Russian victories in the Livonian War

17
460 years ago, 18 July 1558, the Russian army under the command of governor Peter Shuisky took the city of Dorpat (Old Russian Yuriev). The 1558 campaign of the year was successful for the Russian kingdom - our army took the 20 cities of Livonia from May to October.

General situation



In the middle of the XVI century, several factors came together that led to the Livonian War. Among them was the decline and degradation of Livonia, the German knightly orders, which settled in the Baltic. A “Livonian legacy” was formed, in which Sweden, Denmark, United Poland and Lithuania, Russia were interested. The Livonian Order was in decline, but it had a rich legacy - strategic territories, developed cities, strong fortresses, control over trade routes, population and other resources. At the same time, one can single out maritime (Baltic) and continental (Livonian proper) issues.

The Baltic question affected mainly the interests of the Hansa, Sweden and Denmark, who fought for supremacy on the Baltic Sea in order to use this monopoly to implement their great-power plans. So, Sweden needed money and people to fight Denmark. Also, the Swedes wanted to establish a blockade of the Russian state on the Baltic and close the Russian trade in Sweden. To do this, it was necessary to establish control over the exit from the Gulf of Finland. But, having failed in creating an anti-Russian coalition involving Livonia and Poland, and then having unsuccessfully fought with Russia (1554), the Swedish king Gustav abandoned his plans for a while.

The continental issue affected the strategic interests of the Russian state and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The King of Poland and the Grand Duke of Lithuania Sigismund II tried, by absorbing Livonia, to compensate for the expansion to the Black Sea that had faded by that time. The Poles faced powerful adversaries in the south: the Crimean Khanate and the Turkish Empire. As a result, Poland was not able to use the “Kiev inheritance” - obtaining lands of South-Western Russia, in order to establish itself in the Black Sea region. Therefore, Poland and Lithuania needed control over the Livonian lands and access to the Baltic.

Moscow needed to control the intermediary trade system built over the centuries through the Baltic cities and ensure free access to the markets of Central Europe and access to European technologies. The Baltic states were also necessary for Russia for military-strategic reasons. It is worth noting that Ivan the Terrible and his boyars government in the first half of the 1550-s was not up to Livonia. The main and most dangerous enemy at that time was the Crimean horde, behind which stood Turkey. Russia took Kazan and Astrakhan, and fought for the Horde inheritance with the Crimea. In Moscow at that time they even hoped for a final solution of the Tatar question by subjugating the Crimea. At the same time, Moscow first turned its activities in the western (Lithuanian) direction. Prisoner of the Starodub War 1535 - 1537. the truce was extended to 1542, 1549, 1554 and 1556, despite certain tensions between the two great powers. The main enemy was the Crimea and Turkey behind it. Therefore, in Moscow they even worked out the idea of ​​a Russian-Lithuanian anti-Crimean alliance. Moscow also probed the soil for an anti-Turkish alliance with Vienna and Rome.

In the Crimean Khanate in this period, the anti-Russian party prevailed, the core of which was represented by representatives of the nobility, subsidized from Lithuania and people from Kazan and Astrakhan. This party had a strong influence on Devlet-Giray, a rather cautious man who did not want to aggravate relations with Moscow. In addition, Moscow’s offensive policy worried Porto. Istanbul decided to increase pressure on the Russian state with the help of the Crimean horde. All this led to the period of a long war between Moscow and the Crimea, which lasted a quarter of a century, right up to the death of Devlet Giray in 1577. This intense and bloody struggle demanded from the Russian kingdom a lot of strength and resources. The fate of Eastern Europe was decided on the Crimean "Ukraine". Devlet Giray in the year 1571 burned Moscow. The turning point in favor of Russia occurred only in the summer of 1572, during the decisive battle of Molodi, when the Russian army, under the command of M. Vorotinsky, destroyed the Crimean-Turkish army.

