The Defense Ministry is ready to conclude a new contract for the supply of Su-30CM

42
The Russian Defense Ministry has announced plans to conclude a new contract for the supply of the Su-30CM fighter jets to the Russian Federation Air Force. Under the new treaty, at the end of 2018, the military may purchase at least 36 Su-30CM fighters. The total cost of the three-year contract will be about 70 billion rubles.

The Defense Ministry is ready to conclude a new contract for the supply of Su-30CM




Since 2012, the Ministry of Defense has signed contracts for the supply of 116 Su-30SM fighters, of which 88 are ordered for the VKS and 28 for the sea aviation Navy. Deliveries are calculated until the end of 2018.

Earlier it was reported that the United Aircraft Corporation expects to conclude with the Russian Defense Ministry a new contract for the supply of Su-30CM multi-purpose fighters. The head of the corporation, Yuri Slyusar, announced plans to load the Irkutsk Aviation Plant, which produces the Su-30CM, at the level of producing 12-14 machines a year.

Su-30M is a double multipurpose fighter of the 4 ++ generation. Designed for the conquest of air superiority and the destruction of ground targets. It has super-maneuverability, is equipped with a radar with a phased antenna array, engines with thrust vector control and front horizontal tail. The combat load of the aircraft is 8 tons. It has 12 nodes for the suspension of a wide range of rocket-bomb weapons. In addition to the rocket-bomb armament, it is equipped with a gun GSH-30-1 caliber 30 mm.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    17 August 2018 15: 24
    read the article and did not understand whether or not the Ministry of Defense would conclude an agreement? ... "so pebbles or sand" Kh.F Gorko.
    1. +12
      17 August 2018 15: 31
      Will be. And this is probably not the last contract for Su 30. And for the VKS and the Navy.
    2. +7
      17 August 2018 15: 32
      Confirmed previously voiced by Slesaryuk. There will be a contract for 36 cars, the plant will be loaded again for 3 years. Fine. The price was a little embarrassing.
      1. +14
        17 August 2018 15: 42
        What exactly is wrong with the price? This, if roughly - $ 30 million per fighter. Given that we sold Su-35 for $ 80 million apiece for export, and about 50 million for the MiG-35 (MiG-29 with indexes, modernized export, in general), it seems more than adequate. And if you look at how much Western fighter jets cost - generally fire)
        1. +1
          17 August 2018 18: 32
          Quote: Faceless
          Given the fact that we were selling Su-35 for $ 80 million apiece for export

          100 million dollars apiece. True, it is not clear with what weight (engines, rockets. Zip, simulators)
        2. 0
          17 August 2018 20: 39
          It’s not comparable with Western ones, yes. Below answered for the price, still there are hangars (dreamily laughing )
      2. +1
        17 August 2018 15: 43
        Quote: Orkraider
        Confirmed previously voiced by Slesaryuk. There will be a contract for 36 cars, the plant will be loaded again for 3 years. Fine. The price was a little embarrassing.

        I was confused that the plant would be loaded for three years ...
        This is not the right figure for loading enterprises, including assembly production.
        1. +3
          17 August 2018 20: 24
          Earlier they wrote that before the age of 22, the plant needs a contract for up to 100 cars (export and its own thirty), so that without consequences (loss-making) go to the production of MS-21. Not yet, but .. I think everything will turn out, we just do not have all the information.
      3. +1
        17 August 2018 15: 43
        Quote: Orkraider
        The price was a little embarrassing.

