Tu-22M3 will sink your aircraft carrier

43
Russia implements several projects to modernize long-range aircraft aviationaccording to which the bombers will be able to use the new weapon and show improved fighting qualities. These works naturally attract the attention of foreign experts, become a cause for concern, and also turn into topics for publication in the press. So, the American edition of The National Interest recently drew attention to the Russian project Tu-22М3М.

The June 5 edition has published a new article with a loud headline "Russia's Tu-22M3 Backfire, The Bomber That Could Sink a Navy Aircraft Carrier" - "Meet the Russian Tu-22М3 - a bomber that can sink an aircraft carrier." The article from the headings The Buzz and Security was prepared by the editors of the publication.



The article begins with a reminder of the current work of the Russian aviation industry in the field of long-range bombers. The terrifying Russian Tupolev Tu-22М3 (NATO backfire) is undergoing a new update. Among other things, the upgraded aircraft should receive a new X-32 supersonic long-range missile. The authors believe that after such an update, the bomber will again become a threat to various sites of the North Atlantic region, as it was in the past, during the Cold War. It is expected that the upgraded aircraft with new weapons will go to aerospace forces in October this year.



The publication refers to the recent reports of the "Russian state" news agency TASS. 15 May, citing an unnamed source in the defense industry, this media reported on the future start of operation of the updated Tu-22М3М aircraft and promising X-32 missiles. The October 2018 of the year was named as the start date for their collaboration.

The National Interest edition reminds that the newest X-32 rocket is a variant of the further development of the old X-22 product (AS-4 Kitchen according to NATO classification), developed in the Raduga ICD during the Cold War. It is noted that the appearance of the X-32 rocket gives the Tu-22М3М aircraft great potential in striking. In this case, now we are talking not only about the attack of surface ships. Such missiles can also be used to destroy ground targets in Europe.

Large and heavy rocket X-22 at one time was designed to attack aircraft carriers of the US Navy. Created on its base, a new weapon, apparently, is intended to destroy a wide range of targets of various kinds. It can be used to attack bridges, military bases, power plants, etc. The goal for the X-32 can be any large object located at a great distance from the launch area.

The publication notes an interesting feature of information about the rocket X-32. Russian sources refer this product to the class of long-range cruise missiles. However, it has some features characteristic of air-based ballistic missiles. So, the rocket is equipped with a fluid engine and during the flight it is capable of rising to a height of 1300 thousand feet (about 40 km), after which it goes into a dive and goes to the target. According to Russian sources, in flight X-32 develops a speed of order M = 5. The range is stated at 1000 km - about 600 miles. The missile is equipped with a combined control system that includes inertial navigation devices and an active radar homing head.

Simultaneously with the creation of new missiles, Russia is engaged in updating the fleet of Tu-22М3 bombers, which have long served. It is expected that the repair and upgrading procedure of the Tu-22М3М project will take place around 20 or 30 planes in the military. This upgrade involves the installation of improved turbojet engines with an afterburner chamber NK-25. Such engines, developing traction up to 50 thousand pounds, will have full life and can be operated for a long time. In addition, the updated “Backfires” will receive improved on-board electronic equipment similar to that used in the Tu-160М2 project. Finally, as a result of the modernization, the range of compatible weapons will be expanded.

The editors of The National Interest believe that such a development is possible when Tu-22М3 airplanes will be gradually decommissioned. Russia plans to resume construction of Tu-160М2 bombers and create a large fleet of such vehicles. Fifty new cars will have obvious advantages over the existing Tu-22М3 in solving various problems, including when attacking ground targets.

Also, the success of the front bombers Su-22 may affect the further fate of the Tu-3М34. This aircraft has high performance, is equipped with modern onboard equipment and carries advanced weapons, and thanks to this it can successfully attack most European targets that would have previously been the target for strikes of Tu-22М3.

As a result, the development of Russian attack aircraft has not the most pleasant results for the Tu-22M3. These machines on a non-alternative basis can occupy only a relatively narrow tactical niche. The authors of the article note that this fact can explain the main feature of the planned modernization: only half of the available will be updated fleet.

