Military Review

Thailand received another SSJ100 aircraft

39
On Tuesday, the third SSJ100 aircraft in the business version (SBJ) landed at Bangkok airport, reports bmpd.



The aircraft in the modification SSJ100-95SBJ has a serial number 95132 and is designed for the Royal Thai Air Force. He made his first flight in Komsomolsk-on-Amur in May 2017 of the year, after which he passed customization for about a year (individualization of the product to the order of a specific buyer) in Italy at the enterprise of SuperJet International (SJI).

The contract for the supply of the third aircraft was signed in December 2016 of the year. The cost of the transaction is not specified.

In the 2016 year, the Thai Air Force has already received two Sukhoi Business Jet (SBJ) in the VIP-configuration under the agreement concluded in the 2014 year.

All three ships are part of the 603 Squadron of the Sixth Aviation Wing. The aircraft were designated B.L18. and are intended to carry the country's leadership, as well as the high command of the Armed Forces of Thailand.



According to Sukhoi Civil Aircraft JSC (GSS), Thailand became the first foreign buyer of the business version of the SSJ100 aircraft.

The operators of this version in the Russian Federation are the special flight squad “Russia”, the airline RusJet, the flight squad EMERCOM of Russia and others.

In total, the SSJ10 100 aircraft in the business version are currently in operation (including Thailand).
Photos used:
Thai Air Force, Sukhoi Civil Aircraft JSC
39 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 20 June 2018 15: 20
    +14
    Thailand received another SSJ100 aircraft
    The Airbus to Iran has contracted hundreds of its airplanes, and we rejoice in EVERY new production and sale ... We have arrived. Our Ural Airlines has contracted the purchase of Boeing in the next 5-7 years, in addition to the existing Airbus, with NEW and full analogues to our MS-21. But they do not buy MS-21. How patriotic it is. Especially considering that in the Urals "Titanium Valley" Boeing decided to build another plant to produce the parts it needs from titanium
    And with such a “wise” and “wise” domestic policy of our “dearly beloved government”, which our President SO likes, we are already left without our airplanes on passenger air lines. It is sad and embarrassing to look at the flyradar, seeing what is happening in the skies of Europe and North America and how empty it is over our territory.
    1. hrych
      hrych 20 June 2018 15: 25
      +3
      Quote: svp67
      and how empty above our territory

      But it’s easier for our air defense laughing And the government, yes, lousy am
      1. Gargantua
        Gargantua 20 June 2018 15: 49
        +4
        Quote: hrych
        Quote: svp67
        and how empty above our territory

        But it’s easier for our air defense laughing And the government, yes, lousy am

        Already change your shoes? You told me the other day that the government has the right to everything that everyone who is dissatisfied must shut up, and the weak (pensioners, people with disabilities and the sick) must die in the name of prosperity for the ruling class?
        1. hrych
          hrych 20 June 2018 15: 51
          +4
          Wow.
          Quote: Gargantua
          dissatisfied should shut up and the weak (pensioners, disabled and sick) should die in the name of prosperity of the ruling class?

          Bring the screen, Miracle Worker wassat
          There are legal procedures, including recall of deputies, due to distrust. Pension reform is an opportunity to stop. Including appeal to the King. Call the deputies, here is September 9, ride edrosov in the elections. Create initiative groups of voters, and do not crap here to no purpose. Mitka’s resignations have all the possibilities.
          1. Gargantua
            Gargantua 20 June 2018 15: 58
            +1
            Quote: hrych
            Bring the screen, Miracle Worker

            Look in your comments from about March 18 to April 1.
            1. hrych
              hrych 20 June 2018 15: 59
              +5
              Quote: Gargantua
              Look in your comments from March 18 to about April 1.

              You need, you look wassat
          2. KLV2018
            KLV2018 21 June 2018 09: 34
            -1
            Quote: hrych
            Wow.
            Quote: Gargantua
            dissatisfied should shut up and the weak (pensioners, disabled and sick) should die in the name of prosperity of the ruling class?

            Bring the screen, Miracle Worker wassat
            There are legal procedures, including recall of deputies, due to distrust. Pension reform is an opportunity to stop. Including appeal to the King. Call the deputies, here is September 9, ride edrosov in the elections. Create initiative groups of voters, and do not crap here to no purpose. Mitka’s resignations have all the possibilities.

            What about Vovka?
            1. hrych
              hrych 21 June 2018 10: 38
              0
              Quote: KLV2018
              What about Vovka?

