Russia refused to allocate 10 million dollars to support the Afghan army

56
Russia refused to allocate money to NATO, which were supposed to go to the support of the National Army of Afghanistan. Zamir Kabulov, who is the special representative of the Russian president for Afghanistan, the director of the Second Asia Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, spoke on Thursday at the summit of NATO concluded in Chicago with such a message.

Russia refused to allocate 10 million dollars to support the Afghan army


According to the diplomat, the summit discussed the need to continue to support the armed forces of Afghanistan after the 2014 year. For the United States of America, this becomes a heavy burden; in this regard, they want to partially shift it onto the shoulders of partners in NATO and other countries. Kabulov added that Russia, too, had been hinted that it would have been nice to throw in ten million dollars.

However, as the diplomat said, Russia will not take an active part in NATO projects in Afghanistan. For several years, the Russian Federation tried to become a member of the ISAF supplier club, but without success. This time, Russia was "invited and started hinting ...". However, Russian diplomats recalled that Russia has long been successfully supporting Kabul.

The diplomat added that the Russian Federation will continue to provide all possible support to Afghanistan, only "on a bilateral basis." It is during the direct consultations that the parameters of the necessary assistance will be determined, taking into account the needs and requests of the Afghan side. As a concrete example of cooperation with Afghanistan, according to Kabulov, is to assist in the supply of weapons and technology, as well as in the training of military personnel.

It is reported that in the second half of 2012, negotiations between Rosoboronexport and the United States will continue regarding the purchase of additional helicopter equipment for the Afghan side under an agreement on a supply contract for helicopters.

In the Kabul press, there were reports that the day before, in accordance with the Russian-American agreements, the Afghan side received three Russian-made helicopters of the Mi-17 type. According to Zahir Azimi, who is the representative of the Ministry of Defense of the IRA, the Afghan side previously received fifteen helicopters. According to the agreement, it is envisaged to deliver twenty-one helicopters to Afghanistan.

The Special Representative also stressed that the Russian Federation is always ready to discuss with interested parties the possibilities of interaction in matters relating to the production and supply of military equipment to Afghanistan. Earlier there were reports that the Russian Foreign Ministry worked out a scheme for transporting NATO cargo from the territory of Afghanistan to Europe through Russian Ulyanovsk. However, there is still no political decision regarding the transit point in Ulyanovsk.
The special representative of the Russian president also said that the Russian Federation was not going to bring its troops into the territory of Afghanistan, even if the situation destabilized after international forces were withdrawn from there in 2014. The diplomat stressed that Russia "does not have an" entry strategy "in Afghanistan."

Kabulov noted that events in Afghanistan after 2014 could develop according to different scenarios, including the possibility of a civil war, as well as attempts by extremists to penetrate from the territory of Afghanistan into neighboring Central Asian states. He noted that this is possible, and Russia will react to it.

Meanwhile, a Russian diplomat said that after 2014, it is unlikely that extraordinary events will occur on the territory of Afghanistan.

It should be noted that earlier there were reports that NATO is responding positively to the help of Russia and other partners from the CIS, which it turns out to organize transit for international forces in Afghanistan. During a press conference held in Chicago after the concluding meeting on Afghanistan, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO Secretary General, expressed gratitude to Russia, the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan for the steps that these countries have taken to facilitate the transit of goods for the ISAF.

