Myths about the origin of Ukraine and the Ukrainians. Myth 1. Ukraine is the successor of Kievan Rus
Modern Ukraine is positioning itself as a state with a very ancient history and even more ancient origin of the Ukrainian nation. The ideologues of this nation have their roots in the Tripoli culture, and according to the latest version - from the Sumerian civilization. At the same time, the Russian roots of the population living in this territory are completely denied.
All this looks ridiculous, but the younger generation is driven into the head by this historical nonsense, based on forgery, myths, legends and hoaxes of the history of the origin of Ukraine and its population. If you delve into the historical documents, it becomes clear that no "ancient Ukrainian nation" never existed. On these lands there always lived one people, which from ancient times was called Russian - with its history, culture, victories and defeats.
Ukrainian historiography is silent about the Polish-Austrian project "Ukraine", aimed at splitting Russian unity, based on the monstrous lies about the centuries-old enmity of Russians and Ukrainians, the desire of "Muscovy" to conquer the freedom-loving Cossacks, the European roots of the Ukrainian nation and the thousand-year history of this never existing of the state.
Today in Ukraine lives one of the branches of the Russian people, which they called Little Russians, now Ukrainians. Here also live the so-called ukry without a clan and tribe, seeking to justify their complexes with their hatred of the Russian people. God is their judge.
To reveal all this lies and mystification, we in 2012, literally on our knees, released the 500 seconds of truth about Ukraine video series, which revealed the truth about the origin of the ancient ukrov, the term “Ukraine”, the Ukrainian language, the flag, the coat of arms and the anthem of Ukraine, Jude Mazepa, the sadist Bandera and many other myths of this premature state. He opens his eyes to the fictional story of the “Ukrainian nation”, built on forgery and hoaxes, oblivion of his past and the glorification of traitors and traitors.
Videos made a lot of noise in the then Ukraine. Ukry even released their series under the same name, but it was pathetic attempts to justify the false story, and after two episodes, he died safely. When the number of views was close to a million, and there were more than ninety thousand comments, the authorities (this was still under Yanukovych!) Got the show removed from the YouTube channel because of our plagiarism, but they didn’t explain which one.
Taking into account the coming to power in Ukraine of the Nazi regime, which adopted the ideas and myths of ukrov, we decided to state the true story on the basis of the materials of the series “500 seconds of truth about Ukraine”.
Myth 1. Ukraine is the successor of Kievan Rus
Ukrainian historiography claims that modern Ukraine went from Kievan Rus on the grounds that they are geographically located on these lands. Nearby mystifiers do not wonder why, for example, modern Italy does not lead its roots from ancient Rome? There is probably no historical basis for this.
We take historical documents. Starting from the 10th century, the “Historical Russian” and the 11th century “The Tale of Bygone Years” are indisputable in historical chronicles, and Prince Oleg, in 882, orders Kiev to be considered the “mother of Russian cities”. Where is Ukraine?
Go ahead. XI century - the heyday of Kievan Rus. Today, everyone is inspired that this is ancient Ukraine, and the so-called Muscovy and Muscovites are a completely different nation. We look at the map: Kiev, Chernigov, Novgorod, Rostov, Ryazan. From Lake Ladoga to the tributaries of the Dnieper. One nation, a common history from the 9th century, speaks the same language, the Rurik dynasty rules everywhere. The whole world calls them dews, Russians, Russians, Russians. No ukrov there is no trace. Where is at least one document that this land was called Ukraine and ukry lived on it?
We open the textbook of the history of Ukraine 7 class and are surprised to learn that the ancient Ukrainian nation originated 140 thousands of years ago! Can you imagine that? Reasonable man will appear about 40 thousands of years ago, and ukry already 100 thousands of years beat mammoths!
Russian princes rule in Russia. But ukrovskaya history divides them into friends and foes. So, Vladimir Monomakh is a Ukrainian prince, and his son Yuri Dolgoruky is the founder of Moscow, the cursed Moskal. The grandson of Monomakh, Andrei Bogolyubsky, is generally an enemy and a robber; his local nobility did not allow him to reign in Kiev, and he took and transferred the capital of Russia to Vladimir.
Go ahead - XIII century. Mongol invasion of Russia, in 1240, they stormed Kiev and destroyed it to the ground. On the southern Russian lands of desolation, life moves north to Vladimir and Moscow, where Russian lands unite with time at hand of the Rurik dwellers and the state is reborn.