              He has foreign policy, and domestic, and defense. Mitka has only internal, other functions are in the competence of the Supreme. There are no complaints about foreign policy and defense, moreover, in history it is already possible to write in gold letters. According to domestic policy, claims to national (guest workers, again minorities have more rights) and social (there is an approach to retirement age) policies. There are no complaints about megaprojects, such as the Vladivostok and Crimea bridges, megastrocks to the Football World Cup, Olympic Sochi, the APEC Summit in Vladivostok (Russky Island was built in addition to 3 bridges), Vostochny Cosmodrome, etc. Finally, agriculture has become self-sufficient, food security has increased, and agricultural exports have exceeded agricultural exports. defense industry export, and this is the 2nd place and a quarter of the market. Therefore, Medvedev took part in these achievements, but climbed into the social sphere, the issue of Gaster is also not being resolved, which increases crime, does not stabilize the labor market and which leads to problems of the pension fund, and Gaster does not form it. This is done for mega-projects in order to reduce labor costs and find a sufficient number of robots, this is done so that Central Asian sub-states do not collapse from an unsettled and impoverished population. In addition to the arms race, Russia is waging two wars, which is not cheap. But they decided to plug the holes at the expense of the Russian people, this is a criminal mistake and is fraught with a social explosion. Also, people lived better and better, and here they will have to plow longer, which is a deterioration in life, and a significant one. Therefore, the merits of the Medvedev cabinet cannot be denied, but it is unacceptable to take this step. Therefore, the Supreme Office needs to be changed unambiguously. The supreme is elected, the supreme corresponds and even more. Nobody has canceled the correction of domestic policy, and a cabinet change is the normal method of work of the state if the cabinet leads to a social explosion. There are legal methods of voters, put in place edrosov. The main stability in society and the growth of wealth. And you, the Ukrainians, on the contrary, need a social explosion in the Russian Federation, we don’t.
    2. Gargantua
      Gargantua 20 June 2018 15: 35
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      But they don’t buy MS-21

      And they will not buy. If it was a completely domestic aircraft, then there would be some sense in the event of the introduction of a complete sanction ban on the supply of aircraft parts to Russia. Spare parts for Watermelons and Bobiks can be found all over the world in the secondary market, you will not take them anywhere on the dry market, in which case. In fact, there are a lot of reasons why airlines do not take dry ones: unreliability, poor service, high price, etc.
      1. svp67
        svp67 20 June 2018 15: 37
        +5
        Quote: Gargantua
        for which airlines do not take dry, a lot: unreliability, poor service, high price, etc.

        The main reason is the absence of normal leasing programs for this aircraft, and here the role of the State, which we are concerned about other issues, is very important
        1. Gargantua
          Gargantua 20 June 2018 15: 42
          +3
          Quote: svp67
          The main reason is the absence of normal leasing programs for this aircraft, and here the role of the State, which we are concerned about other issues, is very important

          The state has already swollen so much money on this plane that it cannot be counted. GSS, for a minute, still have not reached breakeven production. Guess who covers these costs? Still need to remember about the completely domestic Tu-334 project buried thanks to the SSJ lobby.
          1. svp67
            svp67 20 June 2018 15: 45
            +3
            Quote: Gargantua
            Guess who covers these costs?

            Wangyu: "PENSIONERS"
          2. Stas157
            Stas157 20 June 2018 17: 01
            +5
            Quote: Gargantua
            GSS, for a minute, still have not reached breakeven production.


            Over the past two years, the SCA has dramatically improved its financial performance and has virtually climbed out of the crisis. The company's revenue last year increased by a third, up to 55 billion rubles. At the same time, the loss almost tripled, now it is about a billion rubles.
            SSJ is still the first Russian aircraft, and I think it is very successful, despite the presence of many problems, without it there would be no next step for the MS-21. Not everyone succeeds in this first step, for example, the Chinese ARJ21.
          3. dmmyak40
            dmmyak40 20 June 2018 23: 20
            0
            The Tu-334, unfortunately, is outdated even at the design stage, since the electronics, navigation and flight equipment no longer met the requirements of the airlines. Well, who will buy a plane with a crew of 3 people, when everyone has been flying for 2 years. I worry about our aircraft myself, but things need to be looked soberly.
    3. d ^ Amir
      d ^ Amir 20 June 2018 15: 44
      0
      but what about this news ???? "Airbus may not fulfill the contract with Iran due to US sanctions, media reported."
      https://ria.ru/world/20180615/1522808440.html
      1. svp67
        svp67 20 June 2018 15: 49
        0
        Quote: d ^ Amir
        but what about this news ????

        Quite normal. The same sanctions will hit our SuperJet, if that ... there is a lot of American
    4. Muvka
      Muvka 20 June 2018 15: 47
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      Thailand received another SSJ100 aircraft
      The Airbus to Iran has contracted hundreds of its airplanes, and we rejoice in EVERY new production and sale ... We have arrived. Our Ural Airlines has contracted the purchase of Boeing in the next 5-7 years, in addition to the existing Airbus, with NEW and full analogues to our MS-21. But they do not buy MS-21. How patriotic it is. Especially considering that in the Urals "Titanium Valley" Boeing decided to build another plant to produce the parts it needs from titanium
      And with such a “wise” and “wise” domestic policy of our “dearly beloved government”, which our President SO likes, we are already left without our airplanes on passenger air lines. It is sad and embarrassing to look at the flyradar, seeing what is happening in the skies of Europe and North America and how empty it is over our territory.

