Military Review

Aeroflot buys a large batch of SuperJet aircraft

121
On Monday, PJSC Aeroflot entered into a contract with the United Aircraft Corporation to supply 100 passenger aircraft Superjet 100, reports press office Oak




At the signing ceremony of the contract, held in Vladivostok on the sidelines of the Eastern Economic Forum, was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

At the end of the ceremony, the President expressed the hope that the quality of the aircraft supplied will be at the highest level.

Under the terms of the agreement, liners in a two-class layout (12 seats in the business class cabin and 75 in the economy class cabin) must be handed over to the customer during the period from 2019 to 2026 year.

As noted by the Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov, this is the largest contract in the modern stories civil aircraft construction. He also said that the budget for 2018 includes more than 2 billion rubles of state subsidies for the creation aviation service centers and retraining of aviation personnel for new type aircraft. These measures are intended to support the airline's efforts to develop regional hubs.

According to UAC President Yury Slyusar, Aeroflot has had a great influence on the development of the Superjet project and the domestic aircraft industry as a whole.



To date, 49 SSJ100 aircraft are located in the Aeroflot fleet. In the near future, the 50 airliner will arrive. The first flight of the Superjet 100 took place in June 2011 on the route Moscow - Petersburg. Currently, the aircraft are operated both on domestic and on international airlines, carrying passengers to Bucharest, Dresden, Gothenburg, Vilnius, Riga, Sofia, Zagreb and other cities in Europe.
Photos used:
KLA, aeronautica.online
121 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sanichsan
    Sanichsan 11 September 2018 17: 37
    +44
    how so???? what is going on ??? 2 years ago, experts said in unison that the project was closed. They said that nobody needed a plane. not really screwed up by experts? recourse
    and with SU-57 what, the same garbage? wassat
    1. Shot
      Shot 11 September 2018 17: 50
      +10
      Well, now the howl will begin (cut, etc.) .. Enough is already a disgrace, the USSR was a powerful aircraft building power.
      Everything is for the production of modern civilian aircraft, and it’s difficult and the competition is strong (especially in our government, the easier it is to buy than organize your own ..) Okay, let's see, but be prepared for sabotage and provocation .. The West will not tolerate such competition .. (already there were sabotage with victims)
      1. Tsoy
        Tsoy 11 September 2018 18: 38
        +12
        ..West such competition will not tolerate .. (There have already been sabotage with the victims)


        20-30 Superjet 100 is produced annually. Only BOEING 737 of different generations is collected by 50 per MONTH. This is just one model. It is difficult to call it competition.
        1. Non liberoid Russian
          Non liberoid Russian 11 September 2018 19: 02
          +8
          fifty ? Seriously ? my friend, you would have reduced the number .... the plane is 50+ years old, collected in the region of 50 of all modifications for 10000, if you spread them all the time it turns out 2018 planes a month ... so I'm sorry, but you cheat stop 2016 pieces were officially made in 490, 2017 in 510, recession in 2018, although there were plans to rivet 52 pieces
          1. Tsoy
            Tsoy 11 September 2018 20: 21
            +5
            Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
            50? Seriously ? Dear sir, you’ll turn down the tsiferqu .... 50 + years old aircraft, collected in the 10000 area of ​​all modifications for 2018 year, if you spread them all the time, it turns out 16 airplanes per month ... so sorry, but you’ve been in 2016 officially made 490 pieces, in 2017 510, in 2018 decline, although there were plans for 52 pieces to rivet


            You consider that although it was produced from 60's, it didn’t immediately become so popular and popular. 5000 took off only in 2006 year. So you are grabbing. You need to take into account not 50 years, and 12. And it turns out that over the past 12 years have produced more 5000. And this is an average of 38 boards per month. In 2014, the indicator was at the mark in the 42 board, in 2017 47. This year there were plans for the 52 board, but it did not work out yet. So how not to twist is not a competition.
            1. For example
              For example 12 September 2018 07: 39
              -1
              Choi, we are talking about a contract for 100 Russian aircraft.
              You can fall asleep and wake up praying for a Boeing, but we are talking about the purchase of our aircraft.
              Down and Out trouble started. Further MC21 and foreign markets.
              1. vladimirZ
                vladimirZ 12 September 2018 08: 32
                -3
                ... we are talking about a contract for 100 Russian aircraft.
                You can fall asleep and wake up praying for a Boeing, but we are talking about the purchase of our aircraft. - For instance

                What "Russian" planes? Superjet is only assembled in Russia, 75-80% of components are foreign made!
                How can I bet on an import-dependent aircraft?
                Yes, and according to the performance characteristics - the low location of the engines - a little more than 40 cm from the concrete, will not allow this type of aircraft to be widely used at most of our airports. Where are there still 100 to 50 existing ones?
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. ser56
                  ser56 12 September 2018 18: 18
                  0
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  What "Russian" planes?

                  the aircraft is designed and manufactured in Russia
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  75-80% of components of foreign production!

                  figures at cost, because the ruble fell ... request
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  And according to the performance characteristics - low engine location - a little more than 40 cm from the concrete

                  have you seen near a Boeing 737? IL Airbus 319/20?
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  at most of our airports

                  I will say politely - this is not so ... just look at the Aeroflot schedule ... fool
          2. Lena363
            Lena363 12 September 2018 17: 37
            0
            In general, Boeing produces more than 700 aircraft of all brands every year, Airbus - more than 500! Read 2017 production data
        2. Shot
          Shot 11 September 2018 19: 04
          +11
          Quote: Choi
          generations are collected 50 per month. This is just one model. It’s hard to call it competition.

