How much do Russian military bases on the Allied territory cost?

27
How much do Russian military bases on the Allied territory cost?


After the signing of agreements on the cessation of the existence of the Soviet Union, the international community recognized the Russian Federation as the successor of the USSR. The successor country automatically received all the rights and obligations of its predecessor, this also applied to the armed forces.



True, many republics subsequently demanded the complete withdrawal of Russian troops from the territory of independent states. However, in the territory of some states there remained not combat, but rather significant ones for ensuring the normal functioning of the vital activity of the army base. At present, Russia leases dozens of foreign facilities for military bases, the use of which is supposed to pay money, but it rarely comes to purely financial calculations - especially in the case of leasing facilities in the territory of the CSTO allies. So to say, collective security should not be negotiable. Therefore, the form of settlement with the participants of the Organization is very specific - weapon, energy resources at domestic prices, the cancellation of old debts or the very fact of presence, as an element of security in the region, but sometimes just promises.

Armenia: military barter

102-I Russian military base (personnel - 4,5 thousand people) is deployed in Gyumri. The agreement on its placement in Armenia was signed in 1995 for a period of 25 years. The purpose of base deployment is to ensure the defense of the republic together with the national army and to fulfill obligations under the Collective Security Treaty.

Despite the fact that the actual rent for the base in Gyumri is not charged from Russia, we still have to pay for weapons for loyalty to the Russian military. To date, arms deliveries have been fully completed under the Armenian-Russian loan agreement for 200 million dollars.

For these funds at a discount price, Armenia has stocked up on serious arsenal: MLRS Smerch, Igla-S SAM, TOS-1A heavy flamethrower systems with transporting and charging vehicles, 9М113М guided missiles, RPG-26 grenade launchers, Dragunov sniper rifles, armored vehicles “Tiger and other weapons. They also became the world's first importers of Iskander missile systems.
But this is not all, in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement signed on October 24 of 2017 of the year, the Russian Federation will provide the Armenian side with a state export credit for another 100 million dollars to finance the supply of military products.
Thus, the base in Armenia costs the Russian side 300 million dollars of debts, this is to the existing debt of 100 million dollars.

Tajikistan: weapons and donated dollars

The 201-I Russian military base is deployed in the republic, which is the largest land military unit of the Russian Federation located outside its borders. The meaning of her stay: jointly with the Tajik army, ensuring the security of the state (an ally of the CSTO), maintaining stability in the region.

Another Russian military facility in Tajikistan is the Window optical-electronic complex. He (since Soviet times) is included in the space monitoring system. Now he is working in the interests of the aerospace defense forces of the Russian Federation. The object is transferred to Russian ownership. For this, Moscow wrote off a $ 242 million debt to Tajikistan. In addition, in the 2006 year, the Russian Federation provided Dushanbe with free military assistance in the amount of more than $ 76 million.

In addition, from 2005 to 2010 Tajikistan was free of charge Transferred more than 13 thousands of small arms and melee weapons, thousands of pieces of military equipment, including 317 units of armored weapons. ()

Kyrgyzstan: forgotten debts

Here Russia leases the Kant airbase (lease term is 49 years), a test base of anti-submarine weapons of the Russian Navy, a naval communications center, an automatic seismic station and a radio seismic laboratory of the Seismic Service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. In 2012, the authorities of the republic declared that “the unpaid debt of Russia for the bases from 2008 to 2011 amounted to more than 15 million dollars a year”. Soon Moscow returned the underpayment to Bishkek, and at the same time reminded about the debt of $ 493 million dollars. After that, the Kyrgyz became more compliant, and Moscow wrote off $ 240 million of Kyrgyzstan, to facilitate its new borrowing.

At the same time, Russia annually pays Kyrgyzstan 4,5 million dollars in rent payments for the presence of the Navy’s test base in Issyk-Kul and the Russian Federation’s long-distance communications center.

Kazakhstan: profitable lodgers

Russia incurs the largest rental costs in Kazakhstan, where the Baikonur Cosmodrome is located. For the placement of test bases and transport regiment aviation Russia pays $ 170-200 million per year.

Up to $ 50 million is the cost of renting other objects: 929 State Flight Test Center, Sary-Shagan Test Site, 4 State Central Test Site, a separate radio unit, a separate transport aviation regiment of the Russian Air Force, 20-I separate test site station and two measuring points.

