NATO: Russia has violated parity in the Black Sea region

59
The actions of the Russian military in the Black Sea violates the previously achieved equilibrium in this region, reports TASS Statement by the Special Representative of the NATO Secretary General for Central Asia and the Caucasus, James Appathurai.





Speaking on Tuesday to the participants of the forum dedicated to security in the Atlantic and the Black Sea region, Appaturai noted that after the Crimea was incorporated into the Russian Federation on the peninsula, “a lot of military equipment” was deployed.

According to him, all this has changed the balance in the region.

The representative of the alliance also said that the security of the Black Sea is closely linked to North Atlantic security.

He recalled that NATO will apply to Moscow an approach involving military deterrence and negotiations from a position of strength. The last meeting in the framework of the NATO-Russia Council Appathurai called "quite positive."

“Some progress has been made in the negotiations,” he noted. But hoping for a constructive dialogue, the alliance should not forget about defense, which must be strengthened in a “proportionate” manner, the NATO spokesman added.

Previously, Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that he needed to learn how to manage relations with Moscow. According to him, at the next NATO summit to be held in July, the leaders of the allied countries should support a dual approach to the Russian Federation.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    6 June 2018 13: 47
    The actions of the Russian military in the Black Sea upset the previously achieved balance in this region, reports TASS the statement of the Special Representative of NATO Secretary General for Central Asia and the Caucasus, James Appathurai.

    ... NATO’s little arms reach out to the Black Sea ... the bummer of your gentleman is uttermost, because you cannot see superiority in this sea like your ears without a mirror ...
    1. +9
      6 June 2018 13: 51
      ... statement by the special representative of the NATO Secretary General in Central Asia and the Caucasus by James Appathurai.


      Already sounds ridiculous .. where is NATO and where is Central Asia and the Caucasus ?? !!!! But there is a special representative !!! wassat
      ...
      1. HAM
        +12
        6 June 2018 13: 55
        Wait, soon they will organize a "NATO Special Representative" in the Crimea (in exile.
        1. +2
          6 June 2018 14: 33
          James Appathurai, the Special Representative of NATO Secretary General for Central Asia and the Caucasus, has again started his philosophizing about what should be primary in politics - the Russian “egg” in the Russian Crimea or the American “chicken” in the Black Sea ?! Or vice versa.

          REFERENCE
          James Appathurai (born James Appathurai; genus 7 August 1968, Toronto) is a Canadian journalist and former NATO spokesperson. He is currently the Special Representative of NATO Secretary General for the Transcaucasus and Central Asia. Born in Toronto, Canada, holds degrees from the University of Toronto and the University of Amsterdam.
      2. +6
        6 June 2018 13: 58
        NATO created in 1949 may soon cease to exist. Block faced serious internal problems. They are connected with the desire of the EU to create its own military organization, an analogue of NATO.

        At the end of 2017, the European Council approved a new defense program called PESCO. 25 countries have joined the program, including Germany and France. It is officially proclaimed that this organization will not be a competitor to NATO, but there is a different opinion.

        European states no longer want to pay 2% of GDP to the alliance’s budget, as Washington requires. Another reason is the EU’s dissatisfaction with Trump’s policy towards Iran. Due to US sanctions, European business could suffer huge losses. Wait and see.
        1. +4
          6 June 2018 14: 13
          Quote: dorz
          NATO may soon cease to exist.

          Where would such happiness come from? laughing I thought you were older to believe in such "Wishlist."
          There are no prerequisites for this. On the contrary, the number of warriors and conflicts around the world will grow. And military organizations will be in demand. And the number of people wishing to join NATO is not reduced tongue
      3. +1
        6 June 2018 14: 05
        Quote: Nasr
        Already sounds ridiculous .. where is NATO and where is Central Asia and the Caucasus ?? !!!!

        Duc to them in nature, Qatar asks laughing
      4. +9
        6 June 2018 14: 12
        I wonder why the state of the Russian Defense Ministry has not yet introduced the post of military commandant of London and military commandant of Washington? am
        And not just formally, but the commandants appointed to the post are not sent to the place of new service in London and Washington, respectively! am
      5. +2
        6 June 2018 21: 19
        Quote: Nasr
        and where central Asia and the Caucasus ?? !!!!

