Will the Russian Aerospace Forces strike at the US military base in Syria?

125
This question is connected with the publication in the American press. Moreover, it is in the USA that they are trying to find out if there is enough iron in the actions of Russia - whether the Russian Aerospace Forces will be able to hit the territory where the military base is located.

The American television channel CNN comes out with a report, which tells about the warning from Russia to the American military in Syria. CNN claims that Russia allegedly warned the United States that the Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft and the Syrian government army were ready to attack one of the areas in the south of the SAR, in whose territory there are also representatives of the American contingent.



The report stated that, according to Moscow, the US military is in the territories that are controlled by the militants.



From the material of the American TV channel:
These statements from Moscow raise concerns about the security of the American military in Syria.


What kind of territory are we talking about? And the territory is the one on which the American military base “Et-Tanf” is located. This base is located near the border with Jordan. On CNN, it’s stated that the Al-Tanf military base is "key to fighting terrorism that the United States is conducting, and at the same time it is causing friction between the positions of the two countries."

What kind of fight against terrorism in this case is meant, if the base itself is located where militants are hosted, who often exit the gate of Al-Tanfa, not reported to CNN.

In the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation material CNN has not yet commented. Russian media have already filed requests to the main military department for a reaction to the American publication.

Recall that a few days ago, a group of terrorists attempted to make progress in the direction of Palmyra, moving forward precisely from the side of Al-Tanfa. Promotion was stopped by the Syrian military and the Russian Aerospace Forces.
  • Facebook
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

125 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    7 September 2018 15: 39
    There is no question of how to beat or not to beat a classic - here you need to beat, and really, really hard! And the United States, they are uninvited, unexpected there, they will experience on themselves that such a missile and bomb strike.
    1. +6
      7 September 2018 15: 42
      We’ll hurt, but carefully (s) and you don’t steal ... (s)
      1. +3
        7 September 2018 16: 47
        Like the Crimea, without a single shot.
        1. +1
          7 September 2018 16: 52
          Like the Crimea, without a single shot.

          I, too, have the same opinion. Squeeze out on snoring (!)
          ATS will bypass the Americans and take control of the border. And we will take the blockade of the American bases of At-Tanf and also the camp of Rukban. The main thing is that they be MTR, not PMCs.
          * U.S. extrusion operations: C-300 in Palmyra, and 2 Tor-M2 at Et-Tanf, and a patrol from 2 Su-30СМ or ​​Su-35С
          1. +2
            7 September 2018 17: 52
            I also agree, a direct collision is not necessary, but Americans can be squeezed out ..
            1. +6
              7 September 2018 18: 43
              The Americans need to be squeezed out by information pressure in the world media with direct evidence - photos of militant camps, their exercises, clusters and marches with weapons. (photo from UAVs and ground-based ones with "bindings"), buy pages of well-known world media outlets and publish under the name of "independent" journalists ... timidly and not hear anyone deny ... If cats do not catch mice, they are replaced by young ones, this is about the SVR and others ...
              1. -2
                7 September 2018 19: 49
                Amerikosov needs to be squeezed out by information pressure in the world media

                Before that, we had not yet grown, We are learning current (!) laughing
                The main thing is that then the USA and England - do not start spitting from us, now they are teaching how not to do it (!) laughing
    2. +7
      7 September 2018 15: 53
      We need a comprehensive blockade of the United States WB, and not allow convoys to it. You can exit, but you cannot enter ... The most ancient hello! I’ve changed the flag. hi
      1. +5
        7 September 2018 15: 59
        Impossible. If Iraq can still be pulled up, Shiites are in power there now. So Jordan is not. Therefore, through Jordan there will be a supply of everything.
        1. +2
          7 September 2018 17: 45
          Well, they sit there and sit in the desert, there is nothing besides silicon, neither oil nor water. Wait for the provocation, and then wet it. They will be the first to hit, the Americans will remind of themselves and very cool to remind. I think this is a muscle game. Now they are crowded around Idlib
    3. -1
      7 September 2018 16: 15
      Purely human, I want to embed. And good. But how will it look politically? A country with a small share in the global economy (consider a banana country) has slapped the leader. The consequences are not difficult to guess. I also want such a flag. How to do it?
      1. +1
        7 September 2018 16: 35
        I’ll buy everything, I said gold, I’ll take everything, I said damask!
      2. LMN
        +5
        7 September 2018 17: 35
        Quote: Mr Credo
        Purely human, I want to embed. And good. But how will it look politically? A country with a small share in the global economy (consider a banana country) has slapped the leader. The consequences are not difficult to guess. I also want such a flag. How to do it?


        A country with a small share in the global economy (consider a banana country), slapped the leader

        This "banana country" from your words (apparently we are talking about the Russian Federation), with such "slaps", tore off the heads of Napaleon and Hitler for example Yes

        I also want such a flag. How to do it?

        And ask Skripal .. Yes
      3. +4
        7 September 2018 18: 30
        Quote: Mister Creed
        I also want such a flag. How to do it?

        Going for permanent residence under the link - business then! laughing
        1. LMN
          +5
          7 September 2018 18: 41
          Quote: BoA KAA
          Quote: Mister Creed
          I also want such a flag. How to do it?

          Going for permanent residence under the link - business then! laughing

          It is also an option laughing
          You can by the way with blacks across France or Italy, by sea (if you suddenly like the sea lol )
          You can go through Libya or Syria, just personally you can see what to "bomb" wink
    4. +2
      7 September 2018 16: 43
      Yes, you are a cavalryman, my friend. Checker left and right. And the prospects of the third world, how do you?
      1. +2
        7 September 2018 18: 21
        There is a limit to everything, and if you follow your logic, then it was probably better not to start fighting with the Germans at 41, because the Great Patriotic War and the already underway World War II became the prospect, YES we are against these world wars, but I will repeat ALL THERE IS A LIMIT and if you hope that here we will give up our interests, then everything will end there, NO, the third world war is approaching, but it's a matter of time and no one is waving a saber here, it is not we who are sending the "infection" and they will not be satisfied with it ... The United States lives off wars, their entire economy is based on wars, which is why they need these conflicts around the world so much
    5. +1
      7 September 2018 18: 09
      I agree with you, but following the classics, you need to start with a warning shot, and this should be bombarded around the perimeter of the base so that funnels remain everywhere, and out of fear they are so much frustrated that they don’t even have a question to leave them or not doubted that the next time they would become the target.
    6. -1
      7 September 2018 18: 56
      Quote: ANCIENT
      need to beat, and very, very strong! ...

