The Ministry of Defense will upgrade the Su-27 fighter jets

Following the results of the operation in Syria, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and enterprises of the military-industrial complex will begin work on the deep modernization of the L-705 complexes installed on Su-27CM fighters, the newspaper reports News.

These EW systems of the previous generation are standard for the most massive fighter aircraft VKS. According to the military, work on their modernization will begin this year. The systems are planned to be modified to the level of the modern aviation complex of electronic countermeasures (KREP) "Khibiny".

In the course of the upgrade, new software will be installed, the electronic filling stations will be changed. The units responsible for the detection and identification of radiation will be replaced by equipment used in the Khibiny. The updated equipment is integrated into the Su-27CM onboard system as much as possible.

Depending on the nature of the threat, the upgraded station will independently decide which types of interference will be able to secure the aircraft.

Also L-705 will be able to interact with other EW systems, such as “Lever-AV”, “Lever-BV”, “Khibiny” and “Khibiny-M”. Such interaction will help the complex to obtain information about the target, which is out of its zone of visibility.

In the future, the VKS plan to integrate all EW facilities into a unified system of monitoring of the electronic situation. The information received will be sent online to the command center, where special equipment will, if necessary, make changes to the map of the operational situation.

According to military experts, the upgraded EW complexes will increase the survivability of the aircraft and the effectiveness of the actions of the Russian Federation Space Forces as a whole.

Comments

[Gray brother]

If the enemy relies on stealth, then it is worth emphasizing the suppression of his means of detection - it is logical.

[seti]

It is not yet time to write off the Su-27 but it is time to carry out a partial modernization.
EW is one of the cornerstones. So the thing is necessary.

[spektr9]

It is not yet time to write off the Su-27

Yeah, 30 years have flown, we’ll still fly 100 years ... Yes, and there would have been a huge number of them, all 150 pcs have been replaced. India and then more su-xnumx ordered

[ALEXXX1983]

I wanted to write about the same thing, but there’s no reason.

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: spektr9

Yeah, 30 years have flown, we’ll still fly 100 years ... Yes, and there would have been a huge number of them, all 150 pcs have been replaced. India and then more su-xnumx ordered

Why not? We have F-15 C / D / I after upgrading to 2040 g will fly. And 150 Su-27 is quite a lot. This is more than all military vehicles in Germany.

[spektr9]

This is more than all military vehicles in Germany

And many times more Zimbabwean cars

We have an F-15 C / D / I after upgrading to 2040 g

And what, it’s kind of violet for me that you will fly, in the same Zimbabwean Air Force, the moment 23 flies so far, will you order them to equal?
ps If there are only 500 fighters in our entire vast homeland, then at least quality must be taken ..

[aws4]

Zimbabwean Air Force did not crush Soviet fighters ... or remind you how many Israelis shot down Soviet fighters?

[nikoliski]

Who was at the helm? In any battle on technology other than TTX, there is still significance who controls it, the Egyptians are the same rare gouging, about “fighting to the end” not at all about them.

[mvg]

So not only the Araps were shot down, and our pilots got it hard. Not in such quantity, of course, but don’t worry at all ... Up to the rejection of air battles.

[aws4]

thanks comrade !!!! patriots sometimes need to slow down

[nikoliski]

Americans have already made you hidden propaganda an enemy of their country, congratulations

[aws4]

I repent you revealed me

[andrey-ivanov]

One single case of a tactical ambush of the Israelis is not "hard to get." An ambush is a priori enterprise, in most cases, doomed to success.

[mvg]

Who prevented us from setting an ambush? After all, a specialist flew in to clearly demonstrate how to fight. And ... Yes, and specialists (advisers) were there during all the wars with the Jews .. and technology be healthy. Almost the Moscow-Cairo bridge.

[VO3A]

If the enemy relies on stealth, then it is worth emphasizing the suppression of his means of detection - it is logical.

Just a terrific conclusion .. In stealth mode, all radars and other emitting systems are turned off and operate in passive mode, except for the ECO.

EW is one of the cornerstones

.
Another pearl. How can a response system provide an advantage? If you enable it in advance, then it will be instantly destroyed ... And the author of the article is going to get information for her ?! Full idiocy ... We have a lot of believers in the EW forum. Stupid ...
And the author of the article is trying to present it as a magical weapon ... In give, that's enough
make people laugh ....
And for a long time there are missiles that fly to the radiation of either radar stations or EW stations and they are homing ....

[Vlad.by]

Aim the PRR missile at the EW station of a maneuvering fighter.
I'd like to see ...

[VO3A]

And are these missiles really needed, because this maneuvering target will not fulfill the task ....

[Vlad.by]

what’s stopping her?

[Black sniper]

But do not forget about your stealth technology!

[Gray brother]

Electronic warfare and stealth are poorly combined on the same machine, I would say that they do not combine at all. However, such different concepts can still be combined tactically - the chess game will succeed.

[Horse, people and soul]

EW leads to the exposure of the entire screen on enemy radars. Stealth does not give any light (actually, it does).

The result is the same - the enemy cannot launch rockets.

So ... EW and stealth in essence of application are one and the same, although in physics of application they are absolutely different things.

When stealth is used, they are unaware of the presence of an enemy in the sky.
When electronic warfare is used, they know about the presence of the enemy, but because of the total exposure they don’t know where exactly he is flying.

So, the result is one and the same. Nearly.

[Gray brother]

Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub

EW leads to the exposure of the entire screen on enemy radars.

EW provides radiation that can be visited, however, using the same EW, due to three or four cars, you can create an electronic phantom on which long-range missiles will be aimed.
Early warning radars are seen by stealth aircraft, but give only their approximate location, plus or minus bast
"Total exposure" is not always possible - it all depends on the power.
Why not bring your stealth planes to the enemy with the radars turned off in front of a group of "ordinary" fighters equipped with electronic warfare systems? It will be a surprise.

