US Intelligence: A nuclear-powered rocket of the Russian Federation fell into the Barents Sea

The American channel CNBC, citing US intelligence, issued material in which it announced tests of nuclear-powered missiles in Russia. At the same time, the material has already sounded the classic variation for the collective West from the “in all likelihood” series. So, literally stated the following:

American intelligence believes that, in all likelihood, the Russian nuclear-powered rocket remains lost at sea as a result of an unsuccessful launch in the 2017 year. Moscow is preparing an attempt to return it.

In the operation, as stated in the US media, Russian specialists will use three vessels, one of which is specialized in working with radioactive materials.

According to CNBC, we are talking about the “search area” in the Barents Sea.

Earlier on the same TV channel it was announced that Russia had already tested the newest type of weapons with a nuclear power plant four times already, but all four tests failed. The longest flight at the same time was about two minutes. The rocket, allegedly, did not fly and 35 km. It does not say what was chosen as the launch site, if the rocket, having flown only a few dozen kilometers, turned out to be in the waters of the Barents Sea.

Recall that earlier in Russia, a presentation of the latest weapons. It was demonstrated rocket complex of unlimited range with a nuclear power plant.

Comments

[LeonidL]

Fairy tales of the Viennese forest are good in the performance of professional artists, and not amateur drummers.

[Reptiloid]

Yes, this is an occasion for another cut !!!!!!!
To search for that which is not ---- it is possible to infinity and more expensive, more expensive, more people, means, to expand and deepen the search zone !!!!!

[maxim947]

Cut it again ... some kind of obsession ... Let’s bring here the pension reform with polymers.

[For example]

Quote: Reptiloid

Yes, this is an occasion for another cut !!!!!!!

My dear, you urgently need to see a doctor! Otherwise, you will be sawn

And the rocket could well find shelter in the sea. That's the test. Not all first launches are successful. As a result, it will fly and fly as it should!

[Polite Moose]

Quote: For example

And the rocket could well find shelter in the sea. That's the test. Not all first launches are successful.

Yes, if this were true, at least by 10%, there would be the entire American fleet in the area of ​​the fall, yes, there would be a fleet there, they would look for them from air mattresses day and night.

[Thrall]

striped suckers mixed up a flying torpedo with a rocket

[Shurik70]

That the Swedes are threatening 10% of the military budget to find a Russian submarine.
Now here the United States will be looking for a rocket.
It’s not the Baltic Sea, but some kind of black hole

[voyaka uh]

What for? A nuclear reactor in the Kyrgyz Republic is primarily a problem for manufacturers. Radiation. And the accident in the Barents Sea is an example.

[Nikolai]

Quote: voyaka uh

And the accident in the Barents Sea is an example.

Where is the example? Squeal do not understand whom and it is clear for what purpose an example? The timing was precisely tracked in 2017 ...

[voyaka uh]

Scout satellites are circling us all the time. What is the problem of tracking trials?

[Nikolai]

Quote: voyaka uh

Scout satellites are circling us all the time. What is the problem of tracking trials?

So what is the problem specifically with facts to give an example? And then it flew 35 km and is still looking at its coast, as if it were not yet visible ....
PS cons are not mine! This is not mine at all, only substantive claims !!!

[voyaka uh]

"and we are still looking at our coast, as if it is still not visible." ////
----
In the sea at the bottom is difficult to find something. Crashed planes are sometimes searched for many years. What surprises me more is not the accident, but the fact that such an initially dangerous - because of radiation - project began to be implemented in metal.

[vargo]

You are not talking about that! You are silent about the facts for some reason .. probably because these are just their empty words.
I have news for you personally!

