Military Review

With carbine in hand. M1 Carbine (part of 1)

37
Always advocated that it is necessary to write about what you know well. Or what I read about in different sources (the more there are not, the better!), Or about what you have been doing for a long time, that is, in fact, you get a second (third) higher education.


For example, Tanks... I made the first model in 1980 and then made them for 10 years, then I began to write and publish my own magazine about them, then the first books went, which were reviewed by good experts, and so - 38 years. It’s clear that I won’t get a tank. But as for them stories and the technology itself, I know them well.

Rifle arms, so to speak, given less, only six years, since the first articles about him appeared in my 2012 year. But if a person is given a diploma in the second higher education in three years of study in the Armed Forces with a first education that already exists, then six years seem to be enough? However, I can say that in theory - yes, but in practice it is advisable to hold onto each sample yourself, feel its weight, convenience - “application”, disassemble - assemble. Ideally, also to shoot from it, but in Russia it is an inaccessible luxury for the vast majority of authors. That is why I am especially happy when my friend, who collects various small arms, calls me and informs me that another sample is waiting for me in order to “hold on” for him.

This time the M1 carbine was such a model. By the way, this is not a cheap pleasure to buy even a hollowed such a carbine, made during the war years in the United States. Not so long ago, the price for it was 29 thousand rubles, whereas today it has grown to 85 thousand!


Carabin M1. Left and right view.

To begin with, it tells us about this weapon Wikipedia. “Oh, Wikipedia, someone wrinkles their nose, but ... British courts accept British Wikipedia as a source of information. And where does our country protect its interests in international affairs? In the British courts! Well, and since we live by the law (in any case, we try to live like this!), Then in this case we will stick to its installations and, except for proven cases of information distortion (we emphasize - proven!), We will try to use it. Well, the following is written in it: in the domestic literature, M1 Carbine is sometimes mistakenly called “baby Garand” or “Garand carbine”, but there are no such names in American sources.


The M1 carabiner in the section showing the device of its mechanism.

And then comes the information that in 1938, the US Army realized for the first time that it needed to re-equip its “second-line” servicemen (that is, tank crews, gunners, and signalmen, who already have to carry heavy coils on themselves with wires, in a word, all those soldiers who were not equipped with an army rifle), replacing self-loading pistols with a more effective lightweight carbine in their arsenal. The reasons were very solid: it is easier to train people to shoot from a carbine than from a pistol, the effectiveness of a carbine when shooting is lower, and the total cost of equipping the “second line with such” weapons!

With carbine in hand. M1 Carbine (part of 1)

Scheme of the M1 carbine.


Graphic diagram with the name of all parts in English.

Next, we turn to another source, namely the book by Larry L. Ruta, “War! US Caliber .30 Carbine, Vol. 1., Which contains information that complements the wiki that the development program for such weapons began on October 1, 1940, when the US Army Ammunition Division issued a five-page request for possible projects. The main requirements for the rifle were no more than 5 pounds of weight (with a magazine with ammunition), effective firing range of 300 yards and both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. The carbines were supposed to use the .30 Carbine cartridge developed by Winchester based on the .32WSL cartridge. By the way, what were these cartridges? Cartridges for automatic rifle M1905, which was proposed for use with cartridges .32 Winchester Self-Loading (WSL) and .35 Winchester Self-Loading. .32 WSL cartridge had a bullet caliber 8,2 mm and a sleeve length 31 mm. The bullet weighed 11 g and had an initial velocity of about 420 m / s. Bullet energy was 960 J. Ammunition .35 The WSL had a 8,9-mm bullet in 12 g, but a shorter cartridge length of 29,3 mm. The initial speed of his bullet was 425 m / s, and its energy was 1050 J. Its overall dimensions were Winchester Self-Loading (Winchester self-loading) ammunition markedly different from other cartridges of those years, which was done specifically to prevent their use in other rifles and damage weapons. That is, it was impossible to confuse them with anything.