        And what is wrong? Everything seems to be alright
        1. +2
          17 August 2018 20: 18
          The fact that the price has not changed from the previous contract, which is already many years old. This surprised me)) in a good sense of surprise drinks
          1. 0
            18 August 2018 15: 07
            Quote: Orkraider
            The fact that the price has not changed from the previous contract, which is already many years old. This surprised me))

            I understand you :)))) hi
            But here it is - the fulfillment of the last contract was prescribed for 2018 for a year, and the military has it - there is a base price for the product, it increases by the percentage of official inflation. data. Therefore, contracts close in terms will not differ significantly in value, even if in fact the cost of production has increased. drinks
  2. 0
    17 August 2018 15: 25
    If so, then good! good New army aircraft are very necessary! good soldier
  3. +3
    17 August 2018 15: 32
    It would be better to buy a SU-57 .. And then the rubber will be stretched and it will become obsolete ..
    1. +1
      17 August 2018 21: 24
      Or at least a Su-35.
      1. +2
        17 August 2018 23: 06
        Or at least a Su-35.
        We are glad that 30 are buying, and not just one modernization is costing 27. At least
        1. 0
          18 August 2018 23: 54
          So it is necessary after all of both those and others and the third ...
  4. +5
    17 August 2018 15: 42
    One sad thing: 12-14 cars a year. This is 1400 for a hundred years what
    1. +2
      17 August 2018 16: 00
      Quote: igorbrsv
      One sad thing: 12-14 cars a year. This is 1400 for a hundred years what

      In addition to them, in the VKS we also receive Su-35С fighters, we are upgrading the Su-27. And there is also the MiG family, namely the MiG-29, MiG-31 and now also the MiG-35. I don’t take into account Su-57 since we are waiting for it with engines of the second stage.

      As for this order, it’s not enough to have ready-made aircraft. You need to have an abundance of trained pilots and technicians. And we do not forget these planes only for ourselves - and they are also produced for export. So not so little.
    2. 0
      17 August 2018 16: 13
      Dreaming is not harmful - GDP spoke for 700 information security for VKS. And this is including other aircraft (Su-35, MiG-35, Su-57, Su-34). hi
    3. +2
      17 August 2018 16: 21
      We had a period when one plant produced 28 combat aircraft per week. I hope that the circumstances that prompted such a production will never be repeated. But then it was proved to the whole world that the USSR is capable of total mobilization.
      If necessary, we will increase issues by orders of magnitude. But what to do with so much in peacetime? .. So I see no reason for sadness.
      1. +3
        17 August 2018 18: 29
        Quote: Faceless
        If necessary - increase issues by orders of magnitude

        Quote: Faceless
        We had a period when one plant produced 28 combat aircraft per week

        it's all in the past. Modern technology is not at all like stamping it like hot cakes. This is not a Yak-9 or La-5.
        Quote: Faceless
        But what to do with so much in peacetime?

