Military Review

Participants in future wars. Instructions for survival. Part of 1

56
The article was written based on the results of what he saw and was meaningful by the author in a variety of hot spots. It accumulates the experience of fighters who fought in Afghanistan, Georgia, Dagestan, Chechnya and participated in other local conflicts (except Syria). We hope that in future wars of the future, the article-instruction will help fighters not only to carry out combat missions, but also to survive in the most extreme circumstances.


Participants in future wars. Instructions for survival. Part of 1


Learn the art of reincarnation and the language of your enemy

In both Afghanistan and Chechnya, in their raids on the rear of the special forces, soldiers sometimes suddenly faced the enemy face to face. In such cases, it is not very clear how to behave. To open fire at close range and to defeat - you will die yourself (the enemy will not wait for the code, you will shoot him, as in a dash). And what's the use of you, the dead, even if you collapse some kind of authoritative "spirit"? Just peacefully disperse - the righteous wrath of the authorities will fall upon your head: chickened out, scoundrel, did not kill the enemy, disgraced the epaulets! The authorities in their cozy offices always know better how to behave in such situations. Some very intelligent and promising specialists after a “peaceful expenditure” career collapsed to the level of the curb. Question: what to do?

First, you have to be prepared for this. What if you still see the enemy half a second earlier? Then you immediately have a magical chance. The second. Play "under your own." Let the opponent know that you are the same as he, you are one of them. How? All those who hunt in the woods, fields and deserts for their own kind, after a week of traveling really become similar to each other: dirty, ragged, with weekly stubble on the face. Often only one thing can expose you - your tongue. Therefore, learn the language of the enemy! For a while in an emergency you can pass for yours. This is enough for you to save your life and either evaporate or take the life of the enemy. At a minimum, study key phrases that are adequate to the moment (which specifically - non-public information). Learning them is easy. These saving phrases are literally five or six. But, on time and correctly said (accent, pronunciation here also play a key role), they will give you life. The enemy literally for a couple of seconds will doubt and ease the pressure of the finger on the trigger. That will be enough for you.

A living example from the Chechen war. The Basayev column before the assault on Budyonnovsk went through several dozen police posts without hindrance. Like a knife in butter. Satan’s plan (as Basayev called the Russian press) was brilliant. The column depicted Russian contract soldiers who were returning to their unit and carrying the bodies of their dead colleagues in the “coffins” (in fact, there were weapon and ammunition). The driver of one of the cars was a Russian prisoner. As for the Chechens, Satan picked up similar ones to the Russians (among the mountaineers such people are found, and often). It was possible to distinguish them only by accent, posture and behavior. All posts were bought on the folding legend and the look of terrorists.

But the police from Budyonnovsk "struck" terrorists. Everything was explained simply. In the regional center there was the largest market in the district, where Chechens were frequent guests. The Budennovsk militiamen studied their habits and anthropology features well and perfectly identified guests from the mountains visually. One of the policemen even knew a little Chechen language.

“Nohcha woo?” He asked one of the suspicious “contract soldiers”. He hesitated literally for a second. “I do not understand what you are carrying there!” He snapped. But the sergeant had already calculated it. And I realized that something was amiss here, and very much so. He detailed his suspicions to the authorities on the radio. The tragedy of the situation was that the leadership of the ROVD did not take the signal from the highway seriously enough. And ordered to just turn the column to the office - to clarify the situation. And paid a terrible price for it. That sergeant died - in a battle near the ROVD, the Chechens killed him first. But at the cost of his life, he broke plans for the bandits - their real purpose was the airport in Minvody. It is terrible to even imagine what they could have done there! And if the head of the ROVD reacted adequately and reported a suspicious convoy to the local FSB, and they, in turn, would also assess the whole danger of the situation, the picture would be different. By the way, formally the police chief had to do so. As he did in fact, we will never know.

Sad summary. If ALL of the sergeant who responded to the Chechen language had responded adequately, Satan, with all his fraternity, could be "locked up" in an open field, surrounded by troops and armored vehicles. There and leave. History, unfortunately, does not know the subjunctive mood. But can teach something.