Model late release with tide on the barrel for a bayonet. Such carbines began to be produced from 1944 year.


Tide for bayonet and front sight with a fence.

However, in the new carbine, it was decided to use other cartridges. The decision to develop them was also taken on October 1 1940, at a meeting of representatives of the US Defense Committee and commercial weapons companies. That is, simultaneously with the beginning of the development of a new carbine.


Strap brace.

Winchester identified the new cartridge as .30 SR M-1, using the .32 WSL as the basis. Already by the beginning of December 1940, the first experimental batch of new cartridges was prepared; they had bullets in a tompak shell filled with lead of 6,9 g. Then in January and June two batches of cartridges each of 50 000 were tested, and in the fall an additional batch of 300 was released 000 cartridges in which another brand of gunpowder was used.


.30 Carbine cartridge (7,62 × 33 mm).


The .30 Carbine cartridge (left) and .30-06 from the Springfield rifle (right).

After all these tests, 30 October 1941, the .30 Carbine cartridge (7,62 × 33 mm) finally entered service with the US Army and received the designation Carbine Cal. .30 M-1. The creator of the patron was David Marshall Williams, who managed to achieve good results. So, the initial bullet speed of this cartridge was 607 m / s, and its energy in joules was equal to 1308 J, with a mass in 7,1 g. Moreover, even after being adopted, the cartridge continued to be improved by the company and subsequently. So, in April, 1942, she replaced the brand of gunpowder in it, thanks to which the initial speed of the bullet increased by 10%. He also became the main developer of the carbine, and he formulated the main ideas embodied in its design ... serving a sentence in prison for murder of the second degree. After his release, he took a job at Winchester and presented his sample in collaboration with other designers. Williams even honored that MGM made a feature film about him, where his role was played by James Stewart. In fairness it should be said that the M1 carbine was not a completely unique weapon. In many ways, it was created thanks to the creative processing of the preceding samples.

The fact is that Winchester first commissioned Jonathan "Ed" Browning - brother of the famous designer John Moses Browning, but he died in May 1939, and it was then that the company attracted to this work David Marshal Williams, who suggested using gas engine with a short stroke, promised to facilitate the whole structure. 1940 tests of the year have shown that the Browning construction, based on the misalignment of the bolt, turns out to be unreliable when contaminated. As a result, it was reworked to use a rotating shutter in the style of a Garand rifle, and a short gas piston.


Shop, shop button and fire interpreter.

It was planned that the tests of submitted samples will begin in just 4 months, that is, February 1 of the year 1941. But since it all boiled down to the development of a new cartridge, which needed to be brought to mind, the tests delayed until May 1941. By this time, as many as nine rifles were ready, so the commission had plenty to choose from and what to compare with. Two samples were rejected right away - Mr. Simpson from the Springfield Arsenal, because his carbine weighed 6 pounds 10 ounces, which was considered too heavy to waste time considering it. The variant for the .276 cartridge was rejected, as it does not meet the requirements for the caliber.


The shutter is closed. The locking unit of the shutter is clearly visible, thanks to which it is rotated when the slide wound moves. At the base of the reloading handle, the shutter delay button in the rear position is visible.


The shutter is open and delayed. The store feeder and the shutter are clearly visible.

The rest of the samples were thoroughly tested, until the military stopped at the model of the Winchester company, which presented David Marshall Williams' lightweight carbine with a gas engine.


Receiver. Well visible grooves for lugs left and right.


Close-up shutter. Well visible lugs and extractor.

In May, the M1941 carbine prototype 1 dropped the weight from 4,3 kg to 3,4 kg, and then it became even lighter. Well, in the end, the carbine presented for the competition compared to the Garand rifle looked just elegant, it was short and easy to use, and also turned out to be very light - just some 2,6 ... 2,8 kg with cartridges - that is, even lighter than most submachine guns of this time. That is, his designer managed to fully satisfy the requirements of the customer and create a weapon that fully meets his requirements, but this does not happen often! It is clear that this was a weapon for certain conditions and certain people, but within the framework of these conditions it fully complied with the requirements set for him then.


