Summary of events in the Donbass. Dances with tambourines for entering "peacekeepers"

38
From 22 to 28 September, Ukrainian security forces continued shelling the territory of the people's republics of Donbass. The main directions of Ukrainian strikes, by and large, have not changed since the previous week. The settlements of Sakhanka, Kominternovo, Dzerzhinskoe, the Gagarin mine area near Gorlovka, the settlement of Golmovsky (all of Donetsk People's Republic) were subjected to shelling.

Summary of events in the Donbass. Dances with tambourines for entering "peacekeepers"




The number of cases of violation of the cease-fire compared with last week increased: 157 vs. 152.



This can be associated with the speech of Petro Poroshenko at the session of the UN General Assembly. The conflict in the Donbas Ukrainian authorities need to keep in a heated state so that once again you can draw the attention of the West to how the Ukrainian army is opposed to "Russian aggression" and is a deterrent force capable of "protecting the eastern flank of NATO." And the main purpose of this is begging. Poroshenko was looking for financial support, but for now his requests for new loans remain unanswered.

From 22 to 28 in September, as a result of shelling from the Ukrainian side, 4 was injured by a resident of Sakhanka, as well as Kominternovo. Fifteen private houses were destroyed or damaged, most of them in the area of ​​Gorlovka, where the Ukrainian army committed the most massive shelling. As a result of these attacks, two soldiers of the DPR army units were killed. Two more soldiers of the Donetsk People's Republic were injured.

The Republican Armed Forces had to intervene in the matter, which with a retaliatory strike destroyed the enemy’s mortar crew.
The command of the DPR troops provides important statistics. She talks about the losses of the Ukrainian troops as a result of the supply of poor-quality weapons and ammunition. All data are tabulated. From July 2016 to September 2018, for the reasons outlined above, 33 Ukrainian servicemen were killed and 38 Ukrainian security officials were injured. Among other causes of losses - Ukrainian mortars "Molot", which explode not only at the landfills, but already at the front.



At a briefing by a representative of the operational command of the Armed Forces of the DPR, information was provided about upcoming provocations by the SBU at chemical industry facilities in finished chemical warehouses. It is noted that this practice was widely used by Western curators of the Ukrainian regime in Iraq and Syria.



The press service of the People’s Police of the LPR reports about the shelling by the Ukrainian security forces of the territory of the Luhansk People’s Republic. The shelling is conducted from the direction of the settlement of Zolotoe.

From the official report of NM LC:
During the day, the Ukrainian security forces 4 times violated the cease-fire by using mortars 120 and 82mm, anti-aircraft gun, BMP, LNG, RPG, large-caliber and small weapon. The positions of the People's Militia of the LPR in the area of ​​the settlement have been subjected to shelling. Groove, Mikhailovka, Sokolniki.


Fortunately, as a result of these attacks, there are no victims at the moment.

Meanwhile, in the Dnipropetrovsk region are maneuvers airborne assault units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The landing area - Guards. One of the stages of the exercise is the tactical counteraction of two battalions of the 25-th airborne brigade of the armed forces of Ukraine.

From the brigade command comment:
To the enemy was hard.


Such activity of the Ukrainian security officials is also explained by Poroshenko’s clear desire to introduce the entire territory of Donbass, and first of all on the border with Russia, the so-called international peacekeeping contingent. Moscow also speaks of supporting the plan of the peacekeeping mission, but at the same time advocates the distribution of peacekeepers in the territory where shelling is continuing, as a result of which people are dying - along the line of contact. Kiev, on the other hand, believes that peacekeepers should first of all stand on the borders of Donbass and Russia, which undermines the very notion of "peacekeeping contingent". There is no war on the borders of Donbass and Russia, but it is on the contact line of the party.