As a result, the clash between Moscow and Vilna over Livonia was a continuation of the former Russian-Lithuanian wars over the Western Russian lands, which had previously been under Lithuanian rule and domination in Eastern Europe. Finally, this struggle ended only after the Third Section of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (except for the modern history).


Dorpat on engraving 1553 of the year

Livonian problem

Livonia in this confrontation between Moscow and the Crimean Khanate and Poland for a long time was not even of secondary importance. Moscow did not even have direct links with the Livonian Confederation. Contacts with her were maintained through the Novgorod and Pskov governors. After the truce was signed in 1503, which ended the war between Livonia and the Russian state, peace came to the north-west for a long time. However, while Moscow was tied up with confrontation with Lithuania, Kazan and the Crimea, problems began to accumulate on the Livonian borderlands. Step by step, mutual claims of Novgorod, Pskov, Ivangorodians and Livonians (first of all Revelians and Narvites) were accumulating.

First of all, the disputes concerned trade affairs. On the Livonian borderland began a trade war. It was painful for Moscow, since important goods came through Livonia, including those of strategic importance — primarily non-ferrous and precious metals (at that time there was no production in Russia). Silver was needed for minting coins, lead, tin and copper for military purposes. Livonian cities sought to maintain a monopoly in the trade of Russia with Western Europe that was so beneficial for them. And the Livonian authorities prevented the export of goods to Russia, the Livonian Landtag repeatedly imposed bans on the export of silver, lead, tin and copper (as well as other goods) to Russia. Trying to circumvent these obstacles, Russian merchants were looking for workarounds. Thus, in Dorpat, Revel and Narva, they were unhappy with the attempts of Russian merchants from Novgorod, Pskov and Ivangorod to abandon the traditional land routes and move on to transport goods by sea, including through hired Swedish schooners.

In addition, Moscow was important access to European technology, science. In 1648, the German emperor Charles V gave permission to the clever intermediary Schlitte to recruit specialists, including the military - gunsmiths, engineers, etc., and also to restore trade weapons and strategic materials with the Russians. This decision caused serious concern in Livonia, Poland and Lithuania. The Order of the Master Von der Recke and the Polish King Sigismund II strongly opposed this decision. As a result, under the pressure of Poland and Livonia, the decision was canceled. The specialists hired by Schlitte were intercepted in North German and Livonian cities. Naturally, Ivan Vasilyevich was very angry with the Livonian Master. The ban on the supply of weapons, strategic materials and military specialists was very painful for Moscow, which at that time was struggling hard against Kazan.

It is also worth noting the role of the “Novgorod party”. Despite all the political changes and loss of independence, Veliky Novgorod still remained the most important trade and economic center of the Russian state, and together with Pskov, it exclusively owned the right to trade with the West through Livonia and the Ganza. The house of St. Sophia participated in this trade, the Novgorod Archbishop Macarius (the future Metropolitan of All Russia) also took part in it. An influential clan of Shuisky was associated with Novgorod and Pskov. As a result, in Novgorod and Moscow there was a rather influential group interested in the preservation and development of trade in the north-west. Also, do not forget the “Novgorod force” - until 1 / 6 all the children of the boyars and nobles of the Russian state of the mid-16th century. Novgorod servicemen experienced land hunger - there were more of them, but no land, the estates became shallow and crushed, and it was becoming more difficult to ascend to the sovereign service. This led to border conflicts on the border in Lithuania (the Polotsk lands), Livonia and Sweden. They were mutual. And the expansion in the north-western direction could give the Novgorod nobles the desired booty and land for local distribution.

For the time being, Ivan the Terrible and his closest associates were passionate about Eastern affairs, the struggle against Kazan and the Crimea, without paying any serious influence on Livonian affairs. The extra war the government of Ivan Vasilyevich was not needed. In the military-strategic sense, Moscow was advantageous to maintain a weak, fragmented, unable to be a serious military threat to the Livonian Confederation. Livonia was needed as a buffer and communication channel with Western Europe. And Moscow was ready to keep such a neighbor, provided, if not friendly, then at least a neutral position, providing Russian merchants and diplomats free movement, as well as uninterrupted arrival of the necessary specialists, craftsmen and goods. That is, to have at hand a weak, torn by internal contradictions, Livonia was more profitable than if it strengthened Sweden or Poland and Lithuania. In this case, the threat from the west and northwest increased many times over.

