Military Review

Russian Defense Ministry showed footage of the destruction of the ship rocket X-35U

28
On the eve of the "VO" went news material that the Russian Su-34 bombers used the latest during the exercises aviation X-35U missiles. Now the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation publishes an official video of the use of the latest aviation ammunition.


The strike was dealt to a group of conditional enemy ships. The maximum declared range of these anti-ship missiles 250 km.

It is noted that the X-35U missile is capable of destroying a corvette-class warship. In this case, the aircraft is not included in the fire attack zone of the ship’s air defense weapons.

The video demonstrates the exact hit of an air-based anti-ship missile in the central part of the target, simulating a conventional enemy warship.



The X-35U anti-ship missiles have been put into service in Russia since 2014. At the same time, the manufacturer notes that they can be used as weapons not only for bombers, but also for other modern and promising classes of operational tactical aviation aircraft of the Russian Federation Air Force.

Russian Defense Ministry showed footage of the destruction of the ship rocket X-35U


The photo shows the location of the X-35U anti-ship missile on one of the sub-engine pylons of the Su-35С fighter.
Photos used:
RF Ministry of Defense, Wikipedia
28 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nevsky_ZU
    Nevsky_ZU 26 September 2018 06: 00
    +1
    250 km is probably not enough due to modern air defense of warships.
    1. Boomandroid
      Boomandroid 26 September 2018 06: 11
      +2
      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      250 km is probably not enough due to modern air defense of warships.

      Are you seriously? Even I have not served in the Navy, I understand how hard it will be for her to look for ships at sea!
      1. Titsen
        Titsen 26 September 2018 06: 32
        +3
        Who seeks will always find!

        It would be a political desire ...
        1. Non liberoid Russian
          Non liberoid Russian 26 September 2018 07: 28
          0
          where does the political desire come from? without intelligence no desire will help
      2. ANCIENT
        ANCIENT 26 September 2018 06: 33
        +2
        yeah, hard flying and crying crying where are you my goal crying wassat
      3. 210ox
        210ox 26 September 2018 06: 41
        +3
        Danil hi Not so much a rocket is hard to search, but to those military who will look for a target in the ocean.
      4. Random
        Random 26 September 2018 10: 12
        +2
        Quote: BoomAndroid
        Even I have not served in the Navy, I understand how hard it will be for her to look for ships at sea!

        First, the carrier needs to somehow find the target or the probable target area, and then ... "go over" to the rocket .... Yes, everything is simple at the range, even more so on the MARINE, but in reality .... very, very not just soldier
        1. Petrix
          Petrix 27 September 2018 10: 42
          0
          Quote: Random
          in reality .... very, very difficult

          It is enough to have access to the Internet. All boats are online.
  2. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 26 September 2018 06: 34
    +1
    I will call them 'sawmill carlibers' good
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 26 September 2018 07: 14
    +23
    Excellent. Once again, Russia responded "asymmetrically" to the US naval threats! They all counted our "Daggers" and their possible carriers ... And bam at once ... It turned out that any heavy fighter can "plant" on the ship from over the horizon! They all expect that there will be no one to give target designation ... And ours all launch and launch satellites for "monitoring" the surface, such as in the interests of meteorology and agriculture. laughing and more of them
    1. Random
      Random 26 September 2018 10: 09
      +2
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And bam all at once ... It turned out that any heavy fighter can "plant" on the ship from over the horizon!

      And what do you know about the launch heights of the X-35s? wink No no rocket is very good good but now knowing what methods a likely adversary uses r / l camouflage ..... this task is not easy for the missile AGSN to find the NEED r \ l target itself wink
      1. bessmertniy
        bessmertniy 26 September 2018 10: 18
        +1
        In any case, this missile carries a real threat of defeating the ships of the enemy fleet. And in principle, it proves once again that powerful navies will soon turn out to be dinosaurs destined for extinction. The more funds will be thrown into their development, the more dramatic it will be.
        1. kasatky
          kasatky 26 September 2018 13: 18
          0
          And what are her chances to overcome the missile defense of a ship (e.g. corvette class)? Is there such information?
      2. Petrix
        Petrix 27 September 2018 10: 49
        0
        Quote: Random
        this task is not easy for the AGSN rocket itself to find the NEED r \ l target

