Military Review

Why does the United States repair old Soviet airfields at the borders of Russia?

59
Information service Russia Today publishes interviews with military expert Yury Knutov. The interview raised the question of why the United States invested in the repair of old airfields built during Soviet times in the western republics of the Union and in the Warsaw Pact countries.


Yuri Knutov believes that in this way the United States continues to exert pressure on Russia. In addition, in the United States, according to the expert, they realized the fact that the combat readiness of European partners leaves much to be desired. Knutov notes that the restoration of airfields allows the United States to expand the capabilities of its both military and military transport aviation.

Why does the United States repair old Soviet airfields at the borders of Russia?


In an interview with RT, Yury Knutov adds that the constant NATO statements about Russia's alleged readiness to invade one of the eastern countries of the North Atlantic military bloc are nonsense that have only one basis - moving closer and closer to the military infrastructure to the borders of Russia. The United States, he said, to some extent returned to the strategy of the Cold War.

A Russian military expert notes that the United States is provoking Russia into a new arms race, recalling the experience of the arms race with the USSR. But Russia also takes into account the experience that took place in the late Soviet Union, as well as what the arms race for the Soviet Union ended. That is why Moscow is not going to respond to the American provocation with an unlimited increase in the volume of the defense budget, but responds asymmetrically, which causes bouts of frank indignation among political elites in Washington.
Photos used:
Wikipedia
59 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 210ox
    210ox 27 June 2018 06: 34
    +15
    Why!? The answer is obvious, getting ready for war ..
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 27 June 2018 06: 46
      +6
      Dima hi Clear as a day! For that, airfields exist! And getting closer and closer.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 27 June 2018 09: 13
        +1
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        For that, airfields exist! And getting closer and closer.

        The main thing is that the airfields are within the reach of the Iskanders. Hitting the runway and all flights hang up.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 June 2018 10: 25
          +5
          Yuri Knutov in an interview with RT adds that NATO’s constant statements about Russia's alleged readiness to invade one of the eastern countries of the North Atlantic military bloc - nonsense that have only one foundation - move military infrastructure closer and closer to Russia's borders. The United States, he said, is to some extent RETURNING to the Cold War strategy.

          The cold war of the United States and the collective West never stopped - and even after the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and the establishment of Gaidar-Yeltsinism in Russia. On the contrary Washington regrets that in 1991, Americans were satisfied with the US victory over the USSR / Russia in the Cold War and did not finish off Russia in the Hot War.
          All this is a visual preparation of the United States and the Pentagon’s NATO for a hot war with Russia. And it is impossible for the leadership of the Russian Federation and the Russians to turn a blind eye to this.
          1. Doliva63
            Doliva63 27 June 2018 15: 49
            +1
            Quote: Tatiana
            Yuri Knutov in an interview with RT adds that NATO’s constant statements about Russia's alleged readiness to invade one of the eastern countries of the North Atlantic military bloc - nonsense that have only one foundation - move military infrastructure closer and closer to Russia's borders. The United States, he said, is to some extent RETURNING to the Cold War strategy.

            The cold war of the United States and the collective West never stopped - and even after the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and the establishment of Gaidar-Yeltsinism in Russia. On the contrary Washington regrets that in 1991, Americans were satisfied with the US victory over the USSR / Russia in the Cold War and did not finish off Russia in the Hot War.
            All this is a visual preparation of the United States and the Pentagon’s NATO for a hot war with Russia. And it is impossible for the leadership of the Russian Federation and the Russians to turn a blind eye to this.

            On the one hand, I agree somewhere with you; on the other, I see no reason in the war. Some capitalists will "drench" others for resources - what do I have to do with it? All the same, I don’t get anything from those resources, except taxes, - the medicine is paid, I can’t live up to retirement. Let the leadership of the Russian Federation not shut its eyes, of course, but I don’t want to fight for their pipe, I myself would survive.
            1. not main
              not main 27 June 2018 22: 08
              0
              Quote: Doliva63
              Let the leadership of the Russian Federation not shut its eyes, of course, but I don’t want to fight for their pipe, I myself would survive.

