Nevskoye Design Bureau: Admiral Kuznetsov will be upgraded to MiG-29K / KUB

48
The head of the Nevsky Design Bureau (PKB), which developed the ship modernization project, Sergey Orlov, said that during the modernization of the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrying cruiser, a revision will be made for deck-mounted MiG-29KK / KUB aircraft.

Nevskoye Design Bureau: Admiral Kuznetsov will be upgraded to MiG-29K / KUB




In an interview with TASS, Orlov said that MiG-29K / KUB, Su-33 airplanes and several types of helicopters would be based on the cruiser. Just under the MiG-29K / KUB you need to make some improvements. In the course of the modernization, practically the whole complex of aviation technical ship systems will be replaced.

It should be recalled that the tests of the MiG-29K / KUB fighter on the Admiral Kuznetsov were launched in the 2016 year. During the long cruise of the aircraft-carrying cruiser to the shores of Syria, these aircraft were part of the ship’s aircraft group.

According to the tactical and technical data of the ship, the air group of 24-26 aircraft and 12 helicopters is located on the cruiser. The composition of the wing is 660 people. In addition, anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles are located on the Admiral Kuznetsov weapon and artillery mounts.

The contract for the repair and modernization of the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft-carrying cruiser was signed in April. It is planned that the repair will last until 2021, when the cruiser returns to the Naval fleet RF The cost of repair and modernization, according to preliminary estimates, will be about $ 1 billion.


Nevsky PKB is the only bureau in the country that designs aircraft carriers and amphibious ships of various classes.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    6 August 2018 11: 54
    With rockets, is granite a cavity removed, or what kind of place is it stuck in?
    1. +1
      6 August 2018 11: 56
      Quote: spektr9

      With rockets, is granite a cavity removed, or what kind of place is it stuck in?

      You’ll come to know, now what is it for you?
      1. 0
        6 August 2018 11: 57
        You’ll come to know, now what is it for you?
        Interesting to me
        ps If you don’t particularly advertise, then most likely the first
        1. +2
          6 August 2018 11: 59
          Quote: spektr9
          Interesting to me

          Learn, it will be very interesting wink
          1. +7
            6 August 2018 12: 00
            Learn, it will be very interesting

            Your pathetic attempts to study trolling, oh don’t flatter yourself ...
            1. +2
              6 August 2018 12: 05
              Quote: spektr9
              Your pathetic attempts to study trolling, oh don’t flatter yourself ...

              In this case, if you are so much interested, go to work in the Moscow Region
              1. +5
                6 August 2018 12: 08
                In this case, if you are so much interested, go to work in the Moscow Region
                But how can I figure out where to go to work without a troll with a monkey on an avatar laughing
                ps And so here’s the folk wisdom "don’t tell me what to do and I won’t tell you where to go" wink
                1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                7 August 2018 11: 53
                Alexander, you’re wrong! You are rightly told that if you don’t need to be interested, then why the article .. you are respected in zeros!
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +8
        6 August 2018 12: 07
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        You’ll come to know, now what is it for you?

        The man asked a question on the article. And if you’re never once in the subject, then you climb wherever you get?
        1. +1
          6 August 2018 12: 19
          Quote: Gargantua
          And if you’re never once in the subject, then you climb wherever you get?

          And all the more to you dosvidos I have already said more than once.
          1. +2
            6 August 2018 12: 24
            I hope we will not see you again on this resource wink Seriously, apart from flooding, nothing else comes from you. Be so kind as to contribute to the purification of VO from the dirt - disappear angry
            1. 0
              6 August 2018 12: 30
              Quote: Gargantua
              I hope we will not see you again on this resource

              Hope dies last
            2. +2
              6 August 2018 22: 32
              Quote: Gargantua
              apart from flood, nothing comes from you anymore.

              It is extremely rare, but Romanov’s thoughts are sensible.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        7 August 2018 11: 51
        If you ask a person what’s to him, then what’s the article here?
    2. 0
      6 August 2018 12: 20
      If you remove rockets from him, what will he even be like? wassat
      1. 0
        6 August 2018 12: 39
        Nobody will clean anything! They wrote earlier that they plan to exchange Granites for Caliber! They stuttered about replacing the launchers themselves. But what happens in the end, we will find out when they announce, or someone will suck!
    3. +1
      6 August 2018 12: 22
      To remove the "Granites", you need to disassemble almost half of the ship completely. The bow of the ship was built around them. Although it’s possible they will remove it (at least they wanted it until the budget was cut, the sea component in the money was badly cut). And so, yes it would be good, in the first place the armament for the aircraft could be loaded an order of magnitude more and the fleet of fighters on the Kuz could be increased.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  2. MPN
    0
    6 August 2018 12: 18
    The cost of repair and modernization, according to preliminary estimates, will be about $ 1 billion.
    I did not find what the Chinese aircraft carrier costs ... request Maybe an acceptable repair price, taking into account the rearmament ..., but ....
    Popular chinese aircraft carriers of good quality and at affordable prices you can buy on AliExpress.
    1. 0
      7 August 2018 13: 56
      Well, let's throw off the whole country wassat
      1. 0
        7 August 2018 14: 41
        $ 4 per nose and we have 2 aircraft carriers. No one tried it?
  3. +1
    6 August 2018 12: 18
    Now there’s not five on it. WHOLE SIX PLANES WILL BE (well, or how many there are laughing ) !!! America looks in horror at its carrier trash wassat
    1. +2
      6 August 2018 12: 20
      Quote: Stoler
      Now it’s not five AND A WHOLE SIX PLANES WILL BE