In its niche, in the matter of delivering missile strikes to ship groups from large distances, the Tu-22М3 has few competitors. During the Cold War, the Soviet Backfire X-22 bombers were a real curse for the US naval forces. The air armada as part of the set of Tu-22М3 could inflict the most serious blow to the ship group.

To combat such a threat, the American side had to work out new tactics and create new weapons. So, the strategy Outer Air Battle was proposed, which included the interception of aircraft and missiles at a great distance from the ships. It played an important role ships with Aegis systems and carrier-based fighter Grumman F-14 Tomcat, armed with long-range air-to-air missiles AIM-54 Phoenix. The American command hoped that ships and airplanes could work together to counter the attack of Soviet bombers.

The modern air fleet of Tu-22М3 aircraft belonging to the Russian Federation is a small part of the force that the Soviet Union had several decades ago. However, as a result of upgrading technology with the installation of new electronic systems and the use of modern weapons, even such a reduced group will be a serious threat, even if not as numerous as in the past. As a result, a potential adversary in the face of the United States has new problems.

The situation is further aggravated by the events of recent years that have taken place in the United States. The deck aircraft of the American naval forces have not long been used by the F-14 fighters and their AIM-54 missiles. The result of the rejection of such equipment and weapons was the "atrophy" of the fleet's anti-aircraft capabilities. As a result, even the quantitatively modest potential of the Russian Tu-22М3М bombers may pose a particular danger to the aircraft carrier group. The potential of the X-32 rocket, which shows high speed and maneuverability, is enhanced by the updated Russian aircraft.

The editors of The National Interest believe that the US naval forces still have the opportunity to protect their aircraft carriers from the impact of the Russian Tu-22М3М aircraft and X-32 missiles. The response to such a threat will be carrier-based fighters Boeing F / A-18E / F Super Hornet, as well as cruisers and destroyers equipped with Aegis complexes. However, in a real operation will not do without certain problems.

The authors of the article suggest that the US Navy can hardly count on the interception of Russian Backfire aircraft before they launch their missiles. The reason for this is the insufficient flight speed of the F / A-18E / F fighter jets, which simply do not have time to reach the interception line. For this reason, ships and aircraft will have to deal with already launched X-32 missiles.

It is proposed to shoot down X-32 flying at safe distances from ships using AIM-120В AMRAAM aircraft missiles and ship-based SM-6 anti-aircraft missiles. The authors call these missiles excellent and believe that they are capable of hitting approaching Russian weapons.

However, as noted by The National Interest, the problems for the US Navy are not only in the modernized Russian aircraft with the latest weapons. Currently, the People’s Liberation Army of China is deploying similar systems in the Pacific. They will also be a danger to the American fleet.

Ultimately, by the thirties, the United States Navy will be forced to develop an entirely new carrier-based fighter, whose task will be to protect aircraft carriers and other ships from modern anti-ship weapons of leading foreign countries.

The events of the recent past and the foreseeable future led the editors of The National Interest to not very optimistic conclusions. It turns out that the threat in the form of a probable enemy bombers, absent for a quarter of a century, is returning.

***

It is noteworthy that the Russian Tu-22М3 bomber and its upgraded version М3М is not the first time that the topic of the publication of The National Interest, expressing fears. For example, at the end of December last year, an article appeared titled “The Tu-22M3: The Russian Bomber of the World Truly Fears” - “Tu-22М3: Russian bomber that the world really fears.” It considered story of this aircraft, its influence on American doctrine and recent news about the combat use and further development of technology.

Shortly before the publication of this article in the Russian press, there were reports of the completion of the design of the updated Tu-22М3М. In addition, then some technical features of this project became known. It was alleged that repair and modernization of the front-line equipment would begin in 2018. Particular attention of The National Interest naturally attracted data on the modernization of the weapons complex.

The publication wrote that some aspects of modernization aimed at preserving the broad "traditional" capabilities of the bomber. In particular, the system "Hephaestus" will allow him to effectively use free-falling bombs. At the same time, the possibility of the Tu-22M3М working as a carrier of strategic weapons was provided. For example, in terms of on-board equipment, such an aircraft is unified with the strategic missile carrier Tu-160М2.

