Military Review
Sign In Register

American experts have evaluated the new development of the Russian Federation - "Terminator-3"

29
Support combat vehicle developed by Russian engineers tanks Terminator 3 will be able to fight the “deadliest weapons USA "- unmanned aerial vehicles, writes The National Interest with reference to American experts.




According to the magazine, the BMPT-72 of the third generation will be able to fight against air and ground targets, while destroying "the living and inanimate force of the enemy." The new version will be equipped with surface-to-air munitions with "variable trajectory and detonation during flight." This will allow shooting down reconnaissance and combat Drones, emphasizes the author.

At the same time, according to him, this innovation raises a number of questions. For example, such: where to place ground-to-air ammunition if 9 different weapons systems are already installed on the vehicle; where to place the radar station? After all, if there is no radar, then the fight against drones will be effective only within the line of sight, the newspaper notes.

According to experts, “Terminator-3” is a “well-armored vehicle” that can effectively fight in urban environments, destroying enemy personnel and lightly armored targets. At the same time, the new BMPT-72 will become more resilient on the battlefield, however, it will require high maintenance costs.

Earlier, Rostec reported that the designers of Uralvagonzavod are shaping the look of a new generation of Terminator combat vehicles who can work on all types of targets.
Photos used:
ru.wikipedia.org / Vitaliy Kuzmin
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
29 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. cost
    cost 15 June 2018 09: 23
    +9
    American experts have evaluated the new development of the Russian Federation - "Terminator-3"

    What about the pictures? Or wikipedia?
    1. Anarchist
      Anarchist 15 June 2018 09: 26
      +11
      Quote: Rich
      American experts have evaluated the new development of the Russian Federation - "Terminator-3"

      What about the pictures? Or wikipedia?

      According to the comments of participants in various forums! Yes Plagiarized, in a word ...
      1. MPN
        MPN 15 June 2018 09: 53
        +11
        Quote: Anarchist
        According to the comments of participants in various forums! Plagiarized, in a word ...

        Oh, these "American experts" with fellow "English scientists" ... lol
      2. VO3A
        VO3A 15 June 2018 11: 35
        0
        The Terminator-3 tank support vehicle being developed by Russian engineers will be able to combat the “deadliest weapons of the United States” - unmanned aerial vehicles, writes The National Interest, citing American experts.

        Firstly, tanks in modern warfare are used only in the 3rd echelon of the offensive, for the final cleansing of the enemy’s centers of resistance ... But in a full-scale military clash without nuclear weapons they won’t be possible ... Only when fighting against militants can such a scenario be considered .... What tanks and when will this miracle machine support? Yes, it is effective in the city against militants, but for this they need a few pieces and they don’t do weather in the war ... Yes, and where and why should the enemy UAV in this case?
        Secondly, if the backward country, in terms of warfare, will use tanks in the 1st echelon, then they will be destroyed along with these "Terminators-3" even before the detection of the enemy, organized by the enemy ... Given the range of detection of enemy reconnaissance assets and the possibility of simple anti-tank weapons (up to 24 km), tanks will be guaranteed destroyed, as in a dash ....
        Thirdly, in the battle formations of the tank brigades of our army there are no modern reconnaissance systems that can eliminate the danger of an enemy attack, there are not even UAVs integrated into tank guidance systems and air defense vehicles and Terminators 3 ..., not to mention helicopters and airplanes ... This is by the way, about the complete absence of network-centric systems in our army ....
        From these positions, a good car Terminator 3 , nothing will change in our army, and it is needed in miserable small-syrian quantities .... But we simply do not have Combat Information Systems, which are the main systems in modern warfare ..., not to mention, their integration into systems guidance of all military equipment from aircraft to mortars. You can only dream about it ....
        1. GRF
          GRF 15 June 2018 12: 10
          +1
          Wow, without combat information systems, they’ll bury us in verbal demarcation ... And a good Terminator 3 machine will not change anything ...
          What planet VO3A are you from? When back?
          1. VO3A
            VO3A 15 June 2018 12: 17
            +2
            Until the age of 41, battle in the defense was not provided for in our army for tank units ... Do you know what this led to? Your hatred and backwardness will lead to the same ....
    2. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 15 June 2018 09: 27
      +2
      Hello Dima ! hi Well, this is NI magazine - there are only wangs and nostradamuses. lol
      1. cost
        cost 15 June 2018 09: 34
        +2
        Hi Paul hi
      2. Vova Kabaev
        Vova Kabaev 15 June 2018 10: 14
        +1
        You forgot to mention Tolerast!
      3. Alex777
        Alex777 15 June 2018 13: 17
        +2
        .... if there is no radar, then the fight against drones will be effective only within the line of sight, the publication notes.

        What did they not hear about optoelectronics? Why radar? To burn faster? hi
  2. Skay
    Skay 15 June 2018 09: 36
    0
    writes The National Interest

    And I immediately recall the "Messenger of Mordovia" winked
  3. Egorovich
    Egorovich 15 June 2018 09: 38
    0
    The armor is strong and our tanks are fast, let evil enemies know it !!! am
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 15 June 2018 09: 50
    +5
    To combat UAVs, Terminator-3 will have a wheeled trailer with Tor-M 4,75 laughing
  5. Huumi
    Huumi 15 June 2018 09: 53
    +1
    Cheburator ....
  6. DRA-75
    DRA-75 15 June 2018 09: 58
    +1
    If Americans praise, then something is not right ...
  7. Pacifist
    Pacifist 15 June 2018 10: 10
    +3
    What really asks for the terminator is Baikal or BM from Derivation-Air Defense. With remote-controlled ammunition, it will be just a hurricane.
    1. aristok
      aristok 15 June 2018 10: 33
      +1
      Quote: Pacifist
      What really asks for the terminator is Baikal or BM from Derivation-Air Defense. With remote-controlled ammunition, it will be just a hurricane.

