The network has a photo of the sinking aircraft carrier "America"

113
A photo taken at the time of the death of the American aircraft carrier America (CV-66), which sank in May 2005 year after testing various anti-ship on it, was published on the Internet weapons, Said Rossiyskaya Gazeta.





Of the four aircraft carriers built in 60-s, only he got the heroic fate of perishing in the name of ensuring the safety of future generations of ships - the designers who designed the aircraft carrier of a new generation, needed data on the impact of modern weapons on large-sized ships.

There was no such data in the United States, since not a single American aircraft carrier was sunk.

The fellows of “America” suffered a more prosaic fate: the CV-64 Constellation (“Constellation”) was dismantled for scrap; CV-67 John F. Kennedy was turned into a museum that barely kept afloat due to lack of funding; from the aircraft carrier CV-63 Kitty Hawk also wanted to make a museum, but due to lack of money, they changed their mind and began to prepare it for recycling.



Initially, seafarers ’plans to put the CV-66 to the bottom caused a wave of public outcry, and in the first place this was due to the aircraft carrier’s name. But then Admiral John Natman explained that “America”, with his heroic act, would make the last and vital contribution to the national defense of the country. The protests subsided.

In April, 2005, the ship was towed into the ocean for several hundred kilometers from the coast of Virginia (Virginia). Then the beating began. The sappers placed dozens of charges on the aircraft carrier that simulate hitting torpedoes and cruise missiles. Four weeks thundered explosions below and above the waterline. But the ship only rocked and remained afloat. And only May 14 he began to roll on his nose, and then sank, dropping to a depth of about 6 kilometers.

  • https://ru.wikipedia.org, https://twitter.com/o_gilvi
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

113 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    5 August 2018 19: 19
    America? She drowned ..
    1. +12
      5 August 2018 19: 25
      The fictitious masses, alas, do not drown, so the United States swims, and spoil the life of humanity! sad
      1. +13
        5 August 2018 19: 49
        The fictitious masses, alas, do not drown, so the United States swims, and spoil the life of humanity!

        Three words and all correct - "sinking aircraft carrier" America "" Yes
        1. +10
          5 August 2018 20: 49
          Quote: Terenin
          The fictitious masses, alas, do not drown, so the United States swims, and spoil the life of humanity!

          Three words and all correct - "sinking aircraft carrier" America "" Yes

          Every day, on a drowned American aircraft carrier, it would strengthen world peace.
          1. +5
            5 August 2018 21: 48
            Kerdyk your America wassat
            1. +12
              5 August 2018 22: 51
              Quote: Vovad
              America? She drowned ..

              That's why in the days of Stalin they did not call the new car "Homeland". Stalin only asked: “And why will you sell the Motherland?”, And the car became a “Victory”.
              And almost immediately after the death of Stalin, the river vessels Rodina appeared. So that to this Khrushchev in the next world, firewood would be planted under the cauldron.
              1. +10
                5 August 2018 23: 25
                Quote: Shurik70
                Stalin only asked: “And why will you sell the Motherland?”, And the car became a “Victory”.

                And then they began to trade Victory? Such a normal saying ... belay
                1. +5
                  6 August 2018 06: 18
                  Victory has one way or another, but there is a price. But the Motherland ...
                  1. +1
                    6 August 2018 07: 32
                    You to the psychiatrist gentlemen, comrades. Tell him about Stalin-Homeland-Victory-Khrushchov.
    2. +2
      5 August 2018 21: 09
      What about the reactor? Reactor these greenpeace fighters, I hope they took off?
      1. +10
        5 August 2018 21: 17
        Quote: elektroleg
        What about the reactor? Reactor these greenpeace fighters, I hope they took off?


        America was not a nuclear carrier.
        1. +7
          5 August 2018 23: 27
          Quote: Hiking
          America was not a nuclear carrier.