      It is high time! there is nothing to chew snot, we are there legally, and the United States are pirates
    7. +1
      7 September 2018 19: 15
      You are well aware that there will most likely not be a "hot phase".
      Everything will stretch for a while yet. Pind wasps will cling to the last, and ours will try to deprive them of any opportunity to stay in Syria. But quickly it just will not end.
      Even if the "Pind-Osiya" launches a missile strike on the SAR, it will do it very carefully, measuring a hundred times and warning our people about it ten times. Because despite all the outward manifestations of the Pind-Wasps with their saber rattling and loud threatening statements, they will try to avoid open confrontation with Russia to the last. You can run into a "response". And "at home" will not understand ...
    8. SSR
      0
      7 September 2018 21: 23
      Quote: ANCIENT
      There is no question of how to beat or not to beat a classic - here you need to beat, and really, really hard! And the United States, they are uninvited, unexpected there, they will experience on themselves that such a missile and bomb strike.

      That very rare case. - for a violator of World norms, according to the same norms, zvizdanut, violation of "norms".
      I do not like to break, but it is necessary.
    9. 0
      8 September 2018 08: 29
      There will be nothing. Russia did not respond even after the assassination of Zakharchenko. And the USA is not Ukraine. Here on television, tales can tell this and people can fool around. And before motrasniki tremble and trickles flow on the little frogs.
      1. -1
        8 September 2018 18: 50
        Ukraine cannot fart without a team, hands have not grown to Zakharchenko. As for Russia, the result will be the same as with Wagner.
    10. 0
      8 September 2018 16: 30
      Once already "answered". The question is not whether you are ready or not? The question is whether there is political will and strength, or again, as under the Eltsin in Pristina, a blank shot. The army tensed, fulfilled, but the politician got rid of it at best.
  2. +6
    7 September 2018 15: 43
    Who allowed the Americans to set up their bases in Syria ?! negative Answer - NOBODY is aggression, occupation, seizure, attack, robbery, etc. Therefore, Americans need to throw off leaflets and so that their spirit is not there for 48 hours, after which the whole base to be destroyed in ruins !!! stop angry
    1. +7
      7 September 2018 15: 58
      They do not recognize Assad as legitimate - therefore, leaflets will not fly up. Through the UN they cannot be kicked out. By force - the answer to Tartus and Khmemim will fly. Because the bases have the same status - they are officially recognized by the states (USA / Russia).
    2. +8
      7 September 2018 16: 18
      Quote: keeper03
      Who allowed the Americans to set up their bases in Syria ?! Answer - NOBODY is aggression, occupation, seizure, attack, robbery, etc.

      A simple conclusion follows from this - Russia, on an initiative basis, will not strike at the American base for the reason that the Syrian side has both international and moral law and all the military capabilities necessary for this. For the stated purposes in Syria, Russia has designated the fight against terrorists and the preservation of statehood. A VKS strike against the Americans is possible only if they themselves strike a blow at the Russian military. Something like this...
      1. +1
        7 September 2018 18: 27
        Quote: Nyrobsky


        Nyrobsky

        Russia will not hit, it is in the aspen nest of NATO, which is the entire water area of ​​Mediterranean, arranges a war with the Basmachis _ /// dash, the second Vietnam ////// Nyrobsky, this is our key to pressure our partners. This is our sound logic --- we We do not want attacks on our border guards by ISIS national gangs. We will bind them with a war in Syria and there we will designate a line for NATO. Hikhanki, but this is a united front, because. we can respond to the strategic offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine only by increasing activity in the eastern regions of the Mediterranean and strikes on concentrated centers THEREFORE ... the Russian army and navy are in the complex, increasing their skills, and the enemy of terrorism remains in the losers. NATO is closely following this struggle , straits and east-east. The strips are in full readiness. Let me remind you that the eastern Mediterranean is an internal NATO area. THERE IS a special area, there is a flotilla on duty. Stupid rumors that "Ustinov" acquired British aircraft from Akrotiriya and Dhekelia ---- there is not ONE confirmation from the camp of the enemy, which means that this is just a sugary fake. And not a fake is what our elite did - kick money into everything that pleases /// world championships, tracks, Rashi's image, finally. // / The whole image of Rashi lays the oligarchic team of Putin on their super-expensive galleys. That's why I stay away from the talk about avi or expeditionary. No, you can talk a lot about the usefulness of these units, but thought, guys? Do you think they will appear from this? more ... with such anticipating articles, it creates the feeling that we will have everything, but then. Enough, ate. Good ... I would cut myself, so that I or my neighbor in the country, I am a Volzhan, Samara) would have to put my boats in the bay. So no, the boats are put in the bay, and it is not clear which Russians are Rusich Usmanovs, or friends PU Rotenbergs ------ these persons suddenly enrich themselves against the background of the impoverishment of the proletariat. I understand the algorithm, I want to listen to the arguments of the defenders oligarchs.
  3. +3
    7 September 2018 15: 44
    in the south of the SAR, in the territory of which there are also representatives of the American contingent.
    Only one question: what the hell are they doing there? The fight against terrorism is impossible to call, for objective reasons. And then. that the Americans are declaring, just excuses, their presence in Syria.
    1. 0
      7 September 2018 20: 21
      Quote: afrikanez
      Only one question: what the hell are they doing there?