      Actually, the news is not that they sold another plane. After all, they don’t write when Aeroflot buys or Mexico. The thing is that the government bought the planes. And not just an airline. Ural Airlines is buying because the MS-21 is not yet available and will initially be delivered to those who previously ordered it. And airlines need airplanes. And they cannot wait 7-8 years. Iran buys because there is no choice. They do not need short-range aircraft.
      1. SSR
        SSR 20 June 2018 16: 58
        0
        Quote: Muvka
        Iran buys because there is no choice. They don't need short-range planes

        + but Iran plays its game even after DAM threw their S-300, they seriously revised our “basket”.
    5. Fungus
      Fungus 20 June 2018 15: 49
      -1
      Why are you crying?
    6. tol100v
      tol100v 20 June 2018 16: 09
      0
      Quote: svp67
      and how empty over our territory.

      And how empty in our pockets. Even Flytradar-24 knows about this! Without strong-willed decisions, this question cannot be pushed around!
    7. Muvka
      Muvka 20 June 2018 16: 11
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      Thailand received another SSJ100 aircraft
      The Airbus to Iran has contracted hundreds of its airplanes, and we rejoice in EVERY new production and sale ... We have arrived. Our Ural Airlines has contracted the purchase of Boeing in the next 5-7 years, in addition to the existing Airbus, with NEW and full analogues to our MS-21. But they do not buy MS-21. How patriotic it is. Especially considering that in the Urals "Titanium Valley" Boeing decided to build another plant to produce the parts it needs from titanium
      And with such a “wise” and “wise” domestic policy of our “dearly beloved government”, which our President SO likes, we are already left without our airplanes on passenger air lines. It is sad and embarrassing to look at the flyradar, seeing what is happening in the skies of Europe and North America and how empty it is over our territory.

      About the flyradar. Do you know how it works? In order for airplanes to show, you need to install special devices that communicate with transponders and send information to the flytradar server. Are you sure that they are with us all over the country? And yet, about 600 million people live in Europe. And in Russia, 150. i.e. 4 times more. Now divide the European traffic by 4 and compare again.
      1. svp67
        svp67 20 June 2018 16: 19
        +1
        Quote: Muvka
        Now divide the European traffic by 4 and compare again.

        Share ....
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 20 June 2018 16: 21
          +1
          All the same. Notice. There is not a single aircraft above the Urals and beyond Siberia. Suggest why? Or guess yourself? Although over the European part of the country from that side, many planes fly. Now take what flies west and north of the Urals and copy several times to all of Siberia. And multiply by 4. If you do not know how the system works, do not panic.
          1. svp67
            svp67 20 June 2018 16: 30
            +1
            Quote: Muvka
            There is not a single aircraft above the Urals and beyond Siberia.

            Apparently because we do not have Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, Kamchatka or Sakhalin. Did I understand you correctly?
            Quote: Muvka
            Now take what flies west and north of the Urals and copy several times to all of Siberia.

            If you like "pulling an owl on a globe", then you can do it with BIG PROFESSIONALISM.
            Quote: Muvka
            And multiply by 4. If you do not know how the system works, do not panic.

            Yeah, we’d go with our “tips” to sweep airfields further. Do you see traffic over the oceans and desert? Whose territory is there, these planes in whose piggy bank to add? Or did you immediately multiply them by "0"? If you are trying to be "holier than the Pope," then you are in vain. Previously, our planes flew to each district center, and clearly on schedule, but now where is the schedule? Although the airfields remained ...
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 20 June 2018 16: 46
              +1
              Apparently because we do not have Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, Kamchatka or Sakhalin. Did I understand you correctly?

              But where did so many planes come from west of the Urals? Tell me. Did they come from nowhere? Why are there not one or two, but more than a dozen? But I see that I'm talking to a stubborn person who does not want to see the facts.
              1. svp67
                svp67 20 June 2018 16: 52
                0
                Quote: Muvka
                But where did so many planes come from west of the Urals?

                And east of the Urals, we understand there are NO lands and cities
                Quote: Muvka
                Why are there not one or two, but more than a dozen?

                I will say why, because in order to fly to Perm, Omsk, Salekhard, and anywhere, it is easier and faster to fly THROUGH Moscow from Yekaterinburg. That's where we got at least some kind of traffic from.
                Quote: Muvka
                But I see that I'm talking to a stubborn person who does not want to see the facts.