        It has always been Central Asia, and for some reason it has become Central. A tribute to fashion, or Western influence?
    2. +10
      6 June 2018 14: 00
      Russia violated parity in the Black Sea region

      And no one promised them goats that there would be parity. Especially if they support a "dual approach to the Russian Federation."
      1. +2
        6 June 2018 14: 02
        a squeak about parity at the time when 16 geese at the border are running around with guns in the Baltic exercises - this is a brain disease
      2. +3
        6 June 2018 14: 06
        Quote: Hire
        Especially if they support a "dual approach to the Russian Federation."

        then you need to create a triple advantage in the region
      3. +3
        6 June 2018 14: 25
        What did you want ?, this is NATO, they can say this about the Caspian and Baikal
    3. +7
      6 June 2018 14: 05
      Appathurai noted that after the Crimea entered the Russian Federation, "a lot of military equipment" was transferred to the peninsula.

      On our territory we place at least a public toilet, at least a combined army.
      He recalled that NATO will apply an approach to Moscow that provides for military deterrence and negotiations from a position of strength

      Sterosov’s club would better remember how this approach ended for Napoleon and Hitler.
      1. +5
        6 June 2018 14: 15
        Bored and uncomfortable became them in this region.
        1. +4
          6 June 2018 14: 18
          What parity can NATO talk about in the Russian Sea?
  2. +8
    6 June 2018 13: 50
    But do Motherboards do not upset the balance of power in the Gulf of Mexico.
    1. 0
      6 June 2018 13: 54
      They violate a lot of things and where, only our government shows its concern in words.
    2. +1
      6 June 2018 14: 28
      There their territory is like our World Cup!
      1. +1
        6 June 2018 20: 19
        Appathurai noted that after the Crimea entered the Russian Federation, “a lot of military equipment was transferred to the peninsula

        And to his great regret - not a single set of lace panties feel
        according to NATO, this seriously violates the coward’s circuit in nature wassat
        1. 0
          7 June 2018 15: 20
          I’ll clarify: “cowardice in nature.”
  3. +1
    6 June 2018 13: 53
    "... that after the Crimea entered the Russian Federation," a lot of military equipment was transferred to the peninsula ... "

    Heh, if they hadn’t done this, then the Maidan people were doing garbage in the Crimea and not only ...
    Especially within our border, we can do anything, even walk on our ears, and do not care about the left opinion of the nats from a high mountain.
    1. +4
      6 June 2018 14: 09
      Igor, well, first of all, NATA didn’t think so (what we can do within our borders, whatever), they generally did not consider us a serious player in the Black Sea basin (to the Crimea), rather, an annoying, temporary misunderstanding, but secondly, in Constanta and Varna they are always glad to see the ships of mattress-beds, and their dogs, all sorts of huskies (France, Great Britain). Here, only, to the annoyance of the gentlemen from Fashington, Crimea, the dog turned out to be Russian. All plans - to hell. Sadness, however, for the wet dreams of Americans.
  4. +10
    6 June 2018 13: 54
    after the Crimea entered the Russian Federation “a lot of military equipment” was transferred to the peninsula

    our land, as much as we want and wherever we want, we move there ... so wipe it off ...
    1. +2
      6 June 2018 14: 28
      Marisha! love Whose cow would mumble about "violations", and the NATO and especially the mattress would be silent. negative soldier
      1. +3
        6 June 2018 14: 34
        Those. prepare your denyushki and buy, from the striped ones, the elements of this same “equilibrium”!
        Such a direct hint / indication to their smaller brothers from the same, Black Sea region!
        Everything is clear.
        1. +4
          6 June 2018 14: 40
          In their desire to cut dibs from any event, the mattresses surpassed even comrades who were extremely unloved by Iran. wink
          1. +1
            6 June 2018 15: 12
            Greed, she is immense!
            On the other hand, the right of the strong try to challenge him?
            It is heard immediately in the air - Then we go to YOU! -
            1. +1
              6 June 2018 15: 14
              Favorite scheme, repeatedly worked out ... sad
              1. +1
                6 June 2018 15: 22
                Yes, yes, the scheme is still the same ... either the flower garden in your garden will be divorced, your own!
                Or sounds from the sky are heard ... flying rockets and planes!
  5. +6
    6 June 2018 13: 55
    But is it not a NATO sly face that has violated the agreement on a demilitarized zone on the territory of the Warsaw Pact countries? ... As a result, a heavy bolt has been put on the NATO opinion. Russia is only returning parity with NATO in this region, but has not yet reached it ...
    1. +4
      6 June 2018 14: 36
      And who will cheat on that face !!! It’s clear, right along that brazen red \ striped face! angry
      1. +3
        6 June 2018 14: 38
        Quote: rocket757
        And who will cheat on that face !!! It’s clear, right along that brazen red \ striped face! angry

        Is this Chubais or something? Let him give two of my Volga. laughing
        1. +2
          6 June 2018 15: 15
          Well frame! Well, nowhere without him, red-headed, insolent, can not do!
          Only he seemed to sing about one Volga? What you petty, with interest do you want?
          1. +2
            6 June 2018 15: 25
            Quote: rocket757
            Only he seemed to sing about one Volga?