          Yes, America has no aircraft carriers at all! This is all a grand scam and Hollywood productions !!! 111 wassat
      2. +9
        5 August 2018 21: 19
        Greenpeace storms oil platforms, but drives whalers.
        Eccentric Americans, no one is going to drown them, it’s enough to knock down the antenna, and with breaking through the case, break some steam line or cable and everything else will complete the panic and love of American life.
      3. +2
        5 August 2018 23: 01
        This "ship" is not nuclear.
    3. 0
      5 August 2018 21: 47
      Just like a titanic.
      Only the ghosts of the drowned of this America do not allow the world to sleep peacefully.
    4. +4
      5 August 2018 21: 48
      Quote: Vovad
      America? She drowned ..

      =========
      Very-h-h-n SYMBOLICALLY !!!! America sank ..... hi
    5. +6
      5 August 2018 23: 00
      Quote: Vovad
      America? She drowned ..

      Generally silly mattresses have acted. They had to ask ours.
      1. They would know everything they wanted to know by drowning it on their own.
      2. They would know what we are capable of. And for them it is very important.
      And we would agree to find out what our weapons are capable of.
      Everyone would have gained invaluable experience.
      1. +3
        6 August 2018 04: 33
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        Generally silly mattresses have acted. They had to ask ours.

        And why is it ours? Help them in designing ships resistant to defeat by Russian anti-ship missiles?
        1. +2
          6 August 2018 06: 05
          Quote: Puncher
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          Generally silly mattresses have acted. They had to ask ours.

          And why is it ours? Help them in designing ships resistant to defeat by Russian anti-ship missiles?

          The eternal struggle of armor and shell. But, as you know, a shell always wins.
    6. 0
      6 August 2018 22: 55
      America drowned in barbarism. That is how one should regard the drowning of an aircraft carrier to the same country bearing the name.
  2. +17
    5 August 2018 19: 21
    very sensible decision. I can imagine how much information American shipbuilders received.
    1. +30
      5 August 2018 19: 29
      This nonsense had to be hit with real torpedoes and missiles, at the same time and the crews would be trained! Or they were afraid that they would not be able to drown him, but on the contrary, he would "give back" and melt the ships that fired at him! !! lol
      1. +2
        5 August 2018 19: 38
        It seems that something was downloaded and flooded into it.
        1. +4
          5 August 2018 20: 16
          Yeah, human sacrifices. smile
        2. +5
          5 August 2018 20: 18
          Quote: figvam
          It seems that something was downloaded and flooded into it.

          What is not clear? German gold was loaded so that the Germans would not give. Here he is drowned ...
      2. +6
        5 August 2018 20: 44
        Quote: ANCIENT
        This nonsense had to be hit with real torpedoes and missiles, at the same time and the crews would be trained!

        I support! At the same time, they tested their anti-ship missiles and torpedoes.
    2. +16
      5 August 2018 20: 30
      how much volume, it is completely stripped
      and a real aircraft carrier is equipped with aviation kerosene, an arms depot and will behave in a completely different way when hit by it
      1. +5
        5 August 2018 20: 35
        But so - four weeks they drowned one trough ... What is not an indicator of the quality of the trough (from which, however, they made a colander)?
        Yes, and information, I agree, pumped quite a bit.
        1. +1
          5 August 2018 23: 14
          Or deliberately drowned for a long time, such as America, their ships are not sunk! Advertising move however!
      2. +3
        5 August 2018 20: 46
        the hardness of the structure to external influences well and the general flooding is important to test
      3. +4
        5 August 2018 22: 05
        Quote: Graz
        and a real aircraft carrier is equipped with aviation kerosene, an arms depot and will behave in a completely different way when hit by it

        ========
        Which, in fact, the Americans themselves have proved !!!

        This is Forrestal ........

        And this is the Enterprise .......
        In both cases, fires occurred due to spontaneous launching of rockets from aircraft standing on the deck .........
      4. +2
        6 August 2018 06: 47
        Which was successfully proved by one unsuccessful pilot who nearly burned Forrestal. By the way, this comrade is sitting in the Senate now, McCain is his last name.
        1. +1
          6 August 2018 08: 31
          He was not there at all, he was stupidly present on the ship, and well, he suffered a little.
        2. -1
          6 August 2018 10: 55
          McCain damaged one plane while landing. And in RuNet, all the fires and accidents began to hang on him. In fact, he was a brave guy - he flew on attack aircraft, desperate people were taken there.
          1. +1
            6 August 2018 11: 42
            Quote: voyaka uh
            McCain damaged one plane while landing. .... In fact, he was a brave guy - he flew on attack aircraft, they took desperate there.