      For those who do not read below the title
      on the cruiser there is an air group of 24-26 planes and 12 helicopters
      1. +1
        6 August 2018 12: 23
        wink "According to the tactical and technical data of the ship"
        1. +1
          6 August 2018 12: 24
          Quote: Stoler
          According to the tactical and technical data of the ship "

          But in fact? We assume?
      2. +2
        6 August 2018 12: 28
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Stoler
        Now it’s not five AND A WHOLE SIX PLANES WILL BE

        For those who do not read below the title
        on the cruiser there is an air group of 24-26 planes and 12 helicopters

        for those who don’t read at all: “Admiral Kuznetsov” in the dock, under repair, there are no airplanes and helicopters there. wassat
        1. 0
          6 August 2018 12: 30
          Quote: Dead Day
          "Admiral Kuznetsov" in the dock, under repair, there are no planes and helicopters there.

          Fuck, how smart you are.
          1. +2
            6 August 2018 12: 38
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: Dead Day
            "Admiral Kuznetsov" in the dock, under repair, there are no planes and helicopters there.

            Fuck, how smart you are.

            Well, I won’t compare with you ... to me! tongue
  4. 0
    6 August 2018 16: 21
    hi .. during the modernization of the aircraft carrier cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" will be finalized for deck aircraft MiG-29K / KUB ..
    ... Mig -29K can destroy both air, sea and ground targets at any time and in any weather .... soldier
    1. 0
      7 August 2018 11: 20
      Negotiable range of 2000 km ??? The combat radius without weapons for working on the ground is less than 700 km, and with bombs. ??? What are the requirements as a multi-purpose marine with the ability to work on land, he satisfies? Sorry for the pilots who are forced to lie .... Its engines sucks and they don’t meet the requirements of 4 ++ .... As a ship, he’s the most crap ...
  5. +2
    6 August 2018 17: 56
    Admiral Kuznetsov, with his only in the country and poorly trained air wing, is more of a burden for the fleet than a trump card. And if, in the event of a conflict, we unsubscribe to American aircraft carriers only a few days until they are completely destroyed, then Kuznetsov is better not to go to sea at all.
    For reference: For the entire period of use of the Russian (Soviet) fleets in the post-sailing era, he did not win a single naval victory.
    1. +4
      6 August 2018 19: 29
      Question: And what does it mean to win (recall the Battle of Yutlan)?

      The battle of the steam frigate Vladimir with the capture of a similar ship of the Turks.
      Confrontation of the Black Sea armadillos and Geben.
      Fight Novik with German destroyers.
      The sinking of Magdeburg
      1914 won company in the Baltic. As a result of the mine war, several large ships were damaged.

      In the Second World War, there were no large surface ships between us and the Germans.
    2. +1
      7 August 2018 05: 49
      due to its geographical location, the Russian Navy does not have to defeat anyone. The Navy is obliged, in collaboration with other forces, to prevent the approach of the enemy fleet at a distance to strike at strategic targets of the Russian Federation and their allies. The principle was so even under the kings. During WWII, this was clearly manifested.
      BUT I agree that the Russian aircraft carriers are not needed. With Kuznetsov, Soviet military leaders probably just wanted to experiment in creating a universal ship with the capabilities of both a cruiser and an aircraft carrier.
    3. 0
      7 August 2018 11: 11
      Will the MIG-29K fly around the mast? With their combat radius, it’s difficult to fly further, especially in the strike version on the ground. In this case, there is not enough fuel even for a second approach ....
      1. 0
        7 August 2018 14: 04
        I’m not an expert at all once, but why is a deck aircraft a range of more than 500 km? I’m not kidding. I just want to know
  6. +1
    6 August 2018 20: 48
    Quote: alstr
    Question: And what does it mean to win?

    Remember the Tsushima battle and the 2nd World War in the Pacific. Then everything will become clear to you.

    In the Second World War, there were no large surface ships between us and the Germans.

    Of course it wasn’t, they couldn’t be, because the USSR did not have a fleet capable of withstanding the German one.
    1. +2
      6 August 2018 22: 41
      Not so simple. The Germans did not have a fleet at the Black Sea Fleet, mine soup and aircraft in the Baltic, what should Tirpitz or Bismarck do there? In the Northern Fleet, the Germans practically did not climb large ships into the zone of responsibility of the Northern Fleet, only Sheyer's campaign and all ....
      1. 0
        7 August 2018 06: 38
        You can’t take the ships of the city
        1. 0
          7 August 2018 12: 13
          Where are the coasts ... there and the cities ... do not carry nonsense!
          1. -1
            7 August 2018 14: 02
            yeah of course, well, if they took Moscow with Tirpicem, if they didn’t take it? the ship can only support the troops on the shore, and tanks with infantry will take cities in the old fashioned way (neither of them will do this alone)
  7. 0
    7 August 2018 00: 44
    Quote: ZAV69
    Not so simple. The Germans did not have a fleet at the Black Sea Fleet, mine soup and aircraft in the Baltic, what should Tirpitz or Bismarck do there? In the Northern Fleet, the Germans practically did not climb large ships into the zone of responsibility of the Northern Fleet, only Sheyer's campaign and all ....

