Another class destroyer Arleigh Burke transferred to the US Navy.

The US Navy received another Arleigh Burke class destroyer. Shipbuilding company Bath Iron Works 15 June 2018 of the year solemnly handed over to the US Navy a new missile destroyer USS "Thomas Hudner" (DDG-116), the press service of the US Department of Defense said.

According to the report, this destroyer “Thomas Hudner” (DDG-116) is the 66-m destroyer of the Arleigh Burke class, as well as the fourth type of Flight IIA, which were transferred to the US Navy. The ship was laid in 2013 year, launched in May 2017 year, and in early May of this year completed acceptance tests.

Key Features: Displacement at full load 9217 tons. The length of 156 meters, width 20 meters, draft 10 meters. The speed of the 31 node. Four General Electric LM2500-30 gas turbines with a total power of 75000 kW (100000 hp) have been installed. The total crew will be 380 people.

The ship is able to perform various missions and tasks of a defensive and offensive nature thanks to the unified Aegis system.

Armament:
Tomahawk cruise missiles, RIM-66 SM-2 "Standard-2" SAM, anti-submarine guided missile (PLUR) RUM-139 ASROC
Artillery 1 * 1 127 mm. AU Mark 45. Mod. 3 / 54 cal., 680 shells
Missile armament up to 74 of SM-2 or SM-3 missiles at the Aegis Mark 41, 24 RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles
Anti-submarine armament PLUR RUM-139 ASROC
Mine-torpedo armament 2 × 3 324-mm torpedo tubes Mark 32 (6 torpedoes Mark 46 or Mark 50)
Aviation group 2 helicopters SH-60 LAMPS

Comments

[victorsh]

It's a shame for us. Honestly.

[Muvka]

Quote: victorsh

It's a shame for us. Honestly.

How many new intercontinental ballistic missiles were on duty this year? Doesn’t it hurt for them?

[maxim947]

It's a shame for us. Honestly.

Come on! don't whimper! First of all, we don’t need as many of them, secondly, as many as we need (also not), and thirdly, we will still have ships, be patient.

[spektr9]

Apart from the oligarchs, we don’t need anything

we will still have ships, be patient

No, it will not

[Serg65]

Quote: spektr9

Apart from the oligarchs, we don’t need anything

My friend, let’s you and your friends arrange Perestroika in the USA, end it with some kind of Illinois agreement (like Belovezhsky), and exactly in 27 years we will compare the fleets of the USA and Russia !!! In my opinion the right decision, how are you?

[spektr9]

Dear friend, but I didn’t do perestroika in the Russian Federation, I don’t do it in the USA either

[Serg65]

Quote: spektr9

I didn’t do perestroika in the Russian Federation, I don’t do it in the USA either

Yes Yes!!!!

[MPN]

is the 66th Arleigh Burke class destroyer,

Everyone builds, builds .... but they are all few, few ....

[Fungus]

More for crying then

[A good one]

Now run-in to the Black Sea.

[victorsh]

I understand that in Kazakhstan they build more ships than in Russia. Yes, they go from Russia to Kazakhstan to earn money, and not vice versa. I looked at the statistics on how many ships were built in ships before the 14 year and now (they didn’t steal then less). And I forgot how to "cry" in the army (). I kept everything in myself. As a result, I got a stroke. Glory to GOD.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Sharpening axes over a hill ... Tired of ... And 74 missiles - these will not be "Standards" these will be the Tomahawks, will also be on Japanese ships, twin brothers of this next American ship of the Arly Burke project ...

[izja]

Quote: Muvka

Quote: victorsh

It's a shame for us. Honestly.

How many new intercontinental ballistic missiles were on duty this year? Doesn’t it hurt for them?

On what duty, they have all been deployed for a long time in the right quantities, and another concept of the Triad, unlike Russia, meanwhile, Russia is scary with buoys in the Mediterranean Sea Gary Truman: 0 (Naked ass hedgehog).

[Nasrat]

And thank God! The main thing that they should know is that the answer will fly ... and let them measure with the Chinese in the number of ships!

[rocket757]

We cannot measure them with h-h-h-fleets, so we will keep the nuclear alert ready.
Let it be for now. Not the best option, but not hopeless!

[Alexander War]

The “Thundering” corvette will be tested with anti-ship Onyxes
https://vpk-news.ru/news/43059

[Alexander War]

For Gary Truman and Arly Berkov there is Varshavyanka

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

How many Varshavyanka do we have against 66 Arly Berks and 22 Tikanderog?

