The UN adopted a resolution on the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Transnistria. Dodon's statement

Moldovan President Igor Dodon commented on the resolution on Transnistria adopted by the UN General Assembly. This is a resolution, the draft of which was prepared by representatives of the Moldovan government. It concerns this draft appeal to Russia with the “demand for the unconditional and immediate withdrawal” of peacekeepers from Transnistria.

Igor Dodona in an interview RIA News notes that the initiative of the Moldovan government is aimed exclusively at exacerbating the situation, primarily in Moldova itself.

Dodon:

It is aimed at causing serious damage to the Moldovan-Russian relations.

According to the Moldavian president, such an initiative will only lead to a deterioration of Chisinau’s position on the settlement of Transnistrian issues.

The Moldovan Foreign Ministry stated the need for Russia to comply with the resolution and that Moscow "should not react nervously to the initiative." Such a statement was allowed by the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic Tudor Ulyanovsky. At the same time, Ulyanovsky called the conflict in Transnistria not an internal problem of Moldova, but “the intervention of a third state that stationed its troops on Moldovan territory”.

In fact, the UNGA resolution is one of those documents that does not imply any obligations. The project was discussed, consulted, the decision was made - and that was all. And instead of being concerned about the presence of peacekeepers on the banks of the Dniester, the Moldovan government would be much better concerned about consolidating Moldovan society and raising the standard of living of ordinary citizens - then any problems inside the country would resolve themselves.

Comments

[Hole puncher]

Who in general listens to him in Moldova, why even quote a person whose position in the political system of the country is at the level of a clown ...

[siberalt]

Since the resolution is only of a recommendatory nature, it does not cancel the previous one by introducing Russian peacekeepers into the PMR. So all these are bubbles on water and no more.

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: siberalt

So all these are bubbles on water and no more.

Behind these bubbles, at least Romanian ears are visible. The withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers will put an end to the PMR, IMHO ...

[Tusv]

Quote: bouncyhunter

The withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers will put an end to the PMR, IMHO ...

Not. I am for the change of the political system, so that President Dadon became everything, and the parliament was nothing for nothing. We chose Dadon

[hrych]

Quote: Tusv

president dadon has become everything

Well, the main thing is that the UN decides everything in the Security Council, and not the General Assembly. This General Assembly adopted a lot of things, including against Russia and the Crimea, and Georgia (by the way, and against the American sixes, such as Israel), but our main reaction is Ignor. But Dadon is great and one hell in 2018 will be the parliamentary elections in Moldova, and here we will see. Therefore, sixes in the General Assembly are trying to manage to stir up the water.

[MPN]

demand for unconditional and immediate withdrawal

But the fact that?
It’s they who offer us Pash surrender, where are we, no matter where, never surrender? (RUSSIA, I mean) Recall the cruiser "Varyag" ...

[bouncyhunter]

They show Russia that Western interests are above all.

[MPN]

Quote: bouncyhunter

They show Russia that Western interests are above all.

Well, we show them, with us it’s not small ...

[pvv113]

Pasha, salute!
That's it -

Quote: bouncyhunter

least romanian ears

And in perspective, the United States and NATO

[bouncyhunter]

Hello Volodya! You, as always, correctly understood what I was hinting at.

[pvv113]

I propose to announce at the UN a broadening of the range of tasks facing peacekeepers. Add here protection from Somali pirates and African locusts

[bouncyhunter]

If mattresses like this idea - easily!

[pvv113]

So states with such tasks justify their presence in all parts of the Earth

[Ros 56]

and at least Romanian ears are visible with these bubbles

Well, take them by these very ears with two hands and offer them an indescribable feeling.

[bouncyhunter]

This, unfortunately, is easier said than done ... Behind them is a factory of shit-crashing of the entire planet ...

[ioan-e]

Quote: bouncyhunter

Quote: siberalt

So all these are bubbles on water and no more.

Behind these bubbles, at least Romanian ears are visible. The withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers will put an end to the PMR, IMHO ...

And start a bloody massacre!

[Andrey K]

Quote: siberalt

... Since the resolution is only of a recommendatory nature, it does not cancel the previous one by introducing Russian peacekeepers into the PMR. So all these are bubbles on water and no more. ...

