Russia - USA: Destroy your stockpiles of chemical weapons!

29
The Russian embassy in Washington turned to the United States about the well-known staging of chemical attacks in Syria and a number of oddities in the so-called Scripals case. Russian diplomats are calling on Washington to declassify information about the chemical agent in the United States, announced by official London, commenting on the “poisoning” of Skripl and his daughter. We are talking about the substance "Novice", after the alleged use of which Creaked in Salisbury survived. It seems that this is the only case of survival after the "poisoning of CWA".

The Russian embassy, ​​using Twitter as a platform for public circulation, called on the US authorities to destroy the chemical weapon. Recall that agreements between Russia and the United States are in force regarding the destruction of chemical arsenals. The Russian side on the complete destruction of all stockpiles of chemical weapons reported. And the American side, as always, showed "compelling reasons" to postpone the destruction. Washington cited the “lack of funds” as the main “cause”. This is in the presence of the military budget, which is at least 15 times larger than the Russian one.



Russia - USA: Destroy your stockpiles of chemical weapons!


In Russia, the United States reminds that provocations with chemical weapons in different parts of the world can have deeply negative consequences. At the same time, the Russian embassy showed several clips in which the militants themselves tell about their performances, sharing information about their previously prepared script.
  • Facebook
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    15 June 2018 05: 51
    using Twitter as a platform for public circulation

    Is it weak on the fence?

    Or on the battery. You know, cast-iron ones. Huge. Whatever the phone.
    1. +8
      15 June 2018 06: 20
      Good idea ... If a person bangs his head on the battery ... Then everything reaches him much faster ...
      1. +3
        15 June 2018 06: 22
        Quote: Vard
        If a person bangs his head on the battery.


        And if the battery on the head?

        Cast iron section. laughing
        1. +1
          15 June 2018 06: 25
          It is possible and so ... How is it ... What is annual about a stump ... With what we kick about ...
          1. +2
            15 June 2018 06: 25
            No question.

            So what? There are no fences in front of the White House. Let them go and see.

            But we know that there is firewood.
            1. MPN
              +6
              15 June 2018 10: 37
              Like everything that Russia says, well, it’s not convincing somehow .... Now, if it were like this: “If you don’t destroy it before the 25th, we will destroy them in your place, you only have to carry out degassing and deactivation ...”
    2. +3
      15 June 2018 07: 25
      Quote: Vanek
      Is it weak on the fence?

      And who owns all the media? Will they together pick up our demands? That is via Twitter. Well and through.
      1. +3
        15 June 2018 07: 36
        The Russian Embassy, ​​using Twitter as a platform for public circulation, called on US authorities to destroy chemical weapons

        Twitter? And is that all our embassy is capable of? Something even somehow uncomfortable
    3. Maz
      +2
      15 June 2018 08: 58
      It would be nice for Israel to report on the availability and destruction of nuclear weapons ... Friendships are strategic, but where it comes from.
    4. Maz
      +5
      15 June 2018 09: 16

      Shoshosh, what kind of chemical weapons? Crimea is Russian?
  2. +5
    15 June 2018 05: 51
    Russia - USA: Destroy your stockpiles of chemical weapons!
    So they destroy ... in Syria.
  3. +7
    15 June 2018 05: 52
    The thieves themselves are the loudest shout "hold the thief". But indeed, the stocks of chemical weapons in the United States are probably the only ones in the world. On such a scale. Hegemons, however! Everything is possible.
  4. +5
    15 June 2018 05: 57
    You can call on the United States to destroy chemical weapons even at the UN, at least at the OPCW, and at least hold demonstrations around the world. But at least ... spit in their eyes ... Until the United States abandons the idea of ​​a global non-nuclear strike on Russia, they will not liquidate their stockpiles of chemical weapons.
    1. +3
      15 June 2018 06: 25
      Quote: Alex-a832
      You can call on the United States to destroy chemical weapons at least at the UN

      Why call them? stop They can’t do it themselves, let them drag it to one place in the desert, and Russia will help - a small chemical "Hiroshima" wassat
      1. +2
        15 June 2018 10: 28
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Why call them? They can’t do it themselves, let them drag it to one place in the desert, and Russia will help - a small chemical "Hiroshima"

        Why drag it into the desert? Russia needs to destroy the American chemical weapons at the place of registration))) the United States has existed for 250 years, and after the babakh, no one will live there for 300 years. Humanity will at least breathe a sigh of relief.
  5. +5
    15 June 2018 06: 16
    Russia - USA: Destroy your stockpiles of chemical weapons!
    Yes, yes. Now you can even yell at least every day. There will only be zero. You can, of course, agree with the United States on the reduction of nuclear weapons wassat
    1. 0
      16 June 2018 20: 11
      But with the reduction, Sergey, you got excited. We don’t need this, let our warheads lie quietly, so calm the whole world.
  6. +2
    15 June 2018 06: 38
    They have this chemistry ..., for 1000 years, enough to arrange provocations around the world.
  7. +1
    15 June 2018 07: 40
    It’s naive to demand from the sharpie to “declassify” his speck on the cards. Well, at least draw attention to the same sharpies!
  8. +3
    15 June 2018 07: 47
    At the same time, the Russian embassy showed several videos in which the militants themselves talk about their productions, sharing information about their pre-prepared script.

