Military Review

Death of the North. About the extinction of the white race

171
Death of the North. About the extinction of the white race



The fourth world war is dangerous not only by plunging the whole of Eurasia into chaos and confusion, but also by the death of the global North, including Russia, and the white race, which was threatened with extinction and complete assimilation.

Political, national, religious, regional and even global conflicts are fading against the background of the growing confrontation between the rich North and the poor South and the problems of degradation and extinction of the white race, involution, simplification of all mankind. At the same time, the global North includes the geographic states located in the South: Israel, Australia, the white communities of South Africa, etc. The first sparks of this confrontation were already in the 20th century: Arab-Israeli wars, waves of migration of the Arab, African and Asian populations prosperous Europe, the collapse of Yugoslavia, the formation of the gangster enclave of Kosovo, the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Finally, in the 21st century: the “Arab Spring”, the collapse of a number of completely secular Arab states (the legacy of the Arab socialism project) such as Libya and Syria, the creation of a “black caliphate”, the opening of the Middle Eastern front of world war (Iraq and Syria with branches in Libya and Yemen) . The chaos of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Iran and Russia was drawn into the Middle Eastern crater, which made the “front” regional. Plus the interests of the EU, NATO, the United States and China.

The main problem of the beginning of the war of civilizations is that the huge masses of the population in Eurasia and Africa have no future. No local or global development project. The Soviet project was destroyed. Muammar Gaddafi created in Libya the core of an African project based on socialism and Islam. This project gave hope for a better life to hundreds of millions of people (a big idea, a private currency free from the dollar, the vast resources of the Black Continent, including labor, etc.). But the West destroyed it, returned it with the help weapons Libya in the past. In the global project of the West, Africa, like most of the planet, of humanity, is a source of raw materials, energy and a huge number of "extra people" who must be destroyed. China is trying to promote its global project. But it works mainly on economic priority, the Great Kingdom does not have a big idea that can inspire, inspire people. Many believe that Western economic bondage will be replaced by a new one - the Chinese one. As a result, destruction is stronger than creation.

It turns out that on the planet hundreds of millions (several billion) of people are superfluous. They are not needed by anyone except themselves. More and more people, especially strong growth occurs in Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Resources less. At the same time, the growth of consumption under the conditions of a society of consumption and self-destruction (people kill themselves because of excessive and improper nutrition, tobacco, alcohol, drugs, lack of physical culture, pollution of water, air, soil, etc.) led to a global biosphere crisis . A number of signs indicate that a global catastrophe may occur on the planet. There was a sharp increase in negative natural phenomena: activity of volcanoes, earthquakes, powerful fires across the planet, heavy rains, snowfalls, hurricanes, etc. That is, people in a consumer society behave like a virus that kills the planet. And the Earth, as a living, highly organized system, is responsible.

The masters of the West also see this, therefore, for more than a decade they have been talking about “excess population” and the need to reduce it. The corresponding policy is also carried out: abortion, contraception propaganda; propaganda of all sorts of perversions (perverts do not have children); promotion of the creation of childless “families” or with one child; the creation of such socio-economic conditions that birth becomes an extremely disadvantageous step (dramatically worsens the quality of life of parents); transfer of people into virtual, digital worlds, separation from real life with the extinction of normal, human instincts and aspirations, and more. another.

But so far this policy of childlessness has won mainly only in the developed North. In the South, fertility also fell, but not so much. So it turns out that behind the army of jihad (“black caliphate”) there is a billion-strong army of people who have no future in Africa, Latin America and Asia. So it was for centuries, and people put up with it. And earlier on the planet a slave civilization reigned (the West subdued almost the entire planet) with the division of people into masters and slaves. But in the 20th century, everything changed. First, with the help of mass TV and the Internet, the people of the poor South saw another world. Rich, well-fed, beautiful, where even the poor are fed and given overnight. Where idlers can live on benefits and even get social housing. And with the help of “black” or “gray” business, you can live well and even get rich, and the punishments (repressions) are insignificant.

Secondly, people were able to get to another world, the metropolis, the core of capitalism, the countries of the West. Planes, ships, trains, motor transport, and where ordinary boats tied the planet into one. And Africans, Asians and Latin Americans are trying to get to the North by hook or by crook. Trump knowingly pays so much attention to the wall on the border with Mexico. He and the people behind him understand this. Similar walls are trying to build in Europe, creating "green zones", separate rich, fenced with barriers and security villages, neighborhoods. But in general, the North is sinking in the waves of the new great migration.

Hundreds of millions of people in the South dream of images of the rich North. They dream of getting rid of the lack of water, food, access to seemingly limitless consumption and such a beautiful life, pop culture, without tribal, national, religious, cultural frameworks, restrictions and prohibitions. Tens of millions are making efforts to move to the North. Millions succeed. In addition, thousands, tens of thousands of young people join the army of jihad, absorb hatred from the rich world of the “golden calf”, which itself rot and poison the rest of the world with its miasms. And in the context of a global war, the turmoil situation is worsening, gaining momentum. For example, earlier, under Gaddafi, Libya was a prosperous state, giving many Arabs and Africans work, housing, and the future. Now it has been destroyed, and Libya is not a barrier to chaos, but another zone of inferno. The situation is similar in Syria. Next up is a possible collapse of Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other countries, which will cause another huge wave of migration to the North.

Russia is threatened by a new war in the Caucasus and the collapse of the post-Soviet republics of Central Asia, which will cause a multimillion wave of refugees. The Caucasus and Central Asia after the collapse of the USSR are also drowning in the archaic and have no future without a development project with Russia. All other scenarios are rather gloomy: an inferno zone like Afghanistan, where the main production in the country is the production of drugs, with constant slaughter on national, religious, clan soil, with fights for diminishing sources of income, land and water; Chinese colonization; complete submission to the West with its handouts and the possibility at any moment to collapse into inferno; There is no single Islamic project, in particular, Turkey with the project of the “red caliphate” and the idea of ​​pan-Turkism is unable to independently create a zone of prosperity in Central Asia (Turkestan).

It is worth remembering that earlier, before the collapse of the Soviet civilization and the project, the South had hope and a common project of joint development. After killing the USSR, the West destroyed the global equilibrium, the socialist development project for the South. That is, he strengthened the tendency of the great migration to the North. There is no hope in the South, the future and people are trying to get to the North, where, at least, there is plenty of water and food, a roof over their heads and clothes, and entertainment of big cities, the upcoming digital world.

The situation is worsening due to the degradation, decay of the West and the entire North, including Russia. Nowadays, in the West and in Russia, the urban way of life prevails, the traditional large family is a thing of the past. Moreover, in Russia, liberals and near-government circles continue to promote idea concentration of the population of about several dozen urban agglomerations (millionaires), encouraging citizens to gather there. And this leads to both the degradation of the person himself and death historical Of Russia. The extinction of the people will continue, and the Russians after some time, quite soon historically, will lose most of the territory of the country that our ancestors created and built over a millennium.

The urban civilization has led to the fact that in the North a large family goes into the past. Previously, despite the high mortality rate due to underdeveloped medicine and low levels of hygiene, parents left behind three or more children. From about the middle of the 20th century, revolutionary changes took place in the evolutionary development of man. Science and, above all, medicine with hygiene, have made great strides forward. Children, and adult mortality were sharply reduced. At the same time there was an agrarian (green) revolution, which significantly increased the production of agricultural products. As a result, where the patriarchal way of life with large families has been preserved, that is, in the South (at least partially), the growth of the population went on increasing scales and rates. In 1927, there were 2 billion people on Earth, 1974 in year - 4 billion, in 1999 year - 6 billion, in a few years there will be 8 billion people on the planet. And most of the growth is in the global South. For example, in 1939, the population of Egypt was 16,5 million, in 2000, 66 million, in 2010, more than 80 million. In 2017, the population of Egypt increased to 94,8 million. Thus, since the previous population census 2007 of the year, the number of Egyptian residents has increased by 22 million. And over the past 30 years, population growth has been 96,5%. The forecast for 2050 year is more than 150 million people.

Thus, the population of the planet is still growing rapidly, but mainly at the expense of the South. North is dying out. This applies to the white race - this is how Russia, Poland, Ukraine, Germany, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and other countries are dying out. Part of this process has affected other races, civilizations. In particular, Japan is rapidly aging and dying out (it can also be included in the global North), where the urban lifestyle has won and the digital, virtual world is rapidly coming.

The transition from a rural to an urban way of life, a crisis of spiritual and moral values, spiritual degradation of people with an emphasis on hedonism, materialism, their corruption, sexual revolution led to the fact that a person has lost the need for a family and children. Global suicide of the white race (partially other races and peoples who are mired in post-industrial madness). Indeed, in order for the people to live, two parents must be replaced by an average of 2,1-2,2 children per family. That is, half of the families should have three or more children in order for a normal process of generational change and at least a slight increase in the population to take place. For example, in today's Russia - an average of 1,5-1,7 children per family. The extinction of Russia is not yet so noticeable simply because of the migration influx. The same process is taking place in European countries, somewhere faster, somewhere slower.

