Military Review

American UAV spent hours of reconnaissance off the coast of the Russian Federation

85
On Saturday, the American strategic drone RQ-4B Global Hawk, after completing a mission in the sky of Donbass, conducted a multi-hour reconnaissance flight off the coast of Crimea and the Krasnodar Territory, reports Interfax.


American UAV spent hours of reconnaissance off the coast of the Russian Federation


According to the agency, Global Hawk entered the space over the Black Sea from the Nikolaev region in 13: 25. For eight hours he cruised along the coast of the Crimean peninsula and the Krasnodar Territory up to the city of Sochi. At times, the UAV approached the Russian territory at a distance of about 40 kilometers.

At the same time, the American anti-submarine aircraft P-8A Poseidon was recorded south of Crimea. It also cruised along the Russian shores for several hours.

According to the report, Global Hawk has risen from the Sigonella base, located on the island of Sicily (Italy). The route of his flight passed over the territory of Greece, Bulgaria and Romania. The equipment installed on the drone, capable of conducting reconnaissance to a depth of more than 200 km on the territory of a potential enemy.

Meanwhile, the People’s Police of the LNR reported two violations of the “school” truce during the day.

According to the press service of the department, the Ukrainian security forces twice fired at positions of LC units in the area of ​​Sokolniki and Lozovoe settlements from 82-mm mortars, grenade launchers, DMP and small weapons. The servicemen of the Luhansk Republic did not return fire.

Recall the so-called "school" truce by agreement of the conflicting parties was announced on August 29. As a result, this truce turned into another, fourth, failed attempt to establish peace in the region since the beginning of the year.
Photos used:
https://www.youtube.com
85 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mvd ru
    mvd ru 16 September 2018 10: 33
    -2
    At times, the UAV approached Russian territory at a distance of about 40 kilometers. You can’t shoot down? We are waiting for 39 to fly up winked
    1. Thrall
      Thrall 16 September 2018 10: 35
      +2
      He does not violate anything, but dreams of being shot down. Will we shoot down?
      1. 210ox
        210ox 16 September 2018 10: 40
        +5
        No, it’s just necessary to increase reconnaissance flights where necessary.
      2. keeper03
        keeper03 16 September 2018 10: 53
        -3
        He violates the fact that he is scouting our territory 200 km inland - this is serious! There is nothing to fly along our borders! Shoot it down - and the thing is in the hat! angry soldier
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 16 September 2018 11: 34
          +3
          Quote: keeper03
          Knock it down - and it's all in the hat!

          Of course, Konechnov, you need to shoot down a razhin. Here without Voros --- shooting a machine-gun mount called a cannon and that's it .... catch the bows.
          Here the matter is different, the Scout according to all the canons does not invade our airspace. Any suppression of his military work, there is a declaration of war. Already Mediated, not Syrian toys. Then everything will happen as an adult ---- the duty boats will perform a special maneuver, but and ground launchers in the rank of starley and higher, will wait for the order of the divisor or Supreme /// to work directly if the multi-duplicated system still crashes ..... //// but this will be the last minute for such a system and for the planet too ....
          1. TAMBU
            TAMBU 16 September 2018 13: 23
            +4
            And when a Russian plane was shot down in Turkey, was it not a declaration of war? Or is it not "Any suppression of his combat work?"
            1. Thunderbolt
              Thunderbolt 16 September 2018 18: 24
              +2
              Quote: TAMBU
              And when a Russian plane was shot down in Turkey, was it not a declaration of war? Or is it not "Any suppression of his combat work?"

              Ours was not a pure reconnaissance, send it to NATO radar-observability, and even after warning their minister of foreign affairs ... They were shot down during a mediated war. Super powers start wars on distant shores, so as not to face nuclear armor
              1. TAMBU
                TAMBU 17 September 2018 12: 02
                0
                This is all the lyrics ... we are talking about a combat aircraft performing a mission with pilots. There were red stars on the plane. The plane was shot down. What is this according to military doctrine and charter?
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 16 September 2018 11: 44
          +7
          Quote: keeper03
          He violates the fact that he is scouting our territory 200 km deep ... Shoot it - and it's all in the hat!

