NATO tanks will be destroyed: Russia began to develop new missiles

37
The High Precision Complexes holding, which had previously developed the Kornet anti-tank missile system, has launched a new project. Specialists began work on the creation of a new missile to defeat tanks. This became known during the military-technical forum “Army-2018”.

To date, the tank is the leading shock combat unit in ground battles. For more than one year, many countries have modified the armor of their combat vehicles, equipping tanks with additional means of defense. In addition to the main armor, this includes dynamic protection, calculated against cumulative ammunition, and complexes capable of shooting down a projectile flying into a tank. Such a “sandwich” is very difficult to break through with obsolete rockets.





Of course, few armies of the world have the opportunity to equip their tank division with a modern "multi-layered" armor system, since such "equipment" costs a lot of money. Nevertheless, in the future, such developments will become widely available and cheaper, respectively, it is necessary to keep pace with the times and develop new technologies further.

That is why Russia has begun to develop new anti-tank missiles that will be able to destroy enemy tanks, in particular, even the most advanced NATO combat vehicles, equipped with modern means of protection and armor, with a single shot. In the conditions of military operations such an advantage can play a decisive role. Such parity will allow Russia to maintain its leading role in the military sphere.

"High-precision complexes" have not yet revealed the future name of the projected ammunition and its characteristics. More details will be known closer to the timing of the construction of the first test samples. Anyway, this news is very significant for our army, so we will follow the progress of work in this area.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    24 August 2018 09: 07

    Endless confrontation between shield and sword


    1. 0
      24 August 2018 09: 55
      Quote: bulvas
      Endless confrontation between shield and sword

      Verno. I would add that it is necessary to improve modern systems as well. The same heavy ATGM "Kornet", which has no equal in the world in terms of range and power, should be brought to the principle; - I shot it, I forgot! There was news that they brought it up, but that's it?
    2. +1
      24 August 2018 11: 46
      Quote: bulvas
      Endless confrontation between shield and sword


      Davy Crockett is the ideal anti-tank weapon of all times and peoples. This would be based on the "Cornet". And "Jewelin" smokes quietly on the sidelines. fellow
  2. +3
    24 August 2018 09: 07
    In any case, this news is very significant for our army, therefore we will follow the progress of work in this direction.
    We will. Firstly, this is a very, very necessary matter for the defense of the country. And secondly, it is simply interesting. hi
  3. -2
    24 August 2018 09: 09
    leave NATO at least one tank!
    1. +19
      24 August 2018 09: 15
      leave NATO at least one tank!
      We’ll put your own. On a pedestal. For memory.
  4. +3
    24 August 2018 09: 15
    Stupid question. Why rockets, and not a drone? Flies to himself slowly, saw a tank, dived. And why should warheads have exactly explosives? And if a combustible mixture. Punch will not break, but it will fry. Also a hand grenade launcher, why can’t it have a combustible mixture instead of an explosive? Who knows?
    1. +9
      24 August 2018 09: 37
      Quote: Mister Creed
      Stupid question. Why rockets, and not a drone?

      The question is not stupid, but most likely just a little naive. Well, firstly, the means of destruction of tanks are not limited to only ATGMs, there are other means. Secondly, for some reason you were drawn to "Molotov cocktails" ..., the tank's defense systems far exceeded your threats, in order to "fry" the tank, you need a lot of combustible mixture (an RPG grenade will not fit. chose the optimal ones, although I want to note that they do not stop there and are looking for new ones.
      As for new developments (article), I think the missiles will become much smarter (like anti-ship systems), include an electronic warfare station against KAZ and with the direction of attack (control using other principles) will work, perhaps a couple, three missiles will attack " flock ", of course the pleasure will be much more expensive, but if the goal is achieved, it justifies ... well, this is so pleasant fantasy ... Yes
    2. +2
      24 August 2018 09: 50
      Take a bumblebee)))
    3. 0
      24 August 2018 15: 41
      so there is a Bumblebee))) is also manual
      1. 0
        25 August 2018 14: 28
        RCG 1 and 2 are also possible then.
  5. +2
    24 August 2018 09: 22
    Just as a machine gun once displaced cavalry from a battlefield, so sooner or later anti-tank weapons will displace a tank in the classical sense of the word.

