Well, for the duties ... China officially entered the trade war with the US

38
If, until today, the phrase “the trade war between China and the United States” might have seemed like a media scary, now it is taking on quite real outlines. From today, official Beijing imposed duties on more than eight hundred American goods. The total amount of import duties for the US economy will be more than 34 billion dollars.

Well, for the duties ... China officially entered the trade war with the US




It is reported that 818 products manufactured by companies from the United States of America came under the Chinese response program of duties. In this case, the level of fees amounted to 25%. It was previously stated that China introduces duties on approximately 650 US products. Among these products are electronics and household appliances, a large segment of food and hygiene products. We are also talking about petrochemical products, vehicles and agricultural equipment, medical equipment, products for the energy sector and various types of industry.

Earlier, the press service of the White House said that the United States intends to impose additional duties on Chinese goods in the amount of 50 billion dollars. Thus, the total damage from the mutual introduction of additional fees will be almost 85 billion dollars. This is more than 14% of the total turnover of China and the United States.

In Beijing, it is noted that the introduction of additional duties on American goods is a necessary measure. At the same time, it is emphasized that it will be canceled at the same time as a similar step on the part of Washington.

It should be recalled that China remains the main holder of American debt. The share of China in 2017 accounted for about 1,1 trillion dollars of US debt.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +10
    6 July 2018 12: 29
    If goods cannot cross borders, then armies cross them ....
    1. MPN
      +6
      6 July 2018 12: 38
      and hygiene products
      The Procter & Gamble Company swung? They have a large army, and there is a sea of ​​occupied territories ... winked
    2. +14
      6 July 2018 12: 39
      Greg Miller (Swimmer)
      If goods cannot cross borders, then armies cross them ...

      The author of this aphorism, was not familiar with nuclear weapons
      1. +1
        6 July 2018 12: 55
        They will agree somehow, the Chinese will buy more bonds and win back
        1. +6
          6 July 2018 12: 58
          The likely outcome.
          China now, like the USSR, before the attack of Nazi Germany, is trying by all means to push the start of aggression.
          To get time to strengthen their own country.
        2. +2
          6 July 2018 13: 05
          Quote: maxim947
          Agree somehow

          Both economists and political scientists, around the world, believe that the time for treaties has passed. The "big redistribution" has begun
          1. 0
            6 July 2018 14: 22
            Exactly as many political scientists say the opposite,
      2. +4
        6 July 2018 13: 12
        Alas, nuclear weapons are not a panacea. As the experience of Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and many other countries shows. And the experience of the First and Second World Wars, too.
        1. +3
          6 July 2018 13: 26
          What the United States, what China's countries are young and very similar in formation. That is why it was so easy to agree on a joint anti-SOVIET policy. Today they play among themselves the first place in the ranking of the economy and other things. So nothing new.
          Mantras about the * antiquity of the Chinese culture * have nothing to do with the Chinese. They are invaders of land with ancient civilizations and the same ruthless destruction of Aboriginal people as the Americans.
        2. +3
          6 July 2018 13: 39
          Quote: Topotun
          Alas, nuclear weapons are not a panacea

          Of course not. But it prevents the possibility of global war. And the number of local wars, provocations and coups, apparently, will only grow
  3. +4
    6 July 2018 12: 30
    in relation to more than eight hundred American goods
    Something tells us that they will not stop there, because Americans threaten with new duties.
    China accounted for about $ 2017 trillion of US debt in 1,1
    Apparently Trump does not think about it. For him, the main thing is that China obeys its requirements. We'll see.
    1. +2
      6 July 2018 12: 32
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Something tells us that they will not stop there, because Americans threaten with new duties.

      The trade balance is not in favor of China, they will break and make concessions.
      1. +5
        6 July 2018 12: 50
        Quote: Puncher
        The trade balance is not in favor of China, they will break and make concessions.

        Not the fact that they will break.
        Firstly, a huge own market. The share of exports in China's GDP over 10 years, from 2006 to 2016, decreased from 35.7% to 19.6%
        Secondly, the USA is not the whole world. Last year, China's exports generally grew amid falling US exports. China is actively exploring other markets. For example, the share of China in total Asian exports over the same 10 years has grown one and a half times.
        1. 0
          6 July 2018 13: 15
          hi In any case, not only the United States and China will suffer from this trade war. And someone, quite possibly, will try to extract profit.
      2. +1
        6 July 2018 13: 55
        The trade balance is not in favor of China, they will break and make concessions.

        I mean, not in favor?
        Just in favor. And the United States wants to at least equalize.
        1. 0
          6 July 2018 20: 13
          Quote: bk316
          Just in favor. And the United States wants to at least equalize

          I’m talking about this, the balance is in favor of China and they will suffer great losses. The US market is more important for China than China for the USA
  4. +7
    6 July 2018 12: 36
    Introducing duties on American goods, the Chinese probably thought it over well .. And if the United States ceases to supply these goods, the PRC will not experience a deficit in these goods ....
    1. 0
      6 July 2018 20: 15
      Quote: parusnik
      the Chinese are probably well thought out ..