Belarussia: guests on self-sufficiency

In the district center Gantsevichi a separate radio node "Volga" is deployed. The number of personnel directly involved in the use of the site less than 1200 military specialists and civil servants ().

Its territory is leased by Russia under the 1995 agreement of the year for 25 years. Included in the missile warning system (SPRN). Another Russian object is the 43 communication node Vileyka. It provides communication with strategic nuclear submarines of the Russian Navy. The number of staff of the radio station less than 250 is a man of military and civilian specialists.

Minsk does not charge Moscow for its military facilities. But on According to some experts, they could cost Russia 10-20 million dollars annually. By the way, at one time the Americans offered Lukashenko 10 billions of dollars for the removal of Russian radar from the Belarusian land. The president then replied that "fraternity with Russia is not for sale."
The agreements on the deployment of these military facilities on the territory of Belarus entered into force for the Belarusian side 7 June 1996 and are valid until 7 June 2021, and Minsk can notify the Russian side of the intention to refuse further extension of these agreements to 6 June 2020.

Given the ongoing trade, gas and oil conflicts of recent years, it is worth believing that now the Belarusian side would not refuse money.

In view of this circumstance, as some experts believe, in the near future we can expect the start of bargaining for these military facilities.
First stir up interest To the Russian military objects the Belarusian opposition began. However, this is not a factor that should be seriously taken into account, but it may push the leadership of the neighboring Republic to reconsider its position.

It is unlikely that Belarus will be interested in money. Most likely, in exchange for our facilities, Minsk will ask for equipment and weapons, in particular, C-400 SAMs or combat aircraft at preferential prices or on credit. And it can be assumed that the Kremlin will give the go-ahead, since the Belarusian side, in particular the republic’s army, in fact remains the only real ally in the western direction that can withstand the aggression from the North Atlantic alliance, if necessary.

However, I would like to recall the situation with the Gabala radar station in Azerbaijan. In 2012, Baku demanded a rent for the station in the amount of 300 million dollars. After that, the Russian side refused the services of Azerbaijan, and the new station in Armavir (Krasnodar Territory) blocked the zone.

In the near future, the question of finding Russian facilities on the territory of Belarus will be considered at the highest level, and we will be able to understand that the leadership of the two allied states places the highest priority on military security.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    29 August 2018 06: 21
    Defense is expensive, so there’s no getting away from it. We need bases in other parts of the world.
    1. +3
      29 August 2018 06: 27
      Everything is cheaper than fighting on its territory ...
      1. -2
        29 August 2018 08: 03
        As soon as the troops withdrew from western Europe, the USSR collapsed.
        What is more expensive country or military base?
  2. +1
    29 August 2018 06: 54
    After the signing of agreements on the cessation of the existence of the Soviet Union, the international community recognized the Russian Federation as the successor of the USSR. The successor country automatically received all the rights and obligations of its predecessor, this also applied to the armed forces.

    I didn’t read further. The author is completely off topic and repeat the agitation of the cheers-patriots. The USSR had 15 successors. For example, the legal succession in the territory of the Union republics did not automatically transfer to Russia, but to each republic individually. Also with airspace, minerals and even weapons. Moreover, the legal successor does not sign an agreement on the division of former property and debts with wrongdoers. He inherits this rightfully. What did not happen to Russia. By the way, agreements have not yet been signed with all republics.

    If 14 republics seceded from the USSR, and the Russian Federation remained, then legally it would be possible to speak of a successor country, but the Russian Federation was the first to destroy the USSR, changed its flag, anthem, and constitution. Even forced the military to take the oath of office to the new state. What exactly is this country "continuing"? Possess the territory of the republic? So Armenia was then a successor country. And in the agreement on the termination of the existence of the Soviet Union, there is not a word about the "successor country" or "legal successor".

    And finally, there is not a single international legal act (from the word ABSOLUTELY) where the international community would recognize the Russian Federation as the successor of the USSR.