On the eve of the summit in Chicago, the heads of NATO member countries were able to agree on the transfer of security responsibility to the Afghan forces by the middle of next year. They said that foreign military contingents will eventually assist law enforcement in Afghanistan.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. YARY
    +36
    25 May 2012
    Not for a damn pancake? We must pay for their banquet ?!
    And posasisapososa !!!
    angry angry angry
    Maybe ysh and seeds on poppy seeds ??? angry
    1. +16
      25 May 2012
      Russia did right, there is no need to feed these vultures. It’s better to give them something on the head off, that’s right!
      1. +11
        25 May 2012
        To go nuts application. Such loot will come in handy for us, and a stirrer for the female organ.
      2. +9
        25 May 2012
        Yes, the insolence of some gentlemen .... has no lands ... I’m thinking ... whether to charge them compensation for the supply of weapons to the Mujahideen in our Afghan war ... no, well, they got ... a fallen female creature ... money to them ... plus .. am
        1. surkov
          -25
          25 May 2012
          Once, Mr. Khattab with his colleagues has already shown his abilities to destroy the Russian 12th border post. Does Russia want a repetition?
          1. Che
            Che
            +9
            25 May 2012
            surkov,
            Yes, you went to one place, you yourself unleashed the slaughter yourself and disentangle.
          2. +4
            25 May 2012
            And Benny frolic with airplanes in the States bully How? Want a repeat? angry angry angry
            Once, Mr. Khattab with his colleagues has already shown his abilities to destroy the Russian 12th border post. Does Russia want a repetition? (Surkov)
          3. Oleg Alexandrovich
            +4
            25 May 2012
            This jackal already worms in the earth grabbed
          4. borisst64
            +6
            25 May 2012
            Well, Khattab was not a master, but a bandit. And they show opportunities well against women and prisoners, and against the Russian army they can occasionally attack from ambushes. And the result is one - the frontier posts are in place, and Hottaby and others in the graves!
          5. +1
            25 May 2012
            about noted rotten from the nearest swamp
          6. +1
            26 May 2012
            But did you see the spirit and possibilities of the Russian border guards? Many felt in their own skin, not only saw ...
          7. +1
            27 May 2012
            we are studying several guys from Palestine ... tell them a couple of things ... and the effectiveness of events can be increased several times very simply .... tell me that ???
    2. +7
      25 May 2012
      And why is NATO firmly convinced that simple-minded idiots live in Russia? request In their opinion, our budget at its own expense should provide "US national interests"? Maybe I overslept something and in the States already defeated Mac, who managed to gather a team of downs torn from life around him? wassat
      Quote: ward
      whether to charge them compensation for the supply of weapons to the Mujahideen in our Afghan war ...

      not a bad idea, the same "invite and start hinting ..." bully
      1. 755962
        +2
        25 May 2012
        Kabulov stressed that Russia prefers to continue bilateral security cooperation with Afghanistanfocusing on the requests of the Afghan government. He recalled that In 2003-2005, Russia supplied Afghanistan with $ 200 million worth of military equipment., then one-time deliveries of weapons and ammunition were made, and finally, in the near future, the Russian-American contract for the supply of military transport helicopters to Afghanistan will be completed. At the same time, the diplomat did not rule out the possibility of financial assistance to the IRA from Russia.
        So, "walk" NATA gardens. We will figure it out without you!
      2. 0
        25 May 2012
        These guys are friends with the head, and only respond to idiotic offers, -to whom it is intended
    3. wk
      0
      26 May 2012
      10 lyamov, of course, is a penny for the Russian Federation, but this, as a contribution to the gangster-thief dormitory, put 100 rubles, and that’s all, you are tied with blood .... NATO is impersonating a civilized organization, and even acts in politics criminal thieves concepts.
  2. Yoshkin Kot
    +7
    25 May 2012
    n-dya, what did they think that Russia, wagging its tail, would rush into their dog’s wedding?
    ps not really, the USA in real life comes, northern fox? and poor fellows cannot finance themselves? An alarming bell, for the chanterelle that will visit the United States, it’s worth preparing for us recourse
    1. +8
      25 May 2012
      The war did not end with the collapse of the USSR, as everyone thought, it just passed on to another hypostasis.