        ha, do you think that planes don’t do it because there is no need for them? (I’ll tell you a terrible, terrible secret - they don’t do it because: 1) there is no money, and 2) all the capacities of the plants are occupied, including by foreign orders) Do you know when the war breaks out, it will be too late to do. You take into account that planes do not forgive, thank God, as in the 90s, but fly, knocking out a resource? Do you have any problems with the technical side of the matter, without emotions?
  5. +1
    17 August 2018 16: 03
    Su-30 would still deliver AFAR, new engines and a little work on EPR would be all. the truth is already a cool upgrade. why then do not order su-35? or just to keep the plant in good shape? sort of like the Su-35 in Komsomolsk do, and the 30th on Irkut?
    1. +3
      17 August 2018 18: 28
      The novel is most likely a matter of price. hi
    2. -1
      17 August 2018 20: 48
      Yes, the normal potential of the Su-30, just when upgrading you need to make the same glider with units with the Su-35S (except for the cockpit) and discontinue the 34th ....
      1. NKT
        -1
        17 August 2018 23: 28
        Why take 34 off?
        1. 0
          18 August 2018 07: 14
          To produce more than 30x, following the example of Hindus with a Su30MKI with an aiming container, it will completely replace 34ku .... there will be a more flexible fleet of cars.
          1. +2
            20 August 2018 09: 19
            Alas, I do not agree. it would be better to choose between 30cm and 35s, and 34 do not touch at all. Yet the car is unique. At this stage, in the same Syria, all the advantages of 34 are not disclosed, but if we talk about the global war, for which our army should be ready in the first place, then 34 with its unique cabin is simply obliged to be in the troops.
            1. 0
              20 August 2018 11: 02
              CITIZENS !!! Well, what are you hooked on the Su-35S and Su-30SM.
              Understand one thing, the Su-35S is a DOG FIGHT machine, and the Su-30SM is a multifunctional machine. A typical situation: the bearded, possessing weak air defense systems, such as MANPADS and heavy machine guns, guard the object. The task for the videoconferencing is to destroy the object. Reconnaissance conducted - spotted approximate enemy firepower. Understood - that the Rooks would fall under fire from the ground. And here the difference in the operation of a single-seat and two-seat vehicles will affect. Upon entering the zone, the Su-35S pilot will be forced to maneuver when leaving the fire from the ground and he will not be able to move the machine to the enemy’s target. In the same situation, the co-pilot of the Su-30SM will be able to carry out this work. And most likely from the first call they will put bombs or rockets in the Object. The fact that the Su-30SM can work through the air is its UNCERTAINTY PLUS, but this is not its main work as the Su-35S.
    3. 0
      18 August 2018 15: 55
      Because the current contract for Su-35 expires on 2020.
      1. 0
        20 August 2018 09: 19
        But how many total ordered the 35th?
  6. +3
    17 August 2018 16: 50
    Su-30SM is a double multi-functional fighter of generation 4 ++ ...
  7. -1
    17 August 2018 16: 58
    and there will be a zoo from different modifications of the Su-27. Why not switch to one glider with several modifications? Then there will be a bunch of versions of the MiG-35?
    1. +1
      17 August 2018 19: 00
      Su-30 double, Su-35 single, already the difference. And I'm personally not sure that their gliders are very different. What they really differ greatly in is avionics. Here they have much greater differences.
      1. -1
        17 August 2018 20: 50
        The glider is different and AL-41 engines with more traction .... ideally, you need to do a 2-seater Su-35C ...
        1. 0
          18 August 2018 16: 00
          Already 71 serial Su-35 in the army and somehow do without modification sparky. More precisely, they use Su-30. If there is a mass of Su-30 and the transition to the release of Su-57, which, like the F-22, does not need a spark, the development of a two-seater Su-35 looks like an action of non-obvious expediency. Simply, the Su-35 will be a purely military personnel, and the Su-30СМ will be gradually withdrawn from the military personnel, passing into the training for the Su-35.
  8. -2
    17 August 2018 18: 24
    The Defense Ministry is ready to conclude a new contract for the supply of Su-30CM
    just ready - conclude. What's the question? Where to get the money?
  9. +1
    17 August 2018 18: 35
    As a person in the subject, I will say that 12 aircraft is not enough to load.
    1. 0
      17 August 2018 20: 50
      And yet, more than 15-17 aircraft / year do not produce either Su34 or Su30 / 35 ...
    2. -1
      17 August 2018 21: 52
      Quote: Cottodraton
      12 aircraft is not enough to load

      so there is still a foreign order. They seem to do for Kazakhs. As far as monitoring reports, more than 20-24 aircraft per year never worked
  10. +1
    17 August 2018 19: 32
    Thirty is a good universal workhorse. The news is good, especially amid the start of litigation in the US over the rockfall at the Pentagon and the National Guard.
  11. +2
    18 August 2018 03: 47
    Quote: silver_roman
    Su-30 would still deliver AFAR, new engines and a little work on EPR would be all. the truth is already a cool upgrade. why then do not order su-35? or just to keep the plant in good shape? sort of like the Su-35 in Komsomolsk do, and the 30th on Irkut?

    Su-30 and Su-35 are slightly different from each other. Su-35 is a typical air fighter. His task is to gain superiority in the air. Su-30 in this regard is somewhat behind. But he acts as a good strike aircraft. It can strike from the air on ground, surface targets. Therefore, his cabin is double. So that the pilot during the strikes is not distracted from piloting.
  12. -1
    18 August 2018 16: 45
    You read such news and a vague thought wanders in your head, but what is more important for these - reliable defense of the country or grandmother from these contracts? I would like the first.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"