Machine gun DS-39 (Degtyarev Machine easel 39)

14
The need for a maneuverable and light machine-gun machine gun was realized already in the First World and Civil Wars. Since there was no own machine-gun light machine gun system, they wanted to adopt the German Dreyze system, using military-technical ties with Weimar Germany. However, the appearance of a successful light machine gun system Degtyarev forced to reorient him. The headquarters of the Red Army issued a task to design a lightweight machine gun 13 July 1928 of the year. The idea of ​​unification of machine-gun armament by this time was established, and in the family of Degtyarev machine guns, large-caliber and easel (DS) machine guns were added to the infantry, aviation and tank.

Machine gun DS-39 (Degtyarev Machine easel 39)


The first machine gun based on the “Degtyarev Infantry” on the universal Kolesnikov machine was introduced by the designer already at the beginning of 30. Subsequently, the machine gun was repeatedly refined, as requirements changed and its shortcomings were revealed. For example, in 1933, the machine gun was adapted for using the cloth tape from Maxim, and later for loose-leaf tape of the type Maxim-Vikkers.

In addition to V.A. Degatreva in the development of the machine gun involved S.M. Krekin, P.E. Ivanov, A.I. Kuznetsov (master), and N.D. Zernyshkin (mechanic).

The machine gun of Degatreva after numerous modifications became less unified with the manual one, but retained a number of common features. Machine gun automatics worked due to removal of powder gases into the gas chamber. The camera was located in the middle part (bottom) of the trunk. The gas piston had a long stroke. The gas chamber had a pipe. The gas chamber regulator limited the amount of exhaust gases. The shot was made from the rear whisper. Two symmetrical lugs locked the barrel bore - moving forward the bolt of the bolt carrier pulled apart the lugs, and when moving backward the lugs came down with bevels of the frame. The original feature of the machine gun was a double rate of fire - on ground targets it reached 600 rounds per minute, on aerial targets 1200 rounds per minute. To increase the pace served spring buffer mounted in the back plate. The buffer was turned on at high elevation angles.

Replaceable barrel machine gun was equipped with a conical flame arrester and transverse fins. Foldable handle on the barrel served to carry the machine gun and facilitate the change of the barrel.



The machine gun was equipped with a folding frame sight with scales for heavy and light bullets. The controls were the lever and the two handles of the back plate, made according to the type of Maxim machine gun. Since these controls were installed reciprocating spring (which on prototypes was placed in the tube butt plate) was transferred to the receiver tube located on the bottom left side. On the right side was a charging handle.

The biggest problems were created by the food mechanism. The feed of the tape was made by a slide-type mechanism during the moving system back. The cartridge from the tape was removed with a spring-loaded shutter extractor, the descendant lowered the cartridge into the rigid shutter tabs with the hem. With those paws, the cartridge case was removed from the chamber, which was reflected downwards with the next cartridge. The complex trajectory at high rate of fire required high accelerations, which caused frequent deformation or disassembly of the cartridge. Therefore, only cartridges with a bimetallic or steel sleeve were used, the use of cartridges with a brass sleeve was prohibited in DC-39.

On September 22, 1939, the “7,62 mm machine gun machine of the 1939 Degtyarev system model” was adopted and received the designation DS-39. The food was supposed to be made from metal or cloth tape (in 1939, a carpet machine was created by the Rakov designer Rakov). The use of universal machines Kolesnikova and "Maxim" refused. Instead, a Degtyarev tripod folding machine was adopted instead, which allowed firing only at ground targets. The machine was equipped with angle-adjustable tubular legs with folding additional and rigid main coulters, a vertical coarse-arc mechanism and a fine-coiled screw mechanism, an arm for an optical sight. Shooting was carried out from positions from the knee or lying down. An armored shield with a window for using an optical sight could be installed on the machine. For anti-aircraft fire there was a special machine. For the transportation of a machine gun on a saddle pack adopted a set of packs VSD-39. Tank option did not advance beyond the prototype.