    Author, learn the materiel. negative
    1. +6
      29 August 2018 07: 07
      Well, you should not comment on the words of a person "who did not read further, but is terribly outraged!" As for the bases ... It would be interesting to hear the rationale for finding the base of the Russian Armed Forces in Armenia, except for the actual defense of Armenia itself from a very friendly environment ?! Armenians should be grateful and generally create paradise conditions for our servicemen !!! However ... Regarding Belarus, there are a lot of shouts, we ourselves with a mustache, and we do not need a base of the Russian Aerospace Forces !!! In this case, I recommend that you answer the following question: What group was there in the BSSR? How much did Lukashenka reduce his aircraft as he climbed under the Russian umbrella? Or has world peace come?
      1. +4
        29 August 2018 08: 04
        Quote: professor
        The USSR had 15 legal successors.
        wassat
        professor urgently to the mirror and

        Quote: professor
        learn the materiel. negative

        The legal successor of the USSR is Russia.

        Everything you write about
        Quote: professor
        For example, the legal succession in the territory of the Union republics did not automatically transfer to Russia

        has nothing to do with the USSR. This is just a change of ownership in economic matters. None of these fragments is responsible for the USSR, but on the contrary, shouting "mother" is disowning the USSR.
        In fact, this is a banal theft. Was yours became ours. This "right" is valued in your world. wink

        Do not dope your head neither yourself nor people.
        1. +2
          29 August 2018 10: 02
          13 January The 1992 of the Russian Foreign Ministry sent a note to the heads of diplomatic missions in Moscow stating that the Russian Federation continues to exercise its rights and fulfill its obligations under all treaties concluded by the USSR. In accordance with this note, the “world community” tacitly acknowledged the status of the successor state of the USSR to the Russian Federation.
          FEDERAL LAW On international treaties of the Russian Federation of 15.07.1995
          "This Federal Law applies to international treaties to which the Russian Federation is a party as a state-successor to the USSR." Part 3, Art. 1
        2. 0
          29 August 2018 15: 42
          Quote: For example
          The legal successor of the USSR is Russia.

          In your dreams, as there are no other (material) evidence for this and cannot be.

          Quote: For example
          None of these fragments is responsible for the USSR, but on the contrary, shouting "mother" is disowning the USSR.

          It's true. Russia is also not responsible for the USSR. Neither for the exploits of the USSR nor for the crimes of the USSR.

          Quote: tanit
          "This Federal Law applies to international treaties to which the Russian Federation is a party as a state-successor to the USSR." Part 3, Art. 1

          Nifiga. This is Wishlist. For example, in the USSR state border treaties, let’s say with Turkey, Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan are parties as a state, not Russia.

          Quote: Antares
          Quote: professor
          I did not read further

          I once revered lawyers (including Russian) regarding the legal succession of the Russian Federation, which are so generously treated by the Russian layman. So there are really no contracts. World society has agreed with the status quo (someone pays, someone takes embassies and other property)
          The property issue has become an internal one among the former. republics of the USSR, foreign property passed to the one who pays. A place in the UN (more precisely, the right of veto) is the same.
          All attempts to somehow resolve the issue were successfully blocked by the position of the Russian Federation (however, the intransigence of Ukraine is also known) and gradually lost relevance.
          There is no legal assignment of the Russian Federation -SSSR. Since there is no legal basis and at least some kind of paper (contract)

          Shhh. You tell them nothing about "paper". They'll go crazy looking for her. lol
        3. -1
          29 August 2018 20: 19
          Prokhfesor zadolbali- teaches the rules of the Russian language, then the Charter of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, then he tells who is the legal successor of the USSR ... And constantly ..bears into the water. Professor - your comments about Israel are very interesting, but in relation to Russia you are not a professor - PTUshnik.
    2. -1
      29 August 2018 08: 50
      Quote: professor
      I did not read further

      I once revered lawyers (including Russian) regarding the legal succession of the Russian Federation, which are so generously treated by the Russian layman. So there are really no contracts. World society has agreed with the status quo (someone pays, someone takes embassies and other property)
      The property issue has become an internal one among the former. republics of the USSR, foreign property passed to the one who pays. A place in the UN (more precisely, the right of veto) is the same.
      All attempts to somehow resolve the issue were successfully blocked by the position of the Russian Federation (however, the intransigence of Ukraine is also known) and gradually lost relevance.
      There is no legal assignment of the Russian Federation -SSSR. Since there is no legal basis and at least some kind of paper (contract)
    3. -2
      29 August 2018 10: 24
      You’ll talk about international law with your Americans about idols! They sneezed at all international rights and UN resolutions! And yes .. what other international community, when half or even more of the planet dances to the tune of the United States, including your independent state to Israel!
      1. +1
        29 August 2018 19: 53
        Quote: igorka357
        internationally

