Heading the ratings: why Putin is wildly popular in the world?

151
Both domestic and foreign publications have repeatedly called the Russian president one of the most influential politicians in the world, which is due, first of all, to his ability to conduct a competent domestic and foreign policy, and not to give in to any provocations from outside.

On the eve of the Austrian edition of Der Standard published an article in which the main reasons why Vladimir Putin is very popular in the West are mentioned. The first is the politician's support for traditional values, in particular, ideas about family and masculinity. The publication notes that amid the all-embracing chaos in which other leaders plunge the world, Putin’s desire to restore order looks much more expedient and correct.





The next point, which is captivating the public, is the tough stance of the Russian president regarding the so-called hegemony of the Western elite in various fields. If, for example, the United States, along with other countries, decided to legalize same-sex marriages, then why engage in the promotion of all this?

Approximately the same situation is with the dictates of the dollar, on which the USA has planted the whole world. According to Austrian publicists, Vladimir Putin does not support the domination of green currency on the world market, which is why Russia and its partners are planning to switch to national currencies, as well as cryptocurrency.

And finally, the newspaper focuses on the personal qualities of the Russian politician:
"A very likeable person who possesses self-irony and is witty, but at the same time modest."



Arguing about Putin’s public image and recalling his photos from fishing, journalists note that he appears before the public as a “seasoned tourist and athlete”.

It is worth noting that Austria is among the European countries that are building a constructive and friendly dialogue with Russia. While the western establishment speaks with partners in the language of sanctions, our country offers mutually beneficial cooperation, which cannot but be bought.
  • Oleg Orlov
  • https://image.ibb.co/c8AeyU/1499683760.jpg
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

151 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    31 August 2018 10: 05
    But you definitely don’t need iPhones!
    1. -12
      31 August 2018 10: 06
      I have the same opinion, Putin is well done.
      1. +12
        31 August 2018 10: 08
        Quote: maxim947
        But you definitely don’t need iPhones!

        Want to buy? Take it for nothing.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +15
          31 August 2018 10: 32
          It is worth noting that Austria is among the European countries that are building a constructive and friendly dialogue with Russia.
          Well, I see, because at first I got the impression that the article was written by the EP ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. AUL
        +15
        31 August 2018 10: 14
        I don’t know how it is in “the whole world”, but in his country he has not enjoyed “wild popularity” for a long time. All these screams of popularity come only from in-house claqueurs.
        PS And, if you take a picture with a spinning rod, you would learn, at least, to hold it correctly! And it’s even embarrassing to watch.
        1. +4
          31 August 2018 11: 26
          Quote from AUL
          I don’t know how it is in “the whole world”, but in his country he has not enjoyed “wild popularity” for a long time. All these screams of popularity come only from in-house claqueurs.
          PS And, if you take a picture with a spinning rod, you would learn, at least, to hold it correctly! And it’s even embarrassing to watch.


          Have you read the article? In it, there is not a word about "frenzied" popularity at all ... You would have overlooked it. And then your comment is really quite awkward.
        2. +17
          31 August 2018 11: 27
          Quote from AUL
          I do not know how it is in the "whole world", but in my own country he has long been already "wildly popular" does not enjoy. All these screams of popularity come from in-house claqueurs.

          I don’t know how about "a long time ago", but after the election, to the great disappointment of the Russians, he left the teddy bear government in the localities with practically the same composition, increased VAT from 18 to 20% and supported the increase in the retirement age, unambiguously crackled. Undoubtedly, he is very popular over the hill. challenged the United States and strongly questioned their leading position, which no one had dared to do before him, thanks to which everyone saw that the "king is naked" and, moreover, is the main bandit in the world. If he announced his intention to raise the age on the eve of the March 18 elections, then the voter would have a choice and regardless of whether he won or not, he would retain his face, but he essentially threw those who voted for him, considering him as a guarantor. His explanation of the need to raise the age was clearly not convincing, and the proposed "goodies" in the form of reducing the term of working for women from 8 to 5 years and maintaining the existing benefits (for a transitional period!) Are generally ridiculous. It will never be possible to return the rating to the level of 82-86% support. Now the people have a great opportunity to say, "Volodya, you are wrong," for which it is necessary to go to the polling stations on September 9 and vote against the candidates from the "Eat Russia" party throughout the country.
          1. +12
            31 August 2018 11: 43
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            why do you need to go to polling stations on September 9 and vote against the candidates from the Eating Russia party across the country?

            Only to the surprise of the entire population of the country, EP will win again by a wide margin ..
            1. -6
              31 August 2018 14: 29
              Do you declare this on behalf of the entire population? Not too much self-confidence?))
          2. 0
            31 August 2018 22: 07
            it is necessary to go to polling stations on September 9 and vote against the candidates from the Eating Russia party throughout the country.
            Vote for whom? All voices will be spread out in other parties. I will be for the Communist Party, she has the highest rating in online voting.
            1. +1
              1 September 2018 16: 22
              Quote: StWahmister
              Vote for whom? All voices will be spread out in other parties. I will be for the Communist Party, she has the highest rating in online voting.

              For them dear ones))) This is their legacy in the form of retirement age at 55 and 60 years old today want to dismantle. The next step of "Edra" will be the abolition of the 8-hour working day, which was also established by the communists.
          3. +1
            1 September 2018 19: 30
            We already had one "dearly beloved in the West" president ... now he is not cursed only by the young people who grew up already under Yeltsin ... GDP has reached this stage in its ranking ... Our beloved ... thank you. .. justified ...
        3. +11
          31 August 2018 11: 35
          And if you take a picture with a spinning rod, you would learn, at least, to hold it correctly!

          Well, well, from now on in more detail.
          The coil is closed.
          Leg between forefinger and middle finger.
          Or (not visible in the photo)
          The reel is open, the leg is between the middle and the index, the fishing line is pressed by the index.
          What's wrong?
          1. +3
            31 August 2018 14: 36
            Quote: bk316
            Well, well, from now on in more detail.
            The coil is closed.
            Leg between forefinger and middle finger.
            Or (not visible in the photo)
            The reel is open, the leg is between the middle and the index, the fishing line is pressed by the index.
            What's wrong?

            Not the fisherman! It would be time for this fisherman to think about where to find money for retirement without raising the retirement age, and how to increase the birth rate of the dying population (under his 18 year rule!), So that there would be more workers per pensioner. What is he doing instead ?? He left the old people without pensions, and with a clear conscience he fishes fish, enjoying an idyll with nature!
            1. +7
              31 August 2018 16: 46
              Not the fisherman!

              Well, and why is it blah blah, I ASK A SPECIFIC QUESTION YES NOT FOR YOU.
              Will you be like this all the time?
      3. +27
        31 August 2018 10: 14
        GDP is a notable figure, this fact. How and where they belong to him ..... on the drum, it is important how he relates and what he does for our people, the country as a whole.
        1. +21
          31 August 2018 10: 18
          Quote: rocket757
          GDP is a notable figure, this fact. How and where they belong to him ..... on the drum, it is important how he relates and what he does for our people, the country as a whole.

          I agree! It is a fact! But it is impossible not to admit that with the protection of Medvedev and Kudrin on pension reform, he was very happy ... I don’t know, I personally did not expect this from him ...
          1. +12
            31 August 2018 10: 59
            Probably because I didn’t expect anything good, I didn’t get very upset .... here my half was out twice, although I warned her.
            Complacency - I never voted for them, although this does not change anything. They are, they are in power.
            We will break through, not the first time, but the nerve cells are not restored. as doctors say!
            1. 0
              31 August 2018 12: 28
              I never voted for them, although this does not change anything.