To keep a normal family, it is necessary to live in the countryside, in your homestead. That is, the state should develop the countryside, small towns and villages, low-rise construction, comprehensively support large families (information and material), making them the basis of the population of Russia. Currently, the opposite is happening. The village is dying out, as are villages and small towns. Big cities are growing, but at the expense of degradation and extinction of the surrounding territory. In the city, children are not needed, as they worsen the well-being of parents, their opportunities in the field of obtaining various pleasures. Children have become a burden and a factor in poverty. As a result, young people are in no hurry to have children, they are content with cohabitation. Families are increasingly single-child or childless. The result is depopulation, that is, the extinction of the North and the white race.

And all this against the background of the growing migration pressure of the global South and the qualitative degradation of man, humanity. In fact, approximately since the fall of the USSR, involution began, the simplification of humanity. Its qualitative degradation.

To be continued ...
Author:
171 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard 6 September 2018 10: 06
    +23
    First of all, the governments of these countries are to blame for these problems ... tolerance is the disease that destroys the white race ... everyone else does not get sick ... The rest of the world perceives it as weakness and a duty to them ... but honestly expensive ... I don’t feel that I owe anyone other than my family and Russia ...
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 6 September 2018 10: 10
      +16
      Muammar Gaddafi created in Libya the core of the African project on the basis of socialism and Islam. This project gave hope for a better life to hundreds of millions of people (a big idea, its own currency, free of the dollar, huge resources of the Black Continent, including labor, etc.). But the West destroyed it, returned Libya to the past with the help of weapons
      Thanks to Medvedev, the president at that time. from his silent inaction ...
      1. Pax tecum
        Pax tecum 6 September 2018 10: 44
        +3
        Dear author! Quite relevant and interesting article, but for some reason the article does not contain the term "geopolitics".
        But, after all, everything you describe (especially in the context of the confrontation between the North and the South) is nothing more than geopolitics, but with elements of subjective detailing.
        It would be very interesting, to continue the article, precisely from the point of view of geopolitics, to reveal many contemporary problems and conflicts, and especially of Russia, as an active actor.

        Indeed, interestingly, geopolitics was not officially recognized as a science in the USSR, therefore, no geopolitical concepts and provisions existed in the USSR, but the Union acted in the international arena as one of the leading geopolitical actors. That's the paradox ...
        What if geopolitics were developed as a science?
        History of international relations = geopolitics.
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 6 September 2018 11: 13
          +5
          Quote: Pax tecum
          but for some reason the article does not contain the term "geopolitics"

          In the world there are only unambiguous concepts of what is:

          - domestic policya policy aimed at citizens of one state;
          - foreign policypolicy aimed at citizens of other states;
          - global politics, a policy aimed at all inhabitants of the Earth.

          There is no unambiguously understood term for what "geopolitics" is. The purpose of this term is to hide global politics. Use only the above terms about politics in the described understanding and many things happening in the World will become much clearer.
          1. Pax tecum
            Pax tecum 7 September 2018 13: 25
            +1
            Boris55 (Boris)
            ... There is no term that is unambiguously understood by everyone, what is "geopolitics". The purpose of this term is to hide global politics.

            Well, you tell me too! No.
            You, downright, deny this scientific direction as in Soviet times (then it was understandable, because geopolitics was considered a "bourgeois pseudoscience"), replacing concepts and definitions. Although the entire foreign policy of the USSR is pure geopolitics, but without a conceptual basis.
            Unfortunately, I do not see the word "geography" in your definitions.
            For example, the USSR and the USA are the main geopolitical actors, albeit with different scientific approaches.
            Geopolitics is a science. Geopolitics as a science arose at the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. Its appearance was due primarily to the need for understanding the new political realities.
            There are definitions and the concept of geopolitics as a science.

            Here, for example, is a generalized definition:
            Geopolitics (geographical policy; Greek: γῆ - land, πολιτική - state or public affairs) - the direction of political thought, the concept of control over the territory, the laws of distribution and redistribution of spheres of influence (power centers) of different states and interstate associations. It belongs to the kind of socio-geographical sciences, is part of political geography.
            Distinguish between traditional geopolitics, new geopolitics (geoeconomics) and the latest geopolitics (geophilosophy).
            Traditional geopolitics focuses on the military-political power of the state and the dominant role of geographical factors in the capture of foreign territories, being (according to Haushofer) the "geographical mind" of the state. Geoeconomics, unlike traditional geopolitics, focuses on the economic power of the state.
            The latest geopolitics, in which fortitude dominates military and economic power, helps to overcome traditional geographical and economic determinism by expanding the basic factors that determine the behavior of states in international relations.
            For modern geopolitical theory, the study of forms of control over space is of great importance, taking into account the technological capabilities that states have (forms of such control: political, military, economic, civilizational, communication, demographic, information).
      2. spiriolla-45
        spiriolla-45 6 September 2018 11: 43
        +5
        Dimon carried out and is following the instructions of a mentor and never had his political will.
      3. credo
        credo 6 September 2018 14: 46
        +5
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Muammar Gaddafi created in Libya the core of the African project on the basis of socialism and Islam. This project gave hope for a better life to hundreds of millions of people (a big idea, its own currency, free of the dollar, huge resources of the Black Continent, including labor, etc.). But the West destroyed it, returned Libya to the past with the help of weapons
        Thanks to Medvedev, the president at that time. from his silent inaction ...

        You have a too simplistic view of the history of Libya. Do you know for certain that Libya turned to Russia for help and Russia refused it? Or do you think that Russia should help everyone without any agreements or understandings simply because someone committed aggression against someone.
      4. KaPToC
        KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 35
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        This project gave hope to a better life for hundreds of millions of people.

        I will note that there were no Russians among these hundreds of millions of people, so why did the Russians have to defend their "better life" if they did not do it themselves? These "hundreds of millions of people"!
      5. k174oun7
        k174oun7 9 September 2018 22: 21
        +2
        On the part of the DAM, there was not a tacit consent, but a conscious and voiced decision to support the so-called. no-fly zones over Libya by the Libyan aviation. NATO received the "right" to destroy Libyan aircraft. In the list of "glorious deeds" LADIES ban on the supply of a paid contract for the supply of S-300 to Iran. Again, at the request of the "partners". In other words, Iran's blessing for the Libyan scenario. Dmitry Anatolyevich he is.
    2. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don 6 September 2018 10: 58
      +9
      Hmm, let's look at this problem from Russia, for example, take the Far East, it will take 50-70 years and territories will be ethnically lost for Russia (((, migrants will exceed the local population hundreds of times more, they are more active and hardworking, they choose their mayor (head of administration), hold a referendum (possibly a power version) and all (((. So do not guess what will happen, but there will be a widespread confusion and territorial change of ethnic groups throughout the entire European-Asian part of the planet Earth.
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 6 September 2018 15: 47
        +4
        For this, I believe that quotas for migrants and forced resettlement are necessary to prevent the creation of enclaves and assimilation by the indigenous population.
        1. mgero
          mgero 6 September 2018 17: 26
          -2
          Migranti tut neprichem, esli ruskie jenshini rajali 3-5 times migrantom nechevo bilo delot v rasii.
          1. igorbrsv
            igorbrsv 6 September 2018 20: 12
            +2
            My ne against migrants. No esly k nam edut, doljny byt assimilirovany. S jenshinami my rasberemsia
        2. igor1981
          igor1981 7 September 2018 14: 56
          +2
          Quote: igorbrsv
          For this, I believe that quotas for migrants and forced resettlement are necessary to prevent the creation of enclaves and assimilation by the indigenous population.


          What a quota, what a settlement. In Russia, these Asians and Caucasians are not needed at all. They only dampen salaries. A visa regime is needed with all the Central Asian republics, the same applies to Transcaucasia. For example, in Russia there are already as many Armenians as there are in Armenia itself, I’m not talking about the rest. They wanted independence, they got independence, they called the Russians the invaders, and now they themselves are eager for the invaders. And check their Russian citizenship, as they received it, since 1991. Ethnic Russian and indigenous peoples of Russia is not affected.
          1. KaPToC
            KaPToC 7 September 2018 16: 28
            +3
            Quote: igor1981
            And check their Russian citizenship, as they received it, since 1991.

            They received it on the fact of living in the RSFSR at the time of the collapse of the USSR.
            Quote: igor1981
            Ethnic Russian and indigenous peoples of Russia is not affected.

            In the USSR, they were ethnically local.
            Quote: igor1981
            In Russia, these Asians and Caucasians are not needed at all.

            Have more children and the state will close the border for migrants.
          2. RussKote
            RussKote 8 September 2018 19: 51
            0
            And you, dear, have forgotten that in the republics of Central Asia since the time of the collapse of the USSR quite a lot of Russians remained? At the moment, there are about 4 million people who are just eager to leave, and now you propose introducing a visa regime with these countries?
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Semen1972
      Semen1972 6 September 2018 14: 24
      -14
      Quote: Vard
      tolerance is the disease that destroys the white race.