It was indicated that a new cruise missile X-22 with a firing range of up to 3 km will be included in the Tu-32М600М munitions nomenclature. The possibility of using a promising X-SD, allegedly being developed on the basis of the existing X-55, was also mentioned. Such a product with a range of up to 2000 km, presumably, could carry a special warhead. As a result, the Tu-22М3М aircraft, having received such weapons, could replenish the fleet of strategic bombers of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

At the beginning of June, however, the concern of foreign authors was connected only with the X-32 multi-purpose missile, suitable for attacking ships and ground targets. Their pessimistic mood intensified due to the modernization of aircraft carrying such weapons. Judging by the available data, the Tu-22М3М bomber strike complex and the X-32 cruise missile can indeed be particularly dangerous for ship formations or land facilities.

There is reason to expect that in the very near future new articles may appear in the foreign press with fears in the context of the Tu-22М3М project. The fact is that a few weeks ago it became known about the desire of the Russian Ministry of Defense to return to operation the outdated X-22 missiles. Such products in the past were the basis of the Tu-22М3 bomber ammunition, but later lost their potential. They are physically outdated, their onboard equipment has not met the current requirements for a long time, and the operation was extremely difficult, as a result of which the missiles were used less and less.

According to recent reports, several dozen X-22 missiles will be removed from storage and will be sent for modernization. They will retain the airframe and power plant, and the standard onboard equipment will give way to new instruments. With this modernization, modern control systems can be used, created for the latest X-32 rocket. As a result, aerospace forces will receive a specific weapon, combining flight data of an outdated missile and combat capabilities of a completely new one. It is obvious that such weapons will attract the attention of foreign experts and will definitely become the “hero” of publications in the press.

Russian armed forces are developing due to the appearance of new types of weapons and equipment, as well as through various modernization projects. The next program of updating the existing aircraft will soon lead to the appearance of Tu-22М3М bombers armed with the new X-32 rocket. As the National Interest rightly points out, the threat to the ships of the likely enemy has returned. And along with it, there were also risks for land facilities.

The article “Meet Russia's Tu-22M3 Backfire, The Bomber That Could Sink a Navy Aircraft Carrier”:
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/meet-russias-tu-22m3-backfire-the-bomber-could-sink-navy-26137
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    7 June 2018 15: 32
    Well, you don’t need to drown it ... The whole AUG turns into a pleasure fleet after a fire occurs on the take-off deck or some other nuisance ....
    1. 0
      7 June 2018 21: 43
      Quote: Vard
      or some other nuisance

      Safety corn grate?
    2. +2
      8 June 2018 06: 29
      Well, you don’t need to drown it ... The whole AUG turns into a pleasure fleet after a fire occurs on the take-off deck or some other nuisance ....

      You must Fedya, you must. negative
    3. 0
      8 June 2018 09: 57
      A laser pulse from orbit is sufficient for this.
  2. +18
    7 June 2018 15: 33
    The plane is good, but who will display it on the AUG? How will target designation be carried out? A couple of years ago there was an article on this subject in which the author (unfortunately I do not remember his last name) pointed out the difficulties of detecting augs in the ocean and target designation for missiles. In the USSR there were special satellites, and scouts constantly flew, but now this is all gone. sad
    1. +2
      8 June 2018 10: 04
      AUG on the air screams so that it can be heard on the other side of the globe ... So everyone who needs to know where this heap of scrap metal roams ...
    2. +2
      8 June 2018 20: 50
      Quote: Magic Archer
      There were special satellites in the USSR, and scouts constantly flew, but now this is not all. sad

      ========
      Are you SURE ????
  3. +4
    7 June 2018 15: 35
    Are there many 22 left? They were even taken away from the fleet.
    1. +2
      7 June 2018 16: 13
      In airworthiness about 50
  4. +5
    7 June 2018 16: 00
    Among other things, the modernized aircraft should receive a new X-32 long-range supersonic missile. The authors believe that after such an update, the bomber will again become a threat to various objects of the North Atlantic region, as it was in the past, during the Cold War. It is expected that the upgraded aircraft with new weapons will arrive in the aerospace forces in October this year.

    And now all the X-22s are being upgraded to the X-32 level, since the missiles are identical in size. That is, in fact, for the new TU-22M3M there is already an arsenal that is much easier to upgrade than to build from scratch.
    1. 0
      7 June 2018 18: 09
      Quote: NEXUS
      Among other things, the modernized aircraft should receive a new X-32 long-range supersonic missile. The authors believe that after such an update, the bomber will again become a threat to various objects of the North Atlantic region, as it was in the past, during the Cold War. It is expected that the upgraded aircraft with new weapons will arrive in the aerospace forces in October this year.