But soon everything changed. The current situation violated Poland. In 1552, the Polish king Sigismund II and the Prussian duke Albrecht, under the pretext of the “Russian threat”, agreed on the “incorporation” of Livonia into Poland. In 1555, Albrecht proposed an interesting idea - the vacant position of a coadjutor (Catholic titular bishop with the right to inherit the episcopal chair) under the relative of Albrecht from Riga Archbishop Wilhelm was to be occupied by a “promising young man” Christoph of Mecklenburg. His appointment led to a conflict of interest of the Livonian Order (then headed by von Galen) and the Archbishop of Riga. It was then that Sigismund could get into this conflict, defending the interests of the Riga archbishop.

The Polish king liked the plan. An opportune moment came, Moscow was occupied by a conflict with Sweden and Tatar affairs. In January, the 1556 of the year, the Riga Chapter, chose Christophe as coadjutor. Magister Galen refused to acknowledge this choice and encouraged the choice of von Fürstenberg, the enemy of the Archbishop of Riga and the enemy of rapprochement with Poland, as deputy-coadjutor. In the summer of war in Livonia. Wilhelm and Christoph suffered a defeat. But Poland received a reason to intervene in the affairs of Livonia. In 1557, Sigismund and Albrecht moved troops to Livonia. Master Furstenberg, who inherited the deceased Galen, was forced to make an agreement in the town Allow. The let-out treaty hurt Russia's interests, since Livonia agreed to an alliance with Poland directed against the Russians.

It is clear that this has all superimposed on the already existing economic war and border incidents between Russia and Livonia. Negotiations in Moscow and Livonia (they went through Novgorod and Pskov), which went on from 1550, exacerbated the extension of the truce. Ivan the Terrible did not order his Novgorod and Pskov governors "dati truce" Livonians. Moscow set three basic conditions for Livonia: 1) free pass “from the seashore of servicemen and all kinds of craftsmen”; 2) pass to Russia of goods of paramount importance, the free pass of merchants; 3) the requirement from the Dorpat bishop to pay t. "Yuriev tribute." At the 1554 talks of the year, it turned out that the Russians consider paying tribute to the long-standing duty of the "Bethlehem Germans." Moreover, the okolnichy A. Adashev and the Deacon of the Ambassadorial Order I. Viskovaty not only demanded the payment of tribute, but also all the “arrears” that had accumulated over the past decades. The amount was huge. When the Livonian ambassadors heard about this, according to the Livonian chronicler F. Nienstedt, they “didn’t jump a little from their foreheads and they absolutely did not know how to be here; they did not have any mandate to agree and negotiate tribute and did not dare to ask for a deduction either. ” At the same time, Adashev and Viskovaty hinted transparently that if there would be no tribute, the Russian sovereign himself would come and take what was rightfully his and old.

There was nowhere to go, and the Livonian ambassadors had to yield to the pressure of the Russian negotiators, who, as it turned out, were very well prepared and worked through all the questions. In the text of contracts concluded between the Livonians and governors of Novgorod and Pskov, provisions were made on the obligations of Livonia to pay Ivan the Terrible "tribute to all of Yuryev, and old pledges from all of Yuryevsk (the Dorpat bishopric - Author.) after collecting the required tribute "as from old times," send after the end of the 3-year period. Trade was also facilitated and Livonia should not have entered into an alliance with Poland and Lithuania.

