CNN: Russia is ready to strike at the territory with the American base of Al-Tanf

The American television channel CNN, named by the President of the United States as a “fake television channel,” released a material in which it claims that Russia allegedly twice in the last week notified the United States of its readiness to strike on that part of the Syrian territory where there are “dozens of US military” Tass

At the same time, the channel refers to its own sources in the Pentagon, which claim that the greatest concern of Washington is the security of American troops at the base of Et-Tanf in the province of Homs. This is due to the statement of Moscow that "militants of terrorist groups are under the protection of the US military in this territory." At the same time, the Pentagon fears that the Russian side may apply Aviation or their warships "for launching a missile strike against those whom Moscow calls militants."

CNN claims that on this occasion, Washington allegedly "warned Moscow about the danger of challenging the US military presence," as this could lead to confrontation in the event of an unintended defeat of the US military "during an inaccurate Russian missile strike." In connection with this, the channel reports, the US military "recommends Moscow to stay away from Al-Tanfa", since "the United States is ready for retaliatory actions."

Comments

[aszzz888]

American CNN, named "fake TV channel" by the US president

... garbage, she is garbage ...

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Shaking your biceps is all that the United States has left before leaving Syria. They will scream, scare ... Knowing full well that in reality the Russian response will be too painful. And of course they won’t do it. Why do they need it all. It will not even be Vietnam. If you put Syria on the scales and the consequences of the clash between the United States and Russia, after all this, no one will have any more interests in Syria.

[Thrall]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

It will not even be Vietnam.

There was no Soviet contingent in Vietnam (officially). In Syria there is.

[For example]

Quote: Thrall

There was no Soviet contingent in Vietnam (officially). In Syria there is.

Yah? Straight with red stars on the cockatoo? And on the shoulder straps of the SA?
How much has arrived from the BSSR?

[Adimius38]

the question is whether Russia will do this. Or do you seriously think that Russia will begin to iron the barmalei in the circle of American military personnel, that I doubt such an outcome. Russia is very weak in this theater of operations, and this is perfectly understood in the Kremlin. Therefore, even a local war with the forces of a serious enemy will not be unleashed. We do not have a serious surface fleet, there are no powerful air defense ships capable of containing massive missile attacks, and we do have a submarine fleet and in part it can fulfill some tasks, but no more. On land, if you face your foreheads with the United States and their allies in the Middle East region, then the advantage is not in our favor. Yes, elementary ordinary logistics are lame even in peacetime. Therefore, if you put aside the window dress and patriotic bravado, before taking a step in the direction of a military clash from the United States, you need to think ten times whether we will pull this clash in this even limited region.

[Loess]

Quote: Adimius38

Or do you seriously think that Russia will begin to iron the barmalei in the circle of American troops,

Will start - it will not start, of course, is another question. But the Americans should play on the nerves. It is possible that they themselves will get out of there. To avoid, so to speak. They will declare their complete and unconditional victory and will be removed. Of course, everything will not be as simple as I wrote, but without demonstrating serious intentions, the Yankees will never leave of their own free will.

[bulvas]

Quote: Adimius38

Russia is very weak in this theater of operations, and this is perfectly understood in the Kremlin. Therefore, even a local war with the forces of a serious enemy will not be unleashed. We do not have a serious surface fleet, there are no powerful air defense ships

In my unprofessional opinion, we have one advantage in the region over the USA:

we are able to strike from our territory, both from the waters of the Caspian Sea and from the air

In this case, they will have to strike back at the territory of Russia, and this is completely different

[Barzha]

we are able to strike from our territory, both from the waters of the Caspian Sea and from the air

Well, they too can strike from the Persian Gulf. And airstrikes from aircraft carriers.

In this case, they will have to strike back at the territory of Russia

Each ship - American, Russian, French, Japanese, etc. - is the territory of the country under whose flag it flies. And a blow to him is regarded as a blow to the territory of a given state.
Russia now really has nothing to oppose the United States and NATO in the payment of the Navy. But there is an essential point - the United States always evaluates military operations in terms of "acceptable losses." They do not "fight to the death" and do not "fight to the last bullet." So, any collision with the Russian Navy ends with the complete destruction of the latter, but it definitely leads to absolutely unacceptable losses. Therefore, even having a significant superiority, they do not get involved with us in direct conflicts.