According to intelligence services of the Russian Ministry of Defense, on the night of August 3, 2018, at 02:45 local time, an incident with US fighters occurred in the Gulf of Mexico. During a covert operation, two F35 fighters collided in the sky. Both fighters were seriously damaged, and sank. According to intelligence, both fighters carried bombs with a nuclear charge under the wing. The status of the pilots is unknown. Submarines are seen in the area. A number of specialized U.S. Navy ships, including a vessel with special equipment, to eliminate radioactive contamination will be involved in the search. Everything is kept in high secrecy mode! The data also confirms our sources in the leadership of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

Please consider what distinguishes this news from what we read in the US media.

[Yuyuka]

Quote: voyaka uh

"and we are still looking at our coast, as if it is still not visible." ////
----
In the sea at the bottom is difficult to find something. Crashed planes are sometimes searched for many years. What surprises me more is not the accident, but the fact that such an initially dangerous - because of radiation - project began to be implemented in metal.

I fully support your surprise - these ballistic missiles are damn dangerous! And they were also taken in metal and embodied, but set around the world!

[Hammer]

But you are not surprised and not outraged by the number of accidents of US aircraft with nuclear weapons on board and how many are lost (nuclear weapons)? But all this is already embodied in metal! Yes, God would be with them, with nuclear weapons. I am personally surprised that the state of Israel does not surprise or resent the fact that Western intelligence agencies (and their six from the gulf) transfer technologies and materials for the creation of chemical weapons (and they say bio) and the creation of drones to barmalies. Do you seriously believe that in the future this will not affect you and the barmalei from DAISH are better and more humane than Hamas? Unfortunately, you are not surprised at that ...

[sogdy]

Quote: voyaka uh

A nuclear reactor in the Kyrgyz Republic is primarily a problem for manufacturers. Radiation.

Voyaka, six months ago you did not know what an INP was. I suspect you don't know now. But you are talking about an atomic reactor on a CD with a "nuclear engine". Would you explain to us what you call a nuclear engine "and why does it need a reactor. For example, does a lithium battery belong to" nuclear engines "? But it is still atomic ... on laptops and in cell phones. But there is no reactor in it. Or you and don't know that ?!

[sogdy]

Quote: voyaka uh

What surprises me more is not the accident, but the fact that such an initially dangerous - because of radiation - project began to be implemented in metal.

I enlighten: tests of a jet nuclear engine in the USSR were completed in 1967. Find the "Planet of Crimson Clouds" with illustrations - it is drawn there. Alas, the size is not suitable for CD. And the speed assumes up to the second space.
So what are you talking about?

[_Ugene_]

The problem is that the satellites cannot watch everywhere and always, the satellite needs to specify exactly where and when to look, for this we need accurate information when and where secret tests will be conducted. It is naive to believe that satellites continuously capture the entire territory of the planet with high resolution, for such a task satellites are not enough.

[voyaka uh]

Intelligence satellites fly not everywhere, but over test sites. Polygons. These places are famous. And test times are becoming known for the increased activity of technology in front of them. Satellites fly in the same orbit one after another - several - so as to capture evenly all day.
The video comes with breaks, but small. These are trivial facts, nothing new.

[_Ugene_]

Intelligence satellites fly not everywhere, but over test sites.

Russia has a very large territory, it is not necessary to carry out tests in the same places, it is possible to monitor Israel continuously and the fly will not fly unnoticed. Although, theoretically, they could have taken pictures, but it’s not at all necessary, our intelligence probably knows where honey is spread for American satellites and it’s not a problem to transfer the test to an unexpected place

[sogdy]

Quote: voyaka uh

. Satellites fly in the same orbit one after another - several - so as to capture evenly all day.

Ahrenet! Have you counted how many of them are needed for ultra-high resolution? And for a filtered signal (what journalists usually call "sensors")? These are not communication satellites, they have a capture angle of less than 2 degrees.
Her, you still have more and more fun.

[brr1]

The calm reflections of Russophobe. Stop talking nonsense.

