Last in the series? In Zelenodolsk laid MRK project 21631

61
The ceremony of laying a small rocket ship project 21631, called "Stavropol", was held today at the Gorky Shipyard in Zelenodolsk, reported in the department of information and mass communications of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

Last in the series? In Zelenodolsk laid MRK project 21631




The Deputy Minister of Defense Alexey Krivoruchko, representatives of the Main Command of the Navy, as well as representatives of the Government of the Republic of Tatarstan attended the ceremonial ceremony. As it was reported at the Zelenodolsk shipyard, the mortgaged Stavropol MRK will be the twelfth 21631 ship under construction at this plant.

It must be recalled that six ships of this project are already serving in the Naval fleet Of Russia. Of these, the leading Sviyazhsk and serial Uglich, Veliky Ustyug are part of the Caspian flotilla, Zeleny Dol and Serpukhov serve in the Baltic, and Vyshny Volochek has recently joined the Black Sea Fleet.

At present, five more ships are being built at different stages of construction at Zelenodolsk Shipyard, not counting the Stavropol pledged today, this is the Orekhovo-Zuevo, Ingushetia, Grayvoron, Grad and Naro-Fominsk.

The 21631 "Buyan-M" IRAs are multi-purpose river-sea type ships equipped with modern weapons, including eight high-precision Caliber cruise missiles. Displacement - 949 tons with a length of 75 meters and a width of 11 meters. Maximum speed - 25 nodes. Navigation range - 2500 miles, autonomy - 10 day. Crew - 52 person.

The six ISCs currently at the construction and completion stage, unlike the first six copies, will be armed with the Pantsir-M naval version of the ZRPK.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    12 July 2018 14: 31
    Well, finally I see the word last. And then recently all the extreme and the extreme write. good
    1. +4
      12 July 2018 15: 31
      Quote: Troll
      Well, finally I see the last word.

      ===========
      And me personally, the word "last"in this case, not at all happy (for some reason!) ..... request
      Quote: Troll
      And then recently all the extreme and the extreme write.

      ===============
      Well, it just so happened .... In the Army, the word "last" has sacral the meaning of "..... type:" this is our LAST "and decisive battle ...... Therefore, they probably prefer to say" extreme "!!!! stop
      1. +1
        12 July 2018 22: 51
        And I personally do not like the word "last" in this case (for some reason!) ..... request

        but I would say the opposite - the last - and thank God. The ship is not cheap, the tasks that it solves are very specific and limited, and you will see soon that ships will not be needed to solve them.
    2. +2
      12 July 2018 19: 59
      According to the logic of the development of Russian shipbuilding in recent years, then the shipyards are moving to the construction of boats, as in Ukraine?
      1. +2
        13 July 2018 00: 05
        Quote: Greg Miller
        shipyards move to the construction of boats, as in Ukraine?

        Oh, trouble-trouble ... wassat Yes, it is urgent to lay the first rank in Tatarstan.
        Quote: Greg Miller
        the logic of the development of Russian shipbuilding
        Well, the logic says that not everything that swims is, say, a swimmer. Yes
        1. +1
          13 July 2018 10: 49
          Paranoid50, no. The main reason is the lack of at least modernized in Russia, not to mention modern shipbuilding and ship repair plants. Ships and ships are built for a long and expensive time, and for the sovereign of the 90s farmers who rule now in Russia, the army and the military-industrial complex are just financial flows for which you could buy yachts and palaces on the Cote d'Azur ... Unfortunately, modern Russia, it is the same rapidly degrading Ukraine of the early 2000s. Only with oil, gas and nuclear weapons, allowing you to slightly slow down this degradation. China objectively calls Russia a "slowly sinking ship" ... Slowly, but still sinking ....
          1. +1
            13 July 2018 20: 43
            Well then, I wonder why a prosperous Belarus is asking for a loan from a backward RF. and not vice versa. Well, if everything is so clever for you, but everything is bad for us? belay And by the way, the tax on parasites then abolished you, the rich? wink tongue
            1. +1
              13 July 2018 23: 57
              Vitaliy .... Russia sponsors not only Belarus, but also Ukraine, the United States and many other countries. Belarus is a small and very poor country, but the standard of living here is no lower than in Russia. There are no oligarchs and ethnic gangs, there are no colonel billionaires and shift officials (living in the West and working in Belarus on a rotational basis). Here, plants and factories are not plundered by privatization. Here, the US ambassador, like a slop cat, was thrown out of the country 10 years ago and the staff of the US embassy - 6 people. And the flag hangs not Vlasov or Bandera, but almost Soviet .... As for the tax on parasites, this issue does not concern me as a citizen of Russia ... But if you are interested, then I will know by Monday ....
            2. 0
              16 July 2018 10: 00
              Vitaly, I clarified for you about the tax on parasites ... It has not yet been levied, and when it was levied, it was small - something about 10 thousand rubles a year by ours ...
      2. +2
        13 July 2018 15: 22
        Unfortunately you are right, one thing is good that the boats are of slightly larger displacement. And yes, the surface fleet is degrading in our country.
  2. +1
    12 July 2018 14: 34
    Since when did the Shell become portable ??? )))
    1. +2
      12 July 2018 14: 48
      You, sir, where did you get this?
      1. +3
        12 July 2018 14: 51
        The author corrected the error ...))) Before that it was - MANPADS Shell-M
        1. 0
          12 July 2018 15: 37
          Quote: Tahtvjd2868
          The author corrected the error ...))) Before that it was - MANPADS Shell-M