At the end of 1557, a new Livonian embassy arrived in Moscow, wanting to extend the truce. To make the Livonian "partners" more compliant, Moscow decided to hold a powerful military demonstration on the border with Livonia. And during the negotiations themselves, the king conducted a review of the troops. However, the Livonians refused to pay the bill. Upon learning that the "idle" Livonian ambassadors did not bring money, they were only going to bargain about its size, Ivan Vasilyevich was angry. To prevent a war, the Livonians agreed to the complete freedom of trade, including weapons, which they did not demand from them before. But this concession was not enough. Adashev and Viskovaty demanded that the conditions of the 1554 be fulfilled.

When it became clear that the Livonians did not intend to “correct” at all (apparently, the tsar already knew about the Posvol agreements), in Moscow they decided to punish the Germans. They do not want to be good, it will be bad. Prudently collected on the border with the Livonian Confederation, the Russian army was immediately sent to force the Germans to understand the world. And failure to pay Yuriev tribute was the reason for the war. Obviously, at the first stage, Ivan the Terrible was not going to include Livonia or its part in Russia and to fight with the Livonians seriously. He had enough worries without it. The Russian campaign was supposed to intimidate the Germans so that they would go to the agreement Moscow needed.

Russian victories in the Livonian War

Noble Muscovite rider. A. de Bruin. Engraving of the late 16th century

To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    18 July 2018 06: 08
    Russian victories in the Livonian War

    there were victories, but there was no victory .....
    1. +2
      18 July 2018 08: 59
      It has long been said about this that even the union of several states led by Sweden could not resist Russia for demographic reasons. The population of this union was at least FIVE times less than the Russian. Usually the war wins the one who has more people.

      In addition, Moscow was important access to European technology, science. In 1648, the German emperor Charles V gave permission to the clever mediator Schlitte to recruit specialists, including the military - gunsmiths, engineers, etc., and also to restore the trade in arms and strategic materials with the Russians


      this touches in general. What kind of "strategic materials" that the Germans have in Charles 5 must be assumed to be the Holy Roman Empire of the Germans SRIG? Titanium, uranium, what? if “strategic materials” means silver, then the question arises, how did a Russian state, which at that time could exist 600 years without its own silver? Those. they want to say that Russia ALWAYS depended on Western silver and developed, waged wars, but they would have taken the same SIGG and not given silver to Russia and Russia could not pay tribute to the Horde, nor could they equip an army or establish trade within themselves . In short, the nonsense is quiet, as usual.
      1. 0
        18 July 2018 12: 31
        And hello again! laughing
        Let me answer your questions.
        Quote: Bar1
        It has long been said about this that even the union of several states headed by Sweden could not resist Russia for demographic reasons. The population of this union was at least FIVE times smaller than Russian.

        Not sure. The population density in Europe was significantly higher than in Russia. It would be nice if you provided specific figures with sources to confirm your thesis.
        Quote: Bar1
        Usually the war is won by the one who has more people.

        Disagree categorically. There are many examples in history when small armies turned out to be stronger than numerous, and states with a huge population submitted to small but belligerent neighbors. Examples are needed, or do you rummage?
        Quote: Bar1
        What kind of "strategic materials" that the Germans have Karl 5? I suppose this is the Holy Roman Empire of the Germans of the SRIG? Titan, uranium, what?

        Silver, tin, lead, copper. None of this was mined in Russia at that time. Silver is needed for the mint, copper and tin for casting bronze guns, lead for bullets and many other needs.
        Quote: Bar1
        as a Russian state, which at that time 600let could exist without its silver?

        Trade, only trade. Therefore, the access to the sea was always important, and therefore the princes clung to Novgorod the Great and the Volga Route.
        Quote: Bar1
        Those. they want to say that Russia ALWAYS depended on western silver and at the same time developed, waged wars, but they could have taken the same SRIG and did not give silver to Russia and Russia could not pay tribute to the Horde, neither could they equip the army, nor establish trade .

        Not only from the west. A lot of silver came from the east, especially in the early stages of development. At one time, Arab dirhams were generally something like a dollar now — an international currency. There were no silver deposits in Russia.
        Quote: Bar1
        In short, a lull, as usual.

