Military Review

BTR-87 with the Kornet anti-tank complex

69
The latest BTR-87 has increased firepower compared to serial wheeled armored vehicles and is capable of destroying the most modern Tanks, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta.


BTR-87 with the Kornet anti-tank complex


According to the newspaper, managed weapon on Russian armored vehicles appeared in 1966, when the BMP-1 with the Malyutka complex was launched into mass production. At the same time, neither Soviet nor foreign designers were in a hurry to arm wheeled armored personnel carriers with missiles. True, there was one exception: at the time of the Warsaw Pact, the Polish SKOT-2AR received for some time an ATGM 9М14М, but later this idea was abandoned.

After the collapse of the USSR, the BTR-90 with the combat compartment of the BMP-2 became the first wheeled armored vehicle. At first, it was equipped with the Konskont-M ATGM, then received the most modern complex, the Kornet. The machine was put into service, but not mass produced.

"Cornets" are also available in the arsenal of the promising K-17 "Boomerang". But if the armored vehicles created on the basis of an average unified platform can be designated by the term “new direction”, then the BTR-87 is an evolutionary development of the BTR-80 and BTR-82 armored personnel carriers known in many countries. Its main difference from its predecessors - the front location of the engine compartment and exit from the stern.

The machine is armed with 30-mm cannon, 7,62-mm machine gun and the above-mentioned "Kornet", the missiles of which are capable of hitting the enemy at a distance of 5,5 km (new versions are already striking at 10 km).

The weight of the armored vehicle is about 16,5 tons, the maximum speed is 90 km / h (afloat - up to 14 km / h). Power reserve - 800 km. Capacity - 10 people.
Photos used:
Alexey Brusilov / rg.ru
69 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Proton
    Proton 9 August 2018 16: 41
    +32
    Right now I look everywhere such a tendency, to hang everything that can be on the old car, blurt out a new index, call it "evolution" and carry on exhibitions, maybe someone will buy request laughing
    1. MPN
      MPN 9 August 2018 16: 45
      +2
      Quote: Proton
      Right now I look everywhere such a tendency, to hang everything that can be on the old car, blurt out a new index, call it "evolution" and carry on exhibitions, maybe someone will buy request laughing
      Well, the trend is not bad, it’s kind of like, just how does it fit into tactics and combat manuals? Should Vanya again invent a company?
      1. maxim947
        maxim947 9 August 2018 16: 47
        +6
        Right now I look everywhere such a tendency, to hang everything that can be on the old car, blurt out a new index, call it "evolution" and carry on exhibitions, maybe someone will buy

        First, understand what happened before and what happened, and then draw such conclusions. External resemblance does not always mean that they "slept" the same with minor changes, transferring the engine to the front is already worth a lot. There is such a concept of modernization.
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 9 August 2018 16: 51
          +6
          Modular weapons are needed, and not hung like this.
          Put on the machine a standard connector for the module, and make a bunch of different modules under this connector. The same "Cornet", "Igloo", electronic warfare, locators, radio scanners and repeaters, an additional machine gun, etc. And let the commander decide what to hang at a particular moment.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 9 August 2018 16: 56
            +8
            Quote: Shurik70
            And let the commander himself decide what specifically to hang at a particular moment

            And what "hang up", the commander will get out of his pocket? Or how?
            1. maxim947
              maxim947 9 August 2018 16: 58
              +2
              Because of the sinus) now the general designers are giving advice ..
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 9 August 2018 17: 06
                +2
                Quote: maxim947
                Because of the sinus

                Right And how I did not catch up immediately recourse
                And the "hang" will, I believe, by the crew ... already. I remembered a joke about tankers and a fairy. Well, when the tank tower fell off Yes
              2. Uryukc
                Uryukc 9 August 2018 22: 23
                0
                Quote: maxim947
                Because of the sinus) now the general designers are giving advice ..

                Well, you and your "breakthrough" proposals are not under the gene. whether you mow the constructor))) So you yourself do not need any “advice”, but the General Staff is always ready to “enlighten” ... funny))
                1. maxim947
                  maxim947 10 August 2018 06: 55
                  +1
                  Who are you positioning as the General Staff? Myself or something? So, don’t be shy, offer the next stupid advice on where and which missiles to push, wings can attach, etc. Developers do not understand anything in this matter.
          2. CentDo
            CentDo 9 August 2018 17: 03
            +3
            And let the commander decide what to hang at a particular moment.