[bulvas]

Quote: Barzha

Each ship - American, Russian, French, Japanese, etc. - is the territory of the country under whose flag it flies. And a blow to him is regarded as a blow to the territory of a given state.

This is not news, but you must admit, one when they strike a ship in the Persian Gulf and
completely different when they strike at a base in Norfolk or San Diego

It is one thing to exchange strikes on ships and remote bases, and quite another on cities and territories of the country.

No matter how much they pull their ships into the bays, we have more opportunities on their land and they understand this

Now such a situation is that no one can concede but they are afraid to cross the line, therefore even the norms of the Cold War can already be revised


It is probably stupid to talk about such things, but we are already somewhere close to such a reality ...

[Adimius38]

why should they strike in Russia? they can strike at Russian forces and means precisely in the Mediterranean region. In particular, according to our bases, forces in the air and on water. This is if the conflict persists within the local limited in the region. And I am afraid that having excellent logistics, the military bases in the vicinity were covered by a NATO bloc, ALLIES in the Middle East region equipped with advanced weapons systems, and not without our help, including, we won’t last long there. Therefore, a local conflict will not be in our favor. Therefore, we need to give clear signals that the local conflict in our case will not work, that we will slaughter everyone and everything far beyond the borders of the Mediterranean region.

[bulvas]

Quote: Adimius38

why should they strike in Russia? they can strike at Russian forces and means precisely in the Mediterranean region.

They are on our bases and ships, we are on their
We can strike at their bases from the Caspian Sea and from the air over Russia, then they will have no advantage.

And what should they do in this case?
Will either leave or strike at Russia.

And which US allies will go for it?
And are they themselves ready for such a development of events?

They will have to stop, and they already have losses, the whole world will conclude that the United States lost to Russia and deflated and that nobody needs their bases, like their weapons, there is a political crisis inside the United States.

It turns out this logic, which means they should not be allowed to clash with Russia.

That’s why a new round with skripals and everything else, because they have no real opportunity to stop Russia in Syria.

Lose in Syria - then it will be very difficult for them to make oneself exceptional and command the world

[Sanichsan]

Quote: bulvas

Lose in Syria - then it will be very difficult for them to make oneself exceptional and command the world

Duc already all that keeps the EU under US control is the financial system. if you remember, the EU has already started fussing about its own electronic payment mechanisms. that is, the moment of realizing that "hoyain nioche" has already passed and attempts to get out of the collar began.

[NordUral]

You should not bury the States, no matter how it hiccups the whole world thoroughly. And to us first of all. And the option that Trump will work for two terms, it is possible that America will become very strong again. But "ours" in the Kremlin and around are driving Russia into the abyss.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: Adimius38

they can strike at Russian forces and means precisely in the Mediterranean region.

there is one delicate moment. the last time out of 107 missiles fired, the target was only struck by those that attacked unguarded air defense systems. so with the level of security of Russian and Syrian facilities, everything is less or less clear, but with the level of security of American facilities, everything is not very clear. Considering how the United States is fidgeting, it seems that things are bad and they cannot guarantee the protection of their facilities.
most likely the United States will go to reputational losses and dumped from Syria. a different scenario is much worse even if it is NOT nuclear.

[Marconi41]

Quote: Less

It is possible that they themselves will get out of there. To avoid, so to speak.

Do you really hold the United States for fools. They also know how to count. Our small VKS base and the very small Tarutus are not big threats to the Western coalition. They are simply razed to the ground. And Putin, too, is not to rush into such an adventure. Most likely, the barmaleis will be pushing the US base to the forces of the Syrian army. We ourselves will not get involved in this swara.

[Lelek]

Quote: Marconi41

Most likely, the barmaleis will be pushing the US base to the forces of the Syrian army. We ourselves will not get involved in this swara.

Somewhere like that, but with the use of our videoconferencing, while warning about the strikes of our sworn "partners".

[Marconi41]

This news is from SNN. Faknews, as their president says. They will lie, they will not take expensively.

[Lelek]

Quote: Marconi41

This news is from SNN. Faknews, as their president says. They will lie, they will not take expensively.

