Putin spoke about the withdrawal of Russian troops from Syria

Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting with graduates of higher military educational institutions in the Kremlin told how the process of the withdrawal of Russian troops from Syria is going on, RIA News.

According to the head of state, over the past few days, 14 helicopters, 13 aircraft and more than 1100 military personnel left the territory of the Arab state.

He noted that all these people have experience and have been tested in combat.

Now this experience will have to be fully utilized by current graduates “for combat training of personnel here in Russia for working out the most difficult non-standard tasks,” Putin said.

According to him, in recent years, much has been done to develop the armed forces. Its qualitatively increased potential units of the Russian army clearly demonstrated in the fight against terrorism in Syria, the president added.

800 graduates from educational institutions of the Ministry of Defense, the Federal Security Service, the Federal Security Service, the Federal Guard Service, the Emergencies Ministry, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia were invited to the Kremlin.

Recall the armed conflict in the Syrian Arab Republic began in March 2011. Russia launched an operation against the terrorist group IG (banned in the Russian Federation) in September 2015, at the request of the official Damascus.

Earlier on Thursday "Military Review" reported about the return of the attack helicopter Ka-52 "Alligator" from Syria, which was delivered to Russia by IL-76 transport aircraft.

Comments

[Andrey K]

... over the past few days, 14 helicopters, 13 aircraft and more than 1100 military personnel left the territory of the Arab state ...

The Syrians cleared the clearing, it's time to relax.
Experience is the most valuable thing that could give us participation in the suppression of the terrorist infection in Syria.
Now it’s the turn to introduce the blood and then the knowledge gained into the combat training of the troops.

[hrych]

Quote: Andrey K

Now it’s the turn to introduce the blood and then the knowledge gained into the combat training of the troops.

I would say that it’s time to introduce experience on banderlogs ...

[Andrey K]

Quote: hrych

... I would say that it’s time to introduce experience on banderlogs ...

Our home-grown banderlogs, the most combed banderlogs in the world (pah-pah, so as not to jinx it).
We have special services of the local shaitans - the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
I talked about the combat training of the troops — the combat coordination of artillerymen, aviation, artillery and aircraft guides, the use of UAVs, rear logistics personnel with their logistics — which we have problems with, remember the Syrian Express.

[hrych]

I'm about Bandera so

[Andrey K]

Quote: hrych

... I'm about Bandera so ...

My cant, I did not understand right away
I agree with you - the brown plague processing methodology, taking into account the experience gained, must also be improved

[210ox]

Yes, it would be nice to close the Ruins theme. Once and for all ...

Quote: hrych

Quote: Andrey K

Now it’s the turn to introduce the blood and then the knowledge gained into the combat training of the troops.

I would say that it’s time to introduce experience on banderlogs ...

[MPN]

We will see after meeting with Trump, the option that we bring back and the option still bring ...

[Maz]

And about pensions, gas prices, the ruble and oil exchange did not want to tell?

[Muvka]

Graduates of military institutions? Seriously? You don’t confuse him with Petya, who speaks about the occupation of Donbass at any opening in the country, that it’s expensive, that a tunnel, that even speaks to kindergarteners ...

[AVA77]

For pensions, gas prices, the ruble and oil, see the Moscow ear forum.

[viktor.]

And you call and find out, so to speak firsthand.

[Fungus]

Leave a minimum of people to support the bases and will be normal

[lis-ik]

Well done Putin. his full time is serving, even with the graduates of the schools he took the time to meet, what else is everything okay, the championship is on, there is no murmur, oil and gas are pumping, what else is needed? Forgot comrades also in chocolate.

[Svarog]

Quote: lis-ik

Well done Putin. his full time is serving, even with the graduates of the schools he took the time to meet, what else is everything okay, the championship is on, there is no murmur, oil and gas are pumping, what else is needed? Forgot comrades also in chocolate.

I wonder how it will be explained to pensioners that they decided to leave without pensions? They will probably show a picture where future pensioners, in tears of happiness, thank the guarantor for the fact that they can be considered young for another 8 years. But Putin will make a modest appearance, pat a pensioner on the shoulder, wipe away a tear, remember his parents and wish - “money will be in 8 years, but you hold on” It's time to devote 80% of your time to internal affairs! Including in the media

[lis-ik]

Quote: Svarog

Quote: lis-ik

Well done Putin. his full time is serving, even with the graduates of the schools he took the time to meet, what else is everything okay, the championship is on, there is no murmur, oil and gas are pumping, what else is needed? Forgot comrades also in chocolate.

