Kiev demanded from the court to speed up the consideration of the dispute with Gazprom

32
The Ukrainian side submitted to the Swedish court of appeal a statement in which it demands that Gazprom’s appeal be accelerated against the decision of the arbitration on a dispute with Naftogaz, reports RIA News.





Recently, the Court of Appeal of Svea County (Sweden) granted the petition of a Russian company and suspended the execution of the February 28 decision on the contract for the transit of fossil fuels.

In turn, the representatives of Naftogaz demanded to speed up the consideration of the appeal of Gazprom, since, according to them, the Ukrainian side has already begun to carry out the arbitration decision.

The statement also alleges that Russians are actively refusing to execute the verdict, and one of the forms of evasion is their appeal.

The lawyers of Naftogaz added that if the implementation of the verdict will be suspended for 2, the demands of the Ukrainian side will exceed $ 3 billion. In addition, they expressed concern that during this time Gazprom would restructure its activities and avoid payments.

Recall that in February, the Stockholm arbitration satisfied the claims of the Ukrainian company to Gazprom in a gas transit claim in the amount of $ 4,673 billion. The court, taking into account the amount previously awarded in favor of Gazprom, offset the counterclaims and ordered the Russian company to pay Naftogaz a total of $ 2,56 billion

Representatives of Gazprom appealed the verdict and announced termination of contracts with Naftogaz.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    19 June 2018 09: 00
    Expedite, having considered the claim during the next 10 years, and then refuse, fellow
    1. +4
      19 June 2018 09: 05
      Kiev demanded from the court to speed up the consideration of the dispute with Gazprom

      And the casket just opened: Ukraine has nothing to pay its debts, and they want to expedite the receipt of money from Gazprom. Hence all these their "fears."
      1. +7
        19 June 2018 09: 12
        Pasha, hi! I agree, but they will not receive any money from Gazprom in life! Mirages! Gazprom is better off spending it (money) on lawyers than it agrees to give to Ukraine
        1. +2
          19 June 2018 09: 14
          Hi Eugene! hi The skakuasas themselves, most likely, understand this. But for lenders, is it necessary to create the appearance of seeking money to pay off debt?
        2. +3
          19 June 2018 09: 26
          Eugene, and here’s how to say ... Here’s how the judges are deploying this case ..
          Quote: Dashout
          Pasha, hi! I agree, but they will not receive any money from Gazprom in life! Mirages! Gazprom is better off spending it (money) on lawyers than it agrees to give to Ukraine
          1. MPN
            +6
            19 June 2018 09: 49
            Quote: 210ox
            Here, as a judge this case is deployed ..

            Well yes. And right away the classic is remembered ... "..and who are the judges?"
        3. +1
          19 June 2018 10: 25
          Quote: Dashout
          I agree, but they will not receive any money from Gazprom in life!

          Why? Gazprom never and never refused to pay on this claim, if the decision is confirmed. The dispute resolution procedure is specified in the contract. Another question is that Gazprom, in fact, accuses the court of forgery ...
          1. jjj
            +1
            19 June 2018 10: 38
            Quote: user1212
            Gazprom, in fact, accuses the court of forgery ...

            But the words for this are selected gracefully and thoughtfully
      2. +5
        19 June 2018 09: 31
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Ukraine has nothing to pay its debts, so they want to accelerate the receipt of money from Gazprom

        There the situation is much more serious:
        suspicion of substitution of a judge during the proceedings, which in itself is considered a serious violation of the law. The fact of forgery, according to Gazprom representatives, was confirmed by a linguistic analysis of the arbitrators' conclusion.
        "An additional study of the text of the arbitration award with the involvement of a world-renowned expert linguist showed that a significant part of the document was written not by the arbitrators, but by a different person," representatives of the Russian company said.

        Those. we are talking about blatant fraud and corruption of the Stockholm arbitration. And this is undermining the foundations of the entire Western economic system. And no one will be interested in whose error or on whose instructions the trust in the system collapsed. No one will definitely risk it because of the desire of some oligarchs to enrich themselves at the expense of others.
        1. +2
          19 June 2018 09: 36
          Those. trace marks take place? So one does not interfere with the other.
        2. +1
          19 June 2018 11: 55
          Quote: scientist
          Those. we are talking about blatant fraud and corruption of the Stockholm arbitration. And this is undermining the foundations of the entire Western economic system.

          That is why the district judge is likely to make a partial decision, which will not lead to the cancellation of the arbitral award, although the process itself promises to be funny - after all, hundreds of lawyers knew that judges use a mercenary to formulate verdicts, and arbitration judges will have to give affidavit .
          Well, the Sumerians with their statement generally sit on the priest exactly - this Gazprom appeal does not concern them at all. Because they were not even invited to the meeting.
      3. +4
        19 June 2018 09: 49
        No money? But you hold on!
      4. 0
        19 June 2018 10: 59
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Kiev demanded from the court to speed up the consideration of the dispute with Gazprom

        And the casket just opened: Ukraine has nothing to pay its debts, and they want to expedite the receipt of money from Gazprom. Hence all these their "fears."

        It follows from your comment that Gazprom will have to pay in any case. The only question is the timing.
        1. 0
          19 June 2018 11: 03
          Do not confuse “want” and “receive” - these are different concepts.
      5. +1
        19 June 2018 16: 07
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Kiev demanded from the court to speed up the consideration of the dispute with Gazprom

        And the casket just opened: Ukraine has nothing to pay its debts, and they want to expedite the receipt of money from Gazprom. Hence all these their "fears."