    It is enough to compare the cost of the means of destruction and the cost of a modern tank.
  6. +5
    24 August 2018 09: 34
    Something tells me that this development is related to a new gun for the T-14 and will work in tandem with its "pterodactyl".
  7. +2
    24 August 2018 09: 42
    Russia began to develop new missiles


    Read correctly, these missiles are already there and are being tested))
  8. -1
    24 August 2018 09: 53
    Finally, ours began to pay due attention to the privacy regime ... Let the adversary receive surprises UNEXPECTED. It is only a pity that there is less reliable information in the public domain ... There is nothing special to discuss ... laughing
  9. +1
    24 August 2018 09: 53
    need a rocket with a speed of at least 500 m \ s and with penetration better in the region of 2000 mm of homogeneous armor
  10. -1
    24 August 2018 09: 53
    I did not drive. Not a complex? Just rockets?
    1. 0
      24 August 2018 10: 42
      Just for Cornet there will be a new rocket.
  11. 0
    24 August 2018 09: 54
    Currently, if KAZ is installed on the equipment and nothing interferes with its operation, the number of missiles required for its destruction increases from one to two.
    This is me about the passage "Such a" sandwich "is very difficult to penetrate with outdated missiles."
    Nothing complicated, really.
  12. +2
    24 August 2018 09: 57
    IMHO ATGMs definitely need to be developed in a "multi-caliber" version. And then your eyes are on your forehead when you look at how in Syria an ATGM, which stands like an apartment in Moscow, is driving a stoned baboon with a self-propelled gun. That's it - a light guided projectile with primitive laser guidance from the operator, or with wires - for such cases. They will still shoot, but it is clearly cheaper. And there is no need for 100500 kg of explosives, the tandem and the "fire-forget" system, they do not put on the "Curtain" yet wink And here is a super-hyper-twisted complex for tanks. In theory, the launcher can be combined ...
    1. 0
      24 August 2018 10: 28
      Absolutely.
    2. +1
      24 August 2018 11: 13
      laughing Vashcheta, in the article we are talking about overcoming the modern protection of the tank, but about safari for a single terrorist in Syria. There is a niche for this.
    3. +3
      24 August 2018 13: 05
      Small ATGMs are even more expensive than large. Because the electronics have to be put into the GOS even more compact, and therefore more expensive. We have developed missiles specifically for small shock drones. A rocket is a half kilo toy, but it costs like a car. But if the hostile uncle is a general or leader of the militants, then the toy pays for itself.
  13. 0
    24 August 2018 10: 27
    We need a unified ammunition, which could be launched from the shoulder and from the machine.
  14. -1
    24 August 2018 11: 13
    We do guns as much as we can, we wouldn’t forget about butter!
  15. -1
    24 August 2018 11: 19
    Quote: Mar. Tira
    [. The same heavy ATGM "Kornet" which has no equal in the world in terms of range and power, to bring to the principle; - I shot it, I forgot! There was news that they brought it up, but that's it?

    Third-generation ATGMs already exist in the world, the main characteristic of which is just the implementation of the “shot-and-forget” principle: the American FGM-148 Javelin complex and the Spike family of Israeli ATGMs, which use various methods of targeting: by wire, radio command, laser beam and using IR GOS.
    Russia does not have a third-generation complex, only now they are starting to develop ...
    With a range of up to 8 km, Spike is ahead of the American Javelin and Russian Cornets
    http://cyclowiki.org/wiki/Спайк_(ПТРК)
    Apparently, this is why Azerbaijan is buying Israeli complexes of the third generation Spike, after their appearance, and not the obsolete Russian Cornet.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      24 August 2018 22: 23
      For 2017, there were 215 "Spikes" and 800 9M123 (Chrysanthemum). And "Cornet" went to Armenia.
    3. 0
      25 August 2018 14: 31
      Is Spike like a Dart used from a shoulder?
  16. -1
    24 August 2018 11: 29
    For our Western and Middle Eastern partners, no missiles are a pity
  17. 0
    24 August 2018 12: 18
    Just today I read this news to Cornet make a new rocket with the possibility of hitting a tank in the upper hemisphere.
  18. -1
    24 August 2018 12: 47
    This is very good news. In Russia, the best ATGMs in the world, but you should not rest on our laurels ...
  19. 0
    24 August 2018 12: 56
    Will they put the STS on the ATGM?
    1. +2
      24 August 2018 13: 00
      Maybe GNS, and maybe GOOS. wink
      1. 0
        24 August 2018 22: 32
        Better GOS - more precisely! good drinks
    2. 0
      25 August 2018 21: 05
      The court of publications in the Russian Federation mastered IR matrices and Active GOS ... respectively, took up the ATGM of the 3rd generation.
  20. +1
    24 August 2018 16: 53
    It is high time! In this "topic" we are lagging behind the "amerikosov" specifically!
  21. 0
    24 August 2018 19: 18
    The High Precision Complexes holding, which had previously developed the Kornet anti-tank missile system, has launched a new project. Specialists began work on the creation of a new missile to destroy tanks.
    In any case, this news is very significant for our army.
    wassat

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"