          Well, considering that "titanium" for their production, Russia supplies aluminum as well .. So it's not over yet! How some here like the United States to praise their "technological superiority" .. During the Soviet era, we had aviation like a taxi in the West ..
          1. Letun
            Letun 11 September 2018 20: 38
            +10
            Quote: Shot
            Well, considering that "titanium" for their production Russia supplies aluminum as well .. So it's not over yet!

            Og, and also from Russian oil they make kerosene, on which these Boeings fly. Indeed, there is something to be proud of. With your optimism and ideas about the economy and the prospects for the development of domestic industry, you have the very place in the government.

            PS I wanted to ask why you wrote titanium in quotation marks, but aluminum without? Is this some kind of meaning I haven’t guessed, or the new rules of the Russian language? wassat
            1. Shot
              Shot 11 September 2018 21: 00
              -3
              Quote: Letun
              PS I wanted to ask why you wrote titanium in quotation marks, but aluminum without? Is this some kind of meaning I haven’t guessed, or the new rules of the Russian language?

              This is how I check some, for "lice" ..)))
          2. Henderson
            Henderson 11 September 2018 21: 29
            -5
            The Russian Empire traded in grain and furs. Modern Russia with oil and other resources. Nothing changes.
            1. Svarog
              Svarog 11 September 2018 22: 12
              +6
              Quote: Henderson
              The Russian Empire traded in grain and furs. Modern Russia with oil and other resources. Nothing changes.

              Forms of government .. Here the USSR traded everything and everything .. There we must return.
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 11 September 2018 23: 33
                +1
                He gave half to friendly regimes for loans, the repayment of which was not required, and the USSR also bought foreign equipment, pipes and grain.
              2. d1975
                d1975 12 September 2018 00: 21
                +2
                It is enough to return a couple of articles from the Criminal Code of the USSR, and everything will be fine, everything will be fine .... hi And we fly in, and swim, and do what is necessary, and not what is only profitable! drinks
                1. Sergej1972
                  Sergej1972 12 September 2018 08: 59
                  0
                  As much as you can write, the Criminal Code of the USSR did not exist. There were CC of the Union republics.
            2. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa 11 September 2018 22: 31
              +15
              Quote: Henderson
              The Russian Empire traded in grain and furs. Modern Russia with oil and other resources. Nothing changes.
              You don’t need to drive a snowstorm! Today we sell the best weapons in the world for $ 15-16 billion. Even NATO countries are buying it! Space, nuclear energy, metal science, microbiology ...
              And you all continue to sing your own song from someone else’s voice!
              1. Dazdranagon
                Dazdranagon 12 September 2018 05: 52
                -1
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                You don’t need to drive a snowstorm! Today we sell the best weapons in the world for $ 15-16 billion. Even NATO countries are buying it! Space, nuclear energy, metal science, microbiology ...
                - With all due respect - Have you read the news for a long time? Everyone and everyone is giving up our weapons under pain of US sanctions - and we can’t do anything, just swallow it. And for the best, I would not shout loudly. It’s better not to recall space at all - dead or good, or not at all - since the age of 15 we have lost our leadership, in this we have 9, the USA and China have 20 + ...
              2. Henderson
                Henderson 12 September 2018 08: 12
                -1
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                Today we sell the best weapons in the world for $ 15-16 billion. Even NATO countries are buying it! Space, nuclear energy, metal science, microbiology ...

                How much does this all take in the budget revenue structure?
          3. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 11 September 2018 22: 20
            +9
            Quote: Shot
            In Soviet times, aviation was like a taxi in the west ..

            Right! A ticket from Kiev (wife of Kiev) to Murmansk cost 45 rubles !!! On my salary, I could fly back and forth weekly, and there was still a comfortable life!
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 11 September 2018 23: 35
              -1
              600 rubles or what was the salary?
              1. not main
                not main 11 September 2018 23: 59
                0
                Quote: Vadim237
                600 rubles or what was the salary?

                In Murmansk, much more.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. Lena363
            Lena363 12 September 2018 17: 41
            0
            Supplies of titanium and aluminum may be denied. Only offers on the market are large and will be bought from other suppliers. And in Russia, enterprises will close and replenish the army of the unemployed. With aluminum already begins. Just don’t talk nonsense about retraining, retraining and other nonsense of exempt workers, and even in single-industry towns. Where there is no other industry besides trade
        3. Yu-81
          Yu-81 11 September 2018 20: 29
          +16
          Yes, do not care about the competition! The main thing is that we produce our own aircraft for ourselves. In this matter, we can be self-sufficient, and this is the path to independence from third countries. This is a definite plus.
          How much can everything in life be measured in money, liquidity, profitability, etc. parameters? The shirt of usurers has really tightly grown to some.
          1. Stirbjorn
            Stirbjorn 11 September 2018 20: 31
            +5
            Quote: yu-xnumx
            The main thing is that we produce our own aircraft for ourselves.