South Russia is a modern Ukraine, ceases independent existence and for four centuries is considered only as part of Polish and Lithuanian history.
The capital city of Kyiv, the “mother of Russian cities”, in the XI century - one of the largest cities in Europe, where there were more than 400 churches, according to traveler Plano Carpini, was in 1246 an insignificant town of two hundred courtyards, for more than two centuries it lies in ruins , surviving only as one of the religious centers. And it was ruled in the second half of the 13th century by the governors of Vladimir, the Horde Baskaks and the local princes, whose names are unknown in history.
Local nobility continues the division of power, so, for 86 years before the Mongol invasion in Kiev, the prince changed 41. They ruled for a year or two, killed and expelled each other, ravaging the land in civil strife, which predetermined the fall of the princely dynasty.
The most adventurous, Daniel Galitsky, the Galician prince, instead of gathering Russian lands, decided to become king, in 1254, from the hands of the Pope of Rome, the royal title and, as they say, euro-integrated. As a result, Galicia from the year 1392 becomes a Polish province and almost for 700 years (up to 1939 year) loses touch with their relatives.
Thus, on these lands, a nation of traitors begins to emerge, striving to forget its ancient Russian roots, hating its kinsmen and ready to become true slaves of European masters. Modern Galicia worthily continues their work.
Fragmented, desolate and powerless southern Russia does not detect any signs of the formation of statehood and submits to almost no resistance by the Lithuanians. In 1321, the Kiev prince Sudislav recognized himself as a vassal of Lithuania, and in 1362, the grand duke of Lithuania Olgerd finally conquered all the southern Russian lands, which eventually passed under the rule of Poland. In 1299, the residence of the Metropolitan was transferred from Kiev to Vladimir, and then to Moscow, and the glorious city of Kiev was gradually reduced to the level of the county town.
In the confrontation with the enemies for the Russian lands, only northern Russia defended them. Ivan III accepts the title of sovereign of all Russia, unites the Russian lands and expels the Horde in 1480.
So, Kievan Rus disappeared, no Ukraine appeared, and before the Pereyaslav Rada, the rule of the Lithuanian and Polish gentry was established on these lands. The South Russian nobility and the local Rurik leaders who had headed it betrayed their people. Among them, Alexander Nevsky and Dmitry Donskoy was not among them, there is not a single name worthy of respect and reverence, they did not remain in history. Traitors deservedly be forgotten descendants.
The nobility went over to the side of the enemies and assimilated from the mercenary motives with the Lithuanian and Polish gentry. There remained the South Russian people without their elite, waiting for its centuries-old fate of serfs and servants, the cities were abandoned and the Polish-Lithuanian government reigned.
This period is unique in Ukrovian historiography. Tell nothing about continuous defeat and humiliation. In the history of the names of only the Lithuanian-Polish gentry and there is nothing Ukrainian.
You want so much glorious history and great achievements! There is nothing simpler: we will invent a story for ourselves! Instead of Rurik, by the will of the myth-makers, the Ukrainian Olgerdovich dynasty appears. The conquerors of southern Russia from the branch of the great Lithuanian princes, Olgerd, Vladimir, Olelka, and Simeon, who ruled these lands and were at enmity with the Poles because of them were declared the “liberators” and supporters of the formation of Ukrainian statehood.
To what baseness can one reach in order to exalt one's enslavers and oppressors to the descendants!
Further more. If you open the history textbook, you can find out that, it turns out, there were even Ukrainian princes. Who are they?
Chartoryi - the grandson of the great Lithuanian prince Olgerd.
Zbarazhsky - Polish nobleman, the crowned stable.
Ostrozhsky - the great Lithuanian hetman.
Vishnevetsky –Polish prince of royal blood.
This is how the history of Ukraine after Kievan Rus is written. After the Mongol invasion in southern Russia, there are no Russians, no Ukrainian princes or nobles, the land was scanty for big names. In the absence of their outstanding personalities, myths are created to justify the worthlessness and betrayal of the southern Russian elite.
Only the Orthodox faith, relegated to the level of the “Khlopas”, remained in the souls of the common people and the priests who kept the traditions of their ancestors.
Virtually nothing remains of Kievan Rus on the lands of the Dnieper; it went north to Vladimir and Moscow, in order to return in 400 years and revive the glorious traditions of Rus.