    The United States even pisses in the eye, all God's dew .. laughing But we need to talk about this methodically, while Russia has little leverage over the west! soldier
  9. +1
    15 June 2018 07: 56
    Quote: Vard
    It is possible and so ... How is it ... What is annual about a stump ... With what we kick about ...

    ... they forgot the owl ..
  10. +2
    15 June 2018 09: 20
    I got a crazy idea .. =) If the mattresses are so expensive to dispose of chemicals. Weapons, let's offer our services as a contract for recycling ?! And we will earn and eliminate weapons. To raise this issue with the UN, as part of an international convention .. smile It will cost them less.
  11. +1
    15 June 2018 09: 58
    Quote: Zubr
    I got a crazy idea .. =) If the mattresses are so expensive to dispose of chemicals. Weapons, let's offer our services as a contract for recycling ?! And we will earn and eliminate weapons. To raise this issue with the UN, as part of an international convention .. smile It will cost them less.

    The idea is good. but here is the detail. When the deadlines for the destruction of chemical weapons were last agreed upon, then the deadline was first determined 2021, then EMNIP 2023. According to the Wyoming Protocol, both Russia and the United States had the right to leave up to 5% of their chemical weapons not destroyed by the EMNIP, while other countries with chemical weapons would not do so. The Americans completely legally "pull the clock", but here we are ....
    Here, we decided to be ahead of the rest, took up the Stakhanov shift to destroy our own chemical weapons and did this for 5 years ahead of schedule. Now we are trying to force the Americans to do the same, to destroy their chemical weapons ahead of schedule. But after all, what kind of scoundrels they are, they do not want to be suckers and are not being fooled by this, they are not going to fulfill the “five-year plan in four years” ...
    1. -2
      16 June 2018 04: 13
      Chemical weapons are not needed - only money for maintenance requires correctly destroyed.
  12. 0
    15 June 2018 17: 51
    There were no survivors after poisoning BOV? And in Tokyo, no one survived in the subway? It seems there were reports that many survived.
    But Hitler survived twice already. And then I had enough strength to poralesit. True, it was a completely different generation of BOV.
    1. 0
      16 June 2018 09: 49
      Quote: alien308
      There were no survivors after poisoning BOV? And in Tokyo, no one survived in the subway? It seems there were reports that many survived.
      ...

      Here the main question - was there a BOV? Zarin on the "knee" can not do. At that time, even on our cartridges with an irritating substance for self-defense they wrote - "a substance of nerve-paralytic effect." Skripale, too, was “Trapped” by the “Novice”, allegedly, and even formally by all the general signs of defeat it was “BZ”: "... pupil dilatation, general weakness, mental oppression, impaired contact with others, loss of orientation in time and space ... "The duration of the toxic effect is from a few hours to 2-3 days (depending on the dose)."
    2. 0
      17 June 2018 20: 18
      Nerve agent is not so difficult to do. For example, I don’t know how and I don’t want to know, but already in the seventies there were craftsmen. Everything rests on the special services. The most hostile and hating each other intelligence agencies suddenly show unprecedented harmony and effectiveness and show the target audience the results of what will happen to those who dig in what.
  13. 0
    15 June 2018 20: 37
    Putin destroyed the chemical weapons, and not in the FSB, nor in any other state. There were no screams and protests to the structure, not a single general, no one said: what are you doing!?, The Americans are increasing the military budget, expanding the bases near our borders, putting up missile defense, it’s impossible to destroy chemistry!

    Now you know what the level of security in the country is, zero!
    Any deputy and president can say that there is no need for nuclear weapons, in the military industry, and condemn everything to the joy of NATO.

    Do you think Erdagon just started to say so, they say let's open a joint production of s500?
    It can be seen that the Antei diamond will go beyond the horizon in about ten years, somewhere in China, Turkey.
    Raska is a rashka.
    1. 0
      17 June 2018 20: 08
      Storage of chemical weapons is a big hemorrhoid, and the storage event in readiness for combat use is not much different from its production. Well it in FIG. Are there enough delivery vehicles? And what's the point then to keep barrels, bombs and shells?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"