        No need to be so self-critical that you are. This time you didn’t write anything really stupid, but, as I understand it, the day is just beginning ... smile
        1. +2
          18 July 2018 14: 38
          are you there, how will you confirm your linguistic habits or everything that your irrepressible talker said before? Then what's the point of talking to you talker?

          Quote: Trilobite Master
          Not sure. The population density in Europe was significantly higher than in Russia. It would be nice if you provided specific figures with sources to confirm your thesis.


          which europe? phew, in truth, he looks into a book, sees a fig, as if the saying was written from you.
          Who fought in the Livonian war? Countries with today a critically small population of the Baltic states and the Swedes, the Danes.
          As for Lithuania, I don’t have a full understanding of what kind of country this was and how it could fight against Russia. Most of Lithuania is Belarus with its Orthodox and Russian-speaking population. The Orthodox do not fight against the Orthodox. Present-day Lithuania is a zhmudy, of which it is -3mil., And by the time of the Livonian war most likely there wasn’t at all, how could they fight?
          From the figures it is known that in the time of Peter the Great, Russia had -20mil.ch. therefore, by the time of the Livonian War in Russia, there were about 7-8 mil.
          The only people who have a decent population now are Poland-40mil.ch. But there are also questions for Poland, some voivodships are called Ruskim and in Lithuania also Black Russia and Chervonnaya Rus are not only Galicia, but territorially, part of Belarus / Lithuania, so the same Russians fought against the Russians, it couldn’t be.
          Therefore, what this war was all about is not clear and TI naturally doesn’t explain anything at all. The only explanation was the civil war.

          Quote: Trilobite Master
          Disagree categorically. There are many examples in history when small armies turned out to be stronger than numerous, and states with a huge population submitted to small but belligerent neighbors. Examples are needed, or do you rummage?


          the fact that TI has any "mass of examples does not raise questions; questions arise regarding the content of the examples themselves.
          Quote: Trilobite Master
          Silver, tin, lead, copper. None of this was produced in Russia at that time. Silver is needed for the mint, copper and tin for casting bronze guns, lead for bullets and many other needs


          This can not be, because in Russia a large number of bells, for example, and that all of their imported copper? You will suffer so much to bring.
          In addition, the very word _med_worldly Russian and the root of the word _metal_ therefore copper has always been in Russia.
          And there was no lead in Russia? Is it in a country that has always fought and which is always from imported lead? You are raving.

          Quote: Trilobite Master
          Trade, only trade. Therefore, the access to the sea was always important, and therefore the princes clung to Novgorod the Great and the Volga Route.


          in order to organize foreign trade, you must first have internal, but how can this be done if in your Russia there was neither silver nor copper for money? Not a single economy works like that. This is not possible.

          Quote: Trilobite Master
          No need to be so self-critical that you are. This time you did not write anything particularly stupid, but, as I understand it, the day is just beginning.


          as usual, you did not understand, problems with susceptibility and learning, usually signs of poor memory and carelessness, which is characteristic of dvoices.
          TI is a traditional story. Write yourself what to watch when you forget again.
          1. 0
            18 July 2018 16: 57
            Quote: Bar1
            are you there, how will you confirm your linguistic habits, or everything that your irrepressible talker has said before?

            REPEAT, remember.
            Zaliznyak talked about the impossibility of the arbitrary replacement of letters in words. Read the most Zaliznyak, he described everything is very clear. For an intelligent person, naturally. smile
            The basic principle of changes in the language was discovered only in the XIX century, and this is the greatest achievement of historical linguistics. Its significance for this science is no less than, say, the significance of the discovery of the law of world wideness for physics.
            The principle is that the external form of words of a language changes not in an individual way for each word, but due to processes — so-called phonetic changes (otherwise, phonetic transitions), covering in a given language in a given epoch ALL, without exception, words where there is a certain phoneme (or a combination of phonemes).
            This is the fundamental principle of historical linguistics.
            Even the most outlandish transformation of the appearance of a word in the course of history is the result not of an accidental individual substitution of sounds, but the phonetic changes that have been consistently implemented throughout the language of the language that occurred in a given language at a certain period in the past.