The first to appreciate the benefits of language skills were the Vympel officers. And they included key, in their opinion, languages ​​in the curriculum. In Chechnya, GRU special forces quickly arrived at the same thought. They have not been without a tragic mistake on this basis. One of the officers, a former “Afghan”, knew Afghan Dari and Farsi quite well. Seeing among ethnic Afghan militants in Chechnya, he decided not to bother to learn key phrases in Chechen and during the next raid he was legendary as a mercenary from Afghanistan. He looked like he was in the water: during one of the raids in the rear, his group face to face, under Argun, the Khattab militants. The officer immediately went to the contact, talking in Afghan. But neither his language, nor his appearance (he was in the Afghan cape) did not mislead the bandits. It ended not very cool. The major did not take into account that the Afghan mercenaries always went with local translators and were the first to never get in touch. Still, it was necessary to learn the language of the enemy, and not rely on the knowledge of the enemy of yesterday.

Little of. Even in Afghanistan, it was necessary to know the language of the very people on whose land you are fighting. If you speak Uzbek with a stranger who, unfortunately, turns out to be a Tajik, Hazara or Pashtun, a bullet sent to your head can become a logical continuation of such a conversation.



"Sochi English"

Unfortunately, practice and personal experience have shown that the study of a foreign language for our professional intelligence officers and saboteurs is a pleasure “with a sickle in a delicate place, and with a sweep and with a delay”. "I have no inclination to learn the Chechen language," every fighter, who knew how to "shoot like a cowboy and run like his horse." It was easier for them to run a march on 10 kilometers, than to learn ten key words in Chechen. Then I gave up on this matter. And in vain.

After 15 years, before the Olympics in Sochi, I realized how wrong I was then. At one of the meetings in the local police department, the deputy chief for work with personnel showed me a master class in convincing subordinates (then we tried to teach them key “tourist” phrases of the English language). “I have no inclination to learn English”, - we were gloomily taldychil like the special forces soldiers, workers of the Sochi faculty, many of whom, by the way, passed Chechnya at one time. “Do you have a tendency to receive a salary?” - Colonel asked meekly and cunningly. - And to receive the award? So, I can deprive you of this inclination ... You understand me? "

It immediately turned out that the personnel entrusted to him was a complete “understand”. All as one began to cram English. Some - with the help of wives and children. Others began to hire tutors. A couple of weeks each of the students passed the language test. Lost almost everything. And after the Olympics, they unanimously claimed how English helped them then. After that, one of them really went to Interpol.

See the enemy - do not be afraid

After the battle near the village of Ulus-Kurt, the paratroopers found a memo in English on the body of a dead Arab militant. The staff translators quickly translated it into Russian. There were such lines:

“When you see the enemy, do not be afraid of him.
Because it is not a fact that he sees you.
If he sees you - not the fact that he is armed.
If he is armed, not the fact that his machine is charged.
If it is charged - not the fact that he will have time to shoot.
If he shoots, it’s not a fact that he hits you.
If you fall - not the fact that he hurt you.
If it hurts, it's not a fact that it will kill. Wounding can be easy.
So go ahead and do not be afraid. "

Personally, I admired this memo. I invited the officers to make this text a “chest reminder” for all the personnel fighting in Chechnya. Multistar officers did not hear me. Eternally busy, for some reason they were the last to think about the moral and psychological state of the fighters. I was heard only by the commander of the marines brigade. I used to like the bitterness with which the sailors fought in Chechnya. They fully justified their proud title of the “black death”. The Marinesman commander himself explained this with the specifics of the conduct of the war with the “black berets”: “You are attacking the enemy from the ship. Under your feet and behind your back is the sea (or ocean). Waves - your grave. You can go, swim, run only forward. The faster, the more likely to get away from the water depth. If you are destined to die, it is better from the bullet of the enemy than to become fish food. On the shore waiting for you another sea - a sea of ​​fire. If you want to survive and win - go with the enemy defenses. Your determination and your attack must be terrible. Throw the enemy without stopping. " Very good internal installation - I recommend to adopt, the marines will not be offended.



And they won. Or die. Chechens called them "polundra". During the two Chechen campaigns, not a single “half-ground” fighter surrendered to the militants (although they locked up in buildings and offered them to surrender militants quite often). The best trophy for the bandits was considered an automaton with a small pasted shark on the butt.