      And now all the X-22s are being upgraded to the X-32 level, since the missiles are identical in size. That is, in fact, for the new TU-22M3M there is already an arsenal that is much easier to upgrade than to build from scratch.

      They are not identical in size, but use the same housing. Only the "filling" is different.
      1. +1
        8 June 2018 20: 55
        Quote: ALEXXX1983
        They are not identical in size, but use the same housing. Only the "filling" is different.

        =========
        I apologize, of course .... But did you understand what you said ???
        "They are" not identical in size, "but use"the same case "??? .....
        This is the same "one and the same case" may have a "different sizes" ??? fool
        1. 0
          8 June 2018 22: 38
          Quote: venik
          Quote: ALEXXX1983
          They are not identical in size, but use the same housing. Only the "filling" is different.

          =========
          I apologize, of course .... But did you understand what you said ???
          "They are" not identical in size, "but use"the same case "??? .....
          This is the same "one and the same case" may have a "different sizes" ??? fool

          I understand that, but you do not. hi
          I didn’t write “but use” (like yours), but “use”.
          That is, the meaning of my post is this:
          They are not (simple) identical in size, but use the same housing.
  5. +5
    7 June 2018 17: 48
    "Such missiles can also be used to destroy ground targets in Europe."
    Still would explain why the heck is that Europe to us? laughing
    1. +1
      7 June 2018 18: 54
      Under these machines, you can hang almost any cruise missiles and use them everywhere, not just in the geyrop.
    2. 0
      9 June 2018 07: 57
      Quote: Doliva63
      Still would explain why the heck is that Europe to us?


      In Geyrop, the base of our esteemed strip partners!
  6. +12
    7 June 2018 19: 21
    At first glance at the article I thought - Damantsev. But no, Ryabov.

    I have not read the article, but I think that the author is poorly familiar with the topic, or cynically misleads the readers. To quote NI is the destiny of the unworthy. And TU-22M3, if the aircraft carrier sinks, it’s only his own. He won’t get to another, and if he gets, he won’t.
    1. avt
      +2
      7 June 2018 20: 26
      Quote: sabotage
      At first glance at the article I thought - Damantsev. But no, Ryabov.

      Well, for the sake of justice - Cyril has just charted their National Interest. So to the question of
      Quote: sabotage
      that the author is poorly familiar with the topic, or cynically misleads readers.

      This is for the Yankees. They painted the long-suffering ,, Grena "as a terrible wunderwaffe, so much so that with Tu, it’s just right for the aircraft carriers to drown them at the piers. wassat
      1. +1
        7 June 2018 21: 37
        Quote: avt
        only charted their National Interest.

        Since when has National Interest become theirs? This is the Russian media in which the Americans work.
    2. +1
      8 June 2018 06: 36
      I have not read the article, but I think that the author is poorly familiar with the topic, or cynically misleads the readers. To quote NI is the destiny of the unworthy. And TU-22M3, if the aircraft carrier sinks, it’s only his own. He won’t get to another, and if he gets, he won’t.

      Saboteurs to the tribunal and to the wall, there, and will count how many grams he will get.
      1. 0
        8 June 2018 08: 16
        Quote: Ros 56
        Saboteurs to the tribunal and to the wall, there, and will count how many grams he will get.

        I will sit in the tribunal, and you are on the couch.
        Quote: avt
        Well, for the sake of justice - Cyril has just charted their National Interest.

        Could not read, and not to level.
        1. 0
          8 June 2018 08: 22
          I will sit in the tribunal, and you are on the couch.

          Whoever doubts, I'm on the couch, and you're right, in the tribunal on death row. bully
    3. +1
      8 June 2018 21: 04
      Quote: sabotage
      And TU-22M3, if the aircraft carrier sinks, it’s only his own. He won’t get to another, and if he gets, he won’t.

