Is it easy to shoot down a quadrocopter from Kalash?

16
Due to numerous requests from its subscribers, the WarGonzo project decided to conduct a very interesting experiment: shoot down a copter. The film crew was prompted by the information that in almost all units of the RF Armed Forces, the military was obliged to learn how to shoot down Drones, which today are actively used in hostilities and pose a serious threat to the enemy.

Before the experiment, the project WarGonzo decided to listen to the opinion of a specialist who has real combat experience. The expert said that in the three years during which he had to fight, there were three hits: into the chamber, the blade and the battery. In this case, the drone did not receive serious damage. According to the expert, it is easier to remove such an aircraft using electronic warfare, rather than weapons. Hits from small arms are more likely an accident.



For the experiment, the presenter selected three types of weapons: a Makarov 9-mm pistol, AK (caliber 5.45) and AK (caliber 7.62). The film crew took the cheapest and simplest model of the aircraft costing 2-2,5 thousand rubles, which can be easily ordered online, as an object for destruction.

How will the crash test end and whether the lead manages to disable the kopter, you will learn if you look at the WarGonzo project “How to knock down the kopter from AK?”

  • Wargonzo
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    17 August 2018 09: 11
    Shotgun must be shot. laughing
    1. +2
      17 August 2018 09: 55
      you need to breed fighting ducks and geese, like the Romans to hunt for copters
      1. +2
        17 August 2018 18: 53
        Better fighting pelicans to capture them.
      2. 0
        18 August 2018 16: 36
        Quote: yehat
        you need to breed fighting ducks and geese, like the Romans to hunt for copters

        ingenious (not sarcasm)
  2. +7
    17 August 2018 18: 45
    In a clamped manner, with two hands clutching a gun tightly and thoroughly, aiming carefully, you can hardly get into a thrown tin can ?! smile Offhand, with one hand, better from the hip, you had to shoot from the "Makarov" to get into the copter!
    In the same way, it is difficult to hit a fast maneuvering target from the "Kalash", in such "tension", and even holding it not by the forend, but by the store (I was always surprised by those shooters who were not holding the AK and SVDshka by the forend).
    And, of course, you need to "grow together" with the weapon, feel it, then the shooting will be okay.
  3. +2
    17 August 2018 21: 57
    But what about trap shooting, like duck hunting? Although there are slightly less distances ...
    1. +3
      17 August 2018 23: 00
      Quote: Phoenix_Lvov
      But what about trap shooting, like duck hunting? Although there are slightly less distances ...

      hi Namely, Phoenix_Lvov, offhand, with single (even if not a "sheaf" of shot, like "ducks") shots of tracer bullets, with both eyes open (aiming at the presenter) and therefore observing the target stereoscopically, there is a chance to hit a small drone at 100-150m from "Kalash", especially from 5,45mm caliber. IMHO
      Although, "not only everyone" can do this (in shooting, the same features of the prevalence of a "slow" or "fast" nervous system are manifested as in, figuratively, distancers with sprinters in athletics, not all shooters are equally good at shooting offhand! ). winked
      Another thing is that the action of an all-shell bullet on a copter, as described in detail and shown in the video, is not very effective ?!
  4. +3
    18 August 2018 18: 26
    Does he want to scam a hundred meters from Pm? belay
    But!!! laughing
    Again, how much is a shooter to shoot down such aerial targets? He can not get into a chicken running around the yard from the machine.
    In general, the test, in my opinion, is not about anything. request
  5. +2
    18 August 2018 21: 01
    Has anyone fired at trap shooting? Well then, and can explain to you what it is
  6. +4
    19 August 2018 12: 56
    Empty Small combat drones today develop a speed close to 130 km / h and, when moving in a circle, cardioid or other closed figure, it is almost impossible to keep track of them. They programmatically do not fall below 45-50 meters. Accordingly, shotguns are useless here. The latest models and standard EW-means to crush is not easy, because moving not under the constant control of the operator - part of the route or fly-around of the object is performed in the autopilot mode according to the random algorithm. bully
    Attacking kamikaze drones generally fly at 150 km / h (42 m / sec) and "falling" in a straight line on the object do not leave him any chance. hi
    1. +3
      19 August 2018 14: 50
      Quote: A. Privalov
      Empty Small combat drones today develop a speed close to 130 km / h and, when moving in a circle, cardioid or other closed figure, it is almost impossible to keep track of them. They programmatically do not fall below 45-50 meters. Accordingly, shotguns are useless here. The latest models and standard EW-means to crush is not easy, because moving not under the constant control of the operator - part of the route or fly-around of the object is performed in the autopilot mode according to the random algorithm. bully
      Attacking kamikaze drones generally fly at 150 km / h (42 m / sec) and "falling" in a straight line on the object do not leave him any chance. hi

      hi And it is right! 100500! good
    2. +1
      21 August 2018 10: 27
      Quote: A. Privalov
      Attacking kamikaze drones generally fly at 150 km / h (42 m / sec) and "falling" in a straight line on the object do not leave him any chance.

      About ballistic missiles with a nuclear warhead, I'm sure, too, at first thought so. Then time passed and the thoughts vanished.
      It cannot be that this is an extremely invulnerable tracking system.
  7. +1
    21 August 2018 10: 11
    The idea of ​​knocking a copter out of a gunshot is tempting. But even more tempting is to use a copter to provoke the unmasking of a battle group - i.e. or visual detection by the camera (or IR) or audio detection. In the end, even if the copter is removed without a shot, the place where the copter disappeared is a place for close attention.
  8. +2
    2 September 2018 23: 06
    Does our site support the "War Gonzo" project? And why is the name so ...? For English speakers ...? Well .. Well ... This muff at close range will not hit the elephant .. He only has good grenades to throw in the aquarium. I am an opponent of this "project" as completely amateurish and even dangerous, including for the participants themselves, due to complete mediocrity and illiteracy in the range of issues in which they are trying to figure it out.
  9. 0
    15 September 2018 08: 21
    I apologize for bad manners - shoe firing on video, single at a flying vehicle - this is not at any gate. Example "Shilka" and AK-630. But you can try 8-gauge buckshot.
  10. 0
    15 September 2018 08: 21
    It all depends on the skill of the shooter ... In the state of not standing from the pistol, the master got into the thrown bottle fellow

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"