            No, about two. I remember evrything. For one voucher - two Volga. negative laughing By the way, some guy sued these two Volga, he just did not get anything.
            1. +2
              6 June 2018 15: 38
              And it was necessary to start with the process of tail clamping or something else, no less sensitive, with a DOOR!
  6. +4
    6 June 2018 13: 56
    That is what Crimea Ukrainians and the USA were preparing for. There, the US bases were to be located at 4 points. What kind of violation are we talking about. In Crimea, we had 26 airfields, an RSDN system, more than 30 radar stations, and much more. From the post on Ay Petri, I could easily see the Turkish coast. I will not give other data. Crimea is the original Russian land, also eae Odessa, Kheson.
  7. +1
    6 June 2018 14: 13
    Crimea is Russian again, and this, in their opinion, violates the Balance, I want to ask the balance of what? The one that the West itself installed? Now the balance is just what you need! No FIG NATO was crawling to the borders of Russia.
  8. +2
    6 June 2018 14: 28
    From a position of strength does not work already? Ai-yi-yay what a misfortune ... Well, pick up the strength, and we'll see ... laughing
  9. +2
    6 June 2018 14: 38
    Again, this statement is not surprising. We flew on sanctions, we need to win back our positions on something. An attempt to spin another spiral in the style: "KARAUL RUSSIAN GO!" They have already lost their influence in the Black Sea, now they will go out of their way to spoil us, such as another redistribution: "SOUTH FLOW", Pressure on its participants, and then Svidomo brothers with their paper ambitions. In general, the USA, these bastards are cunning and, as time has shown, they are crushed by intellect. If there weren’t Russia, they would have come up with another horror story for wringing money from their partners.
  10. +2
    6 June 2018 15: 03
    Personally, in his words it bothers me
    He recalled that NATO will take an approach to Moscow, providing for military deterrence and negotiations from a position of strength. Appathurai called the last meeting in the framework of the NATO-Russia Council "quite positive."


    and here it is
    In negotiations “some progress” madehe noted.


    I would like to understand where this optimism comes from, and what kind of “some progress” it is?
    1. 0
      7 June 2018 11: 21
      Quote: crashing
      I would like to understand where this optimism comes from, and what kind of “some progress” it is?

      In diplomatic language, the phrase "Some progress has been made in the negotiations" should be understood as "it won’t reach the war in the coming days"
  11. +3
    6 June 2018 15: 03
    But the ground-based missile defense systems of the "third position area" in Romania did not upset the "balance" in the Black Sea region? Aren't the MK-41 universal launchers capable of launching cruise missile cruise missiles?
  12. 0
    6 June 2018 15: 14
    This "Moskvich" on the screen saver with its appearance has already intimidated the unfortunate NAT ..
    1. 0
      6 June 2018 16: 17
      This is a typical Russian marine.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        7 June 2018 15: 30
        Quote: infantryman2020
        This is a typical Russian marine.

        horror story for Bander logs - they always call us "Mongolok-c-pami " laughing
  13. 0
    6 June 2018 15: 17
    On its territory, Russia has the right to do what it considers necessary to ensure its security. This NATO is creeping closer and closer to the borders of Russia, and not a turn.
  14. +2
    6 June 2018 15: 54
    Quote: aszzz888
    The actions of the Russian military in the Black Sea upset the previously achieved balance in this region, reports TASS the statement of the Special Representative of NATO Secretary General for Central Asia and the Caucasus, James Appathurai.

    ... NATO’s little arms reach out to the Black Sea ... the bummer of your gentleman is uttermost, because you cannot see superiority in this sea like your ears without a mirror ...