              Cool Victor.
              I also did not expect and did not count on retirement. My first comment on this topic about 3 years ago.
              And also not upset. And always voted for GDP. laughing
              And I completely agree with you
              Break through, not the first time
              1. +4
                31 August 2018 14: 22
                Do not expect and do not count, it is useful!
                I don’t trust oblenergo - there is a generator and a solar power station, Gazprom - gas cylinders in reserve and a gas generator on firewood, coal (gas and firewood in reserve), a water utility - there is a well and a system for complete water purification, salt, crackers and an armchair by itself! Not a bunker, but a basement with a primitive, but air filtration system. You can’t stock up on everything, but I can stretch out for a long time! While it turned out to sit without gas, electricity and centralized water for about 4 days ... an accident in the power grid !!!
                And let them call me paranoid! Ha ha ha
                For retirement, of course, a poverty alarms come in handy, we don’t live in subsistence farming, we still need cash!
                We will be healthy, we will not die! We protect our health, our own and loved ones! soldier
                1. +1
                  31 August 2018 14: 54
                  Again with the pros garbage, glitch .... I can’t put the cons!
                  1. +4
                    31 August 2018 16: 48
                    Again with the pluses of garbage

                    Yes, God bless them with pluses. I build exactly as you have done. bully
                    1. +1
                      31 August 2018 20: 56
                      My favorite club "Crazy Hands" did everything myself except the generator and gas boiler.
                      projects on electrical, heating and water supply, consulted on profile sites .... it was just interesting, then it became useful!
                      I say, let’s break through, we won’t stay without work!
                      The idea of ​​a fix is ​​to lay down a fireplace, nice, beautiful, efficient! soldier
          2. +9
            31 August 2018 11: 36
            Eugene hi As soon as the GDP contacts the whitewashing of the government liberties led by DAM, there is a terrible howl about the fact that he merged everything, etc. Maybe he’d better not idealize them, ask harder? And it turns out somehow like that ... negative
          3. +1
            31 August 2018 22: 10
            on pension reform, he made a big deal ... I don’t know, I personally did not expect this from him ...
            Since 2004, I have not expected anything good from him ... negative
        2. +7
          31 August 2018 12: 26
          And what does he do for OUR people? For his, yes, he does a lot. One bridge to Sakhalin is worth ...
      4. +11
        31 August 2018 10: 41
        Quote: maxim947
        I have the same opinion, Putin is well done.

        Of course well done, with the principle - beat your own, so that strangers are afraid. (although maybe I'm wrong, what we, the people of Russia, are his own)
      5. +16
        31 August 2018 10: 43
        Yes, Putin’s policy with the IMF is in agreement, that’s where they praise ... well done .. you need to crush the people of Russia .. paid medicine, take away pensions, let the old people start working from the age of 50 .. and don’t find, let them die .. More and more Putin Yeltsin began to me to remind, Yeltsin was also very praised wassat
        1. +8
          31 August 2018 11: 46
          it is quite possible if you remember who launched it for the first time))
      6. +17
        31 August 2018 10: 50
        Quote: maxim947
        I have the same opinion, Putin is well done.

        The most important thing is for Putin to enjoy "wild" popularity in his country! And the wild popularity in the world means absolutely nothing. Gorbachev was wildly popular fellow in the global community, so what?
        1. +2
          31 August 2018 18: 39
          I doubt that our pride Peter the First and Catherine were "wildly" popular in their own country.
      7. +21
        31 August 2018 11: 16
        And when the West praised Nabiullina, Nemtsov, Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Solzhenitsyn and others, are these also all wonderful people who have done a lot for the country? The West and Dudaev was a hero. But for some reason Kadyrov is not praised. For some reason, Stalin and Ivan the Terrible are also not praised. Why?
        1. +10
          31 August 2018 11: 33
          Quote: Mr Credo
          And when the West praised Nabiullina, Nemtsov, Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Solzhenitsyn and others, are these also all wonderful people who have done a lot for the country? The West and Dudaev was a hero. But for some reason Kadyrov is not praised. For some reason, Stalin and Ivan the Terrible are also not praised. Why?

          Yes, because the West wants to see GDP STILL more their own. And we, the people of Russia, are definitely our own. And GDP with the team took a position almost in the middle, with a slight bias towards the West. Those. in the first place he put exclusively his interests and his friends. And the hierarchy of his interests is as follows: 1st place - his own and his friends.
          2 place- Western interests
          3rd place - the people of Russia (what remains)
          Therefore, raking criticism from two sides. And he will not change anything. It swings harder towards the West, will faster cause dissatisfaction and turmoil in the country, will sway toward the interests of Russia, will cause a toughening of the reaction of the West, up to the weaning of personal capital from the entire top. This is how it will balance, as long as there is an opportunity, because its interests come first. Acrobat, damn it. Is it clear now?
        2. +10
          31 August 2018 11: 50
          Quote: Mister Creed
          But for some reason Kadyrov is not praised. For some reason, Stalin and Ivan the Terrible are also not praised. Why?

          Confucius answered your question (rhetorically natural).
          What can be said about a man if the whole village loves him?
          “This is a worthless man,” Confucius answered.
          - And what about the man whom the whole village hates?
          “And this is a worthless person,” Confucius said.
          - It would be much better if good people from this village loved him, the bad ones hated it. hi
          1. -1
            31 August 2018 12: 11
            What can be said about a man if the whole village loves him?
            “This is a worthless man,” Confucius answered.
            - And what about the man whom the whole village hates?
            “And this is a worthless person,” Confucius said.
            “It would be much better if good people from this village loved him, and bad people hated him.”


            An absurd statement does not refer to a worthless person at all, for such a person does not cause emotions, however, the sage Confucius was too clever. wassat
            1. 0
              31 August 2018 12: 29
              Quote: krops777
              An absurd statement does not refer to a worthless person at all

              Dear, blame it on the difficulty of translating the word "worthless". hi
    2. +8
      31 August 2018 10: 08
      Quote: Theodore
      But you definitely don’t need iPhones!

      We need fresh blood
      1. +16
        31 August 2018 10: 33
        Heading the ratings: why Putin is wildly popular in the world?
        duck people there are probably better, not like us, Putin was not lucky with the people ...
      2. +4
        31 August 2018 11: 00
        Also an option, but essentially nothing will change.
    3. +10
      31 August 2018 11: 11
      so take this tourist to your place in Austria.
      and his friends too.
      let athleticism improve there.
    4. +13
      31 August 2018 11: 21
      Only inside our own country we get continuous nasty things from his government ... As "Cockroach" writes in its publications .. not a guarantor, but a hydrant ..
  2. +6
    31 August 2018 10: 11
    The road to him in Austria. Since they love him. There he is definitely needed
    1. +6
      31 August 2018 10: 49
      Quote: Peter Smith
      The road to him in Austria. Since they love him. There he is definitely needed

      and for his place, you offer your candidacy?
      1. +5
        31 August 2018 11: 19
        and for his place, you offer your candidacy?

        in developed, democratic societies this is the case - candidates are proposed, and the most worthy (or wise) is chosen from them. Recall Churchill - the British drove him in the elections after the war, elected another and live satisfying and happy, but you have no irreplaceable ones, before the funeral.
        1. +14
          31 August 2018 11: 30
          in developed, democratic societies

          That is, in the states, the topic is still being procrastinated that the Kremlin appointed them to Trump ...
      2. +9
        31 August 2018 11: 26
        Quote: Masya Masya
        Quote: Peter Smith
        The road to him in Austria. Since they love him. There he is definitely needed

        and for his place, you offer your candidacy?

        Well, yes, for many it’s not replaceable .. an ingenious multi-guide ..
        1. +4
          31 August 2018 11: 28
          I do not see any offers, Putin will throw off whom you put ???
          1. +10
            31 August 2018 12: 09
            Quote: Masya Masya
            I do not see any offers, Putin will throw off whom you put ???

