Artillery. Large caliber. 152 mm howitzer cannon ML-20 model 1937 year


Allow yourself a little preface.

Speaking of the artillery of the last century, I want to once again express a certain admiration. Indeed, the god of war. Yes, today stories about art systems do not cause as much interest and excitement as stories / shows of the same tanksbut ...

Agree, there is something fascinating in these howitzers and guns. Yes, there is no secrecy and mystery of tanks (and what’s inside?), Everything is in sight. But from this the guns and howitzers do not become less attractive.

Although it is possible, we are just artillery maniacs.

Working with numerous materials about the howitzer gun ML-20, we felt the constant "pressure" of the authority of the truly respected and authoritative predecessors. Practically in all the works there are many rave reviews, examples, comparisons. The system created by F. F. Petrov really deserves these words. It deserves already for how many soldier lives saved in numerous wars 20 century. Or, on the contrary, claimed - in relation to the lives of soldiers of the opposing side.

And in gratitude for the lives they had saved, the front-line soldiers called this destroyer of artillery batteries, engineering structures and armored vehicles of the enemy Emelya. I do not want analogies, but he, the fabulous Emelya, could also do everything. The only difference is that one used the opportunities of the pike, and the second managed with what the creators awarded him.

However, with all due respect to the opinion of the artillery authorities, it is impossible to create a "wagon" that would correspond to the best samples of the "specialists". Specialized weapons will always be better than the universal. A gun is better than a howitzer cannon, a howitzer too.

But such advantages are visible only when the commander has different types of artillery systems. That in a war does not happen often.

This is what can explain the enthusiasm with which the ML-20 howitzer cannon is absolutely correctly awarded.

Артиллерия. Крупный калибр. 152-мм гаубица-пушка МЛ-20 образца 1937 года

Before you start talking about this system, you need to clarify the term used for this instrument. Howitzer cannon. The fact is that in some works this term is reversed: the gun-howitzer. In the designation of such tools in the first place always put that type of gun, the property of which is preserved to a greater degree. For ML-20 is a howitzer. Therefore, it is necessary to call this system a howitzer-cannon, and not a howitzer-cannon.

True, the authors did not find such a term in the descriptions of any other artillery systems. This leads to an interesting conclusion. Most likely, the term was introduced specifically for the ML-20. He seemed to emphasize the unique fighting qualities of these guns.

The classic field howitzer with a short barrel were more powerful guns. In this they surpassed the ML-20. And the classic long-range long-barreled guns of special power exceeded the ML-20 in the firing range. Theoretically, it turns out that the new system is inferior to both systems. Thus, the need for such a tool seems to be absent.

And what in practice? ML-20 is like in a niche between field howitzers and long-range guns of special power. And it is necessary to consider this fact from a completely different position.

In opposition to howitzers, this system has an undoubted advantage - the firing range. This means that in a real battle it can strike enemy howitzer batteries without the possibility of return fire. Excellent counterbattery!

More difficult with special power cannons. Here, with the same tactics of combat, as against howitzers, the system will obviously lose. But! The ML-20 is lighter and more mobile. And, therefore, it is capable of changing positions much faster than heavy weapons of special power.

Of course, the heavy ML-20 "fit-in-the-belting" to the battery of German long-range guns would look ridiculous. But, in stories The Great Patriotic War has examples of just such a confrontation. And howitzers-guns won these fights! Not at the expense of more confident firing. Just ranged guns took care. Piece fighters. And quite complicated to manufacture. Therefore, in the event of serious gunfire attacks, the batteries changed positions!

By the way, the question of the cost of the gun, as well as the question of the technological solutions of production, is important in terms of preparing for war. And during the war archiaktualn. The tool should be cheap to manufacture and technologically easy to manufacture.

The history of the howitzer cannon ML-20 begins in Tsarist Russia. It was then that the most successful weapon of that time appeared in the Russian army: the 152-mm siege cannon of the Schneider system's 1910 model. At least in ballistics, at that time, there was no better instrument in the world.

By the end of the Civil War, it became clear that the gun needs to be upgraded. Talking about this, ultimately, turned into a task for the Perm plant number XXUMX (Motovilikhinsky plant). Modernization was carried out twice. In 172 and in 1930. However, the flaws of the old gun could not be fixed. Although, some innovations and allowed to talk about more or less successful modernization. But the requirements for such tools are constantly increasing.