            That’s for sure, a coward wouldn’t shoot at rockets on the deck of an aircraft carrier.
            1. -1
              6 August 2018 14: 56
              It was not his plane. And that pilot was not in the cockpit at all.
              After this incident, missiles "to the platoon" began to be placed just before the acceleration of the aircraft.
          2. 0
            6 August 2018 16: 38
            Quote: voyaka uh

            1
            voyaka uh (Alexey) Today, 10:55 ↑
            McCain damaged one plane while landing.

            On the conscience of McCain (if he has one), four ditched aircraft.
            Immediately after the death of the pope admiral, he was fired.
        3. +1
          6 August 2018 11: 39
          Quote: Metallurg_2
          Which was successfully proved by one unsuccessful pilot who nearly burned Forrestal. By the way, this comrade is sitting in the Senate now, McCain is his last name.

          The hero’s star relied on him for Forrestal, but he didn’t send a biography at the time and didn’t tell if he had any relatives in the occupied territory. Here he got some kind of hook in the Central Committee of the CPSU and cut off the performance. Now McCain sputters anywhere, can not get in the way after such a scammer.
    3. +2
      5 August 2018 22: 35
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      very sensible decision. I can imagine how much information American shipbuilders received.

      You just confuse the gracious levels!
      Can you imagine how much AutoCAD or an entire aircraft carrier costs? Even in those days, writing a program to calculate such attacks was several orders of magnitude cheaper.
      1. +1
        6 August 2018 05: 43
        Quote: APASUS
        Can you imagine how much AutoCAD or an entire aircraft carrier costs? Even in those days, writing a program to calculate such attacks was several orders of magnitude cheaper.

        You can’t count this in AutoCAD, and in any other CAD system.
      2. +2
        6 August 2018 06: 19
        Quote: APASUS
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        very sensible decision. I can imagine how much information American shipbuilders received.

        You just confuse the gracious levels!
        Can you imagine how much AutoCAD or an entire aircraft carrier costs? Even in those days, writing a program to calculate such attacks was several orders of magnitude cheaper.


        Such tests are needed to calculate the algorithms of simulation programs
    4. 0
      6 August 2018 22: 56
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      Imagine how much information

      ... unnecessary (information) ... The day when someone begins to sink the aircraft carriers will be the final day of mankind.
  3. +4
    5 August 2018 19: 22
    It is symbolic of how they did it ... RIP, America ...
    1. +18
      5 August 2018 19: 37
      Question to moromanu: this phrase
      began to roll over his nose

      right? The roll is on board, and on the bow or stern is it trim? what
      1. +6
        5 August 2018 19: 42
        Yes, you yourself answered very well. You can call this business a longitudinal roll, in principle, not the point.
        1. +4
          5 August 2018 19: 49
          Thank you, I just wanted to clarify. hi
          1. +5
            5 August 2018 20: 45
            Pasha, when everyone drowns, their own perspective is manifested.
        2. +8
          5 August 2018 20: 17
          Quote: Jolly oldster sailor
          It is possible to call this case a longitudinal roll, in principle, not the essence.

          Well then call it "transverse pitch" so that the aviators also chuckled! laughing
        3. 0
          6 August 2018 11: 51
          Quote: Jolly oldster sailor
          Yes, you yourself answered very well. You can call this business a longitudinal roll, in principle, not the point.

          If we develop the idea further, then the left roll is trim to the left, and the right roll is trim to the right.
          The author sailed on a cargo ship with a steep differential to the left, a slight roll to the bow, at a speed of ten knots per hour ....
          1. +1
            6 August 2018 14: 54
            A cargo ship does not happen, then ... wink
            1. 0
              6 August 2018 15: 52
              Quote: igorka357
              A cargo ship does not happen, then ... wink

              One lapsus found. Well done. There are three more to find.
      2. +7
        5 August 2018 19: 53
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        right? The roll is on board, and on the bow or stern is it trim?

        pasha hi wrong they sank him. The Russian public is outraged. negative Let them lift it back and flood it right. Otherwise, we will impose sanctions Yes
      3. MPN
        +7
        5 August 2018 20: 02
        In them I watch national fun, aircraft carriers drown ...
        1. +5
          5 August 2018 20: 22
          Quote: MPN
          In them I watch national fun, aircraft carriers drown ...