At night, along with the political officer in the dim light of the lantern on duty, several hundred such notes were written by hand for personnel. And in the morning they distributed to the sailors. The commander made every warrior read it several times. Some of the fighters (who had a bad memory) took the credit for knowing this memo personally.

I still quite sincerely consider this memo to be one of the best examples of ideological creativity in the war.

... When you find yourself in your war, do yourself the same. Write by hand and wear on your chest. And periodically re-read. Especially before the raid or before the fight. Or just remember - like a prayer.

Продолжение следует ...
Author:
56 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. then
    then 3 July 2018 05: 54
    +44
    With age, you begin to understand that the most important thing in life is death and the main thing is not to die a traitor.
    1. Vard
      Vard 3 July 2018 06: 01
      +18
      To betray someone ... Your family and friends ... Or the state .... Budenovsk would not exist ... If the police would have the right to open fire on their own ... As in all civilized countries .... If danger is detected. ..
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 3 July 2018 06: 11
        +41
        Quote: Vard
        As in all civilized countries ....

        Maybe enough about their "civilization" and "enlightenment"? Why, for some, do you really want to show Russia some kind of flawed, wild and barbaric?
        What is self-flagellation for?
        1. Snail N9
          Snail N9 3 July 2018 06: 43
          +37
          Most of all I am enraged by "couch moralists" who talk about some kind of "morality" in the war, they say Russian warriors, like special ones, they are "morally" fighting, but "foreign" .... There is no "morality" in the war, as soon as you thought about "morality" there, you're a corpse ...
        2. Vard
          Vard 3 July 2018 08: 16
          +12
          For a long time the civilized word became abusive ... I proceed from this ... But here, in the sense that in the same America the police would immediately open fire ... and we began to call up ... the result is known .. .
          1. RaptorF22
            RaptorF22 3 July 2018 09: 12
            +9
            This is Russia good They have self-defense allowed. good And we ourselves chose it good Stable state good
          2. Peter Ivanov
            Peter Ivanov 3 July 2018 17: 39
            +17
            “You” has a state of unarmed citizens, it does not have the institution of “possession of firearms” as in the West! From this and the norms of behavior in the Ministry of Internal Affairs are RESPONSIBLE!
            Do not flatter yourself! The armed people of the Russian Federation is Putin’s terrible dream!
            1. neri73-r
              neri73-r 3 July 2018 22: 31
              +8
              Quote: Peter Ivanov
              “You” has a state of unarmed citizens, it does not have the institution of “possession of firearms” as in the West! From this and the norms of behavior in the Ministry of Internal Affairs are RESPONSIBLE!
              Do not flatter yourself! The armed people of the Russian Federation is Putin’s terrible dream!

              Well, it depends on which side to look at, and the GDP has nothing to do with it! For example, I have 7 trunks of them three rifled! hi And if you are talking about a short-barreled gun (pistols) like that (armed people), then, firstly, do not mislead people by the fact that we are supposedly unarmed, and secondly, the short-barreled gun differs from long-barreled weapons only by the possibility of hidden carrying !!!! So explain why it (and the possibility of hidden wearing) is needed and how it will help our society ?! stop
              1. Peter Ivanov
                Peter Ivanov 3 July 2018 22: 56
                +13
                I didn’t want to, but I will answer!
                It’s hard for you to understand, apparently, that in the Russian Federation, like in the Union, the form of “unarmed people” is adopted = when you almost never meet an armed and ready-to-fire citizen, foreigner or stateless person in any place of the country, AND FOR LEGAL BASES ! But in the state of Texas, USE, the people achieved freedom to walk around the city with a pistol or revolver, as well as with a semi-automatic rifle! And therefore, the police in this country, as even in Germany or France, comes up to you with your hand on the handle of the barrel !!! And shoots at the slightest threat, true or imaginary !! You have never dreamed of such a thing, because in itself it is scary! But for those with weapons only at home or on / off, the authorities are not trying to explain these details! And rejoice that in the country the trunks are under the most severe control! I WILL NEVER FORGET THESE “TRILLS” AT THE BEGINNING OF 90 IN MOSCOW! AND DO NOT FORGIVE !!!
                I’ve been with a barrel all my life ... and I know the price of life well!
                1. neri73-r
                  neri73-r 3 July 2018 23: 38
                  +5
                  Quote: Pyotr Ivanov
                  the people achieved freedom to walk around the city with a pistol or revolver, as well as with a semi-automatic rifle! And therefore, the police in this country, as even in Germany or France, comes up to you with your hand on the handle of the barrel !!! And shoots at the slightest threat, true or imaginary !! You have never dreamed of such a thing, because in itself it is scary!