      So it will be there - on terminator-3 ..
      In general, the 57mm gun had to be set up initially, without preying on the underdeveloped disproportionate freaks of the 1st and 2nd versions.
  8. aristok
    aristok 15 June 2018 10: 30
    +1
    The new version will be equipped with ground-to-air ammunition with a “variable trajectory and the possibility of detonation during flight." This will bring down reconnaissance and combat drones, the author emphasizes.
    At the same time, according to him, this innovation raises a number of questions. For example, such: where to place the ground-to-air ammunition if 9 different weapon systems are already installed on the machine

    It’s just ammunition for the 57mm assault rifle (some version of AU220M) that is planned for the 3 terminator
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 15 June 2018 10: 44
      +1
      Quote: aristok
      It’s just ammunition for the 57mm assault rifle (some version of AU220M) that is planned for the 3 terminator


      Actually ... the news recently jumped on the Internet: as if they were thinking of developing for the “terminators” the 50-mm "hybrid" of the gun and the launcher ... The elongated corrected 50-mm ARSs would be "kicked out" of the barrel with a reduced throwing charge, and then the rocket accelerator turns on ...
      1. aristok
        aristok 15 June 2018 11: 16
        +2
        so it seems to be about 57mm and it was .. Even in my opinion here on the ax and flashed
        1. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 15 June 2018 12: 56
          +1
          Quote: aristok
          so it seems to be about 57mm and it was .. Even in my opinion here on the ax and flashed

          It was about 57-mm .... I referred to the more recent "news" ... (though, if it is not a "scratch" ...)
          1. aristok
            aristok 15 June 2018 16: 14
            0
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            It was about 57-mm .... I referred to the more recent "news" ... (though, if it is not a "scratch" ...)

            over 99% what a typo ..
            And about 57mm it was just recently - much fresher ..
            1. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 15 June 2018 16: 50
              +1
              There is only one “hitch” .... the 57-mm gun (such as the “Derivations” ...) is a pretty high-pulse gun ... and the basis of the ammunition is “active” artillery shells ...
              The "promised" 50-mm "shooter" is a low-pulse weapon and is based on the ARS ammunition with an "emphasis" on the missile "component" .... what
              1. Nikolaevich I
                Nikolaevich I 15 June 2018 17: 07
                +2
                PS “A fifty-millimeter gun provides much more opportunities for working on targets than Soviet-style 30-millimeter guns installed on the Terminator, now purchased by the Russian Ministry of Defense,” a source told RIA Novosti.
                It also became known that new shells are being developed for the new gun. For example, one of them will be able to detonate by a signal at a certain distance, and the second will be able to correct the flight path to the target, which will be very useful for combating enemy unmanned aerial vehicles. In other words, the new version of BMPT will be able to fight almost any kind of targets - land, sea and air.
                At the same time, the military analyst is confident that the corrected shells will certainly become useful for the new version of Terminator. Koshkin notes that modern tactics and strategies involve the use of guided missile weapons, so new shells will be closer to missiles.
                “I’m sure that a more thoughtful approach to the 50-mm gun is being used now and, probably, it will somewhat resemble the 2A70 launcher, which is capable of launching missiles directly through the barrel. And so I think that some kind of small-diameter rocket will be used here, which launches towards the target and tucks it with a laser if necessary. In addition, the missile can even have a GOS (homing head), ”concluded Koshkin.
                1. Nikolaevich I
                  Nikolaevich I 15 June 2018 17: 12
                  +1
                  I read a little about the tools "for" the terminator ,, (57-mm and 50-mm ...) .... Still ... 50-mm-most likely a typo ...
  9. Servisinzhener
    Servisinzhener 15 June 2018 10: 30
    0
    So he can now work on air targets, but only the effectiveness is significantly lower than that of the air defense system. Maybe in the new version they will replace the 30 mm guns with 57 mm with ammunition of remote detonation which will somewhat expand the possibilities in this regard. But they are unlikely to do any specialization in the fight against drones. To do this, there are other combat vehicles that allow you to perform the air defense task more efficiently.
  10. Grits
    Grits 15 June 2018 12: 36
    +2
    When they begin to write about a Terminator in an article, they always post completely different pictures. Here, in the picture, the terminator is "stripped down" - there are no grenade launchers on it. To reduce the number of crew members. As a result, the car lost some of its striking power, but for some reason it is considered more advanced than the previous one. Honestly, I myself began to get confused - there is a BMPT and there is a BMPT-72. And it is not clear which of them has grenade launchers. Because a request on the Internet will give you views of both of them, without too much understanding. And then there is Terminator 3. What will he look like?
    1. aristok
      aristok 15 June 2018 16: 34
      0
      Quote: Gritsa
      When they begin to write about a Terminator in an article, they always post completely different pictures. Here, in the picture, the terminator is "stripped down" - there are no grenade launchers on it. To reduce the number of crew members. As a result, the car lost some of its striking power, but for some reason it is considered more advanced than the previous one. Honestly, I myself began to get confused - there is a BMPT and there is a BMPT-72. And it is not clear which of them has grenade launchers. Because a request on the Internet will give you views of both of them, without too much understanding. And then there is Terminator 3. What will he look like?

      I agree - spread the confusion around BMPT.
      A terminator 3 will be made around a 57mm gun. - this will be the most important difference and a decision fundamentally changing combat power. (which had to be applied in the very first version of the BMP - but better late than never)
  11. aristok
    aristok 19 June 2018 12: 36
    0
    Bofors 57mm gun MkIII - Test Firings
    Shooting with various ammunition (including remote detonation) against different types of targets