            Still, the engines themselves would produce for their aircraft, otherwise without them the plane would not take off
            1. Yu-81
              Yu-81 11 September 2018 20: 34
              +2
              And it will come to them too.
              And you look in sarcasm, do not choke, otherwise you risk not reaching the day when we start putting our engines on airplanes.
              1. Stirbjorn
                Stirbjorn 11 September 2018 20: 35
                +8
                And then sarcasm ?! - Dry statement of facts
            2. Pete mitchell
              Pete mitchell 11 September 2018 21: 20
              +8
              Quote: Stirbjorn
              Quote: yu-xnumx
              The main thing is that we produce our own aircraft for ourselves.

              Still, the engines themselves would produce for their aircraft, otherwise without them the plane would not take off

              And if it would be necessary to establish after-sales service - then everything would be of the top type and would fly on their planes and sell them. Not everything is going smoothly with the sale: I spoke with a guy from the Irish CityJet yesterday, they were the first to buy Superjet - the plan is ripe for throwing them: and the plane is not bad and it seemed to be certified at London City, but the service is ruining everything, the Irish are tired. Yes, and in Aeroflot everything is not going smoothly with him, which is understandable for the new type, but childhood diseases must be treated and actively.
              1. NN52
                NN52 11 September 2018 22: 19
                -1
                Pete mitchell

                We cure childhood diseases ...
                There is no doubt.
                1. Pete mitchell
                  Pete mitchell 11 September 2018 23: 09
                  +4
                  Dim, I would like not to drag out to see SuperJet equal in Europe, and not only in the sky, the idea was very good. The fact that CityJrt brought him to certification in London City is a very big step forward - not everyone flies there
              2. Stirbjorn
                Stirbjorn 11 September 2018 22: 46
                +5
                Quote: Pete Mitchell
                And if it would be necessary to establish after-sales service - then everything would be of the top type and would fly on their planes and sell them.

                The trouble is that the service again rests on these French engines. As far as I remember, they were cooked up from an engine for the French Air Force and, except for the SSJ, are not placed on any other aircraft. Hence the limited edition and problems with spare parts. The same designers of the MC-21 were more sensible in choosing an engine of a well-known brand, which is used by both Boeing and Airbus. Accordingly, minimal problems with spare parts, and there PD-14 will bring to mind
                1. Pete mitchell
                  Pete mitchell 11 September 2018 23: 13
                  +2
                  Quote: Stirbjorn
                  the trouble is that service rests on these French engines again

                  As they say in Odessa, I won’t say anything for it, I didn’t ask the Irishman what the problem of service was. It is necessary to ask the Aeroflot team, they know.
            3. Svarog
              Svarog 11 September 2018 22: 15
              -2
              Quote: Stirbjorn
              Quote: yu-xnumx
              The main thing is that we produce our own aircraft for ourselves.

              Still, the engines themselves would produce for their aircraft, otherwise without them the plane would not take off

              Engines? What for? Our science taught planes to take off without engines .. Have you not heard of THIS BREAK?
              1. Stirbjorn
                Stirbjorn 11 September 2018 22: 32
                +3
                Quote: Svarog
                Engines? What for? Our science taught planes to take off without engines .. Have you not heard of THIS BREAK?

                Mmm ... with a trampoline ?! : good
            4. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa 11 September 2018 22: 35
              +2
              Quote: Stirbjorn
              Still, the engines themselves would produce for their aircraft, otherwise without them the plane would not take off

              PD-14 is on its way! And after him and PD-35 will go for the "heavyweights". So everything should be fine.
              1. Stirbjorn
                Stirbjorn 11 September 2018 22: 43
                +2
                PD-14 for the regional SSJ is too powerful, there in the distant future PD-7, but this is not a question of the next 5 years hi
              2. Pete mitchell
                Pete mitchell 11 September 2018 23: 15
                0
                Quote: BoA KAA
                Quote: Stirbjorn
                Still, the engines themselves would produce for their aircraft, otherwise without them the plane would not take off

                PD-14 is on its way! And after him and PD-35 will go for the "heavyweights". So everything should be fine.

                Your words yes god in ears
            5. helmi8
              helmi8 11 September 2018 22: 53
              +6
              Quote: Stirbjorn
              Quote: yu-xnumx
              The main thing is that we produce our own aircraft for ourselves.
              Still, the engines themselves would produce for their aircraft, otherwise without them the plane would not take off

              And also the pilots to boot ... Listen to the instructor, who is flying now and who is "driving" in the Federal Air Transport Agency ...
          2. Tsoy
            Tsoy 11 September 2018 20: 56
            +5
            Quote: yu-xnumx
            Do not care about competition! The main thing is that we ourselves produce our own aircraft.


            And what about the Superjet Aviation in Russia wasn’t it? There was a Tu-334. First flight in 1999 year. Long before Sukhoi. Here's a wiki:

            According to the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, this did not happen as a result of market analysis, a study of supply and demand, but due to the fact that the developers of the Federal Target Program Tu-334 are recognized as competitive with respect to the RRJ project


            That is, he was simply thrown away in favor of one comrade with ties who had promised with three boxes, but in the end we have what we have. If Tu-334 were normally sponsored at the beginning of the XXI century, now there would be three players in the regional aircraft market. Embraer Brazilians and Bombardier Canadians would be a real competitor.