By the way, do you think they have something against submarines? I think there are quite a few ...

This serious force is preparing against us and we must reckon with it, prepare countermeasures, and not scream that we will demolish them with Buyanami-M and Varshavyanki given that they have cruisers and destroyers ten times more than we have MRCs and submarines ...

[Alexander War]

By the way, do you think they have something against submarines? They have good MK-48 torpedoes. The main thing here is who will find someone faster!

[Serg65]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

rather than screaming that we’ll demolish them with Buyanami-M and Varshavyanka given that they have cruisers and destroyers ten times more than we have MRCs and submarines ...

So you think that the war between the USA and Russia will be exclusively at sea ??

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

No, of course, the sea is one of the borders, and it must also be kept ...

[t-4]

Quote: Alexander War

For Gary Truman and Arly Berkov there is Varshavyanka

Well, how many hundreds of Varshavyanks will need to flood 66 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 10 aircraft carriers?
I think about the same as the Ukrainians will need their rubber boats, what would they put to the bottom of the Black Sea Fleet. Not less.

[Alexander War]

It was about the Mediterranean Sea!

[Alexander War]

A Th not at mov? Che for shame!

[A good one]

Quote: Alexander War

A Th not at mov? Che for shame!

He thinks a Jew can hold out longer.

[Serg65]

Izya, I'm wildly sorry, but how about this?

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Okay ... The destroyer project "Leader" is being developed, we have already made a model ...

But seriously, I’m now upgrading the Zvezda for the construction of large ships, rolling in a nuclear installation on new icebreakers, testing new weapons systems on the new project 22350 frigates and starting the Leaders oven like hotcakes ...

Oh, to have time ...

[Alexander War]

I doubt about the Leaders, frigates pr 22350 haven’t accepted yet! Moreover, Shoigu said that frigates pr 22350 even like 22350M will be the base of the surface fleet, although they didn’t even show their model

[A good one]

Eh Izya, Izya, what words and expressions, such and upbringing. They found an outlet in their holidays and would have expressed themselves.

[forty-eighth]

66 Arly Berkov for 30 years. Not bad Yankees stamp.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

+ 22 more cruisers with the Tikanderog URO, 122 “Tomahawk” on each ...

66 (Arly Burka) * 74 "Tamogavka" + 22 (Tikanderoga) * 122 = 4884 + 2684 = 7568 "Tomahawks" The USA can bring to our shores and strike them at a distance of 2500 km + the "missile defense" system consisting of the same launchers Sea-based installations MK.41 along the perimeter of our country + Japan (US vassal) has 29 destroyers which also have MK.41 installations ...

At the beginning of the 20th century in the 20s, the United States and Japan jointly participated in the occupation of the Russian Far East during the period of foreign intervention ... History repeats itself and punishes those who do not learn its lessons ...

I hope our destroyers "Leaders" will also soon begin to produce and strengthen the submarine fleet in order to keep these "partners" in the sight of our "Caliber" ...

[Dikson]

Now hurray-patriots, who can’t count, will bite you ..) Recently, most of them think that they will drown half of the American fleet with “Dagger” .. and “Daggers” - as many as ten! - it means there’s nothing to worry about ..

[Wendigo]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

I hope our destroyers "Leaders" will also soon begin to produce and strengthen the submarine fleet

Just keep in mind that the recent spike in gas prices, an increase in VAT, and most importantly an increase in the retirement threshold, is the price. Rather, the payment for what already exists ... And for your hopes, we all will have to “fork out” additionally.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Don’t whine, the retirement age is being increased due to the fact that our number of pensioners is growing, and the number of working citizens is decreasing ...

we already pay the market price for gas, it’s just not fair right now, since you give away 45 rubles at a gas station, and the rest is paid to you at the expense of teachers, roads and other budgetary expenses, because all of them will be underpaid due to the fact that our fuel prices are not market, but subsidized by budgets, and now, prices have stabilized by reducing excise taxes by 1000-2000 rubles per tonne, that is, now budgets will not receive the planned revenues and will reduce spending ... Is that fair? What do you subsidize gasoline at the expense of those who do not even have the opportunity to buy a car ...

Because of such whiners like you, in Russia budgets will not be available to state employees and the fuel market is not developing, because the margin of the gas station network is close to zero, Lukoil even intended to close about 160 gas stations ...

In another Russia, where the fuel market was a market and the domestic market would develop and more would give taxes primarily to local budgets, which would raise the level of salaries of teachers and other state employees, and this would draw incomes in the private sector ...

