Military Review

Coming rebellion of colonial democracy. Poroshenko-our president!

21
The Bandera Deputy Minister for the "occupied territories" Georgy Tuka, in connection with the upcoming presidential elections in Ukraine, speaks of a possible uprising of the regions: the non-recognition by some regions of Ukraine of the elected President of Ukraine if they are not Poroshenko.




And what kind of regions of Ukraine can, in principle, rebel? The southeastern regions of the country are occupied by the Bandera Nazi battalions, they control the western and central regions, the APU is stationed in the Donbas, the SBU submits to Poroshenko and became his “death squadron”, reached the head of the DPR, Alexander Zakharchenko.

Only the western regions can rise, these same Nazi battalions can rise if not Poroshenko is elected. Tuka is actually blackmailing other claimants for power, first of all Yulia Tymoshenko. Lady “Yu” has already announced her entry into the presidential race, and alone with “Batkivschyna”, and allegedly enlisted the support of John Bolton, Assistant to the President of the United States for National Security.

Poroshenko political consultants blab on the sidelines that they will lead the election campaign according to the following scenario: Poroshenko is opposed to Putin in reality, all opposition candidates will surrender the country to Putin. Then the western regions may not recognize the victory of Tymoshenko and any other presidential candidate, and a scenario of the split of Ukraine, about which many are talking, opens, and Tuk has specified it.

All this can be a play for Putin. In fact, the Bandera dictatorship consolidated, Poroshenko agreed to become the Fuehrer of the neo-Nazis, sings completely with the voice of their ideologues. They accepted him, though without great love, because he had already become the face of their power and was adopted in the West, and they might not accept the other Fuhrer. “They do not change horses at the crossing!” - everyone knows this truth.

What elections can be in a colony country under the supervision of paramilitaries and death squads? Only staged. Moreover, this performance is needed for both the Kiev top and Washington. John Bolton, as it were, supported Tymoshenko, the American embassy in Kiev, as it were, supported the candidacies of Gritsenko and Vakarchuk, creating a pre-election intrigue. But the State Department from Washington is in charge of the whole process, and the necessary compromises will be found for Poroshenko to win, apparently. Otherwise, neo-Nazis threaten the western regions of the country with rebellion through the Tuku, they are capable of it, and the State Department will have to take this into account.

Indirectly, all this is confirmed by the Bandera propagandists like Vadim Karasev, when they say that there will not be a big offensive in the Donbas or the imposition of martial law in the country, and the elections in Ukraine will be held "as in a normal country": they know better the internal situation that everything is trapped and under the control of neo-Nazis, so why extra trouble?

However, in games with the devil and with the State Department one can never rely on obvious things. If Washington adheres to a long-term strategy in Ukraine, that is, the continuation of the scenario of positional confrontation with Russia, then they do not need destabilization, and they will extend Poroshenko’s powers.

If the US chooses a short-term strategy in Ukraine, if they need to blow up the situation in Ukraine, for example, as Alexander Zakharchenko was blown up, then they will get rid of Poroshenko, creating trouble for Russia in Ukraine in another way. For example, the Ukrainian “gas pipe” could be blown up on the sly.

Donetsk and Lugansk rely on Russia, so the political consequences of the assassination of the head of the republic, Alexander Zakharchenko, will be curtailed, and who can Poroshenko and his regime rely on if Washington is at least distancing itself?

With the arrival of Donald Trump in Washington, the gosdepovskoye colonial-democratic government of the world and Ukraine is disoriented, with the result that the colonies receive conflicting signals from Washington, and such opportunities are open for them to play on the contradictions between their masters, that even Tuka is not shy about setting conditions for the American curators of Kiev .

Now one question is unclear: is the Bandera regime in its current form beneficial to Washington, in whose White House Donald Trump sits? Until the November congressional elections, no one will touch this question, neither Donald Trump nor the McCain war party supporting Kiev neo-Nazis before.

Russia has another question: what to do with this Bandera performance of the United States after the assassination of the head of the DPR? Without any investigation, it is clear that the murder of Zakharchenko is beneficial to those who are openly happy about it. Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov made an important statement: “The consequences are inevitable,” but what will be the consequences? They should be well thought out, since the game goes not so much with Bandera in Ukraine, as with Washington in Ukraine.

This suggests, following the example of Western colleagues, the announcement of economic sanctions against Kiev for non-compliance with the Minsk agreements. Then, the accusation of the Kiev regime in the murder of the head of the DPR with the denial of legitimacy and the recognition of the Donbass republics after the end of the investigative actions, when the organizers of the terrorist attack are established. Circumstances allow you to apply these measures consistently, tracking the reaction of Washington.
Author:
Photos used:
ReAl, commons.wikimedia.org
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 September 2018 14: 04
    -2
    Spokeswoman Dmitry Peskov made an important statement: “Consequences are inevitable"But what will be the consequences?