The haste of adopting a machine gun, as well as other types of weapons and military equipment, can be understood - the Soviet Union could soon enter World War II. Japan, the main adversary in the east, and Germany, the main potential adversary in the west, even despite the signed treaties, paid serious attention to equipping their armed forces with automatic weapons. In addition, after the occupation of Czechoslovakia, Germany increased the saturation of the troops with machine guns and gained a developed weapon industry.

The SVT rifle and the Degtyarev machine gun were an important part of the rearmament program of the Soviet army. The production of DS and machine tools for them in Kovrov at plant No. XXUMX was mastered already in 2, at the Tula Arms Plant mass production was mastered in June of 1939. Production of DS required great accuracy. However, already from 1940 such machine guns produced in 10677 a year amounted to 1940 or 6628%.



Reliability machine gun was insufficient. It was not possible to overcome the gap in the receiver of the cartridge, the fallout of a heavy bullet from the sleeve, the sleeve breaks (due to the high speed of movement with a large length of the locking assembly and the absence of a preliminary shearing of the sleeve). The proposals of the designer Simonin (the new stopper of the lid, the radiator of the barrel and the flag closure), implemented in 1941 in the pilot machine gun, did not correct the main drawbacks.

Production of the DS was stopped in June 1941 of the year, a month after Hitler's Germany attacked the USSR, the production of Maxim machine guns was resumed. For the entire 1941 year, the 9691 machine gun "Maxim" and 3717 machine guns of the DS (about 28%) were released. In total, 10345 DS-39 was released, most of which were lost in the first months of the Second World War (some of which were found among the partisans).

“The unfortunate machine-gun drama” (as it is sometimes called by analogy with the “unhappy gun drama” of 1860's) caused not so much constructive as technological lack of knowledge of the new system. But there was no time for fine-tuning (although the possibility of successful refinement was proved by developing an experimental DS-43 machine gun based on the DS-39). The complex system did not give opportunities to quickly expand production. The need for urgent formation of units from reservists, who were not familiar with the new systems, made it quite logical to return to the machine gun that had long been mastered by the troops and industry.

Pinsk partisans on the march. Partizan in the foreground transfers the 7,62-mm heavy machine gun DS-39 (Degtyaryov machine-tool sample 1939 of the year), the calculation of such a machine gun consisted of four people. Pinsk partisans acted at the junction of the Minsk, Polesia, Baranovichi, Brest, Rivne and Volyn regions of the Byelorussian SSR


Specifications machine gun DS-39:
Cartridge - 7,62-mm sample 1908 of the year (7,62x54R);
The mass of the "body" machine gun - 14,3 kg;
Machine gun weight - 42,4 kg (on a machine with a shield);
The length of the "body" of the machine gun - 1170 mm;
The total length of the machine gun - 1440 mm (on the machine);
Barrel length - 723 mm;
Grooves - 4 right;
The length of the stroke rifling - 240 mm;
The initial speed of the light bullet - 860 m / s;
Sighting range when using a light bullet - 2400 m;
Sighting range when using heavy bullets - 3000 m;
The rate of fire - 600 / 1200 shots per minute;
Combat rate - up to 310 shots per minute;
Food - canvas tape on 250 cartridges or metal on 50 cartridges;
The weight of the cartridge case - 9,4 kg (with a ribbon on 250 cartridges);
Type of machine - infantry tripod system Degtyarev;
Shield weight - 7,7 kg;
Machine weight - 11 kg.



According to the article Seeds Fedoseev "Machine guns of World War II"
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    14 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. Dust
      +3
      17 May 2012 09: 20
      Yes, this system cannot be called successful in any way!
      DP and DShK would be enough for Degtyarev’s name to remain forever among the great gunsmiths ...
      1. +2
        17 May 2012 12: 37
        and why does his flame arrester confuse me
    2. schta
      +3
      17 May 2012 10: 56
      DP lightweight, without interchangeable barrel, with a low practical rate of fire. DShK 12mm heavy, do not run across the fields. Maxim is good, but heavy and old.