            That is, behind each armored personnel carrier there must still be a transport column dusting, in which all the spare modules along with the technicians? And to transfer such a unit by rail will need a couple of additional trains? So on these trains it’s easier to transfer a couple of units.
        2. prapor55
          prapor55 9 August 2018 17: 10
          +1
          From the photo it’s difficult to understand what and where therefore it is difficult to comment here
        3. MPN
          MPN 9 August 2018 17: 15
          0
          Quote: maxim947
          Understand first

          Are you me
        4. Proton
          Proton 9 August 2018 17: 41
          0
          Modernization is an improvement, but that's all, when something was rearranged somewhere, something was suspended and called this new machine, called management.
          1. Sergey ippon
            Sergey ippon 12 August 2018 02: 23
            0
            bulletproof and mine mine armor is different - better.
            they already wrote about the motor - they transferred it, which is not bad.
            The frontal projection of the machine with mounted modules is able to withstand the shell of 23 mm guns when firing from a distance of 500 m. Own and additional armor also provide all angle protection from 12,7 mm bullets.
            and the other he judging by the fot.
            sorry only the back door and removed the side door
            aft ramp and side door on the left would be nice - in my opinion.
      2. Ros 56
        Ros 56 9 August 2018 19: 14
        0
        Should Vanya again invent a company?

        And you wanted Shoigu to come up with other things to his mind. laughing
      3. Vkd dvk
        Vkd dvk 16 August 2018 11: 40
        0
        Quote: MPN
        Quote: Proton
        Right now I look everywhere such a tendency, to hang everything that can be on the old car, blurt out a new index, call it "evolution" and carry on exhibitions, maybe someone will buy request laughing
        Well, the trend is not bad, it’s kind of like, just how does it fit into tactics and combat manuals? Should Vanya again invent a company?

        The question is, of course, interesting. Attack of the enemy in a dense formation, when "di erste marshirt column, dictate marshirt column ...." corresponds to modern regulations? And what is primary - the idea of ​​waging a battle with maximum losses for the enemy and minimum own, which fit into the regulations, or regulations are primary, and everything else is nonsense?
        A new weapon appears, it is invincible by any charters. And (I think so), charters should reflect innovations in a timely manner. Otherwise, we will continue to clean our guns with a brick.
    2. Igoresha
      Igoresha 9 August 2018 16: 46
      -1
      Well, how can I say, Ukraine is already winning, says an arms expert bully http://www.dsnews.ua/politics/sorevnovanie-termin
      atororov-pochemu-vsu-pobezhdayut-okkupantov-09082
      018080000
      1. poquello
        poquello 9 August 2018 16: 54
        0
        how they win will tell the investigative committee
      2. poquello
        poquello 13 August 2018 04: 37
        0
        Quote: Igoresha
        u how to say, Ukraine is already winning, says an expert on armaments

        I’ve specifically returned to put a big and bold minus to you and your expert, and then you don’t have to tell me that on the video from LDNR they specially glued a red cross on the car - I won’t believe it
        1. Igoresha
          Igoresha 13 August 2018 18: 13
          0
          that’s why he is an expert, in the Ukrainian media there is no pluralism of opinions and cannot be - a botseyevrop. Nobody wants a pogrom in the editorial office or a Molotov cocktail in the window.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. poquello
      poquello 9 August 2018 16: 51
      +3
      Quote: Proton
      Right now I look everywhere such a tendency, to hang everything that can be on the old car, blurt out a new index, call it "evolution" and carry on exhibitions, maybe someone will buy request laughing

      in to hang on trophy abrams and think they have super tanks)))))))
    5. Sergey ippon
      Sergey ippon 11 August 2018 01: 15
      0
      yeah)
      well, all the tanks in horror hid in hangars wassat
  2. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 9 August 2018 16: 51
    0
    And how many are there, or how many will buy? Now you can believe the facts that the equipment is purchased and goes to parts, and not the tales that our grandchildren will build them much more than 5 pieces - more precisely 9 go even 10 for the whole army.
  3. Cinema
    Cinema 9 August 2018 16: 54
    +4
    and again new wicks on the same cardboard coffin - nothing new
  4. san4es
    san4es 9 August 2018 17: 21
    +8
    hi ... BTR-87 represents a radical modernization of the BTR-80/82 family, with the most significant difference being the layout change. Armament provides for the installation of various combat modules, including uninhabited ones.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 August 2018 18: 17
      +3
      This armored personnel carrier is perfect for border guards.
  5. Ustin Umarov
    Ustin Umarov 9 August 2018 17: 40
    +5
    And what about the protection of the crew and the landing, all the same at the 50 level of the year, bulletproof? Shame on you!
    1. Professor
      Professor 9 August 2018 17: 49
      +7
      Quote: Ustin Umarov
      And what about the protection of the crew and the landing, all the same at the 50 level of the year, bulletproof? Shame on you!

