The construction of the next landing ship of the San Antonio type has begun in the USA

37
The United States has begun building a new assault ship, the San Antonio type. At the shipyard of Huntington Ingalls Industries in Pascagoula, Mississippi, a steel cutting ceremony was held for the USS Richard M. McCool, Jr. transport dock. (LPD-29), transmits "Warspot" with a link to the portal navaltoday.com.

The construction of the next landing ship of the San Antonio type has begun in the USA




This ship will be the last 13 in the series of amphibious assault ships of the San Antonio Flight I type, although the construction of 12 ships of this type was originally planned. In the future plans of the US Navy is the construction of an upgraded series of Flight II, which will replace in the US Navy landing ships-docks such as Whidbey Island.

The ship is quite large, its length is 208 m, width is 32 m, the total displacement is 25300 tons, the draft of the vessel does not exceed 7 m. The vehicle is able to simultaneously carry two amphibious assault aircrafts and one LCUS, fourteen amphibious armored personnel carriers and no less xnumx paratroopers. If desired, it is possible to accommodate a larger number of personnel through the use of additional premises, but with minimal comfort conditions. The ship has a helipad in the stern that can accommodate four helicopters or two convertiplane MV-700В Osprey. The maximum vessel speed is the 22 node. The crew, including the wing, is about 22 people. The armament of the ship consists of two eight-charge fire fighting gears of the 400 XM for the Sea Sparrow missile system (41 missile ammunition), two General Purpose 64 RAM launchers from the General Dynamics company; two 31-mm AU "Bushmaster" Mk 30, two 46-mm machine gun Mk 12,7. In addition, on the ships of this type there are four PUs of the false targets Mk 26 SRB36C system, the Nulka false targets system, the Nixi SLQ-0 hydroacoustic countermeasure system, and the EW AN / SLQ-25A system.
  • navaltoday.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    2 August 2018 09: 51
    Maybe I didn’t understand ... this ship will not approach the shore? No ramp?
    1. +2
      2 August 2018 09: 55
      ard Today, 09: 51 New
      Maybe I didn’t understand ... this ship will not approach the shore? No ramp?

      .. they will put people in these glands, and to the shore, and there - to someone as lucky, and who will swim ...
      Transport is capable of simultaneously transporting two LCACS hovercraft, one LCU landing boat, fourteen amphibious armored personnel carriers
      .
    2. +8
      2 August 2018 10: 01
      Quote: Vard
      This ship does not fit to shore? No ramp?

      He has a stern docking chamber for two LCACs. The diagram clearly shows:
    3. MPN
      +5
      2 August 2018 10: 02
      Quote: Vard
      Maybe I didn’t understand ... this ship will not approach the shore? No ramp?

      draft of the vessel does not exceed 7 m.
      What shore is it? Marine facilities are also provided for disembarkation. and air ... Already the 13th boat, a dozen can (comfortably) 7000 land at a time ...
      1. +3
        2 August 2018 10: 21
        this DTD type "San Antonio", in the threatened period or during 3MV, you still need to cross the ocean and not run into our "Cephalopod"
        1. MPN
          +2
          2 August 2018 10: 33
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          and don't run into our Cephalopod

          good You need at least 13 pieces to interfere ... :))
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          still need to cross the ocean

          What is there to go then? Bering Strait go?
          1. +2
            2 August 2018 11: 06
            Quote: MPN
            What is there to go then? Bering Strait go?

            laughing And get captured Kamchadalam !!! good
          2. 0
            2 August 2018 11: 06
            What is there to go then? Bering Strait go?

            in this case, “hi” will fly to amers from Kamchatka, AB Elizovo, MiG-31 with anti-ship missiles Dagger
            * Moreover, the San Antonio DTD does not have ice reinforcement, it is a single-hull barge
            1. -1
              3 August 2018 17: 54
              you don’t get enough daggers and they have many ships
              1. 0
                5 August 2018 12: 50
                it’s cheaper and much faster to upgrade the Mig-31 and Tu-22М3 and rivet the RCC Dagger and X-32. And let the Americans build destroyers with aircraft carriers so that the buck will collapse faster (!)
      2. +2
        2 August 2018 10: 36
        Marine facilities are also provided for disembarkation. and air.