          If only to shout - "Urya !?" On what grounds? What international norms and laws have been violated? Reconnaissance satellites generally scan the entire territory of the country around the clock.
          1. keeper03
            keeper03 16 September 2018 12: 37
            +1
            Our satellites also scan, but UAVs do not fly near the US borders! hi
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 16 September 2018 12: 58
              +4
              Quote: keeper03
              Our satellites also scan, but UAVs do not fly near the US borders! hi

              Because we do not have such UAVs yet, we manage with manned aircraft, but we also fly. And if you flew, then they also need to shoot down? There is no answer to the question - on what basis should I shoot down? Because you want it so much? If according to some laws that you personally invented, then hold the flag in your hands, go and shoot. Before the cheers-patriotic slogans are laid out, the thought process must also be launched. hi
              1. keeper03
                keeper03 16 September 2018 13: 25
                +1
                There is no international agreement on UAVs - this is the thought process! hi
                1. Lawyer
                  Lawyer 16 September 2018 13: 40
                  +1
                  UAV is LA. Why else think up and complicate some contracts there. Everything is already there. (In general, where is the guarantee that this is an UAV, it is not visible from the ground, but we were not invited for inspection and verification).
            2. Grits
              Grits 17 September 2018 12: 17
              +1
              Our satellites also scan, but UAVs do not fly near the US borders!
              That's when our people learn to build such UAVs, plus, build bases around the USA - then we’ll fly
          2. freejack
            freejack 16 September 2018 20: 40
            +5
            I agree ... To shoot down is radical, stupid and dangerous ... because of this piece of iron you can really rake up before a real war .... But to learn to plant them is another clinkor! .. There is no pilot there ... why he deviated, why did he land in the wrong place - hz! Software crash! request
      3. poquello
        poquello 16 September 2018 12: 43
        +8
        Quote: Thrall
        He does not violate anything, but dreams of being shot down. Will we shoot down?

        don’t shoot him down, you need to steal him, make a big net and catch something, I didn’t hear that the Americans were fond of defiling marine robots close to the Chinese after they robbed their robots)))))
      4. Karenius
        Karenius 16 September 2018 19: 25
        0
        Quote: Thrall
        He does not violate anything, but dreams of being shot down. Will we shoot down?

        During the Cold War, our air defense here was set to launch missiles if the plane flies to Yerevan at a distance of 50 km, although it was only 37 km to the border.
    2. NIKN
      NIKN 16 September 2018 10: 38
      +3
      Quote: mvd ru
      We are waiting for 39 to fly up

      20 miles zone, closer need. 37,4 km
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 16 September 2018 11: 34
        -3

        NIKNN (Nikolai) Today, 10: 38

        ... if up to a meter then:

        20 miles = 32,1869 km
        1. t-4
          t-4 16 September 2018 11: 44
          +2
          20 miles = 32,1869 km

          Not a sailor?
        2. Rzzz
          Rzzz 17 September 2018 02: 30
          +1
          These are not those miles. In maritime and air navigation, a nautical mile of -1852 m is used. Those miles in which you have counted apply only to the USA, well, and maybe in some backward countries.
    3. Chertt
      Chertt 16 September 2018 10: 38
      +3
      Quote: mvd ru
      You can’t shoot down? We are waiting for 39 to fly up

      "Shooting down" is generally a delicate matter. Here you cannot flog a fever (no matter how much you want).
      But RER / EW systems should be felt
      1. kebeskin
        kebeskin 16 September 2018 10: 42
        +3
        EW control put out. Fly closer to bring down. And then to speak we did not know that he was not controlled.
        1. dgonni
          dgonni 16 September 2018 12: 15
          0
          At this distance, do not put out. Is that a mini nuclear explosion.
          1. sabakina
            sabakina 16 September 2018 13: 26
            +3
            Have us that, "corn workers" have died out?
            1. dgonni
              dgonni 16 September 2018 18: 44
              -2
              In understanding you are at the level of God.
        2. Rzzz
          Rzzz 17 September 2018 02: 34
          +2
          He has autonomous navigation, he flies on inertial, gyroscopes, speed and altitude sensors. They can be drowned out only by shooting him wings or by planting a rocket in the engine.
          1. Grits
            Grits 17 September 2018 12: 23
            0
            He has autonomous navigation, he flies on inertial, gyroscopes, speed and altitude sensors. They can be drowned out only by shooting him wings or by planting a rocket in the engine.
            And the speed and altitude sensor does not heal?
      2. scientist
        scientist 16 September 2018 10: 50
        +8
        Quote: Chertt
        REM \ REB system should be felt