Yes, they wouldn’t become richer, but the system would become simpler and more efficient, whoever refueles more - pays more, and now who has the most tanks and who refueles more often — the more he receives subsidies, for even doctors, roads and others budget items ...

[Wendigo]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

they increase the retirement age due to the fact that our number of pensioners is growing, and the number of working citizens is decreasing ...

Retirement age is raised due to the fact that the state does not have enough money to pay pensions.
"Getting up from their knees" in Syria and Ukraine cost a lot of money. The sanctions imposed for this by the West are worth even more money. Moreover, losses from them are gradually increasing like a snowball. Where did the "laughing iskanders" go?

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

for gas, we already pay the market price,

The market price is paid, for example, in America, Canada, Europe or even China ... But in Russia they have never even seen what it is at all ... the market price. In Russia, they always paid a monopoly price.

[donavi49]

Well, they still took a break - when the budgets were cut and the shipbuilding program was dismantled into a fleet maintenance program.
The result after the 12 of the year Burke did not build the 3 of the year - the first was surrendered only to 2017 (in total, there was a gap between the surrender of the hole in 5).

Now they are being measured with the Revived Fleet of Zheng He. There, too, destroyers rivet in huge series. Intensively catching up with the United States in quantity and overtaking the contracted.

[Serg65]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

History repeats itself and punishes those who do not learn its lessons ...

I ... I don’t understand how the story repeats ?? The Revolution is coming, and after it a civil war with foreign occupation of some parts of the country ????

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Quite possible...

[Dikson]

The occupation is "polite" already in progress .. In areas adjacent to China .. With the permission of our government .. for 20 years already .. Small commodity railway stations in Siberia, through front people, have long belonged to our Chinese friends .. annual huge forest fires in the taiga - it’s also their business .. - out of thin air, without licenses and contracts, under “sanitary” felling, the Siberian taiga is exported to China, burnt villages and villages are populated by the Chinese .. all is well - because Russia is what is beyond the Urals and closer to Moscow ..

[Vadim237]

They still want to build seven arsenal ships, with Mk 41 launchers for 560 missiles each - based on the San Antonio BDK.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

What kind of beast is this? And can he launch rockets and charge other ships?

[Fungus]

Pile of scrap metal for MRK with caliber. There is no sense in building such colossus. If the small ships smash them to pieces.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

You generally know that this destroyer also has air defense, and in several levels of protection and a radar station that may be the first to detect MRK and the destroyer will strike first with the same “Tomahawk” or “Harpoon” ...

RTOs have only 8 Caliber type missiles, 16 anti-aircraft missiles and a pair of 30-mm cannons, and this Erly Burke can charge 74 Tomahawks and 8 Harpoons and costs 24 anti-aircraft missiles + 2 * 30-mm quick-fire guns. ..

A salvo of missiles from a destroyer doesn’t reflect MRKs, even if you were at least seven spans in the forehead ...

[Hariton laptev]

as far as I know, calibers do not work on moving targets, but there will be only standing (Dostoevsky’s novel has this word) when you fly aboard.

[forty-eighth]

Gauges are also in anti-ship performance, but in combat conditions only modifications against fixed targets were used.

[voyaka uh]

The caliber in the RCC variant flies, unlike the usual one,
on 300-500 km

[forty-eighth]

These are the details. The raisin was in the fact that the comrade above wrote that the Caliber does not work on moving targets, while there are modifications for hitting moving targets, in particular ships.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Quote: voyaka uh

The caliber in the RCC variant flies, unlike the usual one,
on 300-500 km

They thought so of the ordinary, too, until the Buyans-M did not shoot them from the Caspian Sea at the ISIS militant bases in Syria))) ...

More than sure that the "Caliber" and in the version of RCC flies much more than 500 km ...

[rocket757]

Anti-ship should work on standing goals ??? For the first time I hear this.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Quote: Hariton Laptev

as far as I know, calibers do not work on moving targets, but there will be only standing (Dostoevsky’s novel has this word) when you fly aboard.

I think in the USA not all fools are well aware of the conditions under which they will have to conduct a naval battle, but there are many modifications of the Tomahawks and this missile is also constantly being improved ... I think there is an option as anti-ship ...

The MK.41 launcher is universal, loaded another box and you have anti-aircraft defense, loaded another tactical missile with a 2500 km nuclear warhead, made a new missile, just put it on the launcher and you have a missile defense system which nobody knows and never saw...