      ========
      There are no words! - Some "comments" .... But since ALL THEY UNCENSORAL........ Better to "refrain" (and so already "bans" .... request )
  7. +2
    7 June 2018 21: 17
    Tu-22M3 will sink your aircraft carrier

    The aircraft carrier also does not float alone, and just doesn’t drown him. After the first US strike on our airfields, how many TU-22 can take off, effectively shoot at the target, how many X-32 missiles are in service. The aircraft carrier group is a whole complex, and what Tu-22 greatly scares Americans I strongly doubt
    1. +1
      8 June 2018 00: 53
      Do they have the Navy at all or do they first need to be begged from the astronauts?
  8. +2
    7 June 2018 21: 43
    Among other things, the modernized aircraft should receive a new X-32 long-range supersonic missile. The authors believe that after such an update, the bomber will again become a threat to various objects of the North Atlantic region, as it was in the past, during the Cold War.
    And if you also return the module for refueling "back" - then finally ... wassat
    1. 0
      9 June 2018 18: 31
      Quote: Radikal
      And if you also return the module for refueling "back" - then finally ..

      Admit it, he filmed the refueling system himself?
  9. +3
    8 June 2018 00: 54
    The problem of drowning an aircraft carrier begins with the problem of detecting it
    1. +1
      8 June 2018 18: 19
      if it approaches a couple of thousand kilometers, it is detected by over-the-horizon radars, and then it’s not necessary - there is no danger from its air wing ... request
      1. +2
        8 June 2018 20: 50
        Quote: ser56
        if it approaches a couple of thousand kilometers, it is detected by over-the-horizon radars, and then it’s not necessary - there is no danger from its air wing ...

        Of course it shows up. Then MiG-31s ​​with daggers take off from the base, shoot them at target designation with an over-the-horizon radar, and hypersonic aeroballistic missiles carry the aircraft carrier to hell. And then you wake up ...
        1. 0
          9 June 2018 10: 04
          And at what height the opponent is at that time ... he is not a woodpecker and approximately knows the possibilities of an over-the-horizon radar. Think their scalpel will go to the stratosphere ??? Watch a video of his work at ultra-low altitudes, in the mode of enveloping the terrain --- FUN.
        2. 0
          9 June 2018 15: 40
          you have strange allusions ... bully
  10. 0
    9 June 2018 09: 59
    The USSR was ABLE to do brutal things that in appearance, that in striking power ... that the Air Force, that the Navy ... SILHOUETTES ARE SONG.
  11. 0
    9 June 2018 10: 36
    The most beautiful aircraft of our VKS !! IMHO of course, but also no. Let it always come out victorious so that there it is not suspended ...
  12. +1
    9 June 2018 15: 29
    The plane was outstanding for its time. It was not in vain that he became the subject of fierce disputes at the talks between the USSR and NATO on arms limitation as a result of which the performance characteristics of the aircraft were greatly reduced (the aircraft was deprived of the possibility of refueling in the air than was transferred from a strategic weapon to an operational tactical one. On the other hand, it was gone and it was It would be more useful to invest already quite limited means in the creation of new technology.
    Interest NI is also understandable. NI needs to intimidate its readers with the “Russian threat” as much as possible and to raise funds to finance the creation of modern carrier-based aircraft that would be able to effectively replace the departed F 14 Tomcat and E3 Viking. Point.
  13. 0
    9 June 2018 18: 28
    Guys, you did not see the main thing in this article - Tu22 is the prototype of the spacecraft Luke Skywalker ... Take a look at the photo, there is R2D2 sitting behind the cockpit.
  14. +2
    10 June 2018 00: 58
    The article is informative in nature and some “couch strategists” are hardly worth blaming the author for insufficient knowledge of the topic.
    Let's talk about something else. To date, the AUGs are not the potential for a first nuclear strike. They can be delivered by the USS and their allies (Great Britain, France), possessing for this purpose land and sea-based ballistic missiles. These funds can be covertly and in advance deployed into a combat position. AUGs are dangerous, but they do not possess such secrecy. In modern conditions, their movement is detected and, therefore, all types of reconnaissance equipment and submarine missile cruisers "graze" them in places of constant basing and upon leaving them, abroad of territorial waters.