                  I hope in our country this will only be dreamed of in a nightmare and will NEVER be in reality !!!
                  Quote: Pyotr Ivanov
                  And rejoice that in the country the trunks are under the most severe control!

                  I sincerely rejoice! No jokes! For I saw and dragged, these shot, cut and dissected, many of which had a short barrel with them, more than a dozen! hi

                  It’s hard for you to understand, apparently, that in the Russian Federation, as well as in the Union, the form of “unarmed people” has been adopted
                  I think it’s no harder than you and I completely agree with this "form"! Yes
        3. RaptorF22
          RaptorF22 3 July 2018 09: 17
          +2
          Yes, finally fellow It's all a lie good We are fine good Stable quiet and smooth Egyptian good People are happy with laws. Everything is for people. good
      2. andrew42
        andrew42 3 July 2018 14: 12
        +5
        Hmm .. in our time, the term "civilized countries" has transformed into a drive "civilized." Especially in the modern Russian mentality., Especially in relation to countries deliberately bulging with their "civilization." The civilization of the descendants of the Inquisitors, Crusaders, pirates, mercenaries is not something to take an example from. As were the noisy "wandering circus" and remained. Troubadours and pickpockets - this essence of the "civilized" show has not changed for 1000 years.
      3. aws4
        aws4 3 July 2018 23: 38
        0
        wow the first article that I read and in which you did not have time to leave your comment first ... lose your grip laughing
      4. Areg babadjanyan
        Areg babadjanyan 6 July 2018 18: 58
        +1
        He betrayed the state, betrayed the family. Every nation has those rulers which it deserves. Live with it.
      5. philosopher
        philosopher 8 July 2018 06: 49
        0
        In one’s ignorance one does not have to try to enlighten others.
        A synonym for the term “civilization” in Russian is fencing, that is, the process of turning an armed militant population capable of standing up for itself in a peaceful and helpless one, which a professional army will have to defend.
        So the scenario, when "I shoot when I consider it necessary," certainly can not be called civilized.
    2. Baloo
      Baloo 3 July 2018 08: 24
      +8
      Quote: sedan
      With age, you begin to understand that the most important thing in life is death and the main thing is not to die a traitor.

      good drinks hi
      The most important thing in life is a family worthy of old age. Respect and respect for all those whose work for ordinary citizens is unknown and invisible. drinks Warrior all good luck, health and patience. drinks
      1. RaptorF22
        RaptorF22 3 July 2018 09: 14
        +2
        Right good And their early retirement good And then you are unhappy with the increase in retirement age good
      2. Mestny
        Mestny 3 July 2018 11: 44
        +2
        By the way, I recommend a look. The book of the daughter of Professor Kurganov is considered.
        It’s about the family there, for which the most important thing in life is herself, that is, the family.
        You can watch an example from 6 minutes, the video is long.
        But about the "most important" is told perfectly.
        1. Gepirion
          Gepirion 3 July 2018 12: 42
          +8
          On Egor (the author of the Tubus show program) signed a very long time. It makes very capacious videos, with analysis and debriefing. Unfortunately, watching his videos leaves much to be desired. Today, govnoblogery honored millions of views.
    3. Yrec
      Yrec 3 July 2018 15: 17
      +10
      There is such a song - sometimes there are no names left from the heroes of bygone days ... In war, you need to think and not make yourself a “hero”, for your name will not remain. There are, of course, exceptions, but they are single. Remember the term "mass heroism"? “Heroism” in war is usually the result of a mistake in command or your own. As a rule, he leads to the grave. At best, personal, at worst, fraternal. Death is the end of life, not its purpose. You need to live your life with dignity, and death will not pass anyone, neither the righteous nor the scum. You need to be proud of what you did in life, and not how you famously glued fins. This is my opinion.
  2. Separ DNR
    Separ DNR 3 July 2018 05: 58
    +11
    Unfortunately, practice and personal experience have shown that learning a foreign language for our professional scouts and saboteurs is a level of pleasure "with a sickle in a tender place, and with a wide scope and a delay."

