NATO is concerned about the loss of air superiority

Soon aviation NATO risks losing air superiority, according to a new North Atlantic bloc strategy for developing the European Air Force.

The main threats are the newest air defense systems and space assets.

NATO recognizes that decades of indisputable (superiority) air operations can be completed,

приводит RIA News excerpt from the document.

According to experts of the alliance, in the near future, threats will become transnational in nature and are likely to have long-term implications for security and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.

In this regard, the alliance must be ready to conduct military operations against any adversary, according to the strategy.

At the same time, the Air Force must work closely with special units - the marine and cybernetic ones, the authors of the document emphasize.

According to them, NATO aircraft must reach a new level of quality, which makes it possible to conduct military operations in all regions and conditions, including well-protected airspace.

Recall last week, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg expressed confidence that at the upcoming summit of the alliance, which will begin work on July 11 in Brussels, the European countries will show unity and take decisions in the interests of the entire organization.

Comments

[Vanek]

Achtung! Achtung! Pokryschkin ist in der Luft!

Attention! Attention! Pokryshkin in the sky.

[Teberii]

That's right. Only the tribes in Africa are left. To bomb others with impunity just will not work.

[siberalt]

Somehow, "air superiority" is determined in the course of hostilities, and not only hypothetically.

[Vlad.by]

An understanding of one’s own superiority ends at the same time as the desire to put on a diaper before departure.
With terrible diarrhea and universal lulliness even before leaving for the base.

[Wendigo]

Quote: Teberii

Only the tribes in Africa are left.

So Russia in Syria, in fact, also these same "African tribes" and bombing.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Wendigo

Quote: Teberii

Only the tribes in Africa are left.

So Russia in Syria, in fact, also these same "African tribes" and bombing.

Bombing, so what? This is not the case.
In fact, NATO has formed a powerful bias towards aviation. For the Americans, he is justified, yet they are going to fight exclusively on the overseas theater. But here is why this same course of action, like trained monkeys repeated the US satellites on NATO, is a huge question ...

To overcome the normal air defense system, balanced by the components "Air" - "Earth", a fire-impact system balanced by the same components is also necessary. But judging by the article, the Americans are not going to give up their interests, and they are imposing on the satellites the same system with a hypertrophied aviation component, which is simply more advanced and at the same time much more expensive. For from this, the American "domestic manufacturer" must have its own gesheft.
Roughly speaking, where there is a relatively relatively cheap long-range MLRS, new expensive aviation weapons will be shoved that will use new very expensive aircraft.

[Vanek]

Quote: Wendigo

So Russia in Syria, in fact, also these same "African tribes" and bombing.

So the topic of the article is not about Russia.

[novel66]

and some do not spit in Russia - and the day was gone

[Vanek]

Quote: novel xnumx

and the day is gone

And the "spit" has disappeared somewhere ...

Novel

[Wendigo]

Quote: novel xnumx

and some do not spit in Russia - and the day was gone

Can it really be a spit? If so, things are bad with Russia ....
And who is bombing the RF there in your opinion? Disguised Amer instructors? Maybe the abrams disguised as pickups? Or f-16 disguised as artisanal drones?

[ALEXANDER ABDRAKHMANOV_4]

Russia in Syria is at war with the allies of America. They created terrorists there to fight against Syria and Russia and arm them. These are all US mercenaries, as well as their entire army. America does not admit that we are fighting. It’s just that these units are given names so that they do not recognize the forgery. It has long been known who is fighting there, they always protect their scum, not only with weapons but also through the media.

[bouncyhunter]

That’s why the NATO generals have become sorrowful: well, how will the blank fly into their summer fly? With this sauce, extortion of money from EuroNATO workers will begin.

[novel66]

will arrive. will certainly fly! let them walk on the ground - there’s nowhere to fall

[rocket757]

Buy more of our most, most, aircraft .... that's the whole dilemma!
Hi Pash
Nothing new .... they want to dominate, okay, just not close to us and some others, which is very justified, as I understand it!

[bouncyhunter]

Victor, hi! You understand correctly. Napoleonic ambitions will not bring to good.

[MPN]

pasha An article is a set of phrases that even the author does not understand ..

threats will be transnational

What is it like? , earlier apparently with nationalities it was easier.

the alliance must be prepared to conduct combat operations against any enemy

Previously, they did not consider only NATO members as opponents, now they do not trust them?

the ability to conduct hostilities in all regions and conditions

I understand that before only learning to fight over the beaches. It can be accepted if this is a specific allusion to the Arctic.

[bouncyhunter]

Hello !

Quote: MPN

It can be accepted if this is a specific allusion to the Arctic.

I do not exclude that it is. If only those who do not belong to it sideways climb into the development of the Arctic ...

[rocket757]

Hello Roman
In my opinion, the gay politicians, leaders, really survived all the horror stories about the terrible Mordor .... there was a necessary, standard set for the average man and a mustache!
Judging by their military affairs, by ministers and conscripts. they do not want to fight yet!
Sales are particularly formidable, they can’t create, Schaub seriously scare someone!
Euro officials and NATO strategists are stirring something up there, but if you look, it’s not a shock, it’s all a destructive armada, so it’s especially sensitive to scare.
Honestly, with their resources, human and material, they can be the most formidable force here and now ... it seems they just don’t need that!
All fattened, lazy peoples. nation. state. Empire than finished ??? New barbarians came, hungry and evil, swept away everything in its path!
It may not yet, but somehow it seems that already the day before!

[electrooleg]

NATO is concerned about the loss of air superiority

Where did this superiority come from? Are there any sick schizophrenics there in their pentagon?