    ... there isn’t much mind to suggest such an outcome ...
    1. Victor Kamenev
      5 September 2018 18: 14
      -1
      Probably, immediately put their cards on the table - a sign of a great mind ...
    2. Forester
      Forester 6 September 2018 11: 12
      +1
      Well, what? Again we threaten with a finger!
  2. Waldemar
    Waldemar 5 September 2018 14: 57
    +5
    I am still tormented by one question, why are all these leaders of the Ukrainian national idea so similar to immigrants from Jewish families?
    You know, this is very embarrassing
    1. Conductor
      Conductor 5 September 2018 15: 19
      -3
      for Babi Yar was a PR action of the Semites!
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 5 September 2018 20: 40
        +4
        Are you sick or really flawed?
      2. Vladimir 5
        Vladimir 5 12 September 2018 12: 02
        -2
        You are wrong, Babi Yar and the entire Holocaust became a foreseen consequence of Hitler’s rise to power with the money of US financiers, the vast majority of whom are from the same nation. Conclusion: The Holocaust is a collective crime in which indirect accomplices and American ...
  3. parusnik
    parusnik 5 September 2018 14: 57
    +4
    If the US chooses a short-term strategy in Ukraine, if they need to blow up the situation in Ukraine, for example, as Alexander Zakharchenko was blown up, then they will get rid of Poroshenko, creating trouble for Russia in Ukraine in another way. For example, the Ukrainian “gas pipe” could be blown up on the sly.
    .... And why does the USA need a short-term strategy ... Poroshenko is better in her hands than, for example, Tymoshenko in the w -... uh ... heaven with a scythe, a lady quite on her mind .. Explode a gas pipeline in Ukraine, even in direct, although, figuratively, the United States will not bring dividends on the gas issue either politically or economically .. On the contrary, it will strengthen Russia's position in the sense that Ukraine is not a reliable tracer ... Europe has repeatedly stated that gas should be delivered to Western countries and through Ukraine, and not just bypassing .. And the measures indicated in the last paragraph are clearly asking for it ... step by step .. tracking the reaction of Fashington .. Tuk's statement, bluffing, and good, is aimed at the faint of heart..There whose ear twitches , that card and discards ..
    1. Victor Kamenev
      5 September 2018 18: 20
      0
      And you can not guess who will be responsible for the explosion of the pipeline? The same is clear - Russia will blow up. The US needs to cut off Russia's energy supplies to Europe altogether; however, not everyone can realize this complex thought without a corresponding statement from the State Department.
  4. iouris
    iouris 5 September 2018 15: 26
    0
    It seems that the problem is that these "sanctions" put pressure on very specific levers for making responsible decisions, so the initiative is simply given to the "partners". But "to bomb Uryupinsk", it seems, no one forbids. Is this line called "strategic patience"?
  5. BAI
    BAI 5 September 2018 16: 48
    +2
    For example, the Ukrainian “gas pipe” may also be blown up to the noise.

    This would be the best gift for Russia, because show the world that Ukraine is an unreliable transit country.
    1. Victor Kamenev
      5 September 2018 18: 23
      +2
      It will not show anything, for Russia will blow up, this is as clear as day, and the State Department will bring incontestable evidence.
      1. Forester
        Forester 6 September 2018 11: 14
        +1
        They will not even have to bring them! They say that all!
  6. Vladimir Kanygin
    Vladimir Kanygin 5 September 2018 16: 58
    0
    Extremely revealing. Russia acts only after Washington’s reaction, so as not to annoy him?
    1. Victor Kamenev
      5 September 2018 18: 25
      -1
      You forgot about the Crimea and Syria, and South Ossetia, strange ...
  7. Antares
    Antares 5 September 2018 23: 07
    +2
    Without any investigation, it is clear that the murder of Zakharchenko is beneficial to someone who openly rejoices at this

    Why carry out the investigation in general? Plant everyone who rejoices. Precisely guilty.
    Kamenev’s analytics is serious, if conclusions can be drawn even from bricks and emotions. laughing
    Spokeswoman Dmitry Peskov made an important statement: “Consequences are inevitable,” but what will be the consequences?

    And the best choice of the Russian people said that his subordinate carries a blizzard ... So who to believe - the boss or subordinate?
    economic sanctions against Kiev for failure to comply with the Minsk agreements

    already exists in the framework of the Trade War, Minsk didn’t spend the night there ...
    What else if the turnover has shrunk? Even the "growth of fuel supplies from Russia with fertilizers" to 6 billion will not restore the turnover of 2013
    Then the Kiev regime’s charge of killing the head of the DPR

    well, if without investigation, proceeding that they were "more happy" is possible even tomorrow (although Zakharova has already stated and the Russian media are also pedaling this version of reality)
    for Ukraine he is a puppet, it makes no sense to waste resources on him. Neither on him nor on Surkov .. Without Ukraine, everyone, even obedient puppets, will be perfectly disposed of there. and there and even in Moscow.
    denial of legitimacy

    what's the point? The recognition of all but the Russian Federation does not change anything, the Russian Federation is not the United States and not even the EU.
    recognition of the Donbass republics after the end of investigative actions, when the organizers of the terrorist attack will be established

    so it’s clear and without investigation that they work at Bankova laughing
    in each topic, the recognition of ORDILO ... but Minsk has no alternative, and there it is Ukraine ...
  8. Zhurba
    Zhurba 6 September 2018 12: 47
    -1
    Brad.
    what rebellion?
    The author confused the shoto.
  9. Normal ok
    Normal ok 7 September 2018 09: 45
    0
    That Kamenev, that Dzherelivsky - they are terribly far from reality. They live in a fantasy world of their fantasies. After all, nothing of the fact that they vanged here the last 4 of the year came true. Who are we listening to? What is there to discuss?
  10. Berkut24
    Berkut24 7 September 2018 13: 30
    0
    After Ukraine, popcorn no longer climbs into me.
  11. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 7 September 2018 13: 40
    +1
    Quote: Antares
    And the best choice of the Russian people said that his subordinate carries a blizzard ... So who to believe - the boss or subordinate?

    Parishioners believe in the church, but we are not in the church! They deceive those who believe in the word. And finally - the punishment can never be ahead of the crime (this is to the fact that the Russian Federation always answers).
  12. mmk
    mmk 20 September 2018 06: 26
    0
    it is time for the rebels to master Siberia, the couch rebels, who did not smell the work, but only distort the words of Navalny.