What happened to the test SSJ-100 in the suburbs?

Some time ago, in the suburban Ramenskoye, an SSJ-100 made an emergency landing. According to the latest data, Sukhoi-SuperJet has not completely left the right landing gear. When landing in an emergency mode, the liner received certain damage, which, as experts note, is removable.

Landing was carried out at LII im.Gromova. Told about it RIA News Director General of the Research Institute Yevgeny Pushkarsky.

According to Pushkarsky, there were no injuries aboard the aircraft and "on the ground". The airfield continues its work in normal mode.
It is noted that the aircraft will be restored in the near future. Further, all planned tests will be continued.

At the moment, a special group of experts is being formed, which should clarify the cause of the SSJ-100 incident in Ramenskoye.

At the time of testing in the plane were three people: the pilot, flight test engineer and a representative of the certification center. Test maneuvers were conducted to clarify the aerodynamic parameters of the liner with the so-called wing tips. The test test pilot who piloted the aircraft exceeded 11,4 in thousands of hours, of which the SSJ-100 raid was about 3 in thousands of hours.
The airliner itself at this point carried out almost 300 various kinds of test flights.

Comments

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident . Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome .

[Kuroneko]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident. Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome.

May I?
The Kremlin’s hand, definitely. At the same time, my sofa expertise, distinguished by its rare brevity, covers all the points required for it. Plus consonant with Western political fashion.

[Greg Miller]

- Who is the witness?
“I am a witness!” What happened?

[Kuroneko]

This is more likely to Observer 2014, huh. He is here, next to him. Any witness is an observer. Although the opposite is not always true. It is like congruence and equalness.

[Vanek]

Quote: Kuroneko

The hand of the Kremlin, definitely

The Kremlin's hand held the landing gear in the space allotted for the last place and did not allow it (the strut) to take the necessary position.

[Kuroneko]

You correctly caught the thought. ^ _ ^

[Observer2014]

Aristarkh Lyudvigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident. Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome.

Congratulations! You were the first

[free]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident.

And don’t talk. Now iksperdy will run - "Putin absolutely", and the pension reform will be inserted here, how to give.

Odnobryamsy already here.

[MPN]

Well, let's do it. LII testers. They should, as it were, carry out, according to the plan, variants of possible non-standard situations. And the very good news that they identified this problem is for this purpose created. But the minus to the author. No specifics, just scream, why discuss something?

[helmi8]

Quote: MPN

No specifics, just scream, why discuss something?

Fortune telling on coffee grounds ...

[Random]

Quote: MPN

They should, as it were, carry out, according to the plan, variants of possible non-standard situations.

1. Conduct test flights, according to the plan of the leading engineer "on the subject" in modes close to critical and beyond

Quote: MPN

And the very good news that they identified this problem, for this and created

What problem did they identify? Revealed the reason why the right leg did not go out or didn’t lock? so this is by no means connected with the modes of taking aerodynamic characteristics.

Quote: MPN

But the minus to the author. No specifics, just scream, why discuss something?

And for that, minus that .... there is an emergency on board ..... the pilots got out of it perfectly. the whole crew is alive. They will remove the JUICE and everything will become clear

[MPN]

Quote: Random

And for that, minus that .... there is an emergency on board ..... the pilots got out of it perfectly. the whole crew is alive. They will remove the JUICE and everything will become clear

Do not judge strictly, because the essence of the problem was not clarified by the author and there was nothing to discuss, and the pilots did well no doubt, I myself did not see the pilot just a topic for discussion, but got excited about the author, and here's a frank comment that turned out to be superficial.

[Random]

Quote: MPN

Yes, got excited about the author, that’s a frankly speaking superficial comment turned out.

Quite normal koment , and the authors must be kept in check, since they go to the "regime sites" only in full-time, that is. TWO pilots, not one, like the author.
During his life only two times "saw" the pilot and "combined" in the subject of "engineer on the subject" and then naturally not leading
But ... just not in the topics of strength, stability and controllability

[GABALIS]

These are all Jews!

[Observer2014]

GABALIS (Dmitriy)

These are all Jews!

Well, at least not in Moldova

[AUL]

But inside Ukraine, mortars explode!

[PalBor]

Quote: GABALIS

These are all Jews!

And cyclists ...

[Greg Miller]

The reason for this accident, as well as for all the others, was Issak’s law of universal gravitation, you know, Newton !!!!

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: Greg Miller

The reason for this accident, as well as for all the others, was Issak’s law of universal gravitation, you know, Newton !!!!

Zhukovsky is also a suspicious person. May also be involved.

[Waddimm]

Isaac? Like Jews !!!

[MPN]

Quote: Greg Miller

The reason for this accident, as well as for all the others, was Issak’s law of universal gravitation, you know, Newton !!!!