              My hut is on the edge! And if the tanks go through the "hut from the edge"?
              1. Angina
                Angina 28 June 2018 07: 52
                +1
                For some time now I have also had similar sentiments. Beggar no matter the nationality of the gentleman, this is first. Secondly, the current "domestic tanks" from Moscow are more humane than German or Chinese tanks. The fact that the first do not shoot? So to survive something still does not work.
                We must have degenerated, and from the point of view of history, the right to statehood has been lost. Or the same story punishes us for our more than centuries of experience.
                1. not main
                  not main 28 June 2018 21: 34
                  0
                  Quote: AnGiNa
                  For some time now I have also had similar sentiments. Beggar no matter the nationality of the gentleman, this is first. Secondly, the current "domestic tanks" from Moscow are more humane than German or Chinese tanks. The fact that the first do not shoot? So to survive something still does not work.
                  We must have degenerated, and from the point of view of history, the right to statehood has been lost. Or the same story punishes us for our more than centuries of experience.

                  You may have degenerated. And my friends and I don’t think so! And if anyone punishes you, then this is your servility!
        2. Ivan Ivanov
          Ivan Ivanov 27 June 2018 12: 19
          +1
          Quote: Piramidon
          The main thing is that the airfields are within the reach of the Iskanders. Hitting the runway and all flights hang up.

          There is a factor of surprise, in a short time you can not have time to make a decision / point out
    3. samarin1969
      samarin1969 27 June 2018 06: 54
      +2
      Quote: 210ox
      Why!? The answer is obvious, getting ready for war ..

      We can say that they are preparing to change the future in Russia and Europe. Financial and migration problems in 10 years can cause internal conflicts. To "extinguish" with benefit for themselves, the US is expanding the map of airfields.
    4. The black
      The black 27 June 2018 06: 59
      +4
      Why does the United States repair old Soviet airfields at the borders of Russia?
      What would we be, where to plant ILs with paratroopers laughing ....... in my opinion this topic was already discussed yesterday
      1. dSK
        dSK 27 June 2018 07: 17
        0
        State Department called the difference between Russian and Chinese "threats" to the West.
        At a Senate hearing, US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Wess Mitchell said Russia and China are aggressing and trying to split the West. “Both Russia and China want to split the West: Russia seeks to split it, and China wants to take its place. They are especially aggressive in Central and Eastern Europe, ”Mitchell said on Tuesday, 26/06/18. Mitchell believes that "confrontation with Russian aggression" should be the most important task for America ".

        Under Abama, the State Department called Russia enemy number 1, last year China was the No. 1 enemy and again Russia comes first.
      2. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 27 June 2018 07: 17
        +3
        hi
        Quote: Black
        I think this topic was already discussed yesterday

        This in pedagogy is called “Securing the passed material”. But in a simple way: repetition is the mother of learning. wink
        1. The black
          The black 27 June 2018 07: 19
          +1
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          This in pedagogy is called “Securing the passed material”. But in a simple way: repetition is the mother of learning.

          hi Yes, but we can say that the army is not accepted to repeat twice smile
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 27 June 2018 07: 23
            +1
            Quote: Black
            it’s not customary in the army to repeat twice

            For the "especially gifted" can be repeated three times. Like in a joke:
            Warrant Officer for soldiers:
            - If you have problems with memory, then get yourself a notebook and write down. I have four of them.
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 27 June 2018 07: 43
              +1
              Let's clean, podshamanim vigorous baton .... well, the armored train will open the pair, for every t.s. ...... and then everything is according to plan, there’s nothing to twitch in vain!
            2. Vanek
              Vanek 27 June 2018 08: 53
              +2
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              in a joke


              - Ivanov.

              - I!

              - Painting the fence.

              - There is!

              - Sexual.

              - I!

              - Wash the floors.

              - What?

              - A rag.

              - What?

              - Sexual.