Well done, well thought out ... The main thing is how PR carried out the deployment of tactical missiles around the perimeter of Russia - like this is a missile defense, but who will be against it, more than sure that 99,99 people in the West do not understand that this is actually a system? Ijes "is not a missile defense, but a system of tactical missiles, designed for a massive global strike ...

Let’s take a damn how great it was, salvo with tactical missiles - while they fly and hit targets in Russia, they reload to the “Standards” and prepare to repel a retaliatory strike ...

Yes, we will have few chances, in general, as always ... We will survive nothing ... There is still time ... We are working brothers ...

[Serg65]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

how cool they did, a volley of tactical missiles - while they fly and hit targets in Russia, they reload to the "Standards" and prepare to repel a retaliatory strike.

You are probably leading a department at the General Staff Academy?

[Serg65]

Quote: Fungus

Pile of scrap metal for MRK with caliber. There is no sense in building such colossus. If the small ships smash them to pieces.

Great idea, you know! Yes, and MRK do not need to build, you can get by with a barge!

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Why barge? Send one diver with a mine, he and the aircraft carrier will sink to the bottom, not that some sort of destroyer ...

Moreover, it’s not in our northern seas to swim, it’s usually warm at American bases, dive, put mines and buzz)))

[Faceless]

I hope that my century is enough to live up to those glorious times when our Navy will also receive 66 destroyers (let’s dream of nuclear-powered destroyers comparable to cruisers) for guarding 10 heavy aircraft carriers. As a result of the death of the USSR, the fleet suffered more than other components of our armed forces. And to revive it is one of the most difficult and expensive tasks.

[spektr9]

If you can survive until the year 3000, then maybe ....

[izja]

Quote: Fungus

Pile of scrap metal for MRK with caliber. There is no sense in building such colossus. If the small ships smash them to pieces.

And I am writing about this. There is a dry cargo ship in the Black Sea. Ashot drowned a warship: 0 why do you need destroyers

[GEV67]

You can only envy. And take note. I hope this fact will spur our leadership towards the normal leadership of the country, and not the fight against pensioners.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Enough of flogging nonsense about the fight against pensioners ... Take a look at the budget of the pension fund, there is a deficit every year of 200-500 billion rubles a year, which is covered by transfers from the federal budget !!!

In our country, 42 million pensioners and a total of 72 million workers, already less than 1 in 2 !!! Multiply your contributions to the pension fund by 2 - this is the old man’s real pension ... Small pensions are not due to the government, but because we are transferring young and working LITTLE to the RF PF, simply because we are getting fewer and less, and more and more pensioners !!!

Raising the retirement age is bad, but there is no other way out !!!

[spektr9]

Yes, yes, but the fact that our government has one documentary income of 50 million a month does not play a role, about the state of officials, you probably should be modestly silent

Raising the retirement age is bad, but there is no other way out !!!

There is a physical destruction of the oligarchy and those who support them (do you understand whom I'm hinting at?)

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

You would at least look at the budget of the pension background for 2018 and its size, and then you would shout about 50 million rubles ...

The budget of the Russian Pension Fund for 2018 is 7,15 trillion rubles !!! It’s like half the federal budget ...

And what do you think the government should work for free? The salary of a trucker in Russia goes under 100 rubles and more, how much do you think the minister should receive while living in Moscow? Can still work for free?

Pensions in Russia are paid to old people by those who now work in white, part of their income is 22%, and tranches from the budget are a necessary measure to cover the deficit, which, if not implemented, will only increase and increase and will result in more serious consequences for everyone. ..

And we need to build ships, because when we cost ourselves something, even if a lot of money is allocated for it, in fact they go to our workers and engineers, to our enterprises and they all pay taxes to our own budget ... And all of this only well ... The country has strengthened its defense, people get paid, enterprises received an order and due to this they will modernize and, for example, the Far Eastern Zvezda plant will also produce civilian vessels, for example large tankers with a displacement of 250 tons !!!

Or what do you think is more correct to buy the same tankers abroad, like everything else from cowards to machine tools ?!

[Serg65]

Quote: spektr9

about the state of officials, so generally you probably need to be modestly silent

And let's talk about the state of those who finance the fight against raising pensions? Here you are, my friend, what do you do in life, well, except write anti-government comments on the sites ???

[GEV67]

For your information, I’m 50 and I’ve been working with 14 for years, so you are rubbish.

[Serg65]

Quote: GEV67

For your information, I’m 50 and I’ve been working with 14 for years, so you are rubbish.