[Beltasir matyagu]

During the Middle East conflicts during the USSR, it turned out that our air-to-air missiles and fighter jets are not very good against the f-15 and the like. As a result, they began to hastily make the Mig-29 and Su-27 and new weapons. The enemy shook our older MiGs with frightening ease even at a distance. And they couldn’t answer the same thing, they couldn’t effectively conduct a missile defense maneuver, get it from a distance. Engineers and the military were not divan and understood correctly. They didn’t begin to read the mantra "these Arabs simply do not know how to fly," and if there were several si cynes knocked down. Such a misfortune

[just exp]

oh, these American election bots. when Israel had the F-15, almost all the wars with the Arabs ended.

[Beltasir matyagu]

The Arabs do not have a moment29, which will kill all f-15. In Yugoslavia, several aircraft have always worked against one MiG. When fighting on equal terms at the output, we get fragments of f15. There are a couple of MiGs that didn’t bomb at the airfield that crippled a bunch of NATO aircraft, judging by the fact that American censorship wasn’t hooked. Americans always conceal loss and damage

[mihey]

States "allies": We will force you to buy f35!

[Wendigo]

Quote: mihey

States "allies": We will force you to buy f35!

For patriots, this is of course a pleasant but extremely stupid excuse for why they threw all sorts of poop “fu” -35 even with jambs off their hands at the lokhid, and no one needs the “no-cost" su-57, moreover, it seems even their own MO.

[Vanek]

Quote: Wendigo

"fu" -35 even with jambs tear off with hands at the lokhida

And they are told to take and they take.

They do not answer for themselves simply.

- They will not take the gas off.

Remember?

[Wendigo]

Quote: Vanek

And they are told to take and they take.

But Turkey was told not to take it, but they still want to take it, how is it?
And to such an extent they want that they threaten sanctions and threaten to sue ...
So your knockout logic.

[Vanek]

Quote: Wendigo

even with jambs tear off with the hands of a lokhid

Quote: Wendigo

So your knockout logic

[mihey]

You do not seem to think when you read. My post is about the semantic load of all these NATO statements. Well, if it’s more convenient for you, let's replace the F35 with, say, a Patriot or a couple of thousand Abrams. The US military-industrial complex needs money and is beaten out by quite normal actions of gopniks like our 90s: "Man, buy a brick or we will punish you in our own way." That's clearer?

[Wendigo]

Quote: mihey

let's replace the F35 with, say, Patriot or a couple of thousand Abrams.

You want to say that Americans are forced to buy abrams and patriots?
Are there concrete examples? Do you even know how many countries are legally prohibited from supplying weapons? If all these restrictions are removed, then the share of the Russian Federation in the market will noticeably lose weight.

[mihey]

You are clearly not very smart and obviously do not understand the meaning of what is written. Apparently, you do not know how to think at all. I can only regret that you are not able to understand simple things. Let's leave this phrase here (maybe it will be clearer).

The US military needs money

[Mountain shooter]

Well, forget about superiority ... You have neither the means nor the opportunities. No resources, for the most part ... They thought about the “well-protected space” bombing
Well, well ... Do you have enough trained pilots? When rockets hit, not all survive. Maybe you heard?

[Xander]

In this regard, the alliance must be ready to conduct military operations against any adversary, according to the strategy.
At the same time, the Air Force must work closely with special units - the marine and cybernetic ones, the authors of the document emphasize.

And while the NATO sea cyborgs are looking through binoculars the expanses of Russia and the sea of ​​China, the enemy with vuvuzels and hookahs seeps in small groups on scows and kayaks to the rear.

[Beltasir matyagu]

I will not give a shekel for their words.

[lopvlad]

NATO is concerned about the loss of air superiority

we’re just analyzing NATO’s childhood fears. The very one that everywhere where it could have created missile defense bases and facilities around the perimeter of Russia.
While Russia is cutting funding for the army and are looking through their fingers at arms deliveries to Ukraine.

[Zaurbek]

Here, it still gets the fact that previously there was no threat to NATO of the impact on them of conventional weapons throughout the depths, and now there are NATO air defense systems hardly ready for this. And the Gauges, Iskanders, X-101 give us this opportunity to conventionally and pointly hit individual targets deep in Europe and, theoretically, even in the USA.

[Lesorub]

NATO is concerned about the loss of air superiority

Cunning !!!! )))), they want to squeeze finances from NATO allies.

[rotmistr60]

the alliance must be prepared to conduct combat operations against any enemy

This is probably necessary to understand how we lose air superiority, but we will continue to threaten everyone from behind the puddle. Be afraid and tremble, because The United States is the most powerful and richest country in the world (well, right by Greg Weiner).

[iouris]

This is for their domestic consumption. Cheers to the patriots I suggest relaxing.

[Old26]

Quote: elektroleg

NATO is concerned about the loss of air superiority

Where did this superiority come from? Are there any sick schizophrenics there in their pentagon?

By the number of military aircraft, NATO is almost 4 times superior to Russia ....

[Thunderbolt]

It’s clear with the European strategy. It differs little from the previous ones. http://militaryarticle.ru/zarubezhnoe-voennoe-obo
zrenie / 2007-zvo / 7501-osnovnye-napravlenija-razvit
ija-vvs-europejskih.
And what about our strategy? How are the plans implemented and what are the development guidelines?

[Anchonsha]

Uncle NATA, do not you think that you need to find a common language with Russia or the whole of Europe will burn. But you bastards are still thinking of gaining superiority. It is with Russia now and will remain forever. You frighten us with the creation of a videoconferencing system and constant watch in the upper layers of the atmosphere, we already have something to lower you charred from there. So keep in mind and remember the proposal of our president - to sit down at the table and think about how to continue living.