Any conflict has two sides.
Both sides of the conflict - Transdniestria and Moldova - agreed to enter peacekeepers.
The UNGA made a legal blunder - but where is the consent to the withdrawal of peacekeepers from the second side of the conflict?

[AUL]

Under this decision, Ukraine, Romania and Moldova will block the movement of our goods and people through their territory (Dodon will not be able to do anything). We will not withdraw and abandon our people. So, we will break through the air, and maybe over land or the Dniester. Through Ukraine or Romania. So - aggression. What it will result in is not necessary for adults to tell. Think about it. Yes, in Transdniestria there are a large number of Russians, citizens of the Russian Federation. But the situation with it is very unfavorable for us. As a suitcase without a handle, it’s a pity to throw it and it is impossible to carry it. What to do? I dont know. But there is no hope for a political solution to the problem.

[Sergey ippon]

political decision? -our power without eggs, hence all the problems with friendly countries and allies.
already used to all passing expressing notes

[MstislavHrabr]

Will we withdraw through Odessa and through Bucharest? To ensure the safety of peacekeepers (these are countries unfriendly to us), it is necessary, as a convoy, to introduce a pair of tank armies along the route (they will go through Kiev). We will pick up on the ships. We promise to manage in 10 years ...

[ramzes1776]

Quote: Puncher

Who in general listens to him in Moldova, why even quote a person whose position in the political system of the country is at the level of a clown ...

Some kind of wedding general. Complete zero!!!

[Pissarro]

And who is listening to his opponents? They are mostly clowns and all their efforts to rule the country cause laughter. Dodon even has his own opinion, but they are looking for a quick sale and inexpensively agree

[demo]

In fact, the UNGA resolution is one of those documents that does not imply any obligations. The project was discussed, consulted, a decision was made - and that’s all.
Everything?
No, not all.
If such a decision is made at a high international level, then this speaks volumes.
There are practically no countries left in the world that either would like to speak on our side, or would not be afraid to speak for us.
This is it - that's it.

[Lekxnumx]

Initiators except Canada or neighbors or neighboring countries are Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Ukraine, Moldova. This indicates a complete failure of foreign policy in relation to its immediate neighbors.
By the way, no Russian media said anything about this not unimportant fact quote from the UN website "They also referred to the fact that the Russian Federation took upon itself" the obligation to complete the withdrawal of its armed forces and armaments from the territory of the Republic of Moldova in a specific time frame in accordance with the decision adopted at the summit of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, held in 1999 in Istanbul, Turkey. " And this already speaks of an information blockade within Russia, I checked the first page of Google, no Russian media mentioned what these countries repelled from. Together with this, the slogans "Russophobia", "anti-Russian forces", "experts" napshy found and blah blah blah.

[Volodin]

Quote: Lek38

This indicates a complete failure of foreign policy towards the nearest neighbors.

And they say this from Azerbaijan, who, of course, has neighbors, peace, grace and an exceptionally peaceful non-violent policy. Let us then take your example - get along with Armenia. And after that Russia, maybe, will be something to learn from Baku in matters of neighborhood ...

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: Volodin

And they say this from Azerbaijan, who, of course, has neighbors, peace, grace and an exceptionally peaceful non-violent policy. Let us then take your example - get along with Armenia. And after that Russia, maybe, will be something to learn from Baku in matters of neighborhood ...

What does Az-en have to do with if we are talking about Moldova and the Russian peacekeepers? Al-Az has good relations with neighbors as well as Armenia. They are good both with Russia and Turkey and with Western countries. If we talk about UN resolutions on Karabakh, then Az-en is not without a sin. Az-en did not resolution on an immediate cessation of hostilities. But then it complied with, and Armenia didn’t on an IMMEDIATE and UNCERRUPTED withdrawal of its armed forces. So the world community here is on the side of Azn. Not in Russia, the successor of the USSR should point out the errors of Azn, which imposed Veto more than 100 times .

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lek38

and Russian peacekeepers?

And where are the peacekeepers?
All the Moldovan parliament needs to do is withdraw its ratification, and, as far as I remember, after half a year there will be no peacekeepers. Without any appeals to a bunch of international organizations, without any loud statements. Delov for 10 minutes from strength.

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: Spade

All the Moldovan parliament needs to do is withdraw its ratification, and, as far as I remember, after half a year there will be no peacekeepers. Without any appeals to a bunch of international organizations, without any loud statements. Delov for 10 minutes from strength.