        what's the point? There is one rule, the rule of the strong. Weight, strength, number of allies, resources, etc.
        And the paper ... and the words ... this is tinsel.
        Americans are not my idol. However, they have more opportunities to change the rules.
        Israel is not my homeland.
  3. +2
    29 August 2018 07: 26
    The United States has a lot of military bases on the territory of various countries. And these countries "do not twist the arms" of the United States, but follow a given course ... But the situation with the Russian military bases is somewhat different, here they "twist your hands" and extort money. ..
    1. 0
      29 August 2018 07: 58
      Quote: parusnik
      ....... But the situation with the Russian military bases is somewhat different, here they both "twist your hands" and extort money ...
      One way or another, there are changes in names, rewriting of a common story. Probably only Belarus does not change its name and does not condemn socialism.
    2. -1
      4 September 2018 13: 22
      Quote: parusnik
      . But the situation with Russian military bases is somewhat different

      Maybe then the matter is not only in military bases, did not think in this direction? We have the fastest missiles and tanks the best and super aircraft ... and the salary below ... very strange .. inexplicably simple ..
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    29 August 2018 08: 21
    The cost of military bases in the post-Soviet countries, Syria, Crimea ... has increased the technological backwardness of Russia, over the past 10 years from the West - doubled, and in terms of living standards, Russia fell to 101 place in the world, next to Tajikistan, Zambia, Tanzania. ..
    https://www.finanz.ru/novosti/aktsii/csr-tekhnologicheskaya-otstalost-rossii-vyrosla-vdvoe-za-10-let-1002911074
    https://gotoroad.ru/best/indexlife
    1. +5
      29 August 2018 08: 54
      Quote: alta
      Costs of military bases in post-Soviet countries, Syria, Crimea

      hardly. The excess profit from oil was so high that it was possible to buy everyone and everything and be the Northern UAE.
      But the economic situation was not only worsened by the maintenance of the bases (they were not so expensive)
      but 2 wars, an unsuccessful domestic and foreign policy, relying on a commodity economy - it costs money.
    2. -2
      29 August 2018 09: 05
      Only rich countries can afford to keep military bases in other countries without lowering the standard of living of the population, today we see numerous demonstrations of the poor people of Iran, whose leadership spends huge funds on military bases and weapons.
      In Western countries, a person is in the first place, and the state is in the second, and in Russia, Iran, S. Korea .. - in the first state, in the second person.
      The leaders of Western countries are forced to put a person in the first place, otherwise they will be left behind in the next election.
      1. +1
        29 August 2018 10: 33
        In Western countries, a policeman has the right to shoot you like a dog, if you do not obey his orders, and if there is a threat to his health or God forbid his life .. he is simply obliged to shoot you like a dog! Here is such a first place .. laughingand yes .. what’s there for unemployed people that are for lending to the population? In the USA, every second ordinary citizen is obliged to pay a debt to death, you don’t pay, they are thrown out of the house with young children, and they won’t ask for the name, we don’t have the rights to kick out, give installments, and so on! Have you seen enough of the beautiful pictures from Beverly Hills, and the rich business districts of New York and Washington, and you think that everyone lives there? Yes, you just did not see the provincial towns of the USA, this is a real nightmare!
        1. +1
          29 August 2018 17: 29
          Quote: igorka357
          a policeman has the right to shoot you down like a dog if you do not obey his order, and if there is a threat to health or God forbid his life.

          Excuse me, do we have a very bad right? or maybe it’s just because the police (after the next reform) do not have any left on the streets? (Immediately, when I saw a lot of foot patrols of the Ministry of Internal Affairs staff in the city, this is before the 2018 World Cup, and before, and after there are no employees at all, there are practically no people in the uniform of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, apparently afraid of walking).
          1. 0
            31 August 2018 09: 21
            What is the city called yours .. Zakolbasinsk? Some kind of nonsense was written .. in Ust-Ilimsk we have 90-15 patrols of PPSnikov every night for 20 thousand people .. and even Ovoshniki ...
      2. 0
        29 August 2018 11: 08
        Yeah tell us congress
      3. +1
        29 August 2018 19: 59
        Quote: alta
        may allow

        what logic is there, if you are rich, you must control the sources of wealth and yours and order (your order in which you are rich)
        that is, you earn and immediately spend on maintaining order and your allies, and thereby maintain the source of your wealth.
        If you just keep a base for the sake of image and do not control the ways of obtaining wealth or security of your trade, then this is a waste of money.
    3. +2
      29 August 2018 11: 14
      Quote: alta
      The cost of military bases in the post-Soviet countries, Syria, Crimea ... has increased the technological backwardness of Russia, over the past 10 years from the West - doubled, and in terms of living standards, Russia fell to 101 place in the world, next to Tajikistan, Zambia, Tanzania. ..