        If the horses had money, would the horses pay in debt?
    2. 0
      19 June 2018 10: 29
      It will be something like this, and there the donkey will die.
  2. +6
    19 June 2018 09: 01
    since the Ukrainian side, they said, had already begun to enforce the arbitral award.
    And beginning with the fact that top managers of Naftogaz have already received multimillion-dollar bonuses for Gazprom’s bending and have already sung them drink. But there is no money from Gazprom wassat
    I said so much fun that I didn’t even notice how it transformed into zrada. but as always
  3. +2
    19 June 2018 09: 01
    It’s time for Klimkin to check the Swedish court for corruption, and for the red tape of all their judges to bring to justice the full extent of the Kuev laws! belay
    1. 0
      19 June 2018 17: 36
      Klimkin and Co., with such difficulty and expense, organized a decision in their favor and all efforts to the wind. Zrada ... bully
  4. +4
    19 June 2018 09: 01
    It seems to me that soon even a Swedish court will send three-letter Naftohaz begging, they really podzadolby all Europe with their lamentations
  5. +5
    19 June 2018 09: 05
    If they ask me to speed it up, it means that I really need money .. Probably, to hold out until the elections without default .. Or to merge more into offshore on "life in exile" ...
  6. +1
    19 June 2018 09: 05
    It is being stressed that Gazprom transit should be reduced decently after 2019.
  7. +3
    19 June 2018 09: 26
    They have already divided the bonuses for this business, and here such a bummer! Look how busy they are. What if the verdict is canceled? Will you have to return the money? wassat
  8. +2
    19 June 2018 10: 39
    How you want money !!! Already after all, prizes were issued to themselves for collecting fines from Gazprom ... but there is still no money ... and most likely will not be ... It's a shame to panimash ...
  9. +2
    19 June 2018 10: 42
    And when will the Sumerians bring back a $ 3 billion loan from Putin? Or is it not their concern? Was the panda Yanukovych zyil?
  10. 0
    19 June 2018 10: 59
    Naftogaz’s lawyers added that if the verdict is suspended for 2 years, the Ukrainian side’s claims will exceed $ 3 billion. In addition, they expressed concern that Gazprom would restructure its activities and avoid payments.
    An interesting feint, it seems they are preparing it ...
  11. 0
    19 June 2018 11: 10
    I can’t wait to cut the dough for free.
  12. +2
    19 June 2018 11: 22
    All the freebies are looking for, but it’s high time to understand that you need to earn money.
    The main sales market in Russia and joint ventures were there, but they are pushing them away from this, and no one needs them on the European market.
  13. +1
    19 June 2018 12: 45
    I read it ... I am surprised at the optimism of the author of the article ... But even more surprising is the optimism of people leaving comments in the style of "Everything is fine ... this is our plan ... it’s still a bit and we’ll blame Ukraine ..." laughing
    In fact, everything is not entirely good ... And if we say it to the end, everything is bad ... Europe will knock out money from us ... And the Russian Federation in the person of Gazprom will pay everything to the last penny ... Moreover, the respected Gazprom without paying mine for future Nord Stream 2 projects in particular ...
    And after that a reasonable question arises, why is Gazprom's top management still not on the labor exchange? Why do we still have no one insists on the resignation of the government? So is Gazprom a state-owned company, a state-forming company and Gazprom's debts directly affect the budget of the Russian Federation? Where are the decisive and urgent actions of the government, including through the channels of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (which, as we know, everyone defeats everyone and can’t win in any way) aimed at normalizing this process?
    Okay, with sports and the Olympics, we got out of the air by pretending that our government, including the president, was not interested in sports in any way, and that was all the personal affairs of the athletes ... so they would not be helped.
    Something a bit too many questions accumulate for the current government ... and it seems that the government is ready to "merge" all its people for the sake of unknown interests ... am
    1. 0
      19 June 2018 14: 02
      Quote: Alex2048
      the current government ... and one gets the feeling that the government is ready to "merge" all its people for the sake of unknown interests

      The Russian people, in fact, unanimously over 76% voted in favor of this policy. Therefore, the government uses its carte blanche for any steps and decisions. Actually, there was no one else to vote for. The only normal candidate was Grudinin, but so much dirt in the media was poured on him that any normal person should simply vote for him out of a sense of justice.
      1. 0
        20 June 2018 11: 37
        Sorry, but it seems to me that this site is not a place for agitation or mockery of any of the former presidential candidates. He won according to the official and never disputed version of V.V. Putin ... the rest accordingly lost. The winners and the defeated are good or bad, it seems to me not the topic for this site ... I did not at all suggest changing the government and the president or dispersing the State Duma or the Legislative Assembly. I was more interested in what the government is guided by without actively interfering in the process of managing state property. I was wondering where the measures (and what are they?) Taken with respect to managers and lawyers who did not do their job well to work out the “nuances” of the agreement on gas transit and delivery to Ukraine? Why did the people from our Olympic Sports Committee remain in their posts, they generally sit there not only to cut the budget, but also seem to represent the interests of the Russian Federation in international structures, and nobody wants to listen to our officials in these structures based on the results of work? Well, etc.
        Without urging to overthrow and disperse everyone, I would like to understand what to prepare for next? After all, without discussing the winner of the presidential election, we still have the opportunity to discuss his decisions and the decisions of the government that he formed, we are not in the army, where, as you know, orders are first executed. smile
  14. BAI
    0
    19 June 2018 15: 42
    The statement also alleges that Russians are actively refusing to execute the verdict, and one of the forms of evasion is their appeal.

    In their opinion, we should immediately rush to pay them. Let them pay their debts first.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"