During his speech at the UN, the German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas made it clear that Germany is considering options for deploying a peacekeeping contingent in the Donbas. Previously, the authorities of Belarus, Turkey, Sweden, Finland, Austria and some other countries expressed their agreement in principle to send troops as part of an international UN mission to the Donbass.
  • armiyadnr.su, 95-I brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    29 September 2018 09: 08
    Hold on Donbass! These "peacekeepers" should not be allowed in .. As Zakharchenko said, these are devils in disguise ..
    [media = [media = https: //youtu.be/9FbRDUHKIXI]]
    They didn’t save .. Everyone spoke bluntly!
    1. +11
      29 September 2018 09: 14
      Why hold on? The problem is that according to the UN Charter, peacekeepers can be introduced ONLY if both parties to the conflict agree. If one is against - walk in the forest.
      Donbass needs them? Moreover, the "peacekeepers" NOT on the line of contact of the parties to the conflict are not peacekeepers, but occupation troops.
      So Poroshenko can even dance with a tambourine, even a gypsy girl with access to a dress - to dance to him - tfu and rub
      1. +2
        29 September 2018 09: 18
        Quote: Jerk
        Does Donbass need them? Moreover, the "peacekeepers" are NOT on the line

        Zakhrachenko did not boot from me, but an attempt, not torture, gentlemen "peacekeepers"))
        [media = [media = https: //youtu.be/9FbRDUHKIXI]]
        Does not work..
      2. +4
        29 September 2018 09: 21
        That's why the article is called - "Dancing with a tambourine", a very accurate title.
      3. +1
        29 September 2018 10: 04
        Quote: Jerk
        peacekeepers can be introduced ONLY if both parties to the conflict agree

        The "Kremlin", if they make such a decision, will easily force the authorities of the "republics" to agree to the commissioning.
        The question is only the will and interests of the ruling olig, and, I suspect, the guys in the Kremlin are more likely to amuse their greed, because the scent has been lost in danger.
        1. +4
          29 September 2018 10: 11
          Let's just say that if the "fascinating" people wanted to, they would easily have forced their chubaty slaves in Durkuev to stop the war AT ALL - and no peacekeepers are needed. But they prefer to amuse their greed for the sake of profit - it's not for nothing that Biden's son suddenly after 2014 began to own the Yuzovskoye shale gas field. The funny thing is, there is no sense in it - it is unprofitable to develop it, but greed knows no bounds.
          And blame for everything, ka-aneshno, "the Kremlin", which all the now impoverished Ukraine-need as a nail in a boot.
          Such crooked fairy tales will not crawl, you are mistaken by the portal, you are on the "peacemaker".
      4. +4
        29 September 2018 10: 20
        Quote: Jerk
        Donbass need them?

        Does Donbass need the Minsk agreements, for the implementation of all points of which provide for a return to Nenka? And the process of the truce itself, in which the Donbass lost almost more than is needed during hostilities? Who is Donbass asking? The Minsk inspiration came to Putin's head, knee at hand. On it I sketched "Minsk-1". Likewise, with the introduction of peacekeepers, it can suddenly happen. At least the likelihood of this is orders of magnitude greater than the likelihood of recognition of the LPR. I'm not even talking about Novorossiya.
      5. -2
        29 September 2018 15: 30
        Quote: Jerk
        The problem is that according to the UN Charter, peacekeepers can be introduced ONLY if both parties to the conflict agree. If one is against - walk in the forest.

        Ordlo is not recognized by anyone (even Russia). Therefore, no one will ask them.
        Quote: Jerk
        Donbass need them?

        Ordinary people who are tired of such a life need it.
        Quote: Jerk
        Moreover, the "peacekeepers" NOT on the line of contact of the parties to the conflict are not peacekeepers, but occupation troops.