Well, as long as we have what we have. The Defense Ministry at the briefing confirmed the fact of warnings and S.V. Lavrov announced this.

[raw174]

Quote: Adimius38

the question is whether Russia will do this.

Russia will not go because of what you described, but the United States will not hit the Russian Armed Forces, as in the event of a collision, even with their victory in a regional conflict, they will suffer unacceptable damage. Nevertheless, our group in the SAR is not toothless kittens, and it hangs noisily in the tinsel ... As a result, ours will be beaten by the barmalei, and the USA by Assad’s troops.

[Marconi41]

Quote: raw174

Nevertheless, our group in the SAR is not toothless kittens and hangs on the wort is notable ...

Oh well. Maybe we will count? NATO base in Cyprus, Saudi Arabia, Turkey ... continue? And will we organize the transportation of ammunition underground? About the number of our missiles against the Americans, also a separate conversation.
Of course, there will be no welding between Russia and the USA. Both sides are friends and will not go to an open conflict.

[raw174]

Quote: Marconi41

Oh well. Maybe we will count?

I said that we cannot compete with the United States and NATO in this region, but this is an armed enough large group that strategic aviation can support, and the losses of the attackers will not be small, so no one will dare to strike.

[KaPToC]

Quote: raw174

Russia will not go because you described

The American base in Syria is illegal and if it is ironed, the Americans will wipe out.

[Livonetc]

Why in the circle?
Just around the circle.
In those areas and observing those distances at which the location of the American units will not be physically affected.
And no urry of bravado.
US units should not be touched.
Our divisions, in their own way, did not touch the "partners" during the advance and occupation of the Slatina airport, although probably some of them had such a desire.
We ourselves then left.
And in this situation, it is necessary to create extremely uncomfortable conditions for them.
And let them sit for the time being.
Remember the children's game of knives?
Piece by piece, piece by piece, until the opponent can no longer stand on his piece.

[lucul]

Quote: Adimius38

Russia is very weak in this theater of operations, and this is perfectly understood in the Kremlin. Therefore, even a local war with the forces of a serious enemy will not be unleashed. We do not have a serious surface fleet, there are no powerful air defense ships capable of containing massive missile attacks, and we do have a submarine fleet and in part it can fulfill some tasks, but no more. On land, if you face your foreheads with the United States and their allies in the Middle East region, then the advantage is not in our favor.

Laughing for a long time.
The entire US military doctrine (non-nuclear version) of the past 30 years, was built precisely around Tomogavk cruise missiles.
And as practice has shown, the effectiveness of Tomogavkov was greatly exaggerated.
It was released 59 !!!! Tomogavkov on the airfield and the airfield continued to function.
With such efficiency, the amers will not have enough of all cruise missiles, from all the carriers located in that area, at the Khmeimim base.
Regarding the ground forces - if we take our motorized rifle division and the American one, then the amers have no chance. And these are the words of American analysts.
But with you, as usual - "our Tsakhal is the strongest"))

[aszzz888]

Aristarkh Ludwigovich (Aristarkh Ludwigovich) Today, 10: 22

... they take to Arap ... a rake for mericatos - Law ...

[Kent0001]

Ponte while we are bashing, the Americans are achieving their goals little by little. He and Rakku and other cities were bombed and it’s violent for everything, since this is the right of the strong ... and we all justify ourselves for Skripal, and even with Britain we didn’t lower the level of deep relations with frank lies, and the Americans will roll this us out in October and we will patronize ... and each will draw his own conclusions. Something like this. Waiting for cons from cheers-patriots.

[aquatic]

Well, sometimes Ponte is a useful thing) but seriously, the issue with Idlib is being resolved now and the issue will be resolved in the near future))
in our warnings there was not a word about At-Tanf) they bombed a completely different place where there are many American (and not only American) military personnel.

and the Americans, how do you say there?))) "ameriken" leaked)))) and made a joke by turning the conversation to At-Tanf))) but he is not bombed))

[XiaoTou]

If this is the case, then the MoE has honestly warned, twice. Well, then "who did not hide, I am not to blame"

[udincev]

If so. This is CNN.

[ANCIENT]

It was necessary to act strictly on the American side — to strike, and then say, well, nothing bad happened, we didn’t hit with nuclear weapons, so live who survived until the next strike, and rejoice!

