Reply to Washington: Iran has declared its readiness to resume uranium enrichment

Representing the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Behruz Kamalvandi said today that Iran has prepared a response to the unilateral US withdrawal from the so-called “nuclear agreement”. In an interview with the ISNA information service, Kamalvandi noted that the agency he represents prepared a letter addressed to the head of the IAEA. What is this letter about?

The idea is that Tehran plans to return to work on enriching uranium for its needs. It is noted that Iran will launch centrifuges for the production of uranium fluoride.

Recall that earlier work on the enrichment of uranium in the Islamic Republic of Iran was frozen due to the signing of a well-known multilateral agreement. However, in early May, Donald Trump announced that the United States was withdrawing from the agreement, adding that it was not in the long-term interests of the United States in the region. The US also decided to link up with the “nuclear” agreement also Iran’s missile program, which was not discussed at all in the agreement.

Official Iran threatened to retaliate if the United States did not give up its decision to cancel the deal.

Washington left the termination in force, and therefore Iran, reserving the right to reply, decided to declare that it would resume uranium enrichment on its territory. Receipt of letters from Tehran to the IAEA has not yet been confirmed.

Comments

[Teberii]

There is a reason, it remains a chemical weapon and come up with genocide. Eun is likely to bring this up to his meeting with Trump.

[siberalt]

Our military asked Tehran to make our jump airfield there, did not agree. Now maybe the thing will move.

[just exp]

Now the question is different - do we need it?
the Iranians thought too much of themselves.
let them go down from heaven first.

[The black]

I have already said that only US policy pushes countries such as Iran and the DPRK to try to create nuclear weapons. Already who contributes to the spread of nuclear weapons - these are the Americans.

[bouncyhunter]

But in general: who gave the USA the right to decide who should have nuclear weapons, and who should not? Again "self-assignment"?

[The black]

Quote: bouncyhunter

But in general: who gave the USA the right to decide who should have nuclear weapons, and who should not? Again "self-assignment"

No, Paul. There are five nuclear powers in the world: the United States, Russia, Great Britain, France and China, which possessed it BEFORE signing the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. The rest - India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, according to this agreement, possess it illegally. So here everything is true. Another thing is that the United States for some reason does not make claims to the same Israel or Pakistan .... however, it is understandable why. If Iran lay under the United States-then no problem ....

[LSA57]

Quote: Black

There are five nuclear powers in the world: the United States, Russia, Great Britain, France and China, which possessed it BEFORE signing the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

not so simple

March 5, 2015 marks the 45th anniversary of the entry into force of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The parties to the Treaty are 190 states. Outside are India, Pakistan, Israel, the DPRK announced its withdrawal from the Treaty.
The nuclear non-proliferation treaty was prepared by the UN disarmament committee. On June 12, 1968, it was approved by the UN General Assembly. At the same time in Moscow, Washington and London on July 1, 1968, the signing of the Treaty began. The agreement entered into force on March 5, 1970.

Ratified by the USSR on November 24, 1969. Since 1992, the assignee of the USSR for the implementation of the Treaty is the Russian Federation.

The parties to the Treaty are 190 states. The contract was not signed by India, Pakistan, Israel.

The DPRK announced its withdrawal from the NPT, however, many states proceed from the fact that the withdrawal was issued incorrectly from a legal point of view. The UN Secretariat continues to consider the DPRK as a party to the NPT.

so that work goes on

[bouncyhunter]

Glory, I am aware of the NPT, but why is the USA so concerned about the nuclear program of Iran and the DPRK and are not at all worried about Israel? What - bench press below the belt for their own jambs?

[Strips]

Quote: bouncyhunter

why exactly the US is so concerned about the nuclear program of Iran and the DPRK

Because these are dangerous countries.
Russia and China, together with the United States, imposed sanctions against the DPRK.

Iran sponsors terror, violates the Dayau, etc.

Quote: bouncyhunter

not worried about Israel? What - bench press below the belt for their own jambs?

But Israel did not sign the Dniao + Israel actually has every right to nuclear weapons as it managed to develop nuclear weapons before the Dniester.

