Trump's mission: to report back to Putin about the collapse of NATO

29
US President Donald Trump once again demonstrated his amazing ... predictability! As many experts have suggested, he is trying to use the NATO summit that has begun to promote American economic interests.





Immediately after arriving in Brussels, during a working breakfast with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, the American leader began to complain to him about Germany, probably hoping to enlist his support in the issue of countering Nord Stream 2.

“Germany pays billions of dollars a year to Russia, and we protect this country from Russia. They are building a gas pipeline, the purpose of which is to pay billions of dollars to the treasury of Russia, Trump complained bitterly to his interlocutor. - Germany should not have been allowed this. Germany is fully controlled by Russia. ”

However, it is obvious to everyone, and especially Trump's vis-à-vis, that Washington cares not so much about “turning Germany into a hostage of Russia”, as about the potential losses of American energy dealers on the European market, from which they intended to completely oust Russian suppliers.

No less disturbing to Americans is the fact that the implementation of the Nord Stream-2 project significantly increases the influence of Berlin on the energy market of the continent, which, in turn, strengthens not only the economic but also geopolitical positions of Germany. What is especially disturbing is the United States, which lately almost officially regards the FRG as a rival and competitor rather than as an ally.



So there is nothing surprising that Trump first of all tried to secure the support of the NATO leadership in the upcoming fight with Berlin at the summit. True, it did not succeed at all. Since Jens Stoltenberg, like the unforgettable comrade Jabrail from the “Caucasian Captive”, advised Trump not to confuse his personal wool with the state wool. He pointed out that the issue of "Nord Stream-2" is outside the format of the North Atlantic Alliance, and it will not get into this conflict.

Trump's mission: to report back to Putin about the collapse of NATO


“Among the allies there is disagreement on the“ Nord Stream-2 ”, it is well known. But it’s not NATO to decide, it’s a national decision, ”RIA quotes StoltenbergNews».

Moreover, the NATO Secretary General made it clear that the manipulations of the American leader regarding the "hostages" and "Russian threat" did not impress him too much.

“We do not see any imminent threat against any member of the alliance, but we see an increasingly self-confident Russian Federation that has used force against its neighbors,” he said, making it clear that he preferred a substantive conversation to propaganda chatter.

There is no doubt that this instruction is directly addressed to the American leader, who in recent times has been constantly convincing the Europeans that only the US will save them from the inevitable Russian aggression, and you have to pay for it.

That is, the NATO Secretary General hinted that not only would not, on behalf of the alliance, support the US claims against Germany, but he was also ready to oppose the American delegation if they tried to impose a forum agenda based on obvious and all weary distortions.



At the same time, we need to take into account that this is not talking about a change in the alliance’s attitude towards our country, but about growing irritation towards the American leader, who “got hold of” with his arrogance and blunt egocentrism. And Stoltenberg “put” him on the “Russian question” not out of sympathy for our country, but because here it is easiest to catch him with lies and contradictions.

In particular, the fact that the American president frightens his allies with the “Russian threat” and demands that the economic contacts with Moscow be stopped just before he goes to Helsinki to conclude a “separate peace” with Putin and negotiate mutually beneficial cooperation.

And this, admittedly, is a very bad sign for the United States. NATO Secretary Generals were always figures mostly nominal and acted as agents of American politics. And even verbal disagreement with the "American Pope" was out of the question.

It should also be noted that Donald Trump chose the most unfortunate of all possible behaviors at the summit.

Without a doubt, at a meeting with Vladimir Putin, he needs to act not just as the president of the United States, but also as the leader of a united Western world that enjoys the full and absolute support of the North Atlantic alliance.

In light of this, it would be reasonable at the current summit to avoid sharp corners and not actualize numerous internal contradictions, but to concentrate on the truly unifying issues, demonstrating the unity and solidarity of the bloc.