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Quote: ANCIENT

It was necessary to act purely on American - to strike, and then say, well, nothing bad happened

You need to rip you off the couch and offer to dig a full profile trench, as required by the Charter, and of course meet the norm. Maybe this will help you, especially if you can select a gadget to access the Internet.

[keeper03]

Aristarchus, and not because we are afraid to fart in the direction of the Americans, that at one time pit trenches to the bone were piled up ?! It’s necessary in the ATS somehow more decisively!

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Quote: keeper03

It’s necessary in the ATS somehow more decisively!

Alexander Water sharpens a stone. The US is already forced to play by the rules that Russia sets in Syria. The USA almost lost the war, ISIS bombed, Assad in power, the Russians in Tartus and Khmeimim ... As for Idlib, most likely our Syrians have not yet agreed on what sheds can be allowed to shoot the United States.

[Lelek]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

The USA almost lost the war, ISIS bombed, Assad in power, the Russians in Tartus and Khmeimim ... As for Idlib, most likely our Syrians have not yet agreed on what sheds can be allowed to shoot the United States.

This is so, especially since in "Europe" (read - NATO countries) they are beginning to understand and recognize the correctness of the actions of the Russian Federation on the territory of Syria.

[ANCIENT]

Aristarkh Ludwigovich from the sofa and Rostov on the Don for a hundred kilometers! So do not write empty !!!

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Quote: ANCIENT

So do not write empty !!!

And there is nothing to offer to bomb the US military base at Tanf in the province of Homs.

[KaPToC]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

You need to rip you off the couch and offer to dig a full profile trench, as required by the Charter, and of course meet the norm.

Why this profanity? Let's gather all the military and send them to grow bread, sew clothes, build houses. Everyone is doing his own thing, and everyone who has done military service in the army was digging trenches.

[bald]

Seryoz - and then there is no need to say anything - here I am a senior citizen but I will wet these American bitches, although it’s difficult after the first shot

[Alexey-74]

Ours of course will not allow a blow to the Americans (although it should ...), but the Yankees clearly understand that they will have to leave, because the forces of the Syrian army can also clean them ....

[bessmertniy]

It would be better if the Americans themselves destroyed their terrorist fosterlings at Al-Tanf, but would have cleaned themselves. Nobody called them there.

[YarSer88]

He called, didn’t call - it’s not important anymore, dug in, now you won’t bring out dichlorvos, worse than cockroaches.

[rotmistr60]

With the channel it is clear, we can agree with the Trump characteristic given to him.

"recommend that Moscow stay away from Al-Tanf", as "the United States is ready to retaliate"

This is probably a response to Moscow through the media to its warnings to the Americans about the possible consequences of a strike on Syrian territory? American journalists are competing for who has the coolest "sources", hence all this daily trash heap.

[EXPrompt]

What is there to warn, drop by mistake 500kg next to you, if you apologize, say aliager com aliager, and then if it doesn’t come to drop 500tku already at headquarters. That's the whole conversation with the hegemon.
They are getting smarter, getting blindfolds in the form of the usa.

[Sakhalin.]

By the way, the US military is in Syria illegally, which means Russia has every right to ask them from there. But CNN is a garbage dump and there is no faith in them, like other overseas media!

[Nitarius]

who gave them the right to be in a foreign land?

[Vlad5307]

Quote: Sakhalin.

By the way, the US military is in Syria illegally, which means Russia has every right to ask them from there. But CNN is a garbage dump and there is no faith in them, like other overseas media!

After all, Mono can also be taken out by the forces of the SAR AF after Syria resolutely asks to leave the territory of the Armed Forces of the countries that arrived there without their request, after having expended all their radars. Everything has its time.

[Berkut24]

Russia is ready to strike at the territory with an American base

The only language that Americans understand.

[Muxalet]

The Russian leadership either does not understand what it can come to with such strange threats, or vice versa - deliberately leads the case to forced isolation. It's hard to say what's in their heads. The question: is the fight against mythical international terrorism worth such consequences - no one asks. Putin began an adventure in Syria under the slogan of "fighting on the distant approaches" against the scumbag renegades. Three years later, the option of a direct clash with the leading countries of the world is already being seriously discussed. What is the profit for the country of such exercises of insane leadership - it is impossible to reasonably explain.