          Pavel, thanks for the video. It’s a pity the Amy didn’t do underwater filming either, as this giant goes into the depths of the sea and falls to the bottom. Yes
          That would be frames of the century!
      4. +7
        5 August 2018 20: 15
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Question to moromanu: this phrase
        began to roll over his nose
        right? The roll is on board, and on the bow or stern is it trim?

        These are the costs of a journalist style.
        It could be written simply and clearly:
        "The ship slowly began to sink into the deep sea with its nose and soon completely went under the water." - And lyrically, and there are no technical mistakes.
        Somehow, however. hi
  4. +2
    5 August 2018 19: 23
    What do you call a ship - taking into account that the United States is swaying like a drunk in the wind, a new aircraft carrier of the same name will not wait a happy life! No matter how much he went to the needles ahead of schedule, someone knows what will happen to him, but will they even build a ship with that name.
    1. +9
      5 August 2018 19: 26
      Quote: ANCIENT
      What do you call a ship - taking into account that the United States is swaying like a drunk in the wind, a new aircraft carrier of the same name will not wait a happy life! No matter how much he went to the needles ahead of schedule, someone knows what will happen to him, but will they even build a ship with that name.

      yeah. You will take pity on the American Navy.
      1. +5
        5 August 2018 19: 47
        Well - "the wolf took pity on the mare - left only a tail and a mane"! wassat I hope that the future of the US fleet will coincide with the fate of the mare! !! lol
        1. +2
          5 August 2018 20: 39
          Along the way, it will be a long fate ... As if great-great-grandchildren were not waiting.
      2. 0
        5 August 2018 20: 32
        why pity him, Daggers will pity him soon
    2. +1
      6 August 2018 16: 13
      Already built and in 2014 brought into combat duty. The lead ship of the new series of universal landing ships. LHA 6. Between 17-18 already went to military service in the Middle East. While everything is ok Yes
  5. +5
    5 August 2018 19: 33
    Have you been ashamed to use real ammunition? It would be much more informative and reliable.
    And our MiG-31 would be invited. With "Daggers" ... That would be spectacular! laughing
    1. LMN
      +2
      5 August 2018 20: 21
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Have you been ashamed to use real ammunition? It would be much more informative and reliable.
      And our MiG-31 would be invited. With "Daggers" ... That would be spectacular! laughing

      Yes. It would be great to check the Daggers. good When will the "free aircraft carrier" appear for tests)) winked

      The question is, would ours agree to such an experiment?) request Yes, and the Americans probably would not want to make sure that the dagger is functioning (if successful for the dagger, of course)))
      1. +1
        5 August 2018 20: 45
        Quote: LMN
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        Have you been ashamed to use real ammunition? It would be much more informative and reliable.
        And our MiG-31 would be invited. With "Daggers" ... That would be spectacular! laughing

        Yes. It would be great to check the Daggers. good When will the "free aircraft carrier" appear for tests)) winked

        The question is, would ours agree to such an experiment?) request Yes, and the Americans probably would not want to make sure that the dagger is functioning (if successful for the dagger, of course)))

        We’ll write off Kuzyu - and let's go!
        1. LMN
          +1
          5 August 2018 23: 42
          Quote: Carpenter 2329
          Quote: LMN
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          Have you been ashamed to use real ammunition? It would be much more informative and reliable.
          And our MiG-31 would be invited. With "Daggers" ... That would be spectacular! laughing

          Yes. It would be great to check the Daggers. good When will the "free aircraft carrier" appear for tests)) winked

          The question is, would ours agree to such an experiment?) request Yes, and the Americans probably would not want to make sure that the dagger is functioning (if successful for the dagger, of course)))

          We’ll write off Kuzyu - and let's go!