15 charging shop.


15-charging store close-up.


The position of the cartridges before serving with the shutter open.

To be continued ...
Author:
37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Maki Avellevich
    Maki Avellevich 8 September 2018 07: 25
    +9
    Not long ago there was an article.
    but for this carabiner I will write again.

    excellent weapon for infantry, weight, ease of use. story.
    unfortunately they can be met with less and less. we only remained in the civil defense and in the police a little.
    rare device.
  2. Snail N9
    Snail N9 8 September 2018 07: 48
    +11
    Great weapon. In the same "Saving a Private ...." the convenience of its use in urban combat is well shown and .... its disadvantage in hand-to-hand combat is too easy to use as a club and the fact that the first serial carbines lacked a bayonet-knife (later this was fixed by adopting the M4 bayonet).
  3. san4es
    san4es 8 September 2018 08: 16
    +3
    After all these tests, on October 30, 1941, the .30 Carbine cartridge (7,62 × 33 mm) finally entered service with the U.S. Army and received the designation Carbine Cal. .30 M-1
    ... the Browning design, based on a skewed shutter, is unreliable when dirty. As a result, it was redesigned to use a rotating shutter in the style of a Garand rifle, and a short gas piston.
    1. Saxahorse
      Saxahorse 9 September 2018 17: 04
      +1
      Thank! And where does he throw the sleeve? It seemed to me that left up. This is the case?
      1. san4es
        san4es 9 September 2018 17: 43
        0
        Quote: Saxahorse
        Thank! And where does he throw the sleeve? It seemed to me that left up. This is the case?

        hi .... Apparently, right-up (see the bottom video) ... Yes, and the extractor on the shutter (photo), on the right the sleeve catches.
  4. air wolf
    air wolf 8 September 2018 08: 57
    +3
    In fact, the M1 is a pistol with an increased cartridge and barrel, and there are many such crafts in the wild west, and the Nazis made their assault - this is a breakthrough, even our SCS breakthrough, I read that we studied this M1 during the development of SCS, but did not accept ideas from there, took more from SVT. And all bourgeois weapons are very complex, small details, they lick everything, so it’s more expensive, but military weapons are actually and almost almost a one-time item with a small resource, so I think that our weapons school is the best!
    1. 2329 Carpenter
      2329 Carpenter 9 September 2018 04: 11
      +1
      Well... recourse in the same ShtG - where are there small details? Or in FG42? FN FAL, offhand ... So you can bet. Although ... 50/50 somewhere there will be a result.
      drinks
      1. 2329 Carpenter
        2329 Carpenter 9 September 2018 04: 26
        +2
        Quote: Kot_Kuzya
        The weapon is excellent, just breakthrough, especially in the version with the ability to conduct automatic weapons and 30-charge stores. It is a cut above the effective range of fire submachine guns, even PPSh and PPS, while it is lighter than them. But the design of the bullet was unsuccessful, it was necessary to make a pointed bullet for such a cartridge, and not an animated one, like pistol cartridges. But with ammunition with a pointed bullet, I think it would be not much inferior in effectiveness to the AK and STG-44.