          ======
          Well, tady - "OH" !!! All is correct !!! I apologize for the "sharpness" .....
          No one is insured against the "flames"! ..... request
    2. +1
      12 July 2018 14: 50
      Perhaps "P" from the word "cannon"?
      1. +2
        12 July 2018 14: 54
        Anti-aircraft missile and cannon system (ZRPK)
        (Instead of output)))
        1. +4
          12 July 2018 15: 09
          I repeat to you once again - there was MANPADS in the first version of the article! After my post - it was fixed on ZRPK, which is true
    3. +2
      12 July 2018 14: 50
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      Since when did the Shell become portable ???

      when transferred from shore to ship))))
      hooray, finally these buoys will end, well, I don’t like them, I think patrolmen (corvettes) like Vasily Bykov will start riveting, the weapons are the same, only seaworthiness is better - the range is greater, the habitability is higher - it has the possibility of a spinner
      1. 0
        12 July 2018 15: 02
        The price is more ...
        1. +4
          12 July 2018 15: 06
          Quote: cariperpaint
          The price is more ...

          a rubber boat with a machine gun has a lower price - should they be riveted? belay
          1. +1
            12 July 2018 15: 08
            Rubber boats carry cruise missiles on themselves?)))
            1. +1
              12 July 2018 15: 34
              Quote: cariperpaint
              Rubber boats carry cruise missiles on themselves?)))

              and locomotives?
      2. 0
        12 July 2018 15: 40
        Quote: Sandor Clegane
        hurray, finally these buoys will end, well, I don’t like them,

        =======
        What do you say ????
        And to me - the WRONG !! - REALLY LIKE!! good
        And I "personally" advise you to "calculate" WHAT power equipment at the Buyans and Karakurt "!!!
        Having a speed of 5 (!!!) knots more, "Karakurt" has almost twice (!!!!) a more powerful (and therefore more "gluttonous") GEM !!!!!
        1. +1
          13 July 2018 06: 25
          Quote: venik
          And I personally advise you

          you’ll give advice to your wife, compare the calm and bending - yes, cleverly)) plus on the bull can stand a spinner and a displacement of 400 tons or more and there is PLO which is not on the buoys, so there is a spinner on Bykov, with an increase in tonnage of 400 tons- seaworthiness-speed-habitability-air defense-sub
          O_redsva RES- and in Buyan this is not all !!!
          1. 0
            13 July 2018 11: 52
            Quote: Sandor Clegane
            you will give advice to your wife, compare the calm and bending - yes, cleverly)) p

            At least on Vasily Bykov there is no "Calm" and is not expected (the Ministry of Defense chose this configuration). photo under construction. So there is also "Bending".
      3. 0
        13 July 2018 11: 46
        “Rivet” “Buyans” ceased in favor of “Karakurt”, because Their class is one and the same, but seaworthiness is different. Buyan was originally a river-sea (body contours, water jets). "Karakurt" (plan - 18 pcs) are more suitable for the modern moment, because we won’t have a sufficient number of 1-2 ships for a long time yet, and someone needs to go to the Mediterranean Sea. And there’s a lot more where to plug holes.