However, Trump, as we see, does the opposite. And even if he succeeds in "pushing the Germans" and those who support them, this victory will be Pyrrhic, since there will be no agreement or even his imitation of speech.



In any case, snide comments have already begun to appear in the western media space, such as “After Brussels, Trump goes to Helsinki to report to Putin about the collapse of NATO.”
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 July 2018 05: 34
    Trump goes to Helsinki to report to Putin about the collapse of NATO. "
    Let him file a report in triplicate! drinks drinks drinks
    1. +1
      12 July 2018 05: 59
      And they’ll stick somewhere their energy sources. They have nothing to do in Europe.
      1. +1
        12 July 2018 06: 04
        This is a business. And there are no brothers!
        1. 0
          12 July 2018 10: 06
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          This is a business. And there are no brothers!

          Only we sell gas to the Enemies, and he can’t sell to Partners .. Here and who is right here? Are we saving money for our Enemies or the USA? The West will expand NATO with the money saved.
          1. +2
            12 July 2018 11: 52
            By and large, to sell the national treasure is a crime against the people and our descendants. But! We have what we have. Unfortunately.
            1. dSK
              0
              12 July 2018 12: 44
              Quote from Uncle Lee
              By and large

              Trump's mission: to report back to Putin about the collapse of NATO

              "Dreams, dreams - what a sweet ...
              Dreams are gone - disgust remains ... "
      2. 0
        12 July 2018 13: 45
        Quote: bald
        And they’ll stick somewhere their energy sources. They have nothing to do in Europe.

        Most likely, we will have to share the market, but not at the expense of stopping Nord Stream-2, but at the expense of a fixed volume of gas supplies below the planned capacity in order to leave a niche for expensive American LNG, which, when mixed with cheap Russian, will equalize the total price to the average gas price in the European market. Probably this decision will suit everyone. But the question is, what is the United States willing to give up for Russia agreeing to cut back on supplies? The proposal should be interesting, since Russia will be able to compensate for these "lost" volumes with the commissioning of the Power of Siberia.
        1. -1
          12 July 2018 15: 31
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Most likely we’ll have to share the market, but not at the expense of the Nord Stream-2

          But what about the reduction in revenues from oil and gas dollars? Can the whole country then sell resources to our enemies? And do nothing else?
          1. dSK
            0
            12 July 2018 17: 02
            Quote: Semen1972
            do nothing else?

            “At a briefing, Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that Macedonia’s entry into NATO will begin. The Balkans, with the exception of Serbia and Bosnia, which is partially inhabited by Serbs, are fully transferred to the Euro-Atlantic orbit.
            The heads of state and government of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan attended the NATO summit. Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg promised Georgia membership in the bloc. ... the de facto process of Georgia’s integration into NATO is in full swing. While the Russian base is in Gyumri, Borjomi is being sold in Moscow, a bridge is being built across the Astara River connecting Russia with Iran through Azerbaijan, and Baku and Yerevan are “sitting” on Russian arms, it’s premature to say the loss of Transcaucasia. But not to notice the gradual atlantization of Transcaucasia, somewhere more, somewhere less - this, as Talleyrand said, “not a crime, this is a mistake” .... (TV Tsargrad, 16:32, 12/07/18 "Russia is losing Transcaucasia".)
          2. 0
            12 July 2018 21: 20
            Quote: Semen1972
            But what about the reduction in revenues from oil and gas dollars? Can the whole country then sell resources to our enemies? And do nothing else?

            I re-read your comment several times, but did not understand the depth of your thought. Translate hi
        2. 0
          12 July 2018 19: 03
          And why did you get that EVEN if Putin "agrees to allocate a quota in the EU for American LNG," then the Europeans themselves will buy the American? Any LNG, even ours from Yamal, even Qatari, and even from Sakhalin, can buy the same Germany or benefit. tongue Moreover, if you look at those “miracles” that are happening with Russian LNG from Yamal, it’s amazing even for the United States to send it to the “country that floods the World with gas” in the winter. Yes, yes, through the cunning scheme of two three resales, but because of this, the gas did not become “democratically” Qatari, nor any other, like a tanker from the Yamal Peninsula, it floated into the mattress laughing good
          1. 0
            12 July 2018 21: 19
            Quote: Mih1974
            And why did you get that EVEN if Putin "agrees to allocate a quota in the EU for American LNG," then the Europeans themselves will buy the American?