[hrych]

Quote: For example

the rocket is quite could find shelter in the sea

The article has already answered the "could":

variation from the series "in all likelihood"

And even if she crashed in the Barents Sea (she could in all likelihood), it could not (in all likelihood) fly an unfortunate 35 km, since we know from the presentation that the launch is carried out from a ground installation. But in fact, these information stuffing in order to show that the slamming development of our new models, where the compact and light nuclear warheads, the vaunted Western intelligence, are based on, they did not slap, but in , and the weapon of the Apocalypse is supposedly not yet ready for the Great Russians (so far, in all probability ) And Kiriyenko got his Hero for something (in all likelihood ).

[Yuyuka]

And even if she crashed into the Barents Sea

Actually, there is a misprint - correctly "in the Belarusian Sea"

[Thrall]

Quote: Yuyuka

And even if she crashed into the Barents Sea

Actually, there is a misprint - correctly "in the Belarusian Sea"

Damn, that’s why I eat, as usual, pancakes from freshly caught shrimps, and for some reason they glow

[Yuyuka]

Damn, that’s why I eat, as usual, pancakes from freshly caught shrimps, and for some reason they glow

so here you are ... a bright man ....

[Roma 1977]

Hiley Likely, Barents mother was a Belarusian. And if we assume that Belarusians consider their nationality by mother, then ...

[SSR]

Quote: For example

Quote: Reptiloid

Yes, this is an occasion for another cut !!!!!!!

My dear, you urgently need to see a doctor! Otherwise, you will be sawn

And the rocket could well find shelter in the sea. That's the test. Not all first launches are successful. As a result, it will fly and fly as it should!

But you must admit, well, not in the Barents Sea.
Just what the publication writes -

According to CNBC, we are talking about the “search area” in the Barents Sea.

about this region ..... damn nonsense! Type Russia is testing a nuclear power plant among European countries !!!
Throwing in a horror story, we have places less populated and away from the "partners".

[Reptiloid]

Quote: maxim947

Cut it again ... some kind of obsession ....

And you do not remember how there --- look for who is profitable. Or --- if it is not clear what it is about — it is always about money. Our northern neighbors were looking for something there, they called large sums.

[maxim947]

I'm sorry, but you look like an old, grouchy grandmother at the entrance. There is no need to think over, and for the worse, it’s a pure provocation, trust our Armed forces, they will figure it out.

[Reptiloid]

And what is worse for us if the Americans are shortchanging themselves? How many fakes on their part? Not the first time already. They figured out how to write off money for this fake. The Russian threat is a significant expense item for various ministries. The increase of fear by themselves helps to increase American spending .. Here they tried with skripals ... What does the grandmother have to do with it, and why do you exclude self-interest from amers?

[maxim947]

So you're talking about the American cut ... You are many, including I just do not understand.

[Reptiloid]

Quote: maxim947

So you're talking about the American cut ... You are many, including I just do not understand.

Why is it incomprehensible? Who searches ---- he also saws. They present presentations! What did you mean?

[maxim947]

To saw, you need to organize a search, but how can they search for it in our waters of the Barents Sea? absurdity, so many people misunderstood you.

[Reptiloid]

Quote: maxim947

To saw, you need to organize a search, but how can they search for it in our waters of the Barents Sea? absurdity, so many people misunderstood you.

And in them, as in a joke - about a drunk who is looking for loss under a flashlight, where it is brighter. Look, the violinists were dragged by the ears too .... Something like this

[Reptiloid]

It is incomprehensible ---- I get minuses for writing about the American cut I supposed when searching for our rocket. Are the states themselves so good and silver-free have shown, directly ideal, that theft they can not even imagine ....

[Piramidon]

Quote: Reptiloid

It is incomprehensible ---- I get minuses for writing about the American cut I supposed when searching for our rocket. Are the states themselves so good and silver-free have shown, directly ideal, that theft they can not even imagine ....

How quickly you changed your shoes. After all, everyone who "minus" you is quite clear what "cut" and whom did you mean.