          Now it’s clear why we are “restoring” it lol
    2. +5
      5 August 2018 20: 33
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And our MiG-31 would be invited. With "Daggers" ... That would be spectacular!

      Pancake! Did I miss something? Already invented a time machine !?
      photo taken at the time of the death of the American aircraft carrier America (CV-66), which sank May 2005 of the year

      Information: MiG-31K with the “Dagger” was announced by the President of the Russian Federation in March 2018 of the year.
      More details at TASS: http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/5088118
    3. 0
      5 August 2018 20: 39
      A photograph taken at the time of the death of the American aircraft carrier America (CV-66), which sank in May 2005, was published on the Internet.
      Then, in the 2005 year, “Daggers” were not.
      1. LMN
        +2
        5 August 2018 20: 46
        Quote: demo
        A photograph taken at the time of the death of the American aircraft carrier America (CV-66), which sank in May 2005, was published on the Internet.
        Then, in the 2005 year, “Daggers” were not.

        Exactly laughing
    4. +1
      5 August 2018 21: 06
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And our MiG-31 would be invited. With the "Daggers" ...

      In April 2005, the ship was towed into the ocean several hundred kilometers off the coast of Virginia (Virginia). Then the beating began (c) What are the "Daggers" in the 2005 year?
  6. +4
    5 August 2018 19: 34
    Explosions boomed for four weeks below and above the waterline


    apparently they threw Chinese firecrackers. Amerikos are able to test their equipment for survivability, and so then the Apache helicopter, which passed all the survivability tests, illiterate Afghan man fills one bullet from Kalash.
    1. MPN
      +11
      5 August 2018 19: 50
      The task was not to drown, but to obtain data on survivability, and therefore the charge power was selected most likely by increasing, at some charge passed a critical power which in a particular place had a critical effect (in the next design, we finalized this moment to the necessary strength) I think they didn’t let him sink too much (they didn’t intend to drown him from one torpedo), but the extreme charge led to the result and this was also taken into account during the design.
      1. +8
        5 August 2018 20: 15
        To imitate the defeat of mines and torpedoes, and especially dagger-type missiles with the laying of internal charges, this is a very strong stretch ... And the results? Well, the ship does not have ammunition, there is no fuel (and its aircraft carrier wing devours thousands of tons), so what did they check? Strength of the case on the effects of sapper charges?
        1. MPN
          +4
          5 August 2018 20: 21
          The task was to check something, here we checked ... The task was completed, according to the plan of the experiment, the goals were achieved, where the result is negative, also the result ... request
        2. +1
          5 August 2018 20: 44
          Hardly anyone heard about “Daggers” and their marine counterparts in 2005 on similar sites.
        3. +1
          6 August 2018 09: 46
          Namely, that is the strength of the case, but not only. Most likely they also analyzed internal damage, which can provide additional information on how to fight for survivability more successfully.
      2. 0
        6 August 2018 02: 27
        Quote: MPN
        In general, they acted correctly.


        Well, if only from a propagandist point of view, they say what are we Americans building aircraft carriers that they need to be fired at for four weeks to drown.
  7. +3
    5 August 2018 19: 52
    what nastiness is not at the bottom of the sea ... there is no greenpeace on them!
    1. +5
      5 August 2018 20: 46
      Greenpeace is the biggest disgust that is trying to position itself.
    2. +2
      5 August 2018 20: 50
      And who sponsors this ugly company is Greenpeace. And who else is hitting the wabble on this?
    3. +2
      5 August 2018 22: 14
      Quote: Masya Masya
      what nastiness is not at the bottom of the sea ... there is no greenpeace on them!