Well, I’m three years older than you and I have been working the same way for 14 years, so what?

[Dikson]

you would meet in a shady square, but hack into chess, men ...)))

[Serg65]

Backgammon! With pleasure!

[Serg65]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

Enough nonsense is already flogging about the fight against retirees

God did not deprive you of sanity!

[Dikson]

66X74 ... There will not be enough C400, no available submarines and Bastions, in piece form .. And the cheers-patriotic screams about RTOs are out of place here .. It's sad. And the condition of our fleets and the number of pennants on them can only cause delight and a wave of positive emotions in a sick person .. Russia is a great sea power with access to three of the four oceans ...

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

+ 120 * 22 Tikanderog cruiser ...

But this is not a reason to whine ... Whatever the situation, we will fight !!! In the meantime, there is time to work, pay taxes, forge our "Shield" and our "Sword" ...

Even 15 years ago, there was no question of building new ships, today we are stamping Corvettes and Frigates, tomorrow there will be destroyers.

While there is time ...

[Dikson]

We stamp ersatz .. It looks more like a Volkssturm program than a real job .. If you understand .. It's a feverish search for at least some kind of counterbalance, even in the form of RTOs, Klubov, the devil knows what else .. I hate cheers and patriotism I equate it with provocation and obvious sabotage ... "We will fight .." Yes .. Of course we will .. But our entire professional army and navy will cease to exist within a few hours .. Who will fight? sofa cheers quack? Learn military affairs - really! ... Specialists will be beaten out first .. - and the youth, who thinks that joining the army _ this is a bastard and sucker - stupidly they will not be able to reload the machine .. So with whom are you going to attack? Who in the second wave will land in the MiG-31 to stick the ever-memorable "Dagger" on board the next aircraft carrier? One thing pleases me, an old man, in this situation: They will not be a naughty thing in the Far North, in my native Siberia ..- there, the entire periodic table lies .. - It's like with Syria - you fight there, with whom you want, and we while we clean up the oil wells ..)) And let them bomb Moscow .. - there is something to answer .. And for some reason it seems that they won’t answer at all - our deputies and ministers, with their children and houses abroad will sell us faster, how do we find out about this ... And if I have to - I won’t look at age, I’ll take a gun and at least one, but I will fill up .. from old memory ..

[Altona]

Quote: Wendigo

Just keep in mind that the recent spike in gas prices, an increase in VAT, and most importantly an increase in the retirement threshold, is the price. Rather, the payment for what already exists ... And for your hopes, we all will have to “fork out” additionally.

----------------------------
This is not the price to pay. The Ministry of Defense has already allocated money for rearmament. Or do you want to pay twice for the same thing? The capitalist state seeks to throw off social spending on citizens in order to serve only the ruling class.

[Alexander War]

19 trillion for rearmament!

[Butchcassidy]

Whatever you say, a new warship is always beautiful.

[Xscorpion]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

+ 22 more cruisers with the Tikanderog URO, 122 “Tomahawk” on each ...

66 (Arly Burka) * 74 "Tamogavka" + 22 (Tikanderoga) * 122 = 4884 + 2684 = 7568 "Tomahawks" The USA can bring to our shores and strike them at a distance of 2500 km + the "missile defense" system consisting of the same launchers Sea-based installations MK.41 along the perimeter of our country + Japan (US vassal) has 29 destroyers which also have MK.41 installations ...

At the beginning of the 20th century in the 20s, the United States and Japan jointly participated in the occupation of the Russian Far East during the period of foreign intervention ... History repeats itself and punishes those who do not learn its lessons ...

I hope our destroyers "Leaders" will also soon begin to produce and strengthen the submarine fleet in order to keep these "partners" in the sight of our "Caliber" ...

Yes, they don’t have so many tomahawks. They haven’t released so many in the entire history of their existence. In addition, Burke’s standard load is 8 tomahawks, and Ticonderogs are 24 tomahawks. You can certainly load more, but to the detriment of air defense and PLO. In your opinion, they will load all with Tomahawks But our missiles and torpedoes will be knocked off with caps? It is not yet known how many of these tomahawks will reach the targets, we also have air defense on the shore, but their fleet will heroically go under water after this salvo.

Quote: Serg65

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

how cool they did, a volley of tactical missiles - while they fly and hit targets in Russia, they reload to the "Standards" and prepare to repel a retaliatory strike.

You are probably leading a department at the General Staff Academy?

Anyway. I’m not sure about the reloading in ports.