          3. d1975
            d1975 12 September 2018 00: 23
            0
            The most important thing is that a generation is growing that does not want to create, this is scary. And those who eat it are very few.
          4. dgonni
            dgonni 12 September 2018 11: 16
            -1
            Self-sufficient superjet? laughing It contains 77% of imported components! for engines it’s better not to speak at all. In fact, it can be called a large-site assembly of imported components.
          5. Lena363
            Lena363 12 September 2018 17: 42
            0
            Good self-sufficiency if 90% of the fleet is imported! How many years does it take to replace them?
        4. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 11 September 2018 22: 10
          +11
          Quote: Choi
          20-30 Superjet 100 is produced annually. Only BOEING 737 of different generations is collected by 50 per MONTH. This is just one model. It is difficult to call it competition.

          And there should not be any competition in the revival of the domestic civil aircraft industry. There must be a harsh Russian PROTECTIONISM and Aeroflot preferences! Plus service at the Boeing / Airbas level. And how without it? It’s impossible without it today, no way!
        5. sir_obs
          sir_obs 11 September 2018 22: 23
          +3
          Only BOEING 737 different generations collect 50 each month.


          2015 is a record year for both companies, Boeing - 762 aircraft, Airbus - 670 aircraft = 1430 units
          2014 - Boeing 723 aircraft, Airbus - 629 aircraft = 1352 units
          2013 - Boeing - 648, Airbus - 626 = 1274 units

          The total number of all models
      2. Non liberoid Russian
        Non liberoid Russian 11 September 2018 18: 54
        -6
        come on, let them understand ... what to take from them, girls
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 11 September 2018 19: 33
        -3
        In civil aviation, the USSR has always been catching up with Western manufacturers.
        1. Grizzly 88
          Grizzly 88 11 September 2018 20: 01
          -1
          Unfortunately it's true
        2. Prisoner
          Prisoner 11 September 2018 20: 24
          +7
          You are apparently not very familiar with the history of civil aviation of the USSR.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 11 September 2018 21: 48
            -2
            Already know
        3. Svarog
          Svarog 11 September 2018 22: 17
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          In civil aviation, the USSR has always been catching up with Western manufacturers.

          Catching up with western producers and depending on western producers .. do you feel the difference? It is also like modern Russia and the USSR
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 11 September 2018 23: 26
            0
            All depend on each other - cooperation, a market economy. Boeing depends on our production and parts made of titanium
    2. bolt
      bolt 11 September 2018 18: 07
      0
      Quote: SanichSan
      how so???? what is going on ??? 2 years ago, experts said in unison that the project was closed. They said that nobody needed a plane. not really screwed up by experts? recourse
      and with SU-57 what, the same garbage? wassat


      It looks like you won't get an answer. To those "experts" from this message, I suppose, came the "pap".

      It remains to regret that not for long.
    3. Lex.
      Lex. 11 September 2018 18: 28
      0
      2011 169 cars are not enough to be honest
    4. kapitan92
      kapitan92 11 September 2018 19: 16
      +3
      Quote: SanichSan
      how so???? what is going on ??? 2 years ago, experts said in unison that the project was closed. They said that nobody needed a plane. not really screwed up by experts?

      Nope! Didn't screw up! Nobody needs it abroad, but it will work for "interior", all the same, there is nothing better domestic.
      1. faiver
        faiver 11 September 2018 19: 26
        +3
        still there is nothing better than domestic.
        - there is nothing else in production from the word at all
        1. kapitan92
          kapitan92 11 September 2018 19: 29
          +3
          Quote: faiver
          - there is nothing else in production from the word at all

          Andrew, hi ! Don't be pessimistic, we have MC 21 on the way. smile
    5. faiver
      faiver 11 September 2018 19: 29
      -3
      Quote: SanichSan
      2 years ago, experts said in unison that the project was closed. they said that nobody needed a plane
      - the Kremlin ordered to carry lumines, but whoever doesn’t like it will carry lugs ... that’s the whole answer ...
      1. jjj
        jjj 11 September 2018 19: 44
        +7
        Only half of the news is said. A very important point was left out of the spotlight. Aeroflot is starting to create regional hubs for connections. Now only through Sheremetyevo or Pulkovo, taking into account "Russia". It was for these purposes that it took a hundred "Su-95"
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 11 September 2018 22: 52
          +1
          Quote: jjj
          it took a hundred "Su-95"

          Is this a spelling mistake, or I don't know something about the new plane (!) "Su-95"?
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 11 September 2018 22: 48
        +3
        Quote: faiver
        - the Kremlin ordered to carry lumines, but whoever doesn’t like it will carry lugs ... that’s the whole answer ...

