An interesting question, right? And really, if we talk about a certain theoretical (although it is very practical) lawlessness, which has a place to be in our army, then a very interesting situation emerges.
Yes, in the good old days, the army suffered from hazing, then fraternization was replaced by fraternities, then the service life was reduced to such an extent that there is simply no time left for dedovshchina, and fraternity does not bring bonuses.
By lawlessness, I mean somewhat not what everyone thought. And it’s not about taking money from the soldiers or causing bodily harm.
It will be completely about other things.
To begin with, I will immediately answer the question asked: who is the main line-up in the army? In my opinion, the main bespredelschiki can safely be called a conscript soldier and those who introduced the current form of control in the army.
Let's start from the bottom. With conscripts. Someone will immediately object to me that you, the author, forgot how the burning footcloths smell. Did not forget. But that was a long time ago and in fact was not true. Today, the alignment is completely different.
Having re-read the disciplinary charter, having thought well, I came to this conclusion. A conscript is such an organism to which all these statutes are not terrible at all. Especially in light of how the matter is set in the army now.
And it is not delivered. It is laid, lies, and in fact does not move. And there is no one to stir it, comrades officers are busy with more serious things. But about them a little later, but for now let's start with the charter.
Whoever does not remember, will refresh my memory. And at the same time I will comment on how serious each point is from my point of view (it is discussed, for it is not a dogma).
b) severe reprimand.
You understand that these reprimands are effective only in respect of those soldiers who have plans for the future to serve in various government agencies such as the Ministry of the Interior, the Federal Security Service, the FPS and others. Where the impeccable reputation and the corresponding characteristic will be necessary. Well 1% of the total. Even those who will sign a contract with the Ministry of Defense will not be saddened by these reprimands, since everything can be removed.
The rest is the case along the spine. A year to serve - and goodbye, or rather, goodbye.
c) the deprivation of another dismissal from the location of a military unit or from ship to shore.
Conditional punishment, frankly. We have so many places of permanent deployment, where there is no place to go stupidly, and in a heap of parts you should not (I launched a pebble towards the Caucasus) even to go outside the fence.
d) deprivation of the badge of the honors pupil.
Of course, there are amateur glitter collectors, but most of them lose their “reward” and simply suffer from such a loss.
e) warning about incomplete service compliance.
This is for contractors, conscripts, again, do not care.
e) reduction in the military post of the corporal (senior sailor) and sergeant (foremen);
g) a reduction in the military rank of the corporal (senior sailor) and sergeant (foreman);
h) a reduction in military rank with a decrease in the military post of corporal (senior sailor) and sergeant (sergeant).
Sounds, but in fact again fiction. First, for the year in the military service, you can grow a maximum to the junior sergeant. Well, just will not come higher jump in time.
In addition, an order signed by the unit commander is required for such a reduction. This is not very simple, let's talk about the problems with the higher authorities just below.
And again, mainly in the units, the sergeant staff is formed from conscripts. So again, by the box office.
and) early dismissal from military service due to non-compliance with the terms of the contract.
Again, it concerns only contractors.
j) disciplinary arrest.
Well, yes, seriously. Here it is clear what the guardhouse means. Let's say it wasn't the most lovely place on earth (I remember the only visit and I will remember for a long time), but ... also fiction!
"Lips" can grab as much as a whole month. But, proceeding from the letter of the statute prescribed in paragraph 94, “Disciplinary arrest is a last resort to disciplinary action and consists of keeping a soldier in isolation in the guardhouse.
Disciplinary arrest is applied to a soldier only in exceptional cases and only for a gross disciplinary offense committed by him. ”
We translate: to get under the action of this item, you have to try very hard. Very much.
But for those who are not too lazy to open the charter, in the paragraphs above, from 81 down, all actions that comrades commanders must perform in order to prevent the wounded soldier from being clearly described are clearly described.
Annex No. XXUMX to the statute contains a very detailed description of what is considered a gross disciplinary offense. However, the list of documents that must be completed and submitted to the military court in 7-day is also attached there.
Yes, yes, I'm not kidding. The times when the battalion commander (for three days with his power) and above could send to the “lip” had passed. Now only a court can impose a disciplinary arrest.
And now let's plunge into the skin of a modern officer, in whom the fighter has lost the banks and has done something. For example, I ran over the women or caught a patrol with the “invigorating” party. It is necessary to punish unequivocally. But ... The devil is in the details.
The commander of a serviceman must immediately report on this to the commander of a military unit in the prescribed manner. The commander of the unit must decide on the conduct of the proceedings and appoint a responsible person. Usually it is deputy. on radar (work with personnel).
And two unfortunate commander nakosyvshego, and deputy. on radar, they will all have to complete a full proceeding in order to submit to the court in writing. And, having considered the materials of the case, the commander may refer the case to court. All in accordance with the articles of the Federal Law "On the status of military personnel."
10 days are given for everything, including the commander of the 2 part of days for familiarization and reflection.