      They have nowhere to go, they have no alternative to the United States.
  5. +5
    6 July 2018 12: 37
    China has quietly spread its grip on all countries. They will stand on their own exchanges, expand the calculation in RMB, turn US debt into real assets of China and be a war. The United States will have no other choice, either slaughter or bankrupt
  6. +9
    6 July 2018 12: 41
    Well, if we discard the topic of geopolitical idols, friends and allies, then the truth is not quite on the side of China. For three decades, the Chinese have violated copyrights everywhere, copied technologies and products, artificially lowered their own currency, thereby giving a huge advantage to their enterprises and firms. As they say with us - everything seems to be kosher but it smells bad laughing

    Trump, by and large, is not against China or Europe, he is for his own. But the market conditions at the moment are such that all of these duties will most likely not help their own, they will only do much harm, and along the way, will harm everyone else. It would be better, of course, to come to an agreement, the Europeans and the Chinese were ready to compromise, but Trump is impulsive with a club, he has no patience for this. wassat
    1. +7
      6 July 2018 13: 07
      Quote: Xander
      Well, if we discard the topic of geopolitical idols, friends and allies, then the truth is not quite on the side of China.

      Right Only the United States has the right to aggression, no one has the right to defend against such aggression.
      Fact: Preparations for the war with China, actually a U.S. ally in the Cold War, began in the U.S. in 1992. It was then that the new American concept of “Air-Sea Battle” “surfaced” suddenly
      In China, they quickly realized what to expect from the former "ally" and by hook or by crook began to strengthen the country's industrial and economic power, as happened under Stalin before the war against the Nazis.
      1. +3
        6 July 2018 14: 56
        Kamrad Lopatov, it was about duties, trade balance and economy laughing

        Well, if you wield your logic, in contrast, you can add a lot of things about any central player on the planet, including China. For example, how China forever threatens Taiwan and does not stop preparing for a military solution to this problem of its own, how wildly captures the controversial islets in the middle of the seas and oceans for which a couple more countries claim. But the truth, why negotiate, sailed, dug trenches, concreted airfields, scared all the fishermen around - the right of the strong. So don’t need "Only the United States has the right to aggression" tongue
        1. +2
          6 July 2018 15: 07
          Quote: Xander
          Well, if you wield your logic

          This is not my logic, this is the logic of China.

          Quote: Xander
          For example, how China forever threatens Taiwan and does not stop preparing for a military solution to this problem of its own, how wildly captures the controversial islets in the middle of the seas and oceans for which a couple more countries claim.

          And who elevated the "right of the strong" over international law? Again, the Americans. Why do you think that China cannot rely on this right? Do we already have countries of different varieties segregated by their rights?
          1. +4
            6 July 2018 15: 09
            And who elevated the "right of the strong" over international law? Again, the Americans.


            Well this is not serious, right? The history of mankind did not begin three hundred years ago, or do you want to tell us something? laughing
            1. +2
              6 July 2018 15: 36
              Quote: Xander
              Well this is not serious, right?

              Absolutely seriously. The triumphant return of the Strong's Law to modern international politics is completely and completely “merit” of the USA.
    2. +3
      6 July 2018 13: 19
      Trump really is clearly bending over .. He and his advisers are very bad in my opinion .. He’s not going to push the Chinese so easily. It feels like the truth acts like a club ...
      1. +1
        6 July 2018 14: 19
        Quote: cariperpaint
        He and his advisers are very bad in my opinion ..

        Duc, he has one adviser. Yes Just one ... Concurrently - son-in-law. laughing
    3. +2
      6 July 2018 20: 16
      Quote: Xander
      but Trump is impulsive with a club, he has no patience for this

      You underestimate him
  7. +1
    6 July 2018 12: 54
    Pipes and wine Russia can replace American ones even now, with pork it is more difficult, you have to wait two or three years. Household chemicals are also in bulk.
    1. +4
      6 July 2018 14: 22
      Quote: TarasVE
      Pipes and wine Russia can replace American even now,

      And all would be fine, but the article narrates about the war of China and Matrasia, not a word about Russia. wassat
  8. +1
    6 July 2018 13: 24
    What is it to us?
    1. 0
      6 July 2018 17: 03
      What is it to us?
      Yes, in general, no matter what .. So, stick out .. In a month or two in all stores in the country!
      1. 0
        6 July 2018 22: 51
        I doubt very much.
  9. 0
    6 July 2018 13: 33
    As some residents of this site often say: it's time to stock up on popcorn. smile
  10. +2
    6 July 2018 13: 34
    We, most importantly, do not miss our interests in this war! It’s time to learn and take advantage of all sorts of situations there.
  11. +1
    6 July 2018 15: 39
    There are a lot of figures, and in short, while the draw is 34 to 34 billion. And this is just the beginning.
    The Washington Post believes that the confrontation between the United States and China could result in an "unprecedented trade battle between the two largest economies in the world."
  12. 0
    7 July 2018 13: 26
    -China will never enter a real war with the United States ... -not in the trade ... nor in any other ...
    -And here with Russia ...- easily ... -Otherwise ... why China has such a "space" number of ground forces and an innumerable number of tanks and other "ground land weapons" ...
  13. 0
    8 July 2018 16: 07
    Last year, China shipped 506 billion worth of products to the USA, and the United States only 130 billion. If the US gradually spins up the flywheel of additional duties, China will have to tighten.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"