        The Kremlin decided correctly: to feed their manufacturer and fly on their own, rather than leased, planes. Sanctions can also apply to them, then walk on foot. We will not allow foreign carriers on domestic airlines, for reasons of state security. Apparently, the era of kitchen thinkers and politicians is still going on. It's time to rise to the state level!
  2. The black
    The black 11 September 2018 17: 37
    +17
    It is high time to replace the aging fleet of Boeing with new modern domestic-made vehicles. Recently I flew on such an old Boeing, so it seemed to me that in flight he flapped his wings like a bird. ))))) ... already in wasap, the will began to type wassat
    1. Sanichsan
      Sanichsan 11 September 2018 17: 38
      +12
      Quote: Black
      It is high time to change the aging fleet of Boeing

      what they are working on. over there and the MS is on the way.
      1. d ^ Amir
        d ^ Amir 11 September 2018 17: 51
        +7
        IL-114 identity to the piggy bank ... flight range of 1500 km ...
      2. Wedmak
        Wedmak 11 September 2018 17: 54
        +10
        Moreover, if memory serves, the MS-21 already has contracts.
    2. Troll
      Troll 11 September 2018 17: 52
      +12
      To tell the truth, all letaki "flap their wings". This is laid down and calculated in the design
    3. Bull Terrier
      Bull Terrier 11 September 2018 18: 04
      0
      They wave all the time))) the first time, too, a little testament did not start writing)))
  3. afrikanez
    afrikanez 11 September 2018 17: 41
    +9
    It seems that if it were not for the presence of Putin, the contract would not have been signed soon. lol The plane is good, just remove all imported components from it and it will be absolutely "for ..... good"
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 11 September 2018 18: 09
      +4
      Quote: afrikanez
      The plane is good, only remove all imported components from it

      What is gradually being done. Not in an instant, everything can be replaced.
  4. Troll
    Troll 11 September 2018 17: 45
    +6
    must be transferred to the customer from 2019 to 2016.


    Uh, correct the numbers. Or do I not understand something?
  5. d ^ Amir
    d ^ Amir 11 September 2018 17: 49
    +8
    in the presence of Vladimir Vladimirovich ..... the Russian language speaking declared to the whole world - Boeing and airbases will not be acquired more !!! and most likely soon imported cars older than certain ages will be removed from the lines in order to increase the demand for their ...
    1. faiver
      faiver 11 September 2018 18: 53
      +3
      which one? we do not build anything except ssg on such a scale ...
    2. jjj
      jjj 11 September 2018 19: 45
      +4
      Quote: d ^ Amir
      and most likely soon imported cars older than certain ages will be removed from the lines

      Aeroflot has a very fresh fleet
    3. Berkut154
      Berkut154 12 September 2018 00: 18
      +1
      Yeah, and now the question is: on the Aeroflot side there is the mark of Sky Tiim. What would it mean for the carrier do not tell me?
  6. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 11 September 2018 17: 53
    +3
    Correct the jamb with the date, because it is impossible to build airplanes today, but to transfer them to Aeroflot in the past, 2016! !!
  7. Igoresha
    Igoresha 11 September 2018 18: 06
    0
    few people know (c) the Aeroflot logo that right now in the picture in the article was created by an English advertising agency - they won the competition.
  8. Larum
    Larum 11 September 2018 18: 11
    +3
    Boeing, which was bought by Medvedev in '8, is likely to end.
    So we decided to purchase our. And to grab subsidies for this case.
    Not only amers to help the government
  9. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 11 September 2018 18: 26
    +2
    Farting did not stop, and Sukhoi only nourishes his enemies ... the service is terrible, the prices for repair are scrap, the terms are still those. I don’t know how Aeroflot is, but Yakutia butts with the injuries of the SSJ. And so beautiful - 100 already released + order for 100 pcs + order 75 shortened and import-substituted C7 and government agencies. Import-substituted should still go to Iran.
    1. faiver
      faiver 11 September 2018 18: 59
      +3
      Yakutia butts with injuries of the SSJ
      - The company’s management said that in fact the summer season was disrupted due to the CSW, and they were forced to admit it when, due to failed superjets, almost a dozen regular flights already had a delay of TWO DAYS. But today, the airline said that it does not intend to abandon these aircraft - apparently hiccuped from Moscow ...
      there are no exchange engines, engine service is only in one place somewhere in Europe, in Mexico only a part of the purchased superjets fly, the rest stand as donors ...
  10. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 11 September 2018 18: 28
    +3
    +4 more

    Gelendzhik. September 08. AviaPort - State Transport Leasing Company (STLC) and Severstal Aviation Enterprise during the 12th International Exhibition and Scientific Conference on Hydroaviation Gidroaviasalon-2018, which is taking place these days in Gelendzhik, signed an agreement of intent to transfer to the financial leasing of four Superjet 100 aircraft in 2018-2019.

    The signing ceremony took place in the presence of the Minister of Industry and Trade of Russia Denis Manturov. The document was signed by STLC General Director Sergei Khramagin and Nikolai Ivanovsky, Head of Severstal Aviation Enterprise.