        Look, Pavel, the convertiplanes have taken root. They have already taken their niche. Brought means the car to the point. And we are behind.
        1. +1
          2 August 2018 21: 19
          Quote: dauria
          Brought means the car to the point. And we are behind.

          A race participant may lag behind, we are not on the track.
    4. +3
      2 August 2018 10: 27
      Most likely, you don’t understand anything at all on this issue, the landing of troops with us and “them” takes place in different ways .. wink
    5. +7
      2 August 2018 10: 33
      Quote: Vard
      This ship does not fit to shore? No ramp?

      To the shore - it's not like yesterday, it's the day before yesterday and is practiced only in the Russian Navy!
      1. +1
        2 August 2018 12: 00
        Sergey, you don’t bend your wand .. the day before yesterday .. And today, in your opinion, from the death star, teleport ... laughing You can’t go far on boats and amphibians, our BDKs for capturing afrobabuins are very good, better than Amer’s ... Another thing is when the coast is protected .. neither to our landing, not theirs .. you will not envy !!!
        1. +1
          2 August 2018 12: 24
          Quote: igorka357
          our BDKs for capturing afrobabuins are very good

          Igor, to capture afrobobuins you can completely do without BDK wink
          Quote: igorka357
          .here neither to our landing, not theirs .. you will not envy !!!

          what Theirs in this regard will be more tenacious, because ours will have to drown directly from the BDK!
          Quote: igorka357
          Sergey, do not bend your wand.

          Yes, I would be glad, but this is the prose of life!
        2. +1
          2 August 2018 14: 15
          Quote: igorka357
          You can’t get far on boats and amphibians, our BDKs for capturing afrobabuins are very good, better than Amer’s ...

          Afrobabuins now may well have fired from the shore with something controlled. And in such a situation, it is better to land troops with small high-speed means from a base ship located outside the effective fire of most of the coastal defense. Than to creep to the coast at low speed with one big ship, with the entire landing force in an osprey in the hold. For such a purpose, you can even get out of the mortar.
      2. +2
        2 August 2018 12: 20
        I agree with you, and besides, those BDKs that are part of the Navy built more than 30 years ago are generally silent about Tapirs. Gren and Morgunov are essentially ships of the 1174th century ... The saddest thing is that we had modern ships, BDK. 90, but everyone became a victim of the 10s, and it didn’t work out with the Mistrals ... As a result, after 2 years, there will be XNUMX BDKs in our fleet, it’s especially difficult for me, like a marine, to see this, but I don’t see any other scenario.
        1. 0
          2 August 2018 12: 36
          Quote: WATCH_OFFICER
          The saddest thing is that we had modern ships, BDK. Xnumx

          I agree Ivan Tarava was a good boat!
          Quote: WATCH_OFFICER
          As a result, in 10 years 2 BDK will remain in our fleet

          Where is such data from?
          Quote: WATCH_OFFICER
          it’s especially difficult for me, like a marine, to realize this, but I don’t see another alignment

          Do you think that in a future war there will be a landing site? Yes, and what will it be, a future war ???
          1. 0
            2 August 2018 14: 13
            1. Concerning 2 BDK
            Tapirs and Poles will finally work out their resources, and in about 10 years Gren will remain, and I hope the completed Morgunov.
            2. Regarding a future war.
            You yourself answered your own question. No one knows what it will be ...
            1. 0
              2 August 2018 14: 43
              We also don’t know what amphibious forces the Russian Marines will possess in 10 years !!!
              1. 0
                2 August 2018 15: 57
                So, just in order to have landing assault forces in 10 years, you need to lay them down now !!!
                1. 0
                  3 August 2018 07: 15
                  Quote: WATCH_OFFICER
                  they must be laid now

                  Comrade officer in charge, I’ll correct you a little, these ships need to be designed now! 5 years ago there was an attempt to get hold of 2 UDC and build their own request did not work out! But they vaguely anticipate me - work on this issue is underway (ave. 11711 was not allowed into the series what and this leads to good thoughts)
                  drinks hi
            2. 0
              2 August 2018 23: 03
              No one knows what it will be ...