      Are you a nationalist or racist?
      1. Greenwood
        Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 24
        +8
        Do you like black? That's just honest. laughing
        1. mgero
          mgero 6 September 2018 17: 28
          -3
          Russian jenshini v dalii OT metropolli lyubyat chornich tak kak belie alkashi ili ix netu. Ya ob bolshistve imel vvidu.
          1. igorbrsv
            igorbrsv 6 September 2018 20: 17
            +1
            Vy uvereny chto eto russkie jenshiny? Ya lublu exoticu. Imel chest imet s vashei strany predpolojitelno jenshin. me ne ponravilos
          2. igorbrsv
            igorbrsv 6 September 2018 20: 21
            +1
            Mne nravytsia your vsroslye filmy. Kstaty skolko v Russii nacionalnostei? Ya russkii
          3. KaPToC
            KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 39
            +7
            Quote: mgero
            Russian jenshini v dalii OT metropolli lyubyat chornich tak kak belie alkashi ili ix netu.

            Apparently you live in this very outback, so deep in .... that there is not even a keyboard with a Russian font.
            Is it hard to live in this same GERMAN hinterland with Germans drunks and blacks?
    4. Megatron
      Megatron 6 September 2018 15: 14
      +10
      Everything is simple, do not let refugees go, it also concerns us first of all, introduce a visa regime with the CIS countries, illegal migration should be a criminal offense and check the issuance of citizenship over the past 25 years. But our big business needs cheap slaves at construction sites.
    5. KaPToC
      KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 32
      -3
      Quote: Vard
      The governments of these countries are primarily to blame for these problems ...

      What a deep thought. Can’t you give more details?
      Quote: Vard
      tolerance is the disease that destroys the white race ... everyone else does not get it ...

      In how wassat tolerance is to blame.
    6. EvilLion
      EvilLion 7 September 2018 08: 26
      +2
      Excuse me, but stagnant and perestroika, that is, a completely fed USSR, in which the birth rate was also quite urban, and the population grew only in Central Asia, too, is tolerant?
  2. steelmaker
    steelmaker 6 September 2018 10: 11
    +9
    One statement of facts! What to do? I already know that over the past 25 years, Russia is dying out, Africa does not interest me. What to do? Change the economy of the country! Economic course! In a different way. But for now, Putin and the oligarchs in power, Russia will die out.
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 6 September 2018 10: 32
      -7
      Quote: steel maker
      Change the economy of the country! Economic course! In a different way.

      Who will do this, specifically names, surnames, can you name the party? Tell us those saints who will bless the country! bully
      1. ancestors from Don
        ancestors from Don 6 September 2018 11: 25
        +8
        Quote: Nasr
        Quote: steel maker
        Change the economy of the country! Economic course! In a different way.

        Who will do this, specifically names, surnames, can you name the party? Tell us those saints who will bless the country! bully

        I always didn’t understand this question “who will be?”, So I have a counter question, are there really no worthy people among the 140 million people who are able to govern? most likely you were accustomed to this idea that people who are now in power are not replaceable (((.
        1. Nasrat
          Nasrat 6 September 2018 11: 35
          -3
          Quote: ancestors from the Don
          most likely you have been accustomed to this idea that the people who are now in power are not interchangeable

          Apparently, the authorities did not accustom you to such a thought ...., in connection with this I have a question for you - so who will benefit us? You can name those of 140 million ....
          1. ancestors from Don
            ancestors from Don 6 September 2018 11: 41
            +13
            Quote: Nasr
            Apparently, the authorities did not accustom you to such a thought ...., in connection with this I have a question for you - so who will benefit us? You can name those of 140 million ....

            Again you ask a question, the answer to which lies in the question itself. The current government has adopted laws for itself and will not allow anyone who thinks differently to come close to the elections. You are expecting from me surnames, attendance and passwords, so I will not voice them, so as not to stir up a pointless discussion here. It is enough only that the NON-CHANGEABLE power in one person, which constitutes the legislative, executive and supervisory functions "decays", becomes overgrown with corruption components and does not develop in the interests of the people (((.
            1. Nasrat
              Nasrat 6 September 2018 11: 52
              -1
              Quote: Ancestors from the Don
              It is enough only that the UNCHANGEABLE power in one person the constituent legislative, executive and oversight function "decays", becomes overgrown with corruption components and does not develop in the interests of the people (((.


              And when in Russia it was different? And you hope that the newcomers will change something? You are at least naive ..
              1. Overland whale
                Overland whale 6 September 2018 19: 57
                +2
                Well, in China, all 5 years of its history were also exactly like this - there was an emperor and officials. But new realities of the 000th century came, and Deng Xiaoping, before his death, gave the order to the CCP - there must be a change of power, otherwise China will again fall into stagnation. And so far we see that the Chinese comrades are observing this order. Or they could also say: "When was it different in Great China?"
          2. 4eburasha
            4eburasha 6 September 2018 15: 25
            +1
            So .. it's clear who. If a citizen sang about "irreplaceable power", and even highlighted it in capital letters, then, in my opinion, there is no need to ask. And so everything is clear ...
          3. akunin
            akunin 6 September 2018 19: 13
            +4
            Quote: Nasr
            You can name those of 140 million ....
            and bulk (how to pile)? and yavlinsky? and zyuganov? laughing laughing laughing Dear, we have a lot of competent, honest people (maybe in your environment), but there are Sechin, Miller, etc., who will not give up financial flows, there is a tired guarantor whom all this suits.
        2. KaPToC
          KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 43
          0
          Quote: ancestors from the Don
          Really among 140 million people there are no worthy people able to manage

          They are worthy, only these same 140 million will eat the one who takes extremely POPULAR measures - aimed at increasing the birth rate and saving the nation. Here, the most popular president in the world was almost seized for not yet adopted pension reform.
      2. mgero
        mgero 6 September 2018 17: 31
        -6
        Esli nekogo, znachit vi daljni nachat menyat chto to. Esli vi lyubite Rassiyu koneshno. Ya lyublyu Armeniyu i tam chto to ya menyal Nu chutochku skajem tak.
    2. Sadko88
      Sadko88 6 September 2018 10: 33
      +5
      Why are other nations and races going to Russia and not bother? Their education. They increase their birth rate and do not complain about power. Help each other. Perhaps the so-called white race snickered? Lazy and lost her willpower? Perhaps childhood syndrome in adults is progressing and atheism. To each his own...
    3. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 6 September 2018 10: 36
      +5
      Does Putin interfere with the "planing" of children? Can't you pull? But what about large families? It's just that many people want to live for themselves, and not drag out existence for the sake of their children. Taking care of children is the direct responsibility of parents, not of the state. Improving living standards will not give expected results
      1. ancestors from Don
        ancestors from Don 6 September 2018 11: 05
        +1
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Does Putin interfere with the "planing" of children? Can't you pull? But what about large families? It's just that many people want to live for themselves, and not drag out existence for the sake of their children. Taking care of children is the direct responsibility of parents, not of the state. Improving living standards will not give expected results

        If YES is acceptable, naturally indirectly, its economic policy leads to the collapse of Russia, it became clear from the last confused speech that there will NOT be any breakthrough and years of the country's economic growth announced before the presidential election, but there will be patchwork and survival, so who in such conditions, if normally plans a family will be fruitful and multiply? In the best case, one or two children, i.e. reproduction of the population, but not growth (((((((((((((((((((((((((((.
      2. Greenwood
        Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 29
        +9
        Quote: igorbrsv
        But what about large families?
        There are only a few such families, and it is not easy for them to live (unless dad is some kind of thread a big businessman or department head).
        Quote: igorbrsv
        not eke out an existence for the sake of your children
        So the question is, is it really normal that having children, a family in our country dooms itself to "existence", and not a full-fledged worthy "life" ?!
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Caring for children is the direct responsibility of parents, not the state.
        Ok, then no draft army. If the state does not give the child anything, then it has no right to demand from him "to perform some kind of duty". And by the way, why such a state at all, which is not responsible for anything?
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Improving living standards will not produce the expected results.
        Naturally, there will be no immediate result, but people will have more opportunities for a full-fledged family life.
        1. igorbrsv
          igorbrsv 6 September 2018 15: 51
          0
          There will be more opportunities, but no more desire. I do not remember the crowds of large oligarchs
      3. KaPToC
        KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 45
        -1
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Improving living standards will not produce the expected results.

        On the contrary, the expected results will give a decrease in living standards.
    4. raw174
      raw174 6 September 2018 10: 50
      +7
      Quote: steel maker
      Change the economy of the country! Economic course!

