Powerful and dangerous. Typhoon-K armed with Cornet

33
At the International Army-2018 international forum held in Kubinka near Moscow, the Russian Defense Ministry demonstrated the Typhoon-K armored car with the Kornet-EM anti-tank missile system installed, the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry reports.

Powerful and dangerous. Typhoon-K armed with Cornet




Compared with the "Tiger", also previously equipped with a similar complex, "Typhoon K-53949" is a heavier machine. The curb weight of the armored vehicle reaches 14 000 kg, and the full -16 000 kg. Machine length - 6760 mm. Width -2550 mm. Height -2840 mm. Ground clearance - 433 mm. Installed diesel six-cylinder engine power 350 hp Maximum speed on the highway - 105 km / h. Power reserve up to 850 km. Capacity - 10 people

The two-axle armored car has powerful armor protection capable of withstanding bullets from a Kalashnikov assault rifle or SVD sniper rifle. The claimed protection against various mines and land mines is very high, the armored car can successfully survive the 6 kg of TNT explosion under the bottom and any wheel.

Long-range multi-purpose missile system "Cornet-EM" has a long range (up to 10000 m) and high armor penetration (1300 mm). It has high noise immunity and can simultaneously fire two targets at once.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    1 September 2018 12: 02
    Capacity - 10 people
    And for what 10 people shove into the anti-tank missile system?
    1. +10
      1 September 2018 12: 07
      To have time for the colormet to derban the destroyed target.
    2. +4
      1 September 2018 12: 25
      Well, not always, he will be an anti-tank complex, will serve his own, then go fishing as a friendly company. A boat with a motor will fit exactly.
    3. +2
      1 September 2018 12: 41
      Quote: Nikolai Nikolayevich
      And for what 10 people shove into the anti-tank missile system?
      Well, probably dismiss tanks. request
    4. 0
      1 September 2018 12: 45
      Quote: Nikolai Nikolaevich
      And for what 10 people shove into the anti-tank missile system?

      This Typhoon K differs from the previous car, but probably still have not figured out the performance characteristics of what machine corresponds.
      1. +1
        1 September 2018 14: 20
        Quote: marshes
        Quote: Nikolai Nikolaevich
        And for what 10 people shove into the anti-tank missile system?

        This Typhoon K differs from the previous car, but probably still have not figured out the performance characteristics of what machine corresponds.

        All this is done in order to show us, who are interested in the state of the army as such and its armaments, that military-technical thought is not asleep, that things are going fine. But in fact, there is a banal dispersion of forces and means. On what, I beg your pardon, a vegetable, do we need such an abundance of various equipment with close performance characteristics? And so that the suppliers and repairmen are obscured by this variety. The only logical explanation for this sounds from the lips of a Ukrainian - but Schaub Bulo! All! There is no other explanation, and never will be.
        1. +2
          1 September 2018 14: 45
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          All this is done in order to show us, who are interested in the state of the army as such and its weapons,

          Strange you have the Ukrainian flag.
          At the expense of the state of the Russian Army, at the moment the most combat-ready army in the world, in the short term will pull everyone, a proactive solution to problems and attempts to consolidate.

          And at the expense of the diversity of scientific thought, it’s good, everything will be decided by now. By the way, we don’t have Typhoon K class cars, I won’t be surprised that we will organize assembly in the near future, because KAMAZ has assembly shops and a powerful lobby. The whole Army is with us in Kamaz, and even with an armored cabin, which is now a rarity for the Russian army.
          1. -2
            1 September 2018 19: 31
            Speaking of booking vehicles, so stamp (in the literal sense) standard measurements of armored vehicles with a backrest and put them on existing vehicles, especially those serving military equipment. Protects the driver and riders from explosions and shelling. inexpensive little thing, but it will save more than one life ...
            1. +1
              1 September 2018 19: 33
              Quote: Vladimir 5
              Speaking of booking a car,

              The main thing is the correct booking.
        2. +4
          1 September 2018 14: 52
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          There is no other explanation, and never will be.

          It is unfortunate that other thoughts do not occur to you. A wide variety of recently presented weapons models are not for the RF Armed Forces .. well, that is, not everything .. something will be purchased, but the main goal is to sell their products abroad. There is nothing wrong with that .. even good.
          1. 0
            3 September 2018 08: 11
            [quote = dvina71] [quote = Krasnoyarsk], but the main goal is to sell their products abroad. There is nothing wrong with that .. even good. [/ Quote]
            Rotten "excuse" in the style of explanations of the Darkest about the need for pension "reform".
    5. The comment was deleted.
  2. +3
    1 September 2018 12: 28
    6 kg of TNT under the wheel - solid. I wonder how much fuel it eats, 14 tons mass — 850 km driving range, 100 km — speed, how much fuel and how many liters fuel tanks
    1. +1
      1 September 2018 13: 38
      Quote: tatarin_ru
      6 kg of TNT under the wheel - solid. I wonder how much fuel it eats, 14 tons mass — 850 km driving range, 100 km — speed, how much fuel and how many liters fuel tanks

      Three fuel trucks are included ..
      1. 0
        2 September 2018 08: 56
        And the tractor in addition, pull out of the mud
    2. 0
      1 September 2018 14: 58
      Quote: tatarin_ru
      I wonder how much fuel eats