I wonder how it will be explained to pensioners that they decided to leave without pensions? They will probably show a picture where future pensioners, in tears of happiness, thank the guarantor for the fact that they can be considered young for another 8 years. And Putin will make a modest appearance, pat a pensioner on the shoulder, wipe away a tear, remember his parents and wish - "money will be in 8 years, but you hold on"

Well, nafig, according to the latest data, I’m still a young man, and I hasten to apply my talent, though I have not yet decided which of the most prestigious universities of the capital will take my documents in 50 full years, but I will definitely decide, because all life is ahead!

[Leshy1975]

Quote: lis-ik

Well, nafig, according to the latest data, I’m still a young man, and I hasten to apply my talent, though I have not yet decided which of the most prestigious universities of the capital will take my documents in 50 full years, but I will definitely decide, because all life is ahead!

from the Zhmurki movie: A sense of humor is good. With a sense of humor, dying is easier.

[The_X_Factor]

Well, since you can’t work already in 50 years, then what difference does it make for you to receive 10k handouts in 60 years or 65 (and this is only from 2028 and only if the reform is adopted in this form), or even 85 You could still add a thread in the spirit of "but still not live up to retirement."

[Razvedka_Boem]

I wonder how it will be explained to pensioners that they decided to leave without pensions? They will probably show a picture where future pensioners, in tears of happiness, thank the guarantor for the fact that they can be considered young for another 8 years. And Putin will make a modest appearance, pat a pensioner on the shoulder, wipe away a tear, remember his parents and wish - "money will be in 8 years, but you hold on"

What does the GDP have to do with it?
This law has not yet been adopted; it will still be brought to mind.
GDP does not participate in its development.
But he comments everything as if he himself wrote this law of GDP, he himself accepted it and now it is extreme for what it did not exist and for what it did not do.

[210ox]

No, he doesn’t accept. It’s not his business ... He will join in when public opinion is prepared, maybe he will help a few unfortunate people who have broken into a straight line and will be in chocolate as always. He has nothing to do with bad boyars.

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

I wonder how it will be explained to pensioners that they decided to leave without pensions? They will probably show a picture where future pensioners, in tears of happiness, thank the guarantor for the fact that they can be considered young for another 8 years. And Putin will make a modest appearance, pat a pensioner on the shoulder, wipe away a tear, remember his parents and wish - "money will be in 8 years, but you hold on"

What does the GDP have to do with it?
This law has not yet been adopted; it will still be brought to mind.
GDP does not participate in its development.
But he comments everything as if he himself wrote this law of GDP, he himself accepted it and now it is extreme for what it did not exist and for what it did not do.

[MstislavHrabr]

Neh bring it! And those who proposed it must be!

[Leshy1975]

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

I wonder how it will be explained to pensioners that they decided to leave without pensions? They will probably show a picture where future pensioners, in tears of happiness, thank the guarantor for the fact that they can be considered young for another 8 years. And Putin will make a modest appearance, pat a pensioner on the shoulder, wipe away a tear, remember his parents and wish - "money will be in 8 years, but you hold on"

What does the GDP have to do with it?
This law has not yet been adopted; it will still be brought to mind.
GDP does not participate in its development.
But he comments everything as if he himself wrote this law of GDP, he himself accepted it and now it is extreme for what it did not exist and for what it did not do.

I, too, the farther, the more perplexed: "What does the GDP have to do with it?" Yes, tell me already someone, but are there any such important questions in our country that the GDP would have anything to do with it? And if there are none, and he has nothing to do with it all the time, then maybe on his fix, can we do without it? Since nothing depends on him anyway. Except it on TV. show, we definitely need it for something else? All the same, it doesn’t turn out to be.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Leshy1975

I, too, the farther, the more perplexed ...