      Hot with sour mix. To preserve the race (people), a high birth rate is needed, and it depends on upbringing and traditions. In order for the population to increase, the family must have at least three children, one child is a loss for the "livestock", two are marking time, three or more are an increase. The economy has nothing to do with it. Give birth and bring up!
      1. Sadko88
        Sadko88 6 September 2018 11: 39
        +7
        There is a concept of tactics and strategy. The strategy is handled by those to whom we have entrusted authority. The strategy is currently correct. And there is the concept of tactics. A tactical unit is a family. So I don’t know how you are, I am responsible for my family and its well-being. While I'm the head of the family, no one else. The happier my family, the better for the state. I better why? Not mean. Perhaps because parents unknowingly baptized at the Rogozh outpost. I honor John of Kronstadt. And you know, Thank God I’m not impoverished.
      2. Greenwood
        Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 32
        0
        Quote: raw174
        Give birth and bring up!
        And money? For the normal life of a Russian family, the total income of the spouses (and generally only men, because the wife should be at home with the children and not work) should be at least 80-100k rubles. Please tell me, where have you seen such salaries in the outback?
        1. vindigo
          vindigo 6 September 2018 17: 42
          +1
          They’ll tell you right now, read more books, study, work hard and everything will be the way. wink
        2. KaPToC
          KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 48
          -4
          Quote: Greenwood
          For the normal life of a Russian family, the total income of the spouses (and generally only men, because the wife should be at home with the children and not work) should be at least 80-100k rubles.

          Do you shift responsibility to children? How not ashamed. You need such amounts - for a sweet life. Children do not need much.
        3. raw174
          raw174 7 September 2018 07: 55
          +2
          Quote: Greenwood
          Quote: raw174
          Give birth and bring up!
          And money? For the normal life of a Russian family, the total income of the spouses (and generally only men, because the wife should be at home with the children and not work) should be at least 80-100k rubles. Please tell me, where have you seen such salaries in the outback?

          It is a common misconception that raising money requires a lot of money. Let's look at the world where the highest birth rate? in Norway, Germany, Switzerland? NOT! In Nigeria, Somalia and other Gabon! Look at the RF where there are more children? In the outback. My family has an income of about 40 thousand per month, three children, we do not live in poverty, we have enough for everything, we need to live within our means.
      3. mgero
        mgero 6 September 2018 17: 35
        -4
        Nachnite s sebya esli vam xot 50
      4. Overland whale
        Overland whale 6 September 2018 20: 21
        +3
        You tear off the reproduction of the population from the material base. Which peoples with reproduction are doing well? For those with a predominantly rural population (or those that have recently become more urban than rural peoples by historical standards) - among the peoples of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Latin America, Central Asia, and the rural white population USA and Canada (in the white families of the Bible Belt and the Mormon Circle in the USA there are no fewer than 3 children, much more often there are 4 to 5 children in the family), in farmer African families in South Africa, in Europe - among Icelanders (who recently became residents cities), the Faroese, the Norwegians, the Irish, in Western Ukraine (Bukovina, Galicia, Transcarpathia, Volyn), in Moldova. And the Russians have practically lost their rural way of life, which is why the type of reproduction they have is typically urban - 1 - 2 children, and even a lot of children without children. It is necessary to revive the village - only in this case an expanded reproduction of the population is possible.
    5. Victor N
      Victor N 6 September 2018 13: 56
      +2
      You need to change yourself: to work for the well-being of the family (and not for the car), not to ask for help, not to worry about the pension of which is not yet ...
      1. 4eburasha
        4eburasha 6 September 2018 15: 32
        -5
        Very few people understand this, and even less are willing to do it. They dream of changing Russia, or even the whole world, but they are not able to change themselves. Biomass, in short ..
        1. KaPToC
          KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 51
          -1
          Quote: 4eburasha
          Biomass, in short ..

          I put the minus one minus, well, nothing.
          This very biomass does not understand that without giving birth to children it will die out with its ideas and outlook on life. And those who give birth - advanced in the future their worldview, their vision of the world.
          1. 4eburasha
            4eburasha 12 September 2018 09: 34
            0
            "Biomass" in this context is not the one who gives birth or does not give birth to children, but the one who tries to "save the world" and at the same time is not able to save himself. You didn’t understand, or you didn’t want to understand. They clung to the word, but the meaning passed by ...
      2. Greenwood
        Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 33
        +3
        Quote: Victor N
        family well-being (and not by car)
        A car is quite an element of family well-being. To take a family to the same store by bus or taxi is ridiculous. And about trips to the countryside, to the village, etc. I am generally silent. Nowhere without a car.
    6. Semen1972
      Semen1972 6 September 2018 14: 32
      -3
      Quote: steel maker
      What to do? Change the economy of the country! Economic course! No other way

      Which way ????? Countries with a large population, where many children in the family are poor countries. Rich countries are few children. What is Putin doing wrong? Not Poor Yet ????
    7. KaPToC
      KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 41
      -1
      Quote: steel maker
      I already know that over the past 25 years, Russia is dying out, Africa does not interest me. What to do?

      The recipe is simple - cancel social benefits and pensions TOTALLY - and the birth rate will trample up. Only who will agree to this?
    8. EvilLion
      EvilLion 7 September 2018 08: 28
      -3
      Where do you come from? You eat even more under Putin than under the USSR, but all countries with a high level of urbanization are dying. And in Russia the situation is much better than the European average.
  3. Nitarius
    Nitarius 6 September 2018 10: 22
    +2
    no need to look for the extreme ... then the government is to blame for someone else ... the Old Believers live and don’t ask for anything .. but we always have someone to blame! so STOP YOUR WHOPPING!
    1. Semurg
      Semurg 6 September 2018 10: 29
      +1
      Recently I read about excavations in England in the area of ​​toli cheater toli sisters there they find the remains of completely black people who lived in England in ancient times, so the black race is quite possibly returning to its lands.
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 55
        +2
        Quote: Semurg
        Recently I read about excavations in England in the area of ​​toli cheater toli sister there they find the remains of completely black people

        These are the remains of Neanderthals, not blacks.
        1. aybolyt678
          aybolyt678 7 September 2018 09: 48
          0
          Quote: KaPToC
          These are the remains of Neanderthals, not blacks.

          neadertals - they were red
      2. EvilLion
        EvilLion 7 September 2018 08: 29
        +1
        In fact, the age of the Negroid race is only 11 thousand years. Cro-Magnon 40 thousand
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 6 September 2018 10: 31
      -2
      Quote: Nitarius
      no need to look for the extreme ... then the government is to blame for someone else ... the Old Believers live and don’t ask for anything .. but we always have someone to blame! so STOP YOUR WHOPPING!

      to the "Old Believers" throughout the country ...! fellow do not whine, eat less, live less, work more! straight: "arbayt maht fry" ... class!
      [media = http: //]
      1. Sadko88
        Sadko88 6 September 2018 10: 51
        -5
        You choose words and pictures for comments. Draws for more than censure ...
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 6 September 2018 10: 57
          +1
          Quote: Sadko88
          You choose words and pictures for comments. Draws for more than censure ...

          yah ? and comment
          Nitarius (nicholas

          Doesn't it bother you? agree that people are silent like a herd? let them do what they want with you?
          1. Sadko88
            Sadko88 6 September 2018 11: 14
            0
            Not my job. I to you as a commentator to a commentator hi Herd ... I’m a cynic myself, but when I talk about compatriots, even the crowd dislikes me ...
            1. 4eburasha
              4eburasha 6 September 2018 16: 24
              -4
              let them do what they want with you?
              Not with us, but with you. Let them do what they want with you, just to close this ubiquitous nagging.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. KaPToC
            KaPToC 6 September 2018 21: 59
            -2
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            agree that people are silent like a herd?

            The people, in pursuit of their rights, forgot about their duties, which by the way for some reason are not spelled out in the constitution, unlike rights. The woman’s primary duty is to give birth to children, for which they generally have such privileges in our country if we have a negative demography?
      2. Nitarius
        Nitarius 6 September 2018 10: 56
        +2
        I would advise you to look! so as not to say too much and not to offend anyone!
    3. cost 75
      cost 75 6 September 2018 10: 45
      +8
      Old Believers and who do not pay anything.
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 6 September 2018 16: 11
        +2
        They have nothing. But this does not affect the birth rate
    4. kakvastam
      kakvastam 6 September 2018 13: 09
      0
      Style, spelling, and punctuation indicate a primary school student. Recommendation, in fact, too.
    5. Semen1972
      Semen1972 6 September 2018 14: 32
      -1
      Quote: Nitarius
      then the government is to blame someone else

      Putin did not forbid to breed !!!!!
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 6 September 2018 22: 02
        +1
        Quote: Semen1972
        Putin did not forbid to breed !!!!!

        The law on women prescribes too many rights, for example, a woman can have an abortion without asking anyone, a woman can leave a child and there will be nothing for her, there are many such laws.
  4. parusnik
    parusnik 6 September 2018 10: 55
    +7
    Involution began, the simplification of mankind. Its quality degradation.
    ... Tough, but true ...
    1. Semen1972
      Semen1972 6 September 2018 15: 16
      -5
      ... Tough, but true ...