        As for the patrol 22160. This is a ship of a slightly different class and purpose (frigate corvettes are blurry, the Soviet classification is closer and clearer to me). As its name implies. for RTOs - the main shock potential. For a patrol ship - range and autonomy (well, a helicopter). Plus 22160 that it will be possible to put different modules on it (although this is all relative). It can carry out shock functions, counter-terrorism. Perhaps PLO (helicopter + towed HOOK). But in the end it will be more expensive than MRK. So one another is not a replacement.
    4. 0
      12 July 2018 15: 34
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      Since when did the Shell become portable ??? )))

      =========
      Do not understand???? And WHERE is it written there that HE (in the sense of "Armor" is PORTABLE ??? fool
      ZRPK is "зracial рaket-пear кcomplex "!!!
      ========
      More thoroughly! More thoroughly necessary (read the article!) .... fool
      1. +4
        12 July 2018 16: 27
        Quote: venik

        More thoroughly! More thoroughly necessary (read the article!) ....

        before show-off bash and be rude - should be clarified! originally in the article bycalled MANPADS !!!! then corrected when the Persian wrote !! negative
        1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +4
    12 July 2018 14: 37
    ... when they write "this is the last, in the built series of destroyers / cruisers / apl", I will drink a liter of whiskey, alone / with friends, on my brother
    1. +1
      12 July 2018 14: 46
      Yeah, the last Star Cruiser in the series.
    2. +2
      12 July 2018 14: 51
      You risk dying of thirst! wink drinks
      1. +2
        12 July 2018 14: 56
        Yes ... Sleeping, in the near future, does not threaten ..)
    3. 0
      12 July 2018 15: 51
      Quote: The Siberian Barber
      ... when they write "this is the last, in the built series of destroyers / cruisers / apl", I will drink a liter of whiskey, alone / with friends, on my brother

      ==========
      If they write what it is LAST "in the built series destroyers / cruisers / apl"I’ll drink a liter of whiskey, alone / with friends, on my brother ....."
      I personally won’t drink with you ..... And I’ll look for my time sheet PM !!! am
      Or did I misunderstand you ???
      1. +1
        13 July 2018 05: 54
        Or did I misunderstand you ???

        Of course not right! The man actually hinted that in our country today only small vessels rivet in more or less series. And the medium-heavy class really doesn’t even bother.
        Correspondingly, if "the last cruiser in the series is built", it will at least indicate that these same cruisers, praise to the pasta monster, began to be built for some time and they are already in the fleet.
  4. 0
    12 July 2018 14: 54
    If we look at the history of the fleet, then Peter also began with galleys ..)) Why is this boat not a galley of the 1st century? ) Presence is quite enough to indicate ...
    1. +3
      12 July 2018 14: 59
      The presence of WHERE?))
      "Galley" - also read in two ways ...)
      The guarantor, too, "like a slave, in the galleys" ...
    2. +1
      12 July 2018 15: 00
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      Presence is quite enough to indicate ..

      So, it seems, they showed themselves quite well, striking at barmales.
      1. +1
        12 July 2018 15: 02
        Why, for barmaley to build a fleet?)
        Tasks, yet others .. Along the way, yes ...
        1. +3
          12 July 2018 15: 05
          Then, in order to shoot this evil from a distance, without putting our soldiers and officers at risk!
          1. +3
            12 July 2018 15: 08
            Well, then, RPKSN is the most, according to your logic)
            Oops is a district, in the amount of some Syria / Libya, the end ..
            No caches will help)
            1. +2
              12 July 2018 15: 14
              laughing Well, or the death star!
        2. +5
          12 July 2018 15: 15
          You are wrong .. Here we are on the Amur River very much of these are missing .. The trick is that he is a river-sea! Will go into the estuary - look for candles! And at the very 8 Caliber ... And h.z. how many of them are vigorous and how many electronic and other variations .. (I do not think that we know the entire arsenal of warheads for Caliber). And if they were hidden in the river ducts 2-3? How many tank brigades can they return to liquid state?
          1. +3
            12 July 2018 15: 31
            Here you are absolutely right.
            Quote: Tahtvjd2868
            I don’t think we know the whole arsenal of warheads for calibers
          2. +2
            12 July 2018 15: 51
            Quote: Tahtvjd2868
            You are wrong .. Here we are on the Amur River very much of these are missing .. The trick is that he is a river-sea! Will go into the estuary - look for candles! And at the very 8 Caliber ... And h.z. how many of them are vigorous and how many electronic and other variations .. (I do not think that we know the entire arsenal of warheads for Caliber). And if they were hidden in the river ducts 2-3? How many tank brigades can they return to liquid state?