    The agreement provides for the transfer of four SSJ2018s to financial leasing in 2019-100 with an option to supply two more aircraft. The lease term will be 12 years. It is assumed that SSJ100 with winglets will be supplied to Severstal. The planes will be designed to carry 100 economy class passengers (there is an option of rearranging up to 85 seats in economy and 8 in business). SSJ100 with winglets are capable of taking off / landing from shorter runways. In addition, they consume less fuel: compared to other SSJ100 modifications, the savings are 3-4%.
  11. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 11 September 2018 18: 29
    +2
    Aeroflot intends to increase the smooth flight time of new Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft to 75%, and is developing an after-sales service program with the aircraft manufacturer, Sukhoi Civil Aircraft (SCA), said Vitaly Savelyev, the airline's general director.

    Earlier this week, the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) and Aeroflot signed an agreement under the WEF for the supply of another 100 SSJ100 aircraft. The agreement provides for the supply of aircraft in the period from 2019 to 2026. At the moment the airline operates 49 aircraft of this type, the 50th SSJ100 is expected.

    "The program provides for mutual obligations. For example, we will create our own acceptance commissions in Komsomolsk-on-Amur at each stage of SSJ100 preparation, we will build linear stations where the cars will fly so that they have technical support. obligations to provide not only spare parts, but also after-sales service of aircraft, so we have all the obligations that we regularly check, there was already the first meeting after we signed, where we look, who succeeded, what problems there are, we act as partners, "Saveliev told reporters on the sidelines of the EEF.

    Saveliev added that the airline also undertakes to bring the smooth flight time of these vessels up to 75%. "This is quite significant, and we will have greater efficiency. This is precisely why the purchase of new aircraft is connected, because this is a different modification - they winglets, a rather deep modernization of the aircraft took place, and we very much hope that this aircraft will take into account all the comments that were made during the operation of previous aircraft, "he stressed.

    The head of Aeroflot noted that 75% of the SSJ100's no-fly raid should be achieved within one to two years. “We also have an agreement with the SCAC on the aircraft used, they will start replacing the aircraft that we operate with new ones during the next year, in parallel with the delivery,” Saveliev added.
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 12 September 2018 00: 56
      +2
      Well nifiga yourself awareness! Readers can provide more information than journalists! Soon, journalists will probably ask the topic of information, and readers will post information in the comments!
  12. exo
    exo 11 September 2018 18: 55
    +4
    So, soon to learn Superjet. Even interesting :)
  13. Tarasios
    Tarasios 11 September 2018 19: 16
    +7
    Quote: crashing
    Quote: SanichSan
    how so???? what is going on ??? 2 years ago, experts said in unison that the project was closed. They said that nobody needed a plane. not really screwed up by experts? recourse
    and with SU-57 what, the same garbage? wassat


    It looks like you won't get an answer. To those "experts" from this message, I suppose, came the "pap".

    It remains to regret that not for long.

    one of the key features of all "experts" is the ability to change shoes while jumping. After that, with the same pathos and "oppressive authority", they will carry any other blizzard, not a little not caring about their own past words, conscience, morality and other rudiments;) So - that's for whom I never worry - it's for the share experts) These are such metamorphic mutants that they will adapt everywhere;)
  14. faiver
    faiver 11 September 2018 19: 19
    +2
    It would be interesting to see the statistics of how often Aeroflot replaces faulty SSZs with spare sides ...
    1. Chicha squad
      Chicha squad 11 September 2018 19: 33
      +1
      The plane is not very different from the filling on the airbus.
      1. faiver
        faiver 11 September 2018 22: 00
        0
        but it is very different in quality and service
  15. mvg
    mvg 11 September 2018 19: 36
    +5
    On the plane, up to 50% of foreign, including French Snecma engines (assembly Rybinsk), so what is it domestic?
  16. tcidar
    tcidar 11 September 2018 19: 36
    -1
    And what is domestic in it?
    Armchairs?
    1. _Ugene_
      _Ugene_ 11 September 2018 19: 59
      +6
      about half of the plane, now this is a common thing, it does not always make sense to do everything in one country from an economic point of view
      1. mvg
        mvg 11 September 2018 21: 59
        +2
        do in one country

        It's okay that we are under sanctions and "import substitution" is just words. For 25 years, Russia was able to master only 1 !!! new civilian engine (PS-14) for MS-21. And who will make avionics on the western components. Rybinsk is an engine assembler. Part of the engine comes from France.
        By the way, how much Russia after the USSR mastered new aircraft? That's exactly not at all. All these joint projects with Antonov went down the drain, the Il-114 still does not fly, the SuperJet is not ours, and nothing is heard about the airbus.
        PS: Now the Chinese and the new transporter launched the Y-20, and the civilian S-919 and a bunch of projects ... and we will only modernize the Soviet legacy.
        1. _Ugene_
          _Ugene_ 11 September 2018 22: 29
          +1
          it’s not so simple, it will be profitable to do everything at home only with serious export, our market is too small for full localization, and export problems, all niches are densely occupied by Boeing and airbuses, for example, now the production of the SSJ-100 and MC-21 is decently subsidized and if in the future there will be no noticeable export of these models, then production will be forced to stay on state. subsidies i.e. virtually unprofitable
          1. mvg
            mvg 11 September 2018 22: 52
            0
            there will be no noticeable export of these models

            And who will we move from the market? Boeing or Europe? And also a Chinese (a direct competitor to MC-21) and a Brazilian embryer (Latin America) and all will enter the market ... All players are noticeably stronger and will not give up their niche. We will fly on used Boeings and Aeroflot MC-21s, on some J7 companies that fly "where Makar did not drive calves."
            PS: The Department of Internal Affairs is no longer there, where it was possible by order to "suck" Il-86 and Yak-42 with Tu-154.
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 12 September 2018 13: 26
      0
      Salon at CCJ Recardo .....
  17. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 11 September 2018 19: 37
    0
    Quote: faiver
    It would be interesting to see the statistics of how often Aeroflot replaces faulty SSZs with spare sides ...