      Good question ... NATO is providing support and response on its southern flank with its involvement in the affairs of the Middle East. And it provides support for its strategic ally in this region. Israel ... if China is close to the people's revolution, then there is always a platform, to control Suez. This bridgehead is Israel, because. in their warehouses everything needed for two American heavy divisions of the old model is stored. Therefore, it was never a big problem for NATO to go through the sands and begin to control SUEC. The Egyptian army is generally instead of the watchman's grandfather, because. the spear point is aimed at Iran. The Afghan kink of the war between the PRC and the United States will lead to the emergence of Chinese bases in Tajikistan and in Kirghizia with a creeping virus throughout our former Central Asia. This is an irreversible process, the Chinese are still climbing into this theater of operations. This gives them one more markets, and most importantly, ways of advancing to Europe. The Chinese-Mongol yoke? Nothing has changed, comrades. Therefore, in the medium term I have to note the activation of the Chinese factor in this region /// in the form of "soft" power, it is especially dangerous and ineradicable //// But at the dawn of the next decade, we will see how the military force of China acts. In addition to the powerful fleet // // which is most profitable to sail exactly on the lands of the Far East and Arctic // // China has modernized and is increasing its land grouping ---- in a throw through Cupid or SN-Jian special group of troops. The information gives only a general picture, and information from local sources confirms that these are very combat-ready groups, therefore, the opinion that the PRC has provided itself with a strong rear and wants to To fight in TO ---- is not fully confirmed by the activity of the Chinese army on the banks of the Amur and on the approaches to our Middle Asia.
  4. +4
    7 September 2018 15: 49
    Fake ... Ours and the Americans work closely along the lines of interaction, since only the military can understand and know what death is. And the media inflate everything homogeneously, that they are our OWNERS of Russia.
  5. +4
    7 September 2018 15: 59
    If you would like to strike at the US base, you would have done it, and nothing would have leaked to the media, if only the military would have contacted them and said - tick ... and another routine
    1. LMN
      +5
      7 September 2018 19: 00
      Quote: Alexey-74
      If you would like to strike at the US base, you would have done it, and nothing would have leaked to the media, if only the military would have contacted them and said - tick ... and another routine

      The question is that even the "journalists"don't talk about attack ON AMERICAN BASIS.. laughing It's about the "area" in which the base is located lol

      And here the "pro-Russians" and "pro-Westerners" are ready to kill each other, discussing the "Russian attack on the US base."
      1. +4
        7 September 2018 20: 14
        That's for sure, Maxim! hi Each has its own headquarters in the head. smile
      2. +4
        7 September 2018 20: 19
        Let them practice, you will not fight with your wives. lol
  6. +1
    7 September 2018 16: 06
    Syria pind-wasps did not call to itself. Pind wasps did not ask permission.
    This means that in relation to the pind wasps, one must act not particularly ceremoniously.
    "We hasten to inform you, gentlemen pind-wasps, that it's time for you to get out."
    Something like this.
    1. +1
      7 September 2018 18: 56
      Quote: Waraga
      in relation to pind-wasps it is necessary to act not especially ceremoniously.

      And how do you imagine this?
      Of course, a dwarf can step on the foot of a sumo wrestler .. But then what will happen to the dwarf? I am figuratively, without reference to the strategic nuclear forces.
      Quote: Waraga
      gentlemen of the pind-wasp, it’s time for you to get out.

      And they answered: - "Only after the" democratic elections according to our rules, but under international control! "
      And what do you say to that? Will not do! But many listen to you in the West? How will China react? Iran? Turkey?
      Can we act a little smarter? Leave it to Lavrov and Putin with the + Presidential Security Council ...
      (First - "The Tsar will think about the thought"! (C) And only then - "The Tsar wants to eat!") bully
      1. +1
        7 September 2018 19: 00
        Yes, I do not need. Nehai think. And here I express my opinion. I have the right.
        Otherwise, why was this resource created?
      2. +1
        7 September 2018 19: 03
        ... that's "smarter" and they need to persistently offer to go "into the garden."
  7. +8
    7 September 2018 16: 18
    Will the Russian Air Force hit the US military base in Syria? Of course not
    1. 0
      7 September 2018 16: 57
      you can hit and blockade: "the expectation of death is worse than death itself"
  8. +4
    7 September 2018 16: 37
    No, ours will not strike.
    His blow, it was necessary to apply initially, while being ready for the consequences. It is already too late to drink Borjomi, alas.
  9. +3
    7 September 2018 17: 04
    In my opinion, the blockade is more reasonable. the base is not on the border itself. and near her. Cut it off the border and block it like the Germans of Leningrad. The stripes themselves will ask for peace, and the bearded ones ... And they have a choice, either to the guria or to the family.
    1. +3
      7 September 2018 19: 01
      Quote: sabakina
      In my opinion, the blockade is more reasonable.

      In fact, a "declaration of a blockade" in international military law is an act of declaring war! This is the note of the "progressive public" site.
      Well, who, in their right mind, would do this? No.
  10. LMN
    +6
    7 September 2018 17: 12
    Now in German news, a running line reports from Tehran: GDP rejected a proposal for a temporary ceasefire in Idlib. Yes

    And I think that is right good
    It's time to finish this circus. And so we are already "fiddling" there more than during the Second World War.
  11. -4
    7 September 2018 17: 29
    Of course not. Not a single state, headed by weak and corrupt leaders, will ever encroach on the US if they have entrusted them to "keep" their "back-breaking" hard earned and no less "back-breaking" hidden dollars.

    In relation to the American base, Russia will stand aside, not taking any forceful actions, though slightly waving, so as not to lose face ... And loud calls, like we will call, we ask, this is an empty air shake.
    Russia, with its undeveloped industry, slain health care and a decline in the economy, is not ready to fight an adversary with more than 10 superiority in certain types of weapons, no matter how well-intentioned this is.

    So cool ... who boils and boils ...
    1. LMN
      +5
      7 September 2018 17: 59
      Quote: Apollo
      Of course not. Not a single state, headed by weak and corrupt leaders, will ever encroach on the US if they have entrusted them to "keep" their "back-breaking" hard earned and no less "back-breaking" hidden dollars.