On the instructions of the GAU, the Motovilikhinsky plant began work on a new instrument for the ML-15. Moreover, this system was supposed to be really in many ways new. However, Plant No. XXUMX was a production! And the designers were well aware that any “technological revolution” for the plant would result in many problems.

That is why, in parallel, in an initiative manner, work was carried out on the design and another system - ML-20. Systems that would use the technologies already created at the plant would be easier to manufacture and, ultimately, could be put into production as soon as possible.

The barrel with the gate both systems borrowed from its predecessor. Moreover, the ML-20 used wheel travel, suspension and frame guns arr. 1910 / 34

The task of the GAU was completed by April 1936. The gun entered the field testing.

Alas, but the product was unfinished. Tests have shown that the system does not meet the requirements. The sample has been sent for revision to the factory. It was the “revolutionism” of the gun that affected.

In March 1937, the second tests of the ML-15 began. This time the gun showed exactly the results that the military demanded. Moreover, some sources even talk about positive recommendations for the mass production of this system.

In December, 1936, the second sample was delivered to the landfill. 25 December, 1936, began testing the ML-20. For most requirements, this system complies with the tasks. Some remarks related to the mast. The revision didn’t take much time and the gun became exactly the same as the military saw it.

To date, there are disputes about why the ML-20 was adopted for service.

The authors of many works refer to the opinion of such a "monster" as A. B. Shirokorad. Indeed, the ML-15 was more mobile due to the smaller (on 500 kg in combat and 600 kg in the stowed position), had a greater speed of return (up to 45 km / h), more modern, but complex carriage.

In our opinion, Shirokorad was prevented by the "blinders" of a prominent specialist. From the point of view of the scientist, the ML-15 is better. But life makes its own adjustments. The fact that GAU took exactly ML-20, significantly influenced the designer of the plant. Production workers.

Since the technological equipment of the production of ML-15 had yet to be developed, and this required time and money, the position of production workers played the decisive role. With a minimum cost, we will give the tools in the shortest possible time! We have ready lines for the production of all components of the gun.

True, yes, one can seriously argue about the weight of the guns. But this drawback is completely insignificant in view of the fact that the system was not designed for the regimental or divisional level. It was a corps cannon. Moreover, the ML-20 has become a duplex with an X-NUMX-mm A-122 cannon.

Whatever it was, but 22 September 1937, ML-20 was adopted by the Red Army under the official name "152-mm howitzer-gun sample 1937 g.".

The gun had a modern enough for its time design with a carpet with sliding beds and a sprung wheel course. The barrel was produced in two varieties - bonded and monoblock (some sources mention the third option - with a free pipe).

The ML-20 was equipped with a piston bolt, a hydraulic spindle recoil brake, a hydropneumatic knurler, and had a separate sleeve loading.

The shutter has a mechanism for the forced extraction of spent cartridges when it is opened after the shot and a fuse that locks the shutter after loading before the shot is fired. If for some reason it was necessary to discharge the gun, you must first switch the fuse switch to allow the shutter to open.

To facilitate loading at high elevation angles, the official ML-20 is equipped with a liner retention mechanism. The descent is performed by pressing the trigger using the trigger cord.

The tool had a mechanism of mutual closure, which prevents the opening of the gate, if the barrel is not properly connected to the recoil device. To mitigate recoil on recoil devices and carriage, the ML-20 was equipped with a powerful massive muzzle brake of a slit type. The thumbset and hatch contain 22 liters of liquid each, the pressure in the thumbnail is 45 atmospheres.

A distinctive feature of the ML-20 is a unique combination of different elevation angles and initial projectile speeds, which are defined by the choice of one of thirteen propelling charges. As a result, the gun could also be used as a howitzer, firing at a hinged trajectory with a relatively low projectile speed, and as a gun - at a flat trajectory with a high projectile speed. The gun was equipped with a telescopic sight for direct fire shooting, and an artillery panorama for firing from closed positions.

The carriage with sliding beds is equipped with a balancing mechanism and shield cover. Metal wheels with rubber tires (some of the early guns had wheels with knitting needles and rubber weights from a cannon sample 1910 / 34), leaf springs.

The gun was usually carried on a carriage with the barrel in a drawn position.

The transition time from traveling to combat was 8 — 10 minutes. For short distances, the system could be transported with the trunk not drawn at a speed of 4 — 5 km / h.

The gun rack of the ML-20 was recognized as normalized, received the designation 52-L-504А and was used in the modernization of the 122-mm gun A-19.