[Reptiloid]

Somehow I didn’t come across with you anywhere, it seems, was the registration a year ago, otherwise it wouldn’t have been "changed." In none of my comments have I ever scolded our military, either in the present or in the past tense. Amerov, EBN, tagged, maize, yes, I always scold. The more I learn about them, the more angry. Or was it you had a different nickname before What are you doing to me so at home ---- Dima?
I repeat once again --- to look for something that is not --- you can spend huge amounts of money, and a lot of time, and it already was, there are a lot of examples.

Quote: Piramidon

How quickly you changed your shoes.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Reptiloid

Yes, this is an occasion for another cut !!!!!!!

He put a little exclamation points, Dima. Have you rented your saw?

[Bar1]

Igor Ostretsov, professor, doctor of technical sciences, who is engaged in research in the field of nuclear physics and nuclear energy, in the video is extremely skeptical about the president’s statements. He believes that it’s technically impossible to make a supersonic rocket capable of operating at low altitudes.

this is called a lie on a lie. One began to lie, the rest behind him, scribbling with his tongues.

[Opera]

American intelligence believes with a sufficient degree of probability that it can very accurately be very likely probably somewhere in the sea ... The sea is being specified!

[sogdy]

Quote: Bar1

Igor Ostretsov

Ostretsov Igor Nikolaevich (born February 19, 1939) - doctor of technical sciences, professor, specialist in nuclear physics and atomic energy. Author of the monograph "Introduction to the philosophy of non-violent development"
So strange man, huh? By the way, I did not find a doctorate. All links to liberoids and our American Minister.

Quote: Bar1

He believes that it’s technically impossible to make a supersonic rocket capable of operating at low altitudes.

Nicho, that this is not his area of ​​erudition? Finally.

Quote: Bar1

this is called a lie on a lie. One began to lie, the rest behind him, scribbling with his tongues.

And here you should clarify from what point your countdown begins. So that it becomes clear to us what you personally wanted to say.

[Vol4ara]

Where is the rebuttal from the MO?

[sogdy]

Quote: Vol4ara

Where is the rebuttal from the MO?

But why?
The humor is that nobody knows what the Americans have called the "nuclear engine." I think they are waiting for the development of events.

[venik]

Quote: LeonidL

Fairy tales of the Viennese forest are good in the performance of professional artists, and not amateur drummers.

=====
You mean the comments from "National Intertst" ..... So look for something GREATER !!!!
And you can shove your "National Intertst" into yourself ...... (Well YES !!! Exactly There !!!)

[ANCIENT]

As I understand it, this is a new round of the information war against Russia! That is, the mind of Sscha doesn’t have enough to create something like this, the toad strangles what we have and flies, and here goes the usual lie in the move! Would people be normal, or a civilized country, and so-usa-that’s it!

[Sarmat Sanych]

Again mattress infantiles gush with ideas. Well, I won’t know - from whom they picked up this infection, from the Sumerians chtoli? Do not worry, the striped-eared, everything is in our stock and it works clearly. Yes, you yourself know this, you simply link to compote, and from this you compose fables.

[Cube123]

Quote: Sarmat Sanych

Well, I won’t know - from whom they picked up this infection, from the Sumerians chtoli?

These are the Sumerians from them. Quote from Noam Chomsky (Nobel laureate) "How the World Works" on US activities in Latin America in the 50s:
“Another problem that these secret documents persistently point out is the excessive liberalism of third world countries. (This problem is especially characteristic of Latin America, where governments were not very concerned about the control of thought activity and restrictions on foreign travel and where legal systems were so imperfect that they required evidence as a condition for prosecution.) "

[Sarmat Sanych]

Chomsky is a rare cynic and a bastard, but actually an interesting comrade. I read one of his work, rather amusing.

[Nikolay Fedorov]

Quote: Sarmat Sanych

Again mattress infantiles gush with ideas. Well, I won’t know - from whom they picked up this infection, from the Sumerians chtoli? Do not worry, the striped-eared, everything is in our stock and it works clearly. Yes, you yourself know this, you simply link to compote, and from this you compose fables.