            Do they have a choice? Trump bluntly said, “From what“ vegetable ”does Germany pay billions of dollars to Russia despite the fact that the United States protects it from Russia? In Germany itself, 35 American troops are stationed, which is not a weak lever for pressure on Berlin. Germany is not interested in losing the SP-2, but there is no way to leave everything as it plans, and therefore it will be necessary to advance in something.
            Quote: Mih1974
            Any LNG, even ours from Yamal, even Qatari, and even from Sakhalin can buy the same Germany or benefit. Moreover, if you look at those "miracles" that happen to Russian LNG from Yamal, it’s amazing even to get to the "country that floods the World with gas" The United States sent it in the winter. Yes, yes, through the cunning scheme of two three resales, but because of this, the gas did not become “democratically” Qatari, nor any other, like a tanker from the Yamal Peninsula, it floated into the mattress

            I do not argue. The gas that the United States will inject into Germany and Europe in general may very well have Russian origin, which they will buy from another company. The producer does not care where its gas goes, because it receives its money from anyone.
    2. 0
      12 July 2018 13: 38
      When they "catch" - it will be bad ...
  2. +9
    12 July 2018 06: 38
    Whatever it was, Trump is a true patriot of his country and makes every effort to ensure its financial well-being, namely for the country, in contrast to the "our" lackeys, who do not get drunk and pull everything in their pockets. Let him act sometimes awkwardly, but he will achieve his goal, they will not go anywhere.
    1. +1
      12 July 2018 07: 23
      Quote: lis-ik
      Trump is a true patriot of his country

      I’ll clarify - the countries of the parasite living at the expense of the rest of the World.
      1. +1
        12 July 2018 09: 00
        Quote: Boris55
        Quote: lis-ik
        Trump is a true patriot of his country

        I’ll clarify - the countries of the parasite living at the expense of the rest of the World.

        I agree. And his current policy shows that the United States is ending a period of time when you could just print "candy wrappers" and change them to real values. Demand for candy wrappers fell, and this led to the need to change policies.
      2. 0
        12 July 2018 15: 37
        Quote: Boris55
        I’ll clarify - the countries of the parasite living at the expense of the rest of the World

        Their parasitic computers, airplanes, telephones, medicines, etc. are better than our hard-working ones. Our economy, based on your logic, is much better than the USA? Our goods are better, labor productivity is higher, scientists are smarter, rulers are more correct. But we do not parasitize, therefore we have sn 500 bucks, against 3000 of them
      3. 0
        17 July 2018 11: 16
        As they can and turn around.
  3. +5
    12 July 2018 07: 12
    All his actions fit well into his “first of all the USA” course, and pushing the increase in NATO spending for this NATO to 4% GDP is now quite an adequate requirement and looks just like a trade war with China in the struggle for the US economy.
    1. +4
      12 July 2018 07: 20
      Quote: Nix1986
      All his actions fit well into his “first of all the USA” course, and pushing the increase in NATO spending for this NATO to 4% GDP is now quite an adequate requirement and looks just like a trade war with China in the struggle for the US economy.