And then the court. And if the judge considers the offense proven, he decides on the appointment of the arrest. No, sorry…
True, it became completely incomprehensible to me that the candidate for prisoners would be doing these 10 days. If, according to my Soviet notions, then there will be 10 days of utter relaxation and buzz. The guard is impossible, in outfit, too, is doubtful. You can probably carry an ordinary service, but if not a self-propelled move, but damage to military equipment, for example?
And, the most interesting thing, you can rot anyone at home, and if the court does not consider it necessary to plant it? What then?
Or if during these days of 10, what is going on the investigation, will the fighter decide to rid himself of such a prospect and accomplish something useful, rehabilitating him?
Agree that the punishment is effective when it is timely and inevitable. But not in a state of vague prospects, they will either be punished (and in a military court, by the way, a lawyer is supposed to be, this is not a tribunal), or not. The way a lawyer turns things over is also a matter.
As a consultant drew a friend of Colonel Staver. So, the first (and last) that Comrade Colonel gave me, having familiarized myself with the situation, that the cleverest will rot not the mover of a gunman or a hand-wielded fighter spoiling the technique, but a company officer who cannot cope with the personnel.
Since there is no opportunity to curb the conscript lost the shores, there must be other methods to influence the situation. That is, on the immediate commander of a fighter.
But with this we are all right.
The company officer, whose fighters run into self-propelled guns, drag in alcohol, spoil equipment and behave inadequately in general, is a source of universal evil. Because he does not want to work normally. And then welcome to the same disciplinary charter, where everything is simply luxuriously painted.
There is just an incomplete service conformity (consider - down annual premium or 1010) and stuff like that. Officer punish just easier.
Therefore, I agree with Staver that in the process of wanting to indicatively punishing a fighter according to the disciplinary regulations, the company commander is unlikely to advance further than the battalion commander.
And why not?
And because the battalion commander is more experienced than the company commander. And he will try himself in the embryo to repay this completely unnecessary epic. The battalion commander cannot cope - the regiment can definitely. Just ryavknet on the company, in fact the case will end. Well, the promise to deprive the prize, since the company of the company could not cope with the soldier.
Again the question "why" arises.
Yes, because everyone, from the regiment to the commander, was not absorbed in the prospect of imitated accountability.
Indeed, it is one thing if private Ivanov incorrectly connected the wiring and burned the tank to hell. This is a violation, it is damage to equipment, it is a loss to the army and the country. It is necessary to fuck everyone, from Ivanov to the commander of the unit.
And it is quite another thing if the rodents penetrated inside the combat vehicle and gnawed the wiring, and she shorted out. And the tank burned down from short circuit.
No, it is also necessary to punish someone, for example, the head of the park, who does not catch mice. But agree, the difference in the two states of emergency is palpable.
Therefore, a similar reaction of the commanders is quite normal. The case that went to court will definitely spoil the reporting. For violations of discipline, for working with personnel. And, depending on how hard it is, they can be glued to the fullest. Kombrigu / divisional commander in the army headquarters, commander in the district headquarters.
The company company is unlikely to want to look like a couple of years like this post. A brigade commander, in turn, dreams of a higher position. And that's fine, that's all it is worth.
And here is the result. The system of disciplinary action is the opposite. Yes, arrest with content in the guardhouse is rarely used. Nobody wants to lose a prize or overstay.
As a result, the command of the units, it turns out, effectively prohibits lower-level commanders from carrying out official disciplinary punishments in order to please His Majesty the Report.
After all, the main thing is to report beautifully on the work done. And to make it look believable.
But how, then (still returning to the main topic) to influence the violators of discipline, if there is absolutely no leverage?
Phones do not issue? In the dismissal is not to let go? So the committees of mummies are just waiting for this. Although a normal company officer himself is well aware that a soldier who has gotten up with his relatives is less dangerous psychologically than is punished in this way.
Muzzle beat? Not serious, and is fraught with criminal proceedings against the officer. Punish (as often practiced before) all for one? This contradicts the article of the same disciplinary charter.
The result is not very pretty. The system of penalties for disciplinary offenses, except for extraordinary orders, is completely incompetent.
But this is not the saddest thing.
Today a system has developed in the Russian army, in which the picture in the reports is more important than the real state of affairs. And this is not the first year, as it were. Reports are written, kilograms of paper are spent on filling out useless forms, and to the detriment of what? That's right, to the detriment of the officers' daily work. After all, in the day of the entire 24 hour, and, if you do not grieve, no longer add.
So we write in the minus?
Full The main thing - the report. It is with a capital letter, because it is on the basis of reports that everything is decided in our army. And what is not included in the scope of a beautiful report should be ruthlessly removed.
How can you not remember the negative example of Captain Zolotarev, who wrote a bag of letters to Putin? And the positive example of Major Pugachev from the same division, who hunted down soldiers for the purpose of obtaining ransom from their relatives.
But Captain Zolotarev wrote letters poorly to the president, so they are trying with all his might to deprive him of everything and expel him from the army. And Major Pugachev, who beautifully wrote reports about how he worked great with the staff, even managed to go on the run. More precisely, he was given such an opportunity. For merits.
In general, the situation is not very. And unequivocally, she will not bring anything beautiful or pleasant. Neither conscripts on whom it is difficult to find justice, nor officers held in a framework in which many of us would hardly have wished to be on our own.