You have problems understanding what they write to you. Reread comrade's comment Razvedka_Boem. And again, and again ... until it reaches.
Everything is written there, as for a child in a primer - for sure, simply and clearly.
President deals tonly with the law already adopted by the Duma and approved by the Federation Council. Here at this stage he can intervene in the process. And not before.
While there is no such law - the role of the President is a pure observer.
So - more understandable?

[Leshy1975]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: Leshy1975

I, too, the farther, the more perplexed ...

You have problems understanding what they write to you. Reread comrade's comment Razvedka_Boem. And again, and again ... until it reaches.
Everything is written there, as for a child in a primer - for sure, simply and clearly.
President deals tonly with the law already adopted by the Duma and approved by the Federation Council. Here at this stage he can intervene in the process. And not before.
While there is no such law - the role of the President is a pure observer.
So - more understandable?

The internal policy of Russia is the activity of the state, its structures and institutions, aimed at maintaining or reforming the existing socio-political system, modernizing the political system, developing the economy and solving social problems.
Russia's domestic policy covers all spheres of society (political, economic, social, cultural) and includes many areas: business, energy, natural resources, finance and taxes, the armed forces, law enforcement, education, healthcare, social security, demographic situation , national construction, etc.
According to the Constitution of Russia (Article 80 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation), the President of the Russian Federation determines the main directions of the state’s internal policy. The President addresses the Federal Assembly with annual messages on the situation in the country and on the main directions of the state’s internal policy. To help the President in pursuing domestic policy, the Head of State created the Council of State - an institution that carries out advisory functions.
Roman, from the fact that you read the mechanism of adoption of the law and everywhere you poke it, you think you look too smart? For you specifically again:
"According to the Constitution of Russia, the President of the Russian Federation determines the main directions of the state’s internal policy." So go elsewhere and tell that the cart should be in front of the horse. Further you are not interesting to me. Everything is Roman, free.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Leshy1975

... from what you read ...

I'm with you you didn’t drink the brudershaft. And not going to yet. Therefore - if you please

Quote: Leshy1975

... free ...

Yes, I’m just not too busy right now, therefore: the fact that you read (or copied from somewhere) a couple of articles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation doesn’t completely cancel the existence of the Law (direct action, google what this means, it’s good for you) that regulates the order adoption of laws in the Russian Federation,
И because your whole speech is about nothing... and for some reason I'm not surprised, that's strange, right?

[Leshy1975]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: Leshy1975

... from what you read ...

I'm with you you didn’t drink the brudershaft. And not going to yet. Therefore - if you please

Quote: Leshy1975

... free ...

Yes, I’m just not too busy right now, therefore: the fact that you read (or copied from somewhere) a couple of articles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation doesn’t completely cancel the existence of the Law (direct action, google what this means, it’s good for you) that regulates the order adoption of laws in the Russian Federation,
И because your whole speech is about nothing... and for some reason I'm not surprised, that's strange, right?

Explain to yourself, mine: “According to the Constitution of Russia, the President of the Russian Federation defines the main directions of the state’s internal policy” and your work: “So far there is no such law - the role of the President is a pure observer.”
What is primary? When does he determine domestic politics? At that moment, only when the paper waved or not? This concerns the essence of the question of whether GDP is related to pension reform. And since you yourself are too lazy to google about the law of direct action: The direct effect of the law suggests that it has a direct impact on social relations regulated by it. It also means that citizens can invoke the norms of such a law in court. An example of a law with direct force may be the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Come on, keep putting the cart in front of the horse (in your opinion, first the law, and then the definition of domestic policy is obtained). Although it is not necessary to be semi-conscious in order to understand that, FIRST, the president determines the direction of domestic policy (and therefore bears responsibility) and then laws are developed and adopted (well or not) in accordance with this. Therefore, such emoticons you can set yourself.