        Otherwise, there is no sense in peacekeepers. By the way, Belarus is ready to send peacekeepers there. Is that the occupiers?
        1. 0
          30 September 2018 18: 53
          But there is no ORDLO. Dill, What are "separate areas"? Show with your finger what kind of subject of international law is? So with what cigarette did you find this?
  2. +2
    29 September 2018 09: 16

    31 people died because Ukraine does not produce its own ammunition, but is a landfill for the disposal of trash from around the world
    1. +1
      29 September 2018 09: 32
      nothing personal, the West does not have Ukraine against Ukraine, it’s just a business, and a little gesheft for generals of ukroshumerii
      1. -1
        29 September 2018 09: 59
        Quote: Angel_and_Demon
        nothing personal, the West does not have Ukraine against Ukraine, it’s just a business, and a little gesheft for generals of ukroshumerii

        And you can’t argue, but the Russians are all the idea, the unity of the motherland, the memory of the ancestors ..
        Look, how simple it is for them .. negative

        Business and nothing personal .. hehe
        1. +1
          29 September 2018 10: 06
          Quote: Cavalryman
          Business and nothing personal .. hehe

          And besides - very profitable
          1. +1
            29 September 2018 10: 23
            Quote: Angel_and_Demon
            Quote: Cavalryman
            Business and nothing personal .. hehe

            And besides - very profitable

            3 million citizens of Ukraine work in Russia (then they donate blood for families)
            And these just rob them .. Yelling about the damned. I remember Ukraine was called the breadbasket of the USSR, the blessed territory .. It was mystified and very specific.
            Oh, there was a time ..

            What is going on now ..? In a nightmare, it all dreamed earlier ..
            1. 0
              29 September 2018 17: 35
              Quote: Cavalryman
              I remember Ukraine was called the breadbasket of the USSR, the blessed territory .. It was mystified and very specific.

              Yeah, all the plants were handed over for metal, the land was taken to Germany, and the organs were sold to Israel. wassat And the fact that Ukraine is the No. 1 supplier of legumes for China and makes engines for the European "Vega" is so "garbage".
        2. +3
          29 September 2018 10: 14
          I was more pleased with the example of the Rabbit. Not a penny for the soul, after the victory of the Maidan, he immediately suddenly discovered the talent of a businessman in himself - and the Rabbit’s Wall wasn’t built, but now the Rabbit is no longer in poverty in Florida, the glory of Ukraine
          1. +1
            29 September 2018 12: 20
            Quote: Jerk
            I was more pleased with the example of the Rabbit. Not a penny for the soul, after the victory of the Maidan, he suddenly suddenly discovered the talent of a businessman

            Scythian gold sold and fled .. hehe

            As the valtsman is jealous of him now, but his masters are not letting him go ..
        3. -2
          29 September 2018 10: 18
          Quote: Cavalryman
          And you can’t argue, but the Russians are all the idea, the unity of the motherland, the memory of the ancestors ..
          Look how simple it is.

          Colonel Zakharchenko laughs nervously ... and with him many "Russians"
          people are the same everywhere.
          The article is one-sided. Information on the one hand does not cost anything, because it is subjective. We need the information of the second side, the reports of the OSCE, observers, etc. .. and then this will be an incomplete picture.
          And so the picture, we are white and fluffy, and there everything violates and violates. On the other hand, the same thing. It’s better to read the OSCE reports, they are more informative.
          1. +2
            29 September 2018 10: 25
            What NPs of Ukraine are fired by the LPNR? What terrorist attacks were carried out by the rebels of Novorossiya? But the Ukrainian Nazis - in bulk! From the burning alive of its unarmed political opponents in Odessa - which, by the way, is "terror" by definition, and they are terrorists, to the destruction of, for example, a railway line in Zaporozhye by the Azov battalion - is also a terrorist attack. Moreover, this was far from the war, it is clear what they are doing in the combat zone, even if outside this zone they have one terrorist attack after another ...
            So what is violated is dill, and that is a fact.
      2. +2
        29 September 2018 16: 27
        Quote: Angel_and_Demon
        and another small gesheft for generals of ukroshumerii

        Wow little gesheft!
        1. +1
          29 September 2018 16: 52
          Quote: APASUS
          Wow little gesheft!

          Well, not lard, but just
    2. -3
      29 September 2018 15: 31
      Quote: APASUS
      31 people died because Ukraine does not produce its own ammunition, but is a landfill for the disposal of trash from around the world

      But is it not because Russia entered there in 2014? And now is he disposing of his ammunition in the Donbass?
      1. 0
        30 September 2018 09: 13
        Quote: Normal ok
        But is it not because Russia entered there in 2014? And now is he disposing of his ammunition in the Donbass?