            Grudinin, Zyuganov, in extreme cases, there will still be no worse .. But in general, there will be no Putin, there will be many candidates, they are not, because the field for the sun is cleared
            1. +6
              31 August 2018 12: 15
              it won’t be worse anyway ..

              Are you sure? And if not better ... what's the point?
              1. -2
                31 August 2018 12: 34
                Are you sure? And if not better ... what's the point?

                Good afternoon.
                Yes, you are an optimist.
                If you put Zyu on the president of the country will not be in 5 years.
                1. +4
                  31 August 2018 13: 00
                  love
                  Yes, you are an optimist.

                  And the optimist and the realist ... wink no one will plant Zyu, and he’s so well and not so badly fed ... he moved Grudinin instead ... wink
                2. +5
                  31 August 2018 14: 52
                  Quote: bk316
                  If you put Zyu on the president of the country will not be in 5 years.

                  If there are no oligarchs, this does not mean that there will be no country. Everything will be exactly the opposite - the country will finally breathe in full breasts the life-giving air cleansed of various liberal molds.
                  1. +1
                    31 August 2018 16: 55
                    If there are no oligarchs

                    And where does the oligarchs? It’s good to pour slogans, isn’t it yourself disgusting?
                    Zyu will ruin the country primarily because he is a classic hired clown - a sparring partner.
                    If the memory is short, then he already had the opportunity (2 times at the very least) to take the highest power in the country, he dismissed it in a panic. What do you think he will do if he is offered her a third time? Obviously, he will immediately palm off on another. I am sure the CIA understands this and will palm off their own (since such an operation has already been implemented in the USSR)
                    The second Zyu always in fact supported the oligarchs, only these oligarchs in general with troubled pasts.
                    And the third Sue, how many years will be in 5 years? Brezhnev in comparison, just a young man will be.
            2. -6
              31 August 2018 12: 32
              Grudinin, Zyuganov,

              And I am SURE 100% will be worse.
              I can easily justify
              Is it necessary? Or do you always like drum logic and facts?
              1. +10
                31 August 2018 13: 41
                The enemies of the Communists do not justify, but lie, slander, and the hypocrite. And all for the sake of profit for their vile purposes.
                1. +1
                  31 August 2018 16: 57
                  Catch the rationale (just above)
                  Although I am not an enemy of the Communists.
                  I just don’t like slush like Zyu, and he got nasty on the Communists.
                  Grudinin notice quietly merged - dog number 2?
              2. -1
                31 August 2018 16: 27
                So Putin will now live forever or what? How did we live without him and will live without him? What should we do when Putin passes away?
            3. 0
              31 August 2018 19: 53
              Quote: Svarog
              . In general, there will be no Putin, there will be many candidates,

              That is, the Khokhlyat variant. Yes you, dear, crest !? Confess. smile
      3. -4
        31 August 2018 11: 28
        Why your candidacy? We have many candidates for successful people included in the Forbes magazine. Can I choose from them? They themselves rose from the dirt to riches, which means they will raise the country! Or do not raise? What we shall do?
        1. +7
          31 August 2018 12: 05
          Throw out this whole list, all this is an old rake, on the account of which crippled fates, broken noses and foreheads. Still have suggestions? Or all the air came out.
          1. -1
            31 August 2018 12: 36
            Throw out this whole list, all this is an old rake, on the account of which crippled fates, broken noses and foreheads.

            AND..? Stalin smashed a few foreheads? Or Peter the first. Or ANY OF THE GREAT GOVERNORS?
            Soft-heartedness and magnanimity are not a plus, but a terrible minus in politics.
            My ONE claim to GDP is softness.
            1. -1
              31 August 2018 12: 41
              "And ..?" Do not put those listed by you on a par with these.
              Leave as is hi
          2. -1
            31 August 2018 16: 32
            The question was, who besides Putin? I replied. When Putin dies, will we also have to follow him? After all, no one except Putin! Or are there other options? Or will life end after him and Russia will die?
            1. +5
              31 August 2018 16: 47
              "Mister Creed"

              Yes, there they are, to take the same governor of the Tula region, specially in the prime of life, they pulled out of the army so that they would gain experience, and army dust would fly off (in a good sense of the word).
              1. 0
                31 August 2018 16: 56
                So I also think that there is!
            2. +5
              31 August 2018 17: 03
              When Putin dies, will we also have to follow him?

              When the GDP leaves office (not even from life), he will name a successor and choose a successor with a result from 55% to 90% (depending on who he calls)
              Do you want to bet?
      4. +2
        31 August 2018 15: 13
        Quote: Leshy1975
        Quote: Altona
        Quote: General of the Sand Quarries
        There are Crimea and Donbass. But Kiev, Russia why?

        ------------------
        And why is Russia a hotbed of Nazi infection near by? Stalin was not in vain taking Berlin.

        Assad is alive and well, only the territory of Syria is divided. And Assad is simply hiding with the umbrella of our bases.

        I will not express my opinion a lot, I think dear Altona (Eugene) will agree. The task of restoring the territory of historical Russia is the primary task of ANY head of state with this name, albeit in different variations. And Kiev is a Russian city, and our population! And who will object and put pressure on the uselessness of Ukrainians, Belarusians, as well as other peoples (I mean the opinion of the population, not the "elites") who consider Russia their home, that is the primary enemy of Russia (both the state and the people, often precisely the hidden ). And this is the surest sign of such an enemy. Only together we are strong. Separately, Ukraine, Belarus, as well as the current Russian Federation, would have withstood such a war as in 1812, or VO. Definitely NO. That's all the justification for the need or uselessness of a large single country, in case we certainly do not want to be dissolved in the Western world. Because, in this case, yes, you need to further split up and dissolve in parts.

        Task dignified life of citizens и population increase Russia is the primary task of ANY head of state with that name, albeit in different variations. And most important to us are Russian towns, and our population! And who will mind and put pressure on need the accession of Ukrainians, Belarusians, as well as other peoples (I mean the opinion of the population, not the "elites"), not counting Russia with his home, that is the first enemy of Russia (both the state and the people, often hidden). And this is the surest sign of such an enemy.
  3. +18
    31 August 2018 10: 12
    Well, for 18 years now, instead of creating industry and a powerful economy like China, it has been trading in energy resources .. Naturally, Europe will respect it for this - there is no competition, there is gas
    1. +2
      31 August 2018 11: 21
      there is no competition, there is gas
      + price goes down + scarecrow for hobbits of all sorts of small, some pluses
    2. +7
      31 August 2018 11: 27
      Quote: spektr9
      Well, for 18 years now, instead of creating industry and a powerful economy like China, it has been trading in energy resources .. Naturally, Europe will respect it for this - there is no competition, there is gas

      Liked your comment .. subtly noticed hi
      1. +4
        31 August 2018 11: 59
        You can't smear "thinly" on bread, you can't drink balm for your soul, but GDP is respected through clenched teeth. In order not to relax, a strap is thrown over their skull and jaw by an American friend, everything is dosed. Only we can love it in Russian - passionately.
  4. +13
    31 August 2018 10: 16
    Let the world take it for himself. Together with the whole company
    1. +10
      31 August 2018 11: 50
      but without funds pulled out of the country.
  5. +4
    31 August 2018 10: 16
    I think there is a subtle play of the propaganda machine in the west - the "enemy" should be in sight constantly and constantly attract attention. If you write only bad things, then over time it simply "bores" and people stop being interested in a person ... like: well, a scoundrel, so what? well, everyone knows about this, well, he did something else bad, he is a scoundrel in no other way ... "Therefore, an" attractive "," interesting "image of an enemy is created ... True, this is a" blown "image, on in fact, it has nothing to do with the original ... and the citizens of Russia themselves should not forget about it ... so as not to be disappointed, then ... wink
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. BAI
    +16
    31 August 2018 10: 21
    The smooth transformation in Gorbachev is wildly popular abroad and below the baseboard in the homeland.
    1. +6
      31 August 2018 10: 44
      I would not talk about the popularity of "below the plinth". Russia is full of stoned people who, even after the subject's speech about the pension reform, continue to "love" him, hope for him, pity (yes, "pity" him!) - like, here he is, unhappy ... then the disgusting boyars did not whisper in their ears, forced him to say all this through force, but he, in fact, thinks differently and he will still change, correct .... Even look at the comments here on VO. One, so in general, agreed to the point that with his timely pension reform the subject allegedly "outplayed the United States", ruined the plans of the "State Department" .... wow! No more no less! And you say: popularity is "below the baseboard" .... wherever there ... winked
      1. -2
        31 August 2018 11: 15
        as they say ... freedom is not nice to the slaves ... kind owner is nice to them ...
    2. +14
      31 August 2018 11: 22
      Quote: BAI
      The smooth transformation in Gorbachev is wildly popular abroad and below the baseboard in the homeland.