    There (in the article) it is also said about the deployment of a Superjet maintenance network in the territory of the Russian Federation, which means that there will be no questions about replacement and service / repair.
  18. Conductor
    Conductor 11 September 2018 19: 54
    +2
    Our experts have sensitive senses, and the wind of change blew into their ears a new opening.
  19. faiver
    faiver 11 September 2018 19: 58
    +4
    Quote: kapitan92
    MC 21 on the way

    sorry how many of these approaches will be?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 11 September 2018 20: 01
      +1
      279 aircraft - until the 30th I think they can handle it.
  20. exo
    exo 11 September 2018 20: 03
    +3
    Quote: faiver
    Yakutia butts with injuries of the SSJ
    - The company’s management said that in fact the summer season was disrupted due to the CSW, and they were forced to admit it when, due to failed superjets, almost a dozen regular flights already had a delay of TWO DAYS. But today, the airline said that it does not intend to abandon these aircraft - apparently hiccuped from Moscow ...
    there are no exchange engines, engine service is only in one place somewhere in Europe, in Mexico only a part of the purchased superjets fly, the rest stand as donors ...

    Not the lack of exchange engines is alarming. This is a solvable issue. But the fact that of the ten engines that are available in the a / c of Yakutia, all have structurally-manufacturing defects. And they are controlled. And this already means: either a miscalculation of the designers, or a low quality of production. Well, the a / c has to perform additional inspections on these SAM-146, which lengthens the time for maintenance.
  21. Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 September 2018 20: 07
    +5
    Aeroflot is doing the right thing, its needs to be supported. And to be honest, I don’t know how, but my soul somehow trusts our planes more.
  22. Glory1974
    Glory1974 11 September 2018 20: 45
    +7
    On Monday, Aeroflot PJSC concluded a contract with the United Aircraft Corporation for the supply of 100 Superjet 100 passenger aircraft, the UAC press service reports.
    At the signing ceremony of the contract, held in Vladivostok on the sidelines of the Eastern Economic Forum, was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    This is certainly great. But my heart senses that Aeroflot was pressured using administrative resources. But most importantly, the preferences for the purchase of imported aircraft by our airlines, including used ones, such as the absence of VAT and non-payment of customs duties, have not been canceled. And all this was introduced to crush our aviation industry.
    Therefore, the main obstacle to the development of the civil aviation industry has not been removed.
  23. Prisoner
    Prisoner 11 September 2018 20: 46
    +1
    So much for the money in domestic civil aviation. Looks like our statesmen found clear words for money bags. laughing
  24. Warrior Spirit
    Warrior Spirit 11 September 2018 20: 49
    -5
    All this is complete nonsense and nonsense. Forcing the signing of a contract with Putin standing behind is an indicator of ANYONE DO NOT NEED A PLANE.
    Only export deliveries, for normal money, can be an indicator of the success of a project.
  25. Warrior Spirit
    Warrior Spirit 11 September 2018 20: 53
    -5
    Quote: Vlad5307
    Quote: faiver
    It would be interesting to see the statistics of how often Aeroflot replaces faulty SSZs with spare sides ...

