Military Review

Without counterbalance Ukrainian "Gyurza" is not dangerous

51
Artillery armored “Gyurza-M”, recently adopted by the Ukrainian Navy, turned out to be practically useless for its intended purpose: guns of boats can not fire efficiently without using a “heavy brick” - a counterweight to improve stability and stabilize the combat module.




As noted blogger Diana Mikhailova, this flaw was noticed by experts while watching a video published by the Ukrainian military. The video shows the boat "Lubny", arrived at the end of last year in Odessa for the final tests. At the end of the video, the “element of the declared stabilization system” falls into the frame, that is, a counterbalance of at least 100 kg, fixed inside the combat module.

On the Web, the Ukrainian “original technology” has been heavily criticized. From the military demanded to demonstrate the results of shooting on the wave, at least in 2 points.

In the meantime, from the "weighty brick" the impression of an early maturing palliative, acceptable somewhere on the river or as a maximum in the "tyxen bay", writes the user EDU.

Another user (Igor_More) noted that placing the “brick” in the module for the counterweight can cause the “pathogen to remain calm from the carrier”.



Involuntarily recalls a prototype of the Ukrainian An-178 aircraft, in which ballast weights in 1,3 tons were used to ensure normal alignment.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
51 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. TermNachTer
    TermNachTer 14 June 2018 16: 04
    +26
    The whole value of these boats lies in the fact that they are being built by the Lenin Forge factory, which belongs to Parashenko.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Pirogov
      Pirogov 14 June 2018 19: 25
      +3
      Quote: TermNachTER
      The whole value of these boats lies in the fact that they are being built by the Lenin Forge factory, which belongs to Parashenko.

      I agree. And it’s very impudent, I still won’t get drunk. ..........
  2. Vard
    Vard 14 June 2018 16: 05
    +4
    Typhoon was tested ... Hydrofoil ship ... When the stabilization system was turned on, the water in the glass was trembling .... Three ball storm
    1. jjj
      jjj 14 June 2018 18: 08
      +7
      They will feel the error of the project very quickly. Here the Ukrainians wanted to play type in stealth. The boat has virtually no deck. For a little tank and utah. The forecastle and poop are very modest. And no waist.
      For a missile boat, automated and mechanized, this does not matter. Unless there is any inconvenience when mooring. But this boat is designed for tasks when deck spaces are needed: at least for the landing, at least for the inspection team, at least for a small cargo delivered with the opportunity. And there is very little space. And the complete lack of rails
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 14 June 2018 16: 09
    +5
    Well, I couldn’t ... I wanted to ... laughing
    This boat - well, not a sea one. And the counterweight ... they quickly designed it.
    1. Bad_santa
      Bad_santa 14 June 2018 16: 18
      +3
      A boat to induce fear on poachers, and then the latter have the opportunity to leave the dangerous area in advance. when meeting with a warship on this boat, you urgently need to hang fishing nets, quickly add a new superstructure from plywood, and when the enemy approaches, wave your hand and smile sweetly
    2. Baloo
      Baloo 14 June 2018 16: 23
      +2
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Well, I couldn’t ... I wanted to ... laughing
      This boat - well, not a sea one. And the counterweight ... they quickly designed it.

      Poor physics is taught in Ukrainian schools or they don’t want to study, everyone jumps up ...
      1. TermNachTer
        TermNachTer 14 June 2018 16: 28
        +7
        What does physics have to do with it, the Moscow Region paid the full amount for the boats when they were still on the slip. Whether they swim or not, it didn’t matter at all. About shooting, it was not said at all
        1. Baloo
          Baloo 14 June 2018 17: 09
          +3
          Quote: TermNachTER
          What does physics have to do with it, the Moscow Region paid the full amount for the boats when they were still on the slip. Whether they swim or not, it didn’t matter at all. About shooting, it was not said at all

          Was the boat itself or was it designed by shipbuilders? By the way, and for 4 years of being disgusting or disgusting (I don’t remember, call barefoot), Ukraine has something to be proud of in shipbuilding, aircraft building, bridge building, mechanical engineering, well, at least in something. I’m here a “Russian woman from Gorlovka” - “Victoria” or whatever she asked her / him, so offended, refused to communicate. belay
          1. TermNachTer
            TermNachTer 14 June 2018 18: 16
            +2
            It was designed by people from the Roshen corporation to cut the budget, no one thought about the fleet at all.
          2. APASUS
            APASUS 14 June 2018 20: 22
            +3
            Quote: Balu
            Was the boat itself or was it designed by shipbuilders? By the way, and for 4 years of being disgusting or disgusting (I don’t remember, call barefoot), Ukraine has something to be proud of in shipbuilding, aircraft building, bridge building, mechanical engineering, well, at least in something.