        What is there to feel? If you drown out the GPS system in the area and introduce the necessary corrections into GLONASS, then the UAV will sooner or later enter the 20-mile coastal zone, you will not fly far with inertial systems with good wind. And even if every 10th flight near the borders of Russia will end with the loss of UAVs, the US military will quickly abandon the idea of ​​such flights.
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 16 September 2018 11: 04
          +1
          Quote: scientist
          If you drown out the GPS system in the area and enter the necessary corrections

          About that and Gutarim. And since the stripes are also made, not with corn on the farm in Iowa, I think there’s an electro-wave confrontation there, only sparks fly and the ozone melts bully
        2. Gray brother
          Gray brother 16 September 2018 13: 43
          0
          Quote: scientist
          What is there to feel? If you drown out the GPS system in the area and enter the necessary corrections into GLONASS, then the UAV will sooner or later enter the 20-mile coastal zone

          Everything will switch to inertial. Theoretically, he can still transmit the false signal of the radio altimeter to him, but it is possible that he also has analog systems for this case - a laser, for example, or physical sensors.
      3. mikh-korsakov
        mikh-korsakov 16 September 2018 12: 04
        0
        Is it possible to transmit false information to UAVs and jam reliable information - I don’t know, not an expert, but if it were possible, then let them fly
    4. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 16 September 2018 11: 18
      +2
      The UAV flight carries most of all a moment of psychological pressure by the fact of its presence, the collection of information about the enemy's territory can be carried out in less noticeable ways (from ground tracking stations to space ones), but there is a cold war and this method is quite suitable. No one will hit anyone, he did not violate the borders of Russia, but flying around the US borders can be used for additional screeching of "partners".
      1. dgonni
        dgonni 16 September 2018 12: 16
        -2
        A good idea. Just need a tool for such a job! Russia unfortunately does not have it at the moment.
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 16 September 2018 12: 26
          +1
          Quote: dgonni
          Just need a tool for such a job! Russia unfortunately does not have it at the moment.

          Like not. And why, do you think Tu -160 \ 95 periodically, they fly along the northern borders of NATO, and don’t understand what ammunition in the bomb bay wink
          1. dgonni
            dgonni 16 September 2018 18: 46
            -2
            Obviously for nerves but not for reconnaissance, at least 150 km in depth over!
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 16 September 2018 12: 58
      0
      One intelligence works, intelligence works against a friend. So what? Let the guys train, improve their skills. It has always been that way. You need to have your own UAVs and let them fly in pairs with the American.winked
      1. Guillon
        Guillon 16 September 2018 15: 45
        +1
        If they give us time for this! hi
  2. Vita vko
    Vita vko 16 September 2018 10: 36
    +4
    For a solemn "meeting" of such UAVs near the Russian borders, it is necessary to develop an air version of a remote demining system using microwave radiation of the "Foliage" type.
  3. keeper03
    keeper03 16 September 2018 10: 51
    -3
    And until this continues? !! am Need to shoot down these drones to such a mother! There will be no war, for there are no people on boardBut American will not poke more into our border territories - they won’t! angry Ministry of Defense - Are you chewing something snot there ?! am soldier
    1. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 16 September 2018 11: 23
      +3
      Quote: keeper03
      And until this continues? !! am Need to shoot down these drones to such a mother! There will be no war, for there are no people on boardBut American will not poke more into our border territories - they won’t! angry Ministry of Defense - Are you chewing something snot there ?! am soldier