      In relation to the American base, Russia will stand aside, not taking any forceful actions, though slightly waving, so as not to lose face ... And loud calls, like we will call, we ask, this is an empty air shake.
      Russia, with its undeveloped industry, slain health care and a decline in the economy, is not ready to fight an adversary with more than 10 superiority in certain types of weapons, no matter how well-intentioned this is.

      So cool ... who boils and boils ...


      Poured? Now cool ..., no one was going to and did not say about blows to American base. request Blows to the area where the base is located and blows to the base are two different things. Yes

      They were warned that perhaps something nearby would explode. Therefore, you should not worry and write. This is just a sweep of the militants. hi

      Kapets .. so many "rats" got out .. am
    2. 0
      7 September 2018 19: 17
      Quote: Apollo
      Russia, with its undeveloped industry, slain health care and a decline in the economy, is not ready to fight an adversary with more than 10 superiority in certain types of weapons, no matter how well-intentioned this is.

      Well, here's another spiteful benefactor on the site drew!
      Only, if it comes to hot, I advise you not to forget the saying: Mr. Colt, inventing a revolver, made all people equal ...
      And the United States and the Russian Federation made nuclear weapons such, regardless of the economic level and GDP rating!
      Therefore, one should not be so sad about the 10 multiple superiority of the Yankees. They have a place in hell even with this advantage at the pot itself! Or do you believe in fables about Moscow State University and ABM amers, a naive Chukchi boy? laughing
    3. +1
      8 September 2018 08: 33
      There you have it boiled! Even without possessing the facts of storing bucks, he was already so envious. What are you weak, suggestible little people.
    4. +1
      8 September 2018 09: 06
      Quote: Apollo
      I’m not ready to fight an enemy with more than 10 superiority in certain types of weapons
      Firstly, an attack already requires at least threefold overall superiority, even if they were poked up with an 10-fold (apparently, you, as a true demagogue, compared only in the number of aircraft carriers, although they do not fight against each other at all; even so, not the essence of the accuracy of multiplicities) superiority only in certain types of weapons, and we will wait for them. Secondly, these separate types of weapons, offensive, for which there is superiority, must still be dragged in a reasonable time and at the required distance. Thirdly, we also have a similar superiority in certain types of weapons, and, SUDDENLY, in those defensive ones, which are aimed at defending against their 10-times superior types of weapons. I don’t know how you boldly broadcast all this on a military-patriotic website where almost everyone is familiar with the US offensive military doctrine (according to which they develop naval aviation and the Aegis URO) and the Russian defensive military doctrine (in according to which we are developing air defense, electronic warfare, anti-ship missiles, anti-ship missiles, air defense systems and air defense systems). Either you don’t know this (what are you doing here then?), Or you are too brave (expect that no one will dare you to do this), or too stupid (in general, it would be foolish to expect that even I I will not dunk).
  12. -3
    7 September 2018 18: 04
    Quote: LMN

    Kapets .. so many "rats" got out ..:

    kapets not from rats, but from German couch anatyteff fools. Do not find? but in vain ...
    1. LMN
      +5
      7 September 2018 18: 09
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      Kapets .. so many "rats" got out ..:

      kapets not from rats, but from German couch anatyteff fools. Do not find? but in vain ...

      I do not analyze, I state Yes
    2. +1
      7 September 2018 20: 42
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      Kapets .. so many "rats" got out ..:

      kapets not from rats, but from German couch anatyteff fools. Do not find? but in vain ...

      The smartest one, you hang up labels here. No shame or conscience.
  13. -1
    7 September 2018 18: 13
    Quote: LMN

    I do not analyze, I state Yes

    So to health, only it doesn’t change anything.
    1. LMN
      +1
      7 September 2018 18: 29
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      I do not analyze, I state Yes

      So to health, only it doesn’t change anything.

      I do not understand your passage right now .. In my case, my opinion and behavior, something yes, changes Yes
    2. +4
      7 September 2018 19: 21
      Quote: Apollo
      So to health, only it doesn’t change anything.

      And here you are wrong!
      And what about the mood of the public on the site. I'm not talking about "experts", with them everything is clear from the first lines of posts ... Gridasov alone is worth it !!!
      (Not by night will be remembered the glorious name of this fludist!)
  14. msm
    +2
    7 September 2018 18: 17
    Beat? What are you! We substitute the other cheek and make a statement.
  15. 0
    7 September 2018 18: 20
    Quote: msm
    Beat? What are you! We substitute the other cheek and make a statement.

    The experience of past years confirms the correctness of your thoughts ..
    1. +3
      7 September 2018 20: 46
      Who is it that you both trampled into Mother Earth so trampled that they came to such reasoning and such a life.
  16. +2
    7 September 2018 18: 26
    Is this what CNN Trump called fake news? Neither the Russian nor the American military said a word about it, for which SNN began to spread the blizzard.
    We don’t have to attack - the main thing is to give Syria the go-ahead for this, having previously armed them not only with the C300, but also with cruise missiles. And there we’ll warn the geldings that there are Russian military in Syria and God forbid at least one of them will die from American strikes.
  17. -2
    7 September 2018 18: 39
    tells about a warning from Russia to the US military in Syria

    We don’t warn those men ... Israel if you warned and fit a couple of tank divisions with Russian crews to their borders ... All sanctions will be lifted right away and the devils will surrender by 100 and rush to restore Syria with their hands carrying fragments. Think I'm kidding? ..Just need to try ... Russia has nothing to lose and it is not in vain that we have entrenched in Syria! I’m right, Vladimir Vladimirovich ..?
  18. +1
    7 September 2018 18: 41
    But it’s not possible for someone to saturate the earth with a blood! As a rule, these are people who saw the war in the movies and comp.games
  19. -1
    7 September 2018 18: 48
    Quote: LMN

    I do not understand your passage right now .. In my case, my opinion and behavior, something yes, changes

    Your opinion is erroneous or from a poor knowledge of the events of the recent past, which determined the behavior of the Russian Federation in the world for many years. The controversy can take place in different channels, and the Syrian events are only in what I described above.
    Neither the base nor the 25-mile security zone around the base can be attacked by Russian troops, even if the United States accidentally or deliberately hits the Russian group.
    Do you need the Kursk submarine sunk by an American torpedo in Russian territorial waters? But it was Casus Belli, a reason for declaring war. And the president lied. Do not forget about it.
    1. LMN
      +4
      7 September 2018 19: 10
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      I do not understand your passage right now .. In my case, my opinion and behavior, something yes, changes

      Your opinion is erroneous or from a poor knowledge of the events of the recent past, which determined the behavior of the Russian Federation in the world for many years. The controversy can take place in different channels, and the Syrian events are only in what I described above.
      Neither the base nor the 25-mile security zone around the base can be attacked by Russian troops, even if the United States accidentally or deliberately hits the Russian group.
      Do you need the Kursk submarine sunk by an American torpedo in Russian territorial waters? But it was Casus Belli, a reason for declaring war. And the president lied. Do not forget about it.