            Actually, this boat was designed purely under the river, then the river-sea designation was inexplicably added, although this is a purely river project
            1. TermNachTer
              TermNachTer 15 June 2018 20: 32
              0
              He is even for the river, under a very strong question. Because the high superstructure and combat modules are high. Stability allows you to go out with an excitement of 3 - 4 points and that is scary. And such excitement also happens on the reservoirs of the Dnieper cascade.
    3. alexmach
      alexmach 14 June 2018 16: 35
      +3
      Something I do not quite understand the essence of the controversy. According to the voiced esperts, a counterweight to a gun sticking out of the module a couple of meters ahead is not needed or what?
      1. TermNachTer
        TermNachTer 14 June 2018 20: 19
        +3
        There is no polemic as such. The bottom line is that the presence of a counterweight and its absence fundamentally does not change anything. Since the boat was created exclusively as a tool for cutting the budget
        1. alexmach
          alexmach 15 June 2018 10: 53
          0
          Reason why you think so? Do you think that Ukraine does not need such boats at all?
          1. Sanichsan
            Sanichsan 15 June 2018 16: 51
            0
            Quote: alexmach
            You believe such Ukraine does not need boats at all?

            such no one seems to need a boat ... although it’s probably suitable for a river flotilla. the point here is not a counterbalance but the absence of a stabilizer. well and illiterate ukroekspertov misleading readers laughing
            what we see on the video is really a counterweight without which apparently difficulties with guidance appear, but for some reason the Ukrainians give it out as an emulation of the stabilizer required for the navy. such a mess wink
            1. alexmach
              alexmach 15 June 2018 17: 27
              0
              such boats do not seem to be needed by anyone ... although they are probably suitable for a river flotilla.

              So do not need, or still fit?
              it's not a counterbalance, but the lack of a stabilizer

              And where did you get that about the lack of a stabilizer? Where does this come from?
              what we see on the video is really a counterweight without which apparently difficulties with guidance appear, but for some reason the Ukrainians give it out as an emulation of the stabilizer required for the navy. such a mess wink

              First of all, I didn’t see that on the video something pretended to be something. Secondly, you read local journalists, well, at least in VO, see what they pee.
              1. Sanichsan
                Sanichsan 15 June 2018 17: 35
                0
                Quote: alexmach
                And where did you get that about the lack of a stabilizer? Where does this come from?

                did you watch the video? at what point did the stabilizer work there? Or are you talking about a dude with a joystick that performs the role of a stabilizer? laughing
                Quote: alexmach
                First of all, I didn’t see that on the video something pretended to be something.

                Ltd! you seem to not only not watch the video but also not read the article laughing immediately to komentami ... cool!
                Quote: alexmach
                Secondly, you read local journalists, well, at least in VO, see what they pee.

                that is, you just didn’t read the article here? and what VO articles do you read before moving on to the comment? just to decide on a circle of interests laughing
                1. Petryk_Piatochkyn
                  Petryk_Piatochkyn 15 June 2018 23: 25
                  0
                  Did you watch the video? At what point did the stabilizer work there?

                  Stabilization works from the moment power is supplied to the drive.
                  1. Sanichsan
                    Sanichsan 18 June 2018 15: 36
                    0
                    Quote: Petryk_Piatochkyn
                    Stabilization works from the moment power is supplied to the drive.

                    naturally! Of course, if there is a drive ...
                    but the video shows that there is no stabilization ... the gun goes along with the ship.
                    so why wasn’t that there? power supply or drives?
                    1. alexmach
                      alexmach 18 June 2018 22: 39
                      -1
                      So there is no way to judge this by video. But of course, on every news from Ukraine it is necessary to pokahdahat and tell some Ukrainians.
                      1. Sanichsan
                        Sanichsan 19 June 2018 15: 24
                        +1
                        Quote: alexmach
                        So there is no way to judge this by video.

                        Stop. the fact that there is no video stabilization is a fact. the fact that ukroeksperdy rams and can not distinguish the balancer from the stabilizer is also a fact.
                        Quote: alexmach
                        But of course, on every news from Ukraine it is necessary to pokahdahat and tell some Ukrainians.