      As I understand it, shooting down aircraft in international space or in the airspace of sovereign countries that are not in a state of war with Russia is a call to the beginning of World War 3 ?????????? Chew a sedative, but in the Ministry of Defense they will manage without these tips.
      1. keeper03
        keeper03 16 September 2018 11: 57
        -5
        Who are you with us ?! Woe-liberal ?! request Where did you see the call for the 3rd world ?! Or do we have the destruction of the drone already considered a declaration of war ?! Not yet fortunately but in the European Parliament they are already trying to push through the law on the "animation" of artificial intelligence, then we will live !!! am Then you will chew sedatives when NATO missiles fly on your head! And then, we don’t have a peace treaty with the Japs - so that, in your opinion, can you bring down the islands of the Habomai, Iturup, Shikotan and Kunashir islands? Oh yes - this is also an international space ... Do you know that in Russia we still do not have laws regulating UAV flights ?! good Americans have, Europeans have, but not ours! Hence the conclusion - that there is NO international space for UAVs (especially military drones, and even more so at our borders)! So there is no need here to smear liberal snot on the forum, dear! hi
        1. 2329 Carpenter
          2329 Carpenter 16 September 2018 22: 24
          0
          Ostap was not childishly incurred ...
    2. Bull Terrier
      Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 11: 33
      0
      Right They are such bastards fly in a permitted place.
      1. keeper03
        keeper03 16 September 2018 11: 58
        -3
        Yes, who allowed them to fly there ?! request
        1. Bull Terrier
          Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 12: 00
          -1
          International treaties) can you imagine, if you don’t violate other people's borders then you can fly in neutral zones)
          1. keeper03
            keeper03 16 September 2018 13: 27
            0
            The appearance of UAVs requires a review of all international treaties, and this port is still not there! hi
            1. Grits
              Grits 17 September 2018 12: 32
              +1
              The appearance of UAVs requires a review of all international treaties, and this port is still not there!
              You never know what someone requires. Taking advantage of the fact that Americans are leaders in the construction of UAVs, they will never in any international treaty agree to conditions that prejudice them. They are kings in this area, so do not flatter yourself. That's when we learn to build UAVs like American ones, and not the distant resemblance of pioneer modeling circles, then, perhaps, they will agree to similar agreements.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Andrey Vitalyevich
    Andrey Vitalyevich 16 September 2018 11: 25
    +4
    Quote: Thrall
    He does not violate anything, but dreams of being shot down. Will we shoot down?

    I’d put him somewhere in Krasnodar, or as a last resort in LDNR, the benefit of the take-off was restored ... however, then the offensive would start right away ... but it would be ideal for us ... I’ve lost course, I recognized ... .ah, dreams
    1. Bull Terrier
      Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 11: 35
      -1
      You see ... When you always do something, something is done in response. The answer will be, then we will answer the answer, and so on ad infinitum. And for what ?!)
      1. Andrey Vitalyevich
        Andrey Vitalyevich 16 September 2018 11: 42
        +4
        let me ask you why the Americans are doing this? and what are they doing here? Well, Donbass, okay, but what does our border have to do with it? ... do not react to such actions, they will be taken as a sign of weakness and generally become impudent
        1. Andrey Vitalyevich
          Andrey Vitalyevich 16 September 2018 11: 42
          +1
          although much more
        2. Bull Terrier
          Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 11: 44
          -1
          Intelligence is intelligence. We are in our own way, they are in our own way. React how? Shooting down in the neutral zones of their UAVs?
          1. Andrey Vitalyevich
            Andrey Vitalyevich 16 September 2018 11: 47
            +2
            that's what we are talking about ... it is true, it's a shame that we do not show such activity near their borders ... even in the "free sky" of the Merikos, our plane was not allowed after modernization ... and we sniff in the hole ...
            1. Bull Terrier
              Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 11: 48
              -1
              They did not let ours, ours did not let them. I say this is always a mirror. And how do we fly there? In Mexico, we have no bases)))
          2. sabakina
            sabakina 16 September 2018 13: 46
            +3
            Quote: Bull Terrier
            Intelligence is intelligence. We are in our own way, they are in our own way. React how? Shooting down in the neutral zones of their UAVs?

            Besides knocking down, your brain does not see other solutions? am
            1. Bull Terrier
              Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 19: 08
              0
              Mine?))) I'm afraid you had to reread my whole conversation with a person))) I just explained that knocking down this is stupid)))
  5. lucul
    lucul 16 September 2018 11: 33
    -1
    According to the agency, Global Hawk entered the space above the Black Sea from the Nikolaev region at 13:25. For eight hours, he cruised along the coast of the Crimean peninsula and the Krasnodar Territory right up to the city of Sochi.

    Probably everything was trying to find the "200 army" of the invasion of Russia, about which Poroshenko squealed from the rostrum. ))
    1. Bull Terrier
      Bull Terrier 16 September 2018 11: 51
      -1
      Yes, if I drink as much as he, then I’ll find the Martians in the next house))) she’s such a protein))))
  6. Antares
    Antares 16 September 2018 11: 48
    +1
    On the territory of the Russian Federation did not fly, even on the border was not. What everyone was excited to shoot down already in someone else's territory they are ready to shoot down, not being afraid of anything. Where is the Foreign Ministry there.
    Especially on a regular basis. Partners g.
  7. Whisper
    Whisper 16 September 2018 12: 19
    +1
    And if you blow it out of the drying nozzle?
    1. san4es
      san4es 16 September 2018 12: 40
      -1
      Quote: Sheptun
      And if you blow it out of the drying nozzle?