      So I really didn’t understand why Greenpeace was silent. Why drowned at a depth of 6 kilometers, and not in shallow water (at least in the same Florida), which would create an artificial reef for the resettlement of corals.
    4. 0
      6 August 2018 01: 49
      And liberals))) "Bush piromanites in the Pacific for money from pensioners and state employees" fellow In the Russian Federation, Akhejakova howled for a week, "forgive us, the ocean!" lol
  8. +5
    5 August 2018 20: 43
    "since no American aircraft carrier was sunk" request

    Something the author of the article confuses. Not one was safely drowned, even by the same Japanese. If only I looked into the wiki.
  9. +2
    5 August 2018 21: 02
    I do not understand. From the article:the designers who designed the new generation aircraft carrier needed data on the impact of modern weapons on bulky ships.... Then why was: The sappers placed dozens of charges on the aircraft carrier simulating the impact of torpedoes and cruise missiles. But to shoot at such a ship with real torpedoes and the Kyrgyz Republic is not fate ..? And the training and the real picture of hits, again the real amount of BP, with which you can specifically drown AB. Or a toad strangled for the cost of such an experiment?
  10. 0
    5 August 2018 21: 04
    A very bad omen ...
  11. 0
    5 August 2018 22: 17
    Then the beating began. The sappers placed dozens of charges on the aircraft carrier simulating the impact of torpedoes and cruise missiles. Explosions boomed for four weeks below and above the waterline. But the ship only swayed and remained afloat. And only on May 14, he began to roll over his nose, and then sank, sinking to a depth of about 6 kilometers.
    -------------------------
    It recalled the classic Sharikovskiy "we choked them, choked them."
  12. +3
    5 August 2018 22: 30
    I, as a sailor, have an idea, and even more so, the fact of the death of any ship, ours or someone else’s. Condolences ...
  13. 0
    5 August 2018 22: 36
    It would be interesting to know, four weeks to drown an aircraft carrier is the success of designers or the failure of anti-ship weapons?
    1. +1
      5 August 2018 23: 05
      Masochism...
    2. -1
      5 August 2018 23: 16
      Both.
      1) aircraft carriers are very tenacious. Much more tenacious than other types of ships
      2) For the sinking of an aircraft carrier, more powerful torpedoes and missiles are needed than those that
      into service.
      1. 0
        6 August 2018 05: 18
        in admiration for the United States you still don’t wish for the real one — ANY ship can be drowned, by the way much stronger “thick-skinned” battleships were lost in Pearl Harbor - 4 were sunk, 4 more were out of order.
        1. -2
          6 August 2018 10: 57
          Aircraft carriers have higher survivability. More independent hermetic compartments.
          1. 0
            10 August 2018 19: 12
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Aircraft carriers have higher survivability. More independent hermetic compartments.

            The Japanese deleted one of the American aircraft carriers from the list of combat personnel by hitting a single 227kg caliber bomb.
    3. 0
      6 August 2018 01: 45
      Yes what for to heat it? McCain won out with a single NUR completely carrier carrier))) And if the RCC is successful in getting a thread into the arsenal or tanks with fuel ... The tripods themselves will drown him))) After 4 weeks)))
  14. +1
    5 August 2018 23: 13
    The most important conclusion: aircraft carriers are very tenacious. Several anti-ship missiles and several torpedoes DO NOT send them to the bottom.
    1. LMN
      +5
      6 August 2018 00: 26
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The most important conclusion: aircraft carriers are very tenacious. Several anti-ship missiles and several torpedoes DO NOT send them to the bottom.

      So RCC and torpedoes did not check them. This is the question request
      Russia has, for example, anti-ship missiles "Dagger" or a torpedo "Poseidon" ... it will be a check hi
      1. +1
        6 August 2018 05: 49
        Quote: LMN
        Russia has, for example, anti-ship missiles "Dagger" or a torpedo "Poseidon" ... it will be a check

        That's when they get a dagger or Poseidon into a moving target, then it makes sense to dream about something.
      2. BAI
        0
        6 August 2018 08: 56
        torpedo "Poseidon" ..

        Poseidon against the ship, albeit a large one? You didn’t try to drive a 250 kg aerial bomb of sparrows?
      3. -2
        6 August 2018 10: 59
        "So RCC and torpedoes did not check them" ////
        ----
        Checked even harder. They attached the same explosive charge that in the head of a torpedo or rocket to the most vulnerable places and undermined it.
      4. 0
        10 August 2018 19: 18
        Quote: LMN
        Quote: voyaka uh
        The most important conclusion: aircraft carriers are very tenacious. Several anti-ship missiles and several torpedoes DO NOT send them to the bottom.