                        and why is it suddenly impossible to laugh at these clowns? they are trying for us wink
                        if you personally have a pain for ukroboronprom then I sympathize. to hurt her forever.
                        and most have fun watching this booth, and you cannot forbid laughing at clowns.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                    3. Petryk_Piatochkyn
                      Petryk_Piatochkyn 20 June 2018 23: 35
                      +1
                      It can be seen when the barrel is raised. (Before firing from a grenade launcher).
                      1. Sanichsan
                        Sanichsan 21 June 2018 16: 59
                        0
                        received soldier
                        however, questions about how it will be in 3-4 points remain. wink
                      2. Petryk_Piatochkyn
                        Petryk_Piatochkyn 21 June 2018 22: 27
                        0
                        Just in 3-4 points that target was sunk (1,5m x 1,5m x 2m, distance 2,1 - 1,7 km).
          2. TermNachTer
            TermNachTer 15 June 2018 20: 34
            0
            No seaworthiness, no weapons, no booking. What other arguments are needed?
  4. svp67
    svp67 14 June 2018 16: 23
    +6
    guns of boats cannot conduct effective fire without the use of "heavy brick" - a counterweight to improve stability and stabilize the combat module.
    It seems to me that the progenitor of these combat modules, the land BM Sturm, was designed for something lighter, such as 12,7 mm or 14,5 mm. But when switching to 30 mm, so as not to upset the balance, they had to use an additional counterweight
  5. Proton
    Proton 14 June 2018 16: 24
    +4
    It is a sin to laugh at the wretched laughing but something all of them comes out of manure and sticks.
  6. Mikelanjelo
    Mikelanjelo 14 June 2018 16: 41
    +4
    What kind of gamer is this at 0:40 in training and with the joystick))))))
    1. Petryk_Piatochkyn
      Petryk_Piatochkyn 15 June 2018 23: 38
      0
      Industry representative in training
  7. andrewkor
    andrewkor 14 June 2018 16: 44
    +3
    When testing the legendary Boeing-747, there was a vibration of the wings in flight. In the end, they came to a simple solution: when making a load of 500 kg for each engine pylon from plain cast iron.
    1. Aviator_
      Aviator_ 14 June 2018 21: 18
      +3
      If you are talking about anti-flatter balancers, then this is a standard engineering solution that shifts the center of mass forward relative to the center of stiffness. It has been used in aviation since the beginning of the 40 of the last century. And dill has something innovative.
  8. net0103net
    net0103net 14 June 2018 17: 00
    +2
    This is a good weapon, it must be recognized as fit, and the subsequent destruction in an "equal" battle with our boat of the same class should be attributed to the unpreparedness of the personnel of the Ukrainian Navy ... and it’s all about the hat. The American media do this, they constantly raise us to the pitchfork ... for the Russians, for the Russians it is ... and everything is very scary and dangerous. But then they hit us economically because it is now their strength. Therefore, in this case, you can implement a simpler scheme. Flattery - the food of fools - maydaunas should be convinced that they themselves are something without EUROSHA. Let them save trash under which we will bury them later.
    1. Normal ok
      Normal ok 14 June 2018 20: 52
      +2
      Quote: net0103net
      destruction in an “equal” battle with our boat of the same class

      Do you think that things are better on "our armored vehicles"?
      1. net0103net
        net0103net 14 June 2018 20: 56
        +1
        We have a choice of at least three options, but they do not. Everything depends on interest. It will be necessary - they will bring the newest. The FSB will not sail on BAD boats.
  9. AID.S
    AID.S 14 June 2018 17: 02
    +1
    Involuntarily recalls a prototype of the Ukrainian An-178 aircraft, in which ballast weights in 1,3 tons were used to ensure normal alignment.

    Laptop how, damn it.
  10. AID.S
    AID.S 14 June 2018 17: 03
    +1
    Involuntarily recalls a prototype of the Ukrainian An-178 aircraft, in which ballast weights in 1,3 tons were used to ensure normal alignment.

    Knowh, damn it.
    1. 123456789
      123456789 14 June 2018 18: 50
      +2
      Quote: AID.S
      Involuntarily recalls a prototype of the Ukrainian An-178 aircraft, in which ballast weights in 1,3 tons were used to ensure normal alignment.

      Knowh, damn it.