      It will cost a lot ($ 140 million) ... Yes, and you won’t get a squeal.

      1. Skifotavr
        Skifotavr 16 September 2018 13: 10
        -1
        Quote: san4es
        It will cost a lot ($ 140 million) ... Yes, and you won’t get a squeal.

        Let them prove that it was not he himself who became close to the fighter. In general, they respect only strength and determination. And it’s time to get used to the squeal.
    2. Lawyer
      Lawyer 16 September 2018 13: 52
      +2
      No, you have to fly next to him and close our territory from his cameras and sensors with a tarpaulin screen. So you will not dig in, look - look, but we will not show you anything.
  8. Skifotavr
    Skifotavr 16 September 2018 13: 06
    +1
    A Russian fighter could simply fly by the afterburner next to the RQ-4B Global Hawk and test it for resistance to the effects of a satellite stream. winked
    1. GibSoN
      GibSoN 16 September 2018 14: 01
      0
      So many comments from scratch .. I’m just wondering what is more profitable and to whom .. if we say "accidentally" RQ-4 falls or Tu-95, 160 also accidentally falls? The question is, of course, rhetorical. No one has the right not only to shoot him down, but in general to somehow prevent him from flying there.
      1. poquello
        poquello 16 September 2018 14: 08
        +2
        Quote: GibSoN
        So many comments from scratch .. I’m just wondering what is more profitable and to whom .. if we say "accidentally" RQ-4 falls or Tu-95, 160 also accidentally falls? The question is, of course, rhetorical. No one has the right not only to shoot him down, but in general to somehow prevent him from flying there.

        and why compare the empty piece of iron and the plane with the crew? OVAKS among the bourgeoisie etc. also flies a lot, over there at the same time their anti-submarine canoe flew
        1. GibSoN
          GibSoN 16 September 2018 14: 25
          0
          and why compare the empty piece of iron and the plane with the crew?
          No one compares. This is a statement of fact! Based on the logic of most commentators .. If RQ-4 will not fly, it means that while it is still flying with us, it will not fly either! It is obvious.
          1. poquello
            poquello 16 September 2018 17: 08
            0
            Quote: GibSoN
            and why compare the empty piece of iron and the plane with the crew?
            No one compares. This is a statement of fact! Based on the logic of most commentators .. If RQ-4 will not fly, it means that while it is still flying with us, it will not fly either! It is obvious.

            and where is the logic? if our drones fly at their borders, then you can project, and it’s stupid enough to think that the problems of our planes will not affect their planes, of which there are enough of our borders
            1. GibSoN
              GibSoN 16 September 2018 21: 39
              -2
              and where is the logic?
              So I can't understand! If on the fingers .. Many suggest to shoot down, use electronic warfare, crows, weather anomalies, etc. What is not clear then? As soon as the RQ-4 "sits" in the wrong place, all our strategic and reconnaissance aviation, it is better not to leave the Russian airspace at all .. Otherwise, it will also "sit" where it is not necessary .. This if on the fingers and in 2 words .. Besides everything else, there will still be very serious claims from the rest of the WORLD .. But this is a trifle, because the news will say that they just tried to attack us .. or they will come up with something else ..
              1. poquello
                poquello 17 September 2018 01: 42
                0
                Quote: GibSoN
                and where is the logic?
                So I can't understand! If on the fingers .. Many suggest to shoot down, use electronic warfare, crows, weather anomalies, etc. What is not clear then? As soon as the RQ-4 "sits" in the wrong place, all our strategic and reconnaissance aviation, it is better not to leave the Russian airspace at all .. Otherwise, it will also "sit" where it is not necessary ..

                uhh how scary, that is, it is enough for the Americans to sit down where they need to and start yelling that these are Russians? it's on the fingers
                Quote: poquello
                and why compare the empty piece of iron and the plane with the crew?

                and this is on the fingers - why
                Quote: poquello
                stupid enough to think that the problems of our planes will not affect their planes

                and it’s on the fingers, otherwise
        2. Lawyer
          Lawyer 16 September 2018 16: 07
          0
          How do you know that it is empty - they showed you the insides?
          1. poquello
            poquello 16 September 2018 17: 12
            0
            Quote: Jurist
            How do you know that it is empty - they showed you the insides?