      Have you read the article? Well it's written right there "Newest BTR-87 has increased firepower compared to serial wheeled armored vehicles and is capable of destroying the most modern tanks, Rossiyskaya Gazeta writes.". Do you understand the" latest "? Not even the" new ", but the" newest. "This is not some Boomerang or Kurgan. You haven’t written anything about the defense. request
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 9 August 2018 17: 58
        +13
        They also forgot to write "having no analogues in the world" ....
      2. prapor55
        prapor55 9 August 2018 22: 22
        +3
        In the Soviet Army, in the motorized rifle regiments, anti-tank battalions were in chaos in general and there were bassoons. The citizens of the tank does not have absolute protection, it’s enough to confuse the soft with the warm. Just Each motorized rifle squad will receive a real means of fighting tanks. What did the battalion’s battalion commander have before? Platoon SPG-9 and RPG-7 in the companies and all.
        1. Xscorpion
          Xscorpion 12 August 2018 11: 43
          +1
          Quote: prapor55
          In the Soviet Army, in the motorized rifle regiments, anti-tank battalions were in chaos in general and there were bassoons. The citizens of the tank does not have absolute protection, it’s enough to confuse the soft with the warm. Just Each motorized rifle squad will receive a real means of fighting tanks. What did the battalion’s battalion commander have before? Platoon SPG-9 and RPG-7 in the companies and all.


          Now there are battalion tactical groups, and modern battalion commanders now have, in addition to the regular PTVs, tanks, sau, and city.
      3. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 10 August 2018 08: 59
        0
        Speaking of protection, nothing is written

        Well, yes, 20 mm ceramic panels are hung, and holds 14,5 mm, it's like on a BM Typhoon
  6. APASUS
    APASUS 9 August 2018 17: 56
    +6
    BTR -82 is outdated for modern combat, the resource of modernization also came up. But lately, the trends in our armaments began to resemble Ukraine more. Put on the old car a new gun and anti-tank systems and that’s all. And the new equipment is only in parades
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 August 2018 18: 19
      +1
      And with new technology, not everything is as smooth as it seems.
  7. 2329 Carpenter
    2329 Carpenter 9 August 2018 18: 24
    0
    Well, and so, judging by the discontented, aggressive and critical comments of experienced BTR-users - the machine is that really sucks the world?
    1. spektr9
      spektr9 9 August 2018 19: 46
      +2
      Well, an armored personnel carrier must deliver infantry to the battlefield, and it’s very good when it gets there alive, we have 7 mm armor on them, which makes its way out of any large caliber ... Therefore, they don’t like 80
      1. Sweetheart
        Sweetheart 12 August 2018 12: 53
        0
        Quote: spektr9
        we have 7 mm armor on them, which makes its way to take off with any large caliber

        What kind of fantasies? When was the last time you were put in by some caliber in the Btr-80?
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 10 August 2018 07: 33
      0
      This is a step forward compared to the BTR 80 ... and in theory, it should have been produced instead of the BTR-82A .....
  8. spektr9
    spektr9 9 August 2018 19: 39
    +4
    Poor 80, even during the Afghan war, insufficient braving was revealed, it was not for nothing that 90 began to be developed, but a scribe happened and 80 became eternal ....
  9. kind
    kind 9 August 2018 20: 04
    +1
    and the “Cornet” mentioned above, whose missiles are capable of hitting the enemy at a distance of up to 5,5 km (new versions hit 10 km).

    10 km., Is it for the desert or something ??? What goal can be seen at 10 km.?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 August 2018 22: 06
      0
      Now optical instruments can be at 20 and 30 kilometers, all you want to see.
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 9 August 2018 22: 25
        +5
        Quote: Vadim237
        Now optical instruments can be 20 and 30 kilometers away, all you want to see

        Vadim, you are ... dim-witted. Unlike optical devices. The question was absolutely correct:
        Quote: Good
        10 km., is it for the desert or something?

