From Russia, only the "Eagles". National Interest compiled a new rating

34
The notorious American edition of National Interest has made another rating, this time the most powerful combat surface ships of the world and included the Soviet rocket cruisers of the 144 "Orlan" project.

From Russia, only the "Eagles". National Interest compiled a new rating




As the newspaper writes, the Soviet missile cruisers of the Orlan project are fast and powerful ships designed to destroy American aircraft carriers that "threaten Russian submarines and the territory of the country." The ships, according to the authors of the rating, are armed with Granit anti-ship missiles with nuclear warheads.

In total, four missile cruisers of the Orlan project, Admiral Ushakov, Admiral Lazarev, Admiral Nakhimov and Peter the Great, were built in the Soviet Union from 1973 to 1989. Currently, only Peter the Great is in service, being the flagship of the North fleet. The second ship of the Admiral Nakhimov project is currently in the process of modernization.

From the United States, Ticonderoga type missile cruisers and Arleigh Burk type destroyers are included in the ranking. The ships of these classes are distinguished by the multifunctional combat information and control system "Aegis" with various types of missiles used.

The expert calls the Congo-type battleships the most powerful Japanese ships. According to Mizokami, this is almost an exact replica of the American Arly Burk type combat ships.

Japan presented the Congo class battleships, which "thanks to the existing SM-3 missiles can protect the entire country from ballistic missile attacks", and China - the promising destroyers of the 055 project, which will become the largest ships of this class after the US Zumvalt.

Other countries, according to the compilers of the rating, apparently, do not possess the most powerful surface ships.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    20 August 2018 14: 02
    What damn battleships do the Japanese have now? Why did you write this? Maybe destroyers? ?? Forward the text, or explain the written! !!!!!!!
    1. +19
      20 August 2018 14: 10
      Portuguese armadillos are not undeservedly mentioned in the article smile
      1. +3
        20 August 2018 15: 24
        Quote: ANCIENT
        What damn battleships do the Japanese have now? Why did you write this? Maybe destroyers? ?? Forward the text, or explain the written! !!!!!!!



        No, it's just "highley like" - the new standard of journalism,
        type, ship - oh well

    2. +8
      20 August 2018 14: 16
      Quote: ANCIENT
      What damn battleships do the Japanese have now? Why did you write this? Maybe destroyers? ?? Forward the text, or explain the written! !!!!!!!

      On Wiki, they are called Torpedo Squadrons, but apparently, there isn’t enough time for such (trifle) ......)))
    3. +3
      20 August 2018 15: 01
      Well, it seems that the Japanese are now trending full-fledged anti-submarine helicopter carriers of aircraft carrier architecture. It is understandable - territorial disputes and claims.
    4. +2
      20 August 2018 18: 23
      Happenes. The author confused the battlecruisers "Congo" with destroyers. By the way, the inclusion of this statistic, along with cruisers and destroyers, seems to me not entirely correct. Why didn’t they include pr. 1164?
  2. +13
    20 August 2018 14: 03
    Understood nothing..
    From the United States, the Ticonderoga-class missile cruisers and Arlie Burke-class destroyers"..........
    .... The expert calls the most powerful Japanese ships battleships of the "Congo" class. According to Mizokami, it's almost accurate a copy of the American warships of the "Arleigh Burke" type.
    How battleship can be a copy of the destroyer ... Experts explain, otherwise it will blow the roof ... sad
    1. +6
      20 August 2018 14: 07
      Kolya, my respect! hi
      Quote: Nikolai Nikolaevich
      How battleship can be a copy of the destroyer ... Experts explain, otherwise it will blow the roof ...

      I'm not an expert, but it's about how to compare square with soft. Well, or crushed powder with phosgene.
      1. +12
        20 August 2018 14: 18
        The author confused the old, now deceased battleships of the Congo class with the Congo class URO destroyers. And those and others, 4 pcs. Destroyers URO type "Congo" (perhaps they are copies of Arly Berkov) are now in service (Congo, Kirishima, Meko, Tekai). The last Congo-class battleship was sunk in July 1945.
      2. +4
        20 August 2018 14: 27
        Paul hi I just thought, maybe I don’t know what in the nuances ... request I believe the author wanted to make the idea that they are similar in armaments ... and understands the fleet even worse than me ... smile
        multifunctional combat information and control system "Aegis" with various types of missiles used.
        Well, I don’t feel confident enough in naval matters ... request
    2. +4
      20 August 2018 14: 07
      Well, actually, the Japanese had a battle cruiser Congo built 1925 year and what kind of battleship I do not know
      1. +2
        20 August 2018 14: 51
        Quote: Graz
        Well, actually, the Japanese had a battle cruiser Congo built 1925 year and what kind of battleship I do not know


        These battlecruisers laid before the WWII. The last ship in the series went into operation in 1915.
      2. +1
        20 August 2018 18: 24
        In fact, the Congo was built in England in 1913.
      3. +1
        20 August 2018 19: 35
        Quote: Graz
        Well, actually, the Japanese had a battle cruiser Congo built 1925 year and what kind of battleship I do not know

        LK "Congo" - this is the same LKR "Congo" after the modernization of the early 30s: replacement of boilers, strengthening of armor protection, installation of PTZ, increase in the HVR of the main guns. True, the resulting ship was a battleship except in name - which was proved by the meeting of "Kirishima" with "Washington" and "Sodak".
  3. +3
    20 August 2018 14: 06
    Sorry I do not see the author's photo! laughing
    1. 0
      20 August 2018 14: 12
      Want a face monitor on a table? laughing Pity the monitor ...
  4. +2
    20 August 2018 14: 30
    The author does not care whether the battleship of the beginning of the century or the destroyer of the end of the century))
  5. +3
    20 August 2018 14: 43
    Congo-class battleships

    Probably the destroyer is meant, because there are no active battleships, absolutely. request Yes
  6. +2
    20 August 2018 14: 49
    The expert calls the Congo-type battleships the most powerful Japanese ships. According to Mizokami, this is almost an exact replica of the American Arly Burk type combat ships.