            As a result, tasks like “What did the Latin word A turn into in modern French?” And type “What did the Latin word from which the French word B came from?” Are solved in modern historical linguistics with the same precision as, for example, equations in algebra .

            Unlike a professional who considers himself obliged to give a precise explanation of each phoneme in its composition when analyzing the origin of a word, an amateur linguist never shows such exactingness to himself.
            For example, he considers it entirely acceptable that, instead of the expected b, the word he understands appears in, or n, or;; instead of t - d, or q, or s, or s, or w, or w. When comparing words, he considers it possible to discard any letters, that is, to disregard, some others, on the contrary, to conject; he easily allows the rearrangement of letters, etc.

            Addressing the last quotation when talking about linguistic professionals, Zaliznyak uses the term "phoneme." Speaking of the lover - the "letter". It is precisely because professionals explore the sounds of the language, and dilettantes like Fomenko like written words, that is, letters.
            The next myth of amateur linguistics is the priority of the letter over the sounding speech. For the amateur, writing is primary, and the sound is secondary: “this is how the word was read.” Many words, according to amateurs, arose from the fact that someone incorrectly read some other word.

            All quotes from Zaliznyak's article “On professional and amateur linguistics” of 2009, to which I referred you, but either you did not read it, or you didn’t have enough sense to understand what looks more real.
            Next.
            Poland and ON together with Sweden, Livonia and Denmark even surpassed Russia in the total occupied territory of Ivan the Terrible. Why they, given that the population density in the movement to the west has steadily increased, must be given in FIVE times by population is a mystery. Once again - the data in the studio.
            On the ON, indeed 90% of the population were Russian and Orthodox. But why should this have prevented them from fighting with Moscow?
            Quote: Bar1
            This can not be, because in Russia a large number of bells, for example, and that all of their imported copper? You will suffer so much to bring.

            If it cannot be, then tell me where this copper comes from, and all the other metals (silver, tin, lead) were taken. Where are the deposits, mines, and everything that accompanies the production of metals? Romanovs ate? The global flood carried away?
            Quote: Bar1
            No economy works that way. It is not possible.

            Wow, do we also have an economist here besides a historian and linguist? An economist who has not heard anything about barter, as well as about Old Russian Coons. Nothing happens. Since there are historians who have not heard anything, for example, about source study, why not be such an economist?
            Explain to you what I explain, it is useless, this is understandable. Novohronolostvo brain - the diagnosis is curable only with medication. But the stupidity and ignorance that you persistently and successfully demonstrate in our dialogues, on the one hand, amuses me, and on the other, clearly illustrates the inferiority of your positions in front of people who are not suffering from the new times. It is impossible to convince you of something for an objective reason - lack of ability to think as such, multiplied by a firm conviction that you are right, but to have fun with your help, and at the same time improve your communication skills with ... let's say, a few peculiar people ( so as not to use adjectives such as "limited"), can and should be. For example, it is good for me. I began to better understand the logic of poorly developed intellectually and culturally personalities. For this you my sincere thanks. laughing hi
        2. +2
          18 July 2018 15: 13
          I have two wishes for the author: 1 "style": "despite a certain tension between the two great powers" somehow such a literary stamp is not very suitable for the historical essay. 2) "St. George's Day" would be nice to briefly cover this issue.
          Perhaps one of the pockets will clarify this issue. Vedas not from the finger of the Wiskovites sucked this debt
          1. 0
            18 July 2018 15: 49
            Dear Bar, regarding: "the same Russians fought against the Russians, this could not be" here I do not agree with you: remember the period of feudal fragmentation, how many times Tver fought with Moscow, and Kiev with New Year's or Chernigov. Or the Galician principality? In this case, I do not agree with you
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    18 July 2018 06: 24
    But all were in Russia - and negotiators. And those who did not like to be "looser and eye-guard" were engaged in military affairs.
  3. 0
    18 July 2018 06: 55
    Given the general results of the Livonian war for Moscow, it’s incorrect to talk about victories.
  4. +2
    18 July 2018 08: 03
    It is correct that we recall the victories in the Livonian War, after all, and this same. Especially at the first stage. Although the war was unsuccessful, the army tried ...
  5. +3
    18 July 2018 09: 16
    A very important article. Thank you - it’s intelligently written.
  6. 0
    18 July 2018 10: 50
    In 1648, the German Emperor Charles V
    Olepatka? At this time, Karl had long been in the grave.
    1. 0
      18 July 2018 11: 12
      1548 ... Although the event itself, despite the "exact" date, is of a very dubious nature. Well, it naturally appeared at the time of writing the "new Russian history."
    2. 0
      18 July 2018 13: 14
      Quote: sivuch
      Olepatka? At this time, Karl had long been in the grave.