      Let's hope that the United States comes back with everything that they have done in the world ...
  3. cobra66
    +4
    25 May 2012
    Here ofigeli we need to restore our army
    1. IGR
      IGR
      +3
      25 May 2012
      cobra66
      Here ofigeli we need to restore our army

      Saw, roll. And here is NATA - give money, give money .......... And in the photo restyled women Abdula?
      1. 0
        31 May 2012
        Gulchatai and her team.
  4. sergeant1973
    +8
    25 May 2012
    here let us go and sponsor this gang
  5. BOSS
    +1
    25 May 2012
    We have chocks sitting on our necks to spoil others)))
    1. 0
      26 May 2012
      Quote: BOSS
      We have chocks on our neck

      Choose expressions, dear ...
    2. 0
      31 May 2012
      you can get a lot of drugs with this money
  6. +4
    25 May 2012
    Russia "was invited and began to hint ...". hmm ... arrogance is the second happiness.
  7. iulai
    +2
    25 May 2012
    they check for lice, but if at the helm was Gorbachev ....
  8. Tirpitz
    +4
    25 May 2012
    What are you so violently reacting to? Help is definitely needed, but not with money, rockets with special warheads and under their own power they should fly there.
    1. Yoshkin Kot
      +3
      25 May 2012
      Yeah, and "help" the Afghans, you need to weed the poppy fields, tiao, it is not bad for this
  9. +8
    25 May 2012
    They are all the same funny guys. Humorous. So sometimes they’ll make you laugh.
  10. +7
    25 May 2012
    Why contact us, let Germany out, pay for everyone, they’re more familiar.
    1. Sergh
      +3
      25 May 2012
      Yeah, the Germans have long scored this jolly, only on NATO concessions on one or two ships and it seems frigates, they approached Libya without firing shots at once, for which amers let all the dogs down on them. As for Hochma, in general, back in 2006, Rumsfeld persistently asked Merkel to send Germans to Iraq for help, to which Angela showed him a big cookie and said that our help would be in retraining Iraqi soldiers and officers outside the country and assisting in the restoration shattered economy.

      Here in Libya specifically all the attempts of Germany:

      The German government intends to ask the Bundestag to approve the participation of German troops in the NATO operation in Libya, Tagesspiegel reports citing its sources.

      According to the publication, the Bundeswehr soldiers will not be involved in hostilities. Instead, they will be involved in the security of the international humanitarian mission in Libya. As Tagesspiegel notes, the EU is planning to send humanitarian workers to an African country.

      In deciding to bring the German military to the Libyan campaign, the government of Angela Merkel did not dare to take full responsibility, and therefore plans to turn to the Bundestag.

      As noted, ensuring security in assisting the Libyans involves the escort of ships of the German Navy transport ships with humanitarian supplies bound for Libya. The ministries of foreign affairs and defense of Germany have already begun preparations for the corresponding mission.

      Recall that earlier Germany refused to participate in an armed operation against the regime of Muammar Gaddafi. The German representatives, together with the Russian Federation, India, China and Brazil, abstained in the vote on the resolution of the UN Security Council 1973, which allowed the application of air strikes on Gaddafi’s troops.

      Germany also refused to participate in the naval blockade of Libya and withdrew its naval ships in the Mediterranean from NATO control. The German Ministry of Defense said in this regard: "Since the introduction and maintenance of the arms embargo, if necessary, provides for armed intervention, Germany will not take part in any of these actions."

      In addition, Germany refused to discuss a proposal to supply Libyan rebels with weapons to fight Gaddafi's supporters. At the same time, however, Angela Merkel stressed that Germany's position cannot be considered neutral. The Chancellor noted that "Resolution 1973 is our resolution."

      In a similar vein, Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said: "We decided that the Bundeswehr soldiers will not take part in the military operation in Libya. But this does not mean that we will take a neutral position. We see the future of Libya without the dictator Gaddafi." Westerwelle promised that after the fall of the Libyan leader's regime, Berlin will provide the new democratic government with humanitarian and economic aid.