Simply, if Israel recognizes the presence of nuclear weapons, then Muslim countries will also begin to develop it and an arms race will begin.

While Israel is in the shadow - Muslim countries are silent, but as soon as Israel leaves the shadow and declares to the whole world the right to nuclear weapons, the right that it has as the agreement establishes that the state that possesses nuclear weapons is the one that produced and detonated such a weapon or device until January 1, 1967. Israel already had nuclear weapons at that time, Muslims will not be able to stay on the sidelines and an arms race will begin, which no one needs and can lead to sad consequences.

[-Pollux]

Quote: Tiras

But Israel did not sign the Dniao + Israel actually has every right to nuclear weapons as it managed to develop nuclear weapons before the Dniester.

Any country can withdraw from the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, this does not justify Israel.

Quote: Tiras

Israel already had nuclear weapons at this time, Muslims will not be able to stay on the sidelines and an arms race will begin, which no one needs and can lead to sad consequences.

so let Israel give up nuclear weapons.

[Strips]

Quote: Pollux

Any country can withdraw from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty

Yes? And what are the exit rules?

Quote: Pollux

it does not justify Israel.

Does Israel need to make excuses?

Quote: Pollux

so let Israel give up nuclear weapons

When the United States and Russia set an example to the world, Israel will think about it.

[-Pollux]

Quote: Tiras

Yes? And what are the exit rules?

This is not a rule, it is a right.

Quote: Tiras

Does Israel need to make excuses?

You have to ask this - you justify it so fiercely!

Quote: Tiras

When the United States and Russia set an example to the world, Israel will think about it.

Well, why so brazenly lie? Of course, Israel will not think about giving up nuclear weapons, even if Jesus descends from heaven to you.

[dauria]

The rest - India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, according to this agreement, possess it illegally.

Illegally? And with what fright, the agreements of some countries become law for others? I don’t give a damn what the owners decided among themselves. Yes, and you can easily get out of all contracts, the United States will confirm.

[Topotun]

Legally-illegally, you did not pay attention to the fact that in the modern world there is no longer (practically) a concept of law? If a country is able to create nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles, it has in fact entered a club of countries that own these weapons, whether anyone likes it or not. At the same time, the presence of nuclear weapons in Israel, for some reason, is of little concern to the "democratic" world. Although, while the tendency for the use of armed forces by states (without regard to "laws") remains, it is quite possible to expect from them in the near future the use of tactical nuclear weapons to solve their tasks, for example, in the Middle East.

[Strips]

Iran signed the Dniao, received peaceful atom technology, training its personnel, etc., and then violated the Dniao.

It’s interesting, but if, for example, tomorrow the United States puts technologies and opportunities for creating nuclear weapons, for example, Georgia, Ukraine, etc. And they will put nuclear weapons near the borders with Russia.

What will Russia say? Or will you also say that having nuclear weapons is a personal right of states? Maybe for you, but many will disagree with you.

[The black]

It’s interesting, but if, for example, tomorrow the United States puts technologies and opportunities for creating nuclear weapons, for example, Georgia, Ukraine, etc. And they will put nuclear weapons near the borders with Russia.
What will Russia say?

It is interesting, but if, for example, tomorrow Russia puts the technology and capabilities for creating nuclear weapons, for example, Mexico, Cuba, etc. And they will put nuclear weapons near the borders with the United States.
What will the United States say?

[Strips]

Quote: Black

It is interesting, but if, for example, tomorrow Russia puts the technology and capabilities for creating nuclear weapons, for example, Mexico, Cuba, etc.

Here, Russia has problems - despite not tens of billions of debts written off, Cuba did not really help Russia settle down in Cuba. And Cuba will not allow Russia to host nuclear weapons, however, like Mexico.
They clearly lack Russian loyalty to do this.
So sorry, but the comparison is not entirely correct.

Quote: Black

What will the United States say?

If you argue in theory, then I talked about this - that is, the answer to the question of why the United States decides to be nuclear weapons to Iran or not - decides. Just as China, Russia decides, which many times voted at the UN together with the DPRK regarding the development of nuclear weapons.
There are red lines that neither the USA nor Russia cross.