[The_X_Factor]

Omg ... this is the case. Putin said - to find grandmas for the implementation of decrees. The government is looking for these grandmas. One option is to gradually raise the retirement age. Here is the definition of domestic policy. But! For this, specifically this reform to take place, you must first approve the parliament, then it gets to the president. And here he already either signs, that is, he specifically agrees with this option, or does not sign.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Leshy1975

FIRST, the president determines the direction of domestic policy (and therefore is responsible) and then, in accordance with this, laws are developed and adopted (well or not)

But in this phrase of yours, oddly enough, everything is correct. From her and push off:
- adopted laws should not contradict the Constitution
- The law on raising the retirement age of the Constitution does not contradict
- the direction defined by the President sets only the general vector of this ... lawmaking
- the Government fills with specifics this "vector" (in this case, the "economic bloc." Medvedevsky)
- therefore, the fact that so far everything is going through ... one place does not mean at all that Putin is responsible for this.
The law adopted and approved by the Federation Council will reach Putin - we will look at:
- in what form the Law will be adopted (if at all, it’s too painful ... ambiguous )
- actions of the President regarding this Law.
In the meantime, all your cries - no - but - what.
I am pleased to repeat the emoticon you like so much, it suits you, IMHO:

[Leshy1975]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: Leshy1975

FIRST, the president determines the direction of domestic policy (and therefore is responsible) and then, in accordance with this, laws are developed and adopted (well or not)

But in this phrase of yours, oddly enough, everything is correct. From her and push off:
- adopted laws should not contradict the Constitution
- The law on raising the retirement age of the Constitution does not contradict
- the direction defined by the President sets only the general vector of this ... lawmaking
- the Government fills with specifics this "vector" (in this case, the "economic bloc." Medvedevsky)
- therefore, the fact that so far everything is going through ... one place does not mean at all that Putin is responsible for this.
The law adopted and approved by the Federation Council will reach Putin - we will look at:
- in what form the Law will be adopted (if at all, it’s too painful ... ambiguous )
- actions of the President regarding this Law.
In the meantime, all your cries - no - but - what.
I am pleased to repeat the emoticon you like so much, it suits you, IMHO:

So, with the message "FIRST, the president determines the direction of domestic politics," as I understand it, agreed? I remind you the direction of such a policy (pension age, VAT, yes, and fuel prices, too). Move on.
Then yours - the "specifics this" vector "fills precisely with the Government (in this case, the" economic bloc. "Medvedevsky)"
Well, here: the President is empowered to determine the composition and procedure of the Government. As the head of state, the President has the right to chair the meetings of the Government, give instructions To the government and federal executive bodies. Therefore, you can continue to tell tales about the "economic block". Medvedevsky
Again yours "- so the fact that so far everything goes through ... one place does not mean at all that Putin is responsible for this."
Personally, it’s violet to me (I think the majority, too), all this happens with the active action of the president or his complete without action. He has set the vector of domestic policy, he has the authority to adjust the course now. So my opinion, it is he who bears, precisely the responsibility, precisely for the given course of domestic policy.
And now repeat your favorite "While there is no such law - the role of the President is a pure observer."

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Leshy1975

with the message "FIRST, the president determines the direction of domestic policy," as I understand it, agreed?

It is hard to argue with the obvious. I did not argue with this. Originally

Quote: Leshy1975

I remind you the direction of such a policy (pension age, VAT, yes, and fuel prices, too)

Rave. Directions never contain such detail.

Quote: Leshy1975

tales about the "economic block". Medvedevsky

This, unfortunately, is not a fairy tale. As soon as you understand this, your picture of the world will become ... slimmer, I will say so.

Quote: Leshy1975

So my opinion, it is he who bears, precisely the responsibility, precisely for a given course of domestic policy

I repeat - this is not a "course", this is one of the options for implementing this "course".
Okay. You are understood. Forced to state that for some reason even simple things do not reach you at all, or reach through ... ogroinny labor.
I have no more time for your enlightenment and upbringing - work, the end of the month ... a madhouse on wheels, in short.
Shine on

[tomket]

Quote: Golovan Jack

The president deals only with the law already adopted by the Duma and approved by the SovFed. Here at this stage he can intervene in the process. And not before.
While there is no such law, the role of the President is a pure observer.

When the government raises the pitchfork, will it also be watching outside? I'm afraid then it will be too late to intervene.

[Razvedka_Boem]

When the government raises the pitchfork

Not "when," but "if." Otherwise, incitement to overthrow the constitutional authority is obtained.

will he also be watching from the side?

It will not, for this the National Guard was created.

[MstislavHrabr]

But doesn’t it seem to you that it’s enough, simply, to express your opinion. I do not support they say that this idea of ​​raising the retirement age ... and that’s it ... There will be no law. And the people would know that the president is OUR! And now - this is the president of "THEM" ...

