The United States will adjust the training of its military, taking into account the Ukrainian conflict

24
The United States sent military experts to Ukraine not only to prepare the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but also to draw lessons from the conflict in Donbas for itself, reports TASS Post Minister of the Army (US Army) Mark Esper.



According to the minister, the command is assimilating these lessons, examining them and exploring the possibility of adapting military doctrine, as well as the organizational structure of training for the US Army.

He reported that the military men extract information both from open sources and through intelligence. Then this information is studied by various ground forces training centers and share their findings with the US Department of Defense.

The US military is especially interested in using drones for target designation and reconnaissance, as well as the use of electronic warfare.

We learn all these lessons. And not only concerning the Ukrainian conflict. We study the actions of a potential adversary in many regions. We want to learn
Esper told reporters.

EW is one of the areas in which the army needs to be restructured, since these funds will be widely used in future conflicts, the minister added.

Recall that in the past month, Washington announced the allocation of $ 200 million to Ukraine for defense needs. In total, since 2014, the United States has sent about $ 1 billion for this purpose.
  • https://ru.depositphotos.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    30 August 2018 13: 34
    It seems to me that this is a bespont case, because the battles in the Donbass have a lack of an aviation component, which is unacceptable for the United States. Well, there is artillery or tank solitaire - it's about nothing with their huge capabilities from the air.
    1. +7
      30 August 2018 13: 42
      Any experience is useful, they study at the expense of their money, but they hang up a debt to Ukraine and count it as help.
    2. 0
      30 August 2018 13: 42
      So if the United States encounters an equal opponent, experience will be useful to them
      1. -1
        30 August 2018 14: 29
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Taki if the United States will face an equal opponent

        Yes, they will never make such a clash. S. Korea even put them in their place
    3. +4
      30 August 2018 13: 49
      Now yes. But for Americans, it is most likely of particular interest to start a conflict when the Armed Forces of Ukraine had complete air supremacy. The situation is very close to the American doctrine of maintaining a database. And then once in a clean field, from around the corner, a tank suddenly ... aviation was knocked out even without a developed air defense system. Why not take a closer look at why it turned out not as always.
    4. +2
      30 August 2018 18: 35
      Quote: Altona
      It seems to me that this is a bespont case, because the battles in the Donbass have a lack of an aviation component, which is unacceptable for the United States.

      This is precisely the state that Americans are learning how to fight with an equal opponent. The general \ strategy, tactics, strengths and weaknesses of the trench warfare. Moreover, they also carry weapons to the Donbass for testing.
    5. +2
      30 August 2018 19: 45
      Quote: Altona
      It seems to me that this is a bespont case, because the battles in the Donbass have a lack of an aviation component, which is unacceptable for the United States. Well, there is artillery or tank solitaire - it's about nothing with their huge capabilities from the air.


      Suspicious activity was noticed around the Crimean bridge: a United States reconnaissance aircraft Lockheed P-3 Orion was found in the sky over the crossing ....


      Do not underestimate the likely enemy, who is consistently preparing for war.
  2. +3
    30 August 2018 13: 42
    All the same, they are learning, not teaching.
  3. +1
    30 August 2018 13: 43
    Quote: igorbrsv
    So if the United States encounters an equal opponent, experience will be useful to them

    ----------------------
    USA usually prefer 4-5 times superiority, it is written down everywhere.
  4. 0
    30 August 2018 13: 44
    learn from the conflict in the Donbass

    Yankee, go home! angry
  5. +4
    30 August 2018 13: 46
    It would be strange if the most warring army in the world did not study conflicts and convert them into experience. wink
  6. 0
    30 August 2018 13: 48
    Who would doubt that the Ukrainians are experimental rabbits of the United States, on which they gain practical experience of a tough civil conflict. No.
  7. +5
    30 August 2018 13: 52
    We study the actions of a potential adversary in many regions.

    yeah, you can’t argue ... wherever you got into it, like cockroaches crawled around the ball ...
  8. +4
    30 August 2018 13: 53
    You can learn a lot from the Bluest Army of Europe.
  9. 0
    30 August 2018 14: 28
    It is worthy of praise, I believe that ours is not stupid. As an example, the teachings in Chebarkul.
  10. 0
    30 August 2018 14: 31
    It looks so funny when Americans want to "learn from themselves." Learn and learn, Lenin bequeathed.
  11. 0
    30 August 2018 15: 01
    Yeah, as well as taking into account the Syrian, Yemeni, Iraqi, Afghan and what else?
    Some nonsense every conflict has its own specifics and does not prepare for each.
    It is enough for the army to be ready as part of its training program, and the generals, if not idiots, will find the right tactics in battle already along the way.
  12. 0
    30 August 2018 16: 25
    let their vietnamese ten-year experience be remembered and knocked home .....
  13. +1
    30 August 2018 17: 13
    The United States will adjust the training of its military, taking into account the Ukrainian conflict


    To get into the boilers? Well good luck)))
  14. -2
    30 August 2018 23: 15
    guys, I just understand you. But one thing remains a mystery - as if the Americans were wrong both in the past and now, why don’t you adopt their strategy? You don’t even have to invent a bicycle. Take over the best, all the more it is possible, and implement in the troops.
    And the strategy is very simple, every conflict is a testing ground for analysis and try. That's all. They try to study wherever possible.
    Jack O'Neill (Yuri) said very clearly - "It would be strange if the most belligerent army in the world did not study conflicts and convert them into experience" How can you say even better?
    1. +1
      30 August 2018 23: 28
      why don't you adopt their strategy?


      Their strategy? Try to bend half of the world, behave completely inadequately and show yourself to put it mildly arrogant and strange?
      No thanks smile
      1. -1
        30 August 2018 23: 35
        Did I write about "bending over half the world"? I can only regret your speculation. Do not sprinkle them with my words.
        It was only about training and gaining experience wherever possible.
        1. +3
          31 August 2018 00: 57
          Quote: ShinBet
          It was only about training and gaining experience wherever possible.

          Consider you heard. Yes Moreover, much earlier than you said this, and even earlier than you thought about it. laughing I open the thought: two Chechen, 888, Donbass, Syria ... So with gaining experience, as well as with the introduction of it in our order. And yes, nobody releases mattresses with priznymi from the field of view. hi
          1. -1
            31 August 2018 17: 30
            put you a plus Yes . But I didn’t mean it. Maybe he didn’t put it right.
            I will try to explain more prosaically.
            The teacher calls the student to the blackboard, and he kind of learned homework and answers the question, but gets a low mark for the answer. He does not understand why request and reacts to it with the well-known phrase - "I studied at home." And another student answers the same question in the same way, but gets a high mark wink .

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"