            Duc, on the Amur, they belong! But not in the Ocean, as many believe, only for availability, on them CMSB ..)
            Or in the coastal zone .. We, however, try to "fix" them, everywhere
    3. +1
      12 July 2018 15: 05
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      Why is this boat not a galley of the XX1 century?

      There are no oars, and the "hydro-soldiers" for boarding will also not be enough. bully
      1. +1
        12 July 2018 17: 37
        Alexander hi How many calibers are there in Varshavyanka 4 or 6?
  5. +2
    12 July 2018 15: 35
    that's curious. when they finish the last 6 of the series with ZRPK. The first six will be returned to rework ... and the charter of this Shell?
    It was logical ...
    1. +3
      12 July 2018 16: 35
      After many years it’s possible to deliver. For example, the guard the Undaunted was designed for the installation of RCC Uranus. 20 years have passed, and there are still no missiles. And there are a lot of such examples in the fleet. So anything is possible
  6. +4
    12 July 2018 15: 43
    The article does not indicate that such a small boat is planned to be commissioned in 2023! 4,5 years on this boat, what’s it called?
    1. +2
      12 July 2018 15: 45
      In the distant "shovels" -TAMPERATION!
      Today, the star of the "Hero" is given for the state. acceptance .. (
    2. 0
      12 July 2018 16: 02
      But the Karakuts do not do the same thing in parallel at the same time?
      I would transfer the first options with "Flexible" to the Far East. They cannot be taken either by the Yapam or the Yankee or the Chinese - the fleet will not enter the river, the aircraft will not fly .. but they can shoot at all of them completely .. and more than once. With Carapace most likely there will be more sediment .. for the river - not ice. His marine colleague here will be the first target to happen that .. and the Shell will not save ..
  7. 0
    12 July 2018 17: 30
    All Buyan-M with calibers will be? Or a few with Onyx?
    1. 0
      13 July 2018 12: 01
      UKKS under “Caliber” and “Onyx” are one and the same, and control systems are different (based on what they write). Given that even on 11356 - only "Caliber", here is the same story (probably). Onnix surface carriers will be the Upgraded Eagles and 22350 frigates
  8. 0
    12 July 2018 19: 07
    Today it was reported that this ship will be handed over to the fleet back in 2023. Those. it will take 5 (five) years to build the ship. A normal shipyard, with the normal organization of construction, will cope with a serial ship in 2-2,5 years.
  9. +3
    12 July 2018 21: 14
    I wonder what engines will be put on the latest 6 cases? After the torment with the Chinese on “V. Volochek,” they are unlikely to go this way, but then what to put? But the installation sites are designed under the mun-ovskie. As for the "Pantsirey-M", it is unlikely that they will be installed on the top three under construction, most likely, only on the last three.
    1. 0
      13 July 2018 11: 25
      As for the "Shell-M", it is unlikely that they will be installed in the first three under construction, most likely only in the last three.
      I wonder why this is so .... I noticed we do not have such a practice ... to upgrade ships of the same series to the same standard ??? ... it turns out that in the horseradish series you will find 2 identical ships ..... (and the same in aviation)
      1. +2
        13 July 2018 18: 33
        When designing and laying the ship, shipbuilders, as a rule, rely on the mass-produced products of the ship’s "stuffing" (RV, ReV, etc.), which sometimes may no longer meet modern requirements. In addition, the process of building a ship, especially their series, we have a long, during this time, are being tested and are preparing to adopt the more advanced models of "stuffing" that can "pull" the new ship to the level of modern requirements. Here begins the "pereachinka" building under construction. Moreover, our fleet samples of ZRV are converted land, which have been fully tested in the NE, and the creation of which takes a lot of time, taking into account that naval armament is not our priority. That was late "Pantsir-M".
  10. 0
    13 July 2018 14: 24
    Quote: Ugolek
    The article does not indicate that such a small boat is planned to be commissioned in 2023! 4,5 years on this boat, what’s it called?


    Yes, it’s straight, on average, a year and a half leaves the ship. From 10 to 18 years in service 6 MRK. And this is not a boat, but a corvette. A ship of the third rank.
  11. 0
    3 August 2018 17: 24
    Crew - 52 person.


    Isn’t it too much for such a small ship?
    1. 0
      3 August 2018 17: 42
      Swedish corvette Visby - a crew of 43 people.

    2. 0
      3 August 2018 17: 53
      https://topwar.ru/35324-pervye-v-mire-boevye-kora
      bli-nevidimki-korvety-proekta-visby-shveciya.html

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"