      Or how? laughing
      1. TermNachTer
        TermNachTer 14 June 2018 20: 23
        +3
        Test pilots spoke about this airplane exclusively abusively. Due to the very rear alignment, the take-off is rather difficult. And if the cargo in the cabin is not placed correctly, then everything is generally bad.
  11. Ros 56
    Ros 56 14 June 2018 17: 16
    +3
    Most struck by the home fan standing on the remote control in the wheelhouse to the left of the commander or helm, who he is there with them. They have on boats that stationary ventilation is not provided, do you need to take with you from home? fellow
    Py.Sy. on the 17th second of the video and then flashes again.
  12. Mih1974
    Mih1974 14 June 2018 18: 22
    +3
    laughing Elegantly, a very “stable” gloomy Khokhlyatsky genius issues “decisions” with the obligatory fucked cast-iron counterbalance.
    1. 123456789
      123456789 14 June 2018 19: 26
      +1
      A gun stabilizer on the "Bastion" is also arranged?
      1. Bad thing
        Bad thing 15 June 2018 07: 57
        +2
        I will say moreover, on most systems using an arms stabilizer, there are counterbalances, regardless of the country of production, very few systems where the center of mass coincides with the axis of the pins.
    2. LeonidL
      LeonidL 15 June 2018 06: 41
      +2
      But then look how the counterweight is painted qualitatively !!!! Evaluate the work of the wretched, otherwise it’s a gloomy genius and a gloomy genius ... The Teutonic genius was gloomy, which until the last minutes of World War II produced various kun pieces that were ahead of their time for decades ... and here ... No, but how well the counterweight is painted !!!!
  13. beeper
    beeper 14 June 2018 18: 57
    +5
    The ugly, by design, “confectionery” boats and seemingly completely non-navigable, the hulls are disproportionately narrow, and the sides are littered inside (according to the stealth system, “as big” smile ?) - for the convenience of transportation, or something, but not for the convenience of the crew?
    It becomes especially terrible for sailors when you see (on another, not this, video) such an ironing from the side going diagonally to the sea at a wavelength of 3 points (about 4-5 points and I don’t think they will be in the base?). The stabilizer of the bow installation at 3 points of unrest at sea did not have time, it was obvious to work out the longitudinal and keel pitching, it was late.
    And on this vidos, with a calmer sea, on a direct course, the boat tangibly rolls from side to side. And the shooting also does not go very well, the target mark (and the cannon mount itself) does not react sensitively to the joystick guidance, or does it seem to me ?! winked
    But the white home desktop fan, to the left of the helm, also struck me, because even in land bus-minibuses with built-in fans the order is complete, and this w-warship, for its intended purpose, and in the wake it shakes, the tabletop will fly off and even on the cheek or he will cut the elbow of the steering sailor, he will turn the helm from unexpectedness and the unstable slender cutter will make an overkill at speed winked ?!
  14. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 14 June 2018 20: 15
    +2
    One involuntarily recalls a prototype of the Ukrainian An-178 aircraft, in which a ballast of 1,3 tons was used to ensure normal alignment


    and also recalls the American M26 tank Pershing, in which, due to the long barrel, a cast-iron counterweight weighing one and a half tons was fixed at the stern of the tower.
  15. Normal ok
    Normal ok 14 June 2018 20: 51
    +2
    As noted by blogger Diana Mikhailova

    No, well, Diana Mikhailova - this is of course a recognized expert in the Navy wassat
  16. Zomanus
    Zomanus 14 June 2018 23: 53
    +1
    Yes, in general, do not care. The more Ukraine spends money on these crafts,
    the faster it falls apart. Yes, and we will be calmer.
  17. LeonidL
    LeonidL 15 June 2018 06: 37
    0
    Fleet unit! ... Well, well ... I think that to a unity to this mosquito as to the moon.
  18. Grits
    Grits 15 June 2018 11: 39
    0
    But what a terrible name ... creeping
  19. Royalist
    Royalist 15 June 2018 12: 15
    0
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Well, I couldn’t ... I wanted to ... laughing
    This boat - well, not a sea one. And the counterweight ... they quickly designed it.

    Such a boat has a wide field of activity in estuaries and large rivers: to drive poachers, and they are already well-trained, various organized crime groups or RDG
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. Petryk_Piatochkyn
    Petryk_Piatochkyn 21 June 2018 22: 03
    0
    SanichSan, Just in 3-4 points that target was sunk (1,5m x 1,5m x 2m, distance 2,1 - 1,7 km). [Quote] [/ quote]
  22. The comment was deleted.