      Neither the base nor the 25-mile security zone around the base
      cannot be attacked by Russian troops
      , even if the United States accidentally or deliberately hits the Russian group.

      Bullshit. Any base in the world, any factory or shed, any country, can be attacked by Russian troops! Not just attacked, but destroyed (s), or will receive irreparable damage! This is a fact Yes (even the US understands this, unlike you)

      Do you need the Kursk submarine sunk by an American torpedo in Russian territorial waters?

      Can you name the source of information?
      1. +2
        7 September 2018 21: 36
        LMN

        And any base in the world with which weapons of ours can be attacked and destroyed? Nuclear? And if not nuclear, then at what distance?
        1. LMN
          +1
          7 September 2018 22: 41
          Quote: NN52
          LMN

          And any base in the world with which weapons of ours can be attacked and destroyed? Nuclear? And if not nuclear, then at what distance?

          Yes, by anyone! The real range of destruction for example Escander (500 km.) Is probably underestimated (in connection with the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate and Short-Range Missiles). The real range of this product is a mystery. It goes up to 5.000 km!
          This is .. and what prevents our "Topols" and "Bulava" from changing warheads?)
          1. +1
            7 September 2018 22: 47
            LMN
            Iskander has 5 km? However.... lol
            And to replace the poplars and clubs with a vigorous warhead for regular TNT weighing about 1 ton (500 kg caliber), actually ...
            1. LMN
              0
              7 September 2018 23: 10
              Quote: NN52
              LMN
              Iskander has 5 km? However.... lol
              And to replace the poplars and clubs with a vigorous warhead for regular TNT weighing about 1 ton (500 kg caliber), actually ...

              In theory)) lol
            2. LMN
              0
              7 September 2018 23: 14
              Quote: NN52
              LMN
              Iskander has 5 km? However.... lol
              And to replace the poplars and clubs with a vigorous warhead for regular TNT weighing about 1 ton (500 kg caliber), actually ...


              Good. Will daggers work?
              With daggers we can destroy any base, you are our meticulous
              1. 0
                7 September 2018 23: 54
                LMN

                Now the Dagger ... And the pilots on the MiG 31 K to refuel in the air will not get tired, several times, in flight to any amerovsky base?
                Dagger does not fit ...
                What else? Options left?
                1. 0
                  8 September 2018 15: 20
                  Quote: NN52
                  Now the Dagger ... And the pilots on the MiG 31 K to refuel in the air will not get tired, several times, in flight to any amerovsky base?
                  Dagger does not fit ...
                  What else? Options left?


                  What you are unsightly and impassive. The tactical combat cap will destroy all the enemies of Russia with no time to blink. All to ashes, all to dust. Only Russia will remain tselohonka, and on the ruins of tolerant Europe and the nasty US, we will begin to build a new better world. Same as in the current Russian Federation. Everything is also what you see in the windows in the province, but only on the streets of Washington and Amsterdam. Eh dream ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        8 September 2018 08: 32
        Source - OBS news agency.
    2. 0
      7 September 2018 19: 55
      Quote: Apollo
      Kursk, sunk by an American torpedo, is not enough for you

      Less REN TV watch. laughing
      1. +3
        7 September 2018 20: 50
        How Vysotsky sang there: his grueling receiver catches the FRG control ... laughing hence this nonsense with the boat.
  20. +2
    7 September 2018 18: 56
    Quote: flicker
    Is this what CNN Trump called fake news? Neither the Russian nor the American military said a word about it, for which SNN began to spread the blizzard.
    We don’t have to attack - the main thing is to give Syria the go-ahead for this, having previously armed them not only with the C300, but also with cruise missiles. And there we’ll warn the geldings that there are Russian military in Syria and God forbid at least one of them will die from American strikes.

    Even if Russia transfers to Syria all its strategic ammunition of the Kyrgyz Republic and air defense systems, this is not enough to oppose the United States. By the way, the United States would be happy with such a development of events and in Russia they understand this, therefore they will never go on an escalation. And in this case, a stone desert will remain from Syria, which can be stated as a defeat for the Russian Federation.
    1. +2
      7 September 2018 21: 58
      Even if Russia transfers to Syria all its strategic ammunition of the Kyrgyz Republic and air defense systems, this is not enough to oppose the United States.
      But what about Vietnam? The United States has never fought with equals. Apart from bombing Syria, they will not be able to do anything, considering that all of Syria is in ruins, it will not change much - but at least one sunken American ship will be something, all of America will squeal, still in Vietnam's memory.
  21. 0
    7 September 2018 19: 08
    the answer is obvious as God's day ...
  22. -2
    7 September 2018 19: 09
    It is necessary to transfer a couple of powerful MLRS or self-propelled guns to Syria, it is possible with the "Xin and Tsin" and "Li si Tsyn" and hit it in order to turn everything into ashes, and then go away into a confusion well (for example, IS took it away and they all this), I think it will be the best option ...
  23. +1
    7 September 2018 19: 29
    Quote: LMN

    Bullshit. Any base in the world, any factory or barn, any country, can be attacked by Russian troops!