[Svarog]

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

I wonder how it will be explained to pensioners that they decided to leave without pensions? They will probably show a picture where future pensioners, in tears of happiness, thank the guarantor for the fact that they can be considered young for another 8 years. And Putin will make a modest appearance, pat a pensioner on the shoulder, wipe away a tear, remember his parents and wish - "money will be in 8 years, but you hold on"

What does the GDP have to do with it?
This law has not yet been adopted; it will still be brought to mind.
GDP does not participate in its development.
But he comments everything as if he himself wrote this law of GDP, he himself accepted it and now it is extreme for what it did not exist and for what it did not do.

Here you are naive .. if Putin were against it, no one would have lifted a finger and public opinion would not have been prepared for this ..

[Razvedka_Boem]

if Putin were against

Russia is not a monarchy, and any president, if, say, the case is not in Africa, is quite limited in his capabilities.
If the GDP did everything it wanted and the way he wanted it, I think it is quite possible to repeat 1993. It is unlikely that you would like to ..
Therefore, the GDP maneuvers between the interests of various groups, trying not to rock the ship called Russia. After all, the GDP team does not say that it is especially large, as always the issue of personnel is very acute.
Let's wait for the fall, let's see in what form this law will be adopted and whether it will be adopted at all.

[Svarog]

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

Russia is not a monarchy, and any president, if, say, the case is not in Africa, is quite limited in his capabilities.

Yes, in Russia it’s neither a monarchy nor democracy and socialism, it’s not at all clear that small-town feudalism is probably a close definition of the state system ..

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

If the GDP did everything it wanted and the way he wanted it, I think the repetition of 1993 is quite possible. It is unlikely that you would like it.

VVP does what he wants, when necessary .. took and rewrote the constitution, again, when he needed it.

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

Therefore, the GDP maneuvers between the interests of various groups, trying not to rock the ship called Russia. After all, the GDP team does not say that it is especially large, as always the issue of personnel is very acute.

This is complete nonsense, the groups that did not suit him, he eliminated in the 2000s, and now leads them .. Judge for yourself, is it really not possible for 20 years to cope with any groups? With such opportunities .. do not be naive ..

[123456789]

Quote: lis-ik

Well done Putin. fully serving his term

From call to ring

[cost]

and Russia is withdrawing troops home, and the IG to Jordan .... set an example to the rest. We are waiting for the same from Turkey and the United States

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Rich

and Russia is withdrawing troops home, and the IG to Jordan .... set an example to the rest. We are waiting for the same from Turkey and the United States

... wait ... ... wait ... ... wait ... "20 years have passed" - ... wait ... ... wait ... ... wait ...

[askort154]

As in sports - leave on time.

[flicker]

We give a full carte blanche to Iran in Syria, apparently, some people do not keep the word. It will be less tempting to bomb Iran: they say, we will bomb Iran, and it is far from us - Iran will not be far away, it will be near.

[Misha Honest]

Quote: flicker

We give a full carte blanche to Iran in Syria, apparently, some people do not keep the word. It will be less tempting to bomb Iran: they say, we will bomb Iran, and it is far from us - Iran will not be far away, it will be near.

Rather, we give a full carte blanche to pin dosam and Israel ...

[Alexander Romanov]

Input-output, input-output, input-output

[hrych]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Input-output, input-output, input-output

[kebeskin]

Somewhere I already heard about the withdrawal of troops. Or is it like the last Chinese warning.

[I am Russian]

A unilateral deflection before meeting with Trump?

[Vadim237]

The Syrian troops and the Air Force themselves will cope, the supply of equipment to them continues.

[askort154]

I am Russian....Death unilaterally before meeting with Trump?


Why immediately - "deflection". Rather, it is a trump card. ISIS is virtually destroyed (even at the request of Trump). We, invited by Syria, are leaving, but what is the United States doing there ?! On what basis? This is a significant issue in the negotiations with Trump on Syria. By the way, they also withdraw their carrier group from the Mediterranean Sea.

[YarSer88]

Quote: askort154

On what basis?

By right of the strong, but what?