For transportation of the ML-20, the Voroshilovets and Komintern heavy tracked artillery tractors were used, which were produced by the Kharkov Locomotive Works.



"Stalinets" also dragged himself quite successfully.

For the first time ML-20 was used during the fighting on the river Khalkhin-Gol. The gun was actively used in the Soviet-Finnish war, where it was successfully used to destroy bunkers and billets on the Mannerheim line.

ML-20 participated in all the major operations of the Great Patriotic War, played an important role in the Battle of Kursk, being one of the few guns that can effectively deal with new well-armored German tanks and self-propelled guns. The experience of front-line use of the ML-20 showed that it was the best Soviet weapon for counter-battery firing.

Interestingly, the first shot in Germany, produced by 2 August 1944, was made from ML-20.

Performance characteristics:

Years: 1937-1946
Produced, pcs: 6 884
Calculation persons: 9

Weight in the fighting position, kg: 7 270
Weight in the stowed position, kg: 7 930

Shooting angles:
- elevations, degrees: from -2 to + 60
- horizontal, degree: 58

Projectile initial velocity, m / s: 655
Rate of fire, rds / min: 3-4
Firing range, m: 17 230
Highway towing speed, km/h: up to 20

Like any significant weapon of the Red Army, the ML-20 was "planted" on a tank chassis. The first examples of such a symbiosis were SU-152. These machines were produced only in 1943 year. From February to December 1943, to be exact. And they were a system based on the KV-1 tank. Such SU was released 670 pieces.

In November, 1943 was decided to “transplant” the ML-20 into another chassis, based on the EC-1 tank. This system is known as ISU-152. It was produced not only during the war, but also after. The release was completed at the end of 1946, although deliveries to the troops were made even in 1947. Total released 2790 machines.

There was another car. ISU-152 arr. 1945 of the year. The machine is experimental. The metal was produced in a single copy. Different from the standard ISU-152 chassis. The IC-3 chassis was used. Most likely, this model would have to “hit” Americans along with EC-3 at a parade in Berlin.

We will not describe this car. But, for those who are interested in exactly self-propelled guns, we will inform you that MIS-152, even in variants MIS-152-1 or MIS 152-2, is a completely new machine. With powerful reservations, new howitzer ML-20CM and other innovations.

In conclusion of the article I would like to say about my own feelings from this instrument. Analyzing the design features or combat use of the ML-20 you experience a constant sense of the greatness of this weapon. It is overwhelming. Power and genius in the metal. Yes, in some museums, the authors of the exposition are trying to “dilute” this sensation with grass, peaceful landscapes, but it does not pass.

In general, the gun turned out really great. Great in its own place. And exploitation in many armies of the world only confirms this statement.

The weapon that hit the Reich first! The first instrument of retaliation for the destruction and death that our country suffered in World War II.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    26 June 2018 15: 13
    Always respected our ML-20. Really the killer of the Fritz.
  2. +4
    26 June 2018 16: 13
    Thanks so much for the article.
  3. +2
    26 June 2018 16: 18
    Thanks from the artillery!
  4. +4
    26 June 2018 17: 54
    Classic short-barreled field howitzers were more powerful guns. In this they surpassed the ML-20. And the classic long-range long-barreled guns of special power exceeded the ML-20 in firing range. Theoretically, the new system is inferior to both systems.

    Not guys, not sorted out ...
    In fact, the ML-20 is a 10/34 year gun that was taught how to throw howitzer grenades. They even had the same shooting tables.
    About the power. Quite the opposite. If the ML-20 throws light howitzer grenades, then it has the same power as classmates such as D-1 Sample 43 years. The shell is one. Well, if the cannon grenades ... They are 16 kg heavier. 8)) The "classic field howitzers" of the corps / army artillery were simply lighter and therefore more mobile.
    With guns, too, is not so simple. Yes, they had a greater range. However, it was realized by reducing the caliber (107 mm, 122 mm and, finally, 130 mm), which in turn reduced the very “power”

    Why was she called that? I have no idea. In fact, she completely retained her cannon properties, and howitzers for her became additional. Moreover, its “howitzer” was lower than that of normal G. For example, comparing the same projectile with the D-1, the OF-530 had the initial speed of 615 meters per second on the same first charge, while D-1, respectively, 457 m / s. With all the consequences, i.e. the trajectory was more flat, closer to the cannon
    1. -1
      26 June 2018 19: 26
      You that? In fact, the ML-20 could change the charge in the sleeve, so she could shoot howitzer and cannon shells.
      Great gun, ideal for the hull artillery of the time!
      1. +1
        26 June 2018 19: 54
        Quote: Kot_Kuzya
        You that? In fact, the ML-20 could change the charge in the sleeve, so she could shoot howitzer and cannon shells.