The pilot himself ... but it's hard to argue ... Not even the pilots, we all find ourselves there (in the ground) ...

[Svarog]

Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident . Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome .

No need to be an expert, just be careful and look around .. BREAKTHROUGH only through federal channels, and the reality is different ..

[Muvka]

Those. In your opinion, are the Boeings and Airbases problemless? They do not break anything and they do not fall? Any technique may fail. Even the German BMW. And to tie it to breakthroughs is to show a brain deficiency.

[notingem]

Boeings and airbuses are in demand. BMW too. And even in Russia they don’t want to buy a Superjet. Here is a sofa

[Muvka]

Then how do you explain the fact that they were produced about one and a half hundred in a few years and about a third go abroad?

[notingem]

Ur boeing shamed

[Mountain shooter]

Where are you looking? I am observing so - the roads were repaired. Food, food, not a single hole ... Food and I think - where did they deceive me?

[MPN]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Where are you looking? I am observing so - the roads were repaired. Food, food, not a single hole ... Food and I think - where did they deceive me?

Yeah. and where are they deceived? They do not deceive us, but force us to deceive ourselves, which is the essence! do not be deceived and you will not be deceived ...

[tracer]

It’s like a consonant with the classics “and today not everyone can watch tomorrow ...”

[Vanek]

Quote: MPN

don't be fooled

In Novosibirsk. From Energetikov Square to Dimitrov Ave. (road section, dam and bridge over the Ob) they removed the old and laid new asphalt. About four km. At least go sideways!

I drive and cheat.

In the area of ​​the 30th kilometer of the Leninsk-Kuznetsk highway a new layer of asphalt, do not believe it, 40 centimeters are laid.

I'm going to the country and I'm being deceived.

Nemirovich-Danchenko from SovSibiri to Stanislavsky about four km. also new. Also sideways.

I'm cheating.

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: Svarog

Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident . Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome .

No need to be an expert, just be careful and look around .. BREAKTHROUGH only through federal channels, and the reality is different ..

Let me disagree. Recently there was a BREAK in the basement of our house.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Svarog

BREAKTHROUGH only through federal channels, and the reality is different ..

Yeah, before it didn’t beat, it didn’t break, but now, as I have already noticed, “Putin has completely overcome it.” During my service in the USSR Armed Forces, only in our regiment there were 4 serial disasters of fully-developed Tu-95. You, among the first iksperds are noted here.

[Starover_Z]

Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident . Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome .

What happened to the test SSJ-100 in the suburbs?

That's why he and the test board, in order to work out emergency situations on it, in order to avoid repetitions on serial boards, with passengers or on the military with weapons of mass destruction. There was nothing to lay out a regular situation for a test site, like a "roasted duck"!

[Random]

Quote: Starover_Z

That's why he and the test board, in order to work out emergency situations on it.

Yes, but it’s neither the way out nor the release of the front and main landing gear, nor the cleaning of additional wings or brake flaps ... it’s not so uncommon on serial sides either. 20-30 years in the series
Hydraulic systems they are .... "moody" (girlfriends)

[TAMBU]

This is all the fat Bolsheviks and reptilians from the State Department ... here and so everything is clear)

[vkl.47]

If only they didn’t begin to shake the RPKB again, but then they were frequent about it and without. I hope everything is fine with the devices

[mgero]

Eto Pilot mstit pravitelstvu za pensionuyu reformu, Letchik toje potentcialni pensioner.

[Fitter65]

Below komenty did not read

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

Dilettantism, apophenia, conspiracy theories are welcome.

with this you expressed everything, of course, there may be one or two in the case, but the bulk will be, like we are releasing a worthless plane, here Pogosyan ruined the most beautiful Tu-334 with his SSJ, but instead of this under-plane it was possible to produce the beautiful An-148. Yes, and this was at one time. I even still have somewhere articles praising An, and dropping Superjet below the paving slabs. There is nothing to harness the cart in front of the horse, and guessing on the coffee grounds (at best) will conduct an investigation, analyze it, and bring it to the part concerning.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Fitter65

Yes, instead of this under-plane it was possible to produce the beautiful An-148. Yes, and even that was once

Oh yes ... I saw a discussion about the advantages of the An-148 over the SSJ already in 2015, when everything seemed to be clear with the An-148.

[Fitter65]

Yes, even before the Maidan was when they were going to collect it at the Voronezh plant.

[Alexey RA]

No, well, before the Maidan options were. But not in 2015!
Moreover, in 2015, with the prospects for the commercial operation of the An-148, everything was already crystal clear.

[Random]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

Urgently needed sofa examination of this accident

But not the "sofa" will go?