        Because even in the steppe you nevermind that 10 km. take a look. Even in appliances request
        1. troset
          troset 9 August 2018 23: 19
          +1
          Golovan Jack (Roman) There are so many of you and all of you further. And in the steppes there are barrows and heights, so for 10 km there is a place to throw a sight.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 9 August 2018 23: 22
            +2
            Quote: troset
            And in the steppe there are also mounds and heights, so for 10 km there is much to throw

            Throw it. I’m talking about the general case, you tell me about the particular.
            Well, how to say ... with mustard, probably come down request
            On the other hand - put the tank on the hill, so that there is something over 10 km. look ... and if there is ATGM, but not 10, but where is it closer?
            In general, I would think hard before.
            1. troset
              troset 9 August 2018 23: 39
              0
              ATGM and infantry works well (bunker pillbox). In the mountains, the reinforcement was often carried out with the help of anti-tank systems and the distance mattered.
            2. Chicha squad
              Chicha squad 10 August 2018 09: 54
              0
              I wrote a letter to the developers. I say clean your 10 km, the guys on the topvar said we do not need 10 km.
            3. Sergey ippon
              Sergey ippon 11 August 2018 01: 18
              -1
              intelligence and interconnection solves all the same drones.
          2. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 10 August 2018 12: 40
            0
            Is there no way to highlight a target with a drone?
        2. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 10 August 2018 07: 35
          0
          It depends on what purpose. The tank is unlikely ... and ATGM with OF warhead, around the house, for example, completely.
      2. Vanek
        Vanek 10 August 2018 05: 39
        +2
        Quote: Vadim237
        20 and 30 kilometers


        This is already beyond the visible horizon. Even in the desert. For such a distance, you need to look from the top.
  10. DED_peer_DED
    DED_peer_DED 9 August 2018 20: 17
    +4

    You can take a closer look and not find double doors on the sides, and much more, different.
    The layout and body are not 80-82 at all.
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 10 August 2018 07: 36
      0
      The layout is completely different, but on BTR-82A technologies. Close to Ukrainian Bucephalus.
      1. Chicha squad
        Chicha squad 10 August 2018 09: 55
        +1
        And not vice versa?
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 11 August 2018 07: 44
          0
          And who was before?
          1. Sweetheart
            Sweetheart 12 August 2018 12: 55
            0
            Quote: Zaurbek
            And who was before?

            Who cares?
            Whoever stole the wheel from Bucephalus, is it possible for the ancient ukrov? Or who else, for example, the Narts?
  11. brr1
    brr1 10 August 2018 08: 24
    0
    Quote: professor
    Quote: Ustin Umarov
    And what about the protection of the crew and the landing, all the same at the 50 level of the year, bulletproof? Shame on you!

    Have you read the article? Well it's written right there "Newest BTR-87 has increased firepower compared to serial wheeled armored vehicles and is capable of destroying the most modern tanks, Rossiyskaya Gazeta writes.". Do you understand the" latest "? Not even the" new ", but the" newest. "This is not some Boomerang or Kurgan. You haven’t written anything about the defense. request

    Again, Jewish sparkling humor, such as catch the goyim.
  12. Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk 10 August 2018 14: 00
    +1
    = The latest BTR-87 has increased firepower compared to serial wheeled armored vehicles and is capable of destroying the most modern tanks, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta =
    I’m trying to imagine a tank duel with an BTR-87 in which the BTR would be the winner. Do not get it.
    But that’s not what worries me. I am concerned about the diversity of all these APCs, BMPs, BMDs.
    I understand that the universal is the enemy of the good, but the infinite variety is the enemy of the optimal.
    In my opinion, the endless development of everything new and new (actually not new, but old with some kind of additive) is just a waste of money and a way to the dead end where it is difficult to choose the right one
  13. Skifotavr
    Skifotavr 11 August 2018 08: 01
    -1
    Another "NEWEST"! With ukrov laughing, and they themselves mold the same disgrace.
    1. Sweetheart
      Sweetheart 12 August 2018 12: 57
      -1
      Quote: Skifotavr
      You laugh with ukrov, and sculpt yourself the same disgrace.