        So RCC and torpedoes did not check them. This is the question request
        Russia has, for example, anti-ship missiles "Dagger" or a torpedo "Poseidon" ... it will be a check hi

        The American aircraft carrier Yorktown was torpedoed first by an aircraft, then by a submarine. Drowned ...
  15. 0
    6 August 2018 01: 39
    To the question what for, Deutschland was renamed Lutzov. That there were no headlines like "Bush drowned America" tongue
  16. 0
    6 August 2018 02: 30
    they couldn’t drown for a long time ... it was necessary to help
  17. +1
    6 August 2018 05: 14
    A survivability test without jet kerosene and bombs on board? funny, in real life, even one large supersonic anti-ship missile (Granite, Basalt, Mosquito, aviation X-22) will pierce a solid hole on board, the rocket will fly a little further inside, igniting fuel and causing an explosion to cause such a force that control mechanisms will inevitably fail (control mechanisms ( movement of the ship) in addition, if it gets into the artillery cellars, the aircraft carrier will open from the inside like a can with botulism, it may not sink, but it will be repaired just before the end of the war.
  18. 0
    6 August 2018 05: 35
    Here's how to dispose of it, or else the cost of disposing of the first American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Enterprise can exceed $ 1 billion. On Friday, August 3, reports TASS with reference to the report of the US General Audit Office.
    The report itself takes 56 pages and is dedicated to evaluating measures taken to dispose of the ship. In it, in particular, it is indicated that the budget has insufficiently developed mechanisms for monitoring the recycling process and increasing the efficiency of this work. The military was advised to involve private companies in the risk assessment of the project.
    1. -1
      6 August 2018 05: 39
      Do you offer a nuclear carrier to blow up too? the cost of disposal is just that, due to the fact that it is necessary to safely cut and transfer to the disposal of nuclear reactors
  19. 0
    6 August 2018 07: 51
    This is certainly interesting, but it would be better to shoot at it with torpedoes and rockets, rather than exploding the charges of sappers. Although this shows that the aircraft carrier is not so easy to sink, as I advertise the Russian brave admirals.
    1. 0
      6 August 2018 08: 30
      I strongly doubt that it would occur to anyone to sink American AB with conventional ammunition .... One hell for an attack on AB will be WW3.
      IMHO
  20. +2
    6 August 2018 08: 50
    Quote: Rusland
    Greenpeace storms oil platforms, but drives whalers.
    Eccentric Americans, no one is going to drown them, it’s enough to knock down the antenna, and with breaking through the case, break some steam line or cable and everything else will complete the panic and love of American life.

    Do not throw hats. In WWII, mattress crews heroically fought for the vitality of their pelvis. The sailors died in the fire, from explosions of fuel and ammunition but fought and did not jump overboard in panic. Lost ships a few units
    1. -3
      6 August 2018 11: 04
      Interestingly, wooden shields are still used to close holes.
      Inside the aircraft carrier, boards are stored in several places. Special teams must in a few minutes put together a shield according to the size of the hole and close it. They train chest deep in cold water and with a timer.
      1. 0
        10 August 2018 19: 21
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Interestingly, wooden shields are still used to close holes.
        Inside the aircraft carrier, boards are stored in several places. Special teams must in a few minutes put together a shield according to the size of the hole and close it. They train chest deep in cold water and with a timer.

        At Midway Atoll, the hole in the deck of the aircraft carrier Yorktown was covered with an aluminum shield.
  21. BAI
    +1
    6 August 2018 08: 53
    Explosions boomed for four weeks below and above the waterline. But the ship only swayed and remained afloat.

    This is a good illustration of the debate on the topic “In one fell swoop the whole AUG killing).
  22. +2
    6 August 2018 09: 12
    In vain they drowned themselves ... Could give the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to practice ...
  23. 0
    6 August 2018 10: 26
    As an experiment, I suggest that Amers drown a couple more ships of the newer different classes. And then suddenly what’s wrong, but this one drowned somehow wrong!
  24. +1
    6 August 2018 12: 02
    CV-67 John F. Kennedy turned into a museum that barely keeps afloat due to lack of funding;

    Just like "Admiral Kuznetsov" wassat But he’s not a museum, but a supposedly military unit.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"