I don’t know about this nuance, please inform if there is time. If so, I agree with you about politicization.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lek38

I don’t know about this nuance

What do not write about it? 8)))))))))))
There are two completely separate topics, peacekeepers and the "Task Force of Russian Forces in the Transnistrian Region of the Republic of Moldova"
The former are not there by decision of the UN, CIS, OSCE and other organizations. And in accordance with the simple Russian-Moldovan bilateral “Settlement Agreement”, from which Moldova can very easily withdraw without any appeal to the “World League of Sexual Reforms”
The reason for the second being there is Sausage. And 21 thousand tons of ammunition that cannot be taken out of there. Some people just needed a reason not to fulfill the Agreement on Adaptation of the CFE Treaty, and under their pressure Ukraine actively opposed the export. And when Russia finally withdrew from this treaty, it was too late. Without proper maintenance, a lot of ammunition appeared that is simply unsafe to move
Russia honestly tried, Russia agreed with Ukraine, it was possible to export part. But not all.

And now the situation is insane. Moldovans are demanding the conclusion of the OGRV PRRM and at the same time they are very afraid that Russia will do it.

[Lekxnumx]

Firstly, thanks for being informed.

Quote: Spade

The former are not there by decision of the UN, CIS, OSCE and other organizations. And in accordance with the simple Russian-Moldovan bilateral “Settlement Agreement”, from which Moldova can very easily withdraw without any appeal to the “World League of Sexual Reforms”

I also read about it, but if Moldova does it, Russia will withdraw its troops? Rogozin said we are not going to withdraw troops quote 2018. "We will not allow the status of Transnistria to be degraded, where our compatriots and fellow citizens live, and we will not go to curtail our peacekeeping mission "

Quote: Spade

The reason for the second being there is Sausage. And 21 thousand tons of ammunition that cannot be taken out of there. Some people just needed a reason not to fulfill the Agreement on Adaptation of the CFE Treaty, and under their pressure Ukraine actively opposed the export.

Isn’t the truth of the Russian side a document of the time 1999 under which Russia signed .https: //www.osce.org/ru/mc/39573? Download = true
Quote "19. Recalling the decisions of the Budapest and Lisbon Summits
and the Oslo Ministerial Council, we reiterate that we look forward to an early
orderly and complete withdrawal of Russian troops from Moldova. In this context, we
We welcome the recent progress on the issue of withdrawal and
destruction of Russian military property stored in Transnistria
region of Moldova, and the completion of the destruction of non-transportable ammunition "
That is, even then there were ammunition that could not be taken out. Ukraine may have interfered, but this is not an argument or a reason. This problem has not yet appeared and can be destroyed on the spot.
"We welcome the commitment of the Russian Federation to complete the withdrawal
Russian forces from the territory of Moldova by the end of 2002. We also welcome
the willingness of the Republic of Moldova and the OSCE to contribute, to the best of their ability,
this process until the agreed date. "
And this quote from the document suggests that Russia could take out and Moldova wanted to contribute.

Quote: Spade

And now the situation is insane. Moldovans are demanding the conclusion of the OGRV PRRM and at the same time they are very afraid that Russia will do it.

And why? I don’t know this.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lek38

which Russia has signed

Great question ... Why Russia has signed up to this. Given that there are no conditions for the destruction of ammunition in Sausage. Why the first who came under the withdrawal / reduction were the units serving the ammunition ... What was it, stupidity or betrayal. The activities of the authorities of the time of Yeltsin require a very thorough investigation.

Quote: Lek38

And this quote from the document suggests that Russia could take out and Moldova wanted to contribute.

eight))))))))))))))
How? Beautiful statements?
For example, when Russia tried to get technology and equipment for the "explosive" disposal of ammunition, why didn’t it succeed, and no OSCE and Moldova wanted to contribute to it?

At first, Ukraine did not agree to miss echelons of ammunition. Then she agreed, but only those that could be moved SAFETY. And she was in her own right.

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: Spade

Great question ... Why Russia has signed up to this. Given that there are no conditions for the destruction of ammunition in Sausage. Why the first who came under the withdrawal / reduction were the units serving the ammunition ... What was it, stupidity or betrayal. The activities of the authorities of the time of Yeltsin require a very thorough investigation.