    Even the USSR with its mighty army did not come to mind such nonsense.
    With your judgments, you are either very young and stupid, or you were the first in the line for brainwashing and it had the expected effect on you, or both in one bottle. I served valid and retired before the collapse of the USSR when you were not yet born or were a child. Having behind you a "baggage" of knowledge and events and looking at your worldview, it is impossible to say anything else about you.
    1. LMN
      +4
      7 September 2018 19: 51
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      Bullshit. Any base in the world, any factory or barn, any country, can be attacked by Russian troops!

      Even the USSR with its mighty army did not come to mind such nonsense.
      With your judgments, you are either very young and stupid, or you were the first in the line for brainwashing and it had the expected effect on you, or both in one bottle. I served valid and retired before the collapse of the USSR when you were not yet born or were a child. Having behind you a "baggage" of knowledge and events and looking at your worldview, it is impossible to say anything else about you.

      This is all the lyrics. negative

      I am interested in: Sources that confirm that Kursk was attacked by an American torpedo and justification that the Russian army is not capable of destroying the "development" with a couple of thousand people inside!
      If you answer at least one of these questions, maybe I'll start to respect you a little hi
      A person should be responsible for his words, right ??
      1. +4
        7 September 2018 20: 52
        Well, you, Maxim, have puzzled him, you need to connect convolutions smile
  24. -1
    7 September 2018 19: 45
    Quote: BoA KAA
    And here you are wrong!
    And what about the public mindset on the site.

    You are right, too, and you understand this; you’re only afraid to admit it.
    It is necessary to look objectively at what is happening in Syria, which for some part of the forum is unavailable for a number of reasons. And if the situation in the relations between the USA and the Russian Federation is not in our favor, we must understand this and speak openly, and not take on faith what the media report.
    1. +3
      7 September 2018 21: 22
      The media is usually manipulated, but you get the other way around hi
  25. -3
    7 September 2018 20: 22
    Nuclear strike. And that’s it.
    1. 0
      8 September 2018 08: 36
      And really - that's it.
  26. 0
    7 September 2018 20: 23
    Quote: LMN
    I am interested in: Sources that confirm that Kursk was attacked by an American torpedo and justification that the Russian army is not capable of destroying the "development" with a couple of thousand people inside!
    If you answer at least one of these questions, maybe I'll start to respect you a little hi
    A person should be responsible for his words, right ??

    A young man, I do not need your respect. As for Kursk, there are sources on the network: the external dent and the opening from the torpedo entrance are clearly visible in the frames. As you know, an internal explosion causes bulges, not dents. People with technical education, especially military, understand this more than others. Well, the authorities will never admit it.

    1. LMN
      +3
      7 September 2018 21: 05
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN
      I am interested in: Sources that confirm that Kursk was attacked by an American torpedo and justification that the Russian army is not capable of destroying the "development" with a couple of thousand people inside!
      If you answer at least one of these questions, maybe I'll start to respect you a little hi
      A person should be responsible for his words, right ??

      A young man, I do not need your respect. As for Kursk, there are sources on the network: the external dent and the opening from the torpedo entrance are clearly visible in the frames. As you know, an internal explosion causes bulges, not dents. People with technical education, especially military, understand this more than others. Well, the authorities will never admit it.


      lol
      Did the US torpedo leave such an "ideal" trail?))
      She entered Kursk, and then burst in the other direction ?!
      1. LMN
        +5
        7 September 2018 21: 16
        As for Kursk, there are sources on the network: on the frames, an external dent and a hole from the entrance of the torpedo are clearly visible.


        As for Kursk, the sources in the network:

        Sources on the net say different .. Yes
        Sources on the network claimed that Assad used chemical weapons in Syria (the Russian Federation found these "sources" and directors)
      2. +2
        7 September 2018 21: 26
        Maksim hi , he does not take into account that water and air (atmosphere) are completely striking environments. This "entrance" in the water, and besides at a depth, would have been concave and arched a hundred times.
        1. LMN
          +1
          7 September 2018 21: 43
          Quote: Rusland
          Maksim hi , he does not take into account that water and air (atmosphere) are completely striking environments. This "entrance" in the water, and besides at a depth, would have been concave and arched a hundred times.

          Vitaliy, well, if the flood in Indonesia, the Earth bent over (it’s flat!), If the hole in Kursk, then this is a torpedo .. the hole is round lol
          1. 0
            8 September 2018 08: 42
            Quote: LMN
            then this is a torpedo .. the hole is round
            Not necessary. Here is what internet sources write:
            Quote: Elena Racheva, Novaya Gazeta
            What explosives cannot explain, why, if a rectangular bag measuring 35 by 70 centimeters exploded in the metro, the funnel from it turned out to be a regular round shape with a diameter of 80 centimeters?

            lol
    2. 0
      8 September 2018 00: 39
      You have a torpedo instead of a head.
  27. 0
    7 September 2018 20: 34
    Quote: ultra
    Quote: Apollo
    Kursk, sunk by an American torpedo, is not enough for you

    Less REN TV watch. laughing

    Why Ren TV? Do not be silly. The network is full of frames of a raised boat and a dent with the best evidence of what happened. There is a video.
    There is an article on VO where not sub-politicians, but submarine officers comment on what happened.
    1. 0
      8 September 2018 09: 13
      Quote: Apollo
      ... evidence of what happened. There is a video.
      Is there a torpedo hit video? winked Me for a friend.
  28. 0
    7 September 2018 20: 49
    Quote: BoA KAA

    Well, here's another spiteful benefactor on the site drew!

    When the servants of the regime, they call the electorate to call white black, and black white, it will be like in the USSR.
    1. 0
      8 September 2018 09: 19
      If it were, as in the USSR, you would maximize in the kitchen after the third bottle of vodka the same drinking companion rubbed your game, calling black warm. You better tell me who offended you so much that you, having served this USSR yourself, are now ready to surrender to the United States?
  29. LMN
    +2
    7 September 2018 20: 54
    Quote: ul_vitalii
    That's for sure, Maxim! hi Each has its own headquarters in the head. smile

    Hello Vitaliy! hi
  30. +1
    7 September 2018 20: 54
    No, they won’t hit. The next question.
  31. -1
    7 September 2018 20: 58
    Quote: Not bad
    Who is it that you both trampled into Mother Earth so trampled that they came to such reasoning and such a life.