It’s just that the Americans don’t yet know that the Russians didn’t test a rocket with a nuclear engine (this has been tested for a long time and everything works), but a flying-floating object with a nuclear engine. When they find out, they will not only put in compote, but also poop ...

[rotmistr60]

American CNBC Channel, Citing US Intelligence

The media constantly refer to intelligence, the FBI, or the Ministry of Defense. One gets the impression that American intelligence works exclusively for the media, immediately passing on "information" to them, and not to the president in the first place. Over the past year (you can not even talk about the previous ones), the American and British media have released so much "truthful" information about Russia that they have no desire to believe anything for a long time.

[bessmertniy]

The main thing is that the United States thus recognizes that we have nuclear-powered rockets that can fly. And the fact that they fall is pure evil of their evil sarcasm.

[cariperpaint]

Intelligence Limpop- Yesterday, the Zambezi army tested a gopher-fighting robot.

[Sarmat Sanych]

Uganda air defense shot down a cockatoo

[nikolas 83]

Just the beginning. Information war. In the following articles, it will be thrown that Sarmat does not fly, Iskander does not shoot, Armata does not go, and nothing at all. The mattresses are complacent.

[afrikanez]

I'd like to ask this intelligence: tell me honestly, who shot down the MH17?

[udincev]

Quote: afrikanez

tell me honestly, who shot down the MH17?

They have already said "probably could have been, undoubtedly according to irrefutable evidence from social networks ...", but about "honestly" at the wrong address (they just don't have such a concept).
So this question is not addressed.

[sleeve]

And Russia also broke off diplomatic relations with the Jedi Order, about the same thing on the same channel.
Although if, for example, we assume that there is at least a grain of truth, then a noble racket was bungled. When falling into the sea, there was no destruction of the reactor unit ?! Well, this is generally a specific wunderwaffe with the prospects of an aircraft engine. After all, if this "imperfection" hit the water with normal diligence, the whole world would already be screaming about an increase in the background in the Arctic, which is simply inevitable. And the process of infection is impossible only if the integrity of the poison is preserved, well, or some kind of hyper-safety protocols, where the stability of the remote control crankcase is comparable to the warheads of special warheads.
But something suggests that all the same "Jedi" ...

[g1washntwn]

The rocket, allegedly, did not fly 35 km.

And a year and a half to prepare an expedition to where the oars can be reached?
The maximum level of degradation of brain activity is either in the US intelligence, or in the American mass media, but most likely by everyone. Because some people come up with nonsense, others write it, and still others believe in it.

[123456789]

US Intelligence: A nuclear-powered rocket of the Russian Federation fell into the Barents Sea

the dog barks - the wind wears, and the caravan is coming!
It was just a two-medium missile torpedo Petrel / Poseidon and she did not care where to fly: in the water or in the air. Having fallen in the Barents Sea, she continued to test under water and took a position off the east / west coast ...

[123456789]

Quote: 123456789

and took a position off the east / west coast ...

waiting for hour X

[pafegosoff]

I don’t understand, but she was supposed to fall in Washington?

[PSih2097]

Quote: pafegosoff

I don’t understand, but she was supposed to fall in Washington?

not, as a test for a government bunker in colorado ...

[Mountain shooter]

However. Already, all the starts counted. And all launches were recognized unsuccessful ... And even the place of the fall was determined. And they learned that this is a nuclear missile (with a nuclear engine). And they changed their shoes in a jump - after all, they previously wrote that the creation of such a rocket is impossible

[Krasnoyarsk]

= It demonstrated an unlimited range missile system with a nuclear power plant. =
To be fair, it did not show the "missile system ...."
The cartoon cannot be considered a "demonstration". But this is not important. It is important that mattress intelligence in the company with mattress media believed it

[iv_ru]

Strange somehow all this! More recently, before shit, they proved that they were all cartoons, and now it’s like that! And doesn’t bother anything!