      So that the Germans began to think with their heads, and not ... opoy. Of course, not everything is so smooth, but these are the concrete steps of Germany.
  11. ANTURAG
    +2
    25 May 2012
    They are trying to make sure they don’t whine so that they would spend on their conflicts. A hole to them from a bagel.
  12. Art111
    +6
    25 May 2012
    The good news is that once again the Anglo-Saxons tried to drag Russia into Afghanistan. Our fellows, nevertheless, remember that for 300 years no one can defeat the Afghans on their territory. Well done, still remember past mistakes.
  13. +8
    25 May 2012
    That the amer’s machine broke or the paper ran out to print paper. They entered Afghanistan as winners, and they will go bankrupt.
  14. BAT
    +4
    25 May 2012
    HA-HA-HA made the amers laugh. Brew porridge, even let them dissolve. I would also throw up arms to the Taliban so that they would hammer them more. Amer at one time supported the spirits and armed. How many of our guys died in Afghanistan because of this. It would be necessary to put the same pig to us. Let them experience in their own skin ...
    1. Che
      Che
      +2
      25 May 2012
      sichevik,
      They sponsored an alcaide against us creatures. And now to help them. And in one place a piston is not necessary? wassat
  15. Vanek
    +1
    25 May 2012
    For several years, the Russian Federation tried to become a member of the ISAF supplier club, but to no avail. This time, Russia was "invited and started to hint ...".

    THERE IS IT, CORRUPTION IN PURE VIEW !!!!!!!!
  16. Ataturk
    +9
    25 May 2012
    That's right and did it!

    They will fight, they will kill, they will rape and mock people, they will preserve opium and drugs plantations like the apple of their eye, they will be, they will earn money from this, they poison our people, they too, and pay them money for it ? Go to hell!

    Well done Russia.

    I personally, as an Azerbaijani, am ashamed that our government is helping them. It makes it possible to land at our airfields for refueling. From part we are accomplices of this dishonor.

    I have repeatedly seen what they do. They are not peacekeepers, they are not those who establish order, they are scum. All! Both NATO and the UN. These are real hooligans! They have no gram of humanity. They must be sent to X.

    What they are doing in reality, they shot a film on this topic. The film is scandalous and based on real events. Look what they bastards have done with Yugoslavia, and Kosovo is no secret to anyone, this is the parking of DRUGS between Europe and the East.

    Watch a movie



    The Snitch / The Whistleblower
    YOM: 2010
    Country: Germany, Canada
    Genre: Thriller, Drama, Biography
    Duration: 01: 51: 45

    Description:
    Katherine Balkovak is a brave cop from Nebraska who receives a mission to go to Bosnia in order to find out the reasons for the slave sex trade in the country. At this time, chaos reigns in this state after hostilities. The investigation leads the main character to the very heart of the underground slave trade, which is tied not only to the power structures of Bosnia, but also to employees of the United Nations. In an attempt to find the truth, Catherine finds a woman who was able to escape the fate of a sex slave. Now only they can shed the truth on the UN structure and the atrocities that were happening in Bosnia.

    Look, a very good movie. This film shows the true face of NATO and the UN and the whole West.

    I repeat the film is based on real events. In the last post, they told me, although it was either a kid who did not go far from his home, rather a provocateur or an enemy of my people.

    I told the Yugoslavs to us not brothers. Only former countries, even Muslims, are we much more united than with them.

    Sincerely.
    1. borisst64
      0
      25 May 2012
      Quote: Ataturk
      It makes it possible to land at our airfields for refueling


      Russia also gives such an opportunity, everyone is trying to tear more money.
    2. -1
      25 May 2012
      This is well known to everyone for a long time, there are simply many ostriches. .... until they peck, they will not pull their heads out of the sand
    3. Malyavka
      -1
      25 May 2012
      The film is not for the faint of heart. Sometimes it seems to me that I live in a different dimension, because there is no power to believe in such cruelty. Why do some people strive for spiritual purity while others choose bodily dirt? How do they sleep after all?
  17. AlexMH
    +4
    25 May 2012
    As they said in Soviet times about agriculture, "Why support something that is not worth it?" So it is with the Afghan army. It’s understandable, as soon as we leave (and they will leave, it’s not a century for them to snatch billions there), there will again be a war of all against all in Afghanistan, and this, in general, will not make us especially good, except that our former chocks will come running to us again for protection.
    1. 0
      26 May 2012
      Quote: AlexMH
      unless our former chocks