      The recipe for its popularity is very simple. Firstly, it came to power against the backdrop of EBN, did not dishonor the country drunk, frank nonsense, at first did not carry. In general, against the backdrop of EBN, gold, not the president.
      Secondly, "Talking about Putin's public image and recalling his photographs from fishing, journalists note that he appears before the public as a “seasoned tourist and athlete”.
      And I am a lot of popular people, not always politicians, of course, but I know. For example: Kim Kardashian, Monica Beluchi (here is a woman! Albeit aged), Brad Peet, Arnold Schwarzenegger (here is a politician) and many others. What is the source of their popularity? Mediaism. Those. A media personality is a person who attracts attention with his activities. But what kind of activity? What Kim Kardashian is known for, for example, is a topless photo, VVP is also constantly half-naked on vacation. Further, for example, the popular person: Pamela Anderson is actively involved in environmental issues. The actress also founded The Pamela Anderson Foundation for the protection of animals. GDP also drove with Siberian Cranes. (Of course, I think that there are enough scientific workers for this). A purely PR move. Next, Jackie Chan and similar actors. Well, VVP is no worse, in a kimono and with a black belt, the spitting image of an action hero. I dived behind amphoras to the bottom of the Black Sea (archaeologists could not cope without it themselves), flew on a fighter plane, caught fish, against the background of the harsh and beautiful northern nature, caught in front of the cameras (if only at the same time I also stoked the fire with bucks, in general, it would be 150%. Whoever thinks, it cannot be so, for explanations in the CEC). Some officials and oligarchs, for example Deripaska, scolded and decided their fates on camera (just like Sylvester Stallone - Judge Dreide), the fact that Deripaska still does not feel bad is not even the second question. But as on TV. looked! And so on. Oh yes cinema! Well, VVP starred in more than one film, so what if it's not fiction, genres are different. So the above examples of persons and GDP are based on the same popularity. Mediaism. No, this is of course all clear, if popularity was measured by success in economics, politics (failure in Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, most likely further in Belarus), then GDP would hardly be so popular. Well, he and his team don't, and create popularity with guaranteed methods. Otherwise, "What happened to Kursk? He drowned." You can't lift that much. This is the kind of GDP that we, and in the West too, generally know. Habitual stereotyped media coverage. What does all this have to do with acting as president? And not any, a popular recognizable person who does not blog, but holds the post of head of state. That's all the difference.
      1. +7
        31 August 2018 11: 30
        succinctly ... competently ... you ++++++ ...
  8. +6
    31 August 2018 10: 27
    Everything is so, only the passage about "competent domestic policy" made me tense.
    1. +3
      31 August 2018 11: 23
      need to relax and get

  9. +7
    31 August 2018 10: 38
    Quote: rocket757
    GDP is a notable figure, this fact.

    --------------------------------
    In 2012-2015, he was really very popular in the world and my "friend" on Facebook, Pelet Kabongo from Africa, constantly wrote me enthusiastic comments about Putin, he really liked him, I, due to "borderline" patriotism, had to support his enthusiasm, although he did not separate them especially. Now he writes to me less often. And the "successes" of Putin, the United States began to collapse with all the levers at their disposal. Objectively speaking, the leveling of his successes is due to the half-heartedness of his steps. There is Crimea, no Donbass, and even Kiev. There is a military operation in Syria, but there is no complete protection of Assad from the attackers. Many words about social protection and then it immediately turns into a robbery of the population. He has too strong the influence of the liberal wing, which apparently convinced him that there is no one in the world stronger than the United States and we need to bend our backs even lower, following the example of Poroshenko. This is the only way I can understand all of Putin's steps both inside and outside the country. Well, if Putin had been more decisive in 2011-2015, he could have done more. And now he is already a "leaving figure", an aging alpha male who is being gnawed by liberal beta males.
    1. +7
      31 August 2018 10: 56
      I here, too, wrote earlier that "one is not a warrior in the field," even though there is a small group of like-minded people up next to you. The subject did not create support for himself by creating a truly people's party or attracting some "people's" parties to his side, and this ultimately ruined him. Now, with his speech, he finally made his choice. And he was really tired.
    2. +2
      31 August 2018 11: 01
      There is Crimea, no Donbass


      There are Crimea and Donbass. But Kiev, Russia why?

      There is a military operation in Syria, but there is no complete protection of Assad from the attackers

      There is. Assad is alive and well, he wouldn’t have been protected, the barmalei would have spanked him a long time ago.

      A lot of words about social protection and then it immediately turns into a robbery of the population.

      To finally understand the situation in Russia over the past five years, a real war is going on against the country. This drains the resources, so you have to go for unpopular but forced measures. If the West would leave Russia alone, then in these five years it would not be recognizable, in a good way.

      if Putin was more determined in 2011-2015, then he could do more

      He already did the impossible, even a little more. Are you entitled to demand even more?
      1. +8
        31 August 2018 11: 15
        "Drains resources" .... "War"? How many billionaires were there before Putin? How many billionaires are there now? The war, you say, "sucked everything ...." wink
      2. +6
        31 August 2018 11: 17
        And "our" elite is fighting against us. It is she who sucks resources, not Washington.
        What specifically did Putin do during his reign?
        1. +8
          31 August 2018 11: 33
          right now the operas with boris55 will catch up ... then they’ll sort it all out for you ... wait ...
        2. +2
          31 August 2018 11: 39
          Of course I did nothing. He didn’t stretch the country from the wild 90s, he didn’t stop wars and conflicts on the territory of Russia, he didn’t restore production, he did nothing at all.
          And work, factories, salaries and everything else appeared at the behest of pike, fell from the sky))
          1. +11
            31 August 2018 12: 15
            And work, factories, salaries and everything else appeared at the behest of pike, fell from the sky
            Please tell me at least one large engineering company created from scratch under Putin? I want to know maybe there are such?
            1. -3
              31 August 2018 12: 47
              There is a site "made by us". Study))
            2. 0
              31 August 2018 13: 51
              Here, accidentally stumbled, the Ulyanovsk machine-tool plant was opened under Putin))
              1. +5
                31 August 2018 14: 58
                Here is an interesting article about Ulyanovsk "production" .... (moreover, production is really in "quotes"). wink
                https://ulpressa.ru/2017/09/05/aleksey-marahovets-kak-ispolzuyut-solnechnyie-paneli-v-ulyanovskom-dmg-mori/
                1. -1
                  31 August 2018 19: 55
                  Yeah, but in the 30s in the Soviet Union all production was raised and made by "Western partners". And shells during the war were made on many machines with the stigma of the Third Reich. Americans helped to do Dneproges.
                  So I see no reason for concern. The fact that you need to master their technology first, and then do your own thing, the 90s make themselves felt in terms of the collapse of production.
                  And we must not whine, as everything is bad, but do it.
              2. +3
                31 August 2018 15: 06
                Altona (Eugene) Today, 10: 38
                In 2012-2015, it was really very popular in the world.