      Have you felt the same degradation on yourself?
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 7 September 2018 09: 52
        +2
        Quote: Semen1972
        Have you felt the same degradation on yourself?

        and who did not feel? in my opinion the whole society is fragmented, clear and understandable guidelines disappeared, it remains only to consume, consume, consume ..............................
        1. Semen1972
          Semen1972 7 September 2018 10: 46
          0
          Quote: aybolyt678
          and who did not feel? in my opinion the whole society is fragmented, clear and understandable guidelines disappeared, it remains only to consume, consume, consume .............................

          Excuse me, what landmark did you stole? Does someone make you consume? Who's stopping to buy a house in the village, chickens and stuff, and in the evening enjoy the sunsets ?? Could it be that Obama has robbed you of this ??? Can you clarify what meaning of life do you personally instill in your children?
          1. aybolyt678
            aybolyt678 8 September 2018 13: 14
            0
            Quote: Semen1972
            Excuse me, what landmark did you stole?

            Thanks for the question! I would certainly like to write in more detail, but I'm afraid you will not have the patience to read all this. In short, I’ll try like this - I don’t feel like part of a big and strong state, while I pay taxes, I live in the village, I have a three-story house in the village, I raise children, I have workers for whom I also pay taxes. In addition, I do not know what to teach children. I do not know what is good and what is bad in our time. Indeed, in our time, in order to do good for yourself, it is necessary for someone to feel bad, meaning to tear off the client more or pay less. In ancient Rome they said - homo homini lupus est - Man to man is a wolf. We were returned to the time of ancient Rome. Well, what kind of social development can we talk about ???
            1. Semen1972
              Semen1972 10 September 2018 11: 36
              -1
              Quote: aybolyt678
              Thanks for the question! I would certainly like to write in more detail, but I'm afraid you will not have the patience to read all this. In short, I’ll try like this - I don’t feel like part of a big and strong state, while I pay taxes, I live in the village, I have a three-story house in the village, I raise children, I have workers for whom I also pay taxes. In addition, I do not know what to teach children. I do not know what is good and what is bad in our time.

              Very strange position !!! Russia is booming as never before. The patriotic spirit flew up to heaven. We are more united than ever with power! One and all rejoice at the bombing of the enemies in Syria, how we in Ukraine without putting a single soldier and a cartridge defeated America, how we created the best military missile, how we conduct military exercises every day, how we make the best tanks and planes. How not a single spy leaves without punishment ... And what does it mean that children should be taught ?? !! To learn to love everything Russian and hate European-Amyroscoe !!! I, personally, are part of a large state, part of the Great Party, the President and the government !!!! Recently returned from a business trip in Germany ... I could not breathe in the Sheremetyevo airport after the stench of Europe !!
    2. Matroskin
      Matroskin 6 September 2018 15: 55
      +4
      And in my opinion such thoughts are thrown in by people like Chubais and who consider themselves to be the "golden billion". The conclusions were announced
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 6 September 2018 16: 15
        -2
        How many children does Chubais have? We’re talking about this. About the fact that not the standard of living prevents us from multiplying
  5. gorgo
    gorgo 6 September 2018 11: 01
    +2
    Many shout: "What to do ?!" And nothing can be done. You have to believe in God and that's it. Without spirituality, a person quite naturally turns into a selfish brute, concerned only with the question of satisfying his own bestial needs. This is so obvious that it’s even strange how you can not understand it. Faith calls a person up from the earth, from bestial nature to spiritual, from selfishness to selflessness for the sake of others. It's as clear as a clear day. But no, few people want to see this, and they are looking for the root of evil in Putin, in laws, in economics, politics ... And the root of evil is inside each of us. While people understood this, the country grew, strengthened and developed. As soon as people ceased to understand all this, problems and extinction emerged.
    And I get it. I’m writing to no avail, because no one will believe in anything. So everything is under its own power, and we can only watch this terrible picture ...
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 6 September 2018 11: 13
      +5
      That the root of the problem is within us, i.e. of each - this is definitely!
      1. ancestors from Don
        ancestors from Don 6 September 2018 11: 33
        +5
        Quote: Nasr
        That the root of the problem is within us, i.e. of each - this is definitely!

        this is a quote from the movie "Gangster Petersburg", its "antibiotic" was voiced laughing
        1. Nasrat
          Nasrat 6 September 2018 11: 39
          +4
          Hrenase, how a movie from the 90s hooked you ... you remember it in detail! ... what a horror ..
          1. ancestors from Don
            ancestors from Don 6 September 2018 11: 51
            +4
            Lev Borisov perfectly played that character, "sinful" I like films that really show the situation in a circle, and not fairy tales about Cinderellas, and since the film is catchy, you remember something))). Let's say the film "Liquidation" has long been disassembled into quotes.
            1. Nasrat
              Nasrat 6 September 2018 12: 01
              +1
              Quote: Ancestors from the Don
              Let's say the film "Liquidation" has long been disassembled into quotes.

              I didn’t even hear about this ... about which I do not regret ...
    2. KaPToC
      KaPToC 6 September 2018 22: 04
      +2
      Quote: gorgo
      Believing in God is necessary and all.

      Can God in our country legally prohibit abortion?
  6. vindigo
    vindigo 6 September 2018 11: 07
    +7
    Which family? Nowhere to live.
    1. Nitarius
      Nitarius 6 September 2018 11: 23
      +1
      and you go beyond the MKAD)) and you will see people there)) and the vast expanses of Russia mother))
    2. Sadko88
      Sadko88 6 September 2018 11: 23
      -1
      Type in YouTube - Primitive technology. Or lawyer Egorov. They will talk about housing
    3. kakvastam
      kakvastam 6 September 2018 13: 16
      +1
      Where is it?
      Or okromya Moscow mother in Russia there are no places left?
      1. vindigo
        vindigo 6 September 2018 17: 12
        +4
        I have never been to Moscow. I'm talking about the lack of affordable housing.
    4. raw174
      raw174 6 September 2018 13: 36
      +1
      Quote: vindigo
      Nowhere to live.

      laughing Are you on a small island or something laughing
      You know, there is such a singer - Vyacheslav Myasnikov, he has many good songs, one of them is "Happiness", there are the following words:
      "I am happy every day, - say:" This does not happen! ",
      But I come home, and my sons hug me. "
      This is a very accurate answer to the question:
      Quote: vindigo
      What family?

      What is the meaning of life, if not raising children and procreation?
      1. Greenwood
        Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 34
        +3
        Quote: raw174
        What is the meaning of life, if not raising children and procreation?
        He is different for everyone.
      2. vindigo
        vindigo 6 September 2018 17: 11
        +2
        I'm talking about the lack of affordable housing.
        1. raw174
          raw174 7 September 2018 08: 05
          -1
          Quote: vindigo
          I'm talking about the lack of affordable housing.

          I bought a house in a mortgage, it is quite affordable and quite profitable.
    5. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 6 September 2018 16: 19
      +1
      There is also a Far Eastern hectare. The truth is far from the metro
      1. vindigo
        vindigo 11 September 2018 13: 33
        0
        Go there. A day later, run back to your Moscowabad
    6. KaPToC
      KaPToC 6 September 2018 22: 05
      -1
      Quote: vindigo
      Which family? Nowhere to live.

      17 square kilometers.
      It’s nowhere for the Japanese to live.
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 7 September 2018 09: 57
        +1
        Quote: KaPToC
        17 square kilometers.
        It’s nowhere for the Japanese to live.

        the northernmost of the Japanese islands is extremely low populated. In fact, they have enough space.
  7. Boozer
    Boozer 6 September 2018 11: 14
    +4
    The white race is dying !!! Black ..... gone everywhere !!! What to do??? Everything is lost!!! We are waiting for degradation !!! To be continued...
    (PS and in the sequel, the author will suggest recalling Hitler’s ideas)
    1. Sadko88
      Sadko88 6 September 2018 11: 22
      -2
      Poltorak inspired go winked
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 6 September 2018 17: 13
        +2
        At least two one and a half or five liter laughing
    2. kakvastam
      kakvastam 6 September 2018 13: 21
      +6
      The reaction is a little strange. You, apparently, yourself from "black ..... s", since you are so hooked?
      Sorry, not everyone likes becoming foreigners in their once country.
  8. steelmaker
    steelmaker 6 September 2018 11: 23
    +4
    On the Internet, I came across statistics: from1924 or 1926 to 1941, the population of Russia, only Russia increased by 20 million people. So power-state affects fertility or not?
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 6 September 2018 11: 29
      +5
      Quote: steel maker
      So power-state affects fertility or not?

      Uzbekistan
      TASHKENT, Aug 7 - Sputnik. The population of the republic by January 1, 2017 amounted to 32,1 million people. The corresponding figures are contained in the report of the State Statistics Committee on the demographic situation in the country.

      Thus, this indicator has grown by a factor of 1991 compared with 11,5, or by XNUMX million people.