              - I!
        2. MPN
          MPN 27 June 2018 11: 07
          +3
          Why does the United States repair old Soviet airfields at the borders of Russia?
          And really, why? The new ones would be better built, their own, not to be attached to our heritage ... laughing
      3. Doliva63
        Doliva63 27 June 2018 16: 05
        +1
        Quote: Black
        Why does the United States repair old Soviet airfields at the borders of Russia?
        What would we be, where to plant ILs with paratroopers laughing ....... in my opinion this topic was already discussed yesterday

        Sorry, did not see this discussion hi I’ll insert it here - ILs with paratroopers have not won a single victory. Even in the 68th, when almost two dozen BTA regiments were collected from all over the Union for the transfer of 2 VDDs (how many today?), Almost everything was already decided by the Ground Forces (GSVG). So these airfields should be considered solely as missile strike targets. drinks
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 27 June 2018 07: 54
      +1
      It looks like there will be a new Warsaw Treaty. But what about him, but without airfields? winked
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 27 June 2018 10: 23
        +1
        With Warsaw? Contract?
        However, probably their business was meant? Ours was not there?
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 27 June 2018 06: 45
    +14
    Is this not one of the signs of preparation for a possible war (major armed conflict)? Here you can see not only the desire of the United States (NATO) to put pressure on Russia, but also the preparation of the infrastructure for conducting possible hostilities. All the talk that the Americans don’t dare is afraid, etc. becomes simple complacency amid developing events. And it’s time to put the Baltic mongrels back in place, incl. and economically stopping all trade with them and the use of their ports.
    1. keeper03
      keeper03 27 June 2018 08: 58
      0
      Gennady, this time we will answer in full! We will not leave a single fascist-tolerast-Jankers-Russophobe! Let’s put everyone to the expense !!! To live to the main righteous battle of human civilization !!! hi angry soldier
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 27 June 2018 06: 58
    +4
    Somewhere a sound thought flashed. To convey to our European "partners" that any jumping towards Russia - and Russia will use nuclear weapons against the aggressor. With all the ensuing consequences for the countries from whose territory there will be attempts. And the strategic nuclear forces directly on the "nest" so that the "shining city on the hill" also did not miss. wassat
  4. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 27 June 2018 07: 04
    +1
    It’s even not bad, they will also be useful to us in the future! And you don’t need to run to catch them, if you suddenly need to give them a boot — always at hand!
  5. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 27 June 2018 07: 08
    0
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Is this not one of the signs of preparation for a possible war (major armed conflict)? Here you can see not only the desire of the United States (NATO) to put pressure on Russia, but also the preparation of the infrastructure for conducting possible hostilities. All the talk that the Americans don’t dare is afraid, etc. becomes simple complacency amid developing events. And it’s time to put the Baltic mongrels back in place, incl. and economically stopping all trade with them and the use of their ports.


    With foreign hands they are ready to put Russia in its place until the last European! Although the war is bad, but these am-nasty "figures" do not leave us any choice! It’s time to demilitarize Europe! And restore justice on our western borders! A couple of dozen "Daggers" sticking out of their rolls will decorate the big picture!
  6. Simon
    Simon 27 June 2018 07: 09
    0
    The United States is investing in the repair of old airfields built during Soviet times in the western republics of the Union and in the countries of the Warsaw Pact Organization. --- I feel that they are investing in an empty denyuzhka, they won’t wait for us to attack them! tongue
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 27 June 2018 11: 25
      0
      Quote: Simon
      I feel like investing in an empty denyuzhku

      Someone is not wasted. A good half of these dyushki stick to playful hands. They have sawers there - pros.
  7. Simon
    Simon 27 June 2018 07: 12
    0
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Somewhere a sound thought flashed. To convey to our European "partners" that any jumping towards Russia - and Russia will use nuclear weapons against the aggressor. With all the ensuing consequences for the countries from whose territory there will be attempts. And the strategic nuclear forces directly on the "nest" so that the "shining city on the hill" also did not miss. wassat

    But the new NATO Allies do not think about this, what they will be the first to receive in full and will be destroyed and destroyed. fool
  8. Fungus
    Fungus 27 June 2018 07: 17
    -1
    Prepare for war
  9. Simon
    Simon 27 June 2018 07: 22
    0
    Quote: samarin1969
    Quote: 210ox
    Why!? The answer is obvious, getting ready for war ..

    We can say that they are preparing to change the future in Russia and Europe. Financial and migration problems in 10 years can cause internal conflicts. To "extinguish" with benefit for themselves, the US is expanding the map of airfields.

    And the meaning is to expand! The flight of Iskander to these bases is only a few minutes and everything will be over. It’s just that they have nowhere to put money and they are trying to catch fear on us.
  10. Simon
    Simon 27 June 2018 07: 30
    0
    Quote: 210ox
    Why!? The answer is obvious, getting ready for war ..