Especially why the US cannot impose sanctions if they consider it necessary and consider that the agreement has been violated? This is the United States ultimately. If Europe is satisfied with losses from US sanctions, then this is Europe's business.

[75 hammer]

But what if we are in Palestine (Syria, Iran .... etc) and Mexico (Cuba, Venezuela ... etc)? Do you really believe that you write or fool around? And what do you say and will there be meaning in the conversations after that?

[abc_alex]

Not a single IAEA expert who has studied Iran’s nuclear facilities even hinted that Iran violated the NPT. Read the IAEA report, it clearly states that Iran has not even come close to such levels of enrichment that, at least theoretically, can make it possible to use it for military purposes. In the world, only two countries with the stubbornness of a furious woodpecker continue to accuse Iran of secret military nuclear programs - the United States and Israel. And absolutely unfounded and without evidence.

[Strips]

Quote: abc_alex

Not a single IAEA expert who has studied Iran’s nuclear facilities even hinted that Iran violated the NPT. Read the IAEA report, it clearly states that Iran has not even come close to such levels of enrichment,

At the same time, Magate himself claims that he can not gain access to suspicious objects.
And then what are the statements of these experts, if they do not have access, where do they want?

[abc_alex]

No, you compose. The IAEA official report clearly states that ALL objects of interest to experts were in full access. And the IAEA has officially and not once confirmed this. The "secret objects" of Iran’s nuclear program are mentioned only in statements by Israeli politicians and Israeli intelligence. And repeated by the shtatovtsami.

Statements by IAEA experts, by the way, are VERY expensive, because they put their signatures under the report, that is, their report is personified. This is a much more reliable source than the “intelligence data” used by Israeli politicians, and which no one has ever seen.

I’ll tell you more, the IAEA inspectors are even now at Iran’s nuclear facilities and are constantly monitoring the situation. And their activity causes absolute confidence in all countries except Israel.

[NEXUS]

Quote: bouncyhunter

But in general: who gave the USA the right to decide who should have nuclear weapons, and who should not? Again "self-assignment"?

pasha
I think a more hypocritical position on the question of whether there should be nuclear weapons in Iran, among the Jews. Everywhere they remember the Holocaust, the persecution of the Jews, however, when it comes to the Iranians, the Israelis really do not want nuclear weapons to appear in Iran. But for some reason they do not spread their NUCLEAR PROGRAM and even do not allow the opportunity to discuss this issue on the international stage. I mean, not only mattresses sin on the exclusivity policy of some over others.
And what Israel does with regard to Iran is the same as the USA does with respect to the Russian Federation in essence.

[bouncyhunter]

Hi Andrey!

Quote: NEXUS

when it comes to the Iranians, the Israelis really do not want nuclear weapons to appear in Iran.

The old "sworn friendship" does not rust.

Quote: NEXUS

But for some reason, about their nuclear program they are not spreading and do not even allow the opportunity to discuss this issue in the international arena.

There is someone to learn from and with whom to take an example:

Quote: NEXUS

what Israel does with respect to Iran is the same as the USA does with respect to Russia

[Strips]

Quote: NEXUS

Iran. But for some reason, about their nuclear program they are not spreading and do not even allow the opportunity to discuss this issue in the international arena.

They do not allow it, since if they allow it, Muslim countries will begin to develop nuclear weapons, since Israel officially cannot accept the presence of nuclear weapons in Israel.

Moreover, Israel had nuclear weapons before the Dnieper, which means that Israel has every right to enter the nuclear club of countries such as the United States and Russia.

Quote: NEXUS

I mean, not only mattresses sin on the exclusivity policy of some over others.

You can’t mix countries that have signed the Dayau and gained access to technology, etc., and Israel, which the Dayau has never signed.

Quote: NEXUS

And what Israel does with regard to Iran is the same as the USA does with respect to the Russian Federation in essence.

No, not the same.

[abc_alex]

They do not allow, because if they allow, then Muslim countries will start developing nuclear weapons since in Israel the presence of nuclear weapons in Israel officially they will not be able to accept.

Wake up :) The Islamic Nuclear Bomb has been around for a long time. At Pakistan.