    Who cares, the German fleet was in any case more powerful and modern. And his chances of winning in the event of an open confrontation with the Soviet fleet were incomparably higher.
    Do not argue with the story.
    1. +2
      7 August 2018 12: 02
      Not just higher, in our fleet in an open confrontation with the German, they were completely zero!
    2. 0
      7 August 2018 12: 11
      I dare not say anything bad about our history, but Bismarck, Tirpitz, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau .. would have sunk our entire fleet of those times .. not counting the z-series destroyers .. although we also had good destroyers due to the crew’s crew force !! !! In the Second World War with the Kriegsmarine, only the British could fight .. and then when Huud went into the abyss ... they were very scared .. Unfortunately, even now, the destroyers of the Arly Burke series ... will easily sink all our fleets together, I remind you. . their 68 only the old series .. and still the latest build .. all with URO ... and what are we opposing? And to the proponents of the Danahr strategy enanamoceanian fleets and amorous "I will say ... the USSR was therefore a great power because such idiots in the government did not sit !!!!
    3. +2
      7 August 2018 12: 16
      Quote: Apollo
      Quote: ZAV69
      Not so simple. The Germans did not have a fleet at the Black Sea Fleet, mine soup and aircraft in the Baltic, what should Tirpitz or Bismarck do there? In the Northern Fleet, the Germans practically did not climb large ships into the zone of responsibility of the Northern Fleet, only Sheyer's campaign and all ....

      Who cares, the German fleet was in any case more powerful and modern. And his chances of winning in the event of an open confrontation with the Soviet fleet were incomparably higher.
      Do not argue with the story.

      Hello beloved of the gods !!, Before you write this, you need to look into the documents of that time, And the State Defense Plan of 1938-1940 clearly prescribed the cover of the coastal zone of the Baltic and Black Sea, And the prevailing doctrine of the British spoke of something else, the fighting clashes of squadrons, There simply were no other At that time, the French had a fleet much more powerful than the German one, but only in 40, the role of aviation against ships was clearly highlighted. There simply wasn’t time to solve the problem. For a long time, even former opponents recognized that our fleet acted contrary to what was written. th fleet action standards Read the Germans that fought against SSSR.A with Kuznetsov's all right, he alone can something someone teeth fast break off. Just as time goes by, new weapons appear. They will update and see how many surprises he will have. All health
  8. 0
    7 August 2018 06: 37
    A billion dollars worth of repairs is a damn tank division of the new (300 pieces) T-90 Breakthrough. I don’t even know which is better - I outweigh the newest tanks from the KAZ Arena E in favor of the troops, since there are no new tanks from the KAZ anyway.
    1. 0
      7 August 2018 12: 15
      And here you can’t argue with you .. only you indicate the number of combat units in the division!
  9. 0
    7 August 2018 13: 15
    Quote: igor.borov775
    Hello beloved of the gods !!, Before you write this, you need to look into the documents of that time, And the State Defense Plan of 1938-1940 clearly prescribed the cover of the coastal zone of the Baltic and Black Sea, And the prevailing doctrine of the British spoke of something else, the fighting clashes of squadrons, There simply were no other At that time, the French had a fleet much more powerful than the German one, but only in 40, the role of aviation against ships was clearly highlighted. There simply wasn’t time to solve the problem. For a long time, even former opponents recognized that our fleet acted contrary to what was written. th fleet action standards Read the Germans that fought against SSSR.A with Kuznetsov's all right, he alone can something someone teeth fast break off. Just as time goes by, new weapons appear. They will update and see how many surprises he will have. All health

    They tell you about the realities of that time, and you, "if only, if only ..." Yes, you are a dreamer ...
  10. -1
    7 August 2018 14: 22
    ... without regaining consciousness
  11. +1
    7 August 2018 19: 23
    The Soviet fleet was completely paraffinized, I advise you to recall the example of the cruiser Marat in Leningrad, which did not let the Germans close. He fulfilled his task even on the shore and on his side. And taking into account the modern missile, it has long been known that our missile from the pier can not even go into the sea, even if they come out it will complicate the task for the enemy.
    Quote: Apollo
    Quote: ZAV69
    Not so simple. The Germans did not have a fleet at the Black Sea Fleet, mine soup and aircraft in the Baltic, what should Tirpitz or Bismarck do there? In the Northern Fleet, the Germans practically did not climb large ships into the zone of responsibility of the Northern Fleet, only Sheyer's campaign and all ....

    Who cares, the German fleet was in any case more powerful and modern. And his chances of winning in the event of an open confrontation with the Soviet fleet were incomparably higher.
    Do not argue with the story.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"