        Is it really just a pool? Patrons, that ours, that the fascist-were more powerful. The American in the intermediate class at that time was the weakest. The speed of the bullet quickly gave up, I don’t remember the parameters now ...
        They wanted to revive the effectiveness of the goal against the background of low speed at combat distances. But in the end, they lost in penetration of barriers, as well as in general in power.
        And so, briefly ... And in general, as a constant command link / gunners / drivers / landing = a good thing.
  5. Kot_Kuzya
    Kot_Kuzya 8 September 2018 10: 23
    +1
    The weapon is excellent, just breakthrough, especially in the version with the ability to conduct automatic weapons and 30-charge stores. It is a cut above the effective range of fire submachine guns, even PPSh and PPS, while it is lighter than them. But the design of the bullet was unsuccessful, it was necessary to make a pointed bullet for such a cartridge, and not an animated one, like pistol cartridges. But with ammunition with a pointed bullet, I think it would be not much inferior in effectiveness to the AK and STG-44.
    1. Horse, people and soul
      Horse, people and soul 8 September 2018 12: 43
      +1
      In "normal" rifles, at a shooting distance of up to 200 meters, the penetrating action of a pointed bullet is accompanied by a water hammer, which would not have been the case with a relatively slow pointed bullet of a carbine. That's why they made it "pistol".
    2. Tank hard
      Tank hard 27 September 2018 18: 36
      0
      Quote: Kot_Kuzya
      The weapon is great, just breakthrough,

      And what, in fact, is a breakthrough?
  6. Curious
    Curious 8 September 2018 15: 34
    +4
    ",,, the tests were delayed until May 1941. By this time, as many as nine rifles were ready, so the commission had plenty to choose from and what to compare with."
    For the tests that began on May 8, 1941 at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, 25 (!) Corporations and individuals submitted their samples. Among the corporations are such monsters as The Auto-Ordnance Corporation, Colt's Patent Fire Arms Manufacturing Company, Hi Standard Manufacturing Company, Johnson Automatics, Marlin Firearms,
    JD Peterson, Remington Arms Company, Savage Arms Company, Smith & Wesson, Winchester Repeating Arms Company
    And there were even more samples of weapons, since The Auto-Ordnance Corporation, for example, presented as many as three samples, one of which was based on the famous "Tommy-gun"
    1. Curious
      Curious 8 September 2018 15: 45
      +3

      Another contestant is an experimental 0,30 caliber carbine manufactured by Hillberg.
  7. Horse, people and soul
    Horse, people and soul 8 September 2018 16: 49
    +1
    In our area, ammunition for this carbine is rare. Although the Czechs produce them.

    If it were not for the rim of .357 Magnum, it would be possible to reassign.

    From such a trunk .357 Magnum is quite in demand for "small" hunting for marmots and other small animals.

    Here, Ruger 77/357 series, five rounds in the store, stainless steel. A semiautomatic device in such a caliber based on the M1 carbine would be just a fairy tale. But the damn rim does not allow the use of a regular store.

    1. 2329 Carpenter
      2329 Carpenter 9 September 2018 04: 35
      0
      Yoho!
      Nine fast groundhog millimeters!
      Where is humanity? am
      He is enough for 5,6 marmots of his eyes ...
      1. Saxahorse
        Saxahorse 9 September 2018 17: 10
        0
        5.6? Eeee .. Are you talking about 5.56x45? And then you can find the remains of the groundhog?
        1. Cherry Nine
          Cherry Nine 9 September 2018 18: 03
          +1
          Quote: Saxahorse
          5.6? Eeee .. Are you talking about 5.56x45?

          .22 Long Rifle, most likely.
  8. Horse, people and soul
    Horse, people and soul 8 September 2018 17: 52
    0
    As the movie son of the protagonist in the film "Mummy 3" said, the future belongs to the Soviet teaching staff.

    This is if you ask "what would you choose" in 1943 from the MP-38/40, M1 carbine, Tommigan, PPSh and PPS-43.

    Yes

    1. aws4
      aws4 8 September 2018 22: 41
      0
      PPS lost in mass and accuracy and firing range single .. I didn’t shoot from the wrong one, so I can’t say with certainty that I would choose but PPS was very praised ... the carbine is without a doubt very interesting and no doubt good judging by the technical characteristics
      1. Horse, people and soul
        Horse, people and soul 8 September 2018 22: 53
        +3
        As if with faculty, few thought to shoot solo. It is not intended for this, but a platoon of soldiers with PPS, I think, would have given a platoon of enemy soldiers with carbines at the same effective shooting distance.