                One cannot remain infinite popular indefinitely if real successes are not visible in the country to which this person directs! Since the real attitude to the authorities, citizens of the country cannot be hidden, and various events cannot be passed off as genuine successes, without evidence, the popularity inside and outside will undergo transformation.
                To sell goods with a rotten grain, they will beat in the end.
                GDP is still a significant figure, followed by a great country, great power, but this is not forever!
          2. -1
            31 August 2018 16: 48
            Factories that sell their products to Russia? High-speed trains began to produce it in Russia?
          3. -4
            31 August 2018 17: 18
            I’ve made a lot of goodasses to my neighbor, but once I had to make a remark about smoking on a common ground, I became the number one enemy. Yes, and hell ... he would have gotten it all with his gossip, he’ll definitely get to the tambourine ... I’m what it is for, Let’s soberly evaluate the president’s contribution to the fate of the country, and not by one pension reform. One cannot but admit that the standard of living nevertheless increased in comparison with previous periods before Putin, a lot of which were restored and built. And neither Zyuganov, nor Zhirinovsky, nor anyone else would have achieved the best results. Unless, of course, someone missed this period - thumped, for example, or played Forex or roulette, sat at the computer, etc., so these are his problems. Not everyone who achieved something under Putin is scammers and thieves, believe me. Do not be like my neighbor, do not.
          4. +3
            31 August 2018 19: 16
            What exactly? Without common words. Well, let's sort it out again.
            1. Oil prices have risen, there is more money in the country, something has been falling for us. So is Putin taxing? Only the ingenious Karnaukh succeeded, relying on the full power of the USSR. What is it? The hydrocarbon prices are managed by the USA - this is not a secret to anyone. So they probably need to say thanks?
            2. The most savvy gangsters realized that it is much more efficient (and safer!) To milk us legally (without quotes, because the laws are written for them). buried in frostbitten - you can go to the cemetery and look at these monuments. Is this also merit of Putin? What was he doing there himself in the 90s?
            3. Production has risen so much with it that even its own machine tool industry is gone. a screwdriver, where are we not going to count our fencing and cabinet enclosures? So - systematically and purposefully, production began to collapse precisely under Putin. And now they continue. Abbreviations at UVZ, the destruction of Khrunichev.
            So where are the plants, where are the wages? Rogozin cheated about the salary at the VMZ? And the factories on Sdunas and St. Petersburg Jew Satanist? So he is paid for the money EdRoidy.
    3. 0
      31 August 2018 19: 33
      Quote: Altona
      Speaking objectively, the leveling of his success is due to the halfness of his steps.

      Reasoning immature youth. Crimea was taken because of Sevastopol. And why do we need Kiev? Will you be doing it? The country has no time and money to restore Ukraine. But Donbass does not live near Kiev. And help always comes to him. And Assad is now, of course, in the mountain aazazdo greater danger than he was two years ago. laughing laughing What kind of nonsense?
      Quote: Altona
      And now he is already a "leaving figure", an aging alpha male who is being gnawed by liberal beta males.

      Alpha, beta ... Did you miss the biology lessons? So tomorrow they will call for the desk again. smile Be patient. GDP is not Akella, he does not chase deer. He pulls the country out of the cesspool. And quite successfully. And if you do not understand this, then this is a problem of your mind and education, and not its age.
      Quote: Altona
      And the "successes" of Putin, the United States began to collapse with all the levers at their disposal.

      It was especially funny to read. smile What successes have collapsed? Any examples? Or the main thing is crowing? smile
      1. -1
        31 August 2018 21: 20
        GDP is not an object of unconditional reverence; there is something to blame for the system of power, finally, and it as the personification of the highest with it!
        But even the high prices for our exported goods would not have saved us from a catastrophe if the sovereign power were .... the faces that were there before it. This is certainly not his only merit, the system (circle, rally, congress, club .... family) decided for everything, he became the highest from her, we saw him and many connected him with hope for the revival of POWER!
        It’s a contradiction, but unfortunately there are too many negative facts .... just changing the top, without fundamentally changing the system, will give you very LITTLE!
        Is it worth it to fence the garden before we can change the whole SYSTEM.
        The system is just a term designating our option - early stage capitalism with subordination of political structures to the club of the country's most influential / wealthy oligarchs!
        This symbiosis is a very heavy burden for the rest of the country's population.
        1. +2
          1 September 2018 00: 40
          Quote: rocket757
          Is it worth it to fence the garden before we can change the whole SYSTEM.

          smile The system ... And what we have now for the SYSTEM? And what should it be changed for? Do you have a recipe for perfect power? Share it. I do not promise the Nobel Prize, but I will treat you more carefully.
          1. 0
            1 September 2018 09: 59
            I just don't want to smear everything, because everything is described clearly, professionally ... it's not difficult to find a description and understand that we have capitalism, our rich people are stuck in the stage of primary accumulation of capital, although in reality all the most "tasty" has already been divided, such us political, economic ... system.
            I’m not an idealist, I don’t believe and I’m not looking for anything like that, there is none of him, most likely it cannot even be.
            I DO NOT OFFER anything right now, the society is not ready for that, therefore I do not believe that pseudo-revolutionary actions will lead to something good, because all these r-Evolutionaries are not trying for us, but only trying for themselves in power.
            Nothing better awaits us through their efforts, therefore, I propose, by joint efforts, to force the ACTING government to break away from their selfish interests and work for the country, for its citizens. This is a direct duty of "servants of the people" which they do not fulfill in any way!
            Not perfect, difficult, but nothing is impossible in this, if we TOGETHER TOGETHER!
            1. +2
              2 September 2018 13: 26
              Now more or less clear. I already thought that you are the same rEvolutionary. smile But still you are an idealist, no offense will be told to you. hi
              1. +1
                2 September 2018 16: 27
                Grew up, brought up in a country where idealism was almost a religion .... it is not without reason that many of our people care about everything in the world and they want the best for everyone at once!
                It doesn’t happen, but they didn’t explain it to us, they said that a little more, something else should be sacrificed!
                We have been raised this way, and we project our worldview on our descendants, and it happens on everyone around us.
                For me, this is not so bad, although annoying. Diodes of opposites did not get bigger, then the world is completely kayuk!
                Everything needs a reasonable balance.
  10. VB
    +10
    31 August 2018 10: 42
    "Putin does not fight any liberals or" West ", he is the West's henchman. If you add up all the latest news, this is an increase in the retirement age (even in the past it was included in the budget, and recently also Putin's decree on the reduction of transfers from the budget), increase in VAT, rejection of the mass purchase of Su-57 and "Armat", reduction of the military budget, closure of "Khrunichev", accelerated VAT refund to "a well-known group of people", gasoline, new "old" government, return of Kudrin, Kirienko star, compensation from the budget "Affected" oligarchs, a surplus budget, maintaining the cut-off point at $ 40 / barrel, etc. Then everything becomes clear. Putin understands that these 6 years are the last for him. And he either reached an agreement with the strongest group (liberal collaborators from the government (there are houses, bank accounts, children, study there, receive treatment there, rest there)) or wants to negotiate personal safety after retirement (he also threatens the Hague ), modeled on Yeltsin and the "family". And for this you need to merge RUSSIA. And most likely we should expect an attempt to come to an agreement with the "West". Further "reforms" on the recommendation of the IMF. The growth of social tension, the loss of confidence in the state and its institutions, the collapse of the economy, the degradation of the state is NOT THE CONSEQUENCE, BUT THE GOAL! Destroy a country that can physically destroy the "west" (and east) and appropriate its resources.
    I have never heard such a LIE and attempts to dump all the burdens on the people and remove them from the rich! Putin! Do you even NOW understand what you've done ?! Now you will only be trusted if you are overweight or oligophrenic! And your "United Russia" (which is not "united" at all and not "Russia" at all) will betray you at the first opportunity, as soon as it smells of gunpowder ... Now NOBODY WILL EVER BELIEVE you !!! This is the BEGINNING OF YOUR END !!! All ratings drawn, now even inveterate, masochists putinososov will drive off support from Putin, so that the guarantor of theft and poverty remains without the support of the people! And why support ???, for genocide, for theft, for plundering and utilization of the country? Putin is the guarantor of theft and the main liberal of all Russia! "
    1. 0
      1 September 2018 10: 03
      What does a liberal and someone else have to do with it! The world, the country, is ruled by "capital" - that is, owning everything and everyone!
      And in what kind of skin is it now, a liberal sheep or in the wolf skin of a dictator, what a difference FIG .... there are owners, there are nothing! That's the whole layout!
  11. 0
    31 August 2018 10: 42
    Well done, pulled the llama from the regiment ... he thinks everything about the country, for a small fraction ...
  12. Hey
    +9
    31 August 2018 10: 47
    The step of our president, after which I ceased to respect him, is that he, the son of the Leningraders of the blockades, signed a decree on the destruction of sanctions products. Let these products be distributed to the poor (even after examination), fed to cattle, transferred to menageries and shelters for cats and dogs, but not destroyed. And then...
    There is a good saying about superiors and for superiors.
    If you are bitter, you will pass, you will be sweet swam. So Putin’s inner circle swallowed. It turned out to be soft.
    1. +3
      31 August 2018 11: 25
      The step of our president, after which I ceased to respect him,
      Well, you swung for a long time))) on Echo of Moscow, as well as on some national-patriotic resources, citizens have long been)
      1. +1
        31 August 2018 17: 49
        And this is always so, until he touched his darling - for his homeland, for Putin. And as he himself was affected, so - and then for what. It surprises me how many people have flown over. Unpopular reforms have always been and will be, as there were and will be rich and poor. I have never treated Putin with special reverence, the president is in many ways not perfect, but still better than many, you can compare yourself. But I do not care about the pension reform, which also doesn’t really work for me (I might also like to cool off earlier in the country), to put it mildly, incorrectly. I foresee numerous attacks of opponents, I want to warn about correctness, since childhood I have not endured rudeness. Good day or night to everyone!
  13. +6
    31 August 2018 10: 50
    Quote: VB
    "Putin does not fight any liberals or" the West "; he is the West's henchman.