After the completion of the planned test flight program, when building the scheme for the landing approach, when the landing gear was triggered, the alarm about the non-release of the right main landing gear was triggered. When passing over the launch, it was found that the right landing gear was not fully released and therefore did not lock.
After running out of fuel, the landing was made on a specially prepared runway. The plane received minor damage, there were no casualties, no injuries were recorded among crew members


SSJ 100 aircraft, serial number 95032, assembly February 2013. Flown 535 flight hours, completed 294 test flights and made 294 landings

[Fitter65]

Quote: Random

But not the "sofa" will go?

When a person who understands and understands this comments and writes, I think that it’s even welcome.

[Egorovich]

And the old woman is a slammer. The main thing is everyone is alive.

[bouncyhunter]

At the moment, a special group of experts is being formed, which should clarify the cause of the SSJ-100 incident in Ramenskoye.

That’s all said, so there’s no time to wave a saber from right to left. It is better to wait for the results of the investigation of the causes (if they consider it necessary to report them).

[san4es]

According to the latest data, Sukhoi-SuperJet did not completely get the right landing gear.

[Egorovich]

Yes, how many such cases, not a countable amount. And it was and will be. Most importantly, no casualties.

[san4es]

Quote: Egorovich

Yes, how many such cases

... 2013 Sukhoi Superjet-100 in Iceland made a hard landing. The chassis didn’t work either

[Kuroneko]

For some reason, I remembered the square portholes of the "Comet" ... Also the middle-haul.
Who does not know - google. This seems to be a trifle, but how many lives claimed.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Kuroneko

For some reason, I remembered the square portholes of the "Comet" ... Also the middle-haul.

Yeah ... periodic loads - stress concentration in the corners of the cutouts under the windows - cracks - the destruction of the fuselage. Two disasters in one year.

[Kuroneko]

In, remember. But the problem for a very long time could not even be determined. No one on the windows and thought.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Kuroneko

You remember

Duc ... sunk into the head since the Soviet era, from school - then my parents bought a book of memoirs about Tupolev. So there, in one of the chapters (EMNIP, about Tu-104) it was told how some seemingly trifles could radically change the fate of the aircraft. And as an example, problems with the "comet" were cited, and it was told about the insight of the ANT in terms of the election of the form of portholes.

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Superjet is an extremely strong device. Landing on the belly, followed by field repairs in Iceland and arriving home on its own, speaks volumes about this.

[Kuroneko]

April 28, 1988, USA, Hawaii - an old Aloha Airlines Boeing 737 was prepared for a regular flight from Hilo Airport to Honolulu Airport. This is a short 35 minute flight. At this site, the planes flew like buses. 8-10 flights per day. For flight 243, it was the ninth flight this morning. Take-off took place normally, but at an altitude of 7000 meters, half of the upper part of the fuselage was torn off the plane. The stewardess sucked into the hole, several passengers turned gray, the rest sat as if alive. The pilots managed to safely land the resulting air convertible. About this case in Hollywood, they even shot a drama called "Miracle Landing". Subsequently, it became clear that the skin of the aircraft corrupted for two decades with a hook and a dozen years of operation in a tropical marine climate (this machine flew to Hawaii in Taiwan from Cathay Pacific), and even the reinforcing repair kit already received by the airline had failed for more than two years in the warehouse: from Aloha Airlines didn’t get around to take off one of the main profit collection tools from flights.

[Vanek]

Quote: Kuroneko

The stewardess sucked into the hole

Sucked in?

Maybe pulled? At worst, it sucked out.

As my drawing teacher said:

- This is not a hole! This is a TECHNOLOGICAL hole!

[Kuroneko]

I wrote it right. Accordingsucks в hole (somewhere). Yousucks of aircraft cabin (from somewhere). Well, as a rule, something is either stretched or very elastic, or long (or gaseous). Perhaps both at the same time. It is unlikely that that stewardess had such long legs from her ears =). A semantic emphasis was placed precisely on the hole, and not on the interior. However, if you have a desire to argue, I am only for it. I have been engaged in translations since 2004, and there have always been five in Russian at school.

Quote: Vanek

Highаfat.

Yeah. Have you seen Sasun?

[Vanek]

Quote: Kuroneko

there is a desire to argue

No no.

I agree with you...

About the "hole" is funny. I remembered the school.

Quote: Kuroneko

Yeah. Have you seen Sasun?

... not ready to answer ...

[RL]

That is what international cooperation means!
To that. Look at the history of DC-3, how and where they sat.

[RL]

I do not always agree with you, but in this case, I completely agree with you.

[Vanek]

Quote: Egorovich

And the old woman is proruha.

Only the one who does not do anything is not mistaken.

[Curious]

What is there to guess? The reason is on the surface. The crew, upset by the pension reform, could not fully concentrate on managing the aircraft and made a mistake.

[Kuroneko]

Wrong. See the root. Those. to the landing gear, not to the crew. They just raised the retirement age at the counter (slightly higher than its average lifespan). But the stand until the last moment tried to finalize to a well-deserved pension (and re-melting). Not fartanulo.