        The more absurd the statement, the more it lends itself to discussion, do you count on this?
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    29 September 2018 09: 56
    S.V. Lavrov said there will be no peacekeepers. Passed already in Yugoslavia.
    1. 0
      29 September 2018 10: 05
      It is not too late to annex the republics and close the border. Otherwise, this gimmick will never end: the economy is falling apart, people are incomprehensible.
    2. +4
      29 September 2018 10: 23
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      S.V. Lavrov said there will be no peacekeepers.

      S.V. Lavrov is the master of his word. Can give, can take back. See Syrian events. At the beginning, "we don't understand the types of terrorists," now it recognizes the "armed opposition" with which it is necessary to "conduct a dialogue."
      1. +3
        29 September 2018 11: 23
        And in addition:Russia supports the activities of the OSCE mission in Ukraine and is prepared to ensure that the Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in the Donbass has UN protection. This was stated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov during a speech at the 73rd session of the UN General Assembly.
        1. -1
          29 September 2018 11: 47
          UN security and peacekeepers are two different things. Do not find?
        2. -3
          29 September 2018 12: 24
          Quote: Karabin
          And in addition:Russia supports the activities of the OSCE mission in Ukraine and is prepared to ensure that the Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in the Donbass has UN protection. This was stated by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov during a speech at the 73rd session of the UN General Assembly.

          Carabiner, calm down .. We know this UN!
          Found hit here .. negative You are looking for everything, well, well
  5. +3
    29 September 2018 10: 04
    Hold on, Donbass. No "peacekeeping occupation" threatens you ... And as the beginning of Novorossiya you are very much needed.
  6. +2
    29 September 2018 10: 25
    During his speech at the UN, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas made it clear that Germany was considering options for deploying a peacekeeping contingent in the Donbass.

    Apparently our Macho and theirs Frau frayed the topic.
  7. 0
    29 September 2018 11: 13
    Such activity of the Ukrainian security forces is also explained by Poroshenko’s clear desire to introduce the so-called international peacekeeping contingent to the entire territory of Donbass, and primarily to the border with Russia.

    ... not to see a petske-drunk of this "disposition", as his drunken hari without a mirror ... angry
  8. -1
    29 September 2018 11: 59
    Donbass - a cover operation for Crimean events, not really needed.
    Here they’ll slowly surrender
  9. -2
    29 September 2018 11: 59
    The Kremlin's words about Donbass mean little. "Red lines" have long been in the rear of NATO specialists, drones, and technological weapons. There is simply a bargaining for the "drain" of Donbass "international forces".
  10. 0
    29 September 2018 13: 40
    I would like to know how Slavyansk residents live near Ukraine. Without sarcasm. Are there any reprisals of dissenters, parades of fascists and others. Or were they all horror stories, it would be better to hear the locals, and not the opinion from the newspapers of one of the parties. I don’t notice the news from there.
    1. 0
      30 September 2018 08: 50
      In 1941-43 in Slavyansk there were also no repressions of dissenters and parades of fascists. I mean, as the Germans cleared the territory at the entrance, the locals lived until the Red Army returned.
  11. 0
    29 September 2018 13: 53
    Quote: Jerk
    Why hold on? The problem is that according to the UN Charter, peacekeepers can be introduced ONLY if both parties to the conflict agree. If one is against - walk in the forest.
    Donbass needs them? Moreover, the "peacekeepers" NOT on the line of contact of the parties to the conflict are not peacekeepers, but occupation troops.
    So Poroshenko can even dance with a tambourine, even a gypsy girl with access to a dress - to dance to him - tfu and rub


    So LDNR no one officially recognizes them consequently, and no one will ask, they will want to introduce everything. The question is whether Russia wants it?
    1. 0
      30 September 2018 08: 52
      How will the UN troops enter LDNR without the consent of LDNR? By the military operation of NATO, with aircraft carriers on the Azov and cruise missiles?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"