      At the expense of disgrace ... you’ve got the ukrovsky flag, so you wouldn’t be dishonored, not on BTR-80,82 armor bursts at the seams and without them. But on your Btr-4,3 and other junk. In this case, use from 60 up to 80 ...
      1. Skifotavr
        Skifotavr 18 August 2018 03: 17
        0
        Well, here's a Russian flag for you - and then what? Has anything changed from this? I was not born under these flags at all. For more than distinguishing the flags of the mind is not enough? The only consolation of Russia is that in Ukraine it’s a little worse, which I congratulate you on. good fool
  14. Warrior2015
    Warrior2015 11 August 2018 13: 16
    +3
    In my opinion, this is a very good thing: the armored vehicle always lacked firepower, and the Cornet lacked mobility, because it is heavy to carry, and it is much better to put it on an armored personnel carrier than on the same "Tiger". In fact, now the BTR80-87 can withstand the tank, which is great.
    1. Sweetheart
      Sweetheart 12 August 2018 13: 00
      +1
      Quote: Warrior2015
      In my opinion, this is a very good thing: the armored vehicle always lacked firepower, and the Cornet lacked mobility, because it is heavy to carry, and it is much better to put it on an armored personnel carrier than on the same "Tiger". In fact, now the BTR80-87 can withstand the tank, which is great.

      Well, at least one sensible comment, otherwise all the fantasies of warhammer players, to throw armor one and a half meters, guns from a dozen ... The writers do not understand .. The armored personnel carrier is not a tank, its use is somewhat different.
      Here you can’t read it. For example, Middle Eastern writers, it becomes so funny to imagine them ONLY, for example, in the mountainous terrain of Chechnya .. you will have to take this hippopotamus out of the mud with the help of the crew ...
  15. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 12: 52
    +2
    Quote: Proton
    Right now I look everywhere such a tendency, to hang everything that can be on the old car, blurt out a new index, call it "evolution" and carry on exhibitions, maybe someone will buy request laughing

    Why change the chassis and armor? She has proven herself and has been tested for years in battles and exploitation. now they are only changing the armaments and protection of the equipment itself and the fighters.
    when the chassis and armor do not correspond to the mission and protection of the combat personnel, they will change the entire hull, etc. so that everything is true!
  16. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 12: 56
    +1
    Quote: Warrior2015
    In my opinion, this is a very good thing: the armored vehicle always lacked firepower, and the Cornet lacked mobility, because it is heavy to carry, and it is much better to put it on an armored personnel carrier than on the same "Tiger". In fact, now the BTR80-87 can withstand the tank, which is great.

    totally agree with you.
  17. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 13: 03
    0
    Quote: Skifotavr
    +1
    Another "NEWEST"! With ukrov laughing, and they themselves mold the same disgrace.

    BTR-87, this is a new machine, unlike what you sculpt.
    so that you don’t need to shag a butterfly!
  18. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 13: 07
    0
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    = The latest BTR-87 has increased firepower compared to serial wheeled armored vehicles and is capable of destroying the most modern tanks, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta =
    I’m trying to imagine a tank duel with an BTR-87 in which the BTR would be the winner. Do not get it.
    But that’s not what worries me. I am concerned about the diversity of all these APCs, BMPs, BMDs.
    I understand that the universal is the enemy of the good, but the infinite variety is the enemy of the optimal.
    In my opinion, the endless development of everything new and new (actually not new, but old with some kind of additive) is just a waste of money and a way to the dead end where it is difficult to choose the right one

    What does nothing new mean? other bodies, other chassis, other engine, WEAPONS SYSTEM OTHER and most interestingly, that everything is interchangeable.
  19. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 13: 13
    0
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    They also forgot to write "having no analogues in the world" ....

    so add it))
  20. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 13: 37
    0
    Quote: Ustin Umarov
    And what about the protection of the crew and the landing, all the same at the 50 level of the year, bulletproof? Shame on you!

    And let's not let out the armored personnel carrier ?? tanks are better and protect against bullets. Truth?
    let's infantry will rush through the fields at a gallop ?? while they run, you look and the group that asked for support is destroyed ((is that better, right ??
    it is written because there is a hinged defense that holds a bullet of 12,7 or can not read?
  21. Rocj
    Rocj 12 August 2018 13: 42
    0
    Quote: MPN
    Should Vanya again invent a company?

    Yes! all the changes that are made, after and brought to the mountain by company men, soldiers who use this machine every day, in battle and in exercises. collect data from the gunner, driver, etc., and then improve the car. it was and is and always will be. designers cannot provide for everything.