[ver_]

.. ran through his eyes - there was some kind of disgusting impression - that it wasn’t ice .. I don’t even want to delve into ...

[Kuroneko]

Similarly. There are specially trained people for that. For understanding (the main thing is not the Dutch to delve into, otherwise the Kremlin’s hand will be found even here).

[123456789]

"Every mistake has a name, surname and patronymic" Lavrenty Beria.

[gukoyan]

That's strange, otherwise I sat and thought what was going on with this plane)))

[Sinbad]

For this, test flights are carried out so that there would be no operational incidents.

[vadivm59]

expert D. "UKRAINE has ceased to supply motors for wheel production, and in general, they used to make planes in bed workshops (A.S. Yakovlev) even from plywood, but in a month." You give a wooden plane!

[AlexanderS]

Sofa expertise offers a solution for such cases!

It is very pleasing that this time everything went smoothly and with minimal damage. But this is not always the case, alas. Often landing with a defective chassis, and even more so on the belly, leads to serious damage to the aircraft, up to its decommissioning, and to human casualties.

But what if we do an aerodrome emergency landing system for civil aviation?

Strictly parallel to the runway lay two - on both sides of it - a section of a conventional railway line (jointless with heavy rails). Slightly longer than the runway, in order to drive the unit into one of the ends in idle mode and it would not bother anyone there. A standard railway platform is placed on each section, the platforms are rigidly interconnected by a metal truss. On the farm (across it, i.e. parallel to the runway) - two flat wide "contact supports", rubberized from above. The position of the "contact supports" is adjustable in height and the distance between them: there are several fixed positions for different types of aircraft, so that the aircraft can lie on them, relying only on the wings and not touching anything on the fuselage, engines and landing gear (if it did come out) , with a margin. Although for the fuselage may be present and the third "contact support".
A powerful aircraft engine is also installed on each platform, fixed so that it can be rotated 180 degrees, that is, it has 2 working positions, both parallel to the runway and rails. Two positions are needed not only for the possibility of braking, but also so that the unit can "catch" the plane in both working directions of the runway. The unit has laser rangefinders / lidars (or radars) and an on-board computer controlling the engines. It’s better not to have a human operator there.
When landing an aircraft with a landing gear failure, the dispatcher activates the unit. If necessary, aerodrome technicians quickly rearrange the "contact supports" in the position for this type of aircraft. The unit’s lidars / radars “capture” the aircraft approaching the landing and continuously determine the distance, altitude and speed. The computer accelerates the unit to the actual landing speed of the aircraft in such a way that when the aircraft is above the runway, the unit would travel all the time strictly under it. Pilots land the plane as usual, synchronously to go under it - this is the task of the unit. Instead of touching the runway, the plane will lie on the “contact supports”. Having determined that the load was lying down at full weight, the computer will give a command to release the latches (so that the aircraft does not “slip” from the unit forward when braking), will rotate its engines 180 degrees and start to brake them, if necessary, using regular pneumatic railway brakes.
The design of the unit will not interfere with the use of regular reverse engine aircraft. Also, the truss structure should be such that if for some reason the wings could not withstand the load and break off, most of the fuselage would lie on the truss without touching the runway, and it would remain intact. But this is an extreme case, the supports should be wide so that the intact wings could withstand.
It seems to me that such a landing may even be “softer” than usual with a working chassis and the aircraft will remain almost intact - it only remembers the elements of the wing and its mechanization.
I’m not sure, but it may make sense to use the system for safe landing of serviceable aircraft in some cases (strong crosswind, icy runways).

I think that when using reinforced 8-axle platforms and powerful enough engines (they still need to be able to accelerate the unit to 250 or more km / h in a few hundred meters), the system will be able to accept quite heavy aircraft, up to the IL-96 / B777 / B787 / A350. With the B747, A380 and An-124, of course, the situation is more complicated, very difficult.

Yes, such a system is not too simple and not very cheap. But it is not prohibitively expensive, given that it can be constructed on the basis of commercially available elements (railway platforms and tracks), and the engines in general are not new. I suspect no more than one or two aircraft. That is, the first (or second :-) the plane saved by her will pay for the construction costs. Not to mention human lives.

Such systems would be enough to have only at major airports. Say, for the whole Moscow air hub one would be enough, because in the event of a chassis failure, the flight Vnukovo / Domodedovo / Sheremetyevo in most cases should pass without problems.

Such is the idea of ​​an amateur - a couch enthusiast of aviation.
It is interesting what professionals will say.

[ver_]

Quote: 123456789

"Every mistake has a name, surname and patronymic" Lavrenty Beria.

..and the old woman happens to be the bastard of Stalin and Khrushchev had to * finish * at the same time .. Then Beria would still live ..