[Strips]

Quote: abc_alex

Wake up :) The Islamic Nuclear Bomb has been around for a long time. At Pakistan.

I am aware, and there will be Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, etc.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Tiras

They do not allow, because if they allow, then Muslim countries will begin to develop nuclear weapons

And who lives in these Muslim countries? Animals, subhuman, or just the scum of society without the right to self-defense?

Quote: Tiras

You can’t mix countries that have signed up to the Day and gained access to technology.

That is, the countries of the nuclear club are the highest caste of countries, and all the other nations are a flock of rams without rights?

Quote: Tiras

No, not the same.

Wrong.

[Strips]

Quote: NEXUS

And who lives in these Muslim countries? Animals, subhuman, or just the scum of society without the right to self-defense?

People living there are not able to create stable states without dictatorial regimes and with adequate behavior.

And where does the right to self-defense?

Quote: NEXUS

That is, the countries of the nuclear club are the highest caste of countries, and all the other nations are a flock of rams without rights?

The countries of the nuclear club are stable countries, able to behave appropriately and able to maintain balance.
Moreover, who forced to sign the Day?

Quote: NEXUS

Wrong.

I’m not mistaken.

[ANCIENT]

Shouting to the whole world was not necessary! Could quietly enrich themselves with uranium, and even create nuclear weapons along the way! With him, Iran would have somehow calmer.

[Teberii]

This is the point of warning, in other words, scare and force to speak another language. The DPRK policy is an example of this.

[The black]

Quote: ANCIENT

With him, Iran would have somehow calmer.

But to others - no. Including us ...... Iran now does not need to think about nuclear weapons, but to create modern air defense and air forces ....

[LSA57]

Quote: ANCIENT

Shouting to the whole world was not necessary! Could quietly enrich themselves with uranium, and even create nuclear weapons along the way!

in a quiet well, it won’t work out. there at each facility the IAEA inspection at any time could appear

[Strips]

Quote: LSA57

there at each facility the IAEA inspection at any time could appear

Magate did not have access to some of the facilities. This was also one of the problems of the contract.

And moreover, not at any moment, but in advance by warning.

[LSA57]

Quote: Tiras

Magate did not have access to some of the facilities. This was also one of the problems of the contract.
And moreover, not at any moment, but in advance by warning.

So what? enrich uranium and nuclear weapons do, it’s not oven pies. this is a complicated process and you won’t do it in the basement. and where it can be done, under the control of the IAEA. even if they warn when they arrive, although this is not so, you won’t stop the process and you won’t just start

[alex-cn]

They still cannot deal with Israel ... It seems that everyone knows that it exists, but there is none ...

[Strips]

Quote: LSA57

. and where it can be done, under the control of the IAEA

No, read what I am writing to you - Iran does not allow Magate to suspicious objects.

It is ridiculous to read when Magate says that Iran is complying with the treaty and at the same time, Magate states that Iran does not let them into suspicious objects.

How can we say that a treaty is respected if Magate does not have access to suspicious objects and cannot believe them.

Quote: LSA57

even if they warn when they arrive, although this is not so, you won’t stop the process and you won’t just start

It depends on what is being done and why in a particular place.

[farcop]

Quote: ANCIENT

Shouting to the whole world was not necessary! Could quietly enrich themselves with uranium, and even create nuclear weapons along the way! With him, Iran would have somehow calmer.

And who told you that they will not give it? That's just the county countries from this is not very calm.

[LSA57]

Washington upheld the termination, and therefore Iran, reserve the right to reply, decided to declare that it would resume uranium enrichment on its territory.

Do not give slack. Gaddafi gave a little, the result is known

[Strips]

In Iran, politicians or leaders are incredibly stupid.

Europe can’t force the United States to back down, and that’s understandable. And what is Iran doing?

Says: since the United States came out I will break the contract ...
And what should Europe do, which wants to preserve the treaty? She has no choice but to ultimately support US sanctions and withdraw from the treaty.

Iran is trying to force Europeans to influence the United States, and this is when Europe, to the detriment of its relations with the United States, climbed to defend Iran and at the same time begin to violate the treaty - this is Iran’s shot at its feet.