        Uh ... And where does it ????
        Take, for example, the “Genocide” 2A36. Is the charge variable? Variable. (for reference, a variable charge means "it was possible to change the charge in the sleeve") Can I shoot shells for 152-mm howitzers? It is impossible.
        Quote: Kot_Kuzya
        Great gun, ideal for the hull artillery of the time!

        Yeah ... Only now the weight disappointed, the cost and time of transfer. Therefore, in the year 43 (!!!) I had to put into service the D-1
        1. -1
          26 June 2018 20: 00
          Ouch! Hard case. D-1 is a divisional howitzer, not a hull howitzer, its firing range is only 12 km.
          1. +2
            26 June 2018 20: 26
            Quote: Kot_Kuzya
            Ouch! Hard case. D-1 is a divisional howitzer, not a hull howitzer, its firing range is only 12 km.

            D-1 is just a hull howitzer. The divisional howitzer was its predecessor, the M-10. Alas, the pre-war experiment on the introduction of 152-mm howitzers into the divisional unit was found to be unsuccessful according to the results of military practice (problems with traction + lack of competent commanders in the divisional unit), and therefore the next 152-mm howitzer D-1 was sent to corps artillery.
            1. +1
              26 June 2018 20: 55
              Quote: Alexey RA
              The divisional howitzer was its predecessor - M-10

              Everything is much more fun. The first produced D-1 went to restore the M-10 shortage in the howitzer regiments of the RGK 8))))))))
              1. +2
                27 June 2018 17: 59
                Quote: Spade
                Everything is much more fun. The first produced D-1 went to restore the M-10 shortage in the howitzer regiments of the RGK 8))))))))

                Based on our concept "support a rifle regiment with an artillery division"- nothing surprising. smile
                First of all, understaffed parts of central subordination, which always worked in the direction of the main strike. And the distribution of buns to the buildings was postponed until later (today it comes, and tomorrow it sits quietly ... and artillery is needed where the fights are going on).
                As for the RVGK artillery, in the RVGK, EMNIP, there were regiments even on 122-mm howitzers. Just for some reason, the RGVK is usually confused with the artillery of OM and BM. But OM and BM were only part of the RGVK. The main part of the RGVK was an artillery of qualitative reinforcement of the units in the direction of the main strike - the same calibers as the rifle formations, just in larger numbers. Instead of spreading artillery on a regular basis in divisions, corps and armies, they received "minimum sufficiency" staffs, but the General Staff had a strong artillery fist of central subordination, concentrating on the necessary directions.
                1. +1
                  28 June 2018 07: 11
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  there were shelves even on 122 mm howitzers.

                  Even a 45 mm anti-tank gun. 8)))
          2. +1
            26 June 2018 20: 44
            Quote: Kot_Kuzya
            D-1 is a divisional howitzer

            From what year?
            Quote: Kot_Kuzya
            its firing range is only 12 km.

            12.390 which is only 3.5 km away. less than the ML-20 with the same projectile. Well, or 5 km less than a push. grenade.
            By the way, the corps A-19 fired at 19. Will we also drive out the ML-800 from the corps / army after the D-20 due to the "insufficient" range? 1)))
            1. -1
              26 June 2018 21: 51
              In fact, for your information, D-1 after the war was generally transferred to the regimental level laughing
              1. 0
                27 June 2018 07: 56
                And during the war, they were forced to use it even at the level of the RGVK.
                It is lighter, it is cheaper, it is put into combat position five times faster than the ML-20.
  5. 0
    18 August 2018 09: 41
    Really, great trunk! Indeed, God of war! Grandfather, was baptized when 20 were mentioned!
  6. PXL
    10 February 2019 18: 00
    Minor clarifications. 1. ML-15 was created by order of the AU RKKA, ML-20 - by order of the NKTP USSR. 2. ML-15 was ordered as a completely new gun, and ML-20 - as a modernization of the 152-mm gun A-19 mod. 1910/34 3. The designers of the ML-15 in November 1936 were repressed - one as a former Trotskyist, the other for anti-Soviet agitation and both for disrupting the plan for production at factory No. 172 named after V.M. Molotov gun A-19.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"