    Probably trampled on you, but you still do not understand. It doesn’t matter, with maturation understanding will come. You are not the first one.
    1. +2
      7 September 2018 22: 37
      It seems to me that not everything went smoothly in your army, and in civilian too. Character features? hi
    2. 0
      8 September 2018 09: 24
      Wow, well, just a deep old man who has seen the eternal and cognized the universe of the universe. He became so full in his knowledge that it is as if you have already lived on trillions of such planets for one hundred trillion billion years, EVPOCHA.
  32. 0
    7 September 2018 21: 05
    The author deigned to joke, but forgot to put quotation marks. lol
  33. +1
    7 September 2018 21: 23
    Quote: LMN

    Did the US torpedo leave such an "ideal" trail?))
    She entered Kursk, and then burst in the other direction ?!

    There is an article on VO about the tragedy of Kursk. Look for the opinions of submarine officers.
    It's not for nothing that I hinted in a previous comment about technical education. You noticed the edges, but not a dent. Or how, what is not profitable I do not see?
    Judging by the questions, you are a hopeless humanist, and only registration on this site connects you with the army. To dedicate you, humanities, to technical issues is a futile business.
    1. LMN
      +1
      7 September 2018 21: 45
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      Did the US torpedo leave such an "ideal" trail?))
      She entered Kursk, and then burst in the other direction ?!

      There is an article on VO about the tragedy of Kursk. Look for the opinions of submarine officers.
      It's not for nothing that I hinted in a previous comment about technical education. You noticed the edges, but not a dent. Or how, what is not profitable I do not see?
      Judging by the questions, you are a hopeless humanist, and only registration on this site connects you with the army. To dedicate you, humanities, to technical issues is a futile business.

      If not a secret, what connects you with the army?
      1. 0
        8 September 2018 09: 26
        He is connected with the army by the hated USSR.
        Quote: Apollo
        I served the valid and retired until the collapse of the USSR when you were not yet born or were a child.
  34. +2
    7 September 2018 21: 35
    Quote: Rusland
    The media is usually manipulated, but you get the other way around hi

    Of course they are being manipulated. In the last presidential election, all the media were for Putin.
    On Dumskys for EdRo. And when were they against them? All the media look at Rosstat and the Ministry of Economic Development and give their fables to the mountain. The same thing happens on a political and military plane. And you say.

    You have reported.
    1. LMN
      +1
      7 September 2018 21: 55
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: Rusland
      The media is usually manipulated, but you get the other way around hi

      Of course they are being manipulated. In the last presidential election, all the media were for Putin.
      On Dumskys for EdRo. And when were they against them? All the media look at Rosstat and the Ministry of Economic Development and give their fables to the mountain. The same thing happens on a political and military plane. And you say.

      You have reported.


      Of course they are being manipulated. In the last presidential election, all the media were for Putin.

      But the idea that the people working in these media just wanted to see Putin as president of the Russian Federation did not occur?
  35. +1
    7 September 2018 21: 55
    Quote: LMN

    If not a secret, what connects you with the army?

    Nothing now. And so the military school is a valid pension. Open my profile, it is indicated there. Only all this was in the years of the USSR.
    And what connects you?
    1. LMN
      +1
      7 September 2018 22: 53
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      If not a secret, what connects you with the army?

      Nothing now. And so the military school is a valid pension. Open my profile, it is indicated there. Only all this was in the years of the USSR.
      And what connects you?

      And you read my messages, a couple of days earlier I did "give out" that connects me with the army lol
      And don't bother me anymore No.
      Any constructive criticism, I accept and glad Yes
  36. 0
    7 September 2018 22: 09
    Quote: LMN

    But the idea that the people working in these media just wanted to see Putin as president of the Russian Federation did not occur?

    All media can support one candidate, only in a unitary state, or by bribery. Choose what you like best. In a democracy, this is not possible.
    1. +2
      7 September 2018 22: 43
      Man, I won’t discover America, but I’ll say that the Western media are bought up by someone and not for their pretty eyes, I’m talking about Western democracy, which you are trying to present to us as a model. hi
    2. LMN
      +1
      7 September 2018 22: 59
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: LMN

      But the idea that the people working in these media just wanted to see Putin as president of the Russian Federation did not occur?

      All media can support one candidate, only in a unitary state, or by bribery. Choose what you like best. In a democracy, this is not possible.

      Not all media supported GDP! am
    3. -1
      8 September 2018 09: 35
      What are you talking about? We have a bunch of media outlets that under no circumstances support either Putin or United Russia. Being officially registered (there are licenses), they are all “independent”, rubbing in the same game as you, and constantly complain about the lack of freedom of speech. Do you need to provide a list or do you even learn to google in your wise years?
      And why did you get the idea that the form of government (unitary, federation, confederation) somehow correlates with the mood of public opinion?
  37. +1
    7 September 2018 22: 29
    Quote: flicker
    But what about Vietnam? The United States has never fought with equals. Apart from bombing Syria, they will not be able to do anything, considering that all of Syria is in ruins, it will not change much - but at least one sunken American ship will be something, all of America will squeal, still in Vietnam's memory.

    And what about Vietnam, then there was the USSR, which, incidentally, also did not go for a direct clash.
    America is sleeping and sees Russia at least bring down a plane. This is Bell's incident, a reason for declaring war. And in the war, Russia has no chance of conventional weapons. For example, the US Navy has a 10-fold advantage over the Russian Navy. A similar situation in a number of other weapons. From the same Syria, Russia will be squeezed out in just a few days. This must be understood. In Russia, this is understood, therefore, fiery rhetoric is usually followed by clarifications and a dot is set, which will happen this time too.
    1. -1
      7 September 2018 22: 58
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: flicker
      But what about Vietnam? The United States has never fought with equals. Apart from bombing Syria, they will not be able to do anything, considering that all of Syria is in ruins, it will not change much - but at least one sunken American ship will be something, all of America will squeal, still in Vietnam's memory.