What kind of continuity of modern Ukraine from ancient Kievan Rus can we talk about if all the spiritual, cultural and secular life of the old Russian state moved to northern Russia, which became the successor of Kievan Rus?
To be continued ...
All this looks ridiculous, but the younger generation is driven into the head by this historical nonsense, based on forgery, myths, legends and hoaxes of the history of the origin of Ukraine and its population. If you delve into the historical documents, it becomes clear that no "ancient Ukrainian nation" never existed. On these lands there always lived one people, which from ancient times was called Russian - with its history, culture, victories and defeats.
Ukrainian historiography is silent about the Polish-Austrian project "Ukraine", aimed at splitting Russian unity, based on the monstrous lies about the centuries-old enmity of Russians and Ukrainians, the desire of "Muscovy" to conquer the freedom-loving Cossacks, the European roots of the Ukrainian nation and the thousand-year history of this never existing of the state.
Today in Ukraine lives one of the branches of the Russian people, which they called Little Russians, now Ukrainians. Here also live the so-called ukry without a clan and tribe, seeking to justify their complexes with their hatred of the Russian people. God is their judge.
To reveal all this lies and mystification, we in 2012, literally on our knees, released the 500 seconds of truth about Ukraine video series, which revealed the truth about the origin of the ancient ukrov, the term “Ukraine”, the Ukrainian language, the flag, the coat of arms and the anthem of Ukraine, Jude Mazepa, the sadist Bandera and many other myths of this premature state. He opens his eyes to the fictional story of the “Ukrainian nation”, built on forgery and hoaxes, oblivion of his past and the glorification of traitors and traitors.
Videos made a lot of noise in the then Ukraine. Ukry even released their series under the same name, but it was pathetic attempts to justify the false story, and after two episodes, he died safely. When the number of views was close to a million, and there were more than ninety thousand comments, the authorities (this was still under Yanukovych!) Got the show removed from the YouTube channel because of our plagiarism, but they didn’t explain which one.
Taking into account the coming to power in Ukraine of the Nazi regime, which adopted the ideas and myths of ukrov, we decided to state the true story on the basis of the materials of the series “500 seconds of truth about Ukraine”.
Myth 1. Ukraine is the successor of Kievan Rus
Ukrainian historiography claims that modern Ukraine went from Kievan Rus on the grounds that they are geographically located on these lands. Nearby mystifiers do not wonder why, for example, modern Italy does not lead its roots from ancient Rome? There is probably no historical basis for this.
We take historical documents. Starting from the 10th century, the “Historical Russian” and the 11th century “The Tale of Bygone Years” are indisputable in historical chronicles, and Prince Oleg, in 882, orders Kiev to be considered the “mother of Russian cities”. Where is Ukraine?
Go ahead. XI century - the heyday of Kievan Rus. Today, everyone is inspired that this is ancient Ukraine, and the so-called Muscovy and Muscovites are a completely different nation. We look at the map: Kiev, Chernigov, Novgorod, Rostov, Ryazan. From Lake Ladoga to the tributaries of the Dnieper. One nation, a common history from the 9th century, speaks the same language, the Rurik dynasty rules everywhere. The whole world calls them dews, Russians, Russians, Russians. No ukrov there is no trace. Where is at least one document that this land was called Ukraine and ukry lived on it?
We open the textbook of the history of Ukraine 7 class and are surprised to learn that the ancient Ukrainian nation originated 140 thousands of years ago! Can you imagine that? Reasonable man will appear about 40 thousands of years ago, and ukry already 100 thousands of years beat mammoths!
Russian princes rule in Russia. But ukrovskaya history divides them into friends and foes. So, Vladimir Monomakh is a Ukrainian prince, and his son Yuri Dolgoruky is the founder of Moscow, the cursed Moskal. The grandson of Monomakh, Andrei Bogolyubsky, is generally an enemy and a robber; his local nobility did not allow him to reign in Kiev, and he took and transferred the capital of Russia to Vladimir.
Go ahead - XIII century. Mongol invasion of Russia, in 1240, they stormed Kiev and destroyed it to the ground. On the southern Russian lands of desolation, life moves north to Vladimir and Moscow, where Russian lands unite with time at hand of the Rurik dwellers and the state is reborn.
South Russia is a modern Ukraine, ceases independent existence and for four centuries is considered only as part of Polish and Lithuanian history.