              Well, you guys have agreed ... recourse I hope the General Staff knows at least? Or they also wonder- "Go there, I don’t know where. Bring that, I don’t know what"? Previously, at least in general terms and figures within two months, the layout was given for the third world war, even for cadets. I remember in the first year of college, they also talked about 120 million and about Bay of Biscay. So to speak, immediately and forehead, so as not to be surprised. And later on in details about a breakthrough of the front with a tactical nuclear strike and a tank passage to the non-infected side until the enemy draws up reserves. Well, and every little thing, such as chopping down trees on a slope next to the trenches, so as not to leave landmarks for the enemy ...
              Or are the military now teaching ballet and dancing?
              1. 0
                3 August 2018 07: 08
                Quote: dauria
                I remember in the first year of college, they also talked about 120 millions and about Bay of Biscay. So to speak, immediately and forehead, so as not to be surprised.

                what Yes Yes! laughing The dream of generals and marshals about a tank attack on the English Channel and Biscay crashed against Afghanistan, and the war was lost not on the battlefield, but in Moscow at Old Square, house number 4 !!!! A paradox, isn't it?
                So, Alexei, what will be the third world ??? what
    6. 0
      2 August 2018 16: 12
      they don't have 13, there is 14 ship
  2. 0
    2 August 2018 11: 02
    Quote: Romario_Argo
    this DTD type "San Antonio", in the threatened period or during 3MV, you still need to cross the ocean and not run into our "Cephalopod"

    They will come first, and only then they will declare war
    1. 0
      2 August 2018 11: 59
      All the ships of the probable enemy took aim at one moment, it was like that in the USSR, it is like that now, so even near our shore .. these "shells" will burst in minutes, without even having time to land the troops!
      1. +1
        2 August 2018 12: 27
        Quote: igorka357
        All the ships of the probable adversary took aim at one moment,

        recourse as well as ours .....
        Quote: igorka357
        these "shells" will burst in minutes, before even landing!

        the grandmother said in two, because there would be a big racket before the landing!
  3. 0
    2 August 2018 11: 18
    well ship so ship no worse no better
  4. 0
    2 August 2018 11: 29
    Crimean MDK
  5. +2
    2 August 2018 12: 01
    ... The ship is large enough, its length is 208 m, width - 32 m,

    hi ... ship bypass recourse

    USS San Antonio (LPD-17) ... June 25, 2016.
  6. +1
    2 August 2018 13: 26
    Quote: Romario_Argo
    this DTD type "San Antonio", in the threatened period or during 3MV, you still need to cross the ocean and not run into our "Cephalopod"

    Oh my God!!! A new toy for cheers-patriots - "Cephalopod". Damn, you still remember the "Armata", which will sink these transports for one or two ....
    Nah.rena still non-existent (and it is not known whether it will exist) unit, which in general can be engaged in anti-submarine defense, should sink enemy landing ships in the ocean .... am
    1. -1
      2 August 2018 23: 33
      Thank you, it is always nice to read your comments, unbiased, reasonable and informative, unfortunately there have been extremely few such commentators on VO ...
  7. +1
    2 August 2018 17: 21
    WHERE are the Russian landing ships? There is no money, well, you hold on >>>
    1. 0
      2 August 2018 18: 24
      Quote: Adimius38
      WHERE are the Russian landing ships? There is no money, well, you hold on >>>

      The funny thing is that the money is here on the sidelines. The Navy can not decide in any way - but what exactly does it need within the existing budget? Either BDK, or DVKD, or DTRD, or UDC. what
      The same Grena was delayed by the construction, not for financial reasons, but because of regular changes in TK.
  8. +1
    3 August 2018 19: 29
    a nice big beautiful ship, our sailors only dream of such

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"