Iran has too high an opinion about itself and instead of being silent in a rag while Europe is fighting for it, it sets the conditions and intends to violate the treaty.

Iran itself leads to the return of sanctions.

[ANCIENT]

So you yourself and for some reason push on Iran, forgetting that a cornered one can rush and give back! Most true, you and the United States had to leave everything as it is, not provoke Iran, get off with verbal juggling! And you simultaneously began to threaten, and even your hired trump nuclear contract was canceled unilaterally! They lived in Russia, they didn’t hear this “do not wake it famously, while it is quiet” ???

[Strips]

Quote: ANCIENT

So you yourself and for some reason push on Iran, forgetting that a cornered one can rush and give back!

Change? DPRK will be made from Iran.

Quote: ANCIENT

Most true, you and the United States had to leave everything as it is, not provoke Iran, get off with verbal juggling!

That is, let Iran develop nuclear weapons?
No thanks.

Quote: ANCIENT

you simultaneously began to threaten, and even your hired trump nuclear contract was canceled unilaterally

Because Iran lied when it was said everywhere that it does not have a nuclear weapons program and that Islam generally prohibits its creation, while they themselves had a program and worked it out.

Quote: ANCIENT

They lived in Russia, they didn’t hear this “do not wake it famously, while it is quiet” ???

There is such an expression, maybe you also heard it in Russia - to be afraid of wolves, not to go to the forest.

[ANCIENT]

Hello! Have you directly and honestly the whole world admitted that you have nuclear weapons? ??? As they say, there’s nothing to blame for the mirror if the face has natural defects in the form of excessive curvature! !!

[Strips]

Quote: ANCIENT

Hello! Have you directly and honestly the whole world admitted that you have nuclear weapons? ???

What for? To launch a Muslim nuclear arms race?
You already have few problems in the world?

Quote: ANCIENT

As they say, there’s nothing to blame for the mirror if the face has natural defects in the form of excessive curvature! !!

Israel's face is all right. Israel did not sign the day.

[Alex-a832]

Which is to be expected. If Iran violates the terms of the “agreement”, from which the EU and Russia refused to leave, this will be its disastrous step. The United States, with its pack of BV allies, is just waiting for a reason. Iran simply will not have time to repeat the DPRK successes in this direction.

[rocket757]

Hi
All this will not be very funny, if it is, of course.
A boom to see, I hope the Persians understand that it is not just striped stripes that hold the light.

[Alex-a832]

Hi Victor
I hope that the world holds on, incl. through the efforts of Russia. The boom is to see what remains for us.

[rocket757]

There are enough crazy people in BV ... the Persians are certainly not angels, but at least they are stable and controlled by their leadership, ento plus.

[Comrade Ivanov]

It is said that Putin was a good tactician and a bad strategist. Unfortunately, in Russia there has never been a strategy or tactic. There was an agreement, and what a horror, Russia and other girls did not leave, and men from the United States and Iran left. One wants and maybe the others listen and execute!

[Alex-a832]

Quote: comrade Ivanov

It is said that Putin was a good tactician and a bad strategist. Unfortunately, in Russia there has never been a strategy or tactic. There was an agreement, and what a horror, Russia and other girls did not leave, and men from the United States and Iran left. One wants and maybe the others listen and execute!

The fact that Russia “never” had no strategy and tactics, as I understand it, is based on deep ignorance in the history of Russia, as well as in ignoring the fact that the population owns less than one and a half hundred million the largest land area on the planet, despite to multiple creeps of neighbors to nibble a piece from Russia. Maybe these strategies and tactics are not always ideal, as under Catherine, for example, but they also do their work for the good of Russia.

[Alex-a832]

Quote: Comrade Ivanov

For 300 years Russia wants to conquer 100 km2 in the Balkans and cannot!

This is where such a conclusion?
Catherine wanted to be Russian and became Russian, because we are not a nation, but a people. Only here you can hear a driver from some Caucasian man who has not given way: "where are you going to, the chock is not Russian ?!"