    But with this, everything is simple with us. Almost everyone, starting from the second grade of OS (in the Soviet period), studied Ukrainian ...
    Not everyone, of course, taught him diligently, but there will be no linguistic abyss, if necessary ...
    1. kvs207
      kvs207 3 July 2018 06: 51
      +7
      Ukrainian, still close to Russian. It is more difficult to learn mountain languages. When I served as an emergency, for the first time I heard one of the Dagestan languages ​​and was horrified, it is so “peculiar” and difficult to reproduce, but Ukrainian did not cause any special problems.
      1. Moisey19631
        3 July 2018 12: 10
        +5
        No need to learn the whole language. Need to learn key phrases.
  3. Pravodel
    Pravodel 3 July 2018 06: 59
    +7
    Great memo for every fighter
  4. Shiva83483
    Shiva83483 3 July 2018 07: 02
    +10
    I had a poster on an emergency, on the parade ground above the podium, Any task, anywhere, anytime, by any means ... as for me, a pretty good psychological daily pump for soldiers, over a quarter passed, and I remember how "Our Father "....
    1. Lycan
      Lycan 3 July 2018 10: 11
      +5
      Quote: Shiva83483
      Any task, anywhere, anytime, by any means

      Strange, but on a citizen, in spite of this very robust slogan, some sort of leapfrog occurs, namely, you tear the veins so that quality and on time - and for the hundredth time - no one needs this result. Chesslovo. One hundredth! Maybe this only works in the service?!?!?!?
      Some kind of magic .........
      1. Moisey19631
        3 July 2018 12: 09
        +4
        A citizen lives by other laws.
  5. parusnik
    parusnik 3 July 2018 07: 47
    +11
    Good topic. Thank you. We look forward to continuing.
    1. Moisey19631
      3 July 2018 12: 08
      +3
      Will be. The most interesting is ahead.
  6. Conductor
    Conductor 3 July 2018 09: 18
    0
    Hmm, war and morality
  7. Cheldon
    Cheldon 3 July 2018 09: 28
    +8
    Andrei Zagortsev "City": - No luck, the headlights lit us and a truck appeared. In a couple of seconds, they will notice us. Everyone sailed. The thought flashed and went out, I did not even have time to recognize it, as in a half-voice hissed, yelled, breaking into a screech.

    - Cauldron on the side of the road. On the side of the road to the house, come on.

    The cauldron shook his head crazy, turned right and ran to the blank concrete wall of the house. I deliberately chose such a place for running so that the wall was blank, and we would not be visible from the windows. I ran to Kotelsky, deployed the Hedgehog puffing behind me.

    - Squat down, light a cigarette faster and be silent.

    After a couple of seconds, we fell into the headlights of a wretched dirty ZIL. On the move, the door opened and they shouted something to us.

    “Vaaz,” I yelled at random and waved my hand toward the bridge.

    “Allah Akbaaaaar,” they shouted at us from the back, our heart sank at the heels, now we are being hit in three seconds. And here my fighters, either on a hunch from above, or from arrogance, yelled in response:

    “Allaaaa Akbar,” they raised their hands in a fascist gesture.

    The body was quite neighing and ZIL was out of sight. My heart pounded. Carried. "(Quote from the book)
    The protagonist lived in Grozny for some time, and this saved the DRG.
  8. Munchhausen
    Munchhausen 3 July 2018 10: 27
    +1
    Peace spending will not work, someone will still start shooting. In my opinion, to prevent the unexpected, there is intelligence.
  9. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 3 July 2018 11: 11
    +7
    If anyone is really interested, see this ..