      Read more: https://ru.sputniknews-uz.com/society/20170807/5977694/uzbekistan-naseleniye-statistika.html
  9. spiriolla-45
    spiriolla-45 6 September 2018 11: 41
    -2
    Quote: Vard
    First of all, the governments of these countries are to blame for these problems ... tolerance is the disease that destroys the white race ... everyone else does not get sick ... The rest of the world perceives it as weakness and a duty to them ... but honestly expensive ... I don’t feel that I owe anyone other than my family and Russia ...

    The same thing is happening with Russia, only with a greater speed, and this is due to the efforts of Vovochka with his gopkomponony.
  10. megavolt823
    megavolt823 6 September 2018 11: 47
    +7
    I did not quite understand what the author was trying to convey. Caution? Explain the essence of the phenomenon? The more primitive the people are, in terms of lifestyle, education, religion. Especially the high birth rate. Medicine is good for humans, but it is a killer of humanity. Interfering in natural selection leaving those who are not viable to live. And the use of science in terms of enrichment and weapons. All this is already understandable for those who are able to do 2 + 2. The peoples of northern Europe, however, as well as the whole of Europe. Not when they were not numerous. Wars, epidemics, other migration.
  11. lucul
    lucul 6 September 2018 11: 56
    +10
    The problem is solved quite easily, especially in Russia.
    I remind you that India is catching up with China in terms of population. So, they tried everything there to limit the birth rate.
    So - the most effective way to limit the birth rate - was the level of education of women. That is, the more educated a woman was, the less she gave birth to children (one child, no more).
    We have the same level of education of women is simply beyond the limit, compared with the rest of the world.
    For an uneducated woman, the only happiness is children (12-16 children as a rule).
    We can limit the educational level of our women - we will save the nation.
    1. kakvastam
      kakvastam 6 September 2018 13: 38
      +1
      There is one way to do without fooling women - to outsource childbirth. Organize strictly controlled factories - centers of surrogacy, and let "specialists" give birth to yourself.
      Actually, everything has been heading towards this for a long time - "women" are less and less willing to be women, they want to become universally asexual beings without any specialization, which is quite justified in the current crisis (in fact, the extinction) of the institution of the family.
      Once this mechanism is launched, human rights defenders, banks and insurance companies will make natural childbirth a luxury beyond the reach of mere mortals. And then Monsanto will catch up, and our descendants will be of high quality and standardized ...
      True, you can just jump to hijabs, bonfires, stoning and other joys of the dark ages, but this, it seems, will not bypass us.
      1. megavolt823
        megavolt823 6 September 2018 16: 26
        +4
        Modern society puts a lot on its head. This is true . Nature dictates to a woman in the same way, but differently than to a man. Physically strong, athletically complex, rebel and badass. Medieval warrior and hunter, procuring food and protecting. But in the modern world, this is a person with 3 convictions, scandalous and drinking from hopelessness. And on top of the economic pie (srul) 160 cm in a jump with glasses and a sick stomach. Or body 130 kg. Nature at a subconscious level pushes the woman to the best of her ability, if you want. And if society does not exert influence on a woman, then she is weird not knowing what she wants. This is not much I have simplified (exaggerated), but in every joke there is ........ hi
    2. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 6 September 2018 17: 09
      0
      . We can limit the educational level of our women - we will save the nation
      It smacks of misogyny, but I'm for
    3. vindigo
      vindigo 6 September 2018 17: 14
      -1
      I don’t know what is beyond. But just the mind of our women do not shine.
    4. Overland whale
      Overland whale 6 September 2018 20: 46
      0
      Studies of Soviet ethnographers N. and I. Cheboksarov, conducted in the late 80s in different republics of the USSR, say differently, namely: the level of education of women influenced the number of children in a family only in the RSFSR, BSSR, USSR, in the Baltic , in Georgia; partially influenced in Moldova, in Armenia, in Azerbaijan, in Kazakhstan; did not influence at all in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. That is, if in Russia a woman without education gave birth to 4 children, and a woman with a higher education - 2 children, then in Uzbekistan, for example, both gave birth on average the same number of children (for that period - 5 per woman). Why is that? Anyone who has lived and / or been in Uzbekistan will understand. Because even when living in cities, Uzbeks preserve the rural type of social structure - mahallas, council of senior mahallas, everyone knows and helps each other, youth is under the supervision and care of elders, etc. And Russians, living in cities, atomize and often they can’t even find a normal pair for creating a family. The root of the problem is the Russian loss of rural lifestyle.
      1. EvilLion
        EvilLion 7 September 2018 08: 34
        -1
        Living in the city with a rural way of life is problematic and you are unlikely to want to live now in the impoverished Uzbekistan, which has nowhere to put this population.
        1. Overland whale
          Overland whale 7 September 2018 13: 57
          0
          We are not discussing the standard of living in this or that country, but the birth rate and the reasons for this level. Moreover, my desire / unwillingness to live in Uzbekistan has nothing to do with it. And living in a rural manner in a large modern city is just about Uzbekistan, where even in Tashkent an apartment is not considered a full-fledged home for a family, it is called a "section" and, according to local Uzbeks, is suitable only as temporary housing for students, for young families , who collect for home / build a house, and for Russians. Any normal Uzbek will work for years in Russia, but he will definitely buy / build a house, albeit a small one, for his family, in which his numerous children will be born - as the minimum minimum - there will be three of them, but much more often there will be 4 5-6 people. And for all of them there is quite enough space in this small house in a makhalla on the outskirts of Tashkent, where all the neighbors know each other well, and will help to look after the children in case of anything, and help the old people. And then all of them, when they turn 18 - 20 years old, will come together to Russia - but what can you do, you need to earn money on your own house, otherwise where will their own 4 - 5 children grow up?
          1. EvilLion
            EvilLion 7 September 2018 14: 36
            0
            Well, will we use the experience of mice and rabbits?
            And there will be no Russia in the world, where will they go?
    5. Afterparty
      Afterparty 11 September 2018 20: 16
      0
      The most adequate comment. I completely agree, except for the "transcendental level of education", the maximum is good, let's say so and I think it is not necessary to increase education in the whole world and it will become easier to live, otherwise they will amaze ...
  12. Molot1979
    Molot1979 6 September 2018 12: 44
    -3
    The author raves
    1. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 6 September 2018 17: 06
      +2
      But the topic touched upon the necessary
  13. Alex66
    Alex66 6 September 2018 12: 48
    +8
    Do you think they go to Europe to work, to study? No, they go to devour it, devour it like a cancer tumor (its cells divide faster) rebuilding the body, in this case the state and tolerance in this case, migrants are on hand, but that's why Europe needs it. But Europe doesn’t need it, those who are preparing a new war with Russia need Europeans will not fight, they will be, they are, much less experience. Their aggression is deployed on us as they set Hitler on.
    1. kakvastam
      kakvastam 6 September 2018 13: 47
      +3
      they go to devour her, devour like a cancer tumor
      I must admit, migrants do not bother with anything like that, they just want good for themselves, and better if at someone else’s expense. Normal behavior for a true liberal, and therefore goes with a bang.
      And the fact that they will eventually devour it is simply a natural result. Getting parasites, do not wait for help from them.
      One consolation is that when the barbarians destroy European civilization, they will either die of hunger themselves or build something of their own.
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 6 September 2018 17: 04
        +1
        If you are now preoccupied with migration, it is quite possible to solve these problems with assimilation
  14. kakvastam
    kakvastam 6 September 2018 13: 06
    +9
    For some reason, in my native "millionaire" I regularly observe the following picture: a Central Asian mother is walking, rolling a stroller with a baby, and two older ones are stomping next to them, two or three years old. Sometimes there are two such mothers, or even three ...
    And for Armenians, three children are not a problem, and for Azerbaijanis - and only Russians imitate the Chinese: "one family - one child"!
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 38
      +3
      Quote: kakvastam
      Chinese people imitate: "one family - one child"
      The Chinese have already canceled this decree. Now you can have 2, and all small nations - an unlimited number. In mixed families, for example, a Chinese husband and a Russian wife, the number of children is also not limited.
      1. kakvastam
        kakvastam 18 October 2018 20: 59
        0
        I know. It's just that everything is copied with a delay ...
    2. EvilLion
      EvilLion 7 September 2018 08: 35
      0
      Well, what else should mom do when you don’t need to work.
  15. Yan Sergeev
    Yan Sergeev 6 September 2018 13: 44
    +1
    On the mountain stands a white church, and that mountain is a mound, and that mound is poured over an oak chest in which there is a silver casket. And in the chest - Russian.
  16. BAI
    BAI 6 September 2018 14: 30
    +1
    The first sparks of this confrontation were already in the XX century

    Something the author finely swims. It was necessary to begin with the era of colonization: the colonization of both the Americas, India, Africa, Australia.
    And you could start with the campaigns of Alexander the Great.
    1. Semen1972
      Semen1972 6 September 2018 17: 40
      -1
      Quote: BAI
      Something the author finely swims. It was necessary to begin with the era of colonization: the colonization of both the Americas, India, Africa, Australia.
      And you could start with the campaigns of Alexander the Great.