[aquatic]

to someone who does not want to see the obvious rationally explain is unlikely to succeed)

your "mythical" international terrorism led by the coalition tore apart Serbia, Iraq, Libya according to the same scenario, almost tore apart Syria, Turkey would be further according to the plan, Ararat would be returned to the Armenians and then Iran from their territory, after Iran it would be our turn .. ....... noooo

"a gamble on distant approaches" broke the whole beautiful plan)))) and that's great

The "Jerusalem Post" did not describe in detail what Israel was giving to the terrorists)) iiiiiii not only about fuel and rations)) but also quite a huge amount of weapons) which, according to our stellar, Israel never transmitted to the militants)))) for some reason, they deleted the article a few days later) they don’t take themselves to their loved ones not comme il faut))

[KaPToC]

Quote: Muxalet

Three years later, the option of a direct clash with the leading countries of the world is already being seriously discussed.

They attack us and not we attack them. Your speech is not at the address. Go resent the English Internet segment - there they will accept you as their own.

[Guru]

Pure Water Browada CNN,

"with an inaccurate missile strike by the Russians"

This is when we had inaccurate strikes? As they said in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, we get into the handle of a spade.

[The Sparkle]

Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich

Quote: ANCIENT

It was necessary to act purely on American - to strike, and then say, well, nothing bad happened

You need to rip you off the couch and offer to dig a full profile trench, as required by the Charter, and of course meet the norm.

I need to get off the couch.)))
I did not serve, and I do not know - what is the standard for a trench. Can you tell me - the time and size of a single cell? I'm going to dig a cellar - I'll look at my capabilities.))

[ggl1]

Get the Americans in the face
Russia is not the same and will not tolerate your rudeness and duplicity!

[I am Russian]

I’m in no doubt that I’m ready to retaliate with it. they will not chew snot and send notes of protest.

[vladcub]

CNN is right: militants feel comfortable under US protection.
Actually, Trump was right when he said: "fake TV channel"

[maks007]

Quote: Marconi41

Oh well. Maybe we will count? NATO base in Cyprus, Saudi Arabia, Turkey ... continue? And will we organize the transportation of ammunition underground? About the number of our missiles against the Americans, also a separate conversation.

You can count as many as you like, the only question is what kind of victims (of course I wouldn’t want to) are the United States prepared for using what you listed.

[flicker]

CNN claims that on this occasion, Washington allegedly "warned Moscow about the danger of challenging the US military presence," as this could lead to confrontation in the event of an unintended defeat of the US military "during an inaccurate Russian missile strike." In connection with this, the channel reports, the US military "recommends Moscow to stay away from Al-Tanfa", since "the United States is ready for retaliatory actions."

Laughter and only - SNN came up with the horror story itself and it itself menacingly answered First, we launch the duck that Russia warned the geldings, and then we shout sharply at Russia and it does not strike. It turns out that Russia was afraid of the mattress SNN has worked on the information front, "bent" Russia, now Russians will say that Russia has drifted.
Once again, we need to attack Et Tanfu, there are Syrians for this, but we only need to arm them (by the way, Iran too), and then we will see how the mattresses strike Syria, where Russian military instructors are located. To defeat Syria, in the territory of which Russia is officially located, the mattress will not be able to, only everyone will be offended.
So SNN is fake news.

[Shahno]

So the fake is understandable. We find out the goals and the defendants.

[Varaga]

"... on this territory, under the protection of the American military, there are fighters of terrorist groups ..."
Knowing the pindos, I have no doubt about it. "Don't go to the fortuneteller ..."

[tTshka]

according to those whom Moscow calls militants (c) They are such and I are ... it's just Washington and its lackeys call them rebels, moderate, etc. dogs stooped

[ludrosia]

You just need to destroy this American occupational aggression base in Syria.
If I were the president of Russia Russian Orthodox Christian, I would have done so.
Vote for me! And the United States would be silent in a little rag. Because if it began to fight after the destruction of the US base in Syria against Russian Orthodox Christian Russia, against Russian Orthodox Christians, the Russian Orthodox Christian people, this United States would become part of the Russian Orthodox Christian Russia !