            ) But what, there are trained monkeys sitting there?
            1. Lawyer
              Lawyer 16 September 2018 21: 17
              0
              but we don’t care who is sitting there or not sitting, we can’t check - maybe he has a thermonuclear charge on board.
    2. Antares
      Antares 16 September 2018 15: 33
      +3
      Quote: Skifotavr
      A Russian fighter could simply fly next to the RQ-4B Global Hawk in an afterburner and test it for resistance to the effects of a satellite jet

      I'm afraid the fate of the Russian fighter flew into someone else's space is not enviable. However, after the tomato war, for a much smaller violation of the border (and you propose 40 km deep into foreign territory)
      in general, it’s good that they don’t read the brave marshals of VO and other resources ..
      1. poquello
        poquello 16 September 2018 17: 14
        0
        Quote: Antares
        Quote: Skifotavr
        A Russian fighter could simply fly next to the RQ-4B Global Hawk in an afterburner and test it for resistance to the effects of a satellite jet

        I'm afraid the fate of the Russian fighter flew into someone else's space is not enviable. However, after the tomato war, for a much smaller violation of the border (and you propose 40 km deep into foreign territory)
        in general, it’s good that they don’t read the brave marshals of VO and other resources ..

        You should at least read the title.
        1. GibSoN
          GibSoN 16 September 2018 21: 59
          -3
          You should at least read the title.
          Your problem is that you draw conclusions based on the "titles"! Which on the VO resource, in general, very rarely have an unbiased nature and, as a result, the VO resource is not even a News resource.
          1. poquello
            poquello 17 September 2018 01: 52
            0
            Quote: GibSoN
            You should at least read the title.
            Your problem is that you draw conclusions based on the "titles"!

            I prefer not to read the diagonal articles, unlike you, in this case, to understand that the drone flew not only through the territory of dill, but also over neutral international territory, just read the title
  9. Old26
    Old26 16 September 2018 17: 34
    0
    Quote: mvd ru
    At times, the UAV approached Russian territory at a distance of about 40 kilometers. You can’t shoot down? We are waiting for 39 to fly up winked

    No, when it flies up to 22 km ...

    Quote: Thrall
    He does not violate anything, but dreams of being shot down. Will we shoot down?

    In neutral waters? Then what are we better than them?

    Quote: keeper03
    He violates the fact that he is scouting our territory 200 km inland - this is serious! There is nothing to fly along our borders! Shoot it down - and the thing is in the hat! angry soldier

    Correctly. It's that simple. You would be the Supreme Commander, you would not have a price. And we agree that the Americans shot down our planes, performing reconnaissance flights 30-40 km from the United States. They violate too. Smoltryat in the depths of American territory. Damn, not posts, but some kind of kindergarten
    Chippers, damn it.
    You need to think before you offer someone to shoot down, because our planes are also reconnaissance, and so you give the enemy carte blanche to shoot down our planes on this basis

    Quote: TAMBU
    And when a Russian plane was shot down in Turkey, was it not a declaration of war? Or is it not "Any suppression of his combat work?"

    Do not confuse warm with soft. In Turkey, the plane was shot down in a war zone, practically on the border with Turkey, and it is still not clear whether it flew even for a second into Turkish territory or was still shot down over Syrian territory. And there it was probably a distance of hundreds of meters from (abroad) or 1-2 km. And that was the combat bomber incident. And then they propose to destroy a reconnaissance aircraft that does not invade our airspace and does not even make any "gestures" that could be interpreted there ...

    Quote: keeper03
    Our satellites also scan, but UAVs do not fly near the US borders! hi

    Because they are not from the word at all ...

    Quote: keeper03
    There is no international agreement on UAVs - this is the thought process! hi

    Are there no planes? What kind of mania to come up with? They equate UAVs with cruise missiles (too lazy to read the relevant documents on the control of missile technologies and UN Security Council documents, it’s easier just to go down), now they are inventing some kind of UAV agreements? But nothing that there are no contracts for balloons?

    Quote: NIKNN
    Quote: mvd ru
    We are waiting for 39 to fly up

    20 miles zone, closer need. 37,4 km

    Generally TWELVE MILESthat is 22, 236 km

    Quote: scientist
    Quote: Chertt
    REM \ REB system should be felt

    What is there to feel? If you drown out the GPS system in the area and introduce the necessary corrections into GLONASS, then the UAV will sooner or later enter the 20-mile coastal zone, you will not fly far with inertial systems with good wind. And even if every 10th flight near the borders of Russia will end with the loss of UAVs, the US military will quickly abandon the idea of ​​such flights.