    ------------------------------
    Did I write that he was fighting with someone there? With liberals or soil workers. I write that in his environment there are those who influence him, and that the liberals have more arguments, such as there will be no money at all if we butt with the United States, and what you generals will live on. This is about this. And so he’s a protege of Yeltsin and that’s it.
    PS As for "support", I can't tell a foreigner that I don't support the leader of my country, that's why I wrote about "borderline" patriotism. That is, when dealing with a foreigner, there is no need to raise Russia's internal problems, and he is not interested in it. He is interested that "as he answered the United States, maaget is the same." That's all.
    1. +6
      31 August 2018 11: 27
      well ... he picked up his own environment, judo trainer Mr. Rottenberg what it costs + the whole KGB cooperative Lake. Chi liberals Chekists outwitted? They laughed at Baba Leroy in vain.
  14. +2
    31 August 2018 10: 54
    True is the folk wisdom: from love to hate is one step. Yesterday, enthusiastic praises were sung, and today they are ready to be mixed with waste products. This is me about GDP and commentators in.
    1. +10
      31 August 2018 11: 24
      what are all the same "bastards" these commentators IN ...
      he is to them "in a fatherly way" ... so to speak "with all his heart" ... with understanding ...
      Well, think about it once again fumbled in their pocket ... and they "whined" ... weathercocks and traitors ...
    2. +7
      31 August 2018 11: 28
      atu him !!! but he’s to blame for what he was eager for as president, as if he had been smeared with honey on galleys
    3. +5
      31 August 2018 11: 37
      Who sang, he will sing now, and adults are not inclined to enthusiasm.
      And what has lost respect - so it has already gone the fifth year, it is he who simply consolidates the lessons for those who are especially understanding.
  15. +2
    31 August 2018 11: 03
    Quote: General of the Sand Quarries
    There are Crimea and Donbass. But Kiev, Russia why?

    ------------------
    And why is Russia a hotbed of Nazi infection near by? Stalin was not in vain taking Berlin.

    Assad is alive and well, only the territory of Syria is divided. And Assad is simply hiding with the umbrella of our bases.
    1. -7
      31 August 2018 11: 33
      Stalin was not in vain taking Berlin.


      Your Stalin himself a decent boob, the bacilli, when it was possible to destroy, (the power was incredible!) Did not destroy
      https://www.yaplakal.com/forum7/topic1820149.html
    2. +7
      31 August 2018 11: 49
      Quote: Altona
      Quote: General of the Sand Quarries
      There are Crimea and Donbass. But Kiev, Russia why?

      ------------------
      And why is Russia a hotbed of Nazi infection near by? Stalin was not in vain taking Berlin.

      Assad is alive and well, only the territory of Syria is divided. And Assad is simply hiding with the umbrella of our bases.

      I will not express my opinion a lot, I think dear Altona (Eugene) will agree. The task of restoring the territory of historical Russia is the primary task of ANY head of state with this name, albeit in different variations. And Kiev is a Russian city, and our population! And who will object and put pressure on the uselessness of Ukrainians, Belarusians, as well as other peoples (I mean the opinion of the population, not the "elites") who consider Russia their home, that is the primary enemy of Russia (both the state and the people, often precisely the hidden ). And this is the surest sign of such an enemy. Only together we are strong. Separately, Ukraine, Belarus, as well as the current Russian Federation, would have withstood such a war as in 1812, or VO. Definitely NO. That's all the justification for the need or uselessness of a large single country, in case we certainly do not want to be dissolved in the Western world. Because, in this case, yes, you need to further split up and dissolve in parts.
  16. +3
    31 August 2018 11: 13
    What is so unusual about this? Unusually, he looks against the background of spineless amoeba at the helm of many states.
    A normal man in power. Economic. Tricky and smart. He is engaged in his country.
    Compare what was at the beginning of his presidential terms and what is now - two big differences. One must be proud of such a president!
    1. +2
      31 August 2018 19: 24
      This is about whom? About Lukashenko? Or about trump?
  17. -1
    31 August 2018 11: 15
    Quote: spektr9
    Well, for 18 years now, instead of creating industry and a powerful economy like China, it has been trading in energy resources .. Naturally, Europe will respect it for this - there is no competition, there is gas

    And you and your children are ready to go outside in a mask, because there the content of harmful substances exceeds the permissible tens or even hundreds of times? Ready to send your child to a carcinogenic environment to achieve a “powerful economy like China”? Do you think they threw off the means of production and the lower section of the technological chain for their beautiful narrow eyes? Or do you think they just mounted grids against suicides at the Foxcon factory? This economy did not come from the air and the price for it was not in money and exorbitant.
    Judging by your extremely naive statements, you are only ready to get a bribe for a flax on hot topics, drinking a seagull on the couch.
    1. +5
      31 August 2018 13: 20
      And you and your children are ready to go outside in a mask, because there the content of harmful substances exceeds the permissible tens or even hundreds of times?
      And my friend I live in Krasnoyarsk and for us this is the norm, as well as in other cities that feed and drink Moscow ...
      This economy did not come from the air and the price for it was not in money and exorbitant.
      And whoever ruined the same economy means you need to re-create it and if you are a Belarusian girl who is afraid of work, this does not mean that the country should suffer because of you
      Judging by your extremely naive statements, you are only ready to get a bribe for a flax on hot topics, drinking a seagull on the couch.