      Now it turns out that the HTO doesn’t sleep at night about Russia thinking - the Israelis! No thanks, thought already! You bring this deep thought to Netanyahu! Prime your campaign in Moscow just registered. Often already rippled in the eyes. People are laughing - you did not see Netanyahu yesterday, but the day before yesterday ?! Did you get sick?
      1. -2
        29 August 2018 16: 27
        If Netanyahu hadn’t traveled to Moscow, and the chief of the General Staff of Russia had not visited Jerusalem with the Minister of Defense, then the story of 1982 would probably have been repeated. when, the troops of the USSR were forced to leave Syria with shame.
        "Until now, few in our country know that one of the main reasons for the perestroika was the defeat that Israeli aviation carried out on the Syrian air defense system in the Lebanese Bekaa valley on June 9-10, 1982.
        The system was, of course, the Soviet one hundred percent, and the newest at that time.
        It was impossible to write off the catastrophe for the ordinary incapacity of the Arabs: even the Israelis recognized that the Syrians fought well this time, moreover, Soviet instructors were sitting next to the Syrians in the cabins of the destroyed SAMs.
        It’s just that the enemy fought in a new way, and we fought in the old way. "
        (Alexander Khramchikhin. Military construction in Russia. “Banner” 2005, No. 12)
        1. +3
          29 August 2018 17: 31
          Quote: alta
          then apparently the history of 1982g would be repeated. when, Soviet troops were forced to leave Syria in disgrace.
          "Until now, few in our country know that one of the main reasons for the perestroika was the defeat that Israeli aviation carried out on the Syrian air defense system in the Lebanese Bekaa valley on June 9-10, 1982.
          The system was, of course, the Soviet one hundred percent, and the newest at that time.
          It was impossible to write off the catastrophe for the ordinary incapacity of the Arabs: even the Israelis recognized that the Syrians fought well this time, moreover, Soviet instructors were sitting next to the Syrians in the cabins of the destroyed SAMs.
          It’s just that the enemy fought in a new way, and we fought in the old way. "

          Very true words! Yes, in the Syrian battles at the beginning of 1980, the Syrian air forces (read: Soviet almost) lost either 80, or 100 combat vehicles, literally against Israeli couples ... But now in Syria the situation has changed a lot (including technologically), and it’s good that Russia and Israel have no conflict, but normal cooperation.
  6. 0
    8 September 2018 23: 51
    But what are they allies in FIG ?! Some darmogloths with a fat, like a donkey, sorry my jacket, with their necks, which besides milking us, do not know how.
    Efficiency from them is zero! And who rush into the embrasure for us ??? Armenia, with a zero economy, which has long been firmly between the legs ov? Maybe Tajikistan, whose conflict with Uzbekistan and the economy is no better than Armenian? Ali Kyrgyzstan, which has a negative financial balance and has more than 3 billion foreign debt?
    Take a look at the official export list of these countries. In addition to fruits and other agricultural products, a little bit of minerals (Armenia does not have them at all), port wine, knitwear and, most importantly, there is nothing efficient for the greyhound labor force. Maybe Belarus, which is like a weather vane here and there?
    As already written above, slavers! All give, give, give ...... and return-0!
    Look at the numbers. Armenia ..... 500 million debt. And how will she pay? In kind? Or do we still believe in the loyalty of the Armenians? Tajikistan .... more than 300 million. Kyrgyzstan ... more than 200 million. Kazakhstan ..... 170-200 million per year + up to 50 million for the rental of other facilities.
    All these "allies" have negative trade and financial balances! If something can be returned, it is only from Kazakhstan. All! Forget the rest!
    In a word, we throw millions into the wind. Rather, not millions, but billions. For what???

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"