[nikoliski]

I don’t agree, the operational electronic warfare station is a very tasty target for any anti-radar missile (it is aimed passively at any radio emission), by the way for anti-ship missile systems, the installation of active jamming by the ship was even more “attractive” for the missile

[andrey-ivanov]

No, not for any. There is a certain frequency range to which the GOS of one or another PRR reacts.

[nikoliski]

I mean the range of the radar and stations of active interference (which clog the radar with waves of the same length), here for them, any radiation

[Horse, people and soul]

Combined.

But not at the same time.

[Gray brother]

Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub

But not at the same time.

On one plane not. But who is stopping you from using different planes together?

[Horse, people and soul]

The enemy will not be invisible in the radar field in Russia.

It is for the Papuans the enemy is invisible.

[Gray brother]

Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub

The enemy will not be invisible in the radar field in Russia.

Well, he will try to thin this field - somewhere it will work out, somewhere not, somewhere he himself will be thinned.

[RASKAT]

First of all, you need to change the RLPK-27VESh and its older modifications. Engines with increased resource and reduced consumption. Avionics and new weapons systems, the same Hephaestus would not hurt. And then think about EW. More than 100 aircraft require such modernization in our country; it would be nice to bring them to the level of multi-purpose ones.
I think so.

[Gray brother]

Quote: RASKAT

First of all, it is necessary to change the RLPK-27VESh and its older modifications. Engines with increased resource and reduced consumption. Avionics and new weapons systems, the same Hephaestus would not hurt.

Hephaestus is on earth. They are trying to crush us with dominance in the air, but we can only oppose air defense and electronic warfare, and the available aircraft, it is clear what kind of aircraft we will have in the majority in the next couple of decades - we have to dance from them.

[dnestr74]

And then an article will come out that is not inferior to SU 57 in all respects)))))))))

[Jerk]

We’ll copy the article from Israel, they have the F-15 won the F-35 are in no way inferior - and all the liberals assent without question

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

And we will have a “new” generation aircraft 4 ++++++++++++

[Vadim237]

Of course not inferior - the weapons of both are the same.

[mashinist]

I thought more than Dryers and there are 45 Su-27SM and 14 Su-27SM3 on the wiki ... when we already have planes in the hundreds

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

Never, military doctrine is purely defense. Although it also seems absurd to such a huge country, in principle, there are not very many fighters.

[helmi8]

Quote: mashinist

and they are on the wiki 45 Su-27SM and 14 Su-27SM3

And I have a wiki .... huge Did you understand what you wrote? Or should the Ministry of Defense upload all data on the number and technical support to the Network?

[mashinist]

Yeah, right .. there are hundreds of brand new and polished ones, and one misinformation is written on the wiki. What nonsense. I agree that the wiki may not take into account mothballed cars or the number of newest units such as su 57, but in general the order of numbers is correct!

[san4es]

The updated equipment is integrated as much as possible into the on-board system of the Su-27SM.

TV weapons
Posted Mar 28 2014 ...

[1vlad19]

It is interesting at what plant will be introduced modernization? Are the Su-27s, Irkutsk, Novosibirsk, Voronezh occupied in the Koms "Su-35 line"?

[Tahtvjd2868]

“In the future, the VKS plans to integrate all electronic warfare systems into a single system for monitoring the electronic environment. The information received will be sent online to the command center, where special equipment will make changes to the map of the operational situation, if necessary” - someone here on the site scoffed at our network-centrism do not do ... What is this not an element ???

[lopvlad]

will modernize Su-27 fighters

in accordance with IMF precepts, the economic bloc with glory of Nabiulina and Siluanov does not give money for new planes. As practice shows, it’s not enough to find excellent weapons that have no analogues in the world, and most importantly to establish their mass production and enlistment.
The West will do everything to prevent the rearmament of the army into a new weapon in Russia, and so far it has succeeded.

[shans2]

this commentator is a “popadan” from the 90s)))

[Vadim851]

Quite a reasonable solution, the Su-27 platform has great opportunities for modernization. Americans with F-15 squeeze all the juices for example

[voyaka uh]

That the Su-27 and the like, that the F-15 has one problem. Huge EPR. Their radars are whipped from afar and very distinctly.

[ZVS]

Well, if you were planning to upgrade fighters of 30-40 years of age, it becomes clear that the rearmament of the army with modern models of equipment gave a severe glitch. Do not see fifth-generation aircraft in the Air Force.
They would be tied to the Olympics in the troops, and the money would be sent to the construction of new weapons.
Played Shoigu in biathlon and air darts.

[Protos]

Quote: aws4

Zimbabwean Air Force did not crush Soviet fighters ... or remind you how many Israelis shot down Soviet fighters?

How many Soviet ones? And Schaub are not stupid Arabs insider?

[Protos]

Quote: SU

Well, if you were planning to upgrade fighters of 30-40 years of age, it becomes clear that the rearmament of the army with modern models of equipment gave a severe glitch. Do not see fifth-generation aircraft in the Air Force.
They would be tied to the Olympics in the troops, and the money would be sent to the construction of new weapons.
Played Shoigu in biathlon and air darts.

But what interferes with one another ?!

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

Wise guys, with good electronic warfare, the plane may even crash. Do not forget what an altimeter is. It will work. Stealth technologies are not for all types of radars. I write, because they taught me how to find planes in the army. I cannot turn off all electronics, the plane cannot. It’s not PO 2. Fly visually over the folds of the terrain. There, when interfering with an unmanned aerial vehicle, it falls. Therefore, it does not know where to fly.