      Yes, and that tells me the bummer who is afraid of enterprises like fire, to whom give the alpine air a clean office and the opportunity to receive salary for sitting out pants
    2. +2
      31 August 2018 19: 33
      Is it adequate at all? We then all had to die in the USSR. From carcinogens.
  18. 0
    31 August 2018 11: 17
    Quote: shubin
    True is the folk wisdom: from love to hate is one step. Yesterday, enthusiastic praises were sung, and today they are ready to be mixed with waste products. This is me about GDP and commentators in.

    Given the realities of the Internet space and the popularity of the resource, there are a lot of paid commentators from all over, “agitators” of VO itself and any creature in a couple, in addition to people who really want to participate in the discussion, some of which are patriotic and rational.
    1. +8
      31 August 2018 11: 54
      Quote: Mentat
      there are plenty of paid commentators
      And they comment on these paid commentators exclusively maliciously, they beloved Mr. Putin in every possible way. And those who run in droves in crowds and under different nicknames show the same vocabulary and spelling, but exclusively in a loyal vein - they, of course, fight from sedition from morning to night at the call of their hearts!
  19. +5
    31 August 2018 11: 25
    is determined, first of all, by his ability to conduct a competent domestic and foreign policy
    Well - the external, there is more or less, but where did the author see his internal - not that literate, but at least some?
    Although if it is "more expedient", then of course ...
  20. +13
    31 August 2018 11: 40
    the ability to conduct competent domestic and foreign policies, as well as not succumb to any provocations from the outside.

    Literacy is simply off scale. The WTO, two wars, former allies and parts of a single country - enemies or will soon become them. 25 million jobs, retirement age and birth rate in the Caucasian regions, brain drain and migration from Central Asia, total corruption and non-accountability, "competent" financial policy.
  21. +6
    31 August 2018 11: 57
    when the partners praise it is nothing good. Mikhal Sergeyich, Boris Nikolayevich, now Vladimir Vladimirovich. So he is there too
  22. +1
    31 August 2018 12: 12
    Quote: Leshy1975
    I will not express my opinion much, I think dear Altona (Eugene) will agree. The task of restoring the territory of historical Russia is the primary task of ANY head of state with that name, albeit in different variations. But Kiev is a Russian city, and our population!

    ---------------------------
    Didn't I write about this in other comments? You pick up my archive of comments and there you will find confirmation of your words. I wrote just like you did. I wrote that Russia, as the legal successor of the USSR, has the right to all territories that have gone to the "union republics." This article proposes to assess Putin from the perspective of his foreign policy. As a bourgeois president, Mr. Putin works for a solid five, defends the interests of our monopolies in the foreign arena. As a tsar and guardian of the people, Mr. Putin is a solid failing student. We live in the paradigm "the tsar-people's defender and guardian of the state from the oppression of external and internal". Well, the tsar went out and introduced himself as a senior boyar. "The people, that is, my faithful servants, I brought you a verdict from the boyars that you have nothing to dream of indulgences and a penny for your old age, since our court requires pomp to support and boyars, as before, should shine in their mansions." Here, in brief, is his speech before us.
    1. 0
      31 August 2018 12: 21
      Quote: Altona
      Didn't I write about this in other comments? You pick up my archive of comments and there you will find confirmation of your words. I wrote just like you did. I wrote that Russia, as the legal successor of the USSR, has the right to all territories that have gone to the "union republics." This article proposes to assess Putin from the perspective of his foreign policy.

      They wrote, and we are looking at what is happening with the same ratings. This is just, I hope not unnecessary, a reminder (not to you personally, but to those who read and who finds success in GDP in foreign policy) than really should measure the success of the Russian president in foreign policy.
    2. +2
      31 August 2018 12: 36
      Quote: Altona
      I wrote that Russia, as the legal successor of the USSR, has the right to all territories that went into the "union republics" ...

      ... that is, as usual - you wrote nonsense. The Russian Federation did not and does not have any "right to all territories"; "legal succession" was limited (offhand) to the division of the USSR state debt, its property abroad and gold reserves. Everything Yes

      And, no matter how hard you get out here, this "succession" has nothing to do with anything else.
      1. +1
        31 August 2018 13: 46
        And the "legal succession" of the enemies of the Communists who seized Russia was also in the fact that, on the orders of their Western masters from the Paris Club, they forgave other countries $ 150 billion, which they owed to the Soviet Union.
  23. -1
    31 August 2018 12: 22
    Quote: Leshy1975
    Media. No, of course it’s all clear

    ---------------------------
    You correctly wrote about media coverage, but media coverage in brutal photos is only part of the established image. Decisive action in Georgia and initially in Syria became the basis of his international popularity (read every word, and do not pull what I write out of context). I saw this when I went to Facebook groups dedicated to Putin, yes, this is how these groups were created by foreigners, and Americans wrote in them. We cannot demand from foreigners class consciousness, Soviet education and knowledge of Russia in all aspects. Therefore, just as television serves to foreigners about Putin's policy in the world, so they perceive it. And Putin at that time was not silent, there were many words about "sovereign democracy", about "national bonds", about "adherence to traditional values." This is exactly what the foreigners reacted to.
    1. -2
      31 August 2018 12: 36
      Quote: Altona
      Quote: Leshy1975
      Media. No, of course it’s all clear

      ---------------------------
      You correctly wrote about media coverage, but media coverage in brutal photos is only part of the established image. Decisive action in Georgia and initially in Syria became the basis of his international popularity (read every word, and do not pull what I write out of context). I saw this when I went to Facebook groups dedicated to Putin, yes, this is how these groups were created by foreigners, and Americans wrote in them. We cannot demand from foreigners class consciousness, Soviet education and knowledge of Russia in all aspects. Therefore, just as television serves to foreigners about Putin's policy in the world, so they perceive it. And Putin at that time was not silent, there were many words about "sovereign democracy", about "national bonds", about "adherence to traditional values." This is exactly what the foreigners reacted to.

      Dear Altona (Eugene), well, I do not see any reason at all for our discussion and clarification of certain nuances. Because we may not agree on the nuances, but on the whole we evaluate the picture equally. hi
    2. +1
      31 August 2018 20: 04
      I'll wedge here. With 888, everything is vague. As with Syria. 888 is very different from the Donbass? For me it’s the opposite. And the reaction is very different. What does this mean?

      Well - Zvhvrchenko was killed! The nosed blonde will perform and express something there.

      Syria. I won’t believe in any philanthropic intentions in foreign policy, and even from the oligarchs. ISIS to water directly in their toilet? So if there are no prerequisites for them in the Russian Federation, then they do not represent a danger to us. We have our own Asia close by. And the Caucasus. And in general there is Tuva, which is confidently raking in the direction of China. Testing technology? Which one? Soviet? Gaining experience by fighters? In terms of CTO, i.e. preparation for internal conflict? It also doesn’t work.
      Since oligarchs rule us, the oligarchs probably have some kind of interest. Which one?
  24. +2
    31 August 2018 12: 22
    The first is the politician's support for traditional values, in particular, ideas about the family and masculinity.

    A good family man is divorced and unmarried. Putin's "masculinity" lies in the fact that for 2,5 months he cowardly blamed on his subordinates the responsibility for yet another robbery by the government of the people.
  25. +3
    31 August 2018 12: 26
    I can't say anything about the world. In Russia, after justifying the robbery of pensioners and protecting "socially responsible businessmen", what kind of popularity can there be?
  26. +4
    31 August 2018 12: 33
    Quote: VB
    Such a LIE and attempts to blame all the burdens on the people and remove them from the rich, I have not heard! Putin! Do you even NOW understand what you have done ?!