        They’d just crush it with fire. Especially during military operations such as stripping in the city.
        1. Cherry Nine
          Cherry Nine 9 September 2018 10: 34
          -2
          Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
          but a platoon of soldiers with PPS, I think, would have given a platoon of enemy soldiers with carbines at the same effective shooting distance.

          Have you definitely read the article?
          This carabiner is a PDW. Of modern analogues, the FN P90 is closest.
          The assault groups had tommigans. You can argue for a long time about their strengths and weaknesses regarding PPS / PPSh, but at that time they were quite convincing.
          1. Michael HORNET
            Michael HORNET 9 September 2018 12: 45
            +1
            Exactly. This is the second PDW (the first is the Mauser K-96 / Mauser 712), but much more successful. Yes, I didn’t have the mind to make it even better, but then many obvious things still did not understand.
            The cartridge is not "intermediate" and was not intended for this, namely the cartridge for PDV. By immediately using the correct bullet for him (at least as in 7,62x39 - 7,9 g with BC = 0.3, or even better - a 6,5 mm bullet with BC = 0.4) and squeezing the muzzle of the sleeve, turning it into a bottle - it would have turned out very good cartridge for PDV, which would have survived to this day
            1. Cherry Nine
              Cherry Nine 9 September 2018 15: 29
              +1
              Quote: Michael HORNET
              it would make a very good cartridge for MPE, which would survive to this day

              The Americans went to the intermediate cartridge from two sides - through a reinforced pistol .30 Carbine, and through a weakened rifle .276 Pedersen. Unfortunately for the Americans, the ground forces at that time mainly disposed of rams, which rested with all four hooves. As a result, the American intermediate cartridge immediately became a low-pulse, but 20 years later, when they had already broken it a couple of times.
            2. Horse, people and soul
              Horse, people and soul 10 September 2018 11: 06
              0
              And what PPP is not PDW for you? After all, they were supplied with tankers, because of the small size and purpose, it was to shoot when leaving a wrecked tank. And the difference in weight between the faculty and the M1 carbine will not be so big if the M1 carbine is with a 30-round magazine.

              hi
              1. Cherry Nine
                Cherry Nine 10 September 2018 15: 51
                0
                Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
                And what PPP is not PDW for you?

                The fact that the energy of the bullet of the cartridge 7,62 × 25 mm is pistol, 2-3 times less than the carbine. And it is not accidentally called a "submachine gun".

                Another thing is that this is an empty scholasticism. As a PDV, a gun (Stechkin), and PP, and a carbine, and a shortened machine gun (M4, AKS74) can be used. There is more positioning, sorry my French.
            3. Horse, people and soul
              Horse, people and soul 10 September 2018 11: 19
              0
              Not in between?

              Yes, if we consider the purpose of the intermediate cartridge to confidently reach the enemy 300-400 meters, which the PP could not.

              Here is the ballistic table for .30 carbine
              https://www.sellier-bellot.cz/en/products/rifle-ammunition/rifle-ammunitions-fmj/detail/147/

              Here is the ballistic table for .223 Remington
              https://www.sellier-bellot.cz/en/products/rifle-ammunition/rifle-ammunitions-fmj/detail/180

              Here is the ballistic table for 5,45x39
              http://www.barnaulpatron.ru/production/sportshuntingcartridgesshooting/545.39.html

              Moreover, for 5,45x39, according to various sources, 1300-1400 Joules at 1300 Joules for .30 carbine.

              True, out of these 1300 Joules, a carbine bullet quickly loses energy on each next hundred meters because of its shape. This cartridge for close range combat, but a real intermediate cartridge, still has to work at 300-400 meters.
              1. Cherry Nine
                Cherry Nine 10 September 2018 16: 48
                0
                Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
                Not in between?

                Yes, if we consider the purpose of the intermediate cartridge to confidently reach the enemy 300-400 meters, which the PP could not.