    And the meaning! What do they want to destroy themselves? Any war, if it threatens our state and people, always ends in the capitals of aggressor states. Apparently in Europe and America they forgot history or do not know at all.
  11. Beltasir matyagu
    Beltasir matyagu 27 June 2018 07: 34
    0
    Getting ready. The likely goal, by the way, is not only Russia but also Belarus to a greater extent. Just when attacking Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan should automatically enter the war. And suffered ...
    1. Angina
      Angina 28 June 2018 07: 57
      0
      I wouldn’t hope today in Kazakhstan: a separate country, even moving to the Latin alphabet.
  12. midshipman
    midshipman 27 June 2018 08: 02
    +4
    In 1989, about 2000 airdromes were operated in the Warsaw Pact countries. On the territory of the Russian Federation, there were about 1500. All the erodorms of Western Europe of the NATO countries were under our guns and were scheduled for specific destruction by a specific air force in the event of a conflict. Cards carried a two-letter vulture. These data, as I know, were tagged and drunk by the United States. Now again, everything will have to be brought into proper condition for the security of Russia.
    1. sergei28
      sergei28 27 June 2018 12: 21
      0
      maybe it's you midshipman sold the secret plan to NATO?
  13. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 27 June 2018 08: 35
    +2
    We can conclude that the NATO troops are preparing for a war with us, in contrast to our Armed Forces, which in the exercises work out only counteraction to all kinds of "terrorists", and not for full-fledged military operations
  14. Altona
    Altona 27 June 2018 08: 53
    0
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    To convey to our European "partners" that any jumping towards Russia - and Russia will use nuclear weapons against the aggressor.

    -----------------------------
    It seems that they reported that nuclear weapons would be applied immediately in the United States. Europe will be calmed down by conventional weapons.
  15. Altona
    Altona 27 June 2018 08: 56
    0
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    We can conclude that the NATO troops are preparing for a war with us, in contrast to our Armed Forces, which in the exercises work out only counteraction to all kinds of "terrorists", and not for full-fledged military operations

    --------------------------------
    NATO members are preparing to pacify the civilian population. The war in their view will be mainly from the air. Well, what about the "counterterrorism", depending on what you invest in this term. If a single rebel or a group of such - this is one. If irregular mobile formations, then another.
  16. ashnajder
    ashnajder 27 June 2018 08: 58
    -1
    well, it’s just that the military has already ceased to be afraid of nuclear weapons, there is more and more research that countries will survive a nuclear conflict, all the more impossible to consolidate success on earth, the states are overseas, and their fleet is the best. So nuclear war is inevitable.
    1. Angina
      Angina 28 June 2018 07: 59
      0
      Countries will survive, only the inhabitants in them will be only insects. And that’s not all.
  17. gukoyan
    gukoyan 27 June 2018 09: 24
    +1
    The fascists, too, in 1941 brought enormous forces to our borders .. Damn, but history repeats itself ...
  18. tolyasik0577
    tolyasik0577 27 June 2018 09: 54
    0
    Awesome settled down. They print loot as much as the soul desires and distribute it not right and left. It is already necessary to somehow resolve this issue.
  19. Normal ok
    Normal ok 27 June 2018 10: 30
    0
    Why the US is repairing old Soviet airfields

    Because they need repairs laughing
    1. gukoyan
      gukoyan 29 June 2018 13: 12
      0
      Well, Russian roads also need repair)
  20. izja
    izja 27 June 2018 10: 37
    +2
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Somewhere a sound thought flashed. To convey to our European "partners" that any jumping towards Russia - and Russia will use nuclear weapons against the aggressor. With all the ensuing consequences for the countries from whose territory there will be attempts. And the strategic nuclear forces directly on the "nest" so that the "shining city on the hill" also did not miss. wassat


    In response, there will also come a lot, they will fill it up in full, there is no doubt about it and life will never be the same, not kindergartens, not schools, people will turn into moles underground, do you want your children such a future? Before waving pisyunom, make sure that the wind does not blow from the opposite direction.
    1. Nikolay Fedorov
      Nikolay Fedorov 27 June 2018 13: 13
      +1
      Quote: izja
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Somewhere a sound thought flashed. To convey to our European "partners" that any jumping towards Russia - and Russia will use nuclear weapons against the aggressor. With all the ensuing consequences for the countries from whose territory there will be attempts. And the strategic nuclear forces directly on the "nest" so that the "shining city on the hill" also did not miss. wassat

      In response, there will also come a lot, they will fill it up in full, there is no doubt about it and life will never be the same, not kindergartens, not schools, people will turn into moles underground, do you want your children such a future? Before waving pisyunom, make sure that the wind does not blow from the opposite direction.