    ------------------------------
    Understand correctly that his domestic and foreign policies are INSOVERABLE! In foreign policy, he promotes the interests of the oil and gas and raw materials sectors (I can't even write "Russian", because these are offshore companies). And if in foreign policy it (the oil and gas sector) is given a little bit of a kick (sanctions, restrictions on lending, in the supply of equipment), then it immediately rolls back into domestic policy - "the pension system will collapse", "we want to strengthen our reserves" and other nonsense about our aspirations. It is not necessary to separate the INTERNAL and EXTERNAL policy of the bourgeois state, this is all one system.
  27. +4
    31 August 2018 12: 40
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    ... that is, as usual - you wrote nonsense. The Russian Federation did not and does not have any "right to all territories"; "legal succession" was limited (offhand) to the division of the USSR state debt, its property abroad and gold reserves. Everything

    -----------------------------------
    You, as usual, jumped out and wrote nonsense in general. Golovan, if Moscow will remain within the Moscow region and the rest of the territory, thanks to your liberal thoughts, will also split off, you will also write that everything was done correctly, if only your 150 thousand salary did not go away.
    1. +1
      31 August 2018 13: 42
      Quote: Altona
      You as usual popped up and wrote nonsense in general

      Um ... mail arrives badly. Let's try again:

      The Russian Federation has received official or tacit recognition as a state that has accepted from the USSR as the main components of its international legal status. In the agreements concluded by the Russian Federation with individual states, the new term “successor state” was used ... However, it can be noted that not all such agreements use this formula, proceeding, obviously, from the fact that it applies only to certain international affairs and does not pretend to supplant the traditional category of succession. The concept of the successor state was manifested in determining, firstly, the fate of the membership of the USSR in the UN and other international organizations, and secondly, the fate of the diplomatic and consular missions of the USSR in foreign states. Both issues were resolved by agreement with interested states.
      - International law, textbook for high schools, Chapter 3, § 8


      Quote: Altona
      Moscow will remain within the Moscow region and the rest of the territory, thanks to your liberal thoughts, will also break away

      good laughing good

      Altona, the transition to personality is a sign of a lack of intelligible arguments, isn't it?

      And, yes - all this, in your opinion, will happen solely due to "the power of my thoughts"? Yes you, my friend, are a dreamer wink

      Quote: Altona
      if only your 150 thousand salary did not go anywhere

      What is this edge? Altona, tie the grass, will not bring to good, as if Yes
  28. +1
    31 August 2018 13: 49
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Altona, the transition to personality is a sign of a lack of intelligible arguments, isn't it?

    -------------------------
    You yourself are the first to go over to the individual, then "and we are in favor." Watch yourself and answer more correctly. You are rude to everyone and everything and your arguments are empty. Speaking of your salary, I mean that you do not think about national security, but you translate everything into money. Your way of thinking is purely philistine and small-town, and your slogan "I do not believe the Government, but only myself" confirms this. Perhaps you don’t believe in the Medvedev government, but you don’t believe in statehood either, which is a purely liberal attitude.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  29. +5
    31 August 2018 13: 54
    Everything to friends, to the people of the law. So I see the situation.
  30. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +9
        31 August 2018 16: 52
        Altona, completely crazy about politics, the dog then what does it have to do with it? request
    2. +5
      31 August 2018 17: 49
      Quote: Altona
      Screwed you lousy dog ​​holder

      Altona ...
      "...... And Putin's" successes "by the United States began to collapse with all the levers they had.
      ... A lot of words about social protection and then it immediately turns into a robbery of the population.
      ... convinced him that there is nobody stronger than the USA in the world and we need to bend our back even lower, following the example of Poroshenko
      ... And now he is already a "leaving figure", an aging alpha male,
      ... And why does Russia need a breeding ground for the Nazi infection? Stalin did not take Berlin for nothing
      And Assad is simply hiding with the umbrella of our bases.
      ... As king and guardian of the people, Mr. Putin is a solid loser.
      ... there is nothing for you to dream about concessions and a pretty penny for old age, since our yard requires maintaining splendor
      ... these groups were created by foreigners too, and Americans wrote in them
      and other nonsense about our aspirations.
      ... You, as usual, jumped out and wrote nonsense in general. Golovan ...
      , if only your 150 thousand salaries would not go away.
      ... Your way of thinking is purely philistine and small-town
      You screwed up, holder of a lousy dog. Would write better about Putin adored by you ...
      ... you have no brains to formulate your own thoughts, you can only "sneeze" attack the commentators with the aim of some kind of self-affirmation ... "

      I read and ... like a classic in a novel, the master and Margarita: "The apricot gave abundant yellow foam, and the air smelled of a hairdressing salon."
      What kind of yellow foam is coming out of you? What for? Where does this conceit, the conviction in the choice of options for solving problems come from, the complexity of which you cannot even imagine? The groaning of an unrecognized philosopher? The fact is that the author of such lamentations can be characterized by the term "silkfinch!"
      My advice to you: write brief comments, while always adding - in my opinion ... it will be more correct
    3. +4
      31 August 2018 19: 45
      I apologize, but the dog shit in your slippers? Hold yourself in your hands!
  31. +4
    31 August 2018 14: 19
    yes, take it for yourself along with all the shobla. Only everything acquired by "back-breaking" work should be left here.
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    31 August 2018 19: 17
    Gorby also "enjoys". Yes, and Yeltsin "enjoyed" - a player of some Latin American team, it seems, Colombia bore the name Yeltsin. And how did it help us?
  34. +1
    1 September 2018 07: 21
    no longer uses in Russia
  35. 0
    1 September 2018 23: 56
    Quote: spektr9
    And you and your children are ready to go outside in a mask, because there the content of harmful substances exceeds the permissible tens or even hundreds of times?
    And my friend I live in Krasnoyarsk and for us this is the norm, as well as in other cities that feed and drink Moscow ...
    This economy did not come from the air and the price for it was not in money and exorbitant.
    And whoever ruined the same economy means you need to re-create it and if you are a Belarusian girl who is afraid of work, this does not mean that the country should suffer because of you
    Judging by your extremely naive statements, you are only ready to get a bribe for a flax on hot topics, drinking a seagull on the couch.

    Yes, and that tells me the bummer who is afraid of enterprises like fire, to whom give the alpine air a clean office and the opportunity to receive salary for sitting out pants

    “Oblomov,” “sit out my pants,” “and I'm at the factory,” “We feed Moscow"- Isn’t it too primitive, buddy malacholny? Ask for continuing education courses, the level of "agitation" is pallet.

    To practice.
    Look at the map below, read state regulations, raise your horizons, and rejoice that you live in Russia, if you live here, of course, in which GN 2.2.6.3538-18 "Maximum permissible concentrations (MPC) of microorganisms-producers, bacterial preparations and their components in the air of the working area".



    The level of environmental pollution in China is on average higher than in Russia, in ~10 times.

    Mortality in China for this reason in absolute terms is simply nightmare, according to the source cited above.
    There are no reasons to hush up such a situation. Including it will not bring any benefit to the Chinese people themselves. There are trends to improve the situation, but overall it continues to be disastrous.

    PS As soon as we are talking about environmental pollution - whoa! You are a hard worker in a sweat at the factory in Krasnoyarsk. The discussion of the Crimea will begin, it turns out that you are the son of a captain from Sevastopol?
    1. 0
      2 September 2018 00: 12
      I accidentally inserted the wrong GB, but from the desired section, you can figure it out.
  36. +2
    2 September 2018 09: 35
    Yes, they are enviously simple - to be able to strengthen oligarchic capitalism for 18 years and get more than 70% for this for that. Not sarcasm, we must pay tribute to him. Taking off my hat.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"