                Everything is complicated here, in fact.
                1. There is no doubt that .30 could be the first intermediate cartridge if the Yankees could put it into a tommigan (the tommigg tried with a .30 cartridge, and with an even more powerful .351 WSL, a complete analogue of 7,62x39, but with a blunt end bullet). It is believed that the weight and automation scheme of Tommigan allowed this to be done.
                2. In reality, it turned out to be an analogue of SCS, which (SCS) was quite a weapon on an intermediate cartridge.
                3. However, the SCS was part of the weapons complex on the intermediate cartridge SKS - AK - RPD at the platoon-squad level. The M1 Carbine drove all the way to a completely different company - with the M1 Garand and M1918 BAR, cartridge .30-06. Against the background of a very powerful rifle cartridge, both the range and flatness of the carbine looked frankly inadequate and greatly complicated the battle of the squad built around the machine gun. That is, it could be intermediate if the Americans didn’t have RP-46 and ABC-36, conditionally.

                So he remained in the history of some strange garbage (although not without pluses), and not the AK-47.
            4. gross kaput
              gross kaput 20 September 2018 20: 13
              -1
              Quote: Michael HORNET
              using immediately the right bullet for it (at least in 7,62x39 - 7,9 g with BK = 0.3, and even better - a 6,5 mm bullet with BK = 0.4) and squeezing the sleeve of the sleeve, turning it into a bottle, it would have turned out very good cartridge for MPE, which would have survived to this day

              Yes, knowing the history of American riflemen is not your strong point. I suggest reading about this Winchester .224 Light Weight Military Rifle device - this is just about trying to turn a .30 carbine into a bottle with an animated bullet.
    2. 2329 Carpenter
      2329 Carpenter 9 September 2018 04: 39
      0
      The second most common PP in the Wehrmacht and SS was PCA. Thanks to a competent pricing policy and discount system.
      1. 2329 Carpenter
        2329 Carpenter 9 September 2018 04: 57
        0
        It has long been a dream to get such a wife.
        No offense to the men who fought with him, but there is a persistent feeling that this weapon is more suitable for women.
        Easy, graceful, minuscule return ...
        No wonder he immediately spouse (on U-Tube), and most of all he liked ...
        1. Tank hard
          Tank hard 27 September 2018 18: 33
          0
          Quote: Carpenter 2329

          Light, elegant, minuscule return

          PPSh ?! recourse
          1. 2329 Carpenter
            2329 Carpenter 27 September 2018 21: 43
            0
            Joke? (Lung...)
            1. Tank hard
              Tank hard 28 September 2018 21: 05
              0
              Quote: Carpenter 2329
              0
              Joke? (Lung...)

              0
              The second most common PP in the Wehrmacht and SS was PCA. Thanks to a competent pricing policy and discount system.
              It has long been a dream to get such a wife.
              No offense to the men who fought with him, but there is a persistent feeling that this weapon is more suitable for women.
              Easy, graceful, minuscule return.

              Is this about PCA?
              1. 2329 Carpenter
                2329 Carpenter 29 September 2018 10: 13
                0
                Nah ... somehow it’s not so understood ...
                This is not about 5,5 kg in female hands. This is about 2,5.
                I wrote in a separate post. In the general context of a branch.
                hi
                1. Tank hard
                  Tank hard 29 September 2018 21: 35
                  0
                  Quote: Carpenter 2329
                  0
                  Nah ... somehow it’s not so understood ...
                  This is not about 5,5 kg in female hands. This is about 2,5.
                  I wrote in a separate post. In the general context of a branch

                  So I don’t understand ... And what did you write about?
  9. Saxahorse
    Saxahorse 9 September 2018 17: 15
    0
    Thank you for the article. A small American carbine is quite interesting and there are not many good reviews on it.
  10. VictorZhivilov
    VictorZhivilov 23 October 2018 22: 37
    0
    serving a sentence in prison for second degree murder.

    Explain in detail who is familiar with criminal law, what does this mean?

    Anyone familiar with the language of Shakespeare can recommend this book:
    http://www.brucecanfield.com/m1-new.html