So we have come with you to the main side of the issue. Russia's interests! Russia is interested in maintaining peacekeepers and will not withdraw them in any case. And it is not necessary to look for the reasons and the culprits, the main reason is the interests of Russia. And you do not admit that Russia signed this document, then changed its mind with the advent of Putin? And then relations were better with Ukraine, it’s like a version. And now it’s given out as a reason not to be exported, although by 2002 there could have been a simple agreement between the allies of Ukraine and the Russian Federation in order not to fulfill the agreement. (This version)
The second version of Ukraine simply didn’t want a problem for itself, therefore it allowed only safe export. And Russia did not give a guarantee not to fulfill the conditions, because it is not in its interests. (Also version)
Russia already has the technology of non-explosive disposal, the SIGNAL plant developed in 2012. That is, now it is possible to fulfill the conditions of this document, but the Russian Federation DOES NOT WANT and will not, which is confirmed by Rogozin.
And everything else, the reasons sucked from the finger.
I’ll tell you my position on this issue, all countries are the same. You can blame it on the country of which I am a citizen and the media hang noodles to justify the actions of leaders. I am a supporter of a direct conversation without embellishment. Thank you for talking

[Severski]

Ukraine has never been against the export of Russian ammunition from Transnistria. Why would she do this? Here is an article of the time.
Transnistria banned the export of Russian weapons? Moldova in a week

Details: https://regnum.ru/news/200690.html



And relations between Russia and Ukraine until 2014 were good. If desired, they could always agree.
Moreover, even under Poroshenko, in 2016, Moldova and Ukraine agreed to provide a corridor for the withdrawal of ammunition. Here is what the Russian Federation answered: The withdrawal of Russian weapons from Transnistria is now impossible due to the situation in Ukraine. Such a statement was made by ambassador on special instructions of the RF Ministry of Foreign Affairs Sergey Gubarev, RIA Novosti reports. Read more here: http://gordonua.com/news/worldnews/mid-rf-rossiya
-ne-mozhet-vyvezti-svoe-vooruzhenie-iz-pridnestro
vya-iz-za-situacii-v-ukraine-127404.html

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lek38

And you do not admit that by signing this document, Russia, then changed your mind with the advent of Putin?

With the advent of Putin, Russia has been unilaterally honestly fulfilling the CFE Treaty for 7 years. Then this one-sidedness of Russia bothered So past.

[Severski]

I also found an article of that time about equipment for the disposal of ammunition which "no OSCE wanted to contribute to what they got":

Equipment for the disposal of Russian ammunition and weapons follows in Transnistria


https://press.try.md/mobile_item.php?id=14147

[Lopatov]

Quote: Severski

Equipment for the disposal of Russian ammunition and weapons follows in Transnistria

Somewhere on the road lost?

Quote: Severski

Moreover, even under Poroshenko, in 2016, Moldova and Ukraine agreed to provide a corridor for the withdrawal of ammunition.

Well, in 2016 Russia needs not only a corridor, but also Moldovan or Ukrainian military personnel who will risk their lives instead of Russian ones when they are exported.
Honor 2 decades of maintenance-free ammunition ...

[Severski]

I give you another link that proves that you are a liar and a frivolous interlocutor.
As an interlocutor, you completely discredited yourself, and therefore, I do not want to communicate with you anymore.
I value my time too much and do not want to waste time on emptiness.


https://press.try.md/mobile_item.php?id=31611


Equipment for the disposal of weapons and ammunition, which has been inactive for more than a year in Moldova, can be sent to Iraq. Infotag was informed about this by sources in Tiraspol.
We are talking about the Luthe melting furnace and the Donovan detonation chamber, delivered to Moldova in April 2002 for use in the disposal of Russian ammunition with an expired shelf life. However, the authorities of the unrecognized Transnistrian republic refused to let this equipment into the territory they control, as a result of which it has been idle for almost 1,5 years in one of the warehouses near Chisinau.

[-Pollux]

Quote: Severski

I also found an article of that time about equipment for the disposal of ammunition which "no OSCE wanted to contribute to what they got":
Equipment for the disposal of Russian ammunition and weapons follows in Transnistria

Just blow up all of this ammunition, like a fire.