[I am Russian]

By the way, they also withdraw their carrier group from the Mediterranean Sea.

what `s next? this is not equivalent, it is not even a reason for discussion.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: I'm Russian

A unilateral deflection before meeting with Trump?

Whatever and no matter how the meeting between Trump and Putin ends, I give 100%, your comment will be something like this. -Trump Putin did, it was a pity to look at Putin. Putin leaked on all positions

[I am Russian]

Sanya, would you go from here, huh? go wangui somewhere else.

[loki565]

The US carrier group left the Mediterranean Sea, so that mutual curtsy)))

[KVU-NSVD]

In my opinion, Russia is taking significant steps in Syria. And if they don’t appreciate it, then the equipment will return .. The current Russian army is easy to climb ..

[sergei28]

Planned rotation and repair of equipment. Plus a meeting with Trump.

[Laksamana besar]

Rotation ..?

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Laksamana Besar

Rotation ..?

Yes Yes. This is exactly what you thought.

[123456789]

Putin spoke about the withdrawal of Russian troops from Syria

Afghanistan recalls however!
History is not a teacher, but a supervisor: she does not teach anything, but only punishes her for not knowing the lessons.

[72jora72]

Afghanistan recalls however!

Which regiment served?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: 72jora72

Which regiment served?

145 armored

[rpuropuu]

Quote: I am Russian

A unilateral deflection before meeting with Trump?

Why bend in front of your own agent? Danila knows his job, perfectly "staggers" NATO and the EU Most likely, the GDP will give new instructions on how to effectively impose “exceptional” export duties on goods

[parusnik]

Just before the meeting with D. Trump ... There are no Russian troops in Syria ... The Syrian people are fighting with US mercenaries .. It’s not a bad move and I think there’s still left ...

[clown]

That introduces, then outputs .. All of a sudden, all this. No matter how Iran began to bomb.

[Apollo]

This is stupid, Putin is again cunning. We got into it deeply and for a long time. And the fact that he declares this is a planned rotation. Leave the Russian units from Syria, there in a month everything will return to the level of 2014.

[16112014nk]

We introduce and deduce
input and output.
Great output!

[Vadim237]

You do not participate in these inputs and conclusions at all - you can not be ironic.

[cat Baiyun.]

Quote: 16112014nk

We introduce and deduce
input and output.
Great output!

Do not talk nonsense !!!

[cat Baiyun.]

The bulk of the military will be withdrawn, and this is good, evidence of that. that we (Russia) have fulfilled our task, but military advisers will remain instructors, and rightly so !!!

[Archivist Vasya]

And what is it, unless Putin lied to something - yes, the troops were withdrawn. And others have replaced them. Well, he didn’t say the truth about it ... Surprise

[Altona]

Quote: KVU-NSVD

In my opinion, Russia is taking significant steps in Syria. And if they don’t appreciate it, then the equipment will return .. The current Russian army is easy to climb ..

------------------
Yes, the king has played enough in the war, it is not needed yet. Will be needed, will again increase the grouping.

[Altona]

Quote: Razvedka_Boem

What does the GDP have to do with it?
This law has not yet been adopted; it will still be brought to mind.
GDP does not participate in its development.

-----------------------
The Martians sent the government, they set the GDP before the fact. This is how you gave birth to children and do not take part in their upbringing, you are not responsible for their actions. They offended a girl or an old woman, you are on the sidelines.

[Andrey VOV]

I was not too lazy to read all the comments .... half as lousy about the bathhouse, about pensions, the second half was leaked .... did you read the article ???? a drop is drawn into the sea, how did you get the sofa experts, did anyone shoot from you? killed the enemy? do you know how to wind foot wraps? Have you ever done something real in your life, built? or just sit on the keys hollow, woodpeckers

[Leshy1975]

Golovan Jack,

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: Leshy1975 I recall the direction of such a policy (pension age, VAT, yes, and fuel prices, too) Bullshit. Directions never contain such detail.

. Of course they do not contain, but according to such detail, the direction of domestic policy is visible. Or by what signs do you determine?
“I don’t have more time for your education and upbringing” - take care of yourself, try to work with logic, then you will enlighten. And after stubbornly not being noticed by you, yours is "So far there is no such law - the role of the President is a pure observer." Indeed, go do your best.