Quote: Comrade Ivanov

Russia is a territorial-administrative unit

And in which country is Russia a territorial-administrative unit?
You can underestimate the importance of Russia as much as you like, it will not become less from this.

[Kostadinov]

No, Paul. There are five nuclear powers in the world: the United States, Russia, Great Britain, France and China, which possessed it BEFORE signing the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. The rest - India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, according to this agreement, possess it illegally.

1. Signing of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons voluntary. The withdrawal from this agreement is also the sovereign decision of each state and there is such a clause on exit to the agreement.
2. Israel, India and Pakistan have never signed the NPT. The DPRK signed, but entered the agreement according to all the rules.
3. Nuclear states under the treaty have long been obliged to carry out complete nuclear disarmament, but have not done so far.
4. A nuclear state must have split nuclear technology for peaceful purposes with a non-nuclear state but do not.
So, Israel, DPRK, India and Pakistan did not violate any agreement, and Iran does not. They do not possess any weapons illegally. But the nuclear state violated all their commitments and eating will turn the NPT into an agreement on the eternal monopoly of five states on nuclear weapons.

[Zaurbek]

This is not the answer of the United States ... Europeans were begging Iran to remain in the treaty, Iran said "Ok", then do everything according to the treaty .... Europeans are gone to think and consult with Trump. This, you see, is a reminder of the contract.

[net0103net]

That's right, well done, enrich, work for the good of the homeland of the Iranian Republic. Such work will never be in vain.

[high]

The United States and European countries had a very tenacious and popular belief that by talking, concessions, exhortations, you can make the villain live by our rules. It is enough to agree with him.
They stepped on the same rake as before the Second World Europe, agreed, with Hitler.
Please, Iran, in 10 years we are allowing to obtain nuclear weapons, but not today!
Trump came out of this conspiracy, realizing its futility and depravity. It is impossible to come to terms with ideology, and all the more so with obscurantism. This obscurantist ideology is second only to strength, faith and firmness in upholding one's values ​​and principles.
The Arab countries and Israel have unsuccessfully proved the detriment of conspiracy for peace, the United States took three years, has not yet reached Europe.
There is hope that it will reach Europe after studying the original documents of Iran’s nuclear program exported by Mossad.

[abc_alex]

Please, Iran, in 10 years we are allowing to obtain nuclear weapons, but not today!
Trump came out of this conspiracy, realizing its futility and depravity. It is impossible to come to terms with ideology, and all the more so with obscurantism. This obscurantist ideology is second only to strength, faith and firmness in upholding one's values ​​and principles.

Nonsense do not fool, honestly! What are 10 years old? Sit down and read the IAEA report. In it, people who are knowledgeable in the question clearly said - Iran no in principle opportunities to enrich uranium to weapons level.
In short: only two industrial enrichment methods are known in the world. The method that Iran chose is Soviet, centrifugal. It is divided into 2 conditional cycles. To the "fuel" level and slightly higher and to the "weapons" level. At these levels, different centrifuges. And if Iran can get first-level centrifuges relatively easily, then access to second-level centrifuges is shut off for him. A few countries possess the technologies for their manufacture, and all of them are participants in the Iranian "nuclear deal."
The whole “battle” with Iran was not around weapons-grade uranium, but around enrichment to the fuel level! And Iran has refused this enrichment.

In the field of obscurantism, just Israel in this case shows a visual example. In your wooden desire to lower the opponent's baseboard, your policies led to the collapse of a system that could reliably control the Iranian atom. And do not hope that Europe understands when Israel has real fear, and when political games. It is not necessary to think that there are illiterate fools around Israel who can suck out rotten fish of your "intelligence". Israel has so much discredited itself during the investigation of the "Iranian program" that today only half-fools take your word for it in Europe. Nobody in the world doesn't want a new "nuclear player" to appear. But today nobody will drag coal from the fire for the sake of your political ambitions. And there is no need to pretend to be a naive child, the United States withdrew from Iran programs on its own purely economic and domestic political interests.

[nikoliski]

Iran with nuclear weapons will become a real, powerful power (weaker (mainly due to the lack of such oil reserves) the DPRK with only 10 warheads is safe from external attack)