[Severski]

Ukraine has never opposed the withdrawal of ammunition from Transnistria, from the word - never. After several echelons were removed in 2001, the "Transnistrian authorities" opposed the further export of weapons. By the way, the OSCE even provided equipment for the disposal of ammunition at the same time, and it was even used until the "Transnistrian authorities" opposed it.
I didn’t understand the humor: the Moldavians are afraid of the conclusion of OGRV? Why are they afraid?

[Lopatov]

Quote: Severski

Ukraine has never opposed the withdrawal of ammunition from Transnistria, from the word - never.

This is a lie, the absolute. It was possible to reach an agreement only in 2000 and was taken out for 4 years, until Yushchenko crawled out with a “settlement plan” and began using the barrier as an instrument of pressure on Russia to adopt this plan.

Quote: Severski

"Transnistrian authorities" opposed the further export of weapons.

Also a lie. The opposition was only at the very initial stage. Rigid, with aunts on the rails. But it was precisely with them that they managed to agree on the only ones.

Quote: Severski

After several echelons were removed in 2001, the "Transnistrian authorities" opposed the further export of weapons.

Lies again. How can “twenty-echelons” transport 20 thousand kopecks of tons of ammunition? 4 years they drove without any "opposition", exported more than half. Up to the beginning of active opposition, but not of the PMR authorities, but Yushchenko.
Apparently received a command. NATO needed reasons not to implement the adapted CFE Treaty.

Quote: Severski

I didn’t understand the humor: the Moldavians are afraid of the conclusion of OGRV? Why are they afraid?

Elementary. 21 thousand tons of ammunition will be in the hands of the PMR.

[Severski]

I showed you several articles of that time that show, as it were, to put it mildly, that you are not completely honest:
- You expressed that Ukraine counteracted the export of ammunition. Show the article of that time. For example, I showed that Transnistria counteracted.
- Further, you put it that the equipment for disposal did not want to give.
And I showed you that they gave the equipment.

Even now, as you put it, you’re doing a lie. Agreed type, only in 2000. Let me remind you that the summit took place in 1999. Looks like one year for you, wow.
Further, I showed you an article that the Transnistrian administration imposed a ban on the export of ammunition. An article from 2004, when the withdrawal of ammunition completely stopped. Perhaps you want to argue that after this the Transnistrian administration agreed to the withdrawal of ammunition? Well, we are waiting for references to how they agreed and Ukraine opposed.
Most (about 90%) of ammunition were removed in 2000-2001. Let me remind you that Russia pledged to take out the ammunition before January 1, 2002. Then, like: oh, I didn’t. But I didn’t have time because of the Transnistrians who vigorously “protested”. From 2001 to 2004, there were one or two echelons. That is the whole process.

As for the fear of Moldavians about withdrawing the OGRV, are you serious? What are they afraid of?

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: Severski

I showed you several articles of that time that show, as it were, to put it mildly, that you are not completely honest:
- You expressed that Ukraine counteracted the export of ammunition. Show the article of that time. For example, I showed that Transnistria counteracted.
- Further, you put it that the equipment for disposal did not want to give.
And I showed you that they gave the equipment.

Even now, as you put it, you’re doing a lie. Agreed type, only in 2000. Let me remind you that the summit took place in 1999. Looks like one year for you, wow.
Further, I showed you an article that the Transnistrian administration imposed a ban on the export of ammunition. An article from 2004, when the withdrawal of ammunition completely stopped. Perhaps you want to argue that after this the Transnistrian administration agreed to the withdrawal of ammunition? Well, we are waiting for references to how they agreed and Ukraine opposed.
Most (about 90%) of ammunition were removed in 2000-2001. Let me remind you that Russia pledged to take out the ammunition before January 1, 2002. Then, like: oh, I didn’t. But I didn’t have time because of the Transnistrians who vigorously “protested”. From 2001 to 2004, there were one or two echelons. That is the whole process.

As for the fear of Moldavians about withdrawing the OGRV, are you serious? What are they afraid of?

Oleg believed you in Lopatov’s unconfirmed words, some speculations. He’s not a bad guy, one of the few who can and should listen to issues of artillery. But apparently not in politics.

[Pissarro]

It is not Russia’s successor to the USSR to point out the errors of Az-on which the VETO imposed more than 100 times.