    Don't you think that if you lose the option with GPS, the protective contour will be able to work and the UAV will automatically leave the object of research with a guarantee so as not to get into the therweds? In addition, the speed of the same "Global Hawk" cruising is about 575 km / h, the wind speed, at such heights, if there is a couple of hundred km / h, but not 600. Although inertial systems are capable of accumulating errors, but for a flight along on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus, this scout needs about half an hour. I do not think that there will be such an accumulation of errors in half an hour of flight that the scout will move 2 tens of kilometers from the initial flight path

    Quote: keeper03
    And until this continues? !! am Need to shoot down these drones to such a mother! There will be no war, for there are no people on boardBut American will not poke more into our border territories - they won’t! angry Ministry of Defense - Are you chewing something snot there ?! am soldier

    Send you a slingshot, you are our forumkeeper

    Quote: Skifotavr
    Quote: san4es
    It will cost a lot ($ 140 million) ... Yes, and you won’t get a squeal.

    Let them prove that it was not he himself who became close to the fighter. In general, they respect only strength and determination. And it’s time to get used to the squeal.

    Well, the enemy is not worth keeping for the fools. It's not a kindergarten showdown, like Vasya didn't give me a bucket, and I won't give him a spatula. Hawk has a synthetic aperture radar with a range of about 200 km. Within a radius of 100 km it records, incl. and moving ground targets, and only an approaching plane will see. Moreover, it is usually transmitted in real time via a satellite channel or through a backup aircraft. So declare that he approached ours - this is at the level of a kindergarten. Unlike our such statements, they will provide both telemetry and a radar image of our fighter attached to the map ...
    1. Lawyer
      Lawyer 16 September 2018 21: 20
      0
      and what prohibits flying next to a parallel course and just suppress it?
    2. GibSoN
      GibSoN 16 September 2018 21: 51
      -3
      and it is still not clear whether he flew into Turkish territory for at least a second or whether he was still shot down over Syrian territory.
      Everything is very clear there! Not everyone has such a short memory. (in the end, there are archives .. all this was shown even on the central channels in the news). Before .. many times, expressed, presented, etc .. all kinds of indignation .. and it even came to the point that Turkey shot down a drone of the Russian Federation and pointedly poked its nose into this matter! And, while only officially, not counting the other channels, it was clearly stated several times that they would shoot down! What happened what happened .. What was the result ?! What happened to the Su-24 on the border with Turkey is entirely on the shoulders of the leadership! Moreover. All this very clearly demonstrates the desire for provocation to achieve certain goals. There are no miracles. "There", not stupid people sit, so that so many obvious things would happen. The naivety of the population is striking that they themselves have stopped thinking. Yes, and everyone has such a short memory ..
    3. Rzzz
      Rzzz 17 September 2018 02: 45
      0
      Not the fact that the plane will notice by the way. The whole trick of the synthesized aperture is that a low-power radar with a small antenna takes several "pictures" from different points when the drone moves, and they are then processed and stitched together. It is good to shoot stationary objects, and the plane will most likely be discarded as a hindrance.
      If the GPS signal is lost, by the way, most likely it will use the radar picture as a guide. With such brains on board ..
  10. Forestol
    Forestol 16 September 2018 20: 45
    0
    This UAV did not violate the air border of the Russian Federation. Therefore, he was not shot down. The CKP EKR necessarily controlled this flight, and the general on duty probably prayed that there would be no emergency during his duty. Only here, who was interested in watching or showing, a big question. Ukraine is preparing a blitzkrieg, and the opening of large forces at the southern borders on the territory of the Russian Federation will quickly form idiots.
  11. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 17 September 2018 03: 36
    0
    Electronic warfare and only electronic warfare-lost control or a small ceramic "birdie" for the engine !!! I think we have options, but it's not that simple !!! especially when Poseidon is near.
  12. Rzzz
    Rzzz 17 September 2018 22: 08
    0
    In general, this is a provocation. If our plane approaches, the operator in Italy clicks the mouse - and the engine will stop at the hawk and he will plunge into the sea and sink at a depth of two kilometers. And go and smear yourself then, the whole world will shout "Those evil Russians did it!" And already without HighleyLikley.