    Japan was presented with the Congo-class battleships, which "thanks to the existing SM-3 missiles, can protect the entire territory of the country from a ballistic missile strike"


    It would be interesting to know what potent drugs the author of this article took before writing this article? Why are you even allowed to publish such "articles"?
  7. +4
    20 August 2018 15: 07
    The Japanese are able to make ships ... 70 years since the last such battleship was drowned, and he launches all the rockets, and the most modern ones. Well, nothing, we will incite our combat Buryats and mountain landing troops against them ... And of course, the Altai armored militia (s)
  8. +2
    20 August 2018 15: 12
    The glory of the USSR still thunders. Eagles are more likely not Russian but Soviet. And all that Russia did was ditch "Admiral Lazarev" but at least she was smart enough to save Peter the Great and put Admiral Nakhimov for repairs
  9. +1
    20 August 2018 15: 55
    ... Japan was presented with the Congo-class battleships, which "thanks to the available SM-3 missiles, can protect the entire territory of the country

    ... The author must have gone too far with battleships ... recourse
    ... The Kongou class missile destroyer is a modified version of the US Navy Arleigh Burke class destroyer. The destroyer is armed:
    Radar weapons AN / SPY-1 radar
    Tactical strike weapons 2 UVP Mk-41 VLS for 29 (bow) and 61 (stern) cells
    Artillery 1x127mm/62 Oto-Breda Compact Gun mod. 2
    Anti-aircraft artillery 2x20mm Mark 15 Phalanx CIWS
    Rocket armament 8хRGM-84 Harpoon SSM
    SM-2MR Standard SAM
    ASROC anti-submarine weapons,
    Mine-torpedo armament 2x3 TA (6 torpedoes)
    Aviation group 1 helicopter
    Jds ​​Kongo (DDG-173)
    JDS Kirishima (DDG-174)
    JDS Myoko (DDG-175)
    JDS Chokai (DDG-176) ... hi
  10. +1
    20 August 2018 16: 19
    Why all the author of this article ran into.
    Original on https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/5-most-deadly-naval-surface-ships-planet-earth-29142
    It is written:
    Kongo-class guided missile destroyer
    But the entire Russian segment of the Internet writes about the battleships of Congo. It's just that no one bothers reading the original but retypes the finished one. Who was the first to make a mistake who actually read NI - and the error went on all sites with lazy newsletters.
    1. +1
      20 August 2018 22: 50
      Quote: kit88
      Who was the first to make a mistake who actually read NI - and the error went on all sites with lazy newsletters.

      Yes, this is a fairly common topic.
      Quote: kit88
      It's just that no one bothers reading the original but retypes the finished one.

      Yes, why the original, pampering is ... time to lose more ... laughing Well, as it turned out once again, those with eyes saw everything. Yes Damn it, I’m sure that many (at heart) experienced some disappointment from the fact that the battleships, after all, are no longer and are not expected. crying laughing
  11. BAI
    +1
    20 August 2018 16: 24
    Where is the title of the article? Can't find it on NI. Congo-class battleships (cruisers) are 4 pre-war ships! (WWII). What is written here?
    There are destroyers, but these are not battleships.
  12. -2
    20 August 2018 17: 36
    It is strange that Atlanta, Ustinov, for example, did not enter.
    And their Berks cannot do anything with our frigate 22350 Gorshkov. Not an offset.
  13. +1
    20 August 2018 18: 06
    Quote: Tektor
    It is strange that Atlanta, Ustinov, for example, did not enter.
    And their Berks cannot do anything with our frigate 22350 Gorshkov. Not an offset.

    Have you decided to grumble? The frigate has just entered the combat composition of the fleet, misunderstandings with the Polyment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system. the number of slots for percussion weapons is negligible in comparison with the Burk, and you are already shrinking ...
    “Atlanta” is really incomprehensible why they did not get into the rating (according to our translation), although most likely by the totality of characteristics.
    1. -1
      20 August 2018 19: 26
      Quote: Old26
      The frigate has just entered the combat composition of the fleet, misunderstandings with the Polyment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system.

      what misunderstandings? - it does not work yet ((
  14. 0
    20 August 2018 18: 55
    Congo-class battleships? The last of these, "Haruna", was sunk in 1945. Zombie ships ...
    1. +3
      20 August 2018 19: 39
      Quote: ZAV69
      Congo-class battleships? The last of these, "Haruna", was sunk in 1945. Zombie ships ...

      Right now Congo has become insulted. smile
  15. +1
    20 August 2018 21: 14
    battleships of the "Congo" class, which "thanks to the available SM-3 missiles can protect the entire territory of the country from a ballistic missile strike"
    what kind of nonsense is this? Japan, it turns out, are still exploiting battleships? feel They have such destroyers, yes, an analogue of "Burks"
  16. +1
    20 August 2018 21: 57
    Article from the series: "Who is stronger than a whale or an elephant?"
    Complete nonsense and thrash!
  17. -1
    21 August 2018 01: 52
    "The expert calls the battleships of the Congo type the most powerful Japanese ships." .... it is almost an exact copy of the American URO destroyers of the Arleigh Burke class. Battleship - copy of a destroyer ???? Well, the author bent!
  18. 0
    21 August 2018 19: 41
    N-ya ... Powerful text. I bring it to the ranking of the strongest texts in the world.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"