That is, in your opinion, vetoing arbitrary attempts by the bloody imperialists in their desire to start another war is bad? Strange holuy approach. By the way, your country supported the resolution in the general choir of the mattress toppers. Unlike most countries in the world that abstained. In fact, 64 sub-country countries supported their brother in the desire to cut out half a million residents of Transnistria. By the way, the Karabakh issue is similar, in the case of a hypothetical surrender of Armenia, the Karabakh Armenians will be cut out and you know it

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lek38

At the same time, the slogans “Russophobia”, “anti-Russian forces”, “experts” hurriedly found and blah blah blah.

And yet, this is exactly so.
Because how to do this - i.e. Russia cannot withdraw troops from Moldova. Technically. Also an “information blockade”, but on the other hand. Keep silent about the real reasons for this show. 8)))))))))

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: Spade

Because how to do this - i.e. Russia cannot withdraw troops from Moldova. Technically. Also an “information blockade”, but on the other hand. Keep silent about the real reasons for this show. 8)))))))))

If you pledged to bring them out at a specific time in 1999, then maybe you don’t want to say it plainly. And the fact that these countries are interested in discrediting Russia is also not casual, there’s no smoke without fire. the existing borders of Ukraine in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act; "
The first point and wait after that Ukraine will support Russia naively agree!

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lek38

If you pledged to withdraw them at a specific time in 1999, then maybe. You don’t want to speak directly

8)))))))))))))))
And what do you think, why out of the whole heap of decisions of the "Istanbul conspiracy" only this was not fulfilled?

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: Spade

And what do you think, why out of the whole heap of decisions of the "Istanbul conspiracy" only this was not fulfilled?

I’ll tell you honestly, I began to be interested in this issue recently. Literally now, I went to the UN website and read a little about the resolution. I also read that resolutions are adopted on the basis of the preamble. If you share the nuances of this issue, I can increase my horizons and if it is convincing , I’ll change my opinion about this particular resolution. I am open for discussion; there’s time, I’ll make gulls and read your opinion. You are a person not to listen to a cultural sin.

[Severski]

Technically, troops could always be removed from Moldova. And under Kuchma, and under Yushchenko, and under Yanukovych, and under Poroshenko.

Moldova announced its readiness to provide the Russian Federation with a "green corridor" for withdrawing troops from Transnistria.


https://zn.ua/UKRAINE/ministr-oborony-moldovy-zay
avil-o-gotovnosti-ukrainy-predostavit-zelenyy-kor
idor-voyskam-rf-dlya-vyhoda-iz-pridnestrovya-2294
13_.html? Utm_source = russianpulse.ru & utm_mediu
m = link & utm_compaign = article

[Lopatov]

Quote: Severski

Technically, troops could always be removed from Moldova. And under Kuchma, and under Yushchenko, and under Yanukovych, and under Poroshenko.

Yeah ...
But then NATO would have lost the last excuse about adapting the CFE Treaty.
Well, after 2007 Russia it became simply not interesting.
Especially considering the possible casualties among the Russian military when attempting such an export.

[Severski]

It turns out NATO is guilty. ))))))))))
I haven’t heard a more stupid excuse for a long time


What, did NATO force Yanukovych?

[New Year day]

Quote: Lek38

This indicates a complete failure of foreign policy towards the nearest neighbors.

Is there any doubt? While Russia contained the closest neighbors, there was love. The freebie is over - love has passed

[verb]

This "UN" does not solve anything. The United States, for example, "pill" on it from a high bell tower. The UN has already outlived itself.

[Lekxnumx]

Quote: verb

This "UN" does not solve anything. The United States, for example, "pill" on it from a high bell tower. The UN has already outlived itself.

The UN was born dead thanks to the VETO law of the Security Council of Russia, USA, China, France, Great Britain.
This right was used by the USSR / Russia most of all until the 70-80s, then the position of the USSR strengthened and the United States began 80 times. Great Britain 32 times, France 16 times many were joint. China 11 times, often listens to the majority of the world.

[-Pollux]

Quote: Lek38

The UN was born dead thanks to the VETO law of the Security Council of Russia, USA, China, France, Great Britain.

Thanks to the right of veto not to happen the Third World War

[Felix]

Quote: demo

There are practically no countries left in the world that either would like to speak on our side, or would not be afraid to speak for us.

You know ... no allies are better than the ones that the allies feed them so far and who will run at the first serious threat.