      So it’s quite logical actions for itself, it simply removes freeloaders, in due time if the USSR had not dragged the whole Warsaw Pact on itself, God knows how history would have turned. And it turns out with Western Europe, as in the famous proverb "They want to eat fish and ............. sit down."
  4. +1
    12 July 2018 07: 32
    "After Brussels, Trump travels to Helsinki to report to Putin on the collapse of NATO."
    .... Yes, it is unlikely that this will happen ... History repeats itself. If anyone remembers, the construction of the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod gas pipeline. Then the United States announced sanctions on the supply of pipes and equipment to the USSR, but Western Europe did not support Americans and NATO it didn’t fall apart. At that time they wrote that they say, “if there is a war tomorrow, if the enemy attacks” ... “We will turn off the gas for Tom” ... The imposition of liquefied gas supplies to Western Europe has been going on for a long time. The United States is carrying out various actions for this. in Ukraine, they invested 5 lard for which it would become more expensive to get gas from Russia through Ukraine. It didn’t, Libya, Syria, for which conflicts in these countries were unleashed, for the same purpose .. But it turned out "there are methods against Kostya Saprykina "... And Trump goes to Helsinki to discuss the gas issue ..
  5. +2
    12 July 2018 08: 16
    about the growing irritation towards the American leader, who "got everyone" with his arrogance and stupid egocentrism
    Well, even if the NATO Secretary General is trying to contradict Trump, then things really are not at all rosy even taking into account the adoption of a statement in support of London, opposition to Russia, etc.
  6. 0
    12 July 2018 09: 35
    -Maybe Trump will offer Putin (Russia) to join NATO ... -It is urgently necessary for Russia to look for somewhere around $ 2 billion ... -or American "Russian" securities will be used ...
  7. 0
    12 July 2018 10: 16
    In fact, the result will be this: the production and sales of advanced weapons systems in the United States will grow significantly. The European "partners" will be militarized "I can’t do it at all" and this colossus is obliged to move somewhere, otherwise - an economic disaster. Explain to you where she will go? Example - Georgia before "080808" - military spending up to 30% of GDP. If, moreover, Germany stops the "joint venture", this is a war.
    1. 0
      12 July 2018 16: 20
      Quote: iouris
      If, moreover, Germany stops the "joint venture", this is a war.

      who with whom ?! request
  8. +1
    12 July 2018 12: 05
    Ask Trump better to tell Putin about our pension reform, otherwise our cunning prime secretly turns it over, and the president is not in the know sad
  9. 0
    12 July 2018 16: 18
    The separate world seems to be as follows - Trump is pushing his gas instead of Russian by increasing the Yankee military contingent in Europe and the supply of weapons, arguing that this is protection against Russian aggression. For Europe saves on the army, but the USA does not. What, then, will Putin receive in exchange for the loss of the market ?! Well, they will throw a bone in the form of southern Syria, the United States is not going to give up anything else, no matter how they dream here. I don’t see other options, recognition of the Crimea, or is there a US withdrawal from Europe, the collapse of NATO, complete nonsense, sorry
  10. 0
    12 July 2018 18: 42
    Boris Jerilevsky! Send your articles to Trump. I think that reading your articles is guaranteed to lead him to death from laughter.
  11. 0
    15 July 2018 12: 46
    Since Jens Stoltenberg, like the unforgettable comrade Jabrail of the "Caucasian Captive", advised Trump not to confuse his personal coat with the state.
    Whatever protagonist the NATO Secretary General is, he is very well aware that Russia can respond to such ideas. Namely - dear Europeans! Aren't you tired of this American uncle? Could you and I conclude a military alliance? Ms. Merkel, you understand quite well what such a “threat” comes from us. The threat is terrible - we want to trade profitably with you. We have a short transport shoulder, we are reliable partners to obstinacy, and we do not plan any expansion other than trading in resources, since we cannot imagine why we need such expansion.
    And we are able to protect by military force from anyone, including from ... The time for global robbery, when NATO served as a convenient roof under which Europe robbed the world, is complete. There was no one to rob, as the subject of robbery has changed. Who needs the territories now and why? What about working hands? Where would you put yours ..
    Stoltenberg does not want to suddenly hear all this from the Kremlin. Very, very unwilling ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"