[LVMI1980]

"Most likely" they got me ..

[BAI]

The most important thing in the "news" is that the nuclear power plant is not fiction. Everything else can be discarded.

[Turgon]

Normal working out, while everything and everyone falls.

[PlotnikoffDD]

So all the same does it exist ????
Recently, they were shouting that the Russians did not have any missiles and the Darkest fakes fussed !!!!

[Faceless]

They don’t know what muck about us to come up with ...

[aries2200]

maybe they let that 30 km fly by .. study the start mode

[Alexey-74]

The American scouts had some fun ..... throw tests, unsuccessful launches, and so on. - this is the usual work of developers, I wonder how many successful launches they did not record ... but they caught up with the importance of their intelligence ... here's a good ..... s ("Brother-2) .....

[SASHA OLD]

something hardly believes in the very fact of testing a rocket with a nuclear power plant in this region - a screech would have stood from the very beginning from Europe

[Leonid Har]

Most likely, American intelligence swallowed the bait thrown by the FSB counterintelligence. It is possible that he is on a false trail.

[Prjanik]

But what about "Putin's cartoons" You already decide there, gentlemen, intelligence officers, otherwise your statements are somehow difficult to suspect of adequacy, yesterday-cartoons, today-experienced, tomorrow- .. what?

[sabakina]

It seems to me that all this is nonsense. No sane person would test the latest missile over the sea. For, as one movie hero said in the film "In the special attention zone:" Listen, let's bury it on the shore, otherwise we will not get our heads around. "

[Old26]

Well, the fact that unsuccessful trials - there is nothing wrong with that, if successful ones continue. It is rare that a weapon system has had all the successful trials. The question is, that she does not fly yet ...

Quote: Polite Elk

Yes, if this were true, at least by 10%, there would be the entire American fleet in the area of ​​the fall, yes, there would be a fleet there, they would look for them from air mattresses day and night.

Not a fact, Alexander, not a fact. The fact that the rocket flew 35 km (let us leave this figure) does not mean that it flew 35 km into the sea. Most likely the test launches were somewhere in the vicinity of Mityushikha Bay (at the southern tip of the North Island). When launched strictly north 35 km, the mark will be somewhere at a distance of 5-10 km from the coast, that is, in our territorial waters ...

Quote: hrych

it could not (in all likelihood) fly an unfortunate 35 km, if we know from the presentation that the launch is carried out from a ground installation

Elementary Watson. A little higher I wrote Comrade Polite Elk from where they could let me go. All nuclear was tested on the North Island. Therefore, it will be elementary from the region of Mityushikha Bay ...

Quote: ANCIENT

As I understand it, this is a new round of the information war against Russia! That is, the mind of Sscha doesn’t have enough to create something like this, the toad strangles what we have and flies, and here goes the usual lie in the move! Would people be normal, or a civilized country, and so-usa-that’s it!

The question is different, dear Sergey Vitalievich. AND NAFIGA SHE NEEDS, is this weapon system? For what? Did someone ask this question? In theory, they can build something similar. Project Pluto in the late 50s was theirs, not ours. But what's the point in such a rocket? Especially when she, as they begin to broadcast, will fly indefinitely, bypassing the air defense-missile defense zones? I wonder how this will happen? Or relying on the electorate who does not start asking uncomfortable questions ???

[Zaurbek]

I remember some time ago the American and Norwegian intelligence found some isotopes in the air .... not from this missile?

[Victorio]

maximum depth up to 600 (average 222 m), you can raise

[Old26]

Quote: voyaka uh

Scout satellites are circling us all the time. What is the problem of tracking trials?