[-Pollux]

Quote: Felix

You know ... no allies are better than the ones that the allies feed them so far and who will run at the first serious threat.

In the upcoming clash with China, the United States is counting on Russia's help ...

[lopvlad]

Quote: demo

There are practically no countries left in the world that either would like to speak on our side, or would not be afraid to speak for us.

in the world no one has friends. Here you are either a strong host country and vassals around you, or you are a weak country and everyone would like to spit on your opinion.
In the world, it’s not the UN resolutions that matter, but the power of the state with respect to which they are being adopted. So even if the resolution was adopted by the UN Security Council and not the General Assembly, nothing changes, no one will attack Russia while we have the army and nuclear weapons.

[Retvizan 8]

The resolution is not binding, that’s it.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Retvizan 8

The resolution is not binding, that’s it.

Now the Russian military in Transnistria does not have the status of “peacekeepers” and Moldova will demand their recognition as occupiers with all the ensuing economic consequences.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Puncher

Now the Russian military in Transnistria does not have the status of “peacekeepers” and Moldova will demand their recognition as occupiers with all the ensuing economic consequences.

Nonsense.

[solzh]

Just as our troops were peacekeeping in Transnistria, they will remain peacekeeping and will not go anywhere. To leave Transnistria means to betray the population of this unrecognized country.

[Pissarro]

The status of peacekeepers gives the Security Council, the General Assembly does not have Power. But can make some noise

[Severski]

The ugly people are these Moldovans.
Demand the withdrawal of Russian troops from Moldova?
How dare they?

[minus]

Yes, do not take into account Russia, then rather Ukraine has great rights in the territory of Transnistria, but not Moldova.

[Severski]

Well Duc, Moldova has more rights to Bujak than Ukraine.

[udincev]

Quote: Severski

Well Duc, Moldova has more rights to Bujak than Ukraine.

Well, Duc has more rights to Ukraine and Moldova than Bandera and Romania.

[Severski]

This is already from the field of demagogy. Well, like: Mongolia has even more rights to Russia

[Lopatov]

Quote: Severski

This is already from the field of demagogy. Well, like: Mongolia has even more rights to Russia

Let’s write it down, Ukraine or Moldova may have rights. The rights of Russia - from the field of demagogy.

[Severski]

Why so? :
Russia's rights to Transnistria are equivalent to the right of Mongolia to Russia.

[udincev]

Quote: Severski

Russian rights to Transnistria are equivalent to Mongolia’s right to Russia

... then we will bring your chain to its logical end: the rights of the Hitler Wehrmacht to Romania (together with Moldova) are equivalent to the right of Mongolia to Russia.
What we are discussing is well and accessible described in A. Zinoviev’s work “Crossroads” in the article “falsification of history”

[udincev]

Quote: Severski

This is already from the field of demagogy.

More from the field of history.
But Mongolia does not need to offend.

[-Pollux]

Quote: Severski

This is already from the field of demagogy.

Well, demagoguery is your everything. Peremptory statements are the weapon of a liar. Can you justify the "rights of the Mongols to Russia"?

[Pissarro]

Ukraine does not even have rights to the territory of Odessa and Kharkov, what relation do raguli have to the banks of the Dniester?

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Severski

The ugly people are these Moldovans.
Demand the withdrawal of Russian troops from Moldova?
How dare they?

And where does Moldova have to do, if only one person rules Moldova - Plahotniuc ... And through it - the US State Department. Ordinary Moldovans in their country have not solved anything for a long time.

[Severski]

Do you decide anything in Russia?

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Severski

Do you decide anything in Russia?

No, I don’t decide. ) That's why I voted for Grudinin in the elections. In order not to see with us all this liberal economic co-rule in power.

[bald]

Everything - not everything, and if ours leave - a bloody viper, there is provided. There are more than enough examples. You can’t leave at all - they’ve already left.

[Conductor]

How can I listen to a person with the last name Dodon?

[Pissarro]

Yes, the prefix "semi" is superfluous here.

[Severski]

Are there countries where Russians are offended, and they are not fascist?

[Pissarro]

Russia is not offended by the flawed fascists. The ushering fascist considers his farm as the priest of the earth and his tribe God-chosen. Such clowns massively bred on the ruins of civilization after the collapse of the Empire. There is also a second breed of clowns, religious fanatics. They are siblings of the Nazis, but they are not touched by the native farm, but by the words of a visiting sectarian.