                An interesting accusation of others in their errors. Do you even understand what country we live in. What is its length from east to west? And who can explain to me WHAT is it done that tickets abroad are CHEAPER inside Russian? Do we have the richest population? Does it have the ability to ride a bike from end to end?
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 20 June 2018 15: 20
    +13
    Yesterday I literally flew home with the CHM to SUPERGET. And there is nothing to compare. Before Moscow on the Boeing and from Vnukovo already on Sukhoi. And the comparisons are not in favor of the American! Ours is quieter. The distance between the seats is greater. With my height (1.80) I rested in Boeing knees in the dry, even a free place is. It is clear that the American is older, but! Our only learn to make civilian aircraft! And I hope this is not the latest development of a civilian aircraft KB Sukhoi! BRAVO !!!
    1. MPN
      MPN 20 June 2018 15: 34
      +9
      It's nice to hear something about our planes besides slops. good drinks hi
      1. svp67
        svp67 20 June 2018 15: 41
        0
        Quote: MPN
        It's nice to hear something about our planes besides slops.

        Well, I'll add, about the plane. The same Ural Airlines sent a commission to evaluate the Sukhoi SD. The plane LIKED, but, for him there are no normal leasing offers. It is frankly ROAD, in comparison with the aircraft of Boeing and Airbus and even Bombardier
        1. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 20 June 2018 16: 43
          0
          Well, Boeings and Airbases do not produce short-range aircraft; here, most likely, the competitors are the same Bombardier and Embraers
    2. Yeraz
      Yeraz 20 June 2018 15: 41
      +2
      Quote: Magic Archer
      To Moscow on a Boeing and from Vnukovo to Sukhoi. And comparisons are not in favor of the American!

      here it is necessary to take into account the range of Boeing and Airbus is large, on which model of production of what year and in what configuration you flew ???
      I also flew Airbus Aeroflot and Airbus Azal (Azerbaijan Airlines). The difference for the passenger is huge, since Aeroflot ordering is conditionally BASIC version, and Azal is fully equipped. I even thought if this is the plane.
      I’m not saying that the MS is bad, I didn’t fly it, I just want a full picture of the comparison.
    3. Fedoslov
      Fedoslov 20 June 2018 16: 17
      +2
      So I still would not like it, there in the superjet a significant part of the elements are not of domestic development and production, but foreign.
      And more news: Apple has accumulated $ 267 billion of free cash. More than the cost of all the largest oil and gas companies in Russia:
      Rosneft - $ 66 billion
      Lukoil - $ 55 billion
      Gazprom - $ 53 billion
      Novatek - $ 38 billion
      Gazprom Neft - $ 23 billion
      Tatneft - $ 23 billion

      By the way, Apple has more money than Russia's annual budget ($ 245 billion).
      1. Fungus
        Fungus 20 June 2018 16: 32
        -1
        And where is Apple? If the article is about a plane.
        1. Chicha squad
          Chicha squad 20 June 2018 16: 37
          0
          What does a civilian airplane have to do with a military review site?
          1. Stirbjorn
            Stirbjorn 20 June 2018 16: 46
            +3
            Quote: Chicha Squad
            What does a civilian airplane have to do with a military review site?
            aircraft for thai air force
          2. Fungus
            Fungus 20 June 2018 17: 18
            0
            Moreover, you need to wear glasses and read the full article!
  3. san4es
    san4es 20 June 2018 15: 25
    +2
    Thailand received another SSJ100 aircraft

    hi Length: 29,94 m.
    Height: 10,28 m.
    Wingspan: 27,80 m.
    Cruising speed: 830 km / h (0,78M).
    Maximum speed: 860 km / h (0,81M).
    Flight range: 3048 km (for SuperJet100-95LR 4578 kilometers).
    Ceiling: 12200 m (FL 400 level).
    Takeoff run: 1731 m. (For SuperJet100-95LR 2052 meters).
    Number of seats: 98 people in the basic layout.
    Crew: 3 person (flight attendants and two pilots).
    Maximum landing weight: 41000 kg.
    Powerplant: SaM146 - 1S17 (two instances) (for SuperJet100-95LR SaM146 - 1S18 (two instances)).
    The diameter of the fuselage: 3,24 meters;
    Wing area: 77 sq.m.
    Passenger doors: 4 pieces.
    The volume of baggage compartments: 21,7 cub
    Takeoff gross weight: 45880 kg (for SuperJet100-95LR 49450 kg);
    Paid load: 12245 kg.
    Empty weight kg 24250.
    Weight of fuel in the tanks: 15805 l.
    Power assist installation: Honeywell RE220.
    path length: 1630 m.
  4. Krev
    Krev 20 June 2018 15: 51
    0
    Quote: svp67
    which is so like our President

    I have never seen him like it!
  5. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 20 June 2018 16: 51
    +2
    I will be glad for once for our industry. The Asian market is promising, and the operation of 3 Superjets by the royal family of Thailand is a good advertisement!