        For all neutrals, a non-swimming area is declared. The remaining goals are all NEEDED.
  4. sagitch
    sagitch 26 September 2018 07: 44
    +5
    Sorry for the bird!
    Or is it not a bird? In the first seconds.
    1. Romka47
      Romka47 26 September 2018 09: 48
      0
      Yes, it seems, and the truth is a bird ... was ... sorry yes!
    2. Petrix
      Petrix 27 September 2018 10: 52
      0
      She managed to dodge.
  5. stayer
    stayer 26 September 2018 12: 55
    0
    Either something is wrong with the rocket, or the video is not about that. Are there different targets on the video or are several videos shown? The targets are different. But this is not confusing. It is written that the frames for destroying the target are blah blah blah. But the hit on the target is shown, and that’s it. The target is not destroyed, it remains afloat, even the centers of ignition are not particularly visible. In the struggle for survivability, the crew will cope. Or you need a few hits.
    1. Rust0626
      Rust0626 26 September 2018 13: 18
      0
      I think it depends on where the rocket hits.
    2. Barmal
      Barmal 26 September 2018 13: 30
      0
      It is difficult to imagine the absence of detonation or self-detonation of warheads, the ignition of fuel from a ship after such a hit. And the ship still needs to be inspected and assessed the damage caused. Therefore, there are no fuel fires or undermining of ammunition, they are not there. After that, the target can be shot a couple more times, as a reasonable application for training and working out protocols. IMHO, I’m neither a sailor, nor a pilot. Passed by.
      1. stayer
        stayer 26 September 2018 15: 08
        +3
        I served in Kamchatka. I just had to see how the rocket from the Bastion hits the target. And not like in this video, but a huge barge. He stabs her literally in half, with an explosion like a volumetric, sea of ​​fire, completely knocking out all bulkheads. The target literally goes to the bottom right there.
  6. Nikolay Fedorov
    Nikolay Fedorov 26 September 2018 14: 34
    0
    The ship stands and waits when it gets into it. Caught ... An explosion, a sea of ​​fire! The smoke has disappeared ... The ship is again standing and waiting for it to get into it. Once again ... Once again ... Explicit title mismatch
    Russian Defense Ministry showed footage of the destruction of the ship rocket X-35U
    and video. Either the video is wrong, or the title is wrong ...
  7. Rocj
    Rocj 26 September 2018 23: 33
    0
    my expectations were not fulfilled ((I thought with a single rocket the ship would be broken in half.
    1. Rzzz
      Rzzz 27 September 2018 01: 52
      +1
      Targets usually stingy, shoot either with inert or heavily weakened ammunition. Otherwise, there’s no way to target
    2. Petrix
      Petrix 27 September 2018 10: 57
      0
      Quote: Rocj
      I thought with one rocket the ship will be broken in half

      These are Soviet hardened ships. Given that modern are not armadillos, then three times in the sexes is guaranteed.
  8. gorenina91
    gorenina91 27 September 2018 02: 57
    0
    - Some kind of weak rocket ... -So, probably at the time of Tsushima ships exchanged artillery strikes ... -100 years ago ...
    -And during the Falkland War ..., also about 35 years ago ... -The Argentine pilot destroyed the latest English destroyer Sheffield with one missile ...
    -And how many missiles does our pilot need today to destroy such a stationary "target" ..?
    1. Petrix
      Petrix 27 September 2018 11: 01
      0
      At exercises or training ground, the task is to hit the target, and not destroy it, even with a blank.
  9. UltraRed
    UltraRed 27 September 2018 05: 11
    0
    Quote: gorenina91
    -
    -And during the Falkland War ..., also about 35 years ago ... -The Argentine pilot destroyed the latest English destroyer Sheffield with one missile ...

    Yeah, and the warhead on the rocket DO NOT WORK ...... The destroyer burned out from the burning rocket engine ..... :)