The problem, Alexey, is that every structure that works in the military-industrial complex has documentation on the satellite situation. And during the passage of the satellite, all activity stops if necessary. Let me give you an example. in the city of N there is a design bureau that works closely ... well, for example, with the Cosmonaut Training Center. For example, the Soyuz lander is brought to this design bureau for work. It is necessary to unload it from a tilt truck and place it in one of the premises of this design bureau, which, according to the "legend," generally has no relation to the CTC. And the adversary, in principle, knows about this KB. So, what is next. Does this truck come to the territory of the design bureau and a team of loaders-engineers remove it from the body and turn it into the room? Yes, but only this is done at a time when there is a "window" between the flights of the reconnaissance satellites ...
So it is with tests. They are all held during the "windows". And this is not only the practice of Russia (USSR). This is a ubiquitous practice all over the world. Why give additional information to enemy intelligence. So tracking satellite tests is extremely difficult. Moreover, there are not so many of them that they "constantly circled overhead"

[Filxnumx]

I remember that Colin Powell was shaking something in front of the whole world and claimed that "intelligence reported exactly." But in fact - a donut hole. Here, as with diplomats, it looks like if he says "Yes" it means "maybe", if he says "maybe" it means "No"

[flicker]

US Intelligence: A nuclear-powered rocket of the Russian Federation fell into the Barents Sea

Either cartoons, then fell into the Barents Sea ...

[Old26]

Quote: voyaka uh

Intelligence satellites fly not everywhere, but over test sites. Polygons. These places are famous. And test times are becoming known for the increased activity of technology in front of them. Satellites fly in the same orbit one after another - several - so as to capture evenly all day.
The video comes with breaks, but small. These are trivial facts, nothing new.

Sorry, Alex, but you froze stupidity by writing this post

Quote: voyaka uh

Intelligence satellites fly not everywhere, but over test sites. Polygons. These places are famous. .

Satellites fly everywhere. The satellite’s orbit is constructed so that, depending on the orbit’s height, angle of inclination, and orbital period, it makes up to 17 revolutions around the earth per day, each time shifting more than 2000 km from the previous passage. In general, optical reconnaissance satellites pass over the same area no more than 2 times a day.

Quote: voyaka uh

And test times are becoming known for the increased activity of technology in front of them.

Test time is NOT KNOWN. By increasing the activity, we can only conclude that it will be. No more

Quote: voyaka uh

Satellites fly in the same orbit one after another - several - so as to capture evenly all day ..

Orbital parameters may be close, but this does not mean that there will be a dozen satellites in the same orbit. "Keyholes" fly in pairs, but even then at intervals of several hours. And there are only TWO such pairs. Of course, you can use Earth remote sensing satellites as preliminary sources, but there are not dozens of them, but only a few .. Therefore, they do not cover the whole day evenly. To do this, you need to launch several dozen of them, and to view them with an interval of 15-20 minutes - generally about two hundred ...

Quote: voyaka uh

The video comes with breaks, but small. These are trivial facts, nothing new.

No video. There is either a shooting strip at low resolution or frame-by-frame shooting of squares of about 2x3 km with detailed. And this is now, despite the fact that the satellites of the opto-electronic reconnaissance "write" nge on photographic film, and on the storage device and after certain periods of time "drop" these data packets to the Center. These are the trivial facts.

[Karislav]

Well, if there are tests, then there are drops of missiles with a nuclear installation, then the environment is littering. 2 * 2 = 4 ... everything is simple .. everything is simple ... what is there to rub off. and say that nothing has fallen anywhere ...

[Rusj]

Wow, I don’t understand! When we close this madhouse. How much can you endure it.

[Old26]

Quote: Karislav

Well, if there are tests, then there are drops of missiles with a nuclear installation, then the environment is littering. 2 * 2 = 4 ... everything is simple .. everything is simple ... what is there to rub off. and say that nothing has fallen anywhere ...

Quite right. The first tests tell nothing. That's why they are LKI, to work out the product. Especially if there are successful launches later. And failures on tests are quite normal. Take the same well-known our ICBM "Voyevoda". During flight design tests, more than a third of the launches were unsuccessful (out of 26 launches, 7 were unsuccessful). ... And so you can walk over everything. Both ours and American (French)