Hypertech Snibot. The French have come up with a sniper robot

In France, decided to replace the police snipers robots. The first successes are already there, the French company SD4E has demonstrated a mobile robotic platform on which a high-precision sniper system is installed.

The platform received the name Snibot from the developers and, as the representative of the company Michel Yakovleff claims, this robot has “hyper-accuracy”. According to him, he is guaranteed to hit the same point on the body with several shots from a distance of 200-300 meters. In this case, as conceived by the creators of the platform, the main task of the robot is not to destroy the offender, but to neutralize the threat. The program of the robot "prescribed" a ban on the defeat of the torso and the human head, allowed shooting only at the limbs. There are no TTX platforms, neither the caliber of the sniper complex, nor the rate of fire, nor other technical details are known.

The SD4E company positions the Snibot robotic sniper platform as a means of protecting important sensitive objects, and, according to the developers, the robot can be used in police operations, as well as involved in combat operations.

Comments

[MPN]

The program of the robot "spelled out" a ban on the defeat of the body and head

I would still allow shooting at the genitals ...

[Vard]

And if this is a woman ...

[MPN]

The enemy has no gender ... They have gender justice, a little sight to fix, so that the type is not hanging ...

[Shurik70]

The program of the robot “spells out” a ban on the defeat of the torso and head of a person; shooting on limbs is allowed

Is this not a man aiming through a television camera, but the robot himself aiming and shooting?
OH-HH-NO! Hacker services are becoming even more popular.

[MPN]

Quote: Shurik70

Hacker services are becoming even more popular.

And more expensive and the "killer" does not blurt out who the customer is.

[Shurik70]

Sometimes it can work for free

[AID.S]

Quote: Vard

And if this is a woman ...

Rubber ... bullet.

[MPN]

Quote: AID.S

Quote: Vard

And if this is a woman ...

Rubber ... bullet.

Here it’s necessary to deal with the caliber seriously.

[USSR-1]

Quote: Vard

And if this is a woman ...

Let him shoot, and after modernization he will shoot dildos. In the geyropa, it is already difficult to distinguish by gender

[Ren]

Quote: MPN

I would still allow shooting at the genitals ...

And if the robot will work on yours?
There are several reasonable explanations:
1. Do not mind.
2. No longer used as intended.
3. Sadomaso
4. Use other body irregularities on the model of general human beings.

[igorka357]

On such a platform? Hyperto .. Yeah .. I believe .. From what distance, from 10m, what caliber, 4.5 ..

[Kondratko]

Quote: igorka357

On such a platform?

It’s difficult to determine the size of the photo, it may have a base like a jeep or a tank (that’s it). )))
The sizes, after all, were not voiced either.

There is no TTX platform, neither the caliber of the sniper complex, nor the rate of fire, nor other technical details are known.

custodians ...

[just exp]

the hands of the robot do not tremble when holding a rifle. optics has a large increase.
why not be more precise than most people?

[dvina71]

Quote: just explo

why not be more precise than most people?

Because even a barrel clamped into a machine will not give accuracy to a bullet several times. Because each subsequent shot is different in terms. Starting from a gust of wind and ending with an incomplete identity of dust and a hitch.

[Topotun]

I would add that the chassis after each shot will also be at least a little but “go away”.

[Imobile]

That is, do you think that after a shot the robot completely turns off the electronics and it can’t aim again?

[Topotun]

I suppose it will be downloaded, therefore, we are not talking about the accuracy of a bullet in a bullet. In my opinion. Especially at a distance of more than 200 meters.

[Imobile]

On the contrary, with a sufficiently rigid mount, the accuracy will be much more accurate than in humans. Will not hold your breath, etc. Plus, you can screw the AI ​​and neuroscience, plus the electromagnetic correction of the trunk. It's like competing with a computer in the multiplication table.

[Topotun]

Only on a fixed chassis, i.e. not in motion. In addition, as I wrote below, there are big problems with automatic aiming. Especially in a moving person. The shape of the target changes, by what criteria do you aim weapons?

[just exp]

Do not believe it, automation in motion shot better than a person back in the 50s of the 20th century.

[Bypassed]

The first shot always happens on a cold barrel

[Imobile]

Neural networks will be able to bring a shot on a "cold" trunk to 100% accuracy

[Kerensky]

The first shot always happens on the "cold"

And on a clean trunk.

[AID.S]

Quote: dvina71

Because even a barrel clamped into a machine will not give accuracy to a bullet several times. Because each subsequent shot is different in terms. Starting from a gust of wind and ending with an incomplete identity of dust and a hitch.

The article says that "According to him, he is guaranteed to hit the same point on the body with several shots from a distance of 200-300 meters." What deny what is already there? Like the Crimean bridge. It is clear that a computer can do a lot faster and better than a person, and this much tends to the absolute, not reachable to a person.

[Topotun]

The computer may, but the question arises here. How to aim? After all, the signature of the target (especially moving) at such a distance changes all the time. By what parameter will the comp guide? By contrast? Will not do. Too unstable criterion. The camcorder is not the human eye. More precisely, the camera-PC bundle is not the same as the eye-brain.

[Blackmokona]

Optical recognition using neural networks. According to tests, they have already surpassed man.

[Topotun]

Yeah, at the estimated power of stationary computers and not in a rapidly changing street situation. Not to mention combat with its smoke, explosions, etc.
However, time will tell.

[Blackmokona]

So the communication channel will be at least a supercomputer (and in police operations you can even plug in the optics), and it doesn’t care for the computer in rapidly changing situations, it will recognize it in separate frames. That is, only speed is needed.

[Imobile]

Again, based on neuro-learning. Now even cheap smartphones easily make a person stand out and even figure out a smile. Here the electronics will be better. And even if now it cannot hit a moving target, then after training or flashing it can, it is not necessary to change the hardware component

[AID.S]

Quote: Topotun

The computer may, but the question arises here. How to aim? After all, the signature of the target (especially moving) at such a distance changes all the time. By what parameter will the comp guide?

Already have a mosquito laser. Range of defeat - 30m. In this case, the selection and destruction of malaria mosquitoes is carried out. So there are no problems with guidance, except for a blank fence.

[Mexovoy]

The robot is a sniper not because the rifle is on a wheeled chassis, but because the calculation of ballistics is automatic.
https://topwar.ru/103400-novyy-rossiyskiy-robot-s
nayper-rs1a3-minirex.html

[svp67]

French "robocop". Interesting.

[novel66]

it’s better not to go to France

[Kerensky]

positions the Snibot robotic sniper platform as means of protection of important sensitive objects,

Oh I doubt I'm pretty! As a means of protection, he does not really need self-propelled equipment. It’s easier and more reliable to screw the turret where necessary. And accuracy is not important here, you can simply cover the sector with a hail of damaging elements. Manufacturers are cunning of something, not for that. But where can it be applied?

[M. Michelson]

It would be reasonable to entrust the support of state leaders to such robots. And then, when I hear about people snipers, traditionally placed on the roofs of houses along the route, the heart clenches in fear for the protected persons. (Recall Indira Gandhi. Yes, and, according to the conspiracy theories, Kennedy was shot by a guard ...