    And why should they be drawn when, out of 6 countries of the Black Sea basin, 3 enter NATO. What about superiority in this sea? Take a look at the Turkish Navy in this region. Their fleet will certainly be stronger than our Black Sea. Well, or at least equal. Plus ships of Bulgaria and Romania. In any case, we do not have superiority in the Black Sea. Do not entertain yourself with illusions

    Quote: Nasr
    ... statement by the special representative of the NATO Secretary General in Central Asia and the Caucasus by James Appathurai.

    Already sounds ridiculous .. where is NATO and where is Central Asia and the Caucasus ?? !!!! But there is a special representative !!! wassat
    ...


    And what, much time is left before Georgia joins NATO? Here you have the Caucasus. And Central Asia is a distant prospect, but they are already preparing for this. On the one hand, they created an appropriate structure, on the other hand, they begin to court the countries of the Central Asian region. The time passed when the North Atlantic countries entered NATO, and NATO was called the organization of the North Atlantic bloc

    Quote: Sergey39
    What parity can NATO talk about in the Russian Sea?

    And does someone in the world recognize the status of the Russian Sea for the Black Sea? Or live the memories of distant ages?

    Quote: st2st
    and their dogs, all sorts of sheluponi (France, Great Britain)

    Strongly said. Are you the two nuclear powers that you consider to be a husk, and what is more, in terms of economic potential, those that are already superior to our Russia?

    Quote: Alex-a832
    But is it not a NATO cunning face that violated the agreement on a demilitarized zone on the territory of the Warsaw Pact countries? ...

    Was there such an agreement? Or were there just the words whether Kolya or Thatcher said to Gorbochev that NATO would not expand to the East. Words, not signed agreements. So they shook us like suckers, thanks to "dear Mikhail Sergeyevich"
    As for the Crimea, they certainly say it in vain. If they adhered to the provisions of the Helsinki Agreement on the OSCE, then we could also make claims against us. And since all the documents of this agreement have sunk into oblivion, incl. and agreements on flank restrictions, there is nothing to say now about what we did wrong on our own territory. The train left, gentlemen, and you yourself made it leave without passengers
  15. +1
    6 June 2018 16: 56
    Russia “violated” parity on the Black Sea in its favor as 300 years ago, i.e. when nobody heard about the USA and NATO. In addition, Russia has repeatedly proved that there is nothing better than the existing parity and cannot be.
  16. +1
    6 June 2018 17: 09
    "NATO: Russia violated parity in the Black Sea region"
    - Violated or did not violate, - and this "question" is not a matter of the NATO mind. Get out! - NATO - NORTH ATLANTIC bloc! For interference in our affairs NATO will be hurt!
  17. 0
    6 June 2018 17: 20
    How unpleasant it is to realize that some kind of fools from abroad have views on the benefit of containment measures, the border of which passes between the two Slavic peoples along the original Russian territory.
  18. +1
    6 June 2018 18: 17
    Well, they are hypocrites and arrogant, they still have to look for such. But they did not violate parity when they included a number of countries into NATO members and advanced to our borders ?!
  19. 0
    6 June 2018 18: 46
    and he wouldn’t go on foot, our black sea, and the point ...
  20. 0
    6 June 2018 19: 37
    Actually, NATO is a North Atlantic alliance, and a military one, so let them communicate with whales in the Greenland region. This is the first. Second, you need to make them understand, and in all seriousness, politics is not your dog thing, but you will twitch in our seas, you will communicate with the sea king, he has been waiting for you at the bottom for a long time.
  21. 0
    6 June 2018 21: 56
    And do you actually need to do it there? And you would not go to x ......
  22. +1
    6 June 2018 22: 55
    Nice to hear that.
    Off topic: to give all our pensioners a free ticket in the summer or autumn to the Crimea! I would have forgiven much of our powerful kleptomaniacs for such a step! And so that all the children from Russia there to recover in the summer. Oh, ma!
  23. 0
    7 June 2018 15: 00
    Russia will change equilibrium in the Black Sea from NATO to equilibrium off the US coast. And he will talk to them from a position of strength.
  24. 0
    8 July 2018 06: 07
    Quote: kefan
    Well, they are hypocrites and arrogant, they still have to look for such. But they did not violate parity when they included a number of countries into NATO members and advanced to our borders ?!

    ... I am surprised at one thing - how * this victim of a drunken midwife - a bear * labeled * could fool A. Gromyko - he * godfather * of this - he swore a tooth for him in the Supreme Council ..
  25. 0
    9 July 2018 20: 19
    Black Sea security is closely linked to North Atlantic security.
    where is the north atlantic and where is the black sea? !!!!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"