11. tax payerschik
    tax payerschik 1 October 2018 13: 16
    -1
    apparently you think that to create a new engine, it’s time to spit. I inform you that this is not so.
  12. malyvalv
    malyvalv 1 October 2018 16: 40
    0
    Everything goes back to the tried and tested flying fortress scheme. Only if earlier B-29s were stuffed with machine guns, then the current ones will be air-to-air missiles.
    The principle is simple - dozens of such bombers fly themselves with a drill in air defense and try to knock them down. They can fly up to a distance of the radius of protection of air defense of medium radius and launch controlled bombs. Cheap and cheerful. You can’t get enough of medium-range air defense systems and you can’t stockpile S-400 class missiles.
  13. zenion
    zenion 2 October 2018 17: 14
    0
    Odessa Road Company also makes a harness complex for Ukrainian cavalry. All horses will be shackled.