    There (in the article) it is also said about the deployment of a Superjet maintenance network in the territory of the Russian Federation, which means that there will be no questions about replacement and service / repair.
    - i.e. at the stage of creating the aircraft and the devil already knows what period of operation, did not think about it? Now all of a sudden:
    - Boys !!! All these years, we behaved like fools! It turns out that it was necessary to sign an agreement on the deployment of a maintenance network !!!
    - Valera !!! Do not be noisy!!! As we thought about maintenance, so we created the plane ...
    1. faiver
      faiver 11 September 2018 21: 57
      +4
      are you surprised by this? I will give an example from a slightly different region - in 2006, a "health national project" was launched in the Republic (Sakha) of Yakutia, 85 new ambulance vehicles of various configurations were allocated for this national project. But no one inquired which cars are optimal for the harsh northern conditions, and 85 Gazelles with all-wheel drive running on 92nd gasoline arrived in the republic. Out of 85 cars, less than 30 cars got into the cities, and the rest went to the remote countryside. And what is the result? No one thought that the gazelle was larger than an UAZ nurse and problems began with garages, no one thought that fuel for medical institutions was released according to state limits and there were protected limits for the 80th gasoline, and there was no 92nd gasoline, no one thought that these cars come with computers with sensors and other things, and that it is not realistic to diagnose a breakdown in a remote village 300-1000 km from the city, no one thought that an overweight gazelle, even with all-wheel drive, could not drive on soggy country roads, no one thought that cars for the north should be warmed. But how beautifully all this was presented - solemn construction of new cars, ribbons, speeches. As a result, in cities and nearby settlements, these cars, in principle, worked, but everything that was further 200 km from the cities simply stood near hospitals as monuments - this is about 50 new ambulances. Approximately a couple of weeks after receiving the cars and putting them into operation, all the limits on the 92nd gasoline at our enterprise were exhausted, the officials answered a natural question on fuel - the question is under consideration, when did I ask what to refuel the cars in three days I was answered put the cars on a joke - i.e. bureaucrats reported that the machines were put into operation and then at least the grass will not grow ... And in everything we have so ... hi
  26. Conductor
    Conductor 11 September 2018 21: 04
    0
    Aeroflot stewardesses are dressed in a slightly annoying orange uniform.
    1. Prisoner
      Prisoner 11 September 2018 21: 21
      +1
      Would you like the flight attendants to be in negligee? laughing
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 12 September 2018 13: 27
        0
        Watching what ... in Aeroflot - YES! In UTair - NO!
  27. BRJ
    BRJ 11 September 2018 21: 49
    -2
    And what to do? Fly on what you need?!) Ukraine has disappeared. Europeans under sanctions are not ready to help the Russian Federation.
    We will "fly" on our own))
  28. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 11 September 2018 22: 00
    0
    Katza, our specialists and officials managed to lull the West with respect to our SSJ100 and create a wonderful aircraft for both domestic and international transport. And now you need to switch to your engines and components of Russian production for this liner. And then our wide-body MC 21 will be ready soon. So we got rid of Boeing and other foreigners.
  29. Branch
    Branch 11 September 2018 23: 47
    0
    Well, at least something does not cause shame and disgust for the decisions of our government (for now ...)
    SSS seems to be a good car; poor service and the absence of a serious operator interfere with selling well for export - that’s where Aeroflot’s Directorate was set up. As there will be a large park, the service will change qualitatively. Here all our a.k. it is necessary to put pressure on the procurement of ssl - healthy protectionism).
    As we will have a lot of them, export will go, the manufacturer has a name and reputation, and the presence of European suppliers removes barriers from their markets. Yes, and in his niche, Boeing and Basik are not particularly played.
    Ms21 will follow in his footsteps.
    Well, according to preferences for imported aircraft - and so the prices are very high for a / tickets and there’s nothing else to get from. Here are the Tupolevs - and the Tu-214 was not bad and supported, but to no purpose - neither do it massively, nor sell, nor organize the service.
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 12 September 2018 13: 29
      +1
      The very niche of the SSS (Bombardier) in our country is poorly developed, there are few regional transportations and less money there. With the MS-21, the situation is different - 70% of the world’s fleet is its niche (with + and - aircraft options).
      1. Branch
        Branch 12 September 2018 22: 47
        0
        Therefore, apparently with the SSJ and started. If it becomes a recognizable and established brand, the MC21 will pull it with a trailer. In the meantime, the essence and the matter in their a / c will replace the air junk of bobiks and basics - there with full productivity for ten years of work. And the production lines are under construction corresponding to it. And not like the Tupolev - with a sin in half 3 sides a year (although of course they are not mainly their fault). For any production, loading and uninterrupted operation is very important.
        Bombardier, as I read the statements, will objectively be weaker.
        I like this project, to use the name of dry and Italian-French cooperation to call relatively painlessly into the bourgeois market and provide my own. Here are just a surname Slusar can mess up everything.
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 14 September 2018 16: 10
          0
          If they solve problems with the service and import substitute ... why not ?! I fly on it periodically - a mini A-319 .. and competitors are much closer.
  30. Altona
    Altona 12 September 2018 08: 15
    0
    Quote: Shot
    Well, now the howl will begin (cut, etc.) .. Enough is already a shame

    ---------------------
    A plane with a low localization of components, about nothing.
  31. zyzx
    zyzx 12 September 2018 09: 50
    +2
    Quote: vladimirZ
    What "Russian" planes? Superjet is only assembled in Russia, 75-80% of components are foreign made!

    Well, in the Boeing Dreamliner, 90% of foreign components, and why Americans do not cheat about this?
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 12 September 2018 13: 31
      +1
      The shortened 75-seat version for C7 will be more localized and it can already be exported without US permissions. Further, according to this scheme, the usual SSJ100 will go.
  32. Tarasios
    Tarasios 12 September 2018 15: 38
    0
    Quote: zyzx
    Quote: vladimirZ
    What "Russian" planes? Superjet is only assembled in Russia, 75-80% of components are foreign made!

    Well, in the Boeing Dreamliner, 90% of foreign components, and why Americans do not cheat about this?

    The team did not boil;)
  33. Lena363
    Lena363 12 September 2018 17: 35
    +1
    There was a note that this aircraft is already being abandoned in Yakutia, because the parts are breaking down, and spare parts are not available. Airplanes stand idle without generating revenue.
  34. ser56
    ser56 12 September 2018 18: 13
    +1
    Nice airplane, flew a couple of times ... hi
  35. Apollo
    Apollo 12 September 2018 23: 13
    0
    The contract is certainly good, but there is some catch that is not covered. What is it, I hope we will find out later.