    A Tu-22 with an X-22 missile can theoretically hit an aircraft carrier only if it launches a missile beyond the reach of an air defense order. Already in Soviet times, a solo car could not do it and it was envisaged to strike with “waves”. For this, up to 3 air regiments were allocated, i.e. approximately 90-100 vehicles, of which most will be shot down on the way to the target, and those that survive and can strike are doomed anyway, because at this time, on land, the fire of a nuclear war will already be blazing with might and main, and they will simply have nowhere to return.
    Today, there is practically no MPA. Why then reanimate the TU-22 as a missile carrier. The fact is that, depending on the theater of operations (theater of operations), its range and speed make it possible to hit targets in Europe and Southeast Asia. Refueling issues in the air are resolved depending on the location of the used airbase. If necessary, sometimes crews have to make a “hook” in order to reach the goal from the most advantageous direction, “from where they least expect you” (to pass over the territory of other states). I think that nuclear war in Europe is almost impossible. NATO will not go to it, but a war with the use of non-nuclear weapons will also lead to mass casualties and irreversible consequences. Imagine what a missile attack from the air will lead to industrial and political-administrative centers, nuclear power facilities, hydraulic structures, etc., etc. In a word, the TU-22 missile carrier acts as a “baton” for “hot heads” or, in scientific terms, an additional means of deterrence. These cars are few, but so far they are still there.
    1. +1
      26 September 2018 19: 21
      I completely agree with you about the defeat of targets in Southeast Asia and Europe, especially since there are plenty of potential targets there. Just what are the numerous bases of the Americans. Plus a huge number of industrial facilities, etc. etc. Really an additional deterrent. But all this is relevant only if the Kh-32 is "taught" to accurately hit stationary objects.
      But about the AUG ...
      It is clear that earlier there were calculations of 90-100 aircraft for the AUG, since less than half would have flown and they would have “carried” at best 2 X-22s (but in reality, probably 1). Therefore, a salvo of 40-50 missiles was obtained at best. But now times are different. There are no Tomkats, there is nothing to meet the Tu-22 on the distant approaches. Yes, and the X-32 now - our Carcasses do not really need to get closer to the AUG. And if so, then you do not need to fly for a long time, fuel economy. Therefore, you can take more X-32. Maybe then 20 Carcasses will be enough for AUG? winked In any case, the Tu-22M3M with the X-32, in my opinion, gets new opportunities
  15. 0
    10 June 2018 12: 05
    Quote: 4-th Paradise
    Quote: Radikal
    And if you also return the module for refueling "back" - then finally ..

    Admit it, he filmed the refueling system himself?

    I’ll tell you in secret, only ts-ss wink , to anyone - Gorbachev "shot", did not listen to me! wassat lol
  16. +1
    10 June 2018 17: 50
    Quote: sabotage
    At first glance at the article I thought - Damantsev. But no, Ryabov.

    I have not read the article, but I think that the author is poorly familiar with the topic, or cynically misleads the readers. To quote NI is the destiny of the unworthy. And TU-22M3, if the aircraft carrier sinks, it’s only his own. He won’t get to another, and if he gets, he won’t.

    continue the analogy: And if he gets, then he won’t drown. And if he drowns, then not all. Bottom line: the author of the post considers the modern aircraft carrier an analog of unsinkable brown substance.
    1. -1
      12 August 2018 01: 08
      Quote: sabotage
      that the author is little familiar with the topic

      Quote: Fil743
      continue the analogy

      In the days of the USSR, losses were estimated during an attack on the enemy’s AUG in two or three regiments. Like this...
      1. +2
        12 August 2018 02: 04
        Quote: region58
        In Soviet times, losses were estimated upon attack on the enemy’s AUG in two or three regiments. Like this...

        ... not really.

        Operation to destroy AUG was considered successful if losses were

        Quote: SSI
        Division, 2-3 regiments ...

        1. 0
          12 August 2018 02: 17
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          yes not really.

          I agree, unsuccessfully formulated. However, the essence does not change: a massive MPA strike with the use of nuclear warheads was assumed, and losses were also assumed to be rather big.
          You can also see here: https://topwar.ru/24349-tu-95-cel-amerika-chast-2.html
          PS It looks like there are still "glitches" after the update, comments seem to come in private messages, I answered you in personal messages - in general, my answer disappeared ...
          PPS I do not understand - how to remove the text under the spoiler here? Manually write tags?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"