      You would be the cutest with terms more carefully ...
  18. +2
    25 May 2012
    Correct solution! There is nothing to feed the mouths of others, there are few of their own ...
    1. Sergh
      +3
      25 May 2012
      The Baron is right, I’m sure that there will not even reach half the amount to Karzai, and which one will never get out of there! There, people don’t like or don’t know the grandmother, which he took in his hands-let out. If he took up the bill with his fingers, it is his, the rest is not important. This is no longer corruption, it is already lawlessness.
      1. sergskak
        +2
        25 May 2012
        The Special Representative also emphasized that the Russian Federation is always ready to discuss with interested parties the possibilities of cooperation in matters relating to the production and supply of military equipment to Afghanistan.
        Ten million want to get hold of them and decide for themselves what Afghanistan needs? We do not need mediators like NATO, ISAF. In the morning, money, in the evening chairs, in the evening, money, in the morning chairs. This cooperation should be with Afghanistan.
  19. Zlu
    Zlu
    +2
    25 May 2012
    They smoked something strong, which provoked such an offer !!!?)
  20. Malyavka
    +3
    25 May 2012
    Afghan stuffs us with drugs and should we sponsor him? They survived completely out of mind there ...
  21. vostok
    +1
    25 May 2012
    Fuck neither shame nor conscience! Maybe we can also pay for drug trafficking!
  22. Vanek
    +1
    25 May 2012
    - Uncle, and uncle. Give me money.
    - Boy, leave me alone.
    - Uncle, and uncle. Well, give me the money.
    - Or maybe you still have the keys to the apartment where the money is?
    - Neeeeaa smile smile smile
    ................
    - Give me money! To whom they say.
  23. fern
    +1
    25 May 2012
    Better to give $ 10 million to support the Taliban)) than there
  24. -1
    25 May 2012
    Amer on their toys is not enough?
    them the very thing that they don’t miss, in the face
  25. -1
    25 May 2012
    I think that money can be given, but on one condition. All heroin will go to the amers and let them give legal guarantees in this.
  26. gen.meleshkin
    +1
    25 May 2012
    The Americans are pretending to be in control of the situation in Afghanistan, but this is probably not the case.
  27. Ilyich
    +1
    25 May 2012
    It seems that they are consistently and purposefully trying to convince the whole world of their idiocy. Or the State Department sits on the Afghan export product all over.

    "Ivan Vasilievich, when you say - it feels like you are delusional" (c) Shurik
  28. prophetic
    -1
    25 May 2012
    better save up for the bombing of New York and London
  29. 0
    25 May 2012
    For peace Kabulovbeing a special representative ...

    Wow ... what a coincidence.
    And the fact that they did not give money is right.
  30. wow
    0
    25 May 2012
    Refused !!? Well done right, damn it ....!
  31. -2
    25 May 2012
    Ours do the right thing - they interact directly. This will allow using 10 lyam, for example, to push Afghanistan to buy something from us. Business!
    1. Ilyich
      0
      26 May 2012
      Yeah !. Schazzzz. This will allow using 10 lyam to buy what-thread from them, and not from us! Yusovsky prezik No.
  32. +2
    25 May 2012
    I agree there is no reason to fit in ....... although the amount is purely symbolic ........
    I am struck by a slightly strange presentation of information

    Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.


    But are these helicopters not paid out of the pocket of the United States. So it’s easy to dissemble any whim for your money
    otherwise we help .........
  33. Owl
    0
    26 May 2012
    Reasonable rationalism. Correctly. Gratuitous help to a friend of the enemy - stupidity and betrayal of national interests.
  34. 0
    26 May 2012
    It is very similar to ovs: they will crawl into, and the whole world should then pull them by the ears.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"