      like Ivan the Terrible. Of course, a typo - in 1548
  7. +2
    18 July 2018 11: 57
    Vitaly Penskaya "Essays on the history of the Livonian War. From Narva to Fellin. 1558 – 1561." © Penskoy V.V., 2017 © "Tsentrpoligraf", 2017
    Peredra literally paragraphs.
    Or Samsonov is Penskaya? laughing
    1. +1
      18 July 2018 12: 37
      I used to be fond of finding sources where the Samsonov conglomerate was tearing apart its opuses. Then tired. Obviously, such authors are happy with the site.
  8. +1
    18 July 2018 13: 15
    okolnichy A. Adashev and clerk of the Ambassadorial order I. Viskovaty not only demanded payment of tribute, but also all the "arrears" accumulated over the past decades. The amount was huge. When the Livonian ambassadors heard about this, they, according to the Livonian chronicler F. Nienstedt, “nearly closed their eyes from their foreheads and they absolutely did not know what to do here; "they didn’t have any punishment to agree and agree on tribute and did not dare to ask for a fee either.”
    “The ambassador from the Golden Horde is coming to you, prince, to receive tribute in twelve years.”
    - So what? .. What ?! FOR TWELVE ?!
  9. +2
    18 July 2018 15: 52
    Quote: Trilobite Master
    Vitaly Penskaya "Essays on the history of the Livonian War. From Narva to Fellin. 1558 – 1561." © Penskoy V.V., 2017 © "Tsentrpoligraf", 2017
    Peredra literally paragraphs.
    Or Samsonov is Penskaya? laughing

    And this is the pseudonym of Samsonov
  10. +1
    18 July 2018 15: 54
    Quote: Curious
    I used to be fond of finding sources where the Samsonov conglomerate was tearing apart its opuses. Then tired. Obviously, such authors are happy with the site.

    And the best, where to dial? The best are in demand in other places, and we are satisfied with what we have
    1. 0
      18 July 2018 16: 13
      And these "other places" of those who are better as "claimed"? Did you catch nets?
  11. +1
    13 August 2018 17: 49
    In fact, one can be proud of victories. A war with almost all of Europe in the presence of a southern threat. Due to geopolitical conditions, Russia was in the zone of risky agriculture. Nothing but rye was growing, huge spaces, almost no minerals, no access to world trade routes. Sparsely populated, has just begun, the so-called "take off to the hills." There are still no waves of Slavic migrations of the 17-18 centuries from Ukraine. There is annexation of Siberia, the Finno-Ugric Volga and Perm. Most of the rural population speaks Mordovian. And under these conditions, Ivan Vasilievich creates an advanced army, logistics, military orders, and boyar separatism wins. The time of the creation of the Russian state. Continuation of the affairs of Vasily III and Ivan III

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"