      Why???
  17. 4eburasha
    4eburasha 6 September 2018 15: 05
    +2
    The author writes about the Fourth World War ... I confess to ask - but what, was the Third already? I somehow missed this moment ... I know little about conspiracy theories, so I ask experts to explain to me - where was the Third World War? When? Who participated? Who has won?
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 6 September 2018 15: 39
      +1
      Quote: 4eburasha
      The author writes about the Fourth World War ... I confess to ask - but what, was the Third already?
      Is this the only thing that interested you in the article? lol
      1. 4eburasha
        4eburasha 12 September 2018 09: 47
        0
        Quote: Greenwood
        Quote: 4eburasha
        The author writes about the Fourth World War ... I confess to ask - but what, was the Third already?
        Is this the only thing that interested you in the article? lol

        Well, right it’s very funny, nowhere else to go! The article, to say the least, is controversial in many respects. And the given thesis is also incomprehensible to me. So what did I commit seditious by asking this question? You are always joked about when you ask questions, and you extrapolate it to others?
    2. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 6 September 2018 21: 20
      +1
      Quote: 4eburasha
      Where was the Third World? When? Who participated? Who has won?

      you obviously confuse world and domestic wars. The third world is in full swing ... but its transition to a qualitatively new level will be the fourth obviously
      1. 4eburasha
        4eburasha 12 September 2018 09: 42
        +1
        I do not confuse. But thanks for the clarification.
  18. Vlad Petrov
    Vlad Petrov 6 September 2018 16: 03
    +2
    The author of the article pointed out "In order to maintain a normal family, you must live in the countryside, in your home-estate." Why do southern peoples have large families? Because most live in the countryside. Also, emigrants from the south in the industrial cities of the north will have small families in a couple of generations. The enclaves and diasporas of emigrants will only slow down the process a little, well, for another couple of generations. It is not possible for a simple emigrant to engage in agriculture, to be the owner of the land and manor in Europe, it is expensive. In Russia, there may be as much abandoned land as you like, but there is nothing to do there without a large strong family. The question is if the travel. normal, hardworking, what were the Russian peasant women of the past centuries among the current citizens?
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 6 September 2018 21: 22
      +2
      Quote: Vlad Petrov
      Why do southern nations have large families? Because most live in the countryside.

      not! they have large families by virtue of upbringing - the main thing is to give birth, and there Allah will help circumcision too - in circumcised ones, masturbation is impossible
  19. Mustached Kok
    Mustached Kok 6 September 2018 16: 24
    +3
    Firstly, what does urbanism have to do with it? The development and growth of the urban population was still in ancient Greece. And the Romans rebuilt this into the principle of urban civilization that we see today. But something I don’t see that would make us worse. Moreover, we came to the present state and level of development due to the fact that in the 10th century we decided to return to the principle of urbanism after XNUMX long centuries of the stagnant Middle Ages (those same spiritual times with large hungry families of peasants and smelly cities). And to put the factor of increasing the number of urban population as the cause of the future demographic crisis - at least disrespect for the history and development of mankind.
    Second, the article pays very little attention to politics. After all, it was she who led to the current situation. And "the masters of the West decided that there are too many people" or "came up with tolerance and perversions to reduce reproduction" this is not politics - this is conspiracy!
    The article raises the right topics and poses the right questions, but does not answer them with reasonable arguments and calculations. And conspiracy theories based on stereotypes. And "to return spirituality" is NOT at all like a solution to the problem!
    1. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 6 September 2018 16: 56
      +1
      ... And "to return spirituality" is NOT at all like a solution to the problem!

      Here I completely agree. The preaching of religions leads to a split in society. Therefore, the USSR tried to replace it with ideology.
      Speaking of Romans. How many children in their family were on average. Something seems to me now when it was time to think
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 6 September 2018 22: 16
        +1
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Here I completely agree. The preaching of religions leads to a split in society. Therefore, the USSR tried to replace it with ideology.

        However, any ideology will likewise lead to a split in society.
      2. Normal ok
        Normal ok 7 September 2018 10: 34
        +1
        Quote: igorbrsv
        How many children were on average in their family?

        Fertility in Rome was high. Mortality from disease, too.
    2. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 6 September 2018 21: 35
      -2
      Quote: Mustachioed Kok
      Tatya raises the right topics and poses the right questions, but answers them with no judicious arguments and calculations.

      all she answers! you just obviously did not ask the question - what will happen when the oil runs out? And this is the end of the "development" that we see now. All the benefits of today's civilization are petrochemistry and oil-energy, even roads cannot be built without bitumen. And he is not enough now! 70 percent of electricity is fuel oil. Even science fiction writers are not interested in this topic because there really is no development prospects. There is not even a clear definition - what is Development? I believe that this is something stable, not dependent on oil! The Soviet project is not fashionable and its popularization does not meet the momentary interests of the liberal cattle. Only a communist society can survive in that world, and this idea needs to be developed.
      1. kalibr
        kalibr 8 September 2018 13: 18
        0
        The collective farm is finished, no new thing is needed!
        1. aybolyt678
          aybolyt678 9 September 2018 19: 34
          +2
          Quote: kalibr
          The collective farm is finished, no new thing is needed!

          in place of the once prosperous and not very collective farms, there is now a bazaar where the main sellers of transnational corporations, the main military and economic adversary, sell products of their collective farms ... and this is good ??????
      2. Mustached Kok
        Mustached Kok 17 September 2018 23: 45
        0
        Well, first of all - "... when the oil runs out" is not a trick, this is not an explosion, this is not an accident. Oil HERE SO IMMEDIATELY AND AT THE SAME TIME AND EVERYWHERE it cannot end. As soon as there are GUARANTEED prerequisites that there will be no GUARANTEED oil soon, large states will begin to switch to alternative fuels. The most important thing is that factories and factories work. They can work on gas, coal, garbage, gas from garbage, fuel from garbage, water (meaning hydroelectric power plants), on several types of constant winds, on two types of solar power plants, on the geological activity of the earth - after all, large factories and industries consume VERY a lot of oil products. The most difficult thing will be for motorists ... in the CIS, Africa and some Asian countries. Many developed countries in Europe have a developed bicycle culture (which only helps health care). There is also an established network of urban transport in which only buses and taxis consume fuel, and the former can be replaced with electric counterparts (In the megalopolises of China, the vast majority of city buses are electric). Aviation will really become difficult, there jet engines are Tied to high-quality and "strong" fuel. Here we will either start using alternatives (trains and airships), or develop new types of fuels and engines for them.
        The world back in the 90s began to think about the fact that oil will end sooner or later, and gradually we move away from the oil needle. And although oil is still important, at the local level of individual countries or their regions. shown - that you can live without oil)
    3. 4eburasha
      4eburasha 14 September 2018 21: 19
      0
      I almost completely agree with you, I have the same impression of the article.
  20. Semen1972
    Semen1972 6 September 2018 17: 38
    +1
    Quote: gorgo
    It is necessary to believe in God and all

    So go to the monastery, why do you need worldly life.
  21. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 6 September 2018 21: 04
    +2
    Didn't like the thought "poor south, rich north" This is absolutely not the case.
    Our land is rational, everything necessary for life is provided in nature. . In Russia, the climate is harsh, because there are many hydrocarbons, forests are energy reserves for many generations. There are no places in the country where you can do without capital, heated housing. Short warm period - the basis for the creation and storage of stocks of products for replenishment of energy
    In the subtropics, there are other requirements for housing, for nutrition. To live in this climate does not need high energy costs — it is in the environment. If you think about it, you can come to the conclusion that the reserves of the natural pantry in the north and in the south are sufficient for life. The point is completely different, namely, robbery in different types of robbery: a prosperous west is therefore prosperous because it manages the bowels of others, taking all the best for itself and dying of luxury. For everything that the West has done for centuries, it will pay: for slavery, for war, for deception, nature does not forgive the wounds inflicted on it. Instead of being jealous of the robbers, the peoples should arrange life in their country, a reasonable, optimal life. I recall an interview with a rebel from Libya, who explained that Gaddafi will spend his money and they get pennies. I wonder where now the bones of the rebels, gnawed by animals, are lying around or if you don’t want to return the life they lost. What is happening today with Russia cannot be called barbarism: life is taken out of the country along with the mad export of the national property. It's a shame when the media of the whole world pour mud on the Russian Federation, but this is true in the sense that if you do not respect yourself, then others will not be respected, as the authorities of the country act today, they do not respect the country: from the country for worthless candy wrappers what is supposed to ensure the livelihoods of future generations for millennia is exported, given to those who have been trying to destroy us for centuries, leaving the country with debts and unpaid salaries. In every war, the country lost its defenders, the best of the best, and most of the petty ones apparently survived. Probably today the country lacks the best, the elite of the nation, and not the elite of consumption and indefatigable greed.
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 6 September 2018 21: 17
      +1
      Quote: olimpiada15
      Probably today the country lacks the best, the elite of the nation, and not the elite of consumption and indefatigable greed.