    There are several videos with this very sensible instructor.
    1. Moisey19631
      3 July 2018 12: 07
      +2
      Video sensible. And very famous in narrow circles. But the article was not about this.
    2. Mikhail Matyugin
      Mikhail Matyugin 4 July 2018 22: 43
      +1
      Quote: Razvedka_Boem
      There are several videos with this very sensible instructor

      Respect, comrade! Very cool briefing, the first time I meet such an adequacy!
  10. Blue fox
    Blue fox 3 July 2018 11: 19
    +8
    The article probably has a place to be, however:
    1. We were taught that if there was mutual visual contact with the "enemy", then it was necessary to leave the line of his fire and immediately open fire, in any case. And then it’s the enemy or another group of his own who will sort it out.
    2. The GPZ was instructed, in the event of an ambush or sudden oncoming contact, to start the battle and hold on to the last, and depending on the situation, the group commander decided to support the GPZ or withdraw. Therefore, the gas processing plant always went without a load, but with a maximum BC.
    3. I will not speak for everyone, but a couple of phrases in the local dialect were known by all the fighters right up to the last "eternal worm" who did not crawl out of the outfits in the RPD. I vaguely imagine how you can say hello to the enemy in a sudden meeting in the forest and what good will come of it. After all, the enemy acted similarly to our actions in paragraph 1.
    However, I agree that knowledge of specific commands such as: “Attention!”, “Stop!”, “Top”, “Down”, “Left”, “Right”, etc. definitely helpful.
    4. Motivation ... I won’t say anything, in our units, operating away from the main forces there was no such problem at all, more attention was paid to psychological stability and readiness to adequately respond to a sudden threat, and only constant training can help with this, including shelling with live ammunition and detonation of live grenades near (of course, there was nothing like that :), and not a memo.
    1. Moisey19631
      3 July 2018 11: 26
      0
      so can a friendly fire perish ...
      1. Moisey19631
        3 July 2018 11: 31
        +7
        Mind you problems may not have been. Other problems had a great deal. POW bill went to hundreds. The Novosibirsk riot police under Pervomayka surrendered in full force. After a hard fire contact in Zhani-led, 16 fighters from the Perm OMON surrendered. And not a single Marine.
        1. Moisey19631
          3 July 2018 11: 34
          +4
          About the meeting and the benefits of "zdorovka" you imagine vaguely. Others are more than distinctly. Only we must not "zdorovatsya", and speak the correct phrase. Read the article carefully. It says about it.
      2. Blue fox
        Blue fox 3 July 2018 12: 14
        +1
        Read my comment, the letters “the enemy” are written in quotation marks, that is, conditionally. Naturally, no one would shoot at suddenly appeared people unbuttoned to the belly, merrily pulling a can of water under their swear, identifying them with the enemy.
        In addition, every group working away from the main forces was instructed on the availability of other groups and forces, and the commander and radio operator had a more accurate idea of ​​their area of ​​operations, callsigns and frequencies, this is the ABC.
        As for friendly fire, there is so much that can be done in war.
        1. Moisey19631
          3 July 2018 14: 23
          +1
          In Chechnya, this alphabet was limping on both legs all the time.
          1. Moisey19631
            3 July 2018 14: 24
            +1
            and in Georgia (and often in Chechnya), many groups had to work in the radio silence mode.
            1. Moisey19631
              3 July 2018 14: 25
              +1
              You seem. ideological charter. That is why ideological often lost creatively-minded terrorists.
    2. Mikhail Matyugin
      Mikhail Matyugin 4 July 2018 22: 48
      0
      Quote: Blue Fox
      1. We were taught that if there was mutual visual contact with the "enemy", then it was necessary to leave the line of his fire and immediately open fire, in any case. And then it’s the enemy or another group of his own who will sort it out.
      2. The GPZ was instructed, in the event of an ambush or sudden oncoming contact, to start the battle and hold on to the last, and depending on the situation, the group commander decided to support the GPZ or withdraw. Therefore, the gas processing plant always went without a load, but with a maximum BC.

      Well, if the item 1 is still controversial, although it makes sense - but apparently because the losses from friendly fire were so great, then the item 2 - very true - the head watch is always with enhanced ammunition and without load, that's for sure.
  11. Altona
    Altona 3 July 2018 12: 10
    +7
    Quote: Snail N9
    Most of all I am enraged by "couch moralists" who talk about some kind of "morality" in the war, they say Russian warriors, like special ones, they are "morally" fighting, but "foreign" .... There is no "morality" in the war, as soon as you thought about "morality" there, you're a corpse ...