The capital city of Kyiv, the “mother of Russian cities”, in the XI century - one of the largest cities in Europe, where there were more than 400 churches, according to traveler Plano Carpini, was in 1246 an insignificant town of two hundred courtyards, for more than two centuries it lies in ruins , surviving only as one of the religious centers. And it was ruled in the second half of the 13th century by the governors of Vladimir, the Horde Baskaks and the local princes, whose names are unknown in history.
Local nobility continues the division of power, so, for 86 years before the Mongol invasion in Kiev, the prince changed 41. They ruled for a year or two, killed and expelled each other, ravaging the land in civil strife, which predetermined the fall of the princely dynasty.
The most adventurous, Daniel Galitsky, the Galician prince, instead of gathering Russian lands, decided to become king, in 1254, from the hands of the Pope of Rome, the royal title and, as they say, euro-integrated. As a result, Galicia from the year 1392 becomes a Polish province and almost for 700 years (up to 1939 year) loses touch with their relatives.
Thus, on these lands, a nation of traitors begins to emerge, striving to forget its ancient Russian roots, hating its kinsmen and ready to become true slaves of European masters. Modern Galicia worthily continues their work.
Fragmented, desolate and powerless southern Russia does not detect any signs of the formation of statehood and submits to almost no resistance by the Lithuanians. In 1321, the Kiev prince Sudislav recognized himself as a vassal of Lithuania, and in 1362, the grand duke of Lithuania Olgerd finally conquered all the southern Russian lands, which eventually passed under the rule of Poland. In 1299, the residence of the Metropolitan was transferred from Kiev to Vladimir, and then to Moscow, and the glorious city of Kiev was gradually reduced to the level of the county town.
In the confrontation with the enemies for the Russian lands, only northern Russia defended them. Ivan III accepts the title of sovereign of all Russia, unites the Russian lands and expels the Horde in 1480.
So, Kievan Rus disappeared, no Ukraine appeared, and before the Pereyaslav Rada, the rule of the Lithuanian and Polish gentry was established on these lands. The South Russian nobility and the local Rurik leaders who had headed it betrayed their people. Among them, Alexander Nevsky and Dmitry Donskoy was not among them, there is not a single name worthy of respect and reverence, they did not remain in history. Traitors deservedly be forgotten descendants.
The nobility went over to the side of the enemies and assimilated from the mercenary motives with the Lithuanian and Polish gentry. There remained the South Russian people without their elite, waiting for its centuries-old fate of serfs and servants, the cities were abandoned and the Polish-Lithuanian government reigned.
This period is unique in Ukrovian historiography. Tell nothing about continuous defeat and humiliation. In the history of the names of only the Lithuanian-Polish gentry and there is nothing Ukrainian.
You want so much glorious history and great achievements! There is nothing simpler: we will invent a story for ourselves! Instead of Rurik, by the will of the myth-makers, the Ukrainian Olgerdovich dynasty appears. The conquerors of southern Russia from the branch of the great Lithuanian princes, Olgerd, Vladimir, Olelka, and Simeon, who ruled these lands and were at enmity with the Poles because of them were declared the “liberators” and supporters of the formation of Ukrainian statehood.
To what baseness can one reach in order to exalt one's enslavers and oppressors to the descendants!
Further more. If you open the history textbook, you can find out that, it turns out, there were even Ukrainian princes. Who are they?
Chartoryi - the grandson of the great Lithuanian prince Olgerd.
Zbarazhsky - Polish nobleman, the crowned stable.
Ostrozhsky - the great Lithuanian hetman.
Vishnevetsky –Polish prince of royal blood.
This is how the history of Ukraine after Kievan Rus is written. After the Mongol invasion in southern Russia, there are no Russians, no Ukrainian princes or nobles, the land was scanty for big names. In the absence of their outstanding personalities, myths are created to justify the worthlessness and betrayal of the southern Russian elite.
Only the Orthodox faith, relegated to the level of the “Khlopas”, remained in the souls of the common people and the priests who kept the traditions of their ancestors.
Virtually nothing remains of Kievan Rus on the lands of the Dnieper; it went north to Vladimir and Moscow, in order to return in 400 years and revive the glorious traditions of Rus.
What kind of continuity of modern Ukraine from ancient Kievan Rus can we talk about if all the spiritual, cultural and secular life of the old Russian state moved to northern Russia, which became the successor of Kievan Rus?
To be continued ...
Video "500 seconds of truth about Ukraine." Myth 1. Ukraine is the successor of Kievan Rus
- Yuri Apukhtin
- 900igr.net
Information