Democrats are trying to thwart Trump's plan to create a new rocket

15
Democratic Congressmen of both houses of the American Parliament prepared a bill designed to prevent the implementation of the Donald Trump administration’s plan to create a Trident D5 rocket for nuclear strikes from submarines, reports RIA News.





Earlier, the American press reported that the White House intends to violate restrictions on the use of nuclear weapons and to create a new nuclear warhead with a low-power charge, which will be used on the updated Trident II (D5) missiles. The main goal of such a step is to "contain Russia" from the possible use of certain tactical warheads in Europe. In addition, the US administration plans to expand the list of conditions that allow the use of a nuclear arsenal. One of these could be the response to an adversary’s non-nuclear strike.

A bill drafted by congressmen is aimed at banning this development.

According to the Democrats, the new weapon reduce the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons and significantly increase the chances of an incorrect assessment of the situation, which, ultimately, can lead to a full-scale nuclear conflict.

Lawmakers point out that low-power submarines equipped with nuclear warheads have no precedent in the US stories, and the administration should abandon the idea of ​​increasing the likelihood of nuclear war and weakening the security of the United States.

Based on the above, the authors of the bill insist on banning the financing of work on the development of low-powered nuclear warheads, their production and deployment on submarines.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    19 September 2018 10: 23
    If Baba Yaga had planned this, they would not have squeaked!
  2. +3
    19 September 2018 10: 30
    Administration Must Abandon Idea Increasing Chance of Nuclear War and Weakening United States Security

    What is this: a crack has formed in the armored brains of the American Democrats? Or do they just put Trump sticks in the wheels? what
    1. +1
      19 September 2018 10: 43
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      Administration Must Abandon Idea Increasing Chance of Nuclear War and Weakening United States Security

      What is this: a crack has formed in the armored brains of the American Democrats? Or do they just put Trump sticks in the wheels? what

      Himself in shock. While there are two versions, the first: it’s a pity to part with life when everything is already there. (here I really don’t want to fly out of garbage) and the second: all the same, pump Trump, it’s already in their blood and goes automatically ...
      1. +4
        19 September 2018 10: 47
        Pay attention, Kolya: as soon as the topic of the article concerns the United States and criticism begins, immediately minyakers come out from somewhere. wink
        1. -1
          19 September 2018 10: 54
          Do not worry. Cons also increase your rating.
          This is for teenagers a lure.
          1. +3
            19 September 2018 10: 56
            And I don’t worry - let it be minuscule, quiet people.
        2. +2
          19 September 2018 14: 00
          By the way, they minus not only about the states, but also banderlogy and Esrael and many more different quiet people.
      2. +1
        19 September 2018 11: 17
        So they Trump except that washcloths in the pot with soup do not throw.
        Or maybe they throw it up :) Melania is tired of complaining.
        When she comes to the kitchen, if before that Hillary cooked breakfast there - all the crumbs, sausage skins and the like are usually neatly swept under the Trump table.
    2. 0
      19 September 2018 10: 45
      Or do they just put Trump sticks in the wheels?
      The usual undercover fuss seasoned with sauce from all kinds of applications that in any case will not be realized
    3. +1
      19 September 2018 11: 25
      bouncyhunter (Pasha) Today, 10: 30
      ... rather the second, "sticks in the wheels" ... as in that saying - "neighbor to neighbor: I'll burn you hay! - Yes, I don't have a cow either! I'll buy you a cow, mow hay and burn!" ... wink
  3. +2
    19 September 2018 10: 31
    I more and more like the Omerian circus)). Wangyu - these ghouls will eventually devour each other.
    PS And Trumpon also threw new duties to China for $ 200 billion threwsmile.
  4. +1
    19 September 2018 11: 00
    There are sane people in the USA. It pleases me. (Yes, I understand that the elections are on the nose there).
    1. +1
      19 September 2018 11: 22
      Quote: Sergey985
      There are sane people in the USA.

      Yes, for the audience another performance is being played, bad-evil. The United States first entered this path when it left the ABM Treaty, the march continues ...
  5. -1
    19 September 2018 11: 30
    But in Russia there is an opposition that is trying to argue with the ruling party. wink
  6. -2
    19 September 2018 16: 44
    Interestingly, the editors at least read the articles they post. Well, at least on the compatibility of the topic of the article with the title?
    The title says Democrats are trying to frustrate Trump's plans to create a new new Trident D5 for nuclear submarine attacks
    The text deals with a bill prohibiting the creation of small and ultra-small warheads.

    Earlier, the American press reported that the White House intends to violate restrictions on the use of nuclear weapons and to create a new nuclear warhead with a low-power charge, which will be used on the updated Trident II (D5) missiles. The main goal of such a step is to "contain Russia" from the possible use of certain tactical warheads in Europe. In addition, the US administration plans to expand the list of conditions that allow the use of a nuclear arsenal. One of these could be the response to an adversary’s non-nuclear strike.

    A bill drafted by congressmen is aimed at banning this development.

    So what are they going to ban? Creating a new missile, which, incidentally, will be designated Trident E6, and not Trident D5 or new warheads? Plans for the creation of new warheads IW-1, IW-2 and IW-3 provide for the creation of three types of warheads to replace the strategic of the existing warheads. But not one of them is planned for small and ultra low power
    The ban was imposed back by HZ when the Obama’s EMNIP on the creation of nuclear munitions with capacities not even in kilotons, but in hundreds of tons of TNT equivalent. But such charges are not intended to be destroyed by SLBMs. Some kind of muddy article