      It is considered easy .. Specific fuel consumption of 170gr / hp .. At maximum speed, the engine will use all the power .. ie 350X0.17: 1.05 = 57l .. the maximum possible.
      1. +2
        2 September 2018 00: 07
        Such an expense is characteristic of a low-speed marine diesel engine threshing in one mode, close to 100℅. For a high-speed automobile, and at variable loads, the figure 200 is closer, and not grams, but milliliters, these are different numbers.
        And the car engine rarely works in 100℅ mode, only on vigorous acceleration or on hard off-road. When driving on a road at a constant speed, the load will be about 50 percent. That is why when car engines are remade into marine engines, they are noticeably de-energized, otherwise they do not last long in 100 долго modes.
        1. +1
          2 September 2018 09: 12
          Quote: rzzz
          This consumption is typical for a low-speed marine diesel

          In general, thanks for the error indicated .. The expense that I calculated should be multiplied by the density of diesel fuel ... 0.85 .. Total 57x0.85 = 48,5 liters.
          No, specific consumption is recorded in grams. Yandex to help you.
          170gr is the specific consumption of a modern TRANSPORT diesel .. it can even be 160gr / h.p. although it is the same for a marine diesel.
          YES .. 100% mode is rare, so I wrote "maximum possible". The real one will certainly be less.
          Ship's do not deform .. Forsage is an increase in power. On the contrary, they are forced to increase, increasing the maximum speed.
          HERE we watch the engine D11 marine and commercial
          http://www.klm-service.ru/klm-service-price-lists/242-volvo-penta-pricelist
          1. 0
            2 September 2018 16: 12
            We all made a mistake. Instead of sharing, you are multiplying. Although liters should be more than a kilogram. I - in place of counting in grams per kilowatt • hour, I count in grams per horse. If you take the numbers from large marine engines, then there is about 170 grams, but per kilowatt • hour, which in terms of horse gives numbers of the order of 125-130.
            As for deforming. Look at the well-known YaMZ-238. It has a standard capacity of 240 horses in a standard configuration for a car. But when the ship’s diesel-gear unit is assembled at its base, its power becomes 200. At 240 it will crumble nafig for a couple of seasons.
            1. 0
              2 September 2018 16: 36
              Quote: rzzz
              Look at the well-known YaMZ-238

              Well .. look .. YaMZ-238 with a turbine and cooler is already 340 forces .. emnip, but the same engine with separate cylinder head with a turbine and cooler 400 ..
              The truth is, what does it mean ... I gave you a link to the famous manufacturer Penta-Volvo ... there you can clearly see the commercial version and the marine version. And the speed is lower and the power of the commercial version.
              1. 0
                4 September 2018 00: 41
                YaMZ is also a very well-known manufacturer, in terms of volume, as it were, not comparable to Volvo.
                Penta is a yacht engine. There, not everyone winds up 200 hours per season (I know, I worked). A yacht with more than 5000 hours on the counter is selling very tightly on the secondary is considered "tired". Naturally, with such operation, you can also spin up the motor. In the industrial version, this is the same motor, but deformed for the sake of a resource. Ship options, by the way, are different. I had a D12-800 yacht, a friend's on a small steamer (in fact, also a yacht of one major official, they are not supposed to have yachts, that's why they call it that) cost D12-540. Outwardly, they differ only in nameplates.
  3. 0
    1 September 2018 12: 45
    And how can a Kornet missile be aimed at a target at its maximum range? Is there a drone in the kit? ??
    1. 0
      1 September 2018 15: 25
      Quote: ANCIENT
      And how to direct the missile to the "Cornet" at the target at its maximum range? ...

      hi ... Using a mixed channel system (optical, thermal):
      “Cornet-EM” is capable of hitting modern and promising tanks equipped with dynamic protection, lightly armored vehicles, fortifications, surface and air targets (UAVs, helicopters) at ranges up to 10 m. In terms of cost-effectiveness ratio, “Cornet-EM” is significantly superior air defense systems of a similar line of action.
      On the base of "Tiger" on video recourse
    2. 0
      2 September 2018 09: 00
      And here, 10 messengers in the cockpit come in handy, they will send tanks to look in different directions smile
  4. +1
    1 September 2018 12: 49
    Well, this one is more adapted to "life", but the demand will be a competitor to Oshkosh, and the price will be "pleasant".
  5. +1
    1 September 2018 12: 51
    Why sculpt another car if the tigers cope with this task normally request or again “colossal export potential”?
    1. +1
      1 September 2018 13: 00
      Quote: Proton
      Why sculpt another car if the tigers cope with this task normally, or again, “colossal export potential”?

      The Tigers do not have such a mine-explosive defense like Typhoon K. Here, on the news, they plan to bring up to 2 kg and then the car is already ready. Moreover, PT mines from 4.5-12 kg in TNT go and quick-mounted HE mines are usually 122-152,155 mm shells, in the course and there explosives from 8 kg.
    2. 0
      1 September 2018 14: 59
      Quote: Proton
      Why make another car?

      In the world there are not many manufacturers of machines with such performance characteristics .. you need to occupy your niche ..
  6. +5
    1 September 2018 13: 17
    By the way, Typhoon K also has a competitor in the form of Ural-53099.
  7. +2
    1 September 2018 15: 59
    More and more in the army there are samples of equipment on a wheeled chassis, why would it ..............
    1. 0
      1 September 2018 16: 24
      Tracked chassis more expensive.
  8. 0
    2 September 2018 10: 23
    Soon cardans in the army will steer, you say not?
  9. 0
    2 September 2018 10: 44
    yeah, I agree with the opinion that they’re trying to get some crap. What tanks were going to fight on this armored car would be first told? In nominal conditions, you need a good-looking armored personnel carrier with good protection and that's all ... All these armored cuttlefish, especially with anti-tank thieves - are nonsense and cut
  10. 0
    2 September 2018 12: 15
    In my opinion, an armored car should have an automatic machine gun of at least 12,7 mm or a grenade launcher, or better, both. And "Cornet" is already like the cherry on the cake.