    -------------------------------
    There’s no time to even think about it. These "human rights activists" then let out tears about the "tear of a child", but for some reason, the death of Tanya Savicheva in besieged Leningrad does not touch them in the least, like the dead children of Donetsk and Lugansk.
  12. Blue fox
    Blue fox 3 July 2018 12: 16
    0
    Quote: Moisey19631
    Mind you problems may not have been. Other problems had a great deal. POW bill went to hundreds. The Novosibirsk riot police under Pervomayka surrendered in full force. After a hard fire contact in Zhani-led, 16 fighters from the Perm OMON surrendered. And not a single Marine.

    I wonder how this memo would help the fighters? The state’s concern for the servants, public support, normal information and provision would do more.
    1. Moisey19631
      3 July 2018 14: 21
      +5
      Do not distort. The article deals only with the war. And about the behavior of the war in a particular situation. There is a concept in the army - politmorsos (if you served decipher)). That's about him. Memo - the same series, to the soul to fight was undermined. And not about pensions, etc. This is from another opera.
  13. Blue fox
    Blue fox 3 July 2018 12: 18
    0
    Quote: Moisey19631
    About the meeting and the benefits of "zdorovka" you imagine vaguely. Others are more than distinctly. Only we must not "zdorovatsya", and speak the correct phrase. Read the article carefully. It says about it.

    That's right, the right phrases that you still need to know. Historically, they are called “password” and “revocation”. Or just a conditional word, sound or even a gesture. All this is used by us and them.
    1. Moisey19631
      3 July 2018 14: 22
      0
      Sudden contact may not be exhausted by these concepts.
  14. andrew42
    andrew42 3 July 2018 14: 18
    +5
    It is strange that there are some counter discussions on the article. The language of the enemy and the local population must be known at all times. The bigger, the better. What alternatives can there be?
  15. Peter Ivanov
    Peter Ivanov 3 July 2018 17: 25
    +3
    The late Hobotoff correctly spoke: "- God! What fantasies?" Yes, and behind enemy lines, especially bribed city-man-x-ray ... it is a pity that he was the only one in the whole of Russia!
    I would not write if "the squirrel did not drive" myself!
  16. serge siberian
    serge siberian 3 July 2018 20: 26
    0
    Someone said, “Knowing the language of a likely opponent is already a prerequisite for victory, and knowing his language l / s at least partially is a breakthrough” negative hi
  17. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 3 July 2018 21: 21
    +6
    Quote: Snail N9
    Most of all I am enraged by "couch moralists" who talk about some kind of "morality" in the war, they say Russian warriors, like special ones, they are "morally" fighting, but "foreign" .... There is no "morality" in the war, as soon as you thought about "morality" there, you're a corpse ...

    Oh, what a categorical American horseman! Most infuriating his Internet users ... the most dangerous moralists!
    Do not hit the hoof with a disease.
    Forgot the whale, how many officers were in prison because of moralists with big stars? Sitting in the office and often giving criminal orders, these star-dumb moralists know exactly what it’s moral for a soldier to do before his death, and for what it is necessary to punish. If, not even an hour, will survive.
    Not Internet users are to blame, but really mean, empty-headed Pasha Mercedes and the like scum.
  18. capitosha1rang
    capitosha1rang 4 July 2018 15: 10
    +2
    Interesting material, but applied to today - a shot in milk.
    The wonderful guys I talk to every day, up to the captain, major inclusive, rarely - lieutenant colonel, who understand everything in the war and completely do not understand their commanders, especially from the districts, angry and ready for anything.
    Okay, Rokhlin was killed, someone else will be killed, but will it come to understand that the Russian Army is the Russian army and what does it do, say, in Syria, which already has Four Army CPAs assigned to the budget?
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 5 July 2018 23: 01
    +2
    . “You will see the enemy - do not be afraid of him.
    Because it is not a fact that he sees you.
    If he sees you - not the fact that he is armed.
    If he is armed, not the fact that his machine is charged.
    If it is charged - not the fact that he will have time to shoot.
    If he shoots, it’s not a fact that he hits you.
    If you fall - not the fact that he hurt you.
    If it hurts, it's not a fact that it will kill. Wounding can be easy.
    So go ahead and do not be afraid. "

    We called it easier: do not "write in your pants" ahead of time. (I’m not sure that censorship will allow colloquial expressions that mean the body’s natural functions) therefore I brought in a child’s analogue of the famous saying laughing
    1. Moisey19631
      8 July 2018 22: 36
      +1
      It is also an option.