      +++ I agree with everything, I especially liked the ending. It is scary to realize that the USSR defeated Hollywood. Thanks of course to the top. I would like to add that not all the elite that surfaced up sad
  22. EvilLion
    EvilLion 7 September 2018 09: 14
    +2
    It is strange to talk about Libya with a population of 6 million as some kind of pan-African leader.

    The problem is actually global and poorly recognized. Her only solution seems to be an increase in working age and childbearing age, plus, possibly, stimulating the birth of twins, from a medical point of view, this seems to be possible. An increase in the retirement age is, by the way, well suited for this, people retain economic independence longer, which means they will be ready to have children longer. Now in 45 there are few who want to give birth, because 20 years to grow later.

    Another factor, it is necessary to drive migrants to the 3 neck, now it turns out that the European population has been imposed additional. load, it is forced to work more to feed visitors. What kind of children are there. At the same time, energy is now expensive, all the places where you can scoop up oil almost with buckets, but you have already worked out the coals with a shovel, have already been worked out, it becomes more difficult to maintain the existing level of mechanization. Apparently, that’s why Russia is still not so bad, there are no migrants, the fuel is all there, even for sale.

    Again, without dumping the excess population, local governments will have to think about what to do with it, well, then either let the gandons give away for free or cut each other, but only so that the population does not grow at the expense of parasites.

    I do not consider it advisable to force women into the kitchen. Although this could be done by drastically reducing the consumption of all garbage like smartphones, less laziness is produced, fewer jobs are needed, it is easier to shut up everything with men, but then you will have to seriously increase social obligations to mothers. And the loss of women and public life is unacceptable.
  23. Normal ok
    Normal ok 7 September 2018 10: 31
    0
    The questions are serious. But, the answer is:
    To keep a normal family, you need to live in the countryside

    Does not stand up to any criticism.
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 8 September 2018 10: 39
      +2
      Quote: Normal ok
      Does not stand up to any criticism.

      still withstands. Living in the village you will not buy Chinese cabbage, French fries, etc. .....
  24. Tired
    Tired 7 September 2018 17: 29
    0
    The author named one solution to the demographic problem, but in reality there are two. The first one is what the author suggested: a departure into the past, into a traditional culture with the defeat of a woman in civil rights and the deprivation of her financial independence. But there is a second, well described by Efremov and the Strugatsky: public education of children. At the same time, the first option is slightly (due to the process of replacing working women) cheaper, at the initial stage, and more pleasant for many men (as it gives more power over a woman). And the second is much more profitable at the final stage (primarily because of the possibility of employment planning) and is more preferable for many women (due to the presence of this same financial and legal independence). But the second option requires a more perfect economy than capitalism, and this is its main problem.
  25. Varaga
    Varaga 7 September 2018 20: 22
    +3
    Unfortunately, the author is right.
    We have to state this more and more often.
  26. Nikolay R
    Nikolay R 7 September 2018 22: 39
    +1
    For some reason, the author blames one-sidedly. And although I agree that the policy of liberals leads to a decrease and self-destruction of the people, but this was laid back in 1920. Then the Red-bellied were the first in the world to lift the ban on abortion. In Europe, this came only after 40-50 years. In Russia at the moment, annually, according to data from various sources, from 600 thousand to several million abortions are done.
    And now the childbearing age of people born in the 90s came when there was a decline in fertility. And if they are not seriously encouraged to have many children, then perhaps someone reading this article will catch time when other nations will live on our land.
  27. ROBIN-SON
    ROBIN-SON 8 September 2018 09: 00
    +1
    Village in L.O. Before the coup there were 2 herds of private cattle. Branch of the farm with cowsheds. People had a job in the village. Club, feldsher center, school, post office. Now - the people are not engaged in farming, at best they plant potatoes. Fields are empty, the club was burned, the school closed, honey. no center, no mail.
  28. doka
    doka 8 September 2018 19: 16
    +1
    I am not a resident of Russia; demography is a problem not only of Russia but of other white peoples why Muslims here win the religious principles of polygamy, And it is not a matter of money that is not enough for a child, but a child or machine is a better machine in consumer ideology, Russia needs to change its immigration policy within the Russian world must be collected everywhere the Slavic ethos change the laws on citizenship radically, otherwise a larger ethnos will absorb a smaller one,
  29. M. Michelson
    M. Michelson 8 September 2018 20: 02
    -2
    What do we Russians care about this "white race"? Has she ever put a finger on her finger for us? Let them take care of her who has no more important things to do.
    Yes, perhaps the Russians in Russia have an ethnic crisis. But he has no relationship in the problems of the white West. No need to get us involved.
  30. gla172
    gla172 9 September 2018 07: 35
    0
    ....... it’s already clear .... a much larger part of Russians (and Russians) explicitly, consciously or implicitly, subconsciously seeks (or is ready) to assimilate (dissolve) in other ethnic groups, which will lead to a “humane” resolution of the issue - “there is no people, no problems” .......
    But there is a UN resolution where it is clearly stated that genocide is a crime (this resolution does not stipulate that for Russians there is an exception that they are allowed to take root and exterminate) .......
    And there are Russians who respect all nations without exception, including their own; Russians who believe that genocide even in the most “humane” forms is still genocide ....... this is the way ....
  31. realist
    realist 9 September 2018 21: 59
    0
    Well, as if nothing new, everything has long been known. why panic? that more children are needed, and so it is clear, but in order to contain money, we need money - but what about production? the world government is quietly bending its line and ours is bending with it, sadly, I feel sorry for the children .....
  32. whitesnow
    whitesnow 11 September 2018 07: 33
    0
    Hello illiterate fascists! White race, non-white race. But nothing that the races are only three? Caucasoid, Negroid and Mongoloid. And the Arabs who poured into the EU are the same Caucasians, like the bulk of the EU population?
    1. Roman Lisakovsky
      Roman Lisakovsky 13 September 2018 07: 29
      0
      Hooked them to his apartment
      1. whitesnow
        whitesnow 16 September 2018 16: 57
        0
        I don’t let everyone into my house, but as an educated person I distinguish a person from the Caucasian race from the Negroid.
        And I know who and why is lighting a racial bonfire.
  33. Begemot
    Begemot 11 September 2018 16: 03
    +1
    The village is dying out, like villages, small towns.
    It is difficult to disagree with this, the saddest thing is that this is a state policy, legalized and consistently implemented. Try to imagine Russia, whose population compactly lives in 15-20 urban agglomerations. This is with our then open spaces, where for 200-500 kilometers there will be no settlements, no towns, only desert lands. Dashing people, rejected by the new order and illegal migrants, who will be periodically (and unsuccessfully) driven by the security forces, will live in quietly in abandoned villages, and they will rob on the high road. Their raids will have to build walls around cities. From one city to another caravans will ply under the protection of troops, otherwise they will definitely not get there. The worst nightmare imaginable. It will be possible not to remember about any unity of the country. Deputies of all convocations, since 1992, bear full responsibility for this, because all legislation is aimed at the destruction of small producers and small settlements. Look at the Tax Code - how the budget of small MOs is formed - This is a real financial hospice, just to live out the last days. “They did not fit into the market,” because there is not enough money to buy deputies, and therefore there is no place for them in the future.
    Someday all current deputies will be cursed and anathematized.
    1. whitesnow
      whitesnow 16 September 2018 17: 01
      0
      And what other natural processes, besides urbanization, would you like to cancel?
      1. Begemot
        Begemot 17 September 2018 09: 36
        0
        travel around the world and realize that not all successful countries go through urbanization, so I do not consider this process to be natural. Concentration of production, consolidation of the sales market and the labor market - all this is only in the interests of capital, and not at all in the interests of people.
  34. Signore Tomato
    Signore Tomato 11 September 2018 20: 40
    0
    Quote: ancestors from the Don
    take the Far East, 50-70 years will pass and

    Funny people, they are so funny.
    My grandmother, who was repressed in the 30s, returned home in the 50s. So in the early 90s she talked about the "evil Chinese Buratin" who are about to seize the entire Far East. This horror story has very, very long roots.
    By the way, skakly were also puppy dead much earlier than Peter the Great. Read at least Alexei Tolstoy, Stoll.
  35. Sergey Goncharov
    Sergey Goncharov 11 September 2018 23: 41
    0
    In fact, when a certain critical population density is reached in the habitat, the breeding rates of mammals begin to drop - until the breeding stops almost completely (females simply refuse to mate en masse). + it is known that the birth rate of our species inversely proportional quality of life. So: urbanization + growth in the quality of life = depopulation. By the way, it's funny that the increase in the proportion of homosexual sexual contacts with the growth of population density is also not some specific feature of "homo sapiens". In short, "tolerance" and other "multiculturalism" are a consequence (although a "aggravating" effect), not a cause. hi