      You just wave the pisyun, dear Izya. And Mountain Shooter, in fact, expressed his common sense. What do the Americans need at our borders ?! Do not climb, cool, step back. Russia has something to hit, so do not panic.
  21. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 27 June 2018 10: 39
    0
    The goal here is the same - to prepare the infrastructure for the next war with Russia ...
    1. Ronald Reagan
      Ronald Reagan 27 June 2018 13: 03
      0
      Why fight with you if you / you can buy? wink
  22. Ros 56
    Ros 56 27 June 2018 11: 38
    0
    Yes, let them repair, over time they will come in handy, invest less money in the western buffer outpost.
  23. Nikolay Fedorov
    Nikolay Fedorov 27 June 2018 13: 06
    +1
    Quote: from article
    For what purpose does the United States invest in the repair of old airfields built during the Soviet era in the western republics of the Union and in the countries of the Warsaw Treaty Organization? Yuri Knutov believes that in this way the United States continues to exert pressure on Russia.

    An interesting such "expert Knutov" ... tongue When, late in the evening, in a dark nook, the gopniks approach the “expert Knutov,” he usually thinks, “Pressure on the expert?” belay
  24. flicker
    flicker 27 June 2018 15: 01
    0
    Why does the United States repair old Soviet airfields at the borders of Russia?
    To keep his allies in fear. laughing They lived and lived, but now they suddenly become a target for the Russian nuclear forces. Well, airfields will protect them laughing
  25. Doliva63
    Doliva63 27 June 2018 16: 09
    0
    Quote: bouncyhunter
    Quote: Black
    it’s not customary in the army to repeat twice

    For the "especially gifted" can be repeated three times. Like in a joke:
    Warrant Officer for soldiers:
    - If you have problems with memory, then get yourself a notebook and write down. I have four of them.

    Paul, hi The ensign with 4 notebooks killed me - power! I did not pull more than one - at first I began to forget to write, then I began to forget the notebook laughing drinks
  26. Puler
    Puler 27 June 2018 17: 48
    0
    Morons! stupid people, those who believe that at the time of X, someone or something can take off from these airfields ...
  27. Antares
    Antares 27 June 2018 23: 12
    0
    the question of why the United States invests in the repair of old airfields built during Soviet times in the western republics of the Union and in the countries of the Warsaw Treaty Organization.

    Because they CAN.
    They manuals (enough to feed those or those) alas, do not write ...
    do what they need. Infrastructure needed. And not necessarily against the Russian Federation. They have bought the Russian Federation for a long time. The role is assigned. A very responsible role among other things.
    They look at the future.
  28. Pimokat
    Pimokat 28 June 2018 04: 40
    0
    Quote: Tatiana
    The cold war of the United States and the collective West never stopped - and even after the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and the establishment of Gaidar-Yeltsinism in Russia.


    Well, what about, “Gorbi”, so beloved in the West, was awarded the same medal for victory in the Cold War ...
  29. Yuri Mikhailovsky
    Yuri Mikhailovsky 28 June 2018 16: 37
    0
    Preparing for war
  30. sailor52
    sailor52 29 June 2018 00: 08
    0
    In an interview with RT, Yury Knutov adds that constant NATO statements about Russia's alleged readiness to invade one of the eastern countries of the North Atlantic military bloc are nonsense


    And what if NATO, in the legend of its teachings, means not Russia, but Belarus?
    They will find a reason, take a bite, start military actions, and there will be another Donbass ... As a lever of influence on Russia ...
    It turns out or not is another question.
  31. colonel manuch
    colonel manuch 27 July 2018 17: 17
    0
    The adversaries are taken, but in vain! “Locals” do not seem to understand what they will get in the first place, but for the most “I don’t want to.” Everything will be covered, both near and far (their “Sakharov wave”), it will wash away, like everything else on the east coast, for the west our brainy guys will give something, and Ielstone has not been canceled yet.