      So they tried to fill the niche of easel machine guns throughout the war. Goryunov and Degtyarev cars (SG43 and DS-39) are Maxim’s sane competitors.
    3. Kibb
      +1
      17 May 2012 12: 17
      "only cartridges with a bimetallic or steel sleeve, in the DS-39 it was forbidden to use cartridges with a brass sleeve" - ​​a terrible dream of the supplier.
      Interestingly, the use of a cartridge for ShKAS could not solve the problem (hangers))?
      1. loc.bejenari
        -2
        17 May 2012 14: 10
        on the contrary, bimetal was full and brass sleeves were in short supply
        1. Kibb
          +2
          17 May 2012 14: 25
          Yes, where does the material of manufacture?
          "For the ShKAS machine gun, under the leadership of N. M. Elizarov, cartridges were worked out ... In these cartridges, to prevent unloading (dismantling) (and, I will add a rupture of the cartridge case when removing) the cartridge at a huge rate of fire of 30-50 shots per second, thickened walls shells, the fastening of the capsule in the socket was strengthened, a double annular bullet crimp was introduced in the muzzle of the cartridge case. At the bottom of the cartridge case for ShKAS machine guns, in addition to the standard designations, the letter "Ш" was put. "
          ShKAS cartridges were mainly in a brass sleeve and backward compatible with an infantry cartridge
          1. +1
            17 May 2012 21: 22
            the difficulty of supply - or to supply several thousand aircraft, or tens of thousands of machine gunners at the front.
            1. Kibb
              0
              17 May 2012 22: 00
              So clear pepper - Intersen is precisely the technical moment
          2. Sergio
            0
            17 May 2012 21: 36
            > at a huge rate of fire of 30-50 rounds per second

            where are these fantastic numbers from?
          3. +1
            18 May 2012 08: 00
            The cartridges for the ShKAS machine guns were specially designed, since conventional rifle cartridges gave frequent breaks of the cartridge case or displacement. These cartridges were produced with a brass or bimetallic sleeve. These cartridges were just what was desired for the DS-39. With them, this machine gun did not have any problems.
            The restriction on the use, most likely, concerns the cartridges of the 1908 model, which were still numerous in the troops.
    4. 0
      18 May 2012 01: 26
      Damn handsome. If you brought it to mind, you could have become the basis of a single machine gun, like the German MG, there simply was not enough time ...

      The most catchy flaw, although beautiful in appearance, is the frequent transverse cooling fins. It’s difficult to do, it’s difficult to clean, they will clog up with dirt in battle, the cooling effect will decrease.
    5. +1
      18 May 2012 07: 38
      DS-39 required highly qualified specialists in the manufacture and the corresponding machine equipment. The army also needed well-trained fighters - machine gunners serving this machine gun. The same story happened as with Tokarev's self-loading rifle.
      At the same time, the Maxim machine gun was simpler in production, and less trained soldiers could master it in the army. During the war, this was a decisive factor. There was no time for fine-tuning and training.
      1. 0
        18 May 2012 12: 26
        As for the cost and complexity in pr-ve - look at the history of the T-34, how it became cheaper and simplified over the years of pr-v, it became more reliable.

        Maxim is not much simpler, no matter how difficult, just for him there were ALREADY established technologies, equipment and specialists. Plus his "sluggish" rate of fire - 450-500 vm, but even he warped this damn canvas tape, an anachronism from the 19th century.
        Once about “Max” he said - the old man was not so bad, especially in defense, but by the 43rd, the year of the offensive, they had already made the SG.
        1. 0
          21 December 2018 19: 21
          Maxim was graduated. In the thousands. Setting up and tuning the DS took time and inevitably caused a break in production. There was no time at that. Even the modernization of the PD in the presence of obvious shortcomings was carried out only at the end of the war, so as not to slow down the pace of production. In addition, at that time industry did not produce metal tape in the required quantity, and only Maxim with its crank shock-free automatics could chew the canvas. Maxim wasn’t easier to maintain, fussing with him was akin to setting up a sewing machine, winding a sealing thread, adjusting the return spring and other perversions, but they don’t change horses at the crossing .. and machine guns even more so ..
    6. 0
      26 August 2022 19: 42
      the Finns still shoot from them and keep proving that this is a very good machine gun.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"