[Severski]

Intrigued. Can I list the flawed fascists please?

[Pissarro]

In the parliaments of pseudo-state-limitrophs among the number of pro-European parties, look, there are all licensed fascist Russophobes

[Snail N9]

"The dog barks, the wind wears .... the caravan is coming." ... Here are the number of such UN resolutions regarding the withdrawal of its troops and the withdrawal from Arab lands occupied by Israel .... so what? Has anyone in Israel paid attention to these "resolutions"? Yes, they ignored them and will continue to ignore them, all the more so since their roof-USA directly said that they do not need the UN ....

[23rus]

The resolution is correct, it’s time to change the peacekeepers to regular troops.

[K-50]

It has long become the mouthpiece of American and other Western interests and does not place the interests of other countries, by the way, members of this UN itself.
That’s how all foreign countries will remove their military contingents from the places of conflict (interethnic, interconfessional, etc.), then Russia will CONSIDER this question, but not earlier.
In my opinion, the UN is playing a new card of neocolonialism.
Only here you can keep the troops in the places of their national and political interests, and no one else.

[The Siberian barber]

Laughing out loud!
"that Moscow" should not react to the initiative nervously. "Such a statement was made by the head of the republic’s Foreign Ministry, Tudor Ulyanovsky."
In any case, Moldova / Moldova, not even a pimple, is on the map!
"tea" / glass / cant ???
Rave...

[Severski]

Yes, Swan is a man.
By the way, where is he?

[Severski]

I give you another link that proves that you are a liar and a frivolous interlocutor.
As an interlocutor, you completely discredited yourself, and therefore, I do not want to communicate with you anymore.
I value my time too much and do not want to waste time on emptiness.



https://press.try.md/mobile_item.php?id=31611


Equipment for the disposal of weapons and ammunition, which has been inactive for more than a year in Moldova, can be sent to Iraq. Infotag was informed about this by sources in Tiraspol.
We are talking about the Luthe melting furnace and the Donovan detonation chamber, delivered to Moldova in April 2002 for use in the disposal of Russian ammunition with an expired shelf life. However, the authorities of the unrecognized Transnistrian republic refused to let this equipment into the territory they control, as a result of which it has been idle for almost 1,5 years in one of the warehouses near Chisinau.Lopatov,

[TsUS-Air Force]

But what about Russia? again worried and upset?

[skomfit]

They would rather advise the United States from Syria to dump them, unlike Russia (in Transnistria, we were asked to help) no one called at all.

[Altona]

Quote: bouncyhunter

Behind these bubbles, at least Romanian ears are visible.

------------------------------------
One word - Romanians. Now the peacekeepers have become different. Russian peacekeepers are wrong, and Western peacekeepers are right. Ukraine generally wants to place 30 thousand foreign "peacekeepers" with an expanded mandate. By the way, in Yugoslavia, no one intervened in the affairs of a foreign state? No one posted a “peacekeeping” contingent there? Something that Europeans' memory has become shorter than that of a butterfly.

[major147]

So what? Peacekeepers come out?

[23424636]

Moldova was allowed to walk and thump, and then the Romanians, embittered and not pacified, began to slowly poke NATO grandmothers on one or the other; I remember how Swan threatened Snegur to hang him on a pole, why did this drunkard Yelchin not give? He would have made Lebed the head of Bessarabia, but he got the cards wrong and locked up the army. 14 And now Rogozin was the representative of the GDP on Transnistria, was not afraid to call a spade a spade and was very embarrassed by this covetous thief in Kishenev. And so, they drove Dmitry into Baikonur and And who will deal with Transnistria - Borisov ?! Maybe Siluanov with Oreshkin and his dumb women. It’s funny, but in Russia there are very few figures reconciling the map of the country with the one that it occupied in 1914

[Sands Careers General]

This draft refers to Russia with a “demand for an unconditional and immediate withdrawal” of peacekeepers from Transnistria.

Banana them on the collar, not the withdrawal of the peacekeepers. Let them go hang out.

[Royalist]

The district that you bleat is called: "from a sore head to a fiddle"

[Normal ok]

Igor Dodon commented on the resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on Transnistria

Dodon, he's such a Dodon, however. No one asks him (because nothing depends on him), but he always speaks out.