      And what about Vietnam, then there was the USSR, which, incidentally, also did not go for a direct clash.
      America is sleeping and sees Russia at least bring down a plane. This is Bell's incident, a reason for declaring war. And in the war, Russia has no chance of conventional weapons. For example, the US Navy has a 10-fold advantage over the Russian Navy. A similar situation in a number of other weapons. From the same Syria, Russia will be squeezed out in just a few days. This must be understood. In Russia, this is understood, therefore, fiery rhetoric is usually followed by clarifications and a dot is set, which will happen this time too.

      Russia has the most nuclear weapons, even more than the United States. And the carriers of nuclear warheads from Russia are modern, with new missile defense systems. Americans have no such innovations yet, so you shouldn’t sit and dream that Americans will come out of this war as winners, in which case they will turn to dust along with their planes, ships and ambitions, but like the whole NATO bloc.
      So do not fantasize, go better, ventilate, smoke outside, breathe air.
      1. 0
        8 September 2018 15: 25
        Quote: gig334
        Russia has the most nuclear weapons, even more than the United States. And the carriers of nuclear warheads from Russia are modern, with new missile defense systems. Americans have no such innovations yet, so you shouldn’t sit and dream that Americans will come out of this war as winners, in which case they will turn to dust along with their planes, ships and ambitions, but like the whole NATO bloc.
        So do not fantasize, go better, ventilate, smoke outside, breathe air.


        So September has come .... What innovations does the USA have, comrade? I understand they are all sticks, but stones are used to fighting but the right is overkill ...
    2. 0
      8 September 2018 09: 39
      Quote: Apollo
      This is Bell's case.
      Whose incident? lol Just some kind of bar you have is unstable. I recommend you shave Occam's razor.
  38. +2
    7 September 2018 22: 43
    Quote: Rusland
    It seems to me that not everything went smoothly in your army, and in civilian too. Character features? hi

    There was no smooth life, of course, but there is no army service without roughness. True, if the pope is a general or colonel, the roughness was erased. Well, the citizen somehow flew softly.
    Okay, time to sleep.
  39. 0
    8 September 2018 11: 27
    Quote: gig334

    And in the war, Russia has no chance of conventional weapons. For example, the US Navy has a 10-fold advantage over the Russian Navy. A similar situation in a number of other weapons.

    Russia has the most nuclear weapons, even more than the United States. And the carriers of nuclear warheads from Russia are modern, with new missile defense systems. Americans have no such innovations yet, so you shouldn’t sit and dream that Americans will come out of this war as winners, in which case they will turn to dust along with their planes, ships and ambitions, but like the whole NATO bloc.
    So do not fantasize, go better, ventilate, smoke outside, breathe air.

    Young man, you are stupid, instead of brains in your head is slop. Before you go to this site and comment, take care to find out what conventional weapons are. And then you are in the elderberry garden in Kiev, uncle.
  40. 0
    8 September 2018 11: 31
    Quote: Bass Navigator
    What are you talking about? We have a bunch of media outlets that under no circumstances support either Putin or United Russia. Being officially registered (there are licenses), they are all “independent”, rubbing in the same game as you, and constantly complain about the lack of freedom of speech. Do you need to provide a list or do you even learn to google in your wise years?
    And why did you get the idea that the form of government (unitary, federation, confederation) somehow correlates with the mood of public opinion?

    You will poke the wife. And tell her fables to her.
  41. 0
    8 September 2018 11: 35
    Quote: LMN
    Quote: Apollo
    Quote: LMN

    But the idea that the people working in these media just wanted to see Putin as president of the Russian Federation did not occur?

    All media can support one candidate, only in a unitary state, or by bribery. Choose what you like best. In a democracy, this is not possible.

    Not all media supported GDP! am

    No, you are disingenuous again. 99% of the media admitted to television on federal TV channels praised Putin. The opposition had no more than 1% of the airtime, which no one even noticed.
  42. 0
    8 September 2018 11: 40
    Quote: Bass Navigator
    Quote: Apollo
    This is Bell's case.
    Whose incident? :

    This is not your level. Do better cleaning sheds, there are more understandable incidents for you.
  43. 0
    8 September 2018 11: 47
    Quote: Rusland
    Man, I won’t discover America, but I’ll say that the Western media are bought up by someone and not for their pretty eyes, I’m talking about Western democracy, which you are trying to present to us as a model. hi

    And where did I present Western democracy as a model? Link to the studio! Then your friend wrote that you should answer for your words. I hope this applies to you.

    And if you think that the main (leading) Russian media, including TV, are not biased by the Kremlin, I’m sorry for you. It’s probably a secret for you that they played and still play the first violin in all federal elected companies.
  44. -1
    8 September 2018 12: 30
    Quote: LMN

    And you read my messages, a couple of days earlier I did "give out" that connects me with the army lol
    And don't bother me anymore No.
    Any constructive criticism, I accept and glad Yes

    I am a citizen of the Russian Federation. Militarized. Twice a participant in the database.
    I did not hide and do not hide the fact that I live in Germany. And not because of "sausage" I am here. This is a kind of compensation for my childhood. 80s, YAMAL.

    You are young and ambitious, I was not mistaken. That is why your views border on recklessness, like the overwhelming majority of the current 20-40 year olds. You are sitting out in Germany, apparently on public funds and you have found something to do, but here with a shaking hand (a lot of spelling errors) you describe your "life".
    In exchange for a sweet and carefree life, you stand up for Putin and Co., despite all the vices of society and the failures in the economy that arose during his presidency and brought the population to poverty. People like you, a priori, do not and cannot have their own objective opinions about the processes taking place in politics, economics and public life in Russia. You will always serve and lick power. Such people are not in honor of the people.
    I have the honor and do not want to communicate with you in the future!
  45. 0
    11 September 2018 22: 21
    Quote: Bass Navigator
    Quote: Apollo
    ... evidence of what happened. There is a video.
    Is there a torpedo hit video? winked Me for a friend.

    Basov, why not attract